Danger / 153
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
implement policies to address the situation. The natural
incentives in the privatesector would tend to accelerate,
ratherthanresolve,thecrisis.
There is an ongoing trend toward concentration of
incomethatisdrivenlargelybythecontinuingadvanceof
automation technology and globalization, and also by a
lackofprogressivetaxpolicies.Manypeoplemightargue
thatincreasingincomeinequalityiscausedprimarilybya
“skillpremium.”Inotherwords,inthemodern,technolo-
gicaleconomy,peoplewhoarehighlyeducatedandskilled
haveasignificantadvantageinthelaborforce.Whilethis
hasbeentruesofar,itislargelybecauserelativelylowskill
jobshavebeenthefirsttobeautomatedandalsothefirstto
besubjectedtothefullforceofglobalization.Aswesaw
in Chapter 2, advancing automation technology will in-
creasingly threaten highly paid knowledge workers with
collegeeducations.Thesejobswillalso,ofcourse,besub-
jecttooffshoring.Clearevidenceofthesetrendsisalready
apparentininformationtechnology(IT)jobs,andwecan
expectthistobecomemuchmorebroad-basedinthefu-
ture.Wecanexpect that income will becomeevenmore
concentratedinthehandsofthosewhoarepositionedto
benefitdirectlyfromtheincreasingvalueoftechnological
capitalrelativetolabor.
Extremeincomeinequalityisgenerallypresentedasa
socialproblemoranissueofbasicfairness.Whileitmay
be these things, it isalso—more critically—a mathematical
problem in terms of the viability of the mass market.
Whenpurchasingpoweristakenfromthousandsofaver-
ageconsumersandconcentratedinthehandsofoneweal-
THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 154
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
thy individual, that purchasing power is effectively steri-
lized:itno longerplaysavibrantroleingeneratingmass
market demand for products and services. As we have
seen, this will ultimatelycause the market “river” to run
dry.
WeoftenhearthatincomeintheUnitedStatesisto-
day moreconcentrated than atany time sincethe 1920s.
The reality is that the risks from this concentration are
probablyevenhigher today becausethe rise ofthemass
market has changed the nature of our economy. Today,
virtually everyone in industrialized society—including es-
pecially the most wealthy individuals—derives his or her
incomedirectlyorindirectlyfromthemassmarket.
The social impact resulting from the permanent eli-
mination of a large fraction of the jobs held by average
people would obviously be dramatic. History showsthat
onceunemploymentreachesacertainlevel,theveryfoun-
dationsofdemocraticsocietymaybethreatened.During
theGreatDepression,unemploymentreached25percent
in the United States. Joseph P. Kennedy, thefounderof
the Kennedy dynasty, famously said that during this pe-
riod,hewouldhavegladlygivenuphalfofeverythinghe
had, if he couldhave been certain of retaining theother
halfofhisfortuneundertheruleoflaw.Clearly,therisks
are very real, not just for the bulk of people whose in-
comesmaybethreatened,butalsoforthosewealthyindi-
vidualswhomaybelikelytoresisttheideaofgovernment
policiesthatincludemoreprogressivetaxation.
Mypurposeinwritingthisbookistotrytogivethese
issues morevisibilityin thehope that aconstructivedis-
Danger / 155
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
cussionanddebatecanoccur.Perhapstheargumentsthat
I have presented here will turn out to be wrong. But if
theyareevenpartiallycorrect,thenwecannotaffordtobe
takenbysurprise;itwillbeessentialtohaveaplan.
Inthenextchapter,wewillfastforwardtoapointin
thefuturewherethetrendtowardwidespreadjobautoma-
tionhasbecomeclear.Oncethishappens,therewillreally
benochoiceexcepttocomeupwithsomemodifications
to our system so that the free market can continue to
functionandthrive.
CopyrightedMaterial–
Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
Chapter 4
TRANSITION
Inthepreviouschaptersofthis book,wehaveseenthat
machineautomationislikelytosomedayeliminateasub-
stantialfractionofthejobsnowperformedbypeople.Au-
tomationispoisedtoadvanceontwobroadfronts.First,
machinesandrobotswillincreasinglytakeovertheroutine
jobsinfactories,retailstores,officesandwarehousesthat
arenowheldbyworkers.
Second,theexistingtrendtowardtechnology-enabled
self-servicewillaccelerate.Wealreadyseethistrendwith
ATMs, automated checkout aisles, online banking, and
automated telephone answering systems. All of these
representareaswheremachinesallowconsumerstoinde-
pendently perform tasks that once required the involve-
mentofhumanworkers.Inthefuture,wecanexpectthat
thistrendwillbeextendedtoincludecellphonesandoth-
ermobiledevicessothatconsumerswillbeableperform
tasksandgetautomatedassistancealmostanywhere.
