SitesOffering‘Free’CreditReport s:
WorthConsumerCon sideration?
Reviewof24SitesShowsPotentialforConfusion
andUnnecessaryExpenses
byRobertN.Mayer,Ph.D.
TylerBarrick
UniversityofUtah
July3,2007
ConsumerReportsWebWatch
101TrumanAvenue
Yonkers,NY107031057
Tel.:914.378.2600
www.ConsumerWebWatch.org
Page2
TABLEOFCONTENTS
EXECUTIVESUMMARY ________________________________________________________3
RecommendationstoConsumers_____________________________________________4
Credits __________________________________________________________________5
ABOUTCONSUMERREPORTSWEBWATCH______________________________________6
INTRODUCTION_______________________________________________________________7
KeyDefinitions____________________________________________________________7
ThePotentialProblemsWithAlternativeSites____________________________________7
ArrivingatAlternativeSites __________________________________________________8
METHODOLOGY______________________________________________________________9
Sample __________________________________________________________________9
Questionnaire _____________________________________________________________9
DataCollection ___________________________________________________________10
MAJORFINDINGS ____________________________________________________________10
ThreeBasicChoices ______________________________________________________10
FewActualSellers________________________________________________________11
Figure1:RelationshipsAmongWebSites______________________________________13
FreeUseoftheTerm“Free” ________________________________________________15
Table1:UseoftheTerm“Free”______________________________________________16
PotentiallyImportantOmissions______________________________________________17
FACTActRights__________________________________________________________17
Table2:SiteDisclosureofFACTActRights ____________________________________18
TypeofCreditScore(s) ____________________________________________________19
ChargingandCancellationProcedures________________________________________19
PrivacyandSecurityPractices_______________________________________________20
PurchaseExperiences _____________________________________________________20
CreditScores____________________________________________________________21
CancellationProcedures ___________________________________________________21
CONCLUSIONS______________________________________________________________22
BestPractices____________________________________________________________22
RecommendationstoConsumers____________________________________________23
StudyLimitationsandRemainingQuestions ____________________________________24
REFERENCES_______________________________________________________________25
Appendix1:FinalCreditReportSampleandSearchEngineSou rce __________________27
AppendixII:Questionnaire ____________________________________________________28
AppendixIII: InterraterReliability ______________________________________________35
Page3
EXECUTIVESUMMARY
StudyPurpose
ThisreportexaminesWebsitesthatofferconsumerspaidaccesstotheircreditreportsincombination
withcreditscores,creditmonitoring,and/oridentitytheftinsurance.Thesesitesarealternativesto
annualcreditreport.com,createdasaresultoftheFairandAccurateCreditTransactionActof2003
(FACTA),whichentitlesconsumerstoobtain,onceayear,afreecopyoftheircreditreportsfromeachof
thethreemajorcreditreportingbureaus–Equifax,Experian,andTransunion.
KeyDefinitions:
Acreditreportisadocumentgeneratedbyacreditbureau,suchasEquifax,Experian,
orTransunion.Itshowsaperson’screditorrepaymenthistoryovertime,basedondata
frombanks,merchantsandothercreditors.
•Acreditscoreisoneofseveralnumericalsummarymeasures,oftenrangingfrom300
(negative)to850(positive),oftheinformationcontainedinaconsumer'screditreport.
•Creditmonitoringisapaidservicethatalertsconsumerswheninquiriesaremadeinto
theircreditreports,orthecontentoftheirreportschanges.Sometypesofqueries,such
asthosemadebyabankwhenaconsumerseekstoopenalineofcredit,canactually
affectthecreditscore.Otherinquiries,suchasfrommarketersseekinginformationto
makeoffersofcredit,donotaffectthescore.
The“alternative”sitestoannualcreditreport.commarketthemselvesaggressivelytoconsumers.
Consumerswhoknowinglyusethealternativesitesasanadjuncttoannualcreditreport.commayfind
theirservicesvaluable.However,consumersusingthealternativesitesbecauseofconfusionabout
annualcreditreport.comanditsalternativesmayenduppayingneedlesslyforsomethingtheyareentitled
bylawtoreceiveforfree,orpayingmorethannecessaryforcreditscores.Alternativesites(e.g.,
www.annualcreditreports.com)havebeencriticizedforblurringthedistinctionbetween
annualcreditreport.comandothersites.ThisresearchexaminesawiderarrayofWebsitepracticesthat
mayperpetuateconsumerconfusion,orcauseproblemsevenwhenconsumersunderstandtheyare
payingforservicesbeyondthoseprovidedbyannualcreditreport.com.
MajorFindings
1.Basedonananalysisof58offersmadeon24alternativesites,weconcludethattheenticementof
freecreditreportsandfreecreditscoresisanintegralpartofthemarketingofcreditrelatedservices.
Themostcommonoffer(57%ofthe58offersanalyzed)providesoneormorefreecreditreportsandone
ormorefreecreditscoreswiththepurchaseofacreditmonitoringservice.Thesecondmostcommon
offer(15%oftheremaining)involvesaccesstoafreecreditscoreswiththepurchaseofthreecredit
reports. Someoftheseusesoftheterm“free”maybeinconsistentwiththeregulatoryguidelinesofthe
FederalTradeCommissionandtheselfregulatorystandardsoftheBetterBusinessBureau.
2.WhilethereappeartobeanabundanceofWebsitesofferingcreditreportsforfree,oraspartofa
multiserviceofferthatincludessomethingforfree,theindustryisfarmoreconcentratedthanitfirst
appears.Ofthe24sitesanalyzed,ninewereownedbyorcloselyconnectedtoTransunionandeight
wereownedbyorotherwisecloselyconnectedtoExperian.Thisconcentratedmarketstructurehas
potentiallynegativeconsequencesforcompetitionandaspectsofmarketperformance(e.g.,price,quality,
choice,andinnovation).
3. Many Web site names and URLs contain the word “free” and/or are similar enough to
annualcreditreport.comtopossiblycauseconsumerconfusion.Thoseusingtheword“free”include:
• free3bureaucreditreport.com
• freebiecreditreport.com
• freecreditreports.com
• freecreditreportsinstantly.com
• freecreditreport.com
• thefreecreditreportsource.com.
Page4
Thosesimilartoannualcreditreport.cominclude:
• creditreport.com
• creditreporting.com
• nationalcreditreport.com
4.Inadditiontotheuseoftheword“free”in WebsitenamesandURLs,thewordisusedliberallyon
most Websitesstudied.Includingthenineusesoftheword“free”toindicateaWebsite’sname,there
were312usesoftheword“free”acrossthe24sitehomepages.(SeeTable1.) Thisisanaverageof13
usesperhomepageandamedianof8usesperhomepage.Therewere,ofcourse,manyadditional
usesoftheword“free”onpageslinkedtothehomepage.Whilesomeoftheseusesdonotseem
designedtoattractconsumerpurchases,themajorityclearlyare.
5.Onewayinwhich Websitescanavoidbeingconfusedwithannualcreditreport.comistoprominently
disclosetheexistenceandpurposeofannualcreditreport.comtoconsumers.Fourteenofthe24sites
indicatedtheexistenceofannualcreditreport.com,eightofwhichincludedthisinformationontheirhome
page. (SeeTable2.) Someofthedisclosureswereconspicuousbyanyreasonabledefinition,but
severalsitesusedsmallprintand/orlettercolorsthatdidnotcontrastsharplywiththeirbackground.
Furthermore,somedisclosuressubtlydiminishthevalueofthereportsobtainedfrom
annualcreditreport.comwiththeexpression“allfreecreditreportsarenotthesame”or“allfreecredit
reportsarenotcreatedequal.”
6.Mostofferscontainoneormorefreecreditscoreswhenacreditreportorcreditmonitoringserviceis
purchased. Manyofferswereimpreciseabouttheexactnatureofthecreditscore(s)tobeprovided,that
is,whetherconsumerswouldbereceivingthewellestablishedFICOscoreprovidedbyFairIsaac
Corporationoranyofahalfdozenotherscoresassociatedwithoneofthethreemajorcreditreporting
agencies(e.g.,VantageScore). Thisinformationwasoftennotavailableuntilafteraconsumerhadmade
apurchaseorsignedupforafreetrialofaservice.Eventhen,consumersmightnotfullyunderstandthe
differencesamongthevariouscreditscores.
7.Sitesgenerallydidanexcellentjobofdisclosingprivacyandsecuritypolicies.Thirdpartyicons,such
asVeriSign,TRUSTe,andBBBOnLine,werecommonlyusedtoaddcredibilitytothesepolicies.
8. Some Websitesdidagoodjobofdisclosingtheirchargingandcancellationpolicies,butothersdidnot.
SeveralWebsitesstatedexplicitlynochargeswouldbemadeagainstaperson’screditcarduntilafter
theexpirationofanytrialperiod,whileothersiteswereambiguousorunclear. Similarly,somesites
providedconspicuousandclearinformationabouthowtocanceltrialperiodsandservices.Others
providedonlyageneralcustomerservicephonenumber. Asmallscalepurchasingtestdemonstrated
thatcompaniesdidanexcellentjobofhonoringconsumercancellationrequests.However,some
cancellationprocedureswerecumbersome,orlikelytoleaveconsumerswonderingwhethera
cancellationprocesshadbeensuccessful.
RecommendationstoConsumers
Forconsumersrelativelyunfamiliarwithcreditreports,scores,andmonitoring,werecommend
unbundlingtheseservicesandproceedingincrementally. Mostconsumersshouldbeginbyexercising
theirrightundertheFACTActtoobtainfreecopiesoftheirthreecreditreports.Thethreereportscanbe
obtainedsimultaneously,butmanyexpertsadvisethataccessbestaggeredoverseveralmonths.For
consumerscuriousabouttheircreditscores,oneormorecanbepurchasedatlowcostwhenaccessing
reportsatannualcreditreport.com.Consumersshouldconsiderpurchasingcreditmonitoringservices
onlyafterreviewingthecontentsoftheirfreecreditreports,andperhapsoneormorecreditscores.
Securityfreezesoncreditreports,providedbylawinamajorityofstates,maybealessexpensiveand
moreeffectivealternativetocreditmonitoringservicesforconsumerswhoareparticularlyconcerned
aboutpreventingidentitytheft.
Page5
Methodology
Thesampleof24 Websitesexaminedinthisstudywasobtainedbyenteringthephrase“freecredit
report”inthesearchenginesofGoogleandYahoo! Foreachsearchengine,thefirstteneligibleorganic
(i.e.,nonsponsored)andfirstteneligiblesponsoredsitesweretaken,yieldingfourlistsofteneach.After
eliminatingsitesthatappearedonmorethanoneofthefourlists,24uniquesitesremained.
