100 model essays for IELTS writing task 2

Jadon Nguyen

100 MODEL
ESSAYS
for
IELTS Writing


100 Model
Essays
for
IELTS Writing
Task 2

By: Jadon Nguyen


Contents
Part 1: Argumentative/Opinion/Agree or Disagree essays .................................................. 3
Part 2: Discussion essay .................................................................................................... 24
Part 3: Causes and Effects /Problems and Solutions essays .............................................. 44
Part 4: Advantages / Disadvantages essays ....................................................................... 64
Part 5: Two-part question essays ....................................................................................... 84


Part 1: Argumentative/Opinion/Agree or Disagree essays
1. "Prevention is better than cure". Researching and treating diseases is too costly, so
it would be better to invest in preventative measures.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Model answer (Band 8):
In the contemporary world, the adage "prevention is better than cure" has gained significant

relevance, especially within the sphere of healthcare. With the escalating costs associated
with medical research and treatment, a prevailing argument asserts that it is wiser to
allocate resources toward preventive measures. While I concur with the idea that
prevention holds substantial importance, I also believe that a balanced approach,
combining both prevention and treatment, is essential for a comprehensive healthcare
system.
On one hand, it is irrefutable that investing in preventative measures can yield substantial
long-term benefits. Disease prevention through measures such as vaccination campaigns,
health education, and lifestyle modifications not only saves lives but also reduces the
financial burden on healthcare systems. For instance, initiatives promoting healthy dietary
habits and regular exercise can mitigate the prevalence of lifestyle-related diseases like
obesity and diabetes. These diseases, once contracted, often necessitate expensive medical
interventions, thus diverting significant resources from other healthcare needs. Therefore,
directing funds toward prevention can be viewed as a judicious and cost-effective strategy.
However, it would be overly simplistic to assert that prevention should completely
overshadow treatment. Several factors support this notion. Firstly, not all diseases are
preventable. Many conditions are rooted in genetics or result from factors beyond an
individual's control, making treatment the sole viable option. Secondly, medical research
and the development of treatments have led to substantial advancements in healthcare.
Diseases that were once considered incurable are now manageable owing to ongoing
research efforts. This underscores the importance of investing in both prevention and
treatment to cater comprehensively to healthcare requirements.
Moreover, a disproportionate emphasis on prevention should not come at the expense of
necessary healthcare infrastructure and treatment facilities. In certain instances, prioritizing
prevention may lead to a resource deficit for timely and effective treatment. This can result
in a paradox where individuals are cognizant of preventive measures but lack access to
quality healthcare when needed, ultimately defeating the purpose of prevention.
In conclusion, while "prevention is better than cure" is a valid maxim, the extent to which
one should agree with this statement in the context of healthcare is nuanced. A balanced
approach that combines investment in preventive measures with adequate resources for

research and treatment is indispensable for a comprehensive healthcare system. By doing
so, we can effectively address both the root causes and consequences of diseases, ensuring
a healthier and more sustainable future for all.

2. With the increased global demand for oil and gas, undiscovered areas of the world
should be opened up to access more resources.
To what extent do you agree?
Model answer (Band 8):
The escalating global demand for oil and gas has ignited discussions about the ethical and
practical implications of tapping into previously unexplored regions to satiate this demand.
While there are undeniable economic and energy security advantages to such exploration,
the environmental and long-term repercussions must be taken into account. In this essay, I
will delve into the various facets of this issue and argue that while limited exploration may
be warranted, it should be closely regulated to mitigate environmental harm.
On the one hand, the argument for opening up undiscovered areas for oil and gas
exploration is anchored in the economic benefits it presents. The energy sector plays a
pivotal role in driving economic growth and employment in many nations. By accessing
new reserves, countries can fortify their energy independence and concurrently generate
employment opportunities. This surplus supply can also contribute to stabilizing global
energy prices, delivering benefits to consumers and businesses alike. Essentially, these
resources can be pivotal in sustaining economic development.
Nevertheless, this approach is not without significant environmental risks and
consequences. The process of exploring and extracting oil and gas in previously untouched
areas can lead to irreparable harm to ecosystems, endangering biodiversity and
exacerbating climate change. Potential adversities encompass oil spills, habitat
degradation, and the emission of greenhouse gases. Moreover, the enduring environmental
impact of exploiting these resources can far outweigh the immediate economic gains,
especially given the pressing issue of accelerating climate change and its cascading effects.

To strike a delicate equilibrium between economic interests and environmental
preservation, stringent regulations and safeguards must be instituted. Governments and
international bodies must ensure that exploration and extraction activities conform to the
highest environmental standards. This involves conducting comprehensive environmental
impact assessments, implementing rigorous monitoring mechanisms, and deploying
advanced technologies to minimize environmental harm. Furthermore, a substantial
portion of the revenue derived from these activities should be funneled into the
development of clean and sustainable energy alternatives, effectively mitigating the longterm environmental consequences.


In conclusion, while there exists a compelling rationale for exploring previously
undiscovered areas for oil and gas to meet the surging global demand, this endeavor should
be approached judiciously and responsibly. Economic benefits can be realized, but not at
the expense of irreversible environmental degradation. Rigorous regulations and
substantial investments in clean energy alternatives should accompany any such
exploration to secure a more sustainable and harmonious future.