Inaddition,thedrivetowardself-servicewillalsooc-
cur within businesses. New automation tools will enable
managersinbothlargecorporationsandsmallbusinesses
Transition / 157
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
todirectlydothejobsandperformtheanalysisthatonce
requiredhumanemployees.
Aswesawinthelastchapter,ifthesetrendsbecome
unambiguousandareallowedtoimpactinanuncontrolled
manner,theresultislikelytobeasevereeconomicdown-
turnasworkers(whoarealsoconsumers)begintofearfor
their long-term employment prospects. In Chapter 3, I
proposedsomeinitiativeswhichmighthelptostabilizethe
situationanddelaytheonsetofthisscenario;however,we
cannotescapethefactthattechnologicaladvanceisrelent-
lessandthatfreemarketincentiveswillcontinuetopush
theprivatesectortowardtheeliminationofjobs.Oncewe
accept the fact that a large fractionofjobswill beauto-
matedinthefuture,thenwereallyhavenochoicebutto
alsoaccepttherealitythatoureconomicsystem,asitex-
iststoday,cannotcontinuetofunctionindefinitelywithout
modification.
Inthischapter,wearegoingtofastforwardfarinto
thefuture;wewillimagineatimewhenatleastthreequar-
tersofthejobswhichexistinourcurrenteconomyhave
been permanently automated away. In other words, the
unemploymentratewillbeatleast75percent—analmost
unimaginably high level—and there will be no realistic
hope that more jobs will be created in the future. Is it
possibletohaveaprosperouseconomyandacivilsociety
insuchascenario?
Ifwecandeviseasystemthatwouldworkinsuchan
admittedlyextremesituation,thenweshouldalsobeable
to figure out a way to gradually transition into that new
system,sothatwecanmaintaineconomicstabilityasau-
THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 158
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
tomationadvancesinthecomingyearsanddecades.To-
wardthatend,let’sbeginbylookingatthebasicelements
ofourexistingfreemarketeconomy.
The Basis of the Free Market Economy:
Incentives
Thefreemarketeconomyisanaturalsystemthatpushes
consumers, businesses, investors and workers to act in
waysthatultimatelypropelsocietyasawholetowardad-
vancementandgreaterprosperity.Inotherwords,aseach
ofuspursuesourownself-interest,collectivelywe move
everyoneforward.Throughthelogicofthemarket,these
collective actions automatically allocate resources in the
mostefficientwaysothateconomicoutputismaximized.
This, ofcourse,is the“invisible hand” that Adam Smith
spokeof.
Wecandividethelogicofthefreemarketintothree
broadsetsofincentives:
1. Individual consumers act to find the best values for
products and services. In other words, consumers
shop around. No one wants to overpay, and no one
wantstoendupwithaninferiorproduct.
2. Theownersofbusinessesandcapitalcompetetomax-
imize profits by providing the best possible value to
consumers. As they do so, they invest in ways that
driveinnovationandcreatenewproducts,servicesand
industries.
3. Individualworkersacttomaximizetheirincome.They
seek the best possible job, invest in education and
Transition / 159
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
trainingtoenhancetheir futurecareerprospects,and
dotheircurrentjobtothebestoftheirability.
Historically, these three incentives have worked in
concerttodrivesocietytowardeverincreasingprosperity.
Aswehaveseen,the problemwefaceifautomationeli-
minatesalargefractionofthejobsheldbyworkersisthat
consumers and workers are the same individuals. Without
reliableincomefromemployment,therewillnolongerbe
a critical mass of viable consumers. And it is consumers
whoultimatelydrivethemassmarketeconomy.Without
the expectation of sufficient market demand, no rational
businessowner willinvest in increased production orin-
novation.
Preserving the Market
Clearly,inordertopreservethemassmarketinalargely
automatedeconomy,weneedtoprovideanalternativeto
jobs.Weneedamechanismthatcangetareliableincome
streamintothehandsofconsumers.Thisofcourse,isa
propositionthatwillbeverydifficultformostofustoac-
cept;theideathatwemustworkforalivingisoneofour
most basic core values. The current alternatives to job-
basedincome,suchasunemploymentinsuranceorwelfare
payments,comewithhighlynegativeconnotationsandare
purposelydesignedto provideminimalsupport so that a
disincentivetoworkisnotestablished.
