Tải bản đầy đủ (.pdf) (1 trang)

Economic growth and economic development 283

Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (156.89 KB, 1 trang )

Introduction to Modern Economic Growth
(Uniqueness) Suppose, to obtain a contradiction, that there exist zˆ, z ∈ S, such

that T z = z and T zˆ = zˆ with zˆ 6= z. This implies

0 < d (ˆ
z , z) = d(T zˆ, T z) ≤ βd(ˆ
z , z),
which delivers a contradiction in view of the fact that β < 1 and establishes uniqueÔ

ness.

The Contraction Mapping Theorem can be used to prove many well-known results. The next example and Exercise 6.4 show how it can be used to prove existence
of unique solutions to differential equations. Exercise 6.5 shows how it can be used
to prove the Implicit Function Theorem (recall the Mathematical Appendix).
Example 6.3. Consider the following one-dimensional differential equation
(6.7)

x˙ (t) = f (x (t)) ,

with a boundary condition x (0) = c ∈ R. Suppose that f : R → R is Lipschitz

continuous in the sense that it is continuous and also for some M < ∞, it satisfies the

following boundedness condition, |f (x00 ) − f (x0 )| ≤ M |x00 − x0 | for all x0 , x00 ∈ R.

The Contraction Mapping Theorem, Theorem 6.7, can be used to prove the existence
of a continuous function x∗ (t) that is the unique solution to this differential equation
on any compact interval, in particular on [0, s] for some s ∈ R+ . To do this, consider

the space of continuous functions on [0, s], C [0, s], and define the following operator,



T such that for any g ∈ C [0, s],
T g (z) = c +

Z

z

f (g (x)) dx.

0

Notice that T is a mapping from the space of continuous functions on [0, s] into
itself, i.e., T : C [0, s] → C [0, s]. Moreover, it can be verified T is a contraction for

some s. This follows because for any z ∈ [0, s], we have
¯ Z z
¯Z z
Z z
¯
¯
¯≤
¯
f
(g
(x))
dx

f


g
(x))
dx
M |g (x) − g˜ (x)| dx
(6.8)
¯
¯
0

0

0

by the Lipschitz continuity of f (·). This implies that

kT g (z) − T g˜ (z)k ≤ M × s × kg − g˜k ,
where recall that k·k denotes the sup norm, now defined over the space of functions.

Choosing s < 1/M establishes that for s sufficiently small, T is indeed a contraction.
269



×