Aquestionnairewasdevelopedforthesiteanalysis,usingthefiveConsumerReports WebWatch
Guidelines forWebsitecredibilityasastaringpoint.DatawerecollectedduringmidDecember,2006.
Dataforeachsitewascodedindependentlybytworesearchers,afterwhichanydiscrepancieswere
reconciled. ServicesfromsixWebsiteswerepurchasedbyaConsumersUnion(CU)employeeinlate
December,2006.
CREDITS
ThisprojectwaswrittenanddirectedbyRobertN.Mayer,Ph.D.,aconsultantandadvisertoConsumer
ReportsWebWatch.MayerisaprofessorintheDepartmentofFamilyandConsumerStudiesatthe
UniversityofUtah.TylerBarrick,agraduatestudentattheUniversityofUtah,assistedMayerwith
researchandtesting. TheprojectwasfundedbyConsumerReportsWebWatch.Thereportwasedited
byJørgenWouters,WebWatch’sseniorproducer,andBeauBrendler, WebWatch’sdirector.Some
testingwasperformedbyaConsumerReportsWebWatchstaffemployee. WebWatch,ConsumersUnion
andtheUniversityofUtaharenotaffiliatedwithanyonlinecreditservicereviewedinthisstudy.
Page6
ABOUTCONSUMERREPORTSWEBWATCH
ConsumerReportsWebWatchservesasadailyresourceofunbiasedandtrustworthyinformation,using
theprovenmethodsofConsumerReportsandotherindependentlyderivedresearchmethods. The
WebWatchresearchagendaincludeshealth,financialservices,newsandinformationsites,children’s
sitesandgeneralissuesofconcerntoconsumersontheWeb,suchasprivacy,spywareandinformation
security.
ConsumerReportsWebWatchatConsumersUnion,thenonprofitpublisherofConsumerReports
magazineandConsumerReports.org,acknowledgessupportofThePewCharitableTrusts,theJohnS.
andJamesL.KnightFoundation,andtheOpenSocietyInstituteasinstrumentaltoitsfoundingandfirst
fiveyearsofsuccess.WebWatch'sinvestigativereports,articlesandnewsareavailabletothegeneral
publicat
WebWatchacceptsnoadvertisingorcorporatesupportwhatsoever. WebWatchservesasaspecial
unpaidadvisertotheStopBadware.orgprojectofTheBerkmanCenterforInternet&SocietyatHarvard
LawSchoolandtheOxfordInternetInstitute.WebWatchdirectorBeauBrendlerisamemberoftheAt
LargeAdvisoryCommitteetotheInternetCorporationforAssigningNamesandNumbers(ICANN).
Page7
INTRODUCTION
StudyPurpose
ThepurposeofthisreportistoexaminetheoperationofWebsites–otherthanthegovernment
sanctionedannualcreditreport.com–thatofferconsumers“free”accesstotheircreditreports.Asa
resultoftheFairandAccurateCreditTransactionActof2003(FACTA),allconsumersnowhavetheright
torequestandobtain,onceayear,acopyoftheircreditreportsfromeachofthethreemajorcredit
reportingbureaus–Equifax,Experian,andTransunion.PriortoFACTA,consumershadtherightto
obtainafreecopyoftheircreditreportonlyunderalimitedsetofconditions:(1)theyweredeniedcredit,
atleastinpart,basedontheinformationcontainedinacreditreport;(2)theywereunemployedand
wouldapplyforunemploymentwithin60days;(3)theyreceivedpublicassistance;(4)theyhadbeena
victimofidentitytheftandplacedafraudalertontheirfile;or(5)believedtheirfilecontainedinaccurate
informationduetofraudulentactivity(ConsumersUnion,undated).
KeyDefinitions:
Acreditreportisadocumentgeneratedbyacreditbureau,suchasEquifax,Experian,
orTransunion.Itshowsaperson’screditorrepaymenthistoryovertime,basedondata
frombanks,merchantsandothercreditors.
•Acreditscoreisoneofseveralnumericalsummarymeasures,oftenrangingfrom300
(negative)to850(positive),oftheinformationcontainedinaconsumer'screditreport.
•Creditmonitoringisapaidservicethatalertsconsumerswheninquiriesaremadeinto
theircreditreports,orthecontentoftheirreportschanges.Sometypesofqueries,such
asthosemadebyabankwhenaconsumerseekstoopenalineofcredit,canactually
affectthecreditscore.Otherinquiries,suchasfrommarketersseekinginformationto
makeoffersofcredit,donotaffectthescore.
TherightunderFACTAtofreecreditreportswasimplementedaccordingtoaphasedtimetablebetween
December2004andSeptember2005.BetweenDecember1,2004andDecember1,2006,
approximately52millioncreditfileswereprovidedtoconsumersforfreebythethreemajorcredit
reportingagenciesviatheannualcreditreport.comWebsite(FederalRegister,2006).Simultaneously,an
unknownnumberofconsumershavevisitedalternative Websitesandobtainedcreditreports in
conjunctionwiththepurchaseofothercreditrelatedservices,typically,creditscoresand/orcredit
monitoringservices.Thisreportfocusesonthesealternativesitesandexaminestheiroffersto
consumers. ThereportfindssubstantialvariationinthetransparencyoftheseWebsitesandinthevalue
theypotentiallyoffertoconsumers.
ThePotentialProb lemswithAlternativeSites
Isthereanythingwrongwithsitesthatprovideanalternativetoannualcreditreport.comasawayof
obtainingfreecreditreports?Notnecessarily.Mostofthesealternativesitesofferconsumersafree
creditreportinconjunctionwithservicesthatcannotbeobtainedfromannualcreditreport.com.Thevalue
ofthesealternativesiteswillvaryfromconsumertoconsumerdependingonhowmuchothercredit
relatedservicessuchascreditscores,creditmonitoring,andidentitytheftinsuranceareworthto
them.Yet,theexistenceofthesealternativesitesmaycauseproblemsforconsumersandcostthem
money:
1.Consumersunawareoftheirrighttoobtainfreecreditreportsfromannualcreditreport.commaybuy
expensiveservices fromothersites,believingtheyaregettingacreditreportforfree.
2.Consumersunawarethattheycanpurchasecreditscoresatannualcreditreport.commayspendmore
thannecessarywhenofferedafreecreditscorebundledwiththepurchaseofcreditreports.
3.Consumerswhopatronizealternativesiteswiththeintentionofcancelingservicesbeforeafreetrial
expiresmayincurunwantedchargesiftheyforgettocancelwithintheallottedtimeorencounter
unexpectedbarrierstocanceling.
Page8
Thenumberofconsumerswhohaveencounteredtheseandotherproblemsisunknown,butapparently
millionsofconsumershavetransactedwithsitesotherthanannualcreditreport.com.
FreeCreditReport.com,ownedbyExperian,invitesconsumersto“joinover20millionconsumerswho
havealreadycheckedtheirFREEExperianCreditReport”andtorememberthat"allfreecreditreports
arenotcreatedequal.”Similarly,CreditReport.comurgesconsumersto“trustthenamethathasprovided
millionsofconsumersjustlikeyouwiththeirfreecreditreports."Thepotentialexistsforatleastsomeof
thesetransactionstohavebeenbasedonconsumerignoranceandconfusion.
Intworeportspublishedin2005(Dixon,2005a,2005b),theWorldPrivacyForumbroughttolightthe
existenceofovertwohundredWebdomainsthatresembledtheofficialannualcreditreport.comsiteor
closelymisspelledvariations.Theauthorofthereportsreferredtositessuchasannualceditreport.com
andannualcreditcheck.comas“imposterdomains”and“impostersites,”tohighlightthepossibilityof
consumersendingupatunwantedWebsites.
TheU.S.FederalTradeCommission,theagencyinchargeofimplementingandenforcingFACTA,has
alsorecognizedthepossibilityofconsumerconfusion.TheCommission’sconsumereducationeffortsare
designedtopreventdeception.Forinstance,oneoftheFTC’sWebpages( />urgesconsumerstobewaryofsearchengineresultsusingphrasessuchas“freecreditreport”or“free
creditscore.”TheCommission’s Websitealsotellsconsumersitwantstohearfromthemiftheypaidfor
whattheythoughtwasafreeannualcreditreport.
TheCommission’sstrongestmethodofdeterringandpunishingconsumerdeceptionisthrough
prosecutionofindividualcompanies.In2005,theCommissionsettledchargesthatConsumerinfo.com,a
companyownedbyExperian,haddeceptivelymarketed(priortothepassageofFACTA)“freecredit
reports”bynotadequatelydisclosingthatconsumersautomaticallywouldbesignedupforacreditreport
monitoringserviceandcharged$79.95iftheydidn’tcancelwithin30days.Insettlingthecharges,the
defendantagreedtopayalmostamilliondollarsinrestitution(U.S.FederalTradeCommission,2005).In
2007,Consumerinfo.compaidanadditional$300,000tosettlechargesthatithadviolatedthetermsofits
2005agreementbyfailing“todiscloseadequatelythatconsumerswhosignedupwouldbeautomatically
enrolledinacreditmonitoringprogramandcharged$79.95"(U.S.FederalTradeCommission,2007).
Despitetheseprecedentsofenforcement,thisreportshowssomequestionablepracticespersist.
ArrivingatAlternativeSites
Giventheexistenceoffreecreditreportsatthegovernmentsanctionedsite,howmightconsumersend
upatasiteotherthanannualcreditreport.com?Thejourneycanbeeitherbusinessinitiatedor
consumerinitiated.Televisioncommercials,popupadvertisementsandlinksonWebsites,and
unsolicitedemailarethreeways Websitesofferingfreecreditreportsandscorestrytoattractcustomers.
Forexample,the Websitefreecreditreport.comwasthefifteenthlargestspenderononlineadvertisingin
November2005($4.4million).Thisoccurredapproximatelythesametimeconsumerswerefirstbeing
offeredatrulyfreecreditreportundertheFACTAct(ITFactsAdvertising,2006).AsrecentlyasMarch
2007,ExperianwasthetopInternetadvertiser,spending$90millioninamonth(ITFactsAdvertising,
2007). Unfortunately,itisnotpossibletospecifyhowmuchofthisamountwasspentadvertising
Experiancompaniesthatoffercreditreports,suchasfreecreditreport.comandconsumerinfo.com,as
opposedtocompanieslikelowermybills.comandpricegrabber.com,alsoownedbyExperian.