Our current value system celebrates the importance
of our labor. We believe that work is essential and that
consumption is a privilege that derives from that work.
However, this is a belief system that is fundamentally
THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 160
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
based on the historical reality that human labor is indis-
pensabletotheproductionprocess.Whathappenswhen
technologyreachesthepointwheremosthumanlaboris
nolongeressential?
At that point, we will have to undergo a quantum
shift in our value system. In order to preserve the free
marketsystem,wewillhavetocometotherealizationthat
while work (at least for most people) may no longer be
essential,broad-basedconsumptionis
essential.Inthedeveloped
world, our mass market economy has grown farbeyond
what isrequired to simplyprovideindividuals withbasic
necessities.Inordertomaintaintheglobaleconomy and
driveittowardfuturegrowth,wemust havea verylarge
numberofconsumerswithadequatepurchasingpower—
allofwhomhaveconfidenceintheirfuturecontinuityof
income. Without that critical mass of viable consumers,
economicdeclineismathematicallyinescapable.
There is really no way to envision how the private
sectorcansolvethisproblem.Thereissimplynorealal-
ternativeexceptforthegovernmenttoprovidesometype
ofincomemechanismforconsumers.Whilethisideawill
initially,ofcourse,bevehementlyopposed,Ibelievethat
intime,thiswillhavetobeacceptedasabasicfunctionof
government.
Considertheviewpointofaneconomicallyconserva-
tiveorlibertarianthinker.Thispersonislikelytoadvocate
thesmallestpossiblegovernmentandamarket thatisas
free and unregulated as possible. Nonetheless, this per-
son—if he or she is reasonable—is veryunlikelyto pro-
pose eliminating government entirely because he or she
Transition / 161
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
understandsthatthereisonecorefunctionofgovernment
whichis critical totheoperation of thefree market:the
protectionofpropertyrights.Thegovernmentmustmain-
tainanationaldefense,apoliceforceandajudicialsystem,
and it must enforce and protect clearlydefined rightsto
own and trade property. Without these governmental
functions, the free market could not operate effectively
andcivilsocietywoulderodeintojunglewarfare.
Inafuture,largelyautomatedeconomy,thepreserva-
tion of robust market demand by providing an income
streamtoindividualconsumerswillalsohavetobecomea
corefunctionofgovernment.Thisisanideathatwillno
doubt initially elicit derisionor outrage. In the long run,
however,Ibelievethattherewillsimplybenoalternative.
Market demand powers our economy. No rational
businessownerwillinvestinincreased productionin the
absence of an expectation of demand. In the economic
environment of 2009, consumerism is very much out of
fashion,andthisisreallynotagoodthing.Themediais
repletewithstories abouthow Americanshavegoneout
andspenttoomuchonbigscreenTVs.Thesestoriesmiss
thepoint.Whiletherewillalwaysbesomeindividualswho
act irresponsibly, the overall problem is really not that
Americanshavespenttoomuch.Theproblemisthattheir
spendinghasbeensustainedbyborrowingratherthanby
growthinrealincome.Andthisisbecause,formostaver-
agepeople,therehasbeenlittleornogrowthinincome,
while at the same time, health care costs have been ex-
ploding.
THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 162
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
Inthelongrun,onlysustainedconsumerspendingcan
turn the economy around and return us to economic
growth.Everythingproducedbyoureconomyisultimate-
lyconsumed by individual people; we cannot have long-
termprosperityunlessenormousnumbersofpeoplehave
sufficient income—and sufficient confidence in the fu-
ture—topowersustainedconsumption.
Again,conservativeeconomicthinkersmayreflexive-
lyobjecttothisview.Conservativestendtoemphasizethe
importance of production (or the “supply side”) in the
natural cycle that occurs between production and con-
sumption. Conservatives generally favor low taxes and
minimumregulationofproducersintheexpectationthat
thiswillresultinincreasedeconomicactivityandjobcrea-
tion, which will then lead to strong consumer demand.
Theproblemwiththatwayofthinking,ofcourse,isthat,
in an increasingly automated economy, the job creation
willnot occur. Consumers will have littleopportunity to
participateintheproductionprocessasworkersand will
loseaccesstothewagesthatsustainthem.Intheabsence
ofanalternateincomemechanism,acollapseinconsumer
spendingmustbetheinevitableresult.
Recapturing Wages
Aswebegin toenvisionhowitmightbepossibletode-
signanalternativeincomestreamforconsumers,let’sbe-
ginbyconsideringhowthewagesfromajobthathasbeen
automatedawaycouldberecapturedbythe government.
