Tải bản đầy đủ (.pdf) (16 trang)

Báo cáo hóa học: "Research Article Existence of Solutions for a Class of Elliptic Systems in RN Involving the p x , q x -Laplacia" pptx

Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (549.18 KB, 16 trang )

Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Journal of Inequalities and Applications
Volume 2008, Article ID 612938, 16 pages
doi:10.1155/2008/612938
Research Article
Existence of Solutions for a Class of Elliptic
Systems in
R
N
Involving the px,qx-Laplacian
S. Ogras, R. A. Mashiyev, M. Avci, and Z. Yucedag
Department of Mathematics, Dicle University, 21280 Diyarbakir, Turkey
Correspondence should be addressed to R. A. Mashiyev,
Received 4 April 2008; Accepted 17 July 2008
Recommended by M. Garcia Huidobro
In view of variational approach, we discuss a nonlinear elliptic system involving the px-
Laplacian. Establishing the suitable conditions on the nonlinearity, we proved the existence of
nontrivial solutions.
Copyright q 2008 S. Ogras et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative
Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in
any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
The paper concerns the existence of nontrivial solutions for the following nonlinear elliptic
system:
−Δ
px
u 
∂F
∂u
x, u, υ in R
N


,
−Δ
qx
υ 
∂F
∂υ
x, u, υ in R
N
,
P,Q
where px and qx are two functions such that 1 <px,qx <NN ≥ 2, for every
x ∈ R
N
. However, F ∈ C
1
R
N
× R
2
 and Δ
px
is the px-Laplacian operator defined by
Δ
px
u  div|∇u|
px−2
∇u. Using a variational approach, the authors prove the existence of
nontrivial solutions.
Over the last decades, the variable exponent Lebesgue space L
px

and Sobolev space
W
1,px
1–5 have been a subject of active research stimulated mainly by the development
of the studies of problems in elasticity, electrorheological fluids, image processing, flow in
porous media, calculus of variations, and differential equations with px-growth conditions
6–13.
Among these problems, the study of px-Laplacian problems via variational methods
is an interesting topic. A lot of researchers have devoted their work to this area 14–22.
2 Journal of Inequalities and Applications
The operator Δ
px
u : div|∇u|
px−2
∇u is called px-Laplacian, where p is a continuous
nonconstant function. In particular, if px ≡ p constant, it is the well-known p-Laplacian
operator. However, the px-Laplace operator possesses more complicated nonlinearity than
p-Laplace operator due to the fact that Δ
px
is not homogeneous. This fact implies some
difficulties, as for example, we cannot use the Lagrange multiplier theorem and Morse
theorem in a lot of problems involving this operator.
In literature, elliptic systems with standard and nonstandard growth conditions have
been studied by many authors 23–28, where the nonlinear function F have different and
mixed growth conditions and assumptions in each paper.
In 29, the authors show the existence of nontrivial solutions for the following p-
Laplacian problem:
−Δ
p
u 

∂F
∂u
x, u, υ in R
N
,
−Δ
q
υ 
∂F
∂υ
x, u, υ in R
N
,
1.1
where F ∈ C
1
R
N
× R
2
 yields some mixed growth conditions and the primitive F being
intimately connected with the first eigenvalue of an appropriate system. Using a weak
version of the Palais-Smale condition, that is, Cerami condition, they apply the mountain
pass theorem to get the nontrivial solutions of the the system.
In 30, the author obtains the existence and multiplicity of solutions for the following
problem:
− div|∇u|
px−2
∇u
∂F

∂u
x, u, υ in Ω,
− div|∇υ|
qx−2
∇υ
∂F
∂υ
x, u, υ in Ω,
u  0, υ  0onΩ,
1.2
where Ω ⊂ R
N
is a bounded domain with a smooth boundary ∂Ω,N ≥ 2, p, q ∈
C
Ω
2
,px > 1,qx > 1, for every x ∈ Ω. The function F is assumed to be continuous
in x ∈
Ω and of class C
1
in u, υ ∈ R. Introducing some natural growth hypotheses on the
right-hand side of the system which will ensure the mountain pass geometry and Palais-
Smale condition for the corresponding Euler-Lagrange functional of the system, the author
limits himself to the subcritical case for function F to obtain the existence and multiplicity
results.
In the paper 31, Xu and An deal with the following problem:
− div|∇u|
px−2
∇u|u|
px−2

u 
∂F
∂u
x, u, υ in R
N
,
− div|∇υ|
qx−2
∇υ|υ|
qx−2
υ 
∂F
∂υ
x, u, υ in R
N
,
u, υ ∈ W
1,px
R
N
 × W
1,qx
R
N
,
1.3
where N ≥ 2,px,qx are functions on R
N
. The function F is assumed to satisfy
Caratheodory conditions and to be L


in x ∈ R
N
and C
1
in u, υ ∈ R. By the critical point
S. Ogras et al. 3
theory, the authors use the two basic results on the existence of solutions of the system; these
results correspond to the sublinear and superlinear cases for p  2, respectively.
Inspired by the above-mentioned papers, we concern the existence of nontrivial
solutions of problem P,Q. We know that in the study of px-Laplace equations in R
N
,the
main difficulty arises from the l ack of compactness. So, establishing some growth conditions
on the right-hand side of the system which will ensure the mountain pass geometry
and Cerami condition for the corresponding Euler-Lagrange functional J and applying a
subcritical case for function F, we will overcome this difficulty.
2. Notations and preliminaries
We will investigate our problem P,Q in the variable exponent Sobolev space W
1,px
0
R
N
,
so we need to recall some theories and basic properties on spaces L
px
R
N
 and W
1,px