Consumers,canalsoinitiatetheprocess. Evenwhenaconsumerknowsasiteexistsatwhichfree
copiesofcreditreportscanbeobtained,heorshemaynotknowtheexactURL.Today,ifaperson
entersaphraselike“freecreditreport”inamajorsearchenginelikeYahoo!orGoogle,
annualcreditreport.comwillbethefirstitemintheorganic(i.e.,nonsponsored)listofresults,buta
consumermightbedistractedbythemanysurroundingsitesinboththesponsoredandorganicresults.
Anotherwayinwhichaconsumermighttraveltoasiteotherthanannualcreditreport.comisbytypinga
URLlikecreditreport.com,creditreports.comorfreecreditreport.com. Allthreeofferconsumersavariety
ofwaystoobtaina“free”creditreport. Freecreditreport.commentionstheexistenceof
annualcreditreport.com,butitimmediatelydiscouragesconsumersfromvisitingthegovernment
sanctionedsitebystatingthat“allfreecreditreportsarenotcreatedequal.”
Page9
Inshort,thereareseveralpathwaysbywhichconsumerslookingforafreecreditreportcanarriveata
siteotherthanannualcreditreport.com.Thegoaloftheresearchdescribedbelowistoanalyzethe
contentofthealternative Websitesconsumersmightreachintentionally,orunintentionallywhen
searchingforfreecreditreportsonline.
METHODOLOGY
Theresearchmethodologyusedinthisstudyisavariantoftheapproachusedinseveralother
investigationsofWebsites,includingstudiessponsoredbyConsumerReports WebWatch(Buckleitner,
2006;McGee,2005;Scribbins,2002).Thebasicapproachistovisitandtestasamplingofthemost
widelyusedWebsitesinagivenareaofconsumerinterest–inthiscase,sitesthatsellcreditreports,
creditscores,creditmonitoring,andrelatedservices.Theapproachistomatchascloselyaspossible
thebehavioroftheaverageconsumerwhoisconsideringatransactionwithagiven Website.
Sample
Thesearchterm“freecreditreport”wasenteredonNovember17,2006inthetwomostwidelyused
Internetsearchengines,GoogleandYahoo!Then,foreachsearchengine,thefirstteneligiblesites
weretakenfromtheorganicsearchresultsplusthefirstteneligiblesponsoredsites.Aneligiblesitewas
definedasonethatofferedafreecreditreportorscoreaspartofacommercialservice,excluding
annualcreditreport.com.Thismeanteliminatingthreesites(FTC.gov,PrivacyRights.org,vcr.org)that
pointedconsumerstoannualcreditreport.comanddidnotmentionanyofthealternativesites.Italso
meantdeletingsixsitesthatwere“pureportals”or“linkfarms,”thatis,siteswhosesolefunctionwasto
providenumerousandunrankedlinkstosites(notnecessarilyincludingannualcreditreport.com)where
purportedlyfreecreditreportscouldbeobtainedfromcommercialsites.Thesesiteswere:2muslims.com,
annualcreditreport1.com,consumerfinanceportal.com,cardratings.com,finance.yahoo.com,and
hotboards.com.
Aswouldbeexpected,therewereseveralduplicationsamongthefortyeligiblesites.Therewasoverlap
notonlybetweenthetwosearchenginesbutalsobetweensponsoredandorganicresults.Forexample,
thesitefreecreditreport.comappearedonallfourlists.Afterretainingonlyonesiteamongduplicates,the
finalsampleconsistedoftwentyfour Websites(seeAppendix1).
Questionnaire
Aquestionnaire(seeAppendix2)wasdevelopedtomeasurethegeneralfeaturesofeachoftheselected
sitesaswellasthespecificcharacteristicsofitsofferstoconsumers.Theselectionofthegeneralsite
featureswasdriven,inpart,bythefiveConsumerReports WebWatchGuidelines forWebsitecredibility.
Amongtheseguidelines,themostrelevanttositesofferingcreditserviceswereasite’sidentity(e.g.,
disclosureofownershiporparentcompany),customerservice(e.g.,clearandconspicuousdisclosureof
costsandproceduresforcancelingmemberships),andprivacy(e.g.,providingconsumerswithcontrol
regardingfuturecontactsinitiatedbythesite,itsaffiliates,orthirdparties).
Beyondthesegeneralfeatures,thecharacteristicsofasite’screditrelatedofferswereanalyzed:what
specificservicesweremadeavailabletoconsumers,atwhatprice,underwhatconditions,inassociation
withwhichclaimsorendorsements?Wepaidspecialattentiontotheuseoftheterm“free.”
Thequestionnairewasbasedonamodelofaconsumerwhowas“windowshopping,”thatis,tryingto
gatherasmuchinformationaspossiblewithoutactuallysigningupforaservicethatprovidescredit
reportsandotherrelatedservices.Ourfictionalconsumerwaswillingtoprovideeach Websitewitha
name,geographicaddress,telephonenumber,and/oremail,butdatacollectiontypicallyhaltedwhenthe
shopperwasaskedtoprovideacreditcardnumberorsocialsecuritynumber. Insomeinstances,the
windowshopperwasabletoaccessasite’sfullsetoftermsandconditions.Inothercases,this
informationwasnotavailablewithoutmakingapurchase.
Page10
Thequestionnairewaspretestedandrefinedbyapplyingittosix WebsitesthatappearedontheGoogle
orYahoo!searchresultsbutbelowtheofficialsampleof24sites.Thefirstthreesiteswereusedtorefine
thequestionnaireperse,thatis,makingsurethatthequestionsmadesenseandtheanswercategories
werecomprehensive.Twoadditionalsitesnotincludedintheofficialsamplewereusedtogaugeand
improveconsistencybetweenthejudgmentsofthetwodatecoders. Finally,asixthpretestsitewasused
toformallymeasureintercoderagreement.(SeeAppendix3oncodingforadiscussionofintercoder
reliability.)
DataCollection
InitialdatacollectiontookplacebetweenDecember5and18,2006. Twouniversitybasedresearchers
beganbycodingelevenuniquesites,thatis,twentytwoofthetwentyfoursites. Next,eachresearcher
codedthetworemaininguncodedsitesandinterjudgeconsistencywasmoreformallymeasured.(See
Appendix3foradiscussionofintercoderreliability.)Afteradiscussionofthefewdiscrepancies,each
researchercodedtheelevensitesnotyetexamined.Throughthisprocedure,eachofthe24siteswas
codedtwice.
ActualpurchasesfromsixWebsitesofcreditrelatedservicesweremadeandrecordedbyathird
researcheraConsumersUnionemployeebetweenDecember21,2006andJanuary2,2007.
Researchersintendedtopurchasefromalargernumberofsites,butbecauseoftheextensive
interconnectionsamongthesubjects,itwasnotpossibletobuyfromsomesitesafterpurchasingfrom
another.Thirtydaysaftertheinitialpurchase,eachservicewascancelled.Thesixpurchasesiteswere:
credit.com,creditreporting.com,identityguard.com,myfico.com,nationalcreditreport.com,and
thefreecreditreportsource.com.
MAJORFINDINGS
1.ThreeBasicChoices
Across24sitesstudied,therewasatotalof58offers.Themajorityofsites(16outof24)containedthree
offers,atleastoneofwhichinvolvedafreecreditreport. Twositesboretwooffers;sixsitesonlyone.
(Threesitescontainedmorethanthreecreditrelatedoffers,butwecodedonlythefirstthreeoffersona
given Website.)
Theoffersonthetwentyfoursitesvaryindetail,butthemajority(51)fellintooneofthreebroad
categories:
A.Buythreecreditreportsandgetonecreditscoreforfree,sometimeswiththeoptionofbuying
additionalcreditscores(8offers)
B.Buycreditreportsandscores,withnothingofferedforfree(10offers)
C.Receiveoneormorefreecreditreportsand/oroneormorefreecreditscoreswhenenrollingina
creditmonitoringservice,oftenwithafreetrialperiod(33offers)
Theadvantageofthefirsttypeofoffer(OfferA)istheconvenienceofhavingallthreecreditreports
generatedatthesametimeand,accordingtosomeoftheWebsites,inan“easytoread”format.The
approximatecostofthisconvenienceisthepriceoftheservice(typically$30$40)minusthecostof
obtainingacreditscoreseparately.Thesescoresareavailablewhenaconsumerobtainsacreditreport
viatheannualcreditreport.comsitefor$5.95(fromExperianforaVantageScore),$7.95(fromTransunion
foraVantageScore),and$7.95(fromEquifaxforaFICOScore).Sothecostoftheconvenienceisabout
$25sinceonecanobtainallthreereportsforfreeandbuyascoreforlessthan$10.Someoffersinclude
theoptionofpaying$5of$10moreforallthreecreditscores,butthecostoftheconvenienceisstill
about$20.
Page11
Thesecondtypeofoffer(OfferB)doesn’tincludeanythingforfree,butitcomesintwovariations.Oneis
buyingasinglecreditscoreandcreditreportfromthesamecompany.Theothervariationisbuyingall
threescoresandallthreereports.Thefirstvariationtypicallyispricedat$14.95butdoesn’tofferanyreal
conveniencewhencomparedtogoingtoannualcreditreport.comandthenobtainingafreecreditreport
andbuyingacreditscorefor$5.95$7.95.Essentially,theconsumerispaying$7fornotusing
annualcreditreport.com.(Thiswouldnotbethecasewhenaconsumerhasalreadyexercisedhisorher
annualrightsundertheFACTActwithinthelastyear,inwhichcaseafreeversionofthecreditreport
wouldnotbeavailableforseveralmoremonths.)ThevariationofoffertypeBthatinvolvesmultiple
reportsandscoresistypicallypricedat$39.95,althoughwedidfindoneofferfor$29.95. Aconsumer
canbuythesameinformationforhalfthepricebygoingtoannualcreditreport.comandbuyingthecredit
scoresofferedbyeachofthethreemajorcreditbureaus.
OfferCisbyfarthemostcommonoffer.Itentailssigningup,usuallywithafreeonemonthtrialperiod,
foracreditmonitoringservice.Thesecreditmonitoringofferstypicallyincludeatleastonefreecredit
scoreandatleastonefreecreditreport.Afterthetrialperiodexpiresandtheservicebeginsonapaid
basis,acustomercanaccesstheirscoresandreportswithoutrestriction.Sixofthe33offerprovidefree
creditreportsbutnoscores,whiletheremainingofferprovidesacreditscorebutnoreports.Credit
monitoringservicesaretypicallypricedonamonthlybasis,withchargesrangingfrom$9.95to$12.95for
onereportandcorrespondingscore.Consumerspayatypicalfeeof$19.95permonthforcredit
monitoringinconjunctionwithallthreereportsandscores.