Whenabusinesseliminatesajobastheresultofautoma-
tion technology, the income that was previously paid to
Transition / 163
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
that worker does not simply vaporize. In fact, it is redi-
rectedintwoways:(1)Someoftheincomeaccruestothe
ownersandmanagersofthebusiness,and(2)someofthe
income is redirected to the consumers of the business’s
productsorservicesintheformoflowerprices.
Therefore, the government can recapture the wages
from the automated job with some combination of two
types of taxes. First, higher business taxes, capital gains
taxesandmoreprogressiveincometaxesonwealthyindi-
vidualscanbeusedtorecapture the incomethatgoesto
thebusiness’sowners.Thegrossmargin taxproposedin
the previouschapter or a carbontax might also provide
effectivemechanismsforrecapturingsomeofthisincome.
Secondly,someformofconsumptiontaxcouldbeusedto
recapture that portion of the lost wages that results in
lowerprices.Thisconsumptiontaxmightbeasimplesales
tax
*
oravalueaddedtax(VAT)similartotheonesalready
popularinEurope.
Once again, these ideas will probably be met with
strongresistance.Wealthyindividualsandbusinessowners
willinitiallybeveryunhappy.However,abusinessmanag-
er in the future will ultimately have to face two alterna-
tives:(1)Anewformoftaxationdesignedtoredirectin-
cometoconsumers,or(2)catastrophicallyfallingdemand.
Thisisreallynotadifficultchoice.Inanautomatedecon-
omy, low tax rates and robust demand are going to be
fundamentally incompatible. In the absence of the jobs
*
Ifasalestaxisuseditshouldcertainlybeaninternaltaxthatisin-
corporatedintothetotalprice(similartogasolinetaxes)ratherthanan
externaltaxthatistackedontothetotal(likestatesalestaxes).
THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 164
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
thatcurrentlypowerconsumers,somenewformoftaxa-
tion will be essential for creating an income mechanism
thatleadstosustaineddemandforproductsandservices.
ItisveryimportanttonotethatIamnotadvocating
taxessohighthatall value from technological progress is
recaptured. As technology advances, it provides benefits
farbeyond simplyeliminating jobs. Innovationresults in
new products and services and creates entirely new and
very lucrative markets.Considerthe caseofafullyauto-
mated factory. Astechnology progresses, thefactorywill
continue to become even more efficient and produce
products at lower prices, even though all the jobs have
already been eliminated. The taxes I have proposed are
intendedonlytorecapturethe wages from jobs that have
beenautomatedaway.Inotherwords,thehighertaxeswill
simplyreplacethewagesthatwouldhavebeenpaidinthe
absence of automation. Beyond this, the owners of the
businesswillcontinuetobenefitfromtheirinvestmentsin
improvedtechnology.Toseethis,considerthetablethat
follows.
Transition / 165
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
UnitCostBreakdownforaHypotheticalProductorService
Current
Cost
FutureCost
(nowage
recapture)
FutureCost
(withwage
recapture)
Cost of non-
executive wages
$40 $10 $10
Conventional
Taxes
$15 $15 $15
Special new taxes
to recapture wage
income
$0 $0 $30
Other Costs
$45 $35 $35
Total Unit Cost
$100
$60
$90
Thetableaboveoffersahypotheticalandadmittedly
simplisticexampleofaproductorservicethathasacur-
rent unitcost of$100.
*
Thetableshows that $40ofthis
currently represents wages paid to non-executive em-
ployees.Overtime,asautomationprogresses,theportion
of the unit cost allocated to wages falls to $10. Notice,
however, that the “other costs” category also falls. This
represents the cost benefits of advancing technology,
whicharedistinctfromtheeliminationofwages.Thegoal
shouldbetoimposeataxthatrecapturesthelostwages,
without also capturing the additional non-wage related
benefits of innovation. In this example, we have recap-
turedallofthelostwages.Inreality,wemightwanttoim-
*
Forsimplicity,Ihaveexpressedthisideaintermsofper-unitcost.In
practice, it would be better to base the wage recapture scheme on
wagesasapercentageoftotalrevenueforthebusiness.
THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 166
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
poseasomewhatlowertaxonbusinessesandthenusean
additionalconsumptiontaxtocapturetheremainingwage
income.Thisstrategywillensurethatthebusinesscontin-
uestoseeameaningfulincentivetoinnovate.
One approach to this problem might be to develop
historicalwageguidelinesforeachtypeofbusinessbased
on industry, business size, etc. As automation increases,
thewagerecapturetaxeswouldbegraduallyraisedsothat
thetotalofwagespaidandwagerecapturetaxesremained
relatively constant as a percentage of revenue over time.
