UCD CENTRE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH
WORKING PAPER SERIES
2012
ELA, Promissory Notes and All That:
The Fiscal Costs of Anglo Irish Bank
Karl Whelan, University College Dublin
WP12/06
February 2012
UCD SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS
UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN
BELFIELD DUBLIN 4
1
ELA,PromissoryNotesandAllThat:TheFiscal
CostsofAngloIrishBank
ProfessorKarlWhelan
UniversityCollegeDublin
February2012
Abstract:ThisisabriefingpapertheauthordistributedtotheIrishparliamentarycommittee
responsibleforfinanceandpublicexpenditure.ItdescribesthebalancesheetofIrishBank
ResolutionCorporation,theorganisationthatwasformedbycombiningAngloIrishBankandIrish
NationwideBuildingsSociety.Thenatureofthelong
‐runcosttotheIrishstateoftakingoverthe
liabilitiesoftheseinstitutionsisoutlinedandsuggestionsaremadeforreducingthesecosts.
2
1. Introduction
Itiswellkno wnthattheIrishstatehastakenonhugedebtsbytakingoverliabilitiespreviouslyowed
by privately‐owned banks, with the majority of this cost related to Anglo Irish Bank and Irish
NationwideBuildingSociety,whichhavebeenmergedtoformtheIrishBankResolutionCorporation
(IBRC).
The total cost of taking on these liabilities has been about €35 billion or 22 per cent of Ireland’s
nominalgrossdomesticproduct in 2011.Withoutthiscost,Ireland’s debt‐GDPratioin 2011could
havebeen85percent,roughlyinlinetheEurozoneaverage,ratherthanthe107
percentthatwas
recorded. It is possible that without the cost of absorbing the IBRC’s liabilities, Ireland may have
maintainedaccesstosovereignbondmarketsandthusavoidedanEU‐IMFprogramme.
It is alsowellknown thata significantfraction ofthefunds provi ded bythestate to theIBRC have
gone to pay off unsecured bondholders and, perhaps for this reason, much of the domestic and
international commentary has focused on the idea that the Irish government should change its
policyinrelationtopaymentofunsecuredIBRCbondholders.
It is worth stressing, however, that the amount of
IBRC bondholders remaining is small when
comparedwiththetotalcostofbailingouttheseinstitutions.Instead,themajordebtburdendueto
the IBRC relates to promissory notes that the Irish government has provided, which in turn are
largely being used to pay off so‐called Exceptional L iquidity Assistance (ELA)
loans that have been
providedbytheCentralBankofIreland.
ThispaperdiscussesthefiscalcostsoftheIBRCbailout.Theissuescoveredareasfollows:
ThebalancesheetoftheIBRCandthecrucialroleplayedbyitsELAdebts.
Theprocessofgrantingandrepayment
ofELAandtheroleoftheECBinthisprocess.
Thefunctionofthepromissorynotesandtheireffectonofficialdebtanddeficits.
Unfortunately, there are a lot of complex details associated with various aspects of the IBRC’s
relationship with the Irish government, the Central Bank of Ireland
and the Eurosystem of Central
Banks,sothisnotefocusesatlengthonanumberoftechnicalities.However,Iwouldflaginadvance
thatthekeypolicyimplicationisasimpleone.
There are a number of ways that the burden of the debt incurred in the IBRC bailout could
be
reduced,bothintermsofnear‐termfinancingdemandsandlonger‐termnetpresentvalue.Thekey
obstacletosucharestructuringisthatanyplanofthistypecanbeblockedbyatwo‐thirdsmajority
oftheECBGoverningCouncil.Despitetheimpressionthatthisisacomplex
issuerequiringtechnical
discussions, the key question is whether the members ofthe ECBGoverning Council arewilling to
lowertheburdenonthe Irish peopleduetheirgovernment’sdecisiontotake overtheliabilitiesof
AngloandIrishNationwideandensurethatitsdepositorsandseniorbondholderswererepaid.
3
2. TheIBRC’sBalanceSheet
TounderstandthenatureofthefiscalburdenassociatedwiththeIBRC,thebeststartingpointisthe
institution’sbalancesheet.TheIBRCwasformedonJuly1
st
2011byamergerofAngloIrishBank
andIrishNationwideBuildingSocietybothofwhichwerebeingwounddownafterhorrificlosseson
propertyloans.Table1onthenextpageillustrateshowtheliabilitysideofAnglo’sbalancesheet
evolvedoverthepastfewyearsusinginformationfrom
thebank’sannualandmid‐yearreports.
2.1. AngloIrishBank
Attheendof2007,priortothefinancialcrisisthatrockedIrelandfromlate2008onwards,Anglo
had€58.4billionindepositsand€23.6infundingfromdebtsecurities.Thesubsequentyears,amid
financialcrisisandnationalisationofthebank,sawthevastmajorityofthesedepositspulledfrom
the
bankandasubstantialreductioninfundingfromdebtsecuritiesasinvestorsviewedthebankas
toobigarisk.Combinedfundingfromdepositsanddebtsecuritiesfellfrom€82billionattheendof
2007to€19billionattheendof2010.
Someofthefundstopay
offdepositorsandbond‐holderscamefromsellingsomeofthebank’s
assetsandfromloanrepayments,whichsawthetotalsizeofthebalancesheetfallfrom€92.6
billionattheendof2007to€68.6billionattheendof2010.Butmostofthefundscamefrom
borrowing
fromcentralbanks.Atfirst,mostofAnglo’scentralbankborrowingtooktheformof
participationinstandardEurosystemrefinancingoperations.However,theseoperationsrequire
counterpartiestopledgeparticulartypesofcollateralinreturnforborrowingmoneyandAnglo
begantorunoutofeligiblecollateralastheIrishbanking
crisisbeganinlate2008.
InMarch2009,theCentralBankofIrelandagreeda“MasterLoanRepurchaseAgreement”with
AngloIrishBank,lending€11.5billionagainstcollateralthatdidnotqualifyforstandardEurosystem
monetaryoperations.
1
Thiswasthefirstofaseriesofso‐called“ExceptionalLiquidityAssistance”
loansthatweremadetothebank.(Themechanicsandlegalitiesoftheseloanswillbediscussedin
thenextsection.)Asthebankingcrisisintensifiedthrough2010,ELAborrowingsrampedup
significantly.Bytheendof
2010,Angloowed€16.9billioninEurosystemborrowingsandhad€28.1
billioninELAdebtstotheCentralBankofIreland.
InFebruary2011,AnglowasinstructedtotransfermostofitsremainingdepositstoAlliedIrish
BanksalongwiththeBank’sholdingsofabout€12billioninseniorbondsissued
toitbytheNational
AssetManagementAgency(NAMA)inreturnformostofitsportfolioofcommercialpropertyloans.
BecausetheNAMAbondshadbeenusedascollateralforEurosystemborrowings,Anglohadtopay
offmostofitsECBloans,whichfurtherincreaseditsdependenceonELAfrom
theCentralBankof
Ireland.BytheendofJune2011,Angloowed€38.4billioninELAandhadEurosystemborrowingsof
only€2.4billion.
1
Seepage102ofAnglo’s2009annualreport.
4
Table1:AngloIrishBank’sLiabilities(BillionsofEuros)
End‐2007 End‐2010 Mid‐2011
TotalLiabilities 92.6 68.6 50.7
OfWhich:
Deposits 58.4 12.1 1.2
DebtSecurities 23.6 6.9 5.7
SubordinatedDebt 5.3 0.5 0.5
OtherLiabilities 5.3 3.6 2.6
EurosystemBorrowings 0.0 16.9 2.4
ELADebtstoCBI 0.0 28.1 38.4
2.2. IrishNationwideBuildingSociety(INBS)
ThesmallerIrishNationwideexperiencedasimilarcollapsetoAnglo.AswithAnglo,anaggressive
approachtopropertylendingcombinedwithdubiouscorporategovernancepracticescombinedto
produceenormous lossesonpropertyloans,mostofwhichwerecrystallisedbythetransferofits
commercialpropertyloanstoNAMA.From2008onwards,
thebanksawacollapseinitsfunding
fromdepositsandbondmarketsandahugeincreaseinitsrelianceoncentralbankborrowing.Table
2onthenextpageshowsthatthebuildingsocietylosthalfofitsdepositfundingbetweentheendof
2007andtheendof
2010andalsopaidoffalmostallofitsoutstandingdebtsecurities.Bytheendof
2010,Eurosystemborrowingsaccountedformorethanhalfofitsliabilities.