Avigilantconsumerwhowantstominimizehisorherfinancialoutlaycanenrollin,butthencancelwithin
thedesignatedperiod,oneofthecreditmonitoringservicesthatprovidesallthreecreditreportsand
correspondingscores.Anothersavvystrategyistosignupforatrialperiodfrommorethanonesitebut
staggeredacrossseveralmonths.Onepaysnothingunderthesescenariosaslongaseachserviceis
cancelledwithintheallottedperiodoftime.(Thereisalimittothesestrategies,however,asrevealedby
thepurchasingexercisedescribedbelow.)
Iftheconsumerforgetstocancelbeforetheendofafreetrialperiodordeliberatelychoosesnottocancel,
thevalueofthecreditmonitoringserviceisdifficulttoestimateandwouldvarysubstantiallyamong
individualconsumers.Forapersonwhowantstoviewhisorhercreditreportsandscoresonamonthly
basis,$19.95iscertainlylessexpensivethanbuyingtheseservicesseparately.Forapersonwhoneeds
tocheckhisorhercreditscoresandreportsinfrequently,itmaybelessexpensivetostartwith
annualcreditreport.comand,whenneeded,buyonetimeaccesstoreportsandscoresfor$3040.
2.FewActualSellers
Atfirstglance,thereappeartobedozens,ifnothundreds,ofWebsitesotherthan
annualcreditreport.comthatofferconsumersvariouswaystoobtainfreecopiesoftheircreditreports.On
closerinspection,however,thereisfarlessvariety.DespitedifferingURLsandWebsitenames,many
sitesaremembersofoneoftwo“families”headedbyeitherTransunionorExperian.
Ofthe24sitesexaminedinthisstudy,nineweremembersoftheTransunionfamily.Eightwerepartof
theExperianfamily.Insomecases,TransunionorExperianownedaparticularsite,andthisownership
relationshipwasclearlydescribedonthe Website. Forexample,the Websiteofconsumerinfo.com
prominentlydisplaysthephrase“AnExperian.”Otherdisclosuresstronglyimplyownershipwithoutstating
itexplicitly.Truecredit.comconspicuouslyprints“ByTransUnion”atthetopofitshomepage.
Creditreport.comdisplaysinfaintletteringatthebottomofitshomepage:“CreditReport.comisa
servicemarkofMightyNet,Inc.”
Inmanyinstances,therelationshipbetweenWebsitesappearedtobeoneofserviceproviderandclient.
Asanexample,speedycreditreports.comdisclosesthatits“ServicesareprovidedbyTrueCredit.” As
anotherexample,identityguard.comstatesthatits“identitytheftandcustomerservices[are]providedby
Intersections,Inc.,America’sforemostfraudprotectionandsecurityorganization.” Inmostcases,the
exactnatureoftherelationshipbetweenWebsitesissomewhatambiguousduetotheabsenceofexplicit
ownershipstatements.However,thereareseveralstrongindicatorsofinterconnectionsbetweenand
Page12
among Websites,including: identicalsignuppagesforservices,informationenteredatonesitecoming
upautomaticallyonanothersite,andtheinabilitytopurchaseoneserviceafterhavingpurchasedanother
fromthesamefamily.
Figure1showsanestimateoftherelationshipsamongthe24sitesinthisstudy. Afewofthe
relationshipsare“strong,”inthesensethatanownershiprelationshipiseitherstatedorstronglyimplied.
Themajorityofrelationshipsare“weak,”notwellexplainedontheWebsitesandprobablybasedona
servicerelationshipratherthanownershipofonesitebyanother. Mostimportantisunderstandingthe
relationshipsamongtheTransunionandExperian“families.”
Page13
Experian.com
Consumer
Info.com
FreeCredit
Report.com
Credit
Reporting
.com
eloan.com
Freebie
CreditReport
.com
lending
tree.com
moving
links.com
FIGURE1:RelationshipsAmongWebSites
Note:TheabovemapshowsWebsitesthatareownedbyotherWebsitesorareotherwise
affiliatedwith otherentities.GraycellsarecompaniesbutnotWebsites.
Transunion.com
TrueCredit.com
PrivacyMatters
.com
Free3Bureau
Credit
Report.com
FreeCredit
ReportsInstantly.com
speedycredit
reports.com
spendonlife
.com
freecredit
reports.com
Credit.com
MightyNet
CreditReport.com
TheFreeCreditReport
Source.com
Intersections
Id entityGuard.com
NationalCreditReport
.com
LexingtonLaw
.com
Equifax
.com
MyFico
.com
Page14
Shouldconsumersbeconcernedthatmorethantwothirdsofthe Websitesinoursampleareownedby,
orcloselyaffiliatedwith,twoofthreemajorcreditreportingagencies?Severalobjectionsarepossible.
First,muchofthemarketingofservicesfromWebsitesthatserveasalternativesto
annualcreditreport.comoriginatefromthecompaniesthatare,bylaw,supposedtobemakingiteasyfor
consumerstoexercisetheirrighttoobtainfreecreditreports.Certainly,themajorityoftheoffersmadeto
consumersonalternativesitesgobeyondwhatconsumerscanobtainfromannualcreditreport.com(i.e.,
freecreditreportsonceperyearandinexpensivecreditscores). Shouldthemajorcreditreporting
agencies,alreadyrequiredbyFACTAtodispensefreecreditreports,usethelureoffreecreditreportsto
sellserviceslikecreditmonitoring?Shouldtheybesellingcreditreportswiththeincentiveoffreecredit
scores?
Further:AlargenumberofseeminglyindependentWebsitesarecloselyconnectedtothesamecredit
reportingagency.Aswithanyindustry,concentratedownershiporcontrolreducescompetitionand
therebycanundercutincentivesforpriceandqualitycompetition.Also,consumerswholiketo
comparisonshopamongWebsitesmaywastetimeandeffortcomparingsitesthatappeartobe
competitors,butinrealityofferidenticalornearlyidenticalservices.
AfinalobjectionfollowsfromtheappearancethatawiderangeofWebsitesexistthatoffercreditreport
relatedservices.Theappearanceofvarietymayencourageconsumerstobelievethereareimportant
differencesamongthecreditreportsandcreditscoresavailablefromthesesitesandleadthemto
purchaseredundantinformationfrommultiplesites.Consumersmightbeforgivenforthinkingthatby
patronizingmorethanoneofthesesitesthattheywillbeobtaininguniqueinformationfromeachone.
Moreover,theymaythinkthecreditreportsandscorestheypurchasearedifferentfrom,andsuperiorto,
thosethatcanbeobtainedviaannualcreditreport.com.
Somealternativesitestakereasonablestepstopreventconsumersfrombeingconfusedabouttheir
identity.Truecredit.com,forexample,disclosesinaconspicuousfashionitsrelationshiptoitsparent,
Transunion.DirectlybelowtheWebsitebannerofTruecreditonefindsthewords:“Broughttoyouby
Transunion.”Atthebottomofthesite’shomepage,onealsofinds(inveryfaintprint)thestatement:
“TrueCredit.comispoweredbyTransUnionInteractive,awhollyownedsubsidiaryofTransUnion.”Also,
ifoneexploresthe“AboutTrueCredit”portionoftheWebsite,onefindsthestatement:“Majorityowned
byTransunion.”
Privacymatters.comissomewhatlessclearaboutitsownership.Thesiteneverreferstoownership
explicitly,butitshomepagestates:“ServicesprovidedbyTrueCredit,Inc.”Thisphraseleavesunresolved
thenatureoftherelationshipbetweenprivacymatters.comandtruecredit.comand,inturn,Transunion.
Justastruecredit.comprovidesservicesforprivacymatters.com,privacymatters.comappearstoreceive
customers fromanumberofothersites,includingfree3bureaucreditreport.com,
freecreditreportsinstantly.com,speedycreditreports.com,andspendonlife.com.These“fourthtier”sites
offernoexplicitinformationabouttheirownership,buttheyselltheservicesofPrivacyMatters123and
eachsitestatesinconspicuously,ifatall,thatitsservicesare“providedbyTrueCredit.”Noneofthese
sitesmakesreferencetoTransunion,theownerofTruecredit.Thesepracticesdonotappeartobe
consistentwithConsumerReports WebWatchGuidelines,whichstate:
• “Sitesshouldclearlydisclosetheirownership,privateorpublic,namingtheirparentcompany”
• “Sitesshouldclearlydiscloserelevantbusinessrelationships,includingsponsoredlinkstoother
sites.”
Disclosurepersemaynotsufficetoexplainasite’sownershipandfinancialrelationships.Considerthe
caseofcreditreporting.com.Under“AboutUs,”onefinds:
Creditreporting.comisa WebsiteforEvergreenCreditReporting,Inc.,whoisaproviderofcredit
reportsandrelatedservicestousersnationwide.EvergreenisamemberoftheConsumerData
IndustryAssociation,Inc.whichistheindustryassociationinthiscountryforcreditreporting
companiesandcreditbureaus EvergreenisalsoknownasTrucreditorTrucredit.com.
Page15
EvergreenmarketsitscreditreportsasaTrucreditCreditReport.Thisisnottobeconfusedwith
Truecredit.com,thecompanyownedbyTransUnion.
Printedatthebottomofthefirstpageofcreditreporting.com’ssignupprocedureisthefollowing
statement:
ConsumerInfo.com,Inc.islicensedtousetheExperiantrademark,othertrademarksandservice
marks Theproductsonthis WebsiteareofferedbyConsumerInfo.com,Inc.
Butconsumerinfo.comisownedbyExperian.Sowhatisthenatureoftherelationshipbetween
creditreporting.comandExperian?
Whilewedidnotascertaintheprecisenatureofalloftherelationshipsamongthesistersitesinthe
TransunionandExperianfamilies,wewereabletodeterminethattheyarestrong.Oneindicationwas
thatinformationenteredintoaformatoneofthesiteswithinafamilytypicallywasdisplayed
automaticallywhenfillingoutasimilarformatasistersite.Anothersignofthestrengthofthese
interrelationsemergedduringtheexploratorypurchasingphaseofthisresearchproject(seebelowfor
moredetails).Whenwetriedtobuysimilarservicesfromtwomembersofthesamefamily,wefounditto
beimpossible.Forexample,theConsumersUnionemployeewasdeniedtheabilitytopurchasecredit
monitoringfromfreebiecreditreport.com,presumablybecauseshehadalreadypurchasedthisservice
fromitssistersite,creditreporting.com.Similarly,theCUemployeecouldnotbuyacreditmonitoring
servicefromfree3bureaucreditreport.comorspeedycreditreports.comortruecredit.com,presumably
becauseshehadalreadytransactedwiththeirsistersite,credit.com.Insomecases,theserejections
weremetwithnoexplanationatall;inothers,theCUemployeewastoldbythesitethatitssystem
indicatedthatshehadmadeapreviouspurchasefromthesiteoranotherrelatedsite.
