Tải bản đầy đủ (.pdf) (47 trang)

English Writing Skills pptx

Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (1.17 MB, 47 trang )

English Writing Skills
張森林教授
台大財金系
General Guidance
1. When writing a paper, you should
– Make sure you have a contribution
– State it explicitly and clearly
– Make connection with related literature
– Follow conventional styles
– Aim for a high level of presentation
– Use clear English
– Do not make papers too long
– Do not use unedited thesis material
Useful Tips
2. It may be useful to
– Prepare a folder (e.g. a collection of most relevant
papers) for a research project
– Establish your own list of widely used terminology,
notation, phrases, etc.
– Use Endnotes to edit the references
– Copy and adjust the sentences of well written papers
Introduction
3. Devote half the writing time to the introduction
and conclusion
– Once the ideas of a publishable paper are roughly
formulated, writing should be done within a month.
Otherwise, you lose interest. You may even forget
about the entire paper.
– About half of your writing time should be devoted to
writing the main body of the paper, which should be
done first.


– The remainder of your effort should be devoted to
writing the introduction and conclusion.
Introduction (cont.)
4. Get their attention early
– Provide evidence of why it is interesting (i.e., why it
should be published) in the introduction.
– If an apple does not taste good at the first bite, one
simply throws it away without giving any thought on
the nutritional value hidden in the apple.
– Likewise, most referees make up their mind at the first
bite, i.e., within 15 minutes of reading a paper.
– If the referees don't like a paper, they begin to look for
reasons to justify why the paper should be rejected.
Introduction (cont.)
– If the referee loses interest from reading the
introduction, he/she might postpone reading the
paper.
– If a paper is set aside, it could be several months later
when the referee picks up the paper again, probably if
and when he/she receives a reminder about the
review. This is one of the major reasons why it takes
a long time to get a report.
– Do not repeat the concluding remarks in the
introduction.
Introduction (cont.)
5. The introduction should be two pages or less
– If the introduction is more than two pages, it is too
long.
– Shorten it to 2 pages or 1/6 of the paper, whichever is
less.

– If you write more than two pages, then either
• you are discoursing a lot about other people, in which
case you are sending a signal that your contribution is
minor, relative to the literature, or
• you are discussing too many technical details, which do
not belong in the introduction.
Introduction (cont.)
6. Discuss real world examples
– Pass the relevance test by providing citations,
statistics, or anecdotes of real world examples.
– Then the referee cannot say the paper is
uninteresting, the most common reason for rejection.
– If the referee says it is not interesting, it is a value
judgment and there is no appeal! No editors will
publish an uninteresting paper.
– One important purpose of the introduction is to
prevent the referees from making that disparaging
remark.
Introduction (cont.)
– Without this sound footing in the real world, your
paper may give the impression to readers that it
provides a profound solution to nonexistent problems.
7. Imitate skillful writers
– Observe how other successful writers introduce their
topic, cite literature, and get on with their task.
– Imitate their words and phrases, and modify them to
suit your purpose.
– It is easier to imitate what someone else has written
than to create a totally new paragraph.
Introduction (cont.)

8. Do not plagiarize
– The word “plagiarize” means to “steal and pass off as
one’s own (the ideas or words of another).”
(Webster’s Third International Dictionary, 1986)
– Remember Robert Fulghum’s advice “Don’t take
things that aren’t yours.”
– If you do, you will pay dearly later when your work is
published. You are lucky if the paper is not published!
– If you are quoting statements made by another writer,
use identifying quotation marks.
Introduction (cont.)
– Some people suggest that one should not copy more
than three consecutive words without identifying
quotation marks. This is extreme advice that no one
can follow.
– Do not copy, but summarize the contributions of other
writers in your own words to the extent that they are
related to the subject of your paper.
– Mention the cited author with year of publication in the
text and give the exact source in the reference
section.
Introduction (cont.)
9. Do not use I
– Some authors do get away with I.
– Referees are generally biased against egocentric
persons.
– Take the writing task seriously, not yourself.
– “The paper achieves ” sounds softer and more
humble than “I did this.”
– Avoid starting a paragraph with I.

Introduction (cont.)
10. Create a packet of related articles for each
paper
– All cited and other related papers must be at hand.
– This practice saves time, especially when writing the
introduction and conclusion, and when you revise the
paper.
– If you maintain the background packet, you do not
have to go to the library every time you revise the
paper.
Introduction (cont.)
11.Treat others generously
– Emphasize the importance of the paper being written,
but not at the expense of others. They are probably
your referees and they are sensitive.
– Don’t hit people (Robert Fulghum). Do not hurt their
feelings.
– When mentioning the works of other persons, avoid
using negative terms.
– Examples:
• "The deficiency of Smith's approach is ”
• "The problems of these papers “
– Papers that attack others are likely to be rejected,
especially when the authors or their friends become
your referees.
Introduction (cont.)
12. Avoid predominantly citing your own works
– The referees may think you are a self-centered clod.
There are others who have contributed to the
literature.

