the club

Part A
In his play The Club, David Williamson presents numerous Australian attitudes of the 1970s.
However, many of these attitudes are still relevant and fairly accurate representations of
Australian attitudes in the 1990s, although some of course have changed somewhat over the time
since the play was written nearly twenty years ago.
Tradition plays a very important part in The Club. Each of the characters of course has his own
ideas and attitudes towards tradition, but there are some which are more or less universal
throughout the play. In The Club, tradition is mainly presented as the opposite to progress and
success; that is, to achieve success in today's world, tradition must be abandoned. For example,
Laurie (the coach) blames an old Club tradition for his failure to win a premiership, 'You and your
cronies wouldn't let me buy players.' Jock (the vice-president) replies, 'We were upholding an old
tradition. It was wrong, but we believed in it.' Then in the next line, Laurie accuses Jock of
supporting the rest of the committee in upholding the tradition not because he believed in it
himself, but because he didn't want Laurie to succeed, 'They might have believed in it but the
reason why you wouldn't let the Club buy players was to stop me winning a flag.'
However, Jock does support and use tradition when it is in agreement with his goals. For example
when trying to avert a players' strike, Jock claims that former Club heroes would be disgusted by
the idea, 'I want to turn all those photographs around so they don't have to look down on this
shameful scene.' However, it is later revealed that Jock supports the buying of players and a coach
who has not played for the Club, both of which are against traditions, to ensure that the Club wins
a premiership next season. This hypocritical attitude towards tradition is probably a fairly typical
Australian attitude; traditions are upheld and honoured, but only when they do not stand in the
way of progress and success. This attitude presented by Williamson is probably even more
widespread now in the 1990s, as success is seen as being even more important today.
Attitudes towards commercialism are also explored in The Club. In the play, the Club itself is just
beginning the road to commercialisation with the purchase of Geoff Hayward (the star recruit) for
$90,000. However, Gerry (the administrator) and Jock's plans for next year not only include the
dropping of some Club traditions, but also extensive commercialisation as wealthy entrepreneurs
are recruited for sponsorship money which will be used to buy more players. The attitude of
acceptance of the commercialisation of sport that is evident in The Club is more relevant in the
1990s than ever, when all popular sports are funded mainly by sponsorship dollars from big

corporations. Even the Australian Olympic Team has received massive financial backing from
sponsors, something which is accepted and considered to be good by most people.
Power is also explored extensively in The Club; much of the play is based on power struggles
between the characters. As mentioned earlier, the power struggle between Laurie and Jock is
evidenced by Laurie's accusation that Jock supported the committee's traditional approach only to
stop Laurie from succeeding. Obviously some of the characters are much more successful than
others. For example, Gerry is able to skilfully manipulate the other characters so he can
accomplish his own hidden agenda. However the two players, Danny (the team Captain) and
Geoff, do not really become involved in these power struggles except when they aid Laurie at the
end of the play. Ted (the president) has the most obvious power at the start of the play, although
he steadily loses it throughout as the other characters strive to improve their standing. The desire
for power is basically universal, and there is resentment from those who are not in power towards
those who are. These attitudes are also still relevant in the 1990s, as shown by the recent Super
League fiasco.
Competitiveness is also an important attitude in the play one which is shared by all the
characters, to at least some extent. In addition to competing for power amongst themselves, the
characters of The Club are also fiercely competitive with the other football clubs in the league.
The fact that the Club has not been particularly successful recently and has not won a premiership
for nineteen years only strengthens the characters' competitive attitudes and desire for victory.
These sorts of competitive attitudes are realistic and still held in the 1990s. Today's society itself
is highly competitive by nature, with people competing for jobs, wealth, and success, amongst
other things.
Loyalty is also an important issue in The Club, although each of the characters is loyal in very
different degrees and ways. Some of the characters, like Danny, are fiercely loyal to others; for
example Danny threatens a players' strike if Laurie is forced to resign, 'If that bloody committee of
yours gives Laurie the boot tonight, then we don't play tomorrow.' Other characters, like Jock and
Gerry, lack loyalty to other people but are loyal to the Club as a whole. Gerry believes that,
'Loyalty to any one individual is a luxury you can't afford in a business with a multi-million dollar
turnover.' Gerry's pragmatic attitude is perhaps typical of the attitudes which are becoming
commonplace in the cutthroat business world of the 1990s.