The government would keep the revenues raised from
thesespecialtaxescompletelyseparatefromtherevenues
itusesforitsnormaloperations.Therevenuefromthese
taxes would then be used exclusively to replace income
fromlostwages.
Itwouldalsobepossibletodesignawagerecapture
schemewhichde-emphasizesdirecttaxesonbusinessand
reliesmoreonaconsumptiontax.Theproblemswiththis
arethatthetaxwouldneedtobeveryhighandwouldbe
regressive (it would fall most heavily on those with low
incomes). However, this could be addressed partly by
charging a lower tax rateon necessities and a higher tax
rate on luxury goods. It should also be combined with
moreprogressiveincometaxationonindividuals.Astrate-
gyrelyingmoreonaconsumptiontaxwouldhavethead-
vantageofnot making domestic producers less competi-
tive with their international counterparts. Any significant
consumption tax would have to be imposed equally on
Internetsalesandwouldrequirethecreationofamechan-
ism for insuring that taxes were paid on items being
Transition / 167
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
shippedfromoverseas(otherwisesaleswouldsimplygra-
vitatetooffshoremerchants).Theconsumptiontaxwould
also either have to apply to services as well as tangible
products,orserviceproviderswouldneedtobesubjectto
adirectwagerecapturetax.
*
TheideasIampresentinghere,ofcourse,represent
onlyabasicframework.Thedetailsandthetradeoffsbe-
tweenvarioustypesandlevelsoftaxationwouldneedto
be worked out using extensive analysis and probably
throughcomputersimulationoftheeconomy.Obviously,
anyrealworldtaxesthatweimplementinordertorecap-
turetheincomefromautomatedjobswillendupdoingso
inanimperfectway.Wealsoknowthatgovernmenttends
to be inefficient and wasteful. However, that does not
changetherealityofthesituation.Sincegovernmentisthe
onlyentitythatcanimpose overallregulationandcollect
taxes,thereisnorealisticalternativetosomeformofgov-
ernmentinvolvement.
Oneessentialprincipleofanysuchschemetore-
capturewageincomeisthattherevenues raisedmust be
kept separate. An absolute firewall should be established
between this special function of government and the
fundsusedforgeneralgovernmentoperation.Thisshould
bemadeeasierbythefactthatthefundswouldbeimme-
diatelydistributed to consumers; there would not be any
long-term fund that could be raided and used for other
*
It might also be necessary tohave different tax rates for different
products or services based on labor content. For a service that re-
mainedlaborintensive,theratecouldbelowersincewageswereal-
readybeingpaid.Forahighlyautomatedservicethetaxratewouldbe
higher.
THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 168
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
purposes.Asecondimportantpointwecanmakeisthat,
eventually,this specialandseparategovernmentfunction
wouldsubsumemanyoftheactivitiesnowprovidedforby
other government programs. Welfare, unemployment in-
surance and even social security could ultimately be re-
placed by this new, separately managed,income scheme.
Thatwouldleaveafarsmallergovernmentcore.
Positive Aspects of Jobs
Whileitis conceptuallynot difficult toenvisionhowthe
government might recapture lost wages through special
taxes,itismuchhardertodesignaneffectivewaytodirect
thatincometoconsumersintheabsenceofjobs.Infact,
the incentives attached to jobs provide many benefits
beyond income, both to individuals and to society as a
whole:
Jobs provide a useful occupation for our time.
Theyprovideindividualswithasenseofpurpose,
andtheyresultinamoreorderlyandcivilsociety.
Jobs provide hope for advancement. Even those
workers in the lowest paid professions can hope
thattheywillsomedaybeaffordedabetteroppor-
tunity.Thepresenceofthishopeforthefutureis
animportantcomponentofstability—bothforan
individual’semotionalstateandforsocietyingen-
eral.Beliefinthepossibilityofabetterfutureisal-
soasignificantdriverofcurrentconsumption.
Jobsmotivatepeopletoinvestineducation,train-
ingandotherformsofselfimprovement.Anindi-
vidual’sprimaryincentive forsuchan investment
Transition / 169
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
maybethepromiseofabettercareer,butboththe
individualandsocietyasawholederivemanyan-
cillarybenefits.
Clearly,ifweareto comeupwithanalternativein-
come mechanism, it is essential that these incentives
somehow be preserved.Thelack of these incentivesis a
primaryproblemwithcurrentwelfareprograms.Welfare,
asitiscurrentlyimplemented,providesfewincentivesfor
selfimprovementandlittlehopeforthefuture.Ittendsto
resultinapermanentunderclass,anditcertainlydoesnot
createthetypeofviableconsumersthatweneedtopower
theeconomyofthefuture.