R
N
.
Set
C

R
N


h ∈ CR
N
 :inf
x∈R
N
hx > 1

. 2.1
For every h ∈ C

R
N
, denote
h

: inf
x∈R
N
hx,h


: sup
x∈R
N
hx. 2.2
Let us define by UR
N
 the set of all measurable real-valued functions defined on R
N
.
For p ∈ C

R
N
, we denote the variable exponent Lebesgue space by
L
px
R
N


u ∈UR
N
 :

R
N
|ux|
px
dx < ∞


, 2.3
which is equipped with the norm, so-called Luxemburg norm 1, 3, 4:
|u|
px
: |u|
L
px
R
N

 inf

λ>0:

R
N




ux
λ




px
dx ≤ 1

, 2.4

and L
px
R
N
, |·|
L
px
R
N

 becomes a Banach space, we call it generalized Lebesgue space.
Define the variable exponent Sobolev space W
1,px
R
N
 by
W
1,px
R
N
{u ∈ L
px
R
N
 : |∇u|∈L
px
R
N
}, 2.5
and it can be equipped with the norm

u
1,px
: u
W
1,px
 |u|
px
 |∇u|
px
∀u ∈ W
1,px
R
N
. 2.6
The space W
1,px
0
R
N
 is denoted by the closure of C

0
R
N
 in W
1,px
R
N
 and it is
equipped with the norm for all u ∈ W

1,px
0
R
N
:
u
px
 |∇u|
px
∀u ∈ W
1,px
0
R
N
. 2.7
If p

> 1, then the spaces L
px
R
N
,W
1,px
R
N
, and W
1,px
0
R
N

 are separable and
reflexive Banach spaces.
4 Journal of Inequalities and Applications
Proposition 2.1 see 1, 3, 4. The conjugate space of L
px
R
N
 is L
p

x
R
N
, where 1/p

x
1/px1. For any u ∈ L
px
R
N
 and v ∈ L
p

x
R
N
, we have






R
N
uv dx






1
p


1
p




|u|
px
|v|
p

x
≤ 2|u|
px
|v|

p

x
. 2.8
Proposition 2.2 see 1, 3, 4. Denote 
px
u

R
N
|ux|
px
dx for all u ∈ L
px
R
N
, one has
min

|u|
p

px
, |u|
p

px

≤ 
px

u ≤ max

|u|
p

px
, |u|
p

px

. 2.9
Proposition 2.3 see 1. Let px and qx be measurable functions such that px ∈ L

R
N

and 1 ≤ pxqx ≤∞, for a.e. x ∈ R
N
. Let u ∈ L
qx
R
N
,u
/
 0. Then,
|u|
pxqx
≤ 1 ⇒|u|
p


pxqx



|u|
px


qx
≤|u|
p

pxqx
,
|u|
pxqx
≥ 1 ⇒|u|
p

pxqx



|u|
px


qx
≤|u|

p

pxqx
.
2.10
In particular, if pxp is constant, then
||u|
p
|
qx
 |u|
p
pqx
. 2.11
Proposition 2.4 see 3, 4. If u, u
n
∈ L
px
R
N
,n 1, 2, ,then the following statements are
equivalent to each other:
1 lim
n→∞
|u
n
− u|
px
 0,
2 lim

n→∞
u
n
− u0,
3 u
n
→ u in measure in R
N
and lim
n→∞
u
n
u.
Definition 2.5. 1 <px <Nand for all x ∈ R
N
,letdefine
p

x





Npx
N − px
if px <N,
∞ if px ≥ N,
where p


x is the so-called critical Sobolev exponent of px.
Proposition 2.6 see 1, 32. Let px ∈ C
0,1

R
N
, that is, Lipschitz-continuous function defined
on R
N
, then there exists a positive constant c such that
|u|
p

x
≤ cu
px
, 2.12
for all u ∈ W
1,px
0
R
N
.
In the following discussions, we will use the product space
W
px,qx
: W
1,px
0
R

N
 × W
1,qx
0
R
N
, 2.13
S. Ogras et al. 5
which is equipped with the norm
u, υ
px,qx
: max

u
px
 υ
qx

∀u, υ ∈ W
px,qx
, 2.14
where u
px
resp., u
qx
 is the norm of W
1,px
0
R
N

resp., W
1,qx
0
R
N
. The space
W

px,qx
denotes the dual space of W
px,qx
and equipped with the norm ·
∗,px,qx
.Thus,
J

u, υ
∗,px,qx
 D
1
Ju, υ
∗,px
 D
2
Ju, υ
∗,qx
, 2.15
where W
−1,p


x
R
N
resp., W
−1,q

x
R
N
 is the dual space of W
1,px
0
R
N
resp.,
W
1,qx
0
R
N
,and·
∗,px
resp., ·
∗,qx
 is its norm.
For u, υ and ϕ, ψ in W
px,qx
,let
Fu, υ


R
N
Fx, ux,υxdx. 2.16
Then,
F

u, υϕ, ψD
1
Fu, υϕD
2
Fu, υψ, 2.17
where
D
1
Fu, υϕ

R
N
∂F
∂u
x, u, υϕdx,
D
2
Fu, υψ

R
N
∂F
∂υ
x, u, υψdx.

