Tải bản đầy đủ (.pdf) (1 trang)

Economic growth and economic development 37

Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (81.91 KB, 1 trang )

Introduction to Modern Economic Growth
Sala-i-Martin estimate β to be approximately -0.02, indicating that the income gap
between countries that have the same human capital endowment has been narrowing
over the postwar period on average at about 2 percent a year.
Therefore, while there is no evidence of (unconditional) convergence in the world
income distribution over the postwar era (and in fact, if anything there is divergence in incomes across nations), there is some evidence for conditional convergence,
meaning that the income gap between countries that are similar in observable characteristics appears to narrow over time. This last observation is relevant both for
understanding among which countries the divergence has occurred and for determining what types of models we might want to consider for understanding the process
of economic growth and differences in economic performance across nations. For
example, we will see that many of the models we will study shortly, including the
basic Solow and the neoclassical growth models, suggest that there should be “transitional dynamics” as economies below their steady-state (target) level of income
per capita grow towards that level. Conditional convergence is consistent with this
type of transitional dynamics.

1.6. Correlates of Economic Growth
The discussion of conditional convergence in the previous section emphasized the
importance of certain country characteristics that might be related to the process
of economic growth. What types of countries grow more rapidly? Ideally, we would
like to answer this question at a “causal” level. In other words, we would like to
know which specific characteristics of countries (including their policies and institutions) have a causal effect on growth. A causal effect here refers to the answer to the
following counterfactual thought experiment: if, all else equal, a particular characteristic of the country were changed “exogenously” (i.e., not as part of equilibrium
dynamics or in response to a change in other observable or unobservable variables),
what would be the effect on equilibrium growth? Answering such causal questions
is quite challenging, however, precisely because it is difficult to isolate changes in
endogenous variables that are not driven by equilibrium dynamics or by some other
variables.
23




×