Tải bản đầy đủ (.pdf) (5 trang)

Chapter 095. Carcinoma of Unknown Primary (Part 1) pdf

Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (51.35 KB, 5 trang )

Chapter 095. Carcinoma of
Unknown Primary
(Part 1)

Harrison's Internal Medicine > Chapter 95. Carcinoma of Unknown
Primary
Carcinoma of Unknown Primary: Introduction
Carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) is a biopsy-proven (mainly
epithelial) malignancy for which the anatomic site of origin remains unidentified
after an intensive search. CUP is one of the 10 most frequently diagnosed cancers
worldwide, accounting for approximately 3–5% of all cancer cases. Most
investigators do not consider lymphomas, metastatic melanomas, and metastatic
sarcomas that present without a known primary tumor to be CUP because these
cancers have specific stage- and histology-based treatments that can guide
management.
A standard workup for CUP includes a medical history; physical
examination; and laboratory studies, including liver and renal function tests,
hemogram, chest x-ray, CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis, mammography in
women, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test in men.
With the increasing availability of additional sophisticated imaging
techniques and the emergence of targeted therapies that have been shown to be
effective in several cancers, oncologists must decide on the extent of workup that
is warranted. Specifically, they must consider how additional diagnostic
procedures may affect the choice of therapy and the patient's survival and quality
of life.
The reason tumors present as CUP remains unclear. One hypothesis is that
the primary tumor either regresses after seeding the metastasis or remains so small
that it is not detected. It is possible that CUP falls on the continuum of cancer
presentation where the primary has been contained or eliminated by the natural
body defenses.
Alternatively, CUP may represent a specific malignant event that results in


an increase in metastatic spread or survival relative to the primary. Whether the
CUP metastases truly define a clone that is genetically and phenotypically unique
to this diagnosis remains to be determined.
Introduction
No characteristics that are unique to CUP relative to metastases from
known primaries have been identified. Abnormalities in chromosomes 1 and 12
and other complex abnormalities have been found.
Aneuploidy has been described in 70% of CUP patients with metastatic
adenocarcinoma or undifferentiated carcinoma. The overexpression of various
genes, including Ras, bcl-2 (40%), her-2 (11%), and p53 (26–53%), has been
studied in CUP samples, but they seem to have no effect on response to therapy or
survival.
The extent of angiogenesis in CUP relative to that in metastases from
known primaries has also been evaluated, but no consistent findings have
emerged.
Clinical Evaluation
Obtaining a thorough medical history from CUP patients is essential,
paying particular attention to previous surgeries, removed lesions, and family
medical history to assess potential hereditary cancers. Physical examination,
including a digital rectal examination in men and breast and pelvic examinations
in women, should be performed. Determining the patient's performance status,
nutritional status, comorbid illnesses, and cancer-induced complications is
essential since they may affect treatment planning.
Role of Serum Tumor Markers and Cytogenetics
Most tumor markers, including CEA, CA-125, CA 19-9, and CA 15-3,
when elevated, are nonspecific and not helpful in determining the primary tumor
site. Men who present with adenocarcinoma and osteoblastic metastasis should
undergo a PSA test.
Patients with an elevated PSA should be treated as having prostate cancer.
In patients with undifferentiated or poorly differentiated carcinoma (especially

with a midline tumor), elevated β-human chorionic gonadotropin (βhCG) and
αfetoprotein (AFP) levels suggest the possibility of an extragonadal germ cell
(testicular) tumor.
Cytogenetic studies had a larger role in the past, although interpretation of
these older studies can be challenging. In our opinion, with the availability of
immunohistochemical stains, cytogenetic analyses are indicated only occasionally.
We reserve them for undifferentiated neoplasms with inconclusive
immunohistochemical stains and those for which a high suspicion of lymphoma
exists.

×