INBSdidnotpublishahalf‐yearreportin2011,sothereisnopubliclyavailableinformationabout
howitsbalancesheetchangedin
itsfinalsixmonths.However,its2010annualreport,publishedin
May2011,reportedthatthebuildingsocietytransferred“substantiallyallofitscustomerdeposits”
toIrishLifeandPermanent,aswellasNAMAseniorbondsworth€2.9bnandotherbondsworth
€790m.ThetransferoftheseECB‐eligibleassets
meantthatIrishNationwidealsoneededtoapply
forELA,soitlikelythatthebankhadELAdebtsofapproximately€3.7billionwhenitwasmerged
withAngloonJuly1,2011toformtheIBRC.
5
Table2:IrishNationwide’sLiabilities(BillionsofEuro)
End‐2007 End‐2010
TotalLiabilities 14.6 12.2
OfWhich:
Deposits 7.3 3.7
DebtSecurities 6.7 0.6
SubordinatedDebt 0.4 0.4
OtherLiabilities 0.1 0.2
EurosystemBorrowings 0.0 7.4
ELADebtstoCBI 0.0 0.0
2.3. TheIBRC’sBalanceSheet
TheIBRChasnotyetpublishedabalancesheetbutTable3belowprovidesmyestimateofhowtheir
balancesheetwouldhavelookedonitsdateofbirth,July1
st
2011.Thishasbeencalculatedby
combiningthemid‐2011balancesheetofAnglowiththeend‐2010balancesheetofINBSand
accountingfortheshiftofdepositsandbondsfromINBStoIrishLifeandPermanent.
Asofmid‐2011,depositswereonlyaverysmallpartof
theorganisation’sliabilities,whiledebt
securitiesoutstandingweredownto€6.3billion,abouttenpercentoftotalliabilities.Thevast
majorityoftheIBRC’sdebts—€48.2billionofatotalof€58.6billion—areowedtocentralbanksand
thevastmajorityofthese(€42.2billionbymyestimate)taketheformof
ELA.
Therehasbeenaconsiderablefocusinthemediaandpopulardiscussionsonpaymentsto
unguaranteedseniorIBRCbondholders.However,asofJune2011,only€2.9billionoftheIBRC’s
debtsecuritieswereunguaranteedandunsecuredseniorbonds.SinceJune2011,therehavebeena
seriesofpaymentson
thesebonds,includinga$1billionbondthatwaspaidoutinOctober2011
anda€1.25billionbondthatwaspaidoutinJanuary2012.Asaresultofthesepayments,
unguaranteedunsecuredseniorbondnowaccountforlessthan€1billionoftheIBRC’sdebts.So,at
thispoint,
ifthereistobeasignificantreductionintheburdenimposedbytheIBRContheIrish
public,itwillneedtocomefromsomewhereelsethandefaultingontheremainingunguaranteed
6
seniorbonds.Specifically,itwillrequireanewapproa chtodealingwiththeIBRC’sdebtstocentral
banks.
Theleft‐hand‐sideofTable3explainswheretheIBRCistogettheresourcestopayoffitsliabilities
asitwindsdown.Ithastwoprincipaltypesof
assets.First,thereareloanstocustomers.Second,
thereareaseriesofpromissorynotesfromtheIrishgovernmentthatwereprovidedtoAngloand
INBSduring2010.ThesepromissorynotesarecurrentlyvaluedontheIBRC’sbalancesheetat€28.1
and(aswillbediscussedlater)arecurrently scheduledto
provideaseriesofpaymentsoverthenext
20years.
Animportantaspectofthisbalancesheetisthatwithoutthepromissorynotes,theIBRCwouldhave
sufficientassetstopayoffallofitsdeposits,itsbondholders,itsEurosystemborrowingsandallofits
otherdebtsapartfromELA.
Only€14.1billionofthe€42.2billionELAdebtscouldbepaidoffifthe
bankdidnothavethepromissorynotes.Thus,akeypointtounderstandaboutthefuturecostof
IBRCtotheIrishpublicisthat,effectively,thepromissorynotesonlyexisttopayofftheELA
debtsto
theCentralBankofIreland.
Table3:EstimatedIBRCBalanceSheetatMid‐2011(BillionsofEuros)
Assets Liabilities
PromissoryNotes 28.1 Deposits 1.1
Loans 27.5 DebtSecurities 6.3
Other 3. 0 SubordinatedDebt 0.7
OtherLiabilities 2.3
Eurosystemborrowings 6.0
ELADebtstoCentralBank 42.2
Total 58.6 Total 58.6
7
3. TheABCsofELA
ThissectiondiscussestheprocessbywhichExceptionalLiquidityAssistanceisissuedandmoveson
tothevariouslegalandaccountingissuerelatedtotheissuanceandrepaymentofELA.
3.1. MoneyCreationandCentralBankBalanceSheets
BeforedescribingthespecifictopicofELA,itisworthclarifyinghowtheprocessofmoneycreation
worksintheEurosystem.ItiscommontoseemediareportsstatingthattheEuropeanCentralBank
isprovidingfundstothebankingsystem.Techn ically,however,thisisn’ttrue.TheECBitselfdoesnot
lendmoneydirectlytobanks.Rather,theEurosystem’srefinancingoperationsinwhichitsupplies
liquiditytoEurosystembanksareconductedonadecentralisedbasisbythenationalcentralbanks
oftheEurosystem.
Wheredothenationalcentralbanks(NCBs)getthismoneyfrom?Theansweristhattheydon’tget
itfromanywhere.Theprocessworksasfollows.EverybankintheEurosystemkeepsaso‐called
“reserveaccount”withitscentralbankandth isaccountcanbeusedtowritechequestocreditorsor
torequestcashfromthenationalcentralbanktouseinATMmachines.Whenabank
obtainsaloan
aspartoftheEurosystemrefinancingoperations,itreceivesthefundsviaitsNCBcreditingits
reserveaccount.Thisistextbookmoneycreationinwhichmoneyisconjuredoutofthinair.
Eachofthenationalcentralbanksreportsonamonthlybasishowmuchmoneythey
havecreatedin
thisfashionwhentheyreleasetheirbalancesheet.Ahighlystylisedcentralbankbalancesheetis
producedbelow.
StylizedCentralBankBalanceSheet
Assets Liabilities
Assetsacquiredbymakingloansandbuying
securities
Moneycreatedbymakingloansandbuying
securities
Someotherassets CentralBankCapital
Ontheleft‐hand‐side,thebalancesheetdescribestheassetsthatthecentralbankhasacquiredvia
moneycreationinadditiontoasmallamountofadditional
assetsthatitmayhaveacquiredover
timeindependentofitsmoneycreationactivities(e.g.transfersfromthefiscalauthority).While
centralbankswillhaveholdingsofgoldandothersecurities,formostcentralbanksthelargest
categoryofassetsistheloansthatithasmadetobanks.
8
Theright‐hand‐sideofthebalancesheetshow sthetotalamountofmoneythatthecentralbankhas
createdovertimeaswellastheresidualvaluebywhichthebank’sassetsexceedthemoney
created,whichisusuallytermedthecentralbank’scapital.Notethatifthe
assetsacquiredvia
moneycreationriseorfallovertimerelativetotheiroriginalvaluewhenacquired,thencentralbank
capitalneednotcorrespondtothevalueofassetsacquiredindependentofmoneycreation.
