beware of television

It is considered that one of the greatest inventions of the twentieth
century-the television-completely changed the way of a person's life.
Television has brought into every home a lot of information and
easy-to-reach entertainment. Is its influence on the personality, family, or
children positive only or is there another side of the coin? Yes, there is.
A negative one. The effect of television depends not only on the content
of its programs, but there are more general aspects of influence of TV
viewing on intellectual activity. To make sure of that we need to look
scrupulously at every aspect of this phenomenon in general, not
emphasizing on the quality and content of its production. An
abundance of information pouring into a person's consciousness at a fast
pace does not allow him to analyze and comprehend it properly. For
example, let us make a comparison between reading and viewing. The
pace of reading, clearly, depends entirely upon the reader. He may read
as slowly or as rapidly as he can or wishes to read. If he does not
understand something, he may stop and reread it, or go in search of
elucidation before continuing. The reader can accelerate his pace when
the material is easy or less than interesting, and slow down when it is
difficult or enthralling. He can put down the book for a few moments and
cope with his emotions without fear of losing anything. Unlike
reading, the pace of the television experience cannot be controlled by the
viewer; he cannot slow down a delightful program or speed up a dreary
one. The images move too quickly. He cannot use his own imagination
to invest the people and events portrayed on the screen with the personal
meanings that would help him understand and resolve relationships and
conflicts in his own life; he is under the power of the show creators'
imagination. He becomes a passive consumer of the TV production; like
drugs or alcohol, the television experience allows the participant to blot
out the real world and enter into a pleasurable and passive mental state.
Like an addict, he puts off other activities to spend hour after hour
watching TV and finds television almost irresistible. Television affects

family life. In the early sixties almost each magazine articles about
television was accompanied by a photograph or illustration showing a
family cozily sitting together before the television set: Dad with his arm
around Mom's shoulder, children sitting around the parents. Who could
have guessed that thirty or so years later Mom would be watching a
drama in the kitchen, the kids would be looking at cartoons in their room,
while Dad would be taking in the ball game in the living room? Nor did
anyone imagine the number of hours children would eventually devote to
television or the common use of television by parents as a child pacifier.
The adult has a vast backlog of real-life experience, the child has
not. So, the influence of television on a child's consciousness is
considerably greater. "Suppose there wasn't any TV-what do you think
your child would do with the time now spent watching TV?" This question
was asked to a large number of mothers of first graders in survey
published in the Surgeon General's Report on Television and Social
Behavior. Ninety percent of mothers answered that their child would be
playing in some form or another if he were not watching television. Play
is one of the most important activities to develop a child's abilities.
Playing with others requires the child to suppress his own wishes and
desires to a certain degree, self-control must be learned. Not only must
each child discover the need to suppress certain of his own impulses, but
he must also discover the difficulties that attend the varying levels of
aggression normally existing among his playmates. The more aggressive
child must learn to find less aggressive ways to achieve his ends, while
the milder-natured child must learn to protect himself and to maintain his
integrity in the face of a more forceful companion. This horrible
time-eater, the television set, has robbed the child of his normal
opportunities to play, to talk, to do. Why don't parents restrict their
children's TV consuming? Of course, they should not prohibit it because
that would create an image of "forbidden fruit" and thus make it more

attractive. Only a wrong conception of democracy may help to explain
why they have such difficulties controlling TV. But do you allow your
three-year-old son to walk around with a sharp knife or allow your little
daughter to cross the street by herself? What's the difference between
restricting television and protecting your child from other danger that they
say they cannot control? Both are equally dangerous.I do not deny
television has its positive qualities. I would like to say only that it is a
double-edged weapon and needs to be used with caution. Some say that
everything is medicine and everything is poison, and only dose
determines what it would be. We should learn to control that real and
tangible machine in our homes, so that it does not control us.