Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (5.59 MB, 30 trang )
<span class="text_page_counter">Trang 1</span><div class="page_container" data-page="1">
<small>Zobair M. Younossi et al. THE GLOBAL EPIDEMIOLOGY OF NAFLD AND NASH. Hepatology. 2023;77:1335–1347. </small>
<small>Zobair M. Younossi et al. THE GLOBAL EPIDEMIOLOGY OF NAFLD AND NASH. Hepatology. 2023;77:1335–1347. </small>
</div><span class="text_page_counter">Trang 4</span><div class="page_container" data-page="4"><small>Desjonqueres et al. Hepatoma Res 2022;7:16 </small>
</div><span class="text_page_counter">Trang 5</span><div class="page_container" data-page="5">(A) Incidence number of cirrhosis due to NASH; (B) Prevalence number of cirrhosis due to NASH; (C) Death number of cirrhosis due to NASH; (D) DALYs number of cirrhosis due to NASH; (E) Incidence number of liver cancer due to NASH; (F) Prevalence number of liver cancer due to NASH; (G) Death number of liver cancer due to NASH; (H) DALYs number of liver cancer due to NASH.
<small>NASH: nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; DALYs: disability-adjusted life years. Dash line: forecasted NASH burden from 2018 towards 2050 through ARIMA model.</small>
<small>Tianyue Zhang et al. Journal of Cancer 2021, Vol. 12 (10): 2855-2865. </small>
</div><span class="text_page_counter">Trang 6</span><div class="page_container" data-page="6"><small>(A) Prevalence number of cirrhosis due to NASH; (B) DALYs number of cirrhosis due to NASH; (C) Prevalence number of liver cancer due to NASH; (B) DALYs number of liver cancer due to NASH.</small>
<small>NASH: nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; DALYs: disability-adjusted life years. </small> <sub>Tianyue Zhang et al. Journal of Cancer 2021, Vol. 12 (10): 2855-2865. </sub>
</div><span class="text_page_counter">Trang 9</span><div class="page_container" data-page="9"><small>Li Q, Dhyani M, Grajo JR, Sirlin C, Samir AE. Current status of imaging in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.World J Hepatol2018; 10(8): 530-542</small>
</div><span class="text_page_counter">Trang 11</span><div class="page_container" data-page="11">Hepatology department: Screening and Recruitment
<small>Inclusion: - ≥ 18 yo</small>
<small>- Diagnosed fatty liver by imaging: abdominal US or CAP on fibroscan - Nạve treatment for NAFLD or cease treating more than 6 months - Appropriate to perform MRE</small>
<small>Exclusion: </small>
<small>- Co-infection HBV & HCV - Pregnant </small>
<small>- Any underlying cancers </small>
<small>- Alcohol intake: >30g/day (male) and > 20 g/day (female) - End-stage renal disease (ESRD)</small>
<small>- Inapproriate samples, such as severe hemolysis, high turbidity </small>
<small>F0/1 (n=90)F2 (n= 73)F3 (n=95)F4 (n=43)</small>
Enrollment
<small>Routine lab tests</small>
<small>- CTC- LFTs- FIB-4- M2BPGi</small>
Imaging diagnostic: MRE
<small>Major analysis</small>
<small>- Define cut-off values of M2BPGi of each stage</small>
<small>- Perform correlation between M2BPGi and MRE, Fibroscan, and FIB-4- Sub-population analysis: age groups, diabetes, and genders</small>
<small>Statistic: Graphpad Prism version 10.1 </small>
</div><span class="text_page_counter">Trang 13</span><div class="page_container" data-page="13"><small>Jang SY, et al. Ann Lab Med 2021;41:302-309 </small>
<small>Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; APRI, aspartate aminotransfer ase to platelet ratio index; F, fibrosis; FIB-4, fibrosis index based on four fac tors; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; NFS, NAFLD fibrosis score; M2BPGi, Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer. </small>
</div><span class="text_page_counter">Trang 15</span><div class="page_container" data-page="15"><small>Tobari M and Hashimoto E. Gut and Liver, Published online January 3, 2020 </small>
In the older generation, advanced fibrosis was more common than mild fibrosis in both sexes. Data was obtained from Tokyo Women’s Medical University in 1991 to 2018 (n=811: 406 men and 359 women).
</div><span class="text_page_counter">Trang 17</span><div class="page_container" data-page="17">The percentage of cirrhotic NAFLD was higher in women than in men (56% vs 44%), while the percentage of HCC was higher in men than in women (69% vs 31%)
<small>Tobari M and Hashimoto E. Gut and Liver, Published online January 3, 2020 </small>
</div><span class="text_page_counter">Trang 19</span><div class="page_container" data-page="19">Elderly NAFLD patients had significantly more patients with advanced fibrosis (F3–4; 35.4% vs. 13.4%; P < 0.01)
<small>Panyavee Pitisuttithum et al. BMC Gastroenterology (2020) 20:88 </small>
</div><span class="text_page_counter">Trang 21</span><div class="page_container" data-page="21"><small>Hyunmi Kim et al. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4495 </small>
</div><span class="text_page_counter">Trang 24</span><div class="page_container" data-page="24"><small>Jang SY, et al. Ann Lab Med 2021;41:302-309 </small>
Spearman’s rank correlation analysis showed that the serum M2BPGi level (ρ=0.653, P<0.001) and FIB-4 (ρ=0.689, P<0.001) increased with the liver fibrosis stage. There were moderate correlations between APRI (ρ=0.515, P<0.001) and NFS (ρ=0.628, P<0.001) and fibrosis stage, respectively. However, the median APRI score decreased in F4 than in F3, and median NFS decreased in F1 than in F0.
(A) Serum M2BPGi level, (B) APRI, (C) FIB-4, and (D) NFS. The box height represents the
interquartile range, and the line across each box represents the median.
<small>Abbreviations: APRI, aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index; FIB-4, fibrosis index based on four factors; M2BPGi, Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; NFS, NAFLD fibrosis score; ns, not significant. </small>
</div><span class="text_page_counter">Trang 28</span><div class="page_container" data-page="28">