3. We live in a world of technology these days. While the internet brings with it clear
advantages, the problems in terms of control and security of information outweigh
the advantages.
To what extent do you agree?
Model answer (Band 8):
In our contemporary era, technology, particularly the internet, has become an integral part
of daily life. While the internet has brought about undeniable advantages, there is a growing
concern regarding the control and security of information. In this essay, I will discuss the
extent to which I agree with the notion that the problems associated with information
control and security outweigh its advantages.
There is no denying that the internet has revolutionized the way we access and disseminate
information. It has democratized knowledge, enabling people worldwide to access a vast
repository of information with ease. The advantages are manifold: it facilitates

communication across vast distances, allows for rapid sharing of knowledge, and supports
online education and remote work, especially important in today's interconnected world.
Furthermore, the internet has been a catalyst for innovation, fostering the growth of ecommerce, online entrepreneurship, and various digital industries, contributing
significantly to economic development.
However, as the saying goes, "with great power comes great responsibility." The internet's
vastness and accessibility have given rise to significant concerns over control and security.
Cyberattacks, data breaches, and privacy infringements have become commonplace.
Governments and corporations often exert control over internet content, which can lead to
censorship and infringement on freedom of expression. The spread of fake news and
disinformation has eroded trust in online information sources, posing threats to informed
decision-making.
Moreover, the collection and misuse of personal data by tech giants and advertisers have
raised serious concerns about individual privacy. The Cambridge Analytica scandal, for
example, highlighted the potential for exploitation of personal information for political
purposes. As more aspects of our lives become interconnected through the internet of things
(IoT), security vulnerabilities grow, making us susceptible to cyber threats on a personal
and societal level.


In this context, it is evident that there are substantial problems related to information
control and security in the digital age. However, it would be an oversimplification to claim
that these issues outweigh the advantages of the internet. The solution lies not in eschewing
technology but in addressing these challenges through legislation, cybersecurity measures,
and public awareness campaigns.
Governments and international bodies must enact robust data protection laws and
regulations to safeguard individual privacy and hold tech companies accountable for
mishandling data. Moreover, investments in cybersecurity infrastructure are paramount to
mitigate cyber threats and protect critical systems. Finally, media literacy and digital
education programs can empower individuals to discern reliable information from
misinformation and make informed choices in the digital realm.

In conclusion, while there are undeniably problems concerning the control and security of
information in the digital age, I do not believe that these issues outweigh the advantages
offered by the internet. The key is to strike a balance by addressing these concerns through
a combination of legal frameworks, cybersecurity measures, and informed digital
citizenship. This way, we can harness the benefits of technology while safeguarding our
privacy and security in an increasingly interconnected world.

* Listen to this essay:

4. Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence, while others
think that intelligence can be measured in other ways.
What is your opinion?
Model answer (band 7):
The assessment of intelligence has long been a subject of debate, with some asserting that
success is the primary gauge, while others argue that there are alternative methods to
measure intelligence. In my view, success can be a valuable indicator of intelligence, but
it should not be the exclusive measure, as intelligence encompasses a broader spectrum of
abilities.
Success, often characterized by achievements in one's career, personal life, or academic
endeavors, undoubtedly reflects a degree of intelligence. Accomplished individuals often
possess problem-solving skills, adaptability, and the capacity to effectively apply their
knowledge, all of which are indicative of intelligence. However, it is essential to recognize
that intelligence takes many forms.


Intelligence extends beyond conventional success metrics to encompass diverse faculties
such as creativity, emotional intelligence, and practical skills. For example, a gifted artist
or musician may not attain the same level of traditional success as a business executive,
yet their creative intelligence is unmistakable. Similarly, emotional intelligence, involving
the ability to understand and manage emotions, represents a crucial aspect of intelligence

that may not always correlate with external achievements.
Moreover, intelligence should not be confined solely to external accomplishments, as it
also encompasses the pursuit of knowledge and personal growth. An individual who
continuously seeks to expand their understanding of the world, regardless of their level of
success, demonstrates a type of intelligence rooted in curiosity and a thirst for learning.
This intrinsic motivation for knowledge contributes to personal enrichment and wellroundedness, even in the absence of high-profile achievements.
In conclusion, success can serve as a valuable indicator of intelligence, but it should not be
viewed as the sole measure. Intelligence is a multifaceted concept that encompasses a range
of aptitudes and capabilities, including creativity, emotional intelligence, and a genuine
passion for learning. A comprehensive approach to measuring intelligence should
acknowledge and appreciate the diverse array of human talents and abilities, extending
beyond conventional success criteria.

5. Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered
species while others think it is a waste of valuable money.
What is your opinion?
Model answer (Band 7):
The allocation of financial resources for the protection of endangered species is a
contentious issue, with some advocating for increased spending in this area while others
argue that it represents a wasteful use of valuable funds. In my opinion, dedicating more
money to safeguarding endangered species is a worthwhile endeavor, provided it is done
efficiently and with a focus on conservation efforts that yield tangible benefits.
Firstly, supporting the protection of endangered species is essential for the preservation of
biodiversity. Biodiversity is crucial for the health and stability of ecosystems, as each
species plays a unique role in maintaining the balance of nature. The loss of any species
can have far-reaching ecological consequences, affecting everything from pollination to
nutrient cycling. By investing in the protection of endangered species, we are, in fact,
investing in the health of our planet and the sustainability of life on Earth.
Moreover, many endangered species are indicators of the overall health of ecosystems.
Their decline often signifies underlying environmental issues, such as habitat destruction

and pollution, which can also harm human populations. Addressing the threats faced by


endangered species can thus lead to the improvement of environmental conditions that
benefit humans and wildlife alike. For example, initiatives to protect a particular habitat
may also result in cleaner air and water for nearby communities.
However, it is essential to ensure that funds allocated for endangered species protection are
used efficiently and effectively. Mismanagement or a lack of clear goals can lead to
wasteful spending. Conservation efforts should be based on scientific research and
prioritize actions that have a reasonable chance of success. Furthermore, partnerships
between governments, conservation organizations, and local communities can enhance the
impact of conservation initiatives.
In conclusion, I believe that investing more money in protecting endangered species is not
a waste of valuable resources. It is a crucial step in safeguarding biodiversity, maintaining
healthy ecosystems, and addressing environmental issues that affect both wildlife and
humans. However, it is essential to approach this investment with careful planning and a
focus on effective conservation strategies to maximize its benefits.

6. Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their
free time to help the local community. They believe this would benefit both the
individual teenager and society as a whole.
Do you agree or disagree?
Model answer (Band 7):
The idea of mandatory unpaid work for teenagers during their free time to benefit the local
community is a topic of debate. Some argue that it would be advantageous for both the
teenagers and society as a whole, while others contend that such a requirement could be
unfair or counterproductive. In my opinion, while encouraging voluntary community
involvement among teenagers is beneficial, making it mandatory may not be the most
effective approach.
To begin with, there are several compelling arguments in favor of encouraging teenagers

to engage in unpaid community work voluntarily. Such experiences can instill valuable life
skills and character traits, including teamwork, empathy, and a sense of civic responsibility.
Voluntary community service allows teenagers to connect with people from diverse
backgrounds and gain a better understanding of the challenges faced by their community.
It can also provide a sense of fulfillment and personal growth, which can be particularly
beneficial during adolescence, a period of self-discovery.
Moreover, voluntary community work can have positive social impacts. Teenagers who
actively contribute to their local communities may help bridge generational gaps and
strengthen social bonds. Their efforts can address community needs that may otherwise be
neglected, such as support for vulnerable populations or the upkeep of public spaces. In


this sense, teenagers' involvement in unpaid work can contribute to the betterment of
society as a whole.
However, making such involvement mandatory raises several concerns. Firstly, it may
infringe upon individual freedom and personal choice. Forcing teenagers to engage in
community work during their free time might lead to resentment and resistance, ultimately
diminishing the positive impact of their contributions. It is essential that teenagers develop
a genuine sense of altruism and a desire to give back to their communities, rather than
feeling coerced into doing so.
Secondly, the effectiveness of mandatory unpaid work in achieving its intended benefits is
questionable. True community engagement is best fostered through intrinsic motivation,
not through external mandates. Mandatory service can lead to mere compliance rather than
genuine enthusiasm for community involvement, which may undermine the quality and
effectiveness of the work performed.
In conclusion, while there are clear benefits to encouraging teenagers to engage in unpaid
work for their local communities, making it mandatory may not be the most effective
approach. Instead, fostering a culture of volunteerism and providing opportunities for
teenagers to explore their interests in community service voluntarily can lead to more
meaningful and lasting benefits for both the individuals and society as a whole.

7. Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees
dress, because what matters is the quality of their work.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own
knowledge or experience.
Model answer (Band 7):
The question of whether employers should prioritize the appearance of their employees or
focus solely on the quality of their work is a matter of ongoing discussion. In my view,
while the quality of work is undoubtedly paramount, employers should also consider the
way their employees dress to a reasonable extent, as it can have an impact on the overall
work environment and image of the organization.
Firstly, it is essential to acknowledge that the quality of work should be the primary concern
for employers. The skills, competence, and productivity of employees directly contribute
to the success of a business or organization. Employees should be evaluated primarily
based on their ability to perform their job duties effectively and efficiently. A talented and
proficient employee can bring immense value to an organization, irrespective of their attire.


However, the way employees dress can still hold significance in certain situations. For
example, in customer-facing roles, such as those in retail, hospitality, or client services,
employees often represent the public face of the company. In these cases, their appearance
can influence customer perceptions and satisfaction. Well-groomed and appropriately
dressed employees can create a positive impression and enhance the reputation of the
organization. On the other hand, employees who consistently disregard dress codes or
present themselves inappropriately may send a negative message to customers and clients,
potentially impacting business relationships.
Furthermore, the way employees dress can also affect the internal work environment. Dress
codes and workplace attire can convey a sense of professionalism and discipline. When
employees dress in a manner that aligns with company standards, it can foster a more

cohesive and unified workplace culture. It can also promote safety in certain industries by
ensuring that employees wear appropriate attire for their roles.
In conclusion, while the quality of work should be the foremost consideration for
employers, the way employees dress should not be entirely disregarded. The importance of
appearance varies depending on the nature of the job and its impact on customer
perceptions and the internal work environment. Striking a balance between focusing on
work quality and establishing reasonable dress codes can contribute to a more productive
and professional workplace.

8. In some countries, many children are becoming overweight and unhealthy. Some
people say it is the responsibility of governments to solve this problem.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Model essay (Band 8):
The growing prevalence of childhood obesity and associated health problems is a matter
of concern in many countries. The question of whether it is the responsibility of
governments to address this issue has sparked debate. In my opinion, while the government
does play a significant role in tackling childhood obesity, it is not solely responsible; a
collaborative effort involving various stakeholders is essential.
First and foremost, governments do have a crucial role to play in addressing childhood
obesity. They possess the authority to implement policies and regulations that can impact
the food industry, school systems, and public health initiatives. For instance, the
government can regulate the marketing and advertising of unhealthy foods to children,
impose taxes on sugary beverages, and enforce nutritional standards in schools. These
measures can help create an environment that promotes healthier food choices and physical
activity, thus contributing to the reduction of childhood obesity.