The Power of Inequality
Theideaofincentivesiscloselytiedtotheconceptofin-
comeinequality.Inthisbook,Ihavemadethepointthat
extremeincomeconcentrationandinequalitywillultimate-
lyunderminetheviabilityofthemassmarket.However,it
isimportanttonotethattheotherextremealso presents
very serious problems. A program in which everyone is
provided with a relatively equal income—in return for
doingnothing—providesnomotivationforselfimprove-
ment,nosenseofself-worthandnohopeforabetterfu-
ture.Thisistheproblemwithexistingwelfareprograms.
Whatweneedthenisamechanismthatprovidesfor
unequal(butnotunfair)incomes.Weneedtosynthetically
recreatetherewardsandincentivesthatarecurrentlytied
tojobs.Theidealistoprovideunequalincomebutequal
opportunity, so that every individual can have a realistic
expectationofadvancinghisorherposition.Mostimpor-
THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 170
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
tantly,weneedtoensurethattheincentivesbuiltintothe
system motivateindividualsto dowhatis bestforthem-
selvesandforsocietyasawhole.
Where the Free Market Fails: Externalities
Whilethereislittlequestionthatthefreemarketoffersthe
bestoverallefficiencyofanyknowneconomicsystem,itis
nonetheless an imperfect system. Perhaps the biggest
shortcomingofthefreemarketeconomyisintheareaof
externalities.Anexternalityisacost(orbenefit)whichfalls
onsocietyasawhole,butwhichisnotincorporatedinto
theindividualincentivesfacedbybusinessesandindividu-
als.
Aclassicexampleofanexternalityisindustrialpollu-
tion. Intheabsence ofgovernment regulation, it costs a
factorynothingtosimplydumptoxicwasteintotheenvi-
ronment.Infact,thenaturaloperationofthefreemarket
would drive even environmentally conscious business
managerstopollutebecause,iftheydecidedtounilaterally
bear the extra costs of handling waste properly, they
wouldfindthemselvesatacompetitivedisadvantage.For
this reason, governments enforce regulations regarding
toxicwasteandpollution.
Themostsignificantexternalitythatsocietywillhave
todealwithinthecomingdecades is, ofcourse,climate
changebroughtonbyuncontrolledcarbonemissions.In
thenearfuture,wecanhopethatregulationsortaxeswill
increasinglybeimplementedtohelpaddressthisissue.
Ingeneral,governmentshavereasonablesuccessen-
forcing laws that help minimize negative externalities at
Transition / 171
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
theindustrylevel,butitismuchhardertoeffectivelyad-
dressexternalitiesattheindividualconsumerlevel.Thisis
a huge problembecausethe day-to-daychoices madeby
billionsofpeoplethroughouttheworldobviouslyhavean
enormouscollectiveimpactontheenvironment.
Becauseyoucareabouttheenvironment,youmaybe
drawntotheideaofreplacingyourolder,fuelinefficient
carwitha newerhybridmodel.Whilethis maysaveyou
somemoneyongasoline,youwillquicklyrealizethatonce
youfactorinothercosts,suchasdepreciation,thetransac-
tionprobably does not make sense on a purely financial
basis. Infact, individual incentives for acting in environ-
mentally conscious ways are typically quite weak. While
publiceducationdoessucceedinmotivatingmanypeople
tomaketherightchoicesintermsofthecarstheydrive,
oradecisiontousepublictransit,orparticipationinrecy-
clingprograms,thereislittledoubtthatfarbetterresults
couldbeobtainediftheincentivesweresomehowstrong-
er.
Your income depends on your job, and so you are
sure to wake up in the morning and arrive at work on
time. That is a powerful incentive. What if your income
alsodependedtosomeextentonyourbehaviors relative
totheenvironment?Clearly,thatwouldcauseadramatic
readjustment in the priority that we all give to acting in
environmentallyresponsibleways.
While designing a systemthat replaces theideaofa
traditionaljobwithsomeothermechanismfordelivering
income to consumersis aseriouschallenge, wecannow
seethatitalsopresentsanenormousopportunity.Clearly,
THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 172
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
wewillwanttoincorporateincentivesthatdirectlyaddress
environmentalissues(andotherexternalities)intoournew
incomemechanism.