3.FreeUseoftheTerm“Free”
Theterm“free”whenusedasamarketingtoolcanbeproblematic. Accordingly,theU.S.FederalTrade
Commission(1971)andtheBetterBusinessBureau(1994)haveissuedguidelinesontheterm’sproper
use.Whiledifferingslightlyfromoneanother,bothsetsofguidelinesemphasizethreebasicprinciples.
First,thetermsofanyfreeoffershouldbeclearlyandconspicuouslystated.Second,theprice(or
quantity)ofanyitemthatmustbepurchasedtoobtainthefreegoodshouldnotbeincreasedtocover,in
wholeorinpart,thecostofthefreeitem.Third,thefreeoffershouldbetemporary.Ifitisacontinuous
combinationoffer,thennopartofitcanreallybeconsideredfree.Whenusedproperly,theofferoffree
goodsorservicescanbe,accordingtotheFTC,“ausefulandvaluablemarketingtool.”But,theFTC
continues,“suchoffersmustbemadewithextremecaresoastoavoidanypossibilitythatconsumerswill
bemisledordeceived.”
Atthealternative Websitesstudiedhere,theterm“free”wasusedgenerously.Ontheonehand,thisis
notsurprisinggiventhatthesitesweregeneratedwiththesearchterm“freecreditreport.”Ontheother
hand,itmightnothavebeeneasytopredictthatthetermfreewouldappear312timesonthehome
pagesofthetwentyfoursites.Thevaluesamongthesitesrangedfromalowofzerousestoahighof81
usesoftheword“free.”Themediannumberofusesonthesehomepageswas8,asummarystatistic
thatdiscountstheoneortwoextremelyhighvaluescomparedtothesimpleaverageof13.
Ofthe312referencesto“free,”about40couldnotbetiedtoaspecificoffer.Thesereferenceseither
pertainedtomorethanoneofasite’soffers(e.g.,“freecreditreportoffers”or100%FreeCreditReport–
Online”),toasite’soverallfeatures(e.g.,“tollfreecustomerservice”),ortothegeneralsubjectofcredit
reportsandscores(e.g.,“HowcanIgetaFreeCreditReport?”).Theterm“free”wasalsousednine
timesaspartofthenamesofsixWebsites.Thesitesare:
• free3bureaucreditreport.com(twice)
• freebiecreditreport.com(twice)
• freecreditreports.com(twice)
• freecreditreportsinstantly.com
Page16
• freecreditreport.com
• thefreecreditreportsource.com.
Otherreferences(16)totheterm“free”involvedservicesthatwereonlytangentiallyrelatedtocredit
reportsandcreditscores(e.g.,freefinancialcalculator;tollfreeassistance;freequotesforhealth,dental,
orcarinsurance). Twentyreferencespertainedtoaconsumer’srightsundertheFreeCreditReporting
ActortheFACTAct(seebelowformoredetailsonthedisclosureofFACTArights).
Anadditionaltenreferencestotheword“free”werecontainedinawarningtoconsumersonthe
freebiecreditreport.comWebsite.Thesitecautionsconsumersagainsttypographicalerrors(e.g.,
reecreditreport.com)thatmightleadthemtoimpostersitesthatsoundlikelegitimatesites:
SomecommonmisspellingsofFreeCreditReportandScoreinclude:reecreditreport,
wwfreecreditreport,freecreditreport,feecredetrepot,totalyfrecreditreport,absolutly
frecreditreport,freecreditreport,freecreditreportcom,myfreecreditreportcom,freecretitreport,
freecredatreportcom,freecreditreporting,feecreditreportcom,freecerditreport,frrecreditreport,
absolutleyandtotalleyfrrecredtreport,credtieport,creduthistory,freeecerditreportes,
getcreditreport,freecreditreportsfreecreditreport.
Warningconsumersaboutthedangersofinadvertentmisspellingsiscertainlyuseful,butitisalsoironic,
sincefreebiecreditreport.comcouldbemistakenbyconsumersforannualcreditreport.com.
Butthemajorityofthereferences,181,werepartofaspecificofferinvolvingcreditreports,creditscores,
and/orcreditmonitoring. Ofthese181,overeightypercent(150)oftheusesoftheterm“free”werein
referencetoacreditmonitoringprogramofferedonatrialperiodof7or30daysandincludingatleast
onefreecreditreportandatleastonefreecreditscore. Anadditional20useswereinconjunctionwitha
freecreditreport(butnotafreecreditscore)aspartofacreditmonitoringtrialperiod.Theseoffers
typicallyapplythewordfreetocreditreports,creditscores,creditmonitoring,orallthree,buttheseoffers
canalsoapplytheword“free”toidentitytheftinsurance,telephonecontactnumbers,andshipping,even
todescribesomethingdeliveredviatheInternet,andthereforevirtuallycostfreetothesupplier. Eleven
additionalsitesofferedfreereportsand/orscoresinconjunctionwithcreditmonitoring,butwithoutthe
freetrialperiod. Table1showsabreakdownofthemajorwaysinwhichtheterm“free”wasusedonthe
homepagesofthe24sites.
Table1:UseoftheTerm“Free”
TYPESOFUSESOFTHETERM“FREE” NUMBEROFUSES
Aspartofacreditmonitoringservicewithtrialperiod 170
Aspartofacreditmonitoringservicewithoutatrialperiod 11
InreferencetoconsumerrightsunderFACTActofFCRA 20
Inreferencetorecommendedsitesorpartnercompanies 20
Inreferencetofreecreditscore(s)whenreport(s)arepurchased 14
Inreferencetocreditcalculatorsorpricequotes 16
Inthe Website’sname 9
Inreferencetoclosemisspellingsofannualcreditreport.com 10
Allotheruses 42
TOTAL 312
Page17
Someofthe312usesoftheword“free”acrossthe24Websites,especiallythosereferringtocredit
reportsandscores,mightbeviewedasbeinginconsistentwiththeguidelinessetbytheFederalTrade
CommissionandtheBetterBusinessBureau. Takeasanillustrationanofferontheexperian.comsiteto
obtain“aFREEPLUSScore”withthepurchaseofExperian’s“3BureauCreditReport”for$34.95.
(Similarofferscanbefoundonother Websites.)Itisdifficulttoseehowbuyersofthisofferaregetting
anythingforfree. Theycangetthesamethingbygoingthroughannualcreditreport.comandpayingjust
$5.95foracreditscorefromExperian.Butthat’snottheonlyreasonuseoftheterm“free”maybe
inappropriate. BeforetheadventofFACTA,Experianandtheothermajorcreditreportingcompanies
typicallysoldcreditreportsaloneforabout$8each(oftenless,dependingonstatelegislation).Thus,the
marketvalueofthethreereportonescoredeal(usingpastandcurrentprices)islessthan$35.Under
theseconditions,itisdifficulttoconcludethatthefollowingconditionsetbytheFTChasbeenmet:
“Whenthepurchaseristoldthatanarticleis“Free”'tohimifanotherarticleispurchased,the
word“Free”indicatesthatheispayingnothingforthatarticleandnomorethantheregularprice
fortheother.”
BythesametokenFTC(andBBB)guidelinessuggestthatforafreeofferofsomethingtobe“specialand
meaningful,”theoffershouldbeshortterm.Otherwise,theofferbecomestheregularsellingprice,in
whichcase,nothingisbeingobtainedforfree.Whilethecurrentstudywasnotlongitudinalinnature,it
appearsthatidenticaloffersoffreecreditreportsandfreecreditscoreshavebeeninplaceforseveral
years,farbeyondthemaximumofsixmonthsrecommendedbytheFTC.Atalesslegalisticlevel,itis
worthaskingwhetheruseoftheword“free”isappropriateona Websitesuchasfreecreditreport.comor
thefreecreditreportsource.com,whenthesite’sprimaryofferingtoconsumersisacreditmonitoring
servicethatcosts$120150onanannualbasis.
4.Potentiall yImportantOmissio ns
TheConsumerReports WebWatchGuidelinesrecommendthat Websitesofferconsumersclearand
easytolocateinformationabouttheir(1)identity,(2)sponsorsandrelevantbusinessrelationships,(3)
financialchargesandmethodsofcancelingservices,(4)methodsofcorrectingincorrectinformation,and
(5)privacypractices.Wehavealreadyexaminedthedisclosureofownershipandbusinessrelationships,
andwefoundthatwithinthetwofamiliesofWebsitesownedorcloselyconnectedtoExperianor
Transunion,informationaboutasite’slineageissometimesclearandconspicuous,butoftenitisnot.
FACTActRights
Perhapsthemostusefulinformationthatanalternative Websitecanprovideconsumersisnotificationof
theirrightsundertheFACTActandtheexistenceoftheannualcreditreport.comWebsite.Thereisa
potentialconflictofinterestforalternative Websiteswhenitcomestodisclosingthisinformation:The
moreconsumersknowabouttheirannualrighttoafreecreditreport,thelesslikelytheyaretopurchase
servicesthatincludeafreereport.Amajority(14)oftheWebsitesmanagetoovercomethisconflictof
interest,althoughtheirdisclosureofFACTAinformation variesacrosssitesintermsofitslocation,
conspicuousness,andwording.
Fivesitesspecializingincreditreports,scores,andmonitoring(consumerinfo.com,creditreporting.com,
experian.com,freecreditreport.com,spendonlife.com)providedinformationaboutaconsumer’srightto
freecreditreports ontheirhomepage,andanadditionalthreesitesofferingabroaderrangeoffinancial
services(eloan.com,lendingtree.com,andmovinglinks.com)disclosedthisinformationonwhat
amountedtothehomepageforcreditrelatedservices. Whiletheseprominentdisclosuresare
commendable,thosemadebyExperianownedorExperianaffiliatedsitesarelikelyduetoarequirement
inthe2005settlementbetweentheFederalTradeCommissionandconsumerinfo.comthatthis
disclosurebemadeclearlyandconspicuously“onthelandingpageofthe Websiteorthefirstpointof
communication”(FederalTradeCommissionvs.Consumerinfo.com,Inc.,2005)
Theremainingsix of14sitesdidnotdescribeaconsumer’srighttoafreecreditreportontheirhome
pagebutdidsoelsewhereonthesite,forexample,withintheorderingprocess(i.e.,afteraconsumerhas
providedpersonalinformation),orwithinasectionoftheWebsitedevotedtoconsumereducation. Four
Page18
ofthe14sitesofferedconsumersmultiplepathstoinformationabouttheirrightsundertheFACTAct.For
example,credit.comalertedconsumerstotheirrighttoafreecreditreportbothaspartoftheordering
processandwithinitsconsumereducationmaterials.Afulllistofthe Websitesthatprovidefullorpartial
informationaboutaconsumer’srightsundertheFACTActisshowninTable2.