Theright‐hand‐sideofthebalancesheetisoftendescribedasillustratingthecentralbank’s
liabilities.
However,itisworthstressingthatacentralbank’sliabilitiesarequitedifferentfromthose
ofanyprivateentity.Acentralbankthatprintsafiatcurrencythatpeoplewishtousefor
transactionscannevergooutofbusiness.
Suppose,forexample,thatacentralbankprintsoffmoney
toacquiregoldandthepriceofgoldthen
plunges.Inthiscase,thevalueofthecentralbank’sassetsmaywellfallbelowtheamountofmoney
thatithascreated,sotheentryfor“CentralBankcapital”wouldbenegative.Onecouldinthiscase
labelthecentralbank
asbeing“insolvent”insometechnicalsense.However,thisisnotan
insolvencythatcorrespondstoanyprivatesectorversionofthisconcept.Aslongasthebankcan
createmoneythatpeoplewishtouse,itcanpayoffanydebtsthatfalldueandhonourallofits
obligations.
3.2. CollateralandRisk‐SharingforEurosystemOperations
Bythesecommentsaboutthelackofimportanceofcentralbankcapital,Iamnotintendingtoargue
thatcentralbanksshould beabletoprintmoneyforwhatevertasktheywishandnotworryabout
the consequences.The ability to create money is an extremely powerful tool and needs to
be
carefully monitored. In particular, within acommon currency area,it is particularly important that
each participating member state is not seen to be particularly responsible for fuelling inflation by
abusingitspowertocreatemoney.
Forexample,forcountriesfacedwiththeproblemoffailingbankssufferingadeposit
run,itmaybe
tempting to provide such banks with loans from the central bank so that private creditors and
depositorscanbepaidoffandthenallowforslow(orno)repaymentoftheseloans.However,such
a policy could be inflationary and would be open to accusations of corruption
and abuse of the
moneycreationpower.
To prevent such abuses, the Eurosystem’s refinancing operations take the form of repurchase
agreements that are handled in a way that is designed to prevent losses on money creating
operationsofthetypejustdescribedabove.
The Eurosystem’s repurchase agreements involve banks temporarily
supplying financial assets to
their local NCB as collateral in return for loans, with the terms of these loans set by the ECB’s
GoverningCouncil (consistingof the seventeennationalcountrygovernorsand the sixmembersof
the ECB Executive Board) at its monthly monetary policy meeting. Haircuts are applied to
the
collateralsothattheamountthatisloanedtotheborrowingbankislessthanthevalueofthe asset,
9
with the amount that can be loaned increasing with the quality of the collateral.
2
Should a bank
defaultonitsloansfromanNCB,thecollateralframework isintendedtoseetheNCBstillleftwith
anassetthathasthesamevalueastheloan.
That said,no risk‐control framework cancompletely rule out the possibility of losses on monetary
operations.For
example,LehmanBrothershadborrowed€8.5billionfromEurosystemcentralbanks
when it entered bankruptcy and it was thought at first that there could be large losses on these
loans. (In fact, recent media reports suggest the gradual sale of the pledged collateral will come
close to recouping the full amount
of money loaned.)
3
More seriously, the Eurosystem has now
loanedlargeamountstobanksthathaveusedEuropeansovereignbondswithlowcreditratingsas
collateralandhasalsoengagedinlargedirectpurchasesofthesebondsonthesecondarymarket.
TheofficiallegalstatutegoverningtheEurosystemisquitevagueaboutthe
implicationsforanNCB
of losses incurred in monetary operations. Article 32.4 simply states “The Governing Council may
decidethatnationalcentralbanksshallbeindemnifiedagainstcostsincurredinconnectionwiththe
issue of banknotes or in exceptional circumstances for specific losses arising from monetary policy
operationsundertakenfor
theESCB.”Inpractice,theGoverningCounciloftheECBusedthedefaults
by Lehmansand otherbanksin2008to clarifyinastatementin March2009that losses should be
sharedinfullbytheEurosystemNCBsinproportiontotheirECBcapitalkeyshares.
4
NotethatdespiteregularcommentarypointingtotherelativelysmallsizeoftheECB’scapitalbase
oflessthan€10billion,theactualamountavailabletotheEurosystemtoabsorblossesonmonetary
operationsissignificantlylarger:AsofFebruary2012,theEurosystemhasacombined€81billionin
capital
andreservesandanadditional€394billionin“revaluationaccounts”thatcanalsobeusedto
absorblosses.
Still, this does raise the question of what would happen should one or more Eurosystem central
bankshavetheircapitaleliminatedbylossesonoperations.Perhapssurprisingly,asfarasIcantell,
the legal structures underpinning the Eurosystem don’t discuss this eventuality. Article 27.1of the
ECB Statute requires each NCB to have its accounts audited by independent external auditors
recommended by the Governing Council and approved by the Council but it does not state what
should happen if the Governing Council
is unhappy with the accounts.Still, it is generally
understood that NCBs would need to be “recapitalised” by fiscal transfers from their national
government.
3.3. ELA,MonetaryFinancin gProhibitionandtheECBGoverningCouncil
TheEurosystemallowsforabroadrangeofassetstobepledgedascollateralinitsrefinancing
operations.However,from2009onwards,eachoftheIrishbankscoveredbystateguarantees
exhaustedtheirstockofeligiblecollateralandwouldhavedefaultedonbondsorfailedtohonour
2
SeeEuropeanCentralBank(2011)foradetaileddiscussionoftheoperationalframeworkformonetarypolicy
intheEuroarea.
3
SeethisreportfromtheFinancialTimes,datedJanuary20,2012.
www.ft.com/cms/s/0/30d1a26e‐42b8‐11e1‐93ea‐00144feab49a.html.
4
Seepressreleaseherewww.ecb.int/press/pr/date/2009/html/pr090305_2.en.html.
10
depositwithdrawalswithoutadditionalhelp.ThathelptooktheformofsomethingtheCentralBank
ofIrelandterms“ExceptionalLiquidityAssistance”butwhichtherestoftheworldcalls“Emergency
LiquidityAssistance”—either wayit’sELA.Thisassistancetakestheformofloansthatareprovided
tobankswhopledge
collateralthatitisnotacceptableforEurosystemoperations.
TounderstandthelegalbasisforELA,onehastostartwiththeobservationthatallofthenational
centralbanksintheEuroareawerefoundedpriortothestartofEMUandthuseachhavepre‐
existinglegalpowersand
obligations.Somearegivenvariousregulatoryandsupervisorypowers
whilesomearenot.Moreimpo rtantly,itiscommonfornationalcentralbankstobegivenanexplicit
setofpowersrelatedtofinancialstability.
TheActcurrentlygoverningtheCentralBankofIrelandgivesitageneralpowertolend
against
securitytocreditinstitutionsandalsoprovidesitwithanexplicitfinancialsecurityobjective.Thus,
theoriginallegalbasisfortheBank’spowertoprovidebankswithELAtopreventabankfromfailing
andtriggeringfinancialstabilityproblemscomesfromIrishlaw.
Thisdoesnotmean,however,thatthe
BankhascompletefreedomtooperateitsELAprograms
howeveritwishes.AnumberofdifferentlayersofEurosysteminvolvementareworthflagging.
First,in2005,thebankingsupervisoryauthorities,thecentralbanksandtheFinanceMinistriesof
theEuropeanUnion(EU)haveagreedonaMemorandumofUnderstandingon
co‐operationin
financialcrisissituations.ThisMoU,whichisnotapublicdocumentnorlegallybinding,consistsofa
setofprinciplesandproceduresforcross‐borderco‐operationandlikelyincludesagreementabout
theuseofELA.
Second,the2008ECBConvergenceReportofferstheopinionthat“National
legislationforeseeing
thefinancingbyNCBsofcreditinstitutionsotherthaninconnectionwithcentralbankingtasks(such
asmonetarypolicy,paymentsystemsortemporaryliquiditysupportoperations),inparticularto
supportinsolventcreditand/orotherfinancialinstitutions,isincompatiblewiththemonetary
financingprohibition.”