2.18
The Euler-Lagrange functional associated to P,Q is defined by
Ju, υ

R
N
1
px
|∇u|
px
dx 

R
N
1
qx
|∇υ|
qx
dx − u, υ. 2.19
It is easy to verify that J ∈ C
1
W
px,qx
, R and that
J

u, υϕ, ψD
1
Ju, υϕD
2

Ju, υψ, 2.20
where
D
1
Ju, υϕ

R
N
|∇u|
px−2
∇u∇ϕdx− D
1
Fu, υϕ,
D
2
Ju, υψ

R
N
|∇υ|
qx−2
∇υ∇ψdx− D
2
Fu, υψ.
2.21
Definition 2.7. u, υ is called a weak solution of the system P,Q if

R
N
|∇u|

px−2
∇u∇ϕdx

R
N
|∇υ|
qx−2
∇υ∇ψdx

R
N
∂F
∂u
x, u, υϕdx

R
N
∂F
∂υ
x, u, υψdx,
2.22
for all ϕ, ψ ∈ W
px,qx
.
6 Journal of Inequalities and Applications
Definition 2.8. We say that J satisfies the Cerami condition C if every sequence ω
n
 ∈
W
px,qx

such that
|Jω
n
|≤c, 1  ω
n
J

ω
n
 −→ 0 2.23
contains a convergent subsequence in the norm of W
px,qx
.
In this paper, we will use the following assumptions:
F1 F ∈ C
1
R
N
× R
2
, R and Fx, 0, 00;
F2 for all u, υ ∈ R
2
and for a.e. x ∈ R
N




∂F

∂u
x, u, υ




≤ a
1
x|u, υ|
p

−1
 a
2
x|u, υ|
p

−1
,




∂F
∂υ
x, u, υ





≤ b
1
x|u, υ|
q

−1
 b
2
x|u, υ|
q

−1
,
2.24
where
1 <p

,q

≤ p

,q

< p



, q




,
a
i
∈ L
δx
R
N
 ∩ L
βx
R
N
,b
i
∈ L
γx
R
N
 ∩ L
βx
R
N
,i 1, 2,
δx
px
px − 1
,γx
qx
qx − 1
, px

p

xpx
p

x − px
,
qx
q

xqx
q

x − qx
,βx
p

xq

x
p

xq

x − p

xq

x
;

2.25
F3u, υ·∇Fx, u, υ − Fx, u, υ ≤ 0 for all x, u, υ ∈ R
N
× R
2
\{0, 0}, where ∇F 
∂F/∂u, ∂F/∂υ;
F4 suppose there exist two positive and bounded functions a ∈ L
N/px
R
N
 and b ∈
L
N/qx
R
N
 such that
lim
|u,υ|→0
sup
pxqx|Fx, u, υ|
qxax|u|
px
 pxbx|υ|
qx

1
< lim
|u,υ|→∞
inf

pxqx|Fx, u, υ|
qxax|u|
px
 pxbx|υ|
qx
.
2.26
Let λ
1
denote the first eigenvalue of the nonlinear eigenvalue problem in R
N
:
−Δ
px
u  λax|u|
px−2
u in R
N
,
−Δ
qx
υ  λbx|υ|
qx−2
υ in R
N
.
2.27
It is useful to recall the variational characterization:
λ
1

 inf


R
N
1/px|∇u|
px
1/qx|∇υ|
qx
dx

R
N
ax/px|u|
px
bx/qx|υ|
qx
dx
: u, υ ∈ W
px,qx
\{0, 0}

.
2.28
We will assume that λ
1
is a positive real number for all u, υ ∈ W
px,qx
\{0, 0}. For
more details about the eigenvalue problems, we refer the reader to 17.

S. Ogras et al. 7
3. The main results
We will use the mountain pass theorem together with the following lemmas to get our main
results.
Lemma 3.1. Under the assumptions F1 and F2, the functional F is well defined, and it is of class
C
1
on W
px,qx
. Moreover, its derivative is
F

u, υω, z

R
N
∂F
∂u
x, u, υωdx

R
N
∂F
∂υ
x, u, υzdx ∀u, υ, ω, z ∈ W
px,qx
.
3.1
Proof. For all pair of real functions u, υ ∈ W
px,qx

, under the assumptions F1 and F2,
we can write
Fx, u, υ

u
0
∂F
∂s
x, s, υds  Fx, 0,υ

u
0
∂F
∂s
x, s, υds 

υ
0
∂F
∂s
x, 0,sds  Fx, 0, 0,
Fx, u, υ ≤ c
1
a
1
x|u|
p

 |υ|
p


−1
|u|a
2
x|u|
p

 |υ|
p

−1
|u|b
1
x|υ|
q

 b
2
x|υ|
q

.
3.2
Then,

R
N
Fx, u, υdx ≤ c
2



R
N
a
1
x|u|
p

dx 

R
N
a
1
x|υ|
p

−1
|u|dx 

R
N
a
2
x|u|
p

dx



R
N
a
2
x|υ|
p

−1
|u|dx 

R
N
b
1
x|υ|
q

dx 

R
N
b
2
x|υ|
q

dx

,
3.3

if we consider the fact that
W
1,px
0
R
N
 → L
p

px
R
N
⇒||u|
p

|
px
 |u|
p

p

px
≤ cu
p

px
for p

> 1, 3.4

and if we apply Propositions 2.1, 2.3,and2.6 and take a
i
∈ L
δx
R
N
 ∩ L
βx
R
N
,b
i