However, the responsibility should not fall solely on the government's shoulders. Parents
and caregivers play a fundamental role in shaping a child's eating habits and lifestyle.
Educating parents about nutrition, physical activity, and healthy cooking practices is

crucial. Furthermore, schools, where children spend a significant portion of their day,
should also contribute by providing nutritious meals, implementing physical education
programs, and promoting a healthy school environment.
The food industry, too, bears responsibility. Food manufacturers can reformulate products
to reduce sugar, salt, and unhealthy fats, and provide clearer nutritional information on
packaging. Additionally, healthcare professionals have a role in raising awareness about
childhood obesity, providing guidance on healthy lifestyles, and offering support to
families struggling with this issue.
Community organizations, media, and civil society also have a part to play in raising
awareness and advocating for policies that promote healthier living. Collective efforts that
involve government, families, schools, healthcare providers, and the food industry can
create a more comprehensive approach to combat childhood obesity effectively.
In conclusion, while governments do have a significant responsibility in addressing
childhood obesity, it is not solely their duty. It requires a multi-faceted approach involving
parents, schools, the food industry, healthcare professionals, and civil society to create a
supportive environment that fosters healthy lifestyles for children. By working together,
we can effectively tackle this pressing health issue and ensure a brighter, healthier future
for the younger generation.

9. The use of mobile phones is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain
places so mobile phones should be banned like smoking.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Model essay (Band 7):
The comparison between the use of mobile phones and smoking in terms of their impact
on social behavior has sparked a debate regarding whether mobile phone usage should be
similarly restricted in certain places. In my view, while there are some parallels in terms of
antisocial behavior, an outright ban on mobile phone usage like that imposed on smoking
is not the most practical solution.
Firstly, it is important to acknowledge that both mobile phone usage and smoking can lead
to antisocial behavior in certain contexts. For instance, individuals engrossed in their

mobile phones may become oblivious to their surroundings, ignoring social interactions
and disrupting the atmosphere in public spaces. Similarly, smokers can create discomfort
for those around them through secondhand smoke exposure and littering of cigarette butts.
In this sense, there is a shared aspect of antisocial behavior.


However, there are significant differences between the two behaviors. Smoking has wellestablished health risks not only to the smoker but also to those exposed to secondhand
smoke. This makes smoking bans in public places a justifiable public health measure. In
contrast, mobile phone usage, while potentially disruptive in social settings, does not pose
the same immediate health risks to others.
Moreover, the complete ban on mobile phone usage in public places would be challenging
to enforce and may infringe upon personal freedoms. Unlike smoking, which can be
physically restricted in designated areas, mobile phone usage is more subtle and harder to
monitor. Imposing a ban could lead to issues of privacy and individual autonomy.
A more balanced approach would be to promote responsible mobile phone usage through
public awareness campaigns and the establishment of guidelines for appropriate behavior
in certain settings. Many places already have rules in place, such as quiet zones in public
transport, which encourage considerate phone usage. Encouraging individuals to be
mindful of their surroundings and fellow citizens when using mobile phones is a more
feasible and respectful approach.
In conclusion, while mobile phone usage and smoking can both lead to antisocial behavior,
imposing a ban on mobile phones akin to smoking restrictions is not a practical solution.
Rather than an outright ban, promoting responsible mobile phone usage through education
and guidelines is a more reasonable approach to address the issue of antisocial behavior in
public spaces.

10. More and more people are becoming seriously overweight. Some people suggest
that the solution to this problem is to increase the price of fattening foods.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Model answer (Band 8):

The increasing prevalence of obesity is a global health concern that has garnered significant
attention. One proposed solution to combat this issue is to raise the prices of fattening
foods. In my opinion, while this approach may have its merits, it is not a comprehensive
solution to the complex problem of obesity.
To begin with, increasing the price of fattening foods can be an effective deterrent for some
individuals, particularly those who are price-sensitive and on a tight budget. When
unhealthy foods become more expensive, people may be inclined to purchase healthier
alternatives, thus reducing their overall calorie intake. This can lead to better dietary
choices and, in the long term, contribute to a reduction in obesity rates.
Moreover, the revenue generated from higher prices on fattening foods could be reinvested
in public health initiatives aimed at promoting healthier lifestyles. These initiatives may
include subsidizing the cost of fresh fruits and vegetables, improving access to exercise


facilities, and funding educational programs on nutrition and physical activity. Such
measures can have a positive impact on individuals' health behaviors and help address the
multifaceted nature of obesity.
However, it is essential to recognize the limitations of this approach. First, it may
disproportionately affect lower-income individuals and families who already struggle to
afford healthier food options. This could create social and economic disparities in access
to nutritious foods and exacerbate existing inequalities in health outcomes. Thus, careful
consideration and measures to mitigate the impact on vulnerable populations are necessary.
Second, increasing the price of fattening foods alone does not address the complex factors
contributing to obesity, such as sedentary lifestyles, lack of nutrition education, and the
influence of food marketing. A more holistic approach is required, which includes
comprehensive public health campaigns, improvements in urban planning to encourage
physical activity, and greater emphasis on nutrition education in schools and communities.
In conclusion, while increasing the price of fattening foods may have some merits in
deterring unhealthy eating habits, it should be part of a broader strategy to combat obesity.
Comprehensive efforts, including public health initiatives, education, and urban planning,

are necessary to address the multifaceted nature of this complex issue. Solving the obesity
problem requires a multi-pronged approach that takes into account the diverse factors
contributing to unhealthy lifestyles.

