Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (62.85 KB, 1 trang )
CHAPTER 16 • General Equilibrium and Economic Efficiency 599
include a minimum amount of renewable fuel each
year—a stipulation which essentially mandated a
baseline level of ethanol production.
The U.S. and Brazilian ethanol markets are closely
tied to each other. As a consequence, the U.S. regulation of its own ethanol market can significantly
affect Brazil’s market. This global interdependence
was made evident by the Energy Security Act of
1979, by which the U.S. offered a tax credit of $0.51
per gallon of ethanol to spur alternatives to gasoline. Moreover, to prevent foreign ethanol producers from reaping the benefits of this tax credit, the
U.S. government imposed a $0.54 per gallon tax on
imported ethanol. The policy has been highly effective: The U.S. has devoted more and more of its corn
(a)
2500
Million gallons
harvest to ethanol production, while Brazilian imports
(which are made from sugar cane) have declined.
While this policy has benefited corn producers, it is
not in the interests of U.S. ethanol consumers. It is
estimated that whereas Brazil can export ethanol for
less than $0.90 per gallon, it costs $1.10 to produce
a gallon of ethanol from Iowa corn. Thus American
consumers would benefit if the tax and subsidy were
removed—a move that would increase the imports
of the cheaper sugar cane-based ethanol from Brazil.
Figure 16.2 shows the predicted changes in
the ethanol market if U.S. tariffs were completely