L
γx
R
N
, then we have

R
N
Fx, u, υdx ≤ 2c
1

|a
1
|
δx
||u|
p


|
px
 |a
1
|
βx
||υ|
p

−1
|
q

x
|u|
p

x
 |a
2
|
δx
||u|
p

|
px
 |a
2

|
βx
||υ|
p

−1
|
q

x
|u|
p

x
 |b
1
|
γx
||υ|
q

|
qx
 |b
2
|
γx
||υ|
q


|
qx

 2c
1

|a
1
|
δx
|u|
p

p

px
 |a
1
|
βx
|υ|
p

−1
p

−1q

x
|u|

p

x
 |a
2
|
δx
|u|
p

p

px
 |a
2
|
βx
|υ|
p

−1
p

−1q

x
|u|
p

x

 |b
1
|
γx
|υ|
q

q

qx
 |b
2
|
γx
|υ|
q

q

qx

≤ c
3

|a
1
|
δx
u
p


px
 |a
1
|
βx
υ
p

−1
qx
u
px
 |a
2
|
δx
u
p

px
 |a
2
|
βx
υ
p

−1
qx

u
px
 |b
1
|
γx
υ
q

qx
 |b
2
|
γx
υ
q

qx

< ∞.
3.5
8 Journal of Inequalities and Applications
Hence, F is well defined. Moreover, one can see easily that F

is also well defined on W
px,qx
.
Indeed, using F2 for all ω, z ∈ W
px,qx
, we have

F

u, υω, z

R
N
∂F
∂u
x, u, υωdx

R
N
∂F
∂υ
x, u, υzdx,
F

u, υω, z ≤

R
N
a
1
x|u, υ|
p

−1
 a
2
x|u, υ|

p

−1
|ω|dx


R
N
b
1
x|u, υ|
q

−1
 b
2
x|u, υ|
q

−1
|z|dx


R
N
a
1
x|u|
p


−1
|ω|dx 

R
N
a
1
x|υ|
p

−1
|ω|dx


R
N
a
2
x|u|
p

−1
|ω|dx 

R
N
a
2
x|υ|
p


−1
|ω|dx


R
N
b
1
x|u|
q

−1
|z|dx 

R
N
b
1
x|υ|
q

−1
|z|dx


R
N
b
2

x|u|
q

−1
|z|dx 

R
N
b
2
x|υ|
q

−1
|z|dx,
3.6
and applying Propositions 2.1, 2.3,and2.6 and considering the conditions px >px and
qx >qx, it follows that

R
N
∂F
∂u
x, u, υωdx≤ 2

|a
1
|
δx
||u|

p

−1
|
p

x
|ω|
px
 |a
1
|
βx
||υ|
p

−1
|
q

x
|ω|
p

x
 |a
2
|
δx
||u|

p

−1
|
p

x
|ω|
px
 |a
2
|
βx
||υ|
p

−1
|
q

x
|ω|
p

x

≤ 2

|a
1

|
δx
|u|
p

−1
p

−1p

x
|ω|
px
 |a
1
|
βx
|υ|
p

−1
p

−1q

x
|ω|
p

x

 |a
2
|
δx
|u|
p

−1
p

−1p

x
|ω|
px
 |a
2
|
βx
|υ|
p

−1
p

−1q

x
|ω|
p


x

≤ c
4

|a
1
|
δx
u
p

−1
px
|a
1
|
βx
υ
p

−1
qx
|a
2
|
δx
u
p


−1
px
|a
2
|
β
υ
p

−1
qx

ω
px
< ∞,
3.7
and similarly

R
N
∂F
∂υ
x, u, υz dx
≤ c
5

|b
1
|

βx
u
q

−1
px
|b
1
|
γ
x
υ
q

−1
qx
|b
2
|
βx
u
q

−1
px
|b
2
|
γx
υ

q

−1
qx

z
qx
<∞.
3.8
Now let us show that F is differentiable in sense of Fr
´
echet, that is, for fixed u, υ ∈
W
px,qx
and given ε>0, there must be a δ ε, u, υ > 0 such that
|Fu  ω, υ  z −Fu, υ −F

u, υω, z|≤εω
px
 z
qx
, 3.9
for all ω, z ∈ W
px,qx
with ω
px
 z
qx
 ≤ δ.
S. Ogras et al. 9

Let B
r
be the ball of radius r which is centered at the origin of R
N
and denote B

r

R
N
− B
r
. Moreover, let us define the functional F
r
on W
1,px
0
B
r
 × W
1,qx
0
B
r
 as follows:
F
r
u, υ

B

r
Fx, ux,υxdx. 3.10
If we consider F1 and F2, it is easy to see that F
r
∈ C
1
W
1,px
0
B
r
 × W
1,qx
0
B
r
, and in
addition for all ω, z ∈ W
1,px
0
B
r
 × W
1,qx
0
B
r
, we have
F


r
u, υω, z

B
r
∂F
∂u
x, u, υωdx

B
r
∂F
∂υ
x, u, υzdx. 3.11
Also as we know, the operator F

r
: W
px,qx
→ W

px,qx
is compact 3. Then, for all
u, υ, ω, z ∈ W
px,qx
, we can write


Fu  ω, υ  z −Fu, υ −F


u, υω, z





F
r
u  ω, υ  z −F
r
u, υ −F

r
u, υω, z








B

r
Fx, u  ω, υ  z − Fx, u, υ −
∂F
∂u
x, u, υω −
∂F

∂υ
x, u, υzdx




.
3.12
By virtue of the mean-value theorem, there exist ζ
1

2
∈ 0, 1 such that
Fx, u  ω, υ  z − Fx, u, υ
∂F
∂u
x, u  ζ
1
ω, υω 
∂F
∂υ
x, u, υ  ζ
2
zz. 3.13
Using the condition F2, we have