11. Some employers are giving increased importance to employing people with good
social skills in addition to good qualifications.
Do you agree or disagree that social skills are as important as good qualifications for
success in a job?
Model answer (Band 7):
The significance of social skills in the workplace has garnered increasing attention in recent
years. Some employers now prioritize hiring individuals with strong social skills, in
addition to good qualifications. In my opinion, I agree that social skills are as crucial as
qualifications for achieving success in a job.
Firstly, social skills play a pivotal role in fostering effective communication and
collaboration within a team or organization. In today's interconnected and diverse work
environments, the ability to communicate clearly, empathize with colleagues, and work
harmoniously with others is indispensable. An employee who possesses strong social skills
can facilitate productive interactions, resolve conflicts amicably, and contribute to a
positive workplace atmosphere. This not only enhances individual job performance but
also promotes a cohesive and efficient work environment.


Moreover, social skills are instrumental in building and maintaining professional
relationships. Networking is a fundamental aspect of career growth and success.
Individuals with strong social skills are often better equipped to establish meaningful
connections with colleagues, clients, and superiors. These connections can lead to
mentorship opportunities, career advancement, and access to valuable resources and
information. Consequently, social skills can be a catalyst for career progression and longterm success in the job market.
However, it is important to emphasize that social skills should complement, rather than
replace, good qualifications. Qualifications provide the foundational knowledge and

expertise required to excel in a specific job role. Social skills enhance one's ability to apply
that knowledge effectively, interact with others, and adapt to evolving workplace dynamics.
In conclusion, the contemporary job market places increased importance on social skills in
addition to qualifications. These skills are integral to effective communication, teamwork,
and relationship-building, all of which contribute to individual job performance and career
growth. While qualifications are essential, social skills can make the difference in
achieving success in a job by fostering collaboration and professional connections.
Therefore, I believe that social skills are indeed as important as good qualifications for
success in the modern workplace.

12. It is the responsibility of schools to teach children good behavior in addition to
providing formal education.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Model anwer (Band 7):
The debate over the role of schools in teaching good behavior alongside formal education
has been a longstanding one. While formal education undoubtedly plays a crucial role in
preparing students for academic and professional success, I strongly believe that schools
also bear a significant responsibility in instilling good behavior and character development
in students.
Firstly, schools serve as more than just academic institutions; they are essential
environments for personal growth and social development. Beyond imparting knowledge,
schools provide students with opportunities to interact with peers, teachers, and authority
figures. These interactions offer valuable lessons in social skills, empathy, and respect for
others. Schools can create a conducive environment for students to learn how to
communicate effectively, collaborate with others, and resolve conflicts peacefully. These
are essential life skills that go beyond the scope of formal education but are equally vital
for personal and professional success.


Furthermore, schools are influential in shaping the ethical and moral compass of students.

By incorporating values education and character development programs into their
curriculum, schools can help instill a sense of integrity, responsibility, and empathy in
students. These qualities are essential for building strong, ethical citizens who can
contribute positively to society.
However, it is crucial to strike a balance between formal education and character
development. Schools should not neglect their primary mission of providing academic
knowledge and skills. Rather, character education should be integrated into the overall
curriculum, creating a holistic approach to education that combines cognitive, social, and
emotional development.
In conclusion, I strongly agree that schools should take on the responsibility of teaching
good behavior in addition to providing formal education. Schools are not just academic
institutions but also essential environments for social and character development. A wellrounded education should encompass not only the acquisition of knowledge but also the
cultivation of good behavior and values, equipping students to thrive academically and
contribute positively to society.

13. Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for
communication has a negative effect on young people’s reading and writing skills.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Model answer (Band 8):
In today's rapidly evolving digital age, the use of computers and mobile phones for
communication has become ubiquitous, especially among young people. While some argue
that this increasing reliance on technology negatively impacts the reading and writing skills
of the youth, I partially agree with this assertion. While there are certain adverse effects,
there are also numerous positive aspects to consider.
To begin with, it is undeniable that the prevalence of digital communication tools has
changed the way young people read and write. One of the primary concerns is the impact
of shorthand texting and instant messaging on formal writing skills. Many adolescents have
developed a habit of using abbreviations and acronyms in their written communication,
which can hinder their ability to compose coherent and grammatically correct essays,
reports, or even emails. Moreover, the brevity and informality of digital messages often

promote a shallow understanding of complex subjects, as young people tend to skim
through information rather than engage in deep reading.
However, it is important to recognize that the use of computers and mobile phones can also
have a positive influence on reading and writing skills among young individuals. Firstly,
these devices provide easy access to a vast amount of information and literature online,


promoting reading in different forms. Young people can explore e-books, articles, and
blogs, expanding their knowledge base and improving their reading comprehension.
Additionally, the digital realm offers various platforms for creative writing, such as blogs
and social media, allowing young writers to express themselves and receive feedback from
a global audience. This not only enhances their writing skills but also encourages selfexpression.
Furthermore, technology-driven tools like grammar and spelling checkers, thesauri, and
online writing courses have become widely available, assisting young people in improving
their writing proficiency. These resources can help them correct errors and refine their
writing style. Consequently, technology contributes to a more interactive and self-directed
learning experience.
In conclusion, while the increased use of computers and mobile phones for communication
can have a detrimental effect on some aspects of young people's reading and writing skills,
it is essential to consider the broader picture. These technologies offer numerous
opportunities for enhancing literacy, access to information, and self-improvement. The key
lies in guiding young individuals to strike a balance between casual digital communication
and formal writing, thus harnessing the benefits of technology while minimizing its
negative impact. Ultimately, the responsibility lies with both educators and parents to help
young people navigate the digital world effectively and develop strong reading and writing
skills.