5
HowexactlytheECB’sdefinesof“temporaryoperations”isunclear.
Third,anarticleintheECB’sFebruary2007MonthlyBulletinstatesthat“theEurosystemalsohas
proceduresinplaceregardingtheprovisionofELAtoindividualcreditinstitutionsintheeuroarea,
whichareundertheresponsibilityofthenational
centralbanks(NCBs).Theseproceduresareaimed
atensuringanadequateflowofinformationwithintheEurosystemtothedecision‐makingbodiesof
theECB.Inthisway,theimpactofanELAinterventiononaggregateliquidityconditionsintheeuro
areacanbemanagedinamannerconsistentwith
themaintenanceoftheappropriatesingle
monetarypolicystance.”
6
Finally,andmostcrucially,Article14.4ofthe“ProtocolontheStatuteoftheEuropeanSystemof
CentralBanksandoftheEuropeanCentralBank”states“Nationalcentralbanksmayperform
functionsotherthanthosespecifiedinthisStatuteunlesstheGoverningCouncilfinds,byamajority
oftwothirds
ofthevotescast,thattheseinterferewiththeobjectivesandtasksoftheESCB.”
7
5
Seewww.ecb.int/pub/pdf/conrep/cr200805en.pdf
6
Seewww.ecb.int/pub/pdf/mobu/mb200702en.pdf
7
Seewww.ecb.int/ecb/legal/pdf/en_statute_2.pdf
11
Tosummarise,theECBmustbeconsultedwhenELAisissuedanditwillassesswhethertheissuance
ofELAinterfereswithitsmonetarypolicystance.TheECBalsoviewsloanstoinsolventcredit
institutionsandnon‐temporaryliquiditysupportprogrammesasillegal.AndtheGoverningCouncil
canvote
atanytimebyatwo‐thirdsmajoritytostopanyELAprogramme.
Forthesereasons,theECBhasbeenheavilyinvolvedinthedesignoftheELAprogrammefromthe
start.Forexample,itislikelythattheECBapprovalwasrequiredinrelationtothepayment
structureofthe
promissorynotesthatIBRCisusingascollateralforELAloansandwhichprovides
thefundswithwhichELAwillberepaid.Inaddition,theECBlikelysoughtvariousassurancesthat
ELAwouldberepaidsuchasthe(apparentlylegallynon‐binding)“lettersofcomfort”sentfromthe
Ministerfor
FinancetotheGovernoroftheCentralBankoneachoccasionanewELAprogramme
wasinitiatedindicatingtheintentionthattheELAwouldberepaidandtheprovisionofso‐called
“facilitydeeds”whichtheCentralBankannualreportasprovidingagovernmentguaranteein
relationtorepaymentofELA.
8
Inpractice,itappearsthatELAcreditisprovidedtobanksforaveryshortperiodoftime(acoupleof
weeks)andtheECB’sGoverningCouncilregularlyconsiderswhethertostoptheprogramme.In
addition,theECB’sviewontheneedforsolvencyofinstitutionsinreceiptofELA
meansthatmost
likelytheymustapproveofanyrestructuringoftheassetsofsuchabank,suchasachangeinthe
termsoftheIBRC’spromissorynote.
3.4. Target2andIntra‐EurosystemAssetsandLiabilities
BeforedescribingthemechanicsofhowexactlyELAworksandhowitaffectsthebalancesheetof
theCentralBankofIreland,ithelpstodescribeoneaspectitsbalancesheetinabitmoredetail.
Intra‐EurosystemBalances
Onthenextpage,I’veproducedaslightlylessstylisedcentral
bankbalancesheetthantheone
describedbefore.Itislessstylisedinthatititemisesthedifferentsub‐componentsthatcorrespond
towherethemoneycre atedbyacentralbankendsup.
Thethreesub‐componentslistedhereare:Reserveaccounts,banknotesandIntra‐Eurosystem
liabilities.Thefirsttwo
ofthesecomponentsaresimpleenough;thelastone,unfortunately,isoften
misunderstood.
Whenacentralbankcreatesmoneyviaaloantoafinancialinstitution,itcreditsthatbank’s
reserveaccount.Thisshowsupasincreasedliabilitiesonthecentralbank’sbalancesheet,
withtheloanshowingup
asacorrespondingentryontheassetside.
Iftheborrowingfinancialinstitutionrequestsadeliveryofbanknotes,theirreserveaccount
isdeductedbytheamountdeliveredandthe“banknotes”entryonliabilitysideofthe
8
Copiesofmostofthelettersofcomfort,whichwereobtainedviaaFreedomofInformationrequestbyRTE,
areavailableatwww.rte.ie/news/2011/0718/centralbank‐business.htm.
12
centralbankbalancesheetiscredited.Thereisnochangetotheassetsideofthecentral
bankbalancesheet.
ASlightlyLessStylizedEurosystemCentralBankBalanceSheet
Assets Liabilities
Assetsacquiredbymakingloansandbuying
securities
“CentralBankCapital”
Someotherassets Moneycreatedbymakingloansandbuying
securities
Ofwhich:
ReserveAccounts
BankNotes
Intra‐EurosystemLiabilities
ThatbringsustoIntra‐Eurosystemliabilities.Thisitemisbestexplainedviaatransactioninwhich
a
depositor(callhimJean)withanIrishbank(callthem“Anglo”)requeststhat€100betransferred
fromtheiraccounttoadepositaccountwithaFrenchbank(callthem“SocGen”).Thisworksas
follows:
Jean’sbankaccountisdeducted,reducingAnglo’sliabilitiesby€100.
Atthesametime,
AngloinstructstheCentralBankofIrelandtodeduct€100fromitsreserve
accounttosendthefundstoSocGen.
ThereductioninAnglo’sdepositaccountwiththeCentralBankofIrelandreducesthis
componentoftheBank’sliabilitiesby€100.However,theCentralBankofIreland
immediatelyincreases
anentrylabelled“Intra‐EurosystemLiabilities”.
ViatheEurosystem’sreal‐timepaymentssystem,Target2,theBanquedeFrancethen
receiveseithera€100credittoits“Intra‐EurosystemAssets”ora€100reductioninits
“Intra‐EurosystemLiabilities”dependingonwhetheritisanIntra‐Eurosystemcreditoror
debtor.
Offsettingthis€100improvementinitsbalancesheet,theBanquedeFrancecredits
SocGen’sreserveaccount,thusincreasingSocGen’sassets.
SocGenthencreditsJean’sdepositaccountwiththatbank.
NotethatfromJean’spointofview,allthathashappenedisthathis€100hasgonefromhisIrish
bankaccounttohisFrenchbankaccount.However,thewaypaymentssystemsactuallyoperate,
therehavebeensixdifferentoffsettingtransactionsthathaveoccurredalongtheway.Most
13
importantlyforthepurposesofthispaper,theassetsideoftheCentralBankofIreland’sbalance
sheethasnotchangedbuttheliabilitysideshows€100lessinreserveaccountsand€100morein
Intra‐Eurosystemliabilities.AsimilarchangewouldhaveoccurredifAnglohadwrittena
chequeto
payoffabondholderwithadepositaccountoutsideIreland.
TheseIntra‐Eurosystembalancesaverag etozero.ThosecountrieswithIntra‐Eurosystemliabilities
payinterestontheseliabilitiesattherateoftheEurosystem’smainrefinancingrate(currently1per
cent).ThisinterestisaccumulatedattheECBand
redistributedtothosecountrieswithIntra‐
Eurosystemcredits.
AnAside:The“Target2Debate”
Ashasnowbeenwelldocumented(e.g.pages34and35oftheBundesbank’sMarch2011Monthly
report)themovementsofdepositsassociatedwiththebankingandsovereigncrisesofrecent years
havegeneratedverylargeIntra‐
EurosystemliabilitiesincountriessuchasIrelandandaparticularly
largeIntra‐EurosystemcreditfortheBundesbank.