B

r

∂F
∂u
x, u  ζ
1
ω, υω 
∂F
∂υ
x, u, υ  ζ
2
zz −
∂F
∂u
x, u, υω −
∂F
∂υ
x, u, υz

dx











B

r

a
1
x

|u  ζ
1
ω|
p

−1
−|u|
p

−1

 a
2
x

|u  ζ
1
ω|
p


−1
−|u|
p

−1

|ω|dx


B

r

b
1
x

|υ  ζ
2
z|
q

−1
−|υ|
q

−1

 b
2

x

|υ  ζ
2
z|
q

−1
−|υ|
q

−1

|z|dx




.
3.14
By help of the elementary inequality |a  b|
s
≤ 2
s−1
|a|
s
 |b|
s
 for a, b ∈ R
N

, we can write
≤ 2
p

−1
− 1

B

r
a
1
x|u|
p

−1
|ω|dx ζ
1
2
p

−1

B

r
a
1
x|ω|
p


−1
|ω|dx
2
p

−1
− 1

B

r
a
2
x|u|
p

−1
|ω|dx ζ
1
2
p

−1

B

r
a
2

x|ω|
p

−1
|ω|dx
2
q

−1
− 1

B

r
b
1
x|υ|
q

−1
|z|dx ζ
2
2
q

−1

B

r

b
1
x|z|
q

−1
|z|dx
2
q

−1
− 1

B

r
b
2
x|υ|
q

−1
|z|dx ζ
2
2
q

−1

B


r
b
2
x|z|
q

−1
|z|dx,
3.15
10 Journal of Inequalities and Applications
applying Propositions 2.1, 2.3,and2.6, then we have
≤ c
6

|a
1
|
δx
||u|
p

−1
|
p

x
|ω|
px
 |a

1
|
δx
||ω|
p

−1
|
p

x
|ω|
px
 |a
2
|
δx
||u|
p

−1
|
p

x
|ω|
px
 |a
2
|

δx
||ω|
p

−1
|
p

x
|ω|
px
 |b
1
|
γx
||υ|
q

−1
|
q

x
|z|
qx
 |b
1
|
γx
||z|

q

−1
|
q

x
|z|
qx
 |b
2
|
γx
||υ|
q

−1
|
q

x
|z|
qx
 |b
2
|
γx
||z|
q


−1
|
q

x
|z|
qx

,
≤ c
7

|a
1
|
δx
u
p

−1
px
 |a
1
|
δx
ω
p

−1
px




|a
2
|
δx
u
p

−1
px
 |a
2
|
δx
ω
p

−1
px

ω
px


|b
1
|
γx

υ
q

−1
qx
 |b
1
|
γx
z
q

−1
qx



|b
2
|
γx
υ
q

−1
qx
 |b
2
|
γx

z
q

−1
qx

z
qx
,
3.16
and by the fact that
|a
i
|
L
δx
B

r

−→ 0,
|b
i
|
L
γx
B

r


−→ 0
3.17
for i  1, 2, as r →∞, and for r sufficiently large, it follows that





B

r

Fx, u  ω, υ  z − Fx, u, υ −
∂F
∂u
x, u, υω −
∂F
∂υ
x, u, υ

zdx




≤ εω
px
 z
qx
.

