Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (43.63 KB, 1 trang )
420
PA R T V
Central Banking and the Conduct of Monetary Policy
for a total of only $190 considerably less than the $1000 we calculated with the
simple model above. Another way of saying this is that currency has no multiple
deposit expansion, while deposits do. Thus, if some proceeds from loans are used
to raise the holdings of currency, there is less multiple expansion overall, and the
money supply will not increase by as much as our simple model of multiple
deposit creation tells us.
Another situation ignored in our model is one in which banks do not make
loans or buy securities in the full amount of their excess reserves. If Bank A
decides to hold on to all $90 of its excess reserves, no deposits would be made in
Bank B, and this would also stop the deposit creation process. The total increase
in deposits would again be only $100 and not the $1000 increase in our example.
Hence, if banks choose to hold all or some of their excess reserves, the full expansion of deposits predicted by the simple model of multiple deposit creation again
does not occur.
Our examples indicate that the Bank of Canada is not the only player whose
behaviour influences the level of deposits and therefore the money supply.
Depositors decisions regarding how much currency to hold and banks decisions
regarding the amount of reserves to hold can cause the money supply to change.
FACTO RS T HAT D ET ERM I NE T HE MO NE Y SUP P LY
Our critique of the simple model shows how we can expand on it to discuss all
the factors that affect the money supply. Let s look at changes in each factor in
turn, holding all other factors constant.
Changes in
the Nonborrowed
Monetary