– If the first page only mentions your past work, and not
that of others, it means either
• you are probably digging into an area in which no one
else is interested—this implication is bad—or
• you are an egotist who disregards the contributions of
others, which is even worse.
Introduction (cont.)
13.Cite the papers of potential referees in the
introduction
– In many situations, whether your paper is accepted or
not primarily depends on who referees it.
– If you offend the referee by your thoughtless
comments, this paper and many of your future papers
will have no place to go.
– Important references should be mentioned in the first
page.
– Hopefully, the editor will read the first page (or the
next) when choosing the referees.
Introduction (cont.)
– The editor may choose referees from those
mentioned in the introduction and references.
– Works of potential referees should be mentioned in
the introduction, rather than buried deep in footnotes
or the main body.
14.Give (accurate) credit generously to the most
likely referees
– Be generous to all authors cited, but particularly to
those who are likely to be referees.
– Explain why their works are significant for your
analysis.

Introduction (cont.)
– Write one or two sentences about the contributions of
each of the most likely referees and how their works
are related to yours.
– This takes up less than 1% of the space, but it can
affect the probability of acceptance significantly.
15.Find quotations from well-known authors
– This strategy increases the credibility of the paper.
– For instance, if John Maynard Keynes or Kenneth
Arrow said something about the topic, it is difficult for
the referee to argue that your paper is uninteresting.
Introduction (cont.)
– Quoting a live, famous person is more effective; his or
her students might be referees.
– Do not quote dead people too often; they won't be
your referees. (No pun intended.)
– Do not quote yourself. This implies narcissism or lack
of exposure to the thinking of other economists.
16.Do not be apologetic
– You may acknowledge the limitations of the approach
only once in the conclusion.
– But do not apologize for what the paper cannot do.
– The more you mention to the referees what the paper
does not do, the less contribution it seems to make to
the literature.
Preparing the Main Body
17. Prepare a rough outline before writing
– Sketch briefly the content of each section. Then
generate the text. Smooth out the connections.
Without this rough blueprint, the paper often evolves

in a different direction than you intended.
– This blueprint reduces the chances that you will lose
direction and dwell too much upon minor points.
– This sketch needs to be changed as you go.
Preparing the Main Body (cont.)
18.Start writing before the paper is finished in your
head
– The precise connection of words from beginning to
end cannot be done in your head, except by a few
geniuses like Shakespeare.
– A 15-page paper may contain about 4 - 5,000 words.
Writing a paper is like stringing pearls to make a
necklace. There is an optimum order for these pearls
to form a paper, and some pearls are better left out.
– Begin the main body of the paper with empirical or
theoretical results. Then create the introduction and
conclusion.
– Tables and references may be added as needed.
Preparing the Main Body (cont.)
19.Do not read too much
– Do not read too much before you begin to write. It can
interfere with your own thinking and writing.
– Imagine how much time a prolific writer would spend
reading the contributions of other people.
– It is impossible to read every paper ever written on a
subject.
– Remember your goal is to write and publish a paper,
not to read everything.
– You have other important things to do (e.g., taking
care of spouse and children)!

Preparing the Main Body (cont.)
– If your family is neglected, what good is your paper?
– If you read a dozen papers on a topic, you should
have enough material to write a paper. Now add
your own ideas to this base of knowledge.
20.Develop consistent and simple notations
– Invest enough time to design efficient notations for
your papers.
– Do this not just for one paper, but for most of your
papers. This helps you remember when you revise a
paper.
– If the notations are confusing, the paper cannot be
very illuminating.
Preparing the Main Body (cont.)
– Each paper may have some notations that are
specifically tailored for the task. But the variables
should come from a well-designed and consistent
set of notations so that you may readily remember
what they stand for.
21. Strike a balance between theory and
applications
– A theoretical paper should say something about
policies, applications, or empirical work.
– An empirical paper should say something about the
theory that led to the empirical work.
– Check the preferences of the journals that you are
considering.
Preparing the Main Body (cont.)
22.Divide long paragraphs
– If there are two or more ideas in a single paragraph,

split them up.
– Break up long paragraphs even if they contain a
single idea.
– Readers tend to skip long paragraphs. They
discourage referees and readers from reading the
paper.
– The eyes of readers are subconsciously looking for
open space. This is why important equations should
be displayed, rather than buried in the text.
– No paragraph should be longer than half a page.
– As a general rule, a paragraph should have more
than two sentences.

Tài liệu bạn tìm kiếm đã sẵn sàng tải về

Tải bản đầy đủ ngay
×