3.18
It remains only to show that F

is continuous on W
px,qx
. Let u
n

n
, u, υ ∈
W
px,qx
such that u
n

n
 → u, υ. Then, for ω, z ∈ W
px,qx
, we have
|F

u
n

n
ω, z −F

u, υω, z|≤|F

r

u
n

n
ω, z −F

r
u, υω, z|






B

r

∂F
∂u
x, u
n

n

∂F
∂u
x, u, υ

ωdx











B

r

∂F
∂υ
x, u
n

n

∂F
∂υ
x, u, υ

zdx





,
3.19
then by F2, we can write

B

r
a
1
x|u
n
|
p

−1
 |u|
p

−1
 |υ
n
|
p

−1
 |υ|
p

−1
|ω|dx

3.20


B

r
a
2
x|u
n
|
p

−1
 |u|
p

−1
 |υ
n
|
p

−1
 |υ|
p

−1
|ω|dx
I

1



B

r
b
1
x|u
n
|
q

−1
 |u|
q

−1
 |υ
n
|
q

−1
 |υ|
q

−1
|z|dx

I
2



B

r
b
2
x|u
n
|
q

−1
 |u|
q

−1
 |υ
n
|
q

−1
 |υ|
q

−1

|z|dx.
3.21
S. Ogras et al. 11
Thus,
I
1


B

r
a
1
x|u
n
|
p

−1
|ω|dx 

B

r
a
1
x|u|
p

−1

|ω|dx 

B

r
a
1
x|υ
n
|
p

−1
|ω|dx


B

r
a
1
x|υ|
p

−1
|ω|dx 

B

r

a
2
x|u
n
|
p

−1
|ω|dx 

B

r
a
2
x|u|
p

−1
|ω|dx


B

r
a
2
x|υ
n
|

p

−1
|ω|dx 

B

r
a
2
x|υ|
p

−1
|ω|dx
≤ c
9

|a
1
|
δx
u
n

p

−1
px
 |a

1
|
δx
u
p

−1
px
 |a
1
|
βx
υ
n

p

−1
qx
 |a
1
|
βx
υ
p

−1
qx
 |a
2

|
δx
u
n

p

−1
px
 |a
2
|
δx
u
p

−1
px
 |a
2
|
βx
υ
n

p

−1
qx
 |a

2
|
βx
υ
p

−1
qx

ω
px.
3.22
Similarly,
I
2
≤ c
10

|b
1
|
βx
u
n

q

−1
px
 |b

1
|
βx
u
q

−1
px
 |b
1
|
γ
x
υ
n

q

−1
qx
 |b
1
|
γ
x
υ
q

−1
qx

 |b
2
|
βx
u
n

q

−1
px
 |b
2
|
βx
u
q

−1
px
 |b
2
|
γx
υ
n

q

−1

qx
 |b
2
|
γx
υ
q

−1
qx

z
qx
.
3.23
Since F

r
is continuous on W
1,px
0
B
r
 × W
1,qx
0
B
r
, then we have
|F


r
u
n

n
ω, z −F

r
u, υω, z|−→0, 3.24
as n →∞. Moreover, using 3.17, when r sufficiently large, I
1
and I
2
tend also to 0. Hence,
|F

u
n

n
ω, z −F

u, υω, z|−→0, 3.25
as u
n

n
 → u, υ, this implies F


is continuous on W
px,qx
.
Lemma 3.2. Under the assumptions F1 and F2, F

is compact from W
px,qx
to W

px,qx
.
Proof. Let u
n

n
 be a bounded sequence in W
px,qx
. Then, there exists a subsequence we
denote again as u
n

n
 which converges weakly in W
px,qx
to a u, υ ∈ W
px,qx
. Then, if
we use the same arguments as above, we have
|F


u
n

n
ω, z −F

u, υω, z|≤|F

r
u
n

n
ω, z −F

r
u, υω, z|






B

r

∂F
∂u
x, u

n

n
 −
∂F
∂u
x, u, υ

ωdx










B

r

∂F
∂υ
x, u
n

n
 −

∂F
∂υ
x, u, υ

zdx




.
3.26
Since the restriction operator is continuous, then u
n

n
  u, υ in W
1,px
0
B
r
 × W
1,qx
0
B
r
.
Because of the compactness of F

r
, the first expression on the right-hand side of the equation

tends to 0, as n →∞, and as we did above, when r sufficiently large, I
1
and I
2
tend also to
0. This implies F

is compact from W
px,qx
to W

px,qx
.
12 Journal of Inequalities and Applications
Lemma 3.3. If F1, F2, and F3 hold, then J satisfies the condition C, that is, there exists a
sequence u
n

n
 ∈ W
px,qx
such that
i |Ju
n

n
|≤c,
ii1  u
n


px
 υ
n

qx
J

u
n

n

∗,px,qx
→ 0 as n →  ∞
contains a convergent subsequence.
Proof. By the assumption ii, it is clear that J

u
n

n
ω, z ≤ ξ
n
→ 0asn →∞for all
ω, z ∈ W
px,qx
. Let us choose ω, zu
n

n

, then we have
ξ
n
≥ J

u
n

n
u
n

n

≥u
n

p

px
 υ
n

q

qx


R
N


∂F
∂u
x, u
n

n
u
n

∂F
∂υ
x, u
n

n
υ
n

dx.
3.27
Moreover, by the assumption i, we can write
c ≥−Ju
n

n
 ≥−
1
p


u
n

p

px

1
q

υ
n

q

qx


R
N
Fx, u
n

n
dx. 3.28
Using the assumption F3, it follows that
ξ
n
 c ≥ J


u
n

n
u
n

n
 − Ju
n

n



1 −
1
p


u
n

p

px


1 −
1

q


υ
n

q

qx


R
N
Fx, u
n

n
dx


R
N

∂F
∂u
x, u
n

n
u

n

∂F
∂υ
x, u
n

n
υ
n

dx


1 −
1
p


u
n

p

px


1 −
1
q



υ
n

q

qx
.
3.29
Thus, the sequence u
n

n
 is bounded in W
px,qx
. Then, there exists a subsequence we
denote again as u
n

n
 which converges weakly in W
px,qx
.
We recall the elementary inequalities:
2
2−p
|a − b|
p
≤ a|a|

p−2
− b|b|
p−2
·a − b if p ≥ 2, 3.30
p − 1|a − b|
2
|a|  |b|
p−2
≤ a|a|
p−2
− b|b|
p−2
·a − b if 1 <p<2, 3.31
for all a, b ∈ R
N
, where · denotes the standard inner product in R
N
. We will show that u
n

n

contains a Cauchy subsequence. Let us define the sets
U
p
 {x ∈ R
N
: px ≥ 2}, V
p
 {x ∈ R

N
:1<px < 2},
U
q
 {x ∈ R
N
: qx ≥ 2}, V
q
 {x ∈ R
N
:1<qx < 2}.
3.32
For all x ∈ R
N
, we put
Φ
n,k
|∇u
n
|
px−2
∇u
n
−|∇u
k
|
px−2
∇u
k
·∇u

n
−∇u
k
,
Ψ
n,k
|∇u
n
|  |∇u
k
|
2−px
.
3.33
S. Ogras et al. 13
Therefore for px ≥ 2, using 3.30, we have
2
2−p