*
Creating a Virtual Job
Atthemostbasiclevel,ajobisessentiallyasetofincen-
tives.Asapersonactsaccordingtothoseincentives,heor
she performs work that is currently required in order to
produceproductsandservices.Intheeconomyofthefu-
ture, if that work is no longer required, we will need to
create“virtual”jobs.Inotherwords,peoplewillcontinue
to earn income by acting in accordance with incentives,
buttheiractionswillnotnecessarilyresultin“work”inthe
traditionalsense.
The income earned by individuals must be unequal
and dependent on each individual’ssuccess inacting ac-
cordingtotheestablishedincentives.Thiswillensurethat
people are motivated to act in ways that benefit them-
selvesaswellassocietyasawhole.Mostimportantly,this
systemwillgetareliablestreamofincomeintothehands
ofconsumers,andaswehaveseen,thatisabsolutelyes-
sentialinordertocreatesustaineddemandformassmar-
ket productsand servicesandtherefore drivetheecono-
my. If we can do that successfully, thenthe free market
economy can continue to operate and generate broad-
basedprosperityindefinitely.
*
Somepeoplemightobjecttotheideaofincorporatingenvironmen-
talincentivesintoincomeasgovernmentintrusion.Remember,how-
ever,weareonlytalkingaboutincomethatisprovidedbythegovern-
ment. Individuals with private sources of income would be free to
ignoretheincentives.
Transition / 173
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
The obvious questions that arise next are: What
shouldtheseincentivesbe,andwhoshouldsetthem?The
basicincentivesshouldbefairlyobvious;wesimplyneed
tocombinethebestpositiveincentivesthatarecurrently
built into theidea ofa traditional job with additional in-
centivesthatdirectlyaddresstheexternalitiesthatourcur-
rentsystemoverlooks.Iwouldsuggestthattheincentives
shouldberoughlyasfollows:
Education
Themostimportantdeterminantofincomeshouldbethe
levelofeducationachieved.Individualswithmoreeduca-
tionshould earn more. A more educated populationhas
many benefits to society, including a lower crime rate,
greatercivicparticipation,amoreinformedelectorateand
amoreflourishingculturalenvironment.Inaddition,more
educatedindividualsarefarmorelikelytofindfulfillment
inafuturewheretraditionalworktakesupasmallerfrac-
tionofeachperson’stime.
While automation may eventually eliminate full-time
work opportunities for the bulk of thepopulation, there
willcontinuetobeaminorityofindividualswhohavethe
necessaryentrepreneurial skills and knowledgeto partici-
pate actively in driving technological advancement and
economic growth. These individuals will require a high
degreeofeducationandtraining.Byemphasizingtheidea
ofeducationforeveryone,wewillmaximizethenumberof
suchindividualsthatwillbecomeavailableand,therefore,
improve the prospects for continued advancement and
prosperity.
THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 174
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
Iwouldgofurtherandarguethat,inadditiontopro-
vidingincentivesforpursuingformaleducationaldegrees,
weshouldcreateaprogramthatmotivatespeopletorou-
tinelyacquireknowledgebyengagingincontinuingeduca-
tionprogramsorevensimplybyreading.Recentsurveys
haveshownthatthenumberofpeoplewhoregularlyread
books is in continuing decline. Studies have also shown
thatourpopulationis,inmanycases,disturbinglyignorant
of even the most basic knowledge. A recent National
ScienceFoundationsurveyshowedthat20percentofthe
U.S. population actually believes that the sun is in orbit
around theearth!
51
Likewise,too manyAmericanswould
probably be hard pressed to find Iraq or Afghanistan—
twocountriesinwhichweareactivelyengagedinwars—
onamapoftheworld.
Atthesametime,weseemtobemovingincreasingly
towardadirectdemocracymodelinwhichalargelyunin-
formedelectorateisgiveninfluenceoverdetailedgovern-
mentpolicy.InCalifornia,thisoccursliterallyintheform
ofballotinitiatives,butevenatthenationallevel,it hap-
penswhenpoliticiansadjusttheirpositionsbasedonopi-
nionpolls.
Thereisalsostrongevidencetosuggestthatwhilethe
Internet provides unprecedented access to information,
toomanyofus,especiallyamongtheyoungergeneration,
are failing to assimilate that information. The migration
towardasocietyinwhichalargepartoftheaverageper-
son’s knowledge of the world resides not in his or her
Transition / 175
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
brain,butinonlineinformationsourceslikeWikipedia,is
dangerousandunacceptable.