Table2:SiteDisclosureofFACTActRights Home/First
Page
Order
Process
Education Other
Consumerinfo.com √ √
Credit.com √ √
Creditreporting.com √
Eloan.com √ √
Equifax.com √
Experian.com √ √
Freebiecreditreport.com √
Freecreditreport.com √
Lendingtree.com √
Movinglinks.com √
Nationalcreditreport.com √
Spendonlife.com √
Transunion.com √
Truecredit.com √
Itisonethingtotellconsumerstheyhavealegislativelycreatedrighttoafreecreditreportonceayear;it
isanothertoinformconsumersonhowtoexercisethatright.Ofthefourteensitesthatmentionedthe
righttofreecreditreportsanywhereontheir Website,tenmadespecificreferenceto
annualcreditreport.com.Fourofthefourteenleftoutthisimportantpieceofinformation.
SomeoftheFACTAdisclosures,regardlessoftheirlocationonthehomepageorelsewhere,weremore
conspicuousthanothers.Acrossthenineteeninstancesofdisclosureacrossthefourteen Websites,
twelvewerejudgedtobeconspicuousbyourtwocoders.Themostcommonmethodofmakingsucha
disclosurenoticeablewasbyprecedingitwiththewords,usuallyinboldletters:IMPORTANT
INFORMATION.IncaseofWebsitessuchasconsumerinfo.com,thisattentiongrabbingphrasewas
followedwithacleardescriptionoftheFACTActandtheprerogativesitgrantstoconsumers:
“Underanewfederallaw,youhavetherighttoreceiveafreecopyofyourcreditreportonce
every12monthsfromeachofthethreenationwideconsumerreportingcompanies.Torequest
yourfreeannualreportunderthatlaw,youmustgotoannualcreditreport.com.
Consumerinfo.comisnotaffiliatedwiththeannualfreecreditreportprogram.”
Attheotherendofthespectrum,nationalcreditreport.com’sonlyreferencetoFACTActrightswasinthe
fifthsectionofalengthysetofarcanedisclaimers,terms,andconditions.Gettingtothesedisclosures
requiresfirstenteringarangeofpersonalinformation.Eveniftheconsumerscrollsdownfarenoughto
findthedisclosure,itmakesnomentionofthe Websiteannualcreditreport.com.
Page19
Thereisnodirectlegalobligationforalternative Websitestoeducateconsumersabouttheircreditrights,
butitcouldbeconsidereddisingenuousforsitesthatsellcreditrelatedservices–especiallythethree
majorcreditreportingbureaus–toleaveoutthisimportantinformation.Itcouldalsobeviewedas
insincereforthesesitesto,first,tellconsumersabouttheirrightsunderFACTAbutthenundercutthis
disclosurewithstatementssuchas:
• “Remember,allfreecreditreportsarenotcreatedequal.GetyourFreeCreditReportandCredit
Scorefromtheleadingproviderofconsumercreditmonitoringproducts(freecreditreport.com)
• “Pleasenotethatnotallfreecreditreportsarethesame.”(consumerinfo.com)
Itiscertainlyappropriatefor WebsitestostressthattheFACTActdoesnotprovideconsumerswith
accesstotheircreditscores,creditmonitoring,oridentitytheftinsurance,butitmightbehardtojustify
anysuperiorityclaimsaboutthecreditreportsreceivedfromannualcreditreport.comversusthose
obtainedfromalternativesites.Whilecreditreportspurchasedfromalternativesitesmayvaryslightlyin
formatfromthoseobtainedforfreefromannualcreditreport.com(e.g.,sidebysidepresentationof
informationfromthethreecreditbureausversusthreeseparatedocuments),virtuallyalloftheinformation
containedinanycreditreportisdrawnfromtheexactsamesource:thethreemajorcreditreporting
bureaus,Experian,TransunionandEquifax.
TypeofCreditScore(s)
Inadditiontothefailureofsomealternativesitestotellconsumersabouttheirrighttoreceivefreereports
annuallyfromthethreemajorcreditreportingcompanies,therearetwoadditionalareaswheredisclosure
onalternativesitesmightbedescribedasspotty:(1)theprecisenatureofthecreditscoresprovidedand
(2)trialperiodchargingandcancellationprocedures.
Thereisalreadysomeconsumerconfusionabouttheexactnatureofcreditscoresandthecompanies
thatprovidethem(ConsumerFederationofAmerica,2004;U.S.GovernmentAccountabilityOffice,2005).
TheoriginalcreditscorewasdevelopedbyFairIsaacCorporationsanditsscore,generallyknownasa
FICOScore,wasuntilrecentlyalmostsynonymouswiththeterm“creditscore.”Currently,FairIsaac
licensesitscreditscoringmethodologytoseveralentities,includingthethreemajorcreditreporting
agencies.Eachoftheseagencies,inturn,modifiesthemethodologyandcreatesscoresbasedonthe
datatheycollect.Forexample,ExperiancallsitsversionoftheFICOScoreitsPLUSScore.Moreover,in
2006,thethreeagenciescollaborativelycreatedanentirelydifferentscore,theVantageScore,witha
maximumvalueof990.(ThemaximumFICOScoreis850.)Withallthisvariation(andthereismore
withintheworldofcreditscoring),itisimportantthat Websitesprovidingcreditscoresbeclearaboutthe
typeofscoreaconsumerwillreceiveand/orpurchase.
Outofthe58offersanalyzedacrossthe24Websites,53includedatleastonecreditscore.Ofthese53
offers,39specifiedtheorganization(i.e.,Equifax,Experian,Transunion,orFairIsaac)associatedwith
thecreditscorethatwouldbeprovided,leaving14thatfailedtodisclosetheprecisenatureorsourceof
thescore.Evenwhenascorewasidentifiedwithaparticularreportingorganization(e.g.,Experian’s
PLUSScore),itwasnotnecessarilyclearwhetherthisscorewasbasedontheFICOorVantageScore
methodology.Thisdifferencecouldbeveryimportanttoaconsumer.Ascoreof800isextremelyhigh
ontheFICOscaleof850butnotasenviablecomparedtotheVantageScore’smaximumvalueof990.
Overall,sitescouldhavebeenfarmorepreciseindescribing,asaformofprepurchaseinformation,the
creditscorestheyprovided. Incontrast,sitesfromwhichcreditscoreswereobtainedinasmallscale
purchasingexercise(seebelow)didagoodjobofcomplyingwiththecreditscoredisclosure
requirementslaidoutinSection609(f)(1)oftheFairCreditReportingAct.
ChargingandCancellationProcedures
Atrialperiodissupposedtoallowconsumerstheopportunitytotryaproductorservicewithoutmaking
anylongtermcommitmenttoit.Inthecaseofoffersinvolvingcreditmonitoring,24outof33provided
consumerswithafreetrialperiodusually30daysinlengthbutsometimesonlyaweek.Inall24of
thesecases,consumerswereaskedtoprovideacreditcardnumber,butitwasnotalwaysclearwhat
wouldhappenwiththiscreditcardinformation:wouldtherebeachargethatwouldlaterbecreditedback
orwouldtherebenochargeuntiltheendofthetrialperiod?
Page20
Intenofthe24cases,thesiteexplicitlystatedthattherewouldbenochargeonaperson’screditcardbill
untilaftertheendofthetrialperiod.Insixadditionalinstances,theofferincludedastatementthatthere
wouldbeachargeduringthetrialperiod,typicallytocovera$1refundableprocessingfee.Inthe
remainingeightcases,however,theofferwassilentonwhetheracharge,evenoneassmallas$1,
wouldbeleviedduringthetrialperiod.
Asindicatedabove,evenconsumerswhoareawareoftheirrighttofreecreditreportsundertheFACT
Actcanfinditattractivetoenrollinafreetrialofacreditmonitoringservice.Iftheycanceltheservice
beforetheexpirationofafreetrialperiod,theseconsumersendupwithoneormorecreditscoresanda
betterideaofwhatcreditmonitoringservicesentail,bothatnocharge.Tocancelaservicebeforetheend
ofthetrialperiod(orlateron),aconsumerneedstobeabletofindandthenfollowthecancellation
procedureswithoutanyunduebarriers.Howdidthesitesperformonthismeasure?
In18ofthe24trialperiodoffers,cancellationspecificinformationwasprovidedsomewhereontheWeb
site.In16ofthese18cases,telephoningthecompanywastheonlymethodofcanceling.Intwo
additionalcases,consumerscouldchoosebetweenusingthetelephoneorsendinganemail.An
exceptiontothisruleofeasycancellationprocedureswasequifax.com.Tofindouthowtocancelits
creditmonitoringtrialperiod,aconsumermustenterhisorhername,address,emailaddress,andother
personalinformation.Then,thecancellationproceduresareprovideddeepinalengthysectiontitled
“TermsofUse.”Ifaconsumermanagestoreachthispoint,heorshewillfindthefollowinginstructions:
YoumaycanceltheProductbynotifyingUs.YoumaynotifyUsbyfirstloggingintothe
MyEquifaxMemberCenter.Onceloggedin,clickonthe"ContactUs"buttonandyoucancontact
theEquifaxCustomerCareteamatthetelephonenumberoremailaddresslistedonthatpage.
Whilenotformidable,thisprocedureismorecumbersomethanjustprovidingaphonenumberfor
cancellationcalls.Insixofthe24offersinvolvingafreetrialperiod,nocancellationspecificinformation
wasfoundonthe Website.
PrivacyandSecurityPractices
Incontrasttoincompleteorabsentdisclosuresofownership,businessrelations,creditscoretype,and
cancellationprocedures,therewereseveralareasinwhichdisclosurewasparticularlystrongand
accordedwellwiththeConsumerReports WebWatchGuidelines:contactinformation,privacypolicies,
andsecuritypractices.Twentythreeofthe24sitesprovidedinformationabouthowtocontactthesitevia
telephone,email,and/orregularmail.Twentyofthe23providedthiscontactinformationonthehome
pageordirectlyfroma“ContactUs”linkonthehomepage.Oftheremainingthreesites,oneprovide
contactinformationunder“AboutUs,”anotherprovideditunder“FAQ’s,”andthethirdprovideditonly
aftertheorderingprocesscommenced.Theremainingsitehada“ContactUs”linkatthebottomofthe
homepage,butitonlyprovidedtheconsumerwithaformthatcouldbeusedtosendanemailmessage.
Therewasnoemailaddressperse,noranyothertypeofcontactinformation.