14. The advantages of the spread of English as a global language will continue to
outweigh its disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Model answer (Band 7):

The global prevalence of English as a dominant language has undeniably had a profound
impact on communication, commerce, and education worldwide. While there are clear
advantages to the widespread use of English as a global language, it is also important to
acknowledge its potential disadvantages. In this essay, I will argue that the advantages of
the spread of English as a global language do outweigh its disadvantages to a significant
extent.
First and foremost, one of the most notable benefits of English as a global language is the
facilitation of international communication. English serves as a lingua franca in many
fields, including business, science, and diplomacy. This linguistic common ground allows
people from different linguistic backgrounds to communicate effectively, fostering global
collaboration and understanding. As a result, English enables the free exchange of ideas
and information across borders, which is crucial in today's interconnected world.
Moreover, the widespread use of English provides individuals with enhanced access to a
wealth of knowledge and resources. A significant portion of the internet's content is


available in English, including academic research, educational materials, and online
courses. This accessibility to information empowers individuals to expand their horizons,
acquire new skills, and engage in self-improvement. It also contributes to bridging the
digital divide, as English speakers have a distinct advantage in accessing online resources.
Furthermore, English proficiency is often a valuable asset in the global job market. Many
multinational companies use English as their primary language for internal
communication, and job seekers with strong English skills have a competitive edge. This
can lead to better career opportunities, higher earning potential, and improved living
standards for individuals in non-English-speaking countries.
Nevertheless, it is crucial to acknowledge the disadvantages of the global spread of English.
One major concern is the potential erosion of linguistic diversity. As English becomes more
dominant, many indigenous languages face the risk of extinction or decline. This loss of
cultural and linguistic heritage is a significant drawback of the global prevalence of
English.

In addition, the pressure to learn and use English can create inequalities among individuals,
as those who cannot afford quality English education may be at a disadvantage. This can
perpetuate social and economic disparities in societies where English proficiency is highly
valued.
In conclusion, the advantages of the global spread of English as a global language are
substantial and far-reaching, including improved international communication, access to
knowledge, and job opportunities. However, it is important to address the potential
disadvantages, such as linguistic diversity loss and social inequalities. Overall, I believe
that the benefits of English as a global language outweigh its drawbacks to a significant
extent. Efforts should be made to preserve linguistic diversity and ensure equitable access
to English education to maximize the positive impact of this global phenomenon.

15. While many people go to university for academic study, more people should be
encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such
as electricians and plumbers.
Do you agree or disagree?
Model answer (Band 7):
The debate over whether more individuals should pursue vocational training rather than
traditional academic study at universities is a topic of considerable significance. In my
opinion, I agree that there is a need to encourage more people to opt for vocational training
due to the shortage of qualified workers in fields such as electricians and plumbers.
Firstly, there is a growing shortage of skilled workers in various vocational professions.
Electricians, plumbers, carpenters, and other skilled trades are essential for the functioning


of society. However, many countries are experiencing a deficiency of qualified individuals
in these fields. This shortage often leads to delays in construction projects, increased costs
for consumers, and potential safety hazards when unskilled workers attempt to fill the gap.
Encouraging more people to pursue vocational training can help address this pressing issue
and ensure that there are an adequate number of skilled workers available to meet the

demands of the job market.
Secondly, vocational training offers a practical and cost-effective path to employment.
University education can be expensive and time-consuming, leading many individuals to
graduate with substantial student debt and limited job prospects. In contrast, vocational
training programs are generally shorter in duration and often more affordable. Graduates
of vocational programs can enter the workforce sooner and start earning a living, which
can be especially advantageous for those who cannot afford the financial burden of a
university education.
Furthermore, vocational training equips individuals with practical skills that are directly
applicable to their chosen professions. This hands-on approach ensures that graduates are
job-ready and possess the necessary expertise to excel in their fields from day one.
Academic study at universities, while valuable for some careers, may not provide the same
level of practical training and immediate job readiness that vocational training offers.
However, it is important to emphasize that the promotion of vocational training should not
come at the expense of higher education. Universities play a crucial role in fostering critical
thinking, research, and innovation, which are essential for the advancement of society.
Therefore, the goal should be to strike a balance between encouraging vocational training
and preserving the value of academic study.
In conclusion, I agree that more people should be encouraged to pursue vocational training
due to the shortage of qualified workers in trades such as electricians and plumbers.
Vocational training not only addresses the immediate labor market needs but also offers a
practical and cost-effective pathway to employment. Nevertheless, it is essential to
maintain a balance between vocational training and academic study to ensure a wellrounded and skilled workforce that can contribute to the overall development of society.

16. The best way to teach children to cooperate is through team sports at school. To
what extent do you agree or disagree?
Model essay (band 8):
The topic of teaching children cooperation through team sports in school is a subject of
great importance, and it provokes both agreement and disagreement. While I acknowledge
the benefits of team sports in promoting cooperation among children, I believe that it is not

the sole or best method for instilling this crucial skill.