Itisbeyondthescopeofthispapertodiscussthevarioustechnicalissuesthathaveariseninrelation
totheIntra‐Eurosystemflowsthathavebeengeneratedbythecapitalflightfromthe
peripheryto
thecore.However,Iwouldnotethatanumberofeconomistshavereceivedsubstantialmed ia
attentionformisleadingclaimsrelatingtotheBundesbank’sIntra‐Eurosystemcredits.
Inanumberofcontributions(ofwhichSinnandWollmershäuser,2011,isthemostcomprehensive)
Hans‐WernerSinnoftheIfoInstitute
hascharacterisedtheBundesbank’sIntra‐Eurosystemcredits
as“TargetLoans”.Thischaracterisationisunhelpfulinrelationtobothwordsemployed.
Asdescribedabove,thepurposeoftheTargetsystemistoseethatJeancantransferhis
€100fromhisIrishaccounttohisFrenchaccount.Sinnhasproposeda
numberofwaysto
restricttheoperationoftheTargetsystem.Byrestrictingthefreemovementofcapitalwith
theEurozone,theseproposalsareeffectivelyacalltoendthecommoncurrency.
Thesecreditshavenoneofthecharacteristicsofloans.Theyarenotinstigatedbythe
Bundesbanksupplying
itsownfundstotheCentralBankofIreland.Rather,theyrepresenta
transferoffundsoutofIrelandtowardsGermany.
Morerecently,anumberofmediacommentatorshavefocusedontheideathatGermanyissubject
toanenormouscreditriskinrelationtoapossible“default”onitsIntra
‐Eurosystemcreditsinthe
eventofaEurobreak‐upandconsequentlargefiscalco stsofaBundesbankinsolvency.Thesefears
areunfoundedfortworeasons.First,thevariousEurosystemcentralbanksretainsufficientassetsto
allowforafullandfinalsettlementoftheIntra‐Eurosystembalancesifsuch
wererequired.Second,
asnotedabove,concernsaboutinsolvencyofcentralbanksareunfoundedprovideditprintsafiat
currencythatpeoplewishtohold.OnecanbesurethatintheeventofacompleteEurobreakup,
theBundesbankwillfindplentyofdemandforitscurrency.
14
3.5. IssuanceandRepaymentofELA
HereIwanttodescribethemechanicsofhowELAissuanceworksaswellaswhathappens
afterwardsinrelationtointerestandprincipalrepaymentsonELA.
Issuance
ThereasonIhavedescribedIntra‐Eurosystemtransactionsinsuchdetailisthattherehasbeensome
confusioninmediaandpolitical
circlesinrelationtothenatureoftheELAissuance.Anumberof
mediastorieshavereportedthat“theELAmoneywasborrowedfromtheECB”.Thisisnotthecase.
TheECBdoesnotissuemoneyatallasthistaskisdelegatedintheEurosystemtonationalcentral
banks.
Amoresubtleversionofthe“ELAwasborrowedfromthe ECB”claimwasprovidedinananswertoa
parliamentaryquestionbytheIrishMinisterforFinance,MichaelNoonan,onJanuary31,2012.
9
Mr.
Noonanstatedthat“ELAisitselffundedbytheCBIthroughIntra‐Eurosystemliabilities”.
Theword“funded”canhaveanelasticmeaning.However,thisanswersuggestsaninterpretationin
whichtheappearanceofanELAassetontheCentralBankofIreland’sbalancesheetisaccompanied
byan
increaseinIntra‐Eurosystemliabilities.Itismyunderstandingthatthisisnotthecase.Atthe
momentof“conception”,sotospeak,oftheELA,thecorrespondingincreaseinliabilitiesisacredit
tothereserveaccountofthebankreceivingtheELAloans.Onlyifthatbankthenuses
itsELAfunds
totransfermoneytobankaccountsoutsideIrelanddoestheCentralBankofIreland’sbalancesheet
starttoshowanincreaseinIntra‐Eurosystemliabilities.
BecausetheIBRCappearstohaveusedthevastmajorityofitsELAloanstopayoffforeign
bondholdersandpeoplemoving
theirdepositsoutsideofIreland,thereislittledoubtthatthe
issuanceofELAhasledtoasignificantincreaseintheCentralBank’sIntra‐Eurosystemliabilities.
However,itisnotaccuratetodescribetheELAashavingbeeneither“borrowedfromtheECB”orto
describeanincreasein“Intra
‐EurosystemLiabilities”asthesourceofthefunds.
IshouldemphasisethatinpointingoutthatELAfundswerenotborrowedfromtheECBortherest
oftheEurosystem,itremainsthecasethattheECBGoverningCouncilcaninsistonanendtothe
ELAprogrammeatany
pointandisalsolikelytorequireconsultationinrelationtoanyproposals
thatwouldinvolvechangestothenatureoftheIBRC’sassets.
InterestPaymentsonELA
TurningfromELAissuance,toitsrepayment,afirstquestionrelatestotheinterestratesthatthe
CentralBankofIrelandchargeson
itsELAloans.TheBankhasnevercommentedpubliclyonthis
interestrate.GiventhatELAisnormallyissuedattimesoffinancialcrisisanditsmereexistencemay
beaverysensitivematter,itislikelythattheyarefollowingEurosystemguidelinestoadoptthe
FightClubapproachto
communicationsonELA(“ThefirstruleofELAis:YoudonottalkaboutELA”).
9
Seewww.kildarestreet.com/wrans/?id=2012‐01‐31.767.0&s=mathews#g774.0.q
15
Despitethisofficialapproach,AngloIrishBank’srecentreportshavenotedthattheinterestrateon
itsELAloansislinkedtotheECBmarginallendingfacility,whichiscurrently1.75percent.In
addition,theCentralBankofIrelandreported€510millioninELAinterestin2010in
itsannual
report,whiletheentryfor“Otherassets”averaged€21.3billionin2010.Dividingtheinterestbythe
averagevalueofotherassetssuggestsaninterestrateof2.4percent.Giventhatthemarginal
lendingfacilityratewas1.75percentthroughout2010,myguessisthattheformulaused
to
determinetheELAinterestrateissomethinglike“marginallendingfacilityplus75basispoints.”
GiventhattheCentralBankiscurrentlypayingoutinterestof1percentonbothmoneyheldin
reserveaccountsandonIntra‐Eurosystemliabilities,thisraisesthequestionofwhathappenstothe
profitsincurredviatheestimated75basispointspreadchargedonELA.
ProfitsrelatingtoEurosystemmonetarypolicyoperationsaresharedamongthevariousnational
centralbanks.However,asfarasIcantell,thisisnotthecaseforprofitsassociatedwithELA
operations.Ifthisiscase,thenthe
75basispointmargincanberemittedatsomepointbythe
CentralBankofIrelandbacktotheExchequer.
ThismeansthattheultimateinterestcosttotheIrishstateoftheELAfundingthatissuppliedtothe
IBRCisthemainECBrefinancingrate,whichiscurrently
onepercent.
ELARepayments
WhatoccurswhenELAprincipalisrepaidbytheIBRC?Therearetwopotentialscenarios.Inthefirst,
theCentralBankofIrelandmaintainsitsbalancesheetsizeexactlyasbeforeandsimplyaddstoits
stockofassets;forexample,theycouldpurchasegold
orsecurities.Profitsfromtheseinvestments
couldeventuallybereturnedtotheIrishstate.
Inthesecondscenario,theCentralBankdoesnotacquireanynewassetsbutsimplyreducesthesize
ofitsbalancesheet,markingdownboththevalueofitsELAassetandthevalueofitsliabilities.
This
isthescenariothatactuallyoccurs.