Withrespecttoprivacypolicies,22ofthe24siteshadpoliciesthatwerereadilyaccessible,usuallyfrom
thehomepage.One Websitehadnopolicy (freebiecreditreport.com),andanothersite’spolicywas
burieddeepinthebuyingprocess(thefreecreditreportsource.com).Similarly,allbutoneofthesites
(freebiecreditreport.com)addressedthesecurityoftransmitteddatawithsecuritystatements,httpsURLs,
padlockicons,and/orsecuritysealsofapprovalfromprogramslikeVerisignandScanAlert’sHackerSafe.
5.PurchaseExperiences
Togainadditionalinsights,aConsumersUnionemployeepurchasedcreditreportingservicesfromsixof
the24sites.(Wehadintendedtomakepurchasesfrommoreofthesites,butwefoundthatthesame
personcannotbuyfromasiteifheorshehasalreadypurchasedaservicefromanothersitewithina
larger“family.”)Theprimarypurposesofthispurchasephaseofthestudywereto:(1)testthe
cancellationproceduresoftheWebsites,includingthecreditingofanychargesmadetocreditcards;and
(2)comparethequalityofthecreditreportsprovidedbythesitestothoseobtainedfrom
annualcreditreport.com.
Page21
CreditreportserviceswerepurchasedfromthefollowingWebsitesduringthelasttendaysof2006:
• credit.com
• creditreporting.com
• identityguard.com
• myfico.com
• nationalcreditreport.com
• thefreecreditreportsource.com
CreditScores
Allsixofthesesitesprovidedacreditreportandatleastonecreditscore.Fiveofthesix(allexcept
myfico.com)providedcreditmonitoringaswell.Fourofthesix(allexceptidentityguard.comand
nationalcreditreport.com)startedwitha30dayfreetrialoftheirservices.
Uponexamination,thecreditreportsdeliveredbythesesixWebsitesdonotdiffersubstantiallyincontent
orformatfromthoseavailableatannualcreditreport.com.Thisisnotsurprisinggiventhatallthecredit
reportdataprovidedbythesealternativesitescomesfromthesamethreemajorcreditreporting
companiesthatparticipateinannualcreditreport.com.Identityguard.comandnationalcreditreport.com
providethethreecreditreportsinasidebysideformat,astyleofpresentationthatmaybeusefulto
consumers.
Theresultswithrespecttocreditscoresweresomewhatmoresurprising.Somesites(credit.com,
creditreporting.com,myfico.com,thefreescreditreportsource.com)gaveasinglecreditscore.Others
(identityguard.com,nationalcreditreport.com)providedallthreescores.Thetotalof10scoresobtained
fromthesixsiteshadamaximumvalueof850,buttherewereslightvariationsamongthescores,even
forthoseassociatedwiththesamecreditreportingagency.Identityguard.comshowedanExperianscore
of782,andcreditreport.comprovidedanExperianPLUSscoreof773.Nationalcreditreport.comand
thefreecreditreportsource.comalsoprovidedExperianbasedscoresdescribedasCreditXpertscores.
(Bothofthelatterscorewere791.)WhilethedifferencesamongthesefourExperianbasedscoresare
notgreat,thetypicalconsumermightbeconfusedaboutwhetherthereisanimportantdifferenceand
whichshouldbesoughtinthefuture.
Theslightvariationinscoresbasedondatafromthesamecreditreportingbureauwasnotconfinedto
Experian.InthecaseofscoresbasedonTransuniondata,nationalcreditreport.comofferedaCreditXpert
scoreof805,whilecredit.comandidentityguard.comyieldedscoresof792and791,respectively.The
twoEquifaxbasedscoresalsodifferedslightlyfromoneanother(787vs.791).ThesingleFICOscore
was806.Alltold,thetenscoresrangedfrom773to806.Whileallofthesescoresaregenerally
consideredexcellent,consumerswouldbejustifiedinexpressingbewildermentaboutthedifferencesand
wonderingwhichismostworthpurchasing.
CancellationProcedures
Thesmallscalepurchasingexperimentalsoyieldedinformationregardingcancellationprocedures.
Theseprocedurescansometimesinvolvesurprises.ConductingasimilartestforthemagazinePC
Worldbutforabroaderrangeofservices,reporterTomSpring(2006)wrotethathewasshockedtolearn
Equifax'screditmonitoringservice(“CreditWatchGold”)requiredathreemonthminimumcommitment.
Inotherwords,aconsumercouldnotcancelafteronemonthandwalkawayfromtheservice.Wedidnot
comeacrossthispolicyinthefive Websitesfromwhichwepurchasedcreditmonitoringservices,andour
cancellationexperiencesweregenerallypositive.Inthefourcasesoffree30daytrialperiods,no
chargeswereincurred.Theothertwoservicesdidnotofferfreetrials;thesesiteschargedtheproper
initialamountsandleviednofurtherchargesaftercancellation.
Whileresultsofourcancellationeffortswerepositive,theprocesswasnotalwayseasy.Therearethree
partstothisprocess:findingthecancellationprocedures,executingthem,thenconfirmingand
documentingthecancellationisdone.Thesamepersonwhofirstorderedtheservicesreturnedtothesix
Websitestotesttheprocess.Herexperiencesvariedwidely.
Page22
Regardingdiscoveryofcancellationprocedures,nationalcreditreport.comwastheonlysitetodisplayan
explicitreferencetocancellationproceduresonitshomepage,viaatablabeled“cancellationpolicy”at
thebottomofthehomepage.Intheotherfivecases,ourbuyerwenttothe“contactus”portionofthe
site.Inthreecases(creditreporting.com,identityguard.com,myfico.com,and
thefreecreditreportsource.com),therewasanexplicitreferencetoaphonenumber,andsometimesan
emailaddressaswell,throughwhichcancellationswereprocessed.Intheremainingcase,therewasno
referencetocancelling,buttherewasatollfreetelephonenumberforcontactingthecompany.
Myfico.com’scancellationpolicyisunique,combiningaconsumerfriendlypracticewithoneactuallyless
friendly.TheWebsiterequiresconsumerstowaituntilatleastthe23rddayofthe30dayfreetrialperiod
beforecancelling.Thisnarrowsthewindowduringwhichconsumersmayexercisetheirrighttocancel.
Ontheotherhand,myfico.comsendsareminderonthe23rdday.Noothersitessentareminder.
TheCUbuyerattemptedtocancelallsixservicesviatelephone,andherexperiencesvaried.The
cancellationproceduresforthefreecreditreportsource.comwerequick,easy,andfriendly.TheCUcaller’s
experiencewithmyfico.comrepresentedtheotherendofthecancellationspectrum.Herfirstphonecall
wasdisconnectedbeforereachinganoperator.Hersecondcallrequiredwaitingtwelveminutesonhold
beforebeingansweredbyanoperator.Then,ourbuyerwasaskedanumberofquestionsthatwere
perceivedasanaggressiveefforttodissuadeherfromcancellingtheservice.Anotherdisquieting
cancellationexperienceoccurredwithnationalcreditreport.com.Thebasicprocedureistoaskthe
consumertoleaveavoicemailmessage,includinghisorhernameandsocialsecuritynumber.Many
consumersmayrightlyfeeluncomfortableleavingsuchinformationonanansweringmachine.
Fourofthecompanies(credit.com,creditreporting.comidentityguard.com,,thefreecreditreportsource.com)
providedourbuyerwithareferencenumberatthetimeofthecall.Creditreporting.comalsosentan
emailmessageconfirmingthecancellation.Myfico.comandnationalcreditreport.comprovidednorecord
ofcancellation.
Insum,theresultsofthepurchaseexperienceundertakenaspartofthisstudyarebasedononlysix
Websitesandtherefore,notdefinitive. Itisimportanttonotethatallsixcompanieschargedtheproper
amountfortheirserviceandpromptlyhonoredcancellationrequests.Sitesvariedwidelywithrespectto
easeofcancellationproceduresandhowtofindthem.Sitesalsodifferedinthenumberoftypesofcredit
scoresprovided,andtherewasadditional,thoughsmall, variationintheexactnumericalscoreyieldedby
scoringregimesbasedonthesamedata.
CONCLUSIONS
BestPractices
Onemightquestionthepracticeofoffering“free”creditreportsasaninducementtosignupforacredit
monitoringserviceoroffering“free”creditscoresasanincentivetopurchasecreditreports–especially
whentheoffersaremadebythesameentitiesrequiredbylawtoprovideconsumerswithgenuinelyfree
creditreports.Itistheconsumerwhodecideswhethertheseoffersareworthaccepting,but Web
publishershavearesponsibility,atminimum,toclearlyandconspicuouslydescribethevariousfeatures
oftheiroffers,includingtheexactnatureofthecreditscoresandreportstobeprovided.
Theyshouldalsorefrainfromdisparagingcreditreportsavailablefromannualcreditreport.com.Itmight
alsobearguedthatWebpublishers –atleastthoseownedbyorcloselyconnectedtoEquifax,Experian,
andTransunion–havearesponsibilitytodiscloseaconsumer’srighttoobtainfreecreditreportsat
annualcreditreports.com.
Basedonthe24Websitesanalyzedinthisstudy,weidentifiedavarietyofgoodpracticesthat,taken
together,shouldconstituteastandardthatallsitesinthiscategoryshouldstrivetomaintain. These
practicesinclude(butarenotrestrictedto):
1.Alertingconsumersonthehomepagetotheexistenceandservicesofannualcreditreport.com(see
Table2).
Page23
2.Avoidingstatementssuchas“notallfreecreditreportsarethesame”thatsuggestcreditreports
providedbyannualcreditreport.comareinferiortothoseprovidedbyanalternativesite.
3.Avoidingnaming Websitesthatmightbeconfusedwithannualcreditreport.com,especiallyregarding
useoftheword“free.”
4.Specifyingclearlyandconspicuouslythenatureofeachserviceoffered,especiallytheexacttypeof
creditscore(s)thatwillbeprovided,aswellastheservice’sprice.
5.Statingclearlyandconspicuouslythetermsofanyfreetrialperiod,whichshouldbenolessthan30
days(somesitesofferatrialperiodof7days).
6.Refrainingfromcharginganything,evena$1processingfee,duringanyfreetrialperiod.
7.Providingclearandconspicuousinformationaboutcancellationproceduresforanyfreetrialperiods
andminimizinghasslesifaconsumerchoosestocancel.
