Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (35.8 KB, 1 trang )
214
A. Nurse
The justice system’s response to egg collecting is primarily reactive,
dependent on reports of egg collections in private possession or observation
of egg collecting activity by field wardens and members of the public. In
relation to animal abuse, the involvement of NGOs without which offenders might not be apprehended provides an additional motivation for some
individuals to commit crime. For example, in a Channel Four Documentary
entitled The Egg Detectives (1991); egg collector Colin Watson blamed the
RSPB for his continued offending citing the destruction of his egg collection by the RSPB as a primary cause. A complete list of possible neutralisations employed by wildlife offenders (as with some other offenders) can be
outlined as follows:
1. The
2. The
3. The
4. The
5. The
6. The
7. The
denial of responsibility
denial of injury
condemnation of the condemners
appeal to higher loyalties
defence of necessity
denial of the necessity of the law
claim of entitlement
Different offenders may use different neutralisations and may also be subject
to different motivations (Nurse 2013a). Awareness of the illegal nature of
their actions leads to the justifications outlined by Sykes and Matza (1957)