Thegraphbelowshowswhathashappenedoverthepastfewyearswiththe“OtherAssets”
categoryontheCentralBankbalancesheet,whichprimarilyconsistsofELA.Afterreachingapeak
of€70billioninFebruary2011,thedeleveragingprogrammesofthe
Irishbanks(sellingassetsand
takinginloanproceedsandthennotlendingthemoutagain)haveallowedthemtorepayELAso
thatbyDecember2011,“OtherAssets”haddeclinedto€44billion(seechartbelow).Itappears
nowthatalmostalloftheoutstandingELAisowedbythe
IBRC.
Tables
4
ofFebr
u
ofsecur
reserve
Liabiliti
e
Indeed,
ofELAe
Thatth
e
money
t
somep
u
andthe
states,
s
thestat
e
circulati
theser
e
10
Seew
w
4
and5sho
w
u
ary2011an
ities,golda
n
accounts.T
e
s,thecateg
o
inthesame
ndupreduc
e
ELAgoest
o
t
hatithascr
u
blicdiscuss
i
passingoft
h
s
omehavec
o
e
.Therealit
y
on.Effectiv
e
e
payments.
w
w.kildarestr
e
w
howthese
d
dDecembe
r
n
dotherclai
hus,thedec
o
rythatincl
u
parliament
a
ingIntra‐Eu
r
o
wardsredu
c
eated—isi
m
i
onofthisis
s
h
ismoneyo
n
o
ncludedth
a
y
isthatthe
w
e
ly,itisasif
e
et.com/wra
n
d
evelopme
n
r
2011respe
msandvery
lineof€26
b
u
desIntra‐E
a
ryanswern
r
osystemlia
b
c
ingtheCen
m
portantbe
c
s
ue.Becaus
e
n
theCentra
a
tthesetra
n
w
henIBRCr
itisbeingb
u
n
s/?id=2012‐
0
16
n
tsalteredt
h
ctively.The
littlechang
e
b
illioninELA
urosystemli
otedabove,
b
ilities.
10
tralBank’sl
i
c
auseitcorr
e
e
thepayme
lBankareb
o
n
sactionsar
e
epayitsELA
u
rned:Ther
e
0
1‐31.767.0&
s
h
eCentralB
a
rewasasm
a
e
inbankno
t
hastranslat
abilities:Thi
MichaelNo
o
i
abilities—e
f
e
ctsamisco
n
ntofmoney
o
thtransact
e
completely
debts,that
e
isnohidde
n
s
=mathews#
g
a
nk’sbalanc
e
a
lluptickin
t
t
esorthea
m
edintoade
scategoryf
e
o
nanhassa
i
f
fectivelyre
d
n
ceptionth
a
bytheIrish
ionsinvolvi
n
circularand
moneyissi
m
n
benefitto
t
g
774.0.q
e
sheet,des
c
t
heBank’sh
o
m
ountheldi
n
clineinOth
e
e
llby€30bil
i
dthatrepa
y
d
ucingthea
m
thasappea
r
Exchequert
n
garmsoft
h
havenone
t
m
plytakeno
t
heIrishsta
t
c
ribingit
o
ldings
n
e
r
lion.
y
ments
m
ountof
r
edin
oIBRC
h
eIrish
t
costto
utof
t
efrom
17
Table4:CentralBankofIrelandBalanceSheet,February2011(BillionsofEuros)
Assets “Liabilities”
EurosystemLending117 Banknotes 12
Securities,gold,otherclaims 21 Reserveaccounts 9
Otherassets(mainlyELA) 70 OtherLiabilities185
CapitalandReserves 2
Total208 Total208
Table5:CentralBankofIrelandBalanceSheet,December2011(BillionsofEuros)
Assets “Liabilities”
EurosystemLending107 Banknotes 13
Securities,gold,otherclaims 25 Reserveaccounts 6
Otherassets(mainlyELA) 44 OtherLiabilities 155
CapitalandReserves 2
Total176 Total176
18
4. PromissoryNotes
TherehasbeenconsiderablepublicdiscussioninIrelandabouttheideaofrestructuringtheIBRC’s
promissorynotes.However,IthinkitisimportantthatthepriorissuesrelatingtotheIBRC’sbalance
sheet,thenatureofitsELAdebtsandtheroleplayedbytheECBGoverningCouncilareestablished
before
onecanaddressthekeyissuesrelatingtoanypotentialrestructuringofthenotes.
4.1. PaymentStructure
During2010,itbecameapparentthatAngloandIrishNationwidehadtwoseriousproblems.The
firstwasaliquidityproblem;bothinstitutionswerelosingdepositsandhadnoaccessto
internationalbondmarkets.Inaddition,therewasasolvencyproblem,asitbecameclearthatboth
institutionshadsufferedenormouslosses
onproperty‐relatedloans.
TheliquidityproblemwaslargelysolvedbyissuingtheAngloandINBSlargerandlargeramountsof
ELA.Thesolvencyproblemwastrickier.Ifthestatewasgoingtoseethatdepositors,bondholders
andELAdebtswereallrepaid,wherewasitgoingtogetthe
moneyfrom?AsconfidenceintheIrish
statefinanceswanedduring2010,itwasclearthattherewasnowaythatthegovernmentcould
obtaintheenormoussumrequiredtorestoretheIBRCorganisationstosolvency—€31billionor20
percentofGDP—byborrowingfromfinancialmarkets.
Thusthedecisionwastaken
tosupplytheIBRCinstitutionwithassetsworth€31billionintheform
ofpromissorynotes.TheseareeffectivelyIOUsfromtheStatetotheIBRCthatpromisetopay
moneyaccordingtoanagreedschedule.
Table6reportsthefullscheduleoftotalpaymentsonthenotesthathave
beenissuedasdescribed
inananswertoaparliamentaryquestioninSeptember2011byMinisterNoonan.
11
Thefirstthing
tonoteaboutthescheduleisthatitdiffersfrom,forexample,afixed‐ratemortgageinthatthe
annualpaymentschangeovertime:
Thepaymentsare€3.1billionperyeareveryyearonMarch31throughto2023(thefirst
paymentwasmadewithoutmuch
fanfareonMarch31,2011).
Apaymentof€2.1billionisduein2024.
Paymentsof€0.9billionayearareduefrom2025‐2030.
Afinalpaymentof€0.1billionisduein2031.
Inrelationtotheinterestpayments,thesearedealtwithsomewhatlike
afixed‐ratemortgage.An
annualinterestchargeisappliedtotheoutstandingprincipalandthereductionintheprincipal
outstandingequalstheannualpaymentminusthecalculatedinterest.Anexceptionisthetreatment
ofinterestintheyears2011‐2013,wherealowerrateofinterestwasapplied(noneat
allin2012).
Thenoteswereissuedgraduallyoverthecourseof2010andweregiveninterestratesthatwere
similartotheratesthenprevailingonIrishgovernmentbonds.(Theseratesrosesharplyoverthe
11
Availablehere />19
courseof2010.)Thedeferralofinterestover2011‐2013thenmeantthatforthebondstostillpay
outtheinteresttotalsoriginallyagreed,theinterestrateappliedfortheremainderofthepayment
schedulewouldbeapproximately8percent.Thus,onceinterestonthenotesisapplied
atthislevel
in2014,therewillbeaninterestchargeof€1.8billion,whichwillgraduallydeclineinlateryears.
ItisclearthatthispaymentstructurewastacitlyagreedtobytheECBGoverningCouncil,whoare
thereforeawarethatIBRCwillnotbeabletopaybackits
ELAformanyyears.Indeed,the
promissorynotecouldbesaidtorepresentanimplicitlong‐termtimetableforELArepayment.