The role of women is not explored all that extensively in The Club, but Williamson does explore
some of the attitudes relating to this issue in his play. For example, all of the characters in The
Club except Ted are of the belief that it is unacceptable for a man to commit acts of physical
violence against a woman. For example, Jock refers to the incident where Ted hit a stripper,
which forced him to resign, 'With closed fists too, you mongrel. Don't expect me to be sorry for
you.' However Jock's attitude in this case is highly hypocritical as he has admittedly bashed his
own wife. Society's attitude towards such violence against women is similarly hypocritical.
Although most men claim they would never hit a woman and are disgusted at those who do, the
rate of domestic violence shows that not enough is being done to change true attitudes towards
violence against women.
Williamson's portrayal reflects many Australian attitudes of the 1990s very accurately, even
though the play was written nearly twenty years ago. Some of the attitudes expressed, especially
those regarding the commercialisation of sport, are even more relevant today than when the play
was written, while others, such as tradition, are still equally relevant in the Australian society of
the 1990s.
Part B
The second Williamson play I chose was The Removalists. This play as well, deals with many
Australian attitudes, many of which are very accurate representations of the attitudes held by the
majority of Australians.
One of the main issues explored in The Removalists is that of police brutality. Simmonds (the
veteran police sergeant) and later Ross (a new recruit) are both excessively violent towards Kenny
(Fiona's husband), whom they eventually kill. There is an attitude of resigned acceptance towards
this brutality, as Rob (the removalist), Fiona (who was bashed by Kenny), and Kate (Fiona's sister)
are all present when Simmonds is attacking Kenny, yet none of them attempt to do anything to
stop the violence. Kenny realises that Simmonds is going to bash him further when Rob, Fiona,
and Kate have left, 'That sergeant's gonna beat the shit outa me. He's mad as a bloody snake.'
Later, when Ross goes berserk and attacks Kenny, Simmonds of course does nothing to stop the
fighting, and in fact his first question to Ross is, 'Did you let him get away?' The attitude of
Australian society at large towards police brutality is accurately portrayed in The Removalists.
People are disgusted by police brutality, yet believe that there is little or nothing they can do to

stop it. Victims still do not speak out, for fear of further harassment, which has recently been
shown by shown by testimony to the Royal Commission into Police Corruption.
Another, perhaps even more important issue explored in The Removalists is that of police
corruption. Simmonds is thoroughly corrupt, and by the end of Ross' first day on the job,
Simmonds has already managed to corrupt him as well. He explains to Ross early on that,
'Something doesn't have to be very big before it's too big for us and likewise something doesn't
have to be all that small before it's not worth worrying about,' therefore the workload at their
particular police station is quite low. Simmonds knows of a local prostitution ring, yet does
nothing to bring those involved to justice, 'Well, there's a very attractive group of young girls a
block or two from the station who, well the fact is they're very high class call girls.' Then, when
he realises that he and Ross have gone too far in bashing Kenny, he offers to organise free time
with these prostitutes for Kenny in exchange for his silence about the bashing. However when
Kenny dies from his injuries a short while later, it is Ross who goes berserk, suggesting that 'Let's
get a shotgun and make it look like suicide. Shoot his bloody head off.'
The attitudes expressed towards the extensive police corruption in The Removalists are quite
realistic. After Kenny begs Rob to call in police from another station, the removalist says, 'You
must be mad. Do you think they'd come down and collar their own mates?' The recent Royal
Commission has revealed that police corruption is a widespread and severe problem in Australia.
However, until now, attitudes have again been those of resigned acceptance, as people believed
that there was little that could be done about corrupt police, as officers stick together and most
courts believe the word of a police officer over that of the accused.
Another central issue in The Removalists is that of domestic violence. Williamson portrays issues
and attitudes surrounding domestic violence and its demoralising effects on women. For example,
Fiona says, 'It hardly inspires confidence when you're made love to one minute and bashed up the
next.' Simmonds takes the socially expected attitude of disgust against Kenny, but in reality he
has ulterior motives for even aiding Fiona and Kate at all, and he also uses it as an excuse to bash
Kenny. However, the play does make the point that although domestic violence is considered
unacceptable by most of society, it is still occurring, and little is being done to stop it.
Other important attitudes explored in Williamson's play are those of law and order, and of
anti-authoritarianism. The audience is left wondering how a society can expect law and order

when those whose job it is to enforce the law break it themselves on a regular basis.
Anti-authoritarian attitudes are also expressed, for example, when Kenny disobeys Simmonds'
orders to shut up even though he knows it will result in further bashing. Such anti-authoritarian
attitudes can be in some ways regarded as typically Australian.
The Removalists expresses a number of attitudes about Australian society including those
regarding police brutality and corruption, domestic violence, law and order, and
anti-authoritarianism. The majority of ideas presented about these are accurate representations of
the attitudes held by most Australians, and are very relevant, even today.