U
p
|∇u
n
−∇u
k
|
px
dx ≤


U
p
|∇u
n
|
px−2
∇u
n
−|∇u
k
|
px−2
∇u
k
·∇u
n
−∇u
k
dx


R
N
Φ
n,k
dx : T
n,k
D
1
Ju

n

n
−D
1
Ju
k

k
D
1
Fu
n

n
−D
1
Fu
k

k
u
n
−u
k



D
1

Ju
n

n

∗,px,qx
 D
1
Ju
k

k

∗,px,qx

u
n
− u
k

px
 D
1
Fu
n

n
 − D
1
Fu

k

k

∗,px,qx
u
n
− u
k

px
.
3.34
When 1 <px < 2, employing 3.31 and Proposition 2.2, it follows

V
p
|∇u
n
−∇u
k
|
px
dx≤

V
p
|∇u
n
−∇u

k
|
px
|∇u
n
||∇u
k
|
pxpx−2/2
|∇u
n
||∇u
k
|
px2−px/2
dx
≤ 2



|∇u
n
−∇u
k
|
px

−px/2
n,k




2/px
×



Ψ
px/2
n,k



2/2−px
≤2 max


R
N
|∇u
n
−∇u
k
|
2
Ψ
−1
n,k
dx


p

/2
,


R
N
|∇u
n
−∇u
k
|
2
Ψ
−1
n,k
dx

p

/2

× max


R
N
Ψ
px/2−px

n,k
dx

2−p

/2
,


R
N
Ψ
px/2−px
n,k
dx

2−p

/2

≤ 2 max

p

− 1
−p

/2
· T
p


/2
n,k
, p

− 1
−p

/2
· T
p

/2
n,k

× max


R
N
Ψ
px/2−px
n,k
dx

2−p

/2
,



R
N
Ψ
px/2−px
n,k
dx

2−p

/2

.
3.35
Since T
n,k
is uniformly bounded in W
1,px
0
R
N
 in accordance with n, k, and by the fact
that J

u
m

m

∗,px,qx

→ 0asm → ∞, F

is compact and by Proposition 2.4, we have
lim
n,k→∞

R
N
|∇u
n
−∇u
k
|
px
dx  0. 3.36
Applying the same arguments, we can find a subsequence of u
n

n
 such that
lim
n,k→∞

R
N
|∇υ
n
−∇υ
k
|

qx
dx  0. 3.37
Therefore by Proposition 2.2, for a convenient subsequence, we have
lim
n,k→∞
u
n

n
 − u
k

k

∗,px,qx
 0. 3.38
Hence, u
n

n
 contains a Cauchy subsequence and so contains a strongly convergent
subsequence. The proof is complete.
14 Journal of Inequalities and Applications
Lemma 3.4. Under the assumptions F1–F4, the functional J satisfies the following.
i There exists ρ,σ > 0 such that u
px
 υ
qx
 ρ implies Ju, υ ≥ σ>0.
ii There exists E ∈ W

px,qx
such that E
px,qx
>ρand JE ≤ 0.
Proof. By F4, we can find ρ>0 such that u
px
 υ
qx
 ρ, so we have
Fx, u, υ <λ
1

ax
px
|u|
px

bx
qx
|υ|
qx

,

R
N
Fx, u, υ <λ
1

R

N

ax
px
|u|
px

bx
qx
|υ|
qx

dx,
3.39
since λ
1
> 0, then we have

R
N
Fx, u, υ <

R
N

1
px
|∇u|
px


1
qx
|∇υ|
qx

dx,
0 <

R
N

1
px
|∇u|
px

1
qx
|∇υ|
qx

dx −

R
N
Fx, u, υJu, υ.
3.40
Hence, there exists σ>0 such that J ≥ σ>0.
Let τ,θ be an eigenfunction relative to λ
1

. Then, using the assumption F4, we can
obtain for >0andt sufficiently large,
Fx, t
1/px
τ,t
1/qx
θ ≥ tλ
1
 

ax
px
|τ|
px

bx
qx
|θ|
qx

. 3.41
Thus,
Jt
1/px
τ,t
1/qx
θt

R
N


1
px
|∇τ|
px

1
qx
|∇θ|
qx

dx


R
N
Fx, t
1/px
τ,t
1/qx
θdx


R
N

1
px
|∇τ|
px


1
qx
|∇θ|
qx

dx
− tλ
1
 


R
N
ax
px
|τ|
px
dx 

R
N
bx
qx
|θ|
qx
dx

,
3.42

then it follows
Jt
1/px
τ,t
1/qx
θ ≤−t

1
p


R
N
ax|τ|
px
dx 
1
q


R
N
bx|θ|
qx
dx

. 3.43
So, we can conclude that lim
t→∞
Jt

1/px
τ,t
1/qx
θ−∞. Hence, for t sufficiently large,
Jt
1/px
τ,t
1/qx
θ ≤ 0. As a consequence, we can say that the functional Ju, υ has a critical
point; and as we know, the critical points of Ju, υ are the weak solutions of the system
P,Q.
Theorem 3.5. The system P,Q has at least one nontrivial solution u, υ.
Proof. By Lemmas 3.3 and 3.4, we can apply the mountain pass theorem to obtain that the
system P,Q has a nontrivial weak solution.
S. Ogras et al. 15
Acknowledgments
The authors want to express their gratitude to Professor M. G. Huidobro and to anonymous
referee for a careful reading and valuable suggestions. This research project was supported
by DUAPK -2008-59-74, Dicle University, Turkey.
References
1 D. E. Edmunds and J. R
´
akosn
´
ık, “Sobolev embeddings with variable exponent,” Studia Mathematica,
vol. 143, no. 3, pp. 267–293, 2000.
2 X L. Fan, J. Shen, and D. Zhao, “Sobolev embedding theorems for spaces W
k,px
Ω,” Journal of
Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 262, no. 2, pp. 749–760, 2001.