Table6:PromissoryNotePaymentSchedule
TotalInteres
t
Repayments TotalCapital
Reduction
TotalAmount
Outstanding
31/3/2011 0.6 3.1 2.5 28.1
31/3/2012 ‐ 3.1 3.1 25.0
31/3/2013 0.5 3.1 2.6 22.4
31/3/2014 1.8 3.1 1.2 21.2
31/3/2015 1.7 3.1 1.3 19.9
31/3/2016 1.7 3.1 1.4 18.5
31/3/2017 1.5 3.1 1.5 17.0
31/3/2018 1.4 3.1 1.6 15.4
31/3/2019 1.3 3.1 1.7 13.7
31/3/2020 1.2 3.1 1.9 11.8
31/3/2021 1.1
3.1 2.0 9.8
31/3/2022 0.9 3.1 2.2 7.6
31/3/2023 0.7 3.1 2.3 5.3
31/3/2024 0.6 2.1 1.5 3.8
31/3/2025 0.4 0.9 0.5 3.3
31/3/2026 0.4 0.9 0.5 2.8
31/3/2027 0.3 0.9 0.6 2.2
31/3/2028 0.3 0.9 0.6 1.6
31/3/2029 0.2 0.9 0.7 0.9
31/3/2030 0.1 0.9 0.8 0.1
31/3/2031 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
TOTALS 16.8
47.9 30.6
20
4.2. TheLong‐RunIrrelevanceoftheInterestRateontheNotes
Muchofthemediacommentaryonthepromissorynoteshasfocusedontheirhighinterestrateand
suggestedthat areductioninthisrateshouldbethefocusofanyeffortstoreducetheburdenof
IBRCdebtonthetaxpayer.Inparticular,therehasbeenconsiderablefocusonthefact
thatthefull
totalofscheduledpaymentsonthenotesis€48billiononceinterestpaymentsareaddedtothe€31
billionprincipal.
Itshouldbestressed,however,thatlowering oftheinterestrateonthenoteswilldolittletoreduce
thelong‐runburdenoftheIBRCdebt
ontheIrishstate.Indeed,verylittleofthe€17billion
differencebetweenthepaymentstotalof€48billionandtheprincipalof€31billionrepresentsanet
costtothestate.
Toseethispoint,itisworthworkingthroughthestructureofpaymentsthatwehaveoutlined:
Promissory
notepaymentsareultimatelybeingusedbytheIBRCtopayoffELAtothe
CentralBankofIreland.IBRCthusneedsanadditional€28billiontorepaytheprincipalonits
ELAdebts.
IBRCalsoneedstopayinterestonitsELA.However,theELAinterestrateis
approximately
2.5percent,soanyadditionalinterestpaymentsabovethisratewillrepresentaprofitfor
IBRCwhichcanultimatelybereturnedtothestate.
TheCentralBank,inturn,currentlypaysaninterestrateofonepercentonitsreserveand
Intra‐Eurosystemliabilities,soitisalsomaking
aprofitofanestimated150basispointson
itsELAloanswhichcanalsobereturnedtothestate.
Puttingthesepointstogether,itturnsoutthatonlyasmallfractionoftheinterestpaymentsonthe
promissorynotesrepresentanetcosttothestate.
Anotherwayto
seethispointistoconsiderhowlongitwilltakethepromissorynotepaymentsto
clear€28.1billioninELAdebt(effectively,I’massumingthattheIBRC’sotherassetswillbeusedto
payoffallotherliabilitiesandtheadditionalELAestimated aboveat€14.1billionatmid‐2011).
Table7providesascheduleforhowtheIBRCcanusetheannualpaymentsonitspromissorynotes
toreducetheamountofELAoutstanding.IhaveassumedthattheELAinterestrate,whichis
ultimatelylinkedtotheECB’smainpolicyrate,willnotremainaslowas2.5%
foreverandhaveset
outascheduleinwhichitwillmoveuptowards4.5%andthenstaythere.
Accordingtothesecalculations,thecurrentschedulewouldmeanthatIBRCwillbeabletopayoffits
ELAdebts(withpresumablyallotherdebtslonggone)in2022.Atthatpoint,
thegovernmentcould
winduptheIBRCandsimplycanceltheremainingpayments.Noteherethatthetotalamountof
promissorynotepaymentsinthisexamplewouldbe€37billion.Theadditional€11billionin
paymentsscheduledafter2022justwouldn’thappen.
Thus,theintensefocusonthetotalrepayments
figureof€48billionismisplacedandany
restructuringofthepromissorynotesthatissoldashavingthebenefitofreducingthe€48billion
figuretosomethinglowerwillactuallybedoingverylittletoreducethelong‐termburdenofthe
IBRC.
21
Table7:ANotionalScheduleforRepaying€28.1BillioninELAUsingPromissoryNotePayments
ELAInterestRate Repayments InterestPayments TotalAmount
Outstanding
31/3/2011 0.025 3.1 0.78 28.1
31/3/2012 0.025 3.1 0.70 25.7
31/3/2013 0.025 3.1 0.64 23.3
31/3/2014 0.030 3.1 0.70 20.7
31/3/2015 0.035 3.1 0.73 18.3
31/3/2016 0.045 3.1 0.82 15.8
31/3/2017 0.045 3.1 0.71 13.4
31/3/2018 0.045 3.1 0.60 10.9
31/3/2019 0.045 3.1 0.498.3
31/3/2020 0.045 3.1 0.375.6
31/3/2021 0.045
3.1 0.25 2.7
31/3/2022 0.045 2.8 0.12 0.0
4.3. TheShorter‐TermRelevanceoftheInterestRateontheNotes
Whiletheamountofinterestpaidonthepromissorynoteshaslittlelong‐runimpact,theseinterest
paymentsaresettohaveanunfortunateimpactontheIrishbudgetaryprocessoverthenextfew
years.ThisimpactrelatestoEurostat’saccountingtreatmentofthepromissorynotes.
Eurostat’saccruals‐basedaccountingfor
budgetdeficitscountedthefull€31billionprincipalofthe
promissorynotesonIreland’sgeneralgovernmentbudgetdeficitin2010.Theinterestpaymentson
thepromissoryno tesarethencountedonthegeneralgovernmentdeficit(GGD)intheyearsthat
theyoccur.However,Eurostat’srulesallowfordebtinstrumentsto
have“interestholidays”inwhich
nointerestischargedandthepromissorynotesweredesignedwithsuchaholidayperiodover
2011‐2013.
12
Whenthisperiodisscheduledtoend,theinterestpaymentsonthenotewillgofromhavingno
impactontheGGDthisyeartoa€500millionimpactin2013anda€1.8billionimpactin2014.Even
thoughthecashflowimpactofthenoteswillnotchange
duringtheseyears,thegovernmentwill
needtofindanadditional€1.8billioninspendingcutsandtaxincreasesoverthenexttwoyearsifit
istosticktoitsofficialtargetsforthismeasureofthedeficit.
12
SeethisDepartmentofFinanceinformationnotereleasedinNovember2010:
www.finance.gov.ie/documents/publications/reports/2010/noteprommissory2010.pdf
22
5. PotentialPolicyOptions
Thissectiondiscussesthereasonsinfavourofrestructuringthepromissorynotes,outliningmy
preferredoptionsforrestructuringaswellasthepotentialargumentsthatarelikelytolevelled
againstthisapproachbymembersoftheECBGoverningCouncil.Ialsoprovidesomeargumentsfor
changingtheIBRC’saccountingtreatmentof
thenotes.
5.1. WhyRestructurethePromissoryNotes?
Beforeconsideringpolicyoptionsforchangingthestructureofthepromissorynotes,itisworth
emphasisingwhysucharestructuringisdesirable.
TheEuropeanCommission’slatestreportonIrelandprojectsthattheIrishdebt‐GDPratiowillpeak
at119percentattheendof2013,justasthestate
issettorunoutofitsEU‐IMFfunding.Thisdebt
ratioiswellbeyondlevelsthathavetraditionallybeenconsidereddangerous,evenpriortothe
recentexampleofprivatesectorsovereigndebtrestructuringwithintheEurozonesetbyGreece.As
currentlystructured,thereislittledoubtthatthe
IBRC’spromissorynoteswillrepresentasignificant
negativefactorinrelationtofinancialmarket’sassessmentofthesustainabilityofIreland’sdebt
burdenatthattime.