8.Refrainingfromusingmediacoverageofa Websiteoradvertisementspaidforbythesesitesas
mediaendorsementsofthe Website(contrastLendingTree’scarefulpracticeswiththevague“asseen
onTV”statementsoffreecreditreport.comandprivacymatters.com)
9.Usingwellknown,thirdpartysealsofapprovaltoinstillconsumerconfidenceinasite’sprivacyand
securitypractices,especiallyinlightofthesensitivepersonalinformationrequestedbyWebsitesaspart
oftheenrollmentprocess.
10.Refrainingfromaskingirrelevantquestionssuchaswhetherapersonintendstobuyahouseorcar
inthenextsixmonths,whichlikelywillbeusedtocollectmarketingdataforotherproductsandservices.
Althoughnoneofthe24sitesmetalltencriteria,somearelivinguptothemajority.Threeofthebetter
siteswerecreditreporting.com,eloan.com,andexperian.com.Interestingly,thefirsttwoaremembersof
theExperian“family,”buttheothersixmembersoftheExperianfamilydonotfareaswell.Forexample,
freebiecreditreport.comcontainstheword“free”initsname,usestheword“free”fortyeighttimesonits
homepage,discouragesconsumersfromusingannualcreditreport.com,isnotclearonthetypeofcredit
scoreaconsumerwillreceive,usesthevagueendorsementof“asseenin”Newsweek,USAToday,and
TheWallStreetJournal,andprovidesneitheranemailaddressnorageographicaddress. Similarly,
Transunion.comfaredwellonthesecriteria,butseveralmembersofitsfamilydidnotscoreaswell,
includingfree3bureaucreditreport.com,freecreditreports.com,freecreditreportsinstantly.com,and
privacymatters.com.
RecommendationstoConsumers
Somesitesofferconsumersabetterfinancialdealthanothersdo. Thereareavarietyof“bestbuys,”or
combinationofbuys:
1.Fortheconsumerwhowantstoobtainthemostforfreeandisabletocancelbeforetheendofa
sevendaytrialperiodbeforechargesareincurred,thebestdealwasfoundatspendonlife.com(a
memberoftheprivacymatters.combranchoftheTransunionfamily).ThiswastheonlyWebsitethat
claimedtogivetheconsumerallthreecreditreportsandallthreecreditscoresduringafreetrialperiod.
However,thereweresomepossibledrawbacks.Inadditiontotheshorttrialperiod,consumerswere
assessedanimmediatebutrefundable$1processingfee.Forthedurationofthecreditmonitoring
service,theconsumeralsohadnochoiceaboutbeingchargedanadditional$1permonthfor
membershipinSavingSmart,aprogramofshoppingdiscounts.
2.Anotherstrategyistosignupforathirtydayfreetrialofbothexperian.comandtransunion.comcredit
monitoringservices,thencancelbeforetheendofthirtydays.Thiswillyieldonefreereportandscore
fromeachofthesetwocreditreportingcompanies.Equifaxdoesnotofferasimilarfreetrialperiodforits
Page24
creditmonitoringservice,butaconsumercanobtainafreecopyofhisorherEquifaxcreditreportvia
annualcreditreport.comandpurchaseanEquifaxscorefor$7.95.Bycombiningthesethreeactions,a
consumercanobtainallthreecreditscoresandallthreecreditreportsfor$7.95,withtheadditional
advantageofbeingabletostaggeraccesstotheservicesoverseveralmonths.Butconsumersmust
remembertocancelservicesbeforetheendoffreetrialperiods.
3.Consumerswillingtopayfortheconvenienceofgettingthreecreditreportsinconjunctionwiththree
creditscoresfromasinglesiteatasingletimecouldshopnationalcreditreport.com.For$23.95,thesite
providedthreereports,threescores,andafirstmonthofcreditmonitoring.Theservicecanbecancelled
afteronemonth.Thereisnofreetrialandthe$23.95monthlychargeisrecurringuntilcancellation.
4.Ifcreditmonitoringbeyondonemonthisimportanttoaconsumer,severalsitesofferafreetrial
followedbya$9.95monthlychargeforonecreditreport,onecreditscore,andmonitoring viaoneofthe
threecreditbureaus.Similarservicescoveringallthreebureauscanbepurchasedforaslittleas$19.95
(andasmuchas$39.95)permonth.
5. ConsumersUnionrecommendsthatconsumersunbundlethepurchaseofscores,reports,andcredit
monitoring,atleastinitially. StartexercisingyourrightundertheFACTActtoobtainfreecopiesofcredit
reportsfromeachofthethreecreditagenciesusingannualcreditreport.com.Forconsumersalsocurious
abouttheircreditscores,oneormorecanbepurchasedatlowcostwhenconsumersaccess
annualcreditreport.com. Atthetimeofthisstudy,pricesforthesescoreswere:$5.95forExperian,and
$7.95forEquifaxandTransunion.Thetotalforallthreeis$21.85.Contrastthisamountwiththe$47.85
onewouldpayforthreescoresandthreereportsfrommyfico.comorthe$39.95chargedbyseveralother
sites.Plus,usingthestrategyofoptimizingthevalueofusingannualcreditreport.com,theconsumercan
staggeraccesstoreportsacrossseveralmonths.Afteraconsumerhasreviewedthecontentsofall
threecreditreportsandperhapsexaminedallthreecreditscores,heorsheshouldthendecidewhether
creditmonitoringislikelytobeofvalue(forexample,asameansofdetectingidentitytheft)andwhetherit
isimportanttohaveunlimitedaccesstooneorallthreecreditreportsandscores. Securityfreezeson
creditreports,providedbylawinamajorityofstates,maybealessexpensiveandmoreeffective
alternativetocreditmonitoringservicesasameansofpreventingidentitytheft.Toseewhichstateshave
thesecurityfreeze,see:http:/ /www.consumersunion.org/SecurityFreeze.htm
StudyLimitationsandRemainingQuestion s
Acommoncriticismofsurveys–whetherofindividualsororganizations–isthatasampleisnot
representativeofthelargerpopulation.Thiscriticismisnotapplicabletothecurrentstudy.The24 Web
sitesstudiedweredrawnfromboththesponsoredandnonsponsoredsearchresultsofthetwolargest
searchenginesintheUnitedStates(GoogleandYahoo!).Theresultinglistnearlyexhauststhenumber
ofsitesfromwhichconsumersmightpurchasecreditreports,scores,andmonitoringservices.Itincludes
themajorcreditreportingagencies(Equifax,Experian,andTransunion),Websitesownedbyorclosely
affiliatedwiththesethreeagencies,andtheoriginalcreatorofcreditscores(FICO).
Onepotentiallimitationofthisstudyisthattheworldofcreditrelated Websitesisrapidlychanging.
Threemonthsafterdatawerecollected,all24sitesstudiedremaininbusinessandcontinuetooffera
varietyofcreditrelatedservices.Whereasmostsitesremainunchanged,somehadalreadymade
modificationstotheirservices,prices,ordisclosures.Itisthereforeimportantforthereadertoconsider
thesepossiblechanges.
Thereareadditionalquestionsthisstudywasnotdesignedtoanswer.First,andmostbasic:Howmany
consumers,andwhichtypes,arepatronizingthevariouskindsofalternativecreditreportingsites?How
satisfiedaretheywiththeirpurchases?Someofthesitesthemselvessuggestthatbusinessisgood.For
example,freecreditreport.comencouragesconsumersto“joinover20millionconsumerswhohave
alreadycheckedtheirfreeExperiancreditreport.”(Thisvagueclaimhasseveralpossiblemeanings.It
couldbeinterpretedtomean20millionpeoplehavepurchasedtheirreportfromfreeecreditreport.com;
thisparticularsiteandotheralternativesites;orthissite,otheralternativesites,plus
annualcreditreport.com.)
Page25
Asecondsetofquestionsconcernsconsumers’interpretationofthevariousclaimspresentedoncredit
reporting Websites. Forexample,whenasiteoffers“freecreditreportsandscores”doestheword“free”
refertothereportsonly,ortothereportsandscores?Howdoconsumersinterpretaphraselike“notall
freecreditreportsarethesame”?
Third,severalofthestudied Websitesstateexplicitlythatrepeatedlycheckingaperson’screditreport
doesnotnegativelyaffectaperson’screditscoresorratings,butwewerenotnecessarilyconvinced.
TheCUbuyernotedvariation(thoughslight)betweentwosupposedlyidenticalscoresatvirtuallythe
sametime,atleastraisingthepossibilitycreditscorescaninfactbeinfluencedbyrequeststoviewcredit
reports.
Fourth,giventhelargenumberofoffersbasedonthepurchaseofcreditmonitoringservices,itwouldbe
usefultoknowhoweffectivetheseservicesareinreducingtheincidenceorseverityofidentitytheft.If
creditmonitoringisnoteffectiveinalertingconsumersinatimelyfashiontounusualandunexpected
changesintheircreditreportsandscores,thencreditmonitoringservicesmaynotbewortheven$9.95
permonth,thelowestpriceforthisservice.
Intheend,itisuptotheindividualconsumer–afterconsideringpreferencesandcircumstances–to
decidewhetherthevariousservicesofferingaccesstocreditreports,scores,and/ormonitoringservices
areworththeirprice.Itiscertainlyadvantageousforconsumersthatmanyoffersinvolveafreetrial
period.Atthesametime,manyoftheseservicescouldbeseentobetakingadvantageofconsumer
ignoranceorthedesiretogetsomethingfornothing.Themajorityofconsumerswouldbewise,therefore,
tostartexercisingtheirrighttofreecreditreportsfromallthreeofthemajorcreditreportingcompanies
beforepayingforanythingelse.
REFERENCES
BetterBusinessBureau(1994).CodeofAdvertising.
/>Buckleitner,Warren(2006).CollegeTestPrepTakesaTest.Yonkers,NY:ConsumerReports
WebWatch,May1. />ConsumerFederationofAmerica(2004).“MostConsumersDoNotUnderstandCreditScoresAccording
toaNewComprehensiveSurvey.”PressRelease.Washington,D.C.September21.
/>ConsumersUnion(Undated).“HowandWhenCanIGetMyFreeConsumerCreditReport?”
/>Dixon,Pam(2005a).CallDon’tClick.WorldPrivacyForum,February24
Dixon,Pam(2005b).CallDon’tClickUpdate.July14.
FederalRegister(2006),FederalTradeCommission:AgencyInformationCollectionActivities;
SubmissionforOMBReview.Vol.71,No.250,Friday,December29,pp.7843840
FederalTradeCommission(2005).StipulatedFinalJudgmentandOrderforPermanentInjunction.
UnitedStatesDistrictCourt—CentralDistrictofCalifornia,August15.
/>ITFactsAdvertising(2007).To WebAdvertisersinMarch2007.
/>ITFactsAdvertising(2006).TopOnlineAdvertisersinNovember2005.
/>