*
Community and Civic Activities
Asecondsetofincentivesshouldbedesignedtomotivate
individuals to participate in activities that enhance com-
munity, civic and culturaldevelopment. Inhis book, The
End of Work, Jeremy Rifkin advocates the creation of a
“third sector” which would be focused on providing
community and social services, and this idea should cer-
tainlybeincorporatedintoourincentivescheme.Itislike-
lythatinthefuture,wemayseeamixofdirectincentive-
based income streams and traditional full or part-time
jobs.
As automation advances, the remaining traditional
jobs are likely to be those that require uniquely human
attributes. In the future, we will continue to need social
workers, community activists, health care workers, and
people who specialize in working with children. By em-
phasizingeducation,wewilllikelycreatemanytraditional
jobsforteachersatalllevels.
*
Incentive incomes could be easily tied to the number of books a
personreads.Futuretechnologyshouldmakeitpossibleforanartifi-
cialintelligencealgorithmtoscanabookandinstantlycreateacom-
prehensiontest.Itis,ofcourse,easytolaughorsneerattheideathat
peopleshouldbepaidtoreadinsteadoftowork.But,asIhavetried
topointouthereagainandagain,ifwetransitionintoanautomated
economy,wewillhavetopaypeopletodosomething—orwewillhave
ageneralcollapseofconsumerdemand.Providingourcitizenswithan
incentive to read and become informed is really not a silly utopian
idea:itisultimatelyamatterofbasicnationalsecurity.
THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 176
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
Itisimportanttonotethatourneweconomicmodel
willnotinanywaypreventindividualswhowishtowork
and can find positions from doing so and earning addi-
tional income. We are simply recognizing that there will
not be enoughof these jobsforeveryone,and thatthey
willnot,bythemselves,provideanadequateincomelevel
for the population. Income earned from traditional jobs
should, in general,beinadditiontoandindependentof,
theincentive-basedincomepaidbythegovernment.This
would ensure that a sufficient incentive exists to attract
workersintoareaswheretraditionalworkisstillrequired.
Journalism
Another area which is related to the idea of civic and
community involvement is professional journalism. The
framersoftheU.S.constitutionrecognizedthatthescru-
tinyofgovernmentprovidedbyafreepresswasessential
tofreedom, and theyacted to ensure that the press was
protectedfromgovernmenttyranny.
Theframerscouldnothaveanticipated,however,that
it would ultimately be the Internet, rather than govern-
ment,thatwouldbetheprimarythreattotheexistenceof
independentjournalism.Whileitislikelythatthepresswill
continue to provide effective scrutiny of government at
the federal level, we already face a significant risk at the
city and local levels. Major cities throughout the United
States,whichusedtosupportcompetingnewspapers,are
nowservedbyonlyasinglepublication.InSanFrancisco,
the survival of the only major newspaper is currently at
severe risk. The existence of one or more credible and
professionalpublicationsthatshineacontinuouslighton
Transition / 177
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
theactionsofgovernmentatalllevelsiscriticaltoeffec-
tivedemocracy,andourincentiveschemecouldrecognize
this by providing direct support to those who engage in
thisactivity.
The Environment and other Externalities
Finally,ourincentiveschememustincorporatetheideaof
externalities,andthemostimportantofthesewillbeenvi-
ronmental in nature. Individuals who make choices that
arepositivefortheenvironmentshouldbepaidmore.By
tyingincomedirectlytoenvironmentallyconsciousactions
wewouldcreatepowerfulincentivesthatwouldminimize
ourcollectivenegativeimpactontheplanet.Byadopting
thisidea,wehavethepotentialtocreateasysteminwhich
economicprosperityisdirectlycoupledwithfavorableen-
vironmental outcomes. In addition, the system would be
flexibleenoughsothatitcouldberefinedtoaddresssig-
nificantexternalitiesthatmightariseinthefuture.
*
*
Anotherobviouspossibilityforincomeincentivesispersonalhealth.
There are a number of health issues, especially obesity, which have
enormouscostsfor bothindividualsandsociety.This,however, is a
very tricky area. A simple approach might be to just pay higher in-
comes to people withina healthy weight range, but this wouldraise
legitimate fairness and discrimination concerns. Another possibility
wouldbetocreateincentivesforhealthybehaviors,butthiswouldbe
difficulttotrackandverify.Ingeneral,health-basedincentiveswould
requirethegovernmenttohaveaccesstoandtrackalotofveryper-
sonalinformation,andthiswouldlikelyraiseprivacyconcernsandthe
specter of Big Brother. For these reasons, I have relegated health-
basedincentivestoafootnote,butthismaybeafertileareaforfur-
therthoughtanddiscussion.