Ihaveprojectedabovethat,basedonthecurrentscheduleandthenatureofIBRC’sELAdebts,
Irelandissettomakeitstwelfthandlast
promissorynotepaymentin2022.Effectively,the
promissorynotesactliketwelvedifferentzero‐couponbondswithmaturitiesrangingfromoneto
twelveyears.Thus,theeffectiveaveragematurityofwhatisleftofthisdebt,whichaccountsfor
twentypercentofGDP,isaboutfiveyears.
Combinedwithan
averagematurityasofMarch2012onIreland’sexistingprivatedebtofabout€80
billionofaboutsixandahalfyears,thismeansthatIrelandwillhaveverysignificantfunding
requirementsoverthenextfewyears,evenbeforeoneconsiderstheincrementalborrowing
associatedwithbudgetdeficits.
13
ItisthefirmhopeofIreland’sEurozonepartnersthatIreland,whichiswidelypraisedforits
willingnesstoimplementausteritymeasures,beabletoaccesssovereigndebtmarketsby2013.Any
stepsthatcanbetakentohastenIreland’sdeparturefromtheEU‐IMFprogrammeareinthe
interests
ofboththeEurozonememberstatesandtheIrishpeople.Areductioninthefunding
burdenassociatedwiththepromissorynotesrepresentsarelativelysimplewaytotakesuchastep.
13
Calculationsbasedoninformationinwww.ntma.ie/GovernmentBonds/Daily_Bonds_Outstanding. pdf
23
5.2. WhattheIrishGovernmentShouldLookFor:PaymentDeferral
Anysuccessfulnegoti atin gstrategyrequiresacleargoal.Inthecaseofthepromissorynotes,the
Irishgovernmentshouldbeproposingtorestructurethenotessothereisno€3.1paymenttoIBRC
onMarch31,2012orforanumberofyearsafterthat.Thiswouldreducethestate’sfunding
requirementsoverthenextfewyearsand,byreducingthenetpresentvalueburdenofthisdebt,
helptoconvinceinvestorsthatIreland’s120percentdebt‐GDPratioisnotasonerousasitlooks.
Forhowmanyyearsshouldthepromissorynotepaymentsbedeferred?Clearly,froman
Irish
perspective,theidealanswerwouldbetodeferthepaymentsaslongaspossiblebut,giventhe
needforagreementfromtheECBGoverningCouncil,thisisunlikelytobeobtained.Aslightlyless
strongapproachwouldbetolinkthebeginningofpromissorynotepaymentstoquantitative
benchmarksin
relationtotheperformanceoftheeconomy:Forexample,thatpaymentswould
beginwhennominalGDPhasrecovereditspre‐crisispeakandunemploymenthasfallenbelowten
percent.AnevenweakerapproachwouldbetosuspendrepaymentsuntilIBRChasusedupallits
non‐promissoryassets.Asnoted
above,theIBRCwouldbeabletorepayapproximately€14billion
overtimeinELAevenifitwasneverreceivedanypromissorynotepayments.
Whataretheobstaclestothegoalofpaymentdeferral?Anyonewhohastakenapassinginterestin
thisissuewillknowbynowthatthe
Irishgovernmentis“havingtechnicaldiscussionswiththe
troika”aboutthisissue.ThetruthisthattheECBGoverningCouncilistheonlybodythatreally
mattersforthisquestion.Ifaplantorestructurethepromissorynoteswasacceptedbythe
GoverningCouncil,thenitisveryunlikelythat
theeithertheCommissionortheIMFwouldobject.
WhatobjectionsmightGoverningCouncilmembershavetorestructuringthepromissorynotes?In
reality,membersoftheCouncilhavebyandlargeavoidedcommentingonthisissue(partlybecause
theyarerarelyasked.)Butitislikelythatobjectionstakethefollowing
form:
TheMoralHazard/SlipperySlopeArgument:Ifpromissorynoterestructuringleadstoa
slowerpaceofrepaymentofELA,thenothercountriesmayalsoseektouseELAtobailout
theirbankingsystemsandtheconsequencesmaybeinflationary,violatingtheECB’sprimary
policyobjectiveofpricestability.
TheLegalisticArgument:ItislikelythatvariouslawyersandcentralbankersattheECBand
nationalcentralbanksbelievethattheexistingELAprogrammefortheIBRCcomescloseto
violatingtheirunderstandingofthemonetaryfinancingprohibitionarticleintheTreaty.For
theseindividuals,anychange
tothecurrentarrangementshouldnotbeconsideredbecause
itmayrunintolegaldifficulties.
The“What’sYourProblem?”Argument:ManyEuropeanpoliticiansandcentralbankersare
fondofpraisingIreland’sEU‐IMFprogrammeasagreatsuccess.Fortheseindividuals,they
wouldprefertowaittoseefirm
evidencethattheprogrammehasgoneofftrackbefore
acceptingtheneedto changeanyofitskeyaspects.
24
Eachoftheseargumentsareworthrespondingto:
ELAprogr ammes needtheacquiescenceandco‐operationoftheGoverningCouncil.TheECB
wasstronglysupportiveofprovidingfundstopayoffbondholdersanddepositorsatfailing
IrishfinancialinstitutionsonthegroundsthatthesedecisionspromotedEuro‐area
financial
stability.Howe ver,theIrishELAprogrammedoesnotrepresentaslipperyslopetofrivolous
ELAprogr ammes acrosstheEurozonebecausetheGoverningCouncilcansimplychooseto
saynotofuturerequeststhatitdoesnotsupport.
SlowrepaymentofELAdoesnotcauseinflation.TheELAmoney
hasalreadybeenprinted
anddidlittletostokeEurozoneinflation.Choosingtorepaythemoneymoreslowlywillonly
contributetoEuro‐areainflationarypressuresifthemonetaryaggregatesareexpanding
morerapidlythantheECBiscomfortablewith.Atpresent,growthinEuroareaM3isvery
slow.If
inflationbecomesaconcern,theGoverningCouncilcouldmakedeferredrepayment
ofELAconditionaloncontinuedslowgrowthintheEuroareamoneysupply.
Thelegalisticargumentsagainstrestructuringthenotesarerelativelyweak.IBRCisasolvent
institutionthatisbeingprovidedwithsufficientfundstorepayall
ofitsdebtsovertime.A
deferralofELAdoesnotchangethatsituationandsoitdoesnotbringusclosertomonetary
financingofaninsolventinstitution.AndanyprogrammetopaybacktheELAeventually
technicallycountsasatemporaryprogramme.
Inrelationtothe“What’s
YourProblem?”approach,itcouldbearguedthatnowisthetime
tolooktobuildonwhateverpositivemomentumisthereinrelationtothesuccessofthe
Irishprogramme.WiththeEuroareaeconomyapparentlyenteringrecession andIrish
exportsweakening,Irelandislikelytoneedanimproved
dealfromtheEUiftheprogramme
istotrulysucceed.
5.3. AccountingTreatmentofPromissoryNotes
Aseparateissuefromthekeygoalofachievingasignificantdeferralofpromissorynotepaymentsis
theaccountingtreatmentofthepromissorynotes.
Therehasneverbeenanofficialexplanationofwhythepromissorynotesneededtocarryasimilar
yieldaswasprevailingonIrishgovernmentbondsin2010.
ANovember2010DepartmentofFinance
notereportedthat“ForcapitaladequacypurposesthePromissoryNotesmustbevaluedatparinthe
institutions’accounts.Accordingly,interestmustaccrueonanyamountdueuntilitispaid.The
interestratechargedisbasedonthelongtermGovernmentbond
yieldappropriatetowhenthe
amountswillbepaid.”
Effectively,theapproachtakenin2010wastovaluethepromissorynotesaccordingtoa“mark‐to‐
market”approachsimilartohowbanksvaluebondsthatarekeptintheir“tradingbooks”.However,
mostEuropeanbanksallocatethemajorityoftheir
sovereignbondstotheirso‐called“banking
books”whichisintendedforassetsthatareheldtomaturity.AstheEuropeanBankingAuthority