Firstly, it is undeniable that team sports offer valuable opportunities for children to learn
cooperation. When children participate in team sports like soccer or basketball, they must
work together with their teammates to achieve a common goal, whether it's winning a game
or mastering a particular skill. This requires effective communication, coordination, and
mutual understanding among team members. For instance, in a soccer match, players must
pass the ball to their teammates, strategize plays, and defend together, all of which
necessitate cooperation.
Moreover, team sports can impart essential life lessons. Children who engage in these
activities learn about the importance of teamwork, the value of each team member's
contribution, and the ability to accept both success and failure graciously. These
experiences can shape their character and prepare them for future social and professional
interactions where cooperation is essential.
However, it would be a mistake to rely solely on team sports as the primary method of
teaching cooperation. Cooperation is a multifaceted skill that can be nurtured in various
settings, not limited to sports. In the classroom, for instance, group projects and
collaborative learning activities can teach children how to work together, share ideas, and
resolve conflicts. Beyond school, community service projects, clubs, and extracurricular
activities offer additional opportunities for children to cooperate with their peers.
Furthermore, not all children are inclined toward or interested in team sports. Forcing every
child to participate in team sports may lead to frustration, disengagement, or a lack of
motivation to cooperate effectively. Some children may thrive better in individual sports,
arts, or academic pursuits where cooperation is still possible but within a different context.
In conclusion, while team sports at school certainly have their merits in teaching
cooperation and teamwork, they should not be viewed as the exclusive or best way to instill
this essential skill in children. A well-rounded approach that incorporates various learning
environments and activities, including both sports and non-sports contexts, is likely to be
more effective in nurturing cooperation skills in a diverse group of children.

17. Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty.
Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to poorer countries
rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Model essay (band 7):
The question of whether providing financial aid is an effective means of addressing poverty
in poorer countries is a complex and contentious issue. While financial assistance alone
may not completely eradicate poverty, it is a crucial component of aid efforts. In my view,
developed countries should continue to provide financial aid to poorer nations, but it should
be accompanied by other types of assistance to create a comprehensive approach to poverty
alleviation.


Firstly, it is important to acknowledge the limitations of financial aid in eradicating poverty.
Simply providing money to poorer countries without addressing the root causes of poverty
and promoting sustainable development can lead to dependency and inefficiency in
resource allocation. In some cases, aid funds have been misused or misappropriated,
resulting in minimal impact on poverty reduction.

However, it is essential to recognize that financial aid, when managed effectively, can make
a significant difference in the lives of impoverished populations. Aid can be directed
towards critical areas such as healthcare, education, infrastructure development, and food
security. For example, foreign aid can fund the construction of schools, the provision of
clean water, or the distribution of vaccines, all of which contribute to improving the living
conditions and well-being of the disadvantaged.
Moreover, financial aid can act as a catalyst for economic growth in recipient countries. It
can stimulate investment, create job opportunities, and foster entrepreneurship. When
combined with good governance, responsible economic policies, and capacity-building
initiatives, foreign aid can help break the cycle of poverty by empowering local
communities and governments to become self-sufficient.

However, it is also crucial to diversify the types of assistance provided. Rather than solely
relying on financial aid, developed countries should consider offering technical expertise,
knowledge transfer, and technology sharing. This approach can help poorer countries build
their capacity to address poverty independently in the long run.
In conclusion, I agree that financial aid alone is insufficient to solve poverty in poorer
countries. Still, it remains an essential tool in the broader toolkit of assistance. Developed
countries should continue to provide financial aid, but they should complement it with
other forms of support, such as knowledge transfer, technology sharing, and capacity
building, to create a more holistic approach to poverty alleviation. By combining these
efforts, we can work towards sustainable development and a reduction in poverty
worldwide.

18. Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who
want to study in universities. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Model answer (band 7):
The issue of whether governments should fully cover course fees for university students is
a matter of significant debate. While some argue that such funding is essential to promote
higher education and reduce financial burdens on students, I hold the opinion that students
should bear a portion of their educational expenses. In this essay, I will explain why I
disagree with the idea of governments paying full course fees for university students.


First and foremost, expecting governments to cover all course fees for university students
places an unsustainable financial burden on the state. Higher education is a substantial
expense, and allocating a large portion of the national budget to fund every student's
education would divert resources from other essential sectors such as healthcare,
infrastructure, and social welfare. It is crucial for governments to maintain a balanced
budget to ensure the overall well-being of the nation.
Furthermore, when students have a financial stake in their education, they are more likely
to value it and take their studies seriously. The prospect of paying for their own education

encourages students to make informed decisions about their choice of degree and work
diligently to succeed academically. In contrast, if education is entirely funded by the
government, some students may take it for granted, leading to lower motivation and
engagement in their studies.
Moreover, there are alternative ways to support students financially without covering all
course fees. Scholarships, grants, and low-interest student loans are effective means of
assisting students who cannot afford the full cost of their education. These programs ensure
that those with genuine financial need receive support while still encouraging students to
take personal responsibility for their educational expenses.
It can be argued that fully funded education would promote accessibility and equality in
higher education. However, it is essential to recognize that governments can achieve these
goals through targeted financial aid programs that assist students based on their
socioeconomic backgrounds. Full funding may not be the most efficient or sustainable way
to address these issues.
In conclusion, I do not agree with the notion that governments should pay full course fees
for university students. Such an approach places an excessive financial burden on the state,
diminishes the value of education, and may not be the most effective means of promoting
accessibility and equality in higher education. Instead, governments should focus on
implementing targeted financial aid programs and scholarships to ensure that higher
education remains accessible to all while encouraging students to take responsibility for
their educational expenses.

19. Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the
minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes. To what extent do you agree
or disagree?
Model answer (Band 7):
Road safety is a pressing concern in society today, with traffic accidents claiming numerous
lives each year. One proposed solution is to raise the minimum legal driving age for both
cars and motorcycles. While some argue that this would significantly improve road safety,

I firmly agree that increasing the minimum legal driving age can indeed contribute to a
safer road environment.
One compelling reason to support raising the minimum legal driving age is the issue of
inexperience and immaturity among young drivers. Teenagers, who often obtain driving
licenses at a relatively young age, may not possess the necessary judgment and maturity to
make responsible decisions while driving. Research has shown that the brains of
adolescents are still developing, particularly in areas related to impulse control and risk
assessment. Therefore, by delaying the age at which individuals can drive, we can
potentially reduce the number of accidents caused by impulsive and inexperienced young
drivers.
Another critical aspect to consider is the correlation between age and accident statistics.
Numerous studies have demonstrated that the majority of traffic accidents involve drivers
in the 18 to 25 age group. By increasing the minimum legal driving age, we can reduce the
number of drivers in this high-risk age bracket. This change would likely lead to a decrease
in the overall number of accidents, injuries, and fatalities on our roads, thus contributing
significantly to road safety.
Furthermore, raising the minimum legal driving age could allow for improved training and
awareness programs for young drivers. With more time to prepare before obtaining a
license, potential drivers can undergo comprehensive driver's education courses that
emphasize the importance of safe driving practices, defensive driving techniques, and
adherence to traffic regulations. This extended period of training and awareness can lead
to more responsible and cautious drivers when they do eventually obtain their licenses.
It is argued that raising the minimum driving age may inconvenience young individuals
who rely on personal transportation for education, employment, or other essential
activities. However, it is crucial to balance these concerns with the greater goal of road
safety. Alternative transportation options, such as public transit or carpooling, can help
mitigate any inconveniences while ensuring the safety of all road users.
In conclusion, increasing the minimum legal driving age for cars and motorcycles is a
promising strategy to enhance road safety. This policy change would address the issues of

inexperience and immaturity among young drivers, reduce accident statistics within the
high-risk age group, and facilitate improved training and awareness programs. While it
may pose certain challenges, the potential benefits in terms of road safety far outweigh the
inconveniences. Therefore, I strongly agree that raising the minimum legal driving age is
a crucial step toward making our roads safer for everyone.


20. Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who
want to study in universities. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Modal answer (band 7):
The question of whether governments should fully cover course fees for university students
is a contentious issue. While some argue that this would promote higher education
accessibility and alleviate financial burdens on students, I fundamentally disagree with this
statement. I believe that students should contribute to their educational expenses, and
government resources can be more effectively used in other areas.
Firstly, advocating for full government coverage of course fees ignores the financial
implications for the state. Higher education is a substantial financial commitment, and
allocating a significant portion of the national budget to fund every student's university
education may lead to an imbalance in resource allocation. Governments must maintain a
balanced budget to ensure the overall well-being of the nation, including healthcare,
infrastructure development, and social welfare programs. Instead of bearing the entire cost,
it is more reasonable for students to share the financial responsibility.
Furthermore, when students are required to contribute to their education, they tend to value
it more and take their studies seriously. The prospect of paying for one's education
encourages students to make informed decisions about their choice of degree, set academic
goals, and work diligently to succeed. In contrast, if education is entirely funded by the
government, some students may take it for granted, leading to lower motivation and
engagement in their studies. Personal investment in education fosters a sense of ownership
and responsibility, which can lead to better academic outcomes.
Moreover, there are alternative ways to support students financially without covering all

course fees. Scholarships, grants, and low-interest student loans are effective means of
assisting students who cannot afford the full cost of their education. These programs ensure
that individuals with genuine financial need receive support while still encouraging
students to take personal responsibility for their educational expenses. Targeted financial
aid programs can be designed to address specific socioeconomic barriers to education,
making it accessible to those who need it most.
In conclusion, I firmly disagree with the notion that governments should pay full course
fees for university students. Such an approach places an excessive financial burden on the
state and may divert resources from other critical sectors. Encouraging students to share in
the financial responsibility of their education promotes a sense of ownership and
accountability, ultimately leading to more motivated and engaged learners. By
implementing targeted financial aid programs and scholarships, governments can ensure
that higher education remains accessible while preserving fiscal responsibility.


Part 2: Discussion essay
21. Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale
while other believe it is better to deal with them nationally.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Model answer (Band 7):
The approach to solving environmental problems is a subject of debate, with some
advocating for global solutions and others favoring national approaches.
On one hand, proponents of global solutions argue that environmental issues, such as
climate change and pollution, transcend national boundaries. These problems have farreaching consequences that affect the entire planet. For instance, greenhouse gas emissions
from one country contribute to global climate change. Therefore, addressing these issues
globally through international agreements and cooperation is seen as the most effective
approach.
On the other hand, those in favor of national approaches believe that each country has
unique environmental challenges. Tailoring solutions to fit the specific needs and
circumstances of individual nations is crucial. Moreover, countries should have the

autonomy to make decisions that align with their economic and developmental goals. For
instance, a developing nation may need to prioritize economic growth, and imposing
stringent global environmental regulations may hinder progress.
In my opinion, a balanced approach that combines elements of both global and national
efforts is the most practical way forward. Some environmental issues require global
cooperation due to their transboundary nature. International agreements and collective
efforts are essential to mitigate these challenges. However, nations should also address
environmental problems specific to their circumstances. A tailored national approach
allows for the consideration of local factors and ensures that policies do not hinder a
nation's development.
In conclusion, the debate over the scale at which environmental problems should be solved
is complex. Striking a balance between global cooperation and national autonomy is
essential for effectively addressing these challenges. Collaboration at both levels is key to
creating a sustainable and environmentally friendly future for our planet.