3 X L. Fan and D. Zhao, “On the spaces L
px
and W
m,px
,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and
Applications, vol. 263, no. 2, pp. 424–446, 2001.
4 O. Kov
´
a
ˇ
cik and J. R
´
akosn
´
ık, “On spaces L
px
and W
1,px
,” Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, vol.
41116, no. 4, pp. 592–618, 1991.
5 R. A. Mashiyev, “Some properties of variable sobolev capacity,” Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics, vol.
12, no. 3, pp. 101–108, 2008.
6 E. Acerbi and G. Mingione, “Regularity results for stationary electrorheological fluids,” Archive for
Rational Mechanics and Analysis, vol. 164, no. 3, pp. 213–259, 2002.
7 S. N. Antontsev and S. I. Shmarev, “A model porous medium equation with variable exponent
of nonlinearity: existence, uniqueness and localization properties of solutions,” Nonlinear Analysis:
Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 515–545, 2005.
8 Y. Chen, S. Levine, and M. Rao, “Variable exponent, linear growth functionals in image restoration,”
SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 1383–1406, 2006.
9 L. Diening, Theoretical and numerical results for electrorheological fluids, Ph.D. thesis, University of

Frieburg, Freiburg, Germany, 2002.
10 T. C. Halsey, “Electrorheological fluids,” Science, vol. 258, no. 5083, pp. 761–766, 1992.
11 M. Mih
˘
ailescu and V. R
˘
adulescu, “A multiplicity result for a nonlinear degenerate problem arising in
the theory of electrorheological fluids,” Proceedings of The Royal Society of London A, vol. 462, no. 2073,
pp. 2625–2641, 2006.
12 M. R
˚
u
ˇ
zi
ˇ
cka, Electrorheological Fluids: Modeling and Mathematical Theory, vol. 1748 of Lecture Notes in
Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2000.
13 V. V. Zhikov, “Averaging of functionals of the calculus of variations and elasticity theory,” Izvestiya
Akademii Nauk SSSR. Seriya Matematicheskaya, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 675–710, 1986 Russian.
14 C. O. Alves and M. A. Souto, “Existence of solutions for a class of problems in
R
N
involving the px-
Laplacian,” in Contributions to Nonlinear Analysis. A Tribute to D. G. de Figueiredo on the Occasion of his
70th Birthday, T. Cazenave, D. Costa, O. Lopes, et al., Eds., vol. 66 of Progress in Nonlinear Differential
Equations and Their Applications, pp. 17–32, Birkh
¨
auser, Basel, Switzerland, 2006.
15 O. M. Buhrii and R. A. Mashiyev, “Uniqueness of solutions o f the parabolic variational inequality
with variable exponent of nonlinearity,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications. In press.

16 J. Chabrowski and Y. Fu, “Existence of solutions for px-Laplacian problems on a bounded domain,”
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 306, no. 2, pp. 604–618, 2005.
17 X L. Fan, Q. Zhang, and D. Zhao, “Eigenvalues of px-Laplacian Dirichlet problem,” Journal of
Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 302, no. 2, pp. 306–317, 2005.
18 X L. Fan, “Solutions for px-Laplacian Dirichlet problems with singular coefficients,” Journal of
Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 312, no. 2, pp. 464–477, 2005.
19 X L. Fan and Q H. Zhang, “Existence of solutions for px-Laplacian Dirichlet problem,” Nonlinear
Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 1843–1852, 2003.
20 P. H
¨
ast
¨
o, “The px-Laplacian and applications,” The Journal of Analysis, vol. 15, pp. 53–62, 2007.
21 M. Mih
˘
ailescu, “Existence and multiplicity of solutions for an elliptic equation with px-growth
conditions,” Glasgow Mathematical Journal
, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 411–418, 2006.
22 M. Mih
˘
ailescu, “Existence and multiplicity of solutions for a Neumann problem involving the px-
Laplace operator,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 1419–1425,
2007.
23 K. Adriouch and A. El Hamidi, “The Nehari manifold for systems of nonlinear elliptic equations,”
Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 2149–2167, 2006.
16 Journal of Inequalities and Applications
24 S. Antontsev and S. Shmarev, “Elliptic equations and systems with nonstandard growth conditions:
existence, uniqueness and localization properties of solutions,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods &
Applications, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 728–761, 2006.
25 D. G. de Figueiredo, “Semilinear elliptic systems: a survey of superlinear problems,” Resenhas, vol. 2,

no. 4, pp. 373–391, 1996.
26 K. de Th
´
elin and J. V
´
elin, “Existence and nonexistence of nontrivial solutions for some nonlinear
elliptic systems,” Revista Matem
´
atica de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 153–194,
1993.
27 T. Wu, “Multiple positive solutions for semilinear elliptic systems with nonlinear boundary
condition,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 189, no. 2, pp. 1712–1722, 2007.
28 Q. Zhang, “Existence of positive solutions for elliptic systems with nonstandard px-growth
conditions via sub-supersolution method,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol.
67, no. 4, pp. 1055–1067, 2007.
29 A. Djellit and S. Tas, “Existence of solutions for a class of elliptic systems in
R
N
involving the px-
Laplacian,” Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 2003, no. 56, pp. 1–8, 2003.
30 A. El Hamidi, “Existence results to elliptic systems with nonstandard growth conditions,” Journal of
Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 300, no. 1, pp. 30–42, 2004.
31 X. Xu and Y. An, “Existence and multiplicity of solutions for elliptic systems with nonstandard growth
condition in
R
N
,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 956–968, 2008.
32 L. Diening, “Riesz potential and Sobolev embeddings on generalized Lebesgue and Sobolev spaces
L
p·

and W
k,p·
,” Mathematische Nachrichten, vol. 268, no. 1, pp. 31–43, 2004.

×