Tải bản đầy đủ (.pdf) (72 trang)

government policies and the efficiency of markets

Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (1.51 MB, 72 trang )

Principles of Economics
Session VI
Government Policies and
the Efficiency of Markets

Overview
What are price ceilings and price floors?
What are some examples of each?
How do price ceilings and price floors affect market
outcomes?
How do taxes affect market outcomes?
How do the effects depend on whether
the tax is imposed on buyers or sellers?
What is the incidence of a tax?
What determines the incidence?
1
Overview (cont’d)
How does the tax affect consumer surplus, producer
surplus, and total surplus?
What is the deadweight loss of a tax?
What factors determine the size of this deadweight
loss?
How does tax revenue depend on the size of the tax?

2
Learning Objectives
By the end of this session, students should
understand:
–the effects of government policies that place a
ceiling on prices.
–the effects of government policies that put a floor


under prices.
–how a tax on a good affects the price of the good
and the quantity sold.
–that taxes levied on sellers and taxes levied on
buyers are equivalent.
3
Learning Objectives (cont’d)
By the end of this session, students should
understand:
–how the burden of a tax is split between buyers and
sellers.
–how taxes reduce consumer and producer surplus.
–the meaning and causes of the deadweight loss from
a tax.
–why some taxes have larger deadweight losses than
others.
–how tax revenue and deadweight loss vary with the
size of the tax.
4
Government Policies and
the Efficiency of Markets
Part I
Supply, Demand, and
Government Policies
6
Government Policies That Alter the
Private Market Outcome
 Price controls
–Price ceiling: a legal maximum on the price of a good
or service Example: rent control

–Price floor: a legal minimum on the price of a good or
service Example: minimum wage
 Taxes
– Government can make buyers or sellers pay a specific
amount on each unit bought/sold.
7
Price Controls
 Price controls are not a new idea
–The first recorded attempt: the Code of Hammurabi –
how much corn a farmer could pay for a cow
–Similar attempts in ancient Egypt, Greece, and Rome
–In the former Soviet Union, as well.
–Currently in Venezuela, still similar attempts: refer to an
article in NYTimes “With Venezuelan Food Shortages, Some
Blame Price Controls”
/>shortages-in-grocery-staples.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
History has shown that price controls generally do not
work. Why?

8
Example 1: The Market for
Apartments
Equilibrium without price controls
P
Q
D
S
Rental
price
of apts

$800
300
Quantity of
apartments
Source: Mankiw (2011)
9
How Price Ceilings Affect Market
Outcomes
A price ceiling above the equilibrium price is not
binding – has no effect on the market outcome.
P
Q
D
S
$800
300
Price
ceilin
g
$1000
Source: Mankiw (2011)
10
How Price Ceilings Affect Market
Outcomes
The equilibrium price ($800) is above the ceiling ($500)
and therefore illegal.
P
Q
D
S

$800
Price
ceilin
g
$500
250
400
shortag
e
The ceiling is
now a binding
constraint on the
price, causes a
shortage.
Source: Mankiw (2011)
11
How Price Ceilings Affect Market
Outcomes
In the long run, supply and demand are more price-
elastic. So, the shortage is larger.
P
Q
D
S
$800
150
Price
ceiling
$500
450

shortag
e
Source: Mankiw (2011)
12
Shortages and Rationing
With a shortage, sellers must ration the goods among
buyers.
Some rationing mechanisms: (1) Long lines
(2) Discrimination according to sellers’ biases
These mechanisms are often unfair, and inefficient: the
goods do not necessarily go to the buyers who value
them the most.
In contrast, when prices are not controlled, the rationing
mechanism is efficient (the goods go to the buyers that
value them the most) and impersonal (and thus fair).
13
Example 2: The Market for
Unskilled Labor
Equilibrium without price controls
W
L
D
S
Wage
paid to
unskilled
workers
$4
500
Quantity of

unskilled workers
Source: Mankiw (2011)
14
How Price Floors Affect Market
Outcomes
A price floor below the equilibrium price is not binding –
has no effect on the market outcome.
W
L
D
S
$4
500
Price
floor
$3
Source: Mankiw (2011)
15
How Price Floors Affect Market
Outcomes
The equilibrium wage ($4) is below the floor ($5) and
therefore illegal.
W
L
D
S
$4
Price
floor
$5

400 550
labor
surplus
The floor is a
binding
constraint on the
wage, causes a
labor surplus
(i.e.,
unemployment).
Source: Mankiw (2011)
16
The Minimum Wage
Min wage laws do not affect highly skilled workers, but do
affect teenaged workers.
W
L
D
S
$4
Min.
wage
$5
400 550
unemp-
loyment
Source: Mankiw (2011)
Exercise VI-1: Price controls
40
50

60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
Q
P
S
0
The market for
hotel rooms
D
Determine
effects of:
A. $90 price
ceiling
B. $90 price
floor
C. $120 price
floor
17
Source: Mankiw (2011)
Exercise VI-1 Answer A:
Price controls
40

50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
Q
P
S
0
The market for
hotel rooms
D
The price falls to $90.
Buyers demand
120 rooms, sellers
supply 90, leaving a
shortage.
shortage = 30
Price
ceiling
18
Source: Mankiw (2011)
Exercise VI-1 Answer B:
Price controls

40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
Q
P
S
0
D
Equilibrium price is
above the floor, so
floor is not binding.
P = $100,
Q = 100 rooms.
Price floor
19
The market for
hotel rooms
Source: Mankiw (2011)
Exercise VI-1 Answer C:
Price controls
40

50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
Q
P
S
0
The market for
hotel rooms
D
The price rises to
$120.
Buyers demand 60
rooms, sellers supply
120, causing a
surplus.
surplus = 60
Price floor
20
Source: Mankiw (2011)
Case Study
Fair-Trade Coffee with Price Floor

–Fair-trade coffee is sold through organizations that
purchase directly from growers. The coffee is
usually sold for a higher price than standard coffee.
–The goal is to promote more humane working
conditions for the coffee pickers and growers.
–Fair-trade coffee has become more popular but
only accounts for a small portion of all coffee sales,
in large part because it is substantially more
expensive to produce.
21
Source: Mateer & Coppock (2013)
Case Study (cont’d)
Fair-Trade Coffee with Price Floor
Question:
Suppose that a one-pound bag of standard coffee costs
$8 and that a one-pound bag of fair-trade coffee costs
$12. Congress decides to impose a price floor of $10
per pound. Will this policy cause more or fewer
people to buy fair-trade coffee?


22
Case Study : Suggested Answer
Fair-Trade Coffee with Price Floor
Answer:
–Fair-trade producers typically sell their product at a
higher price than mass-produced coffee brands.
–Therefore, a $10 price floor is binding for
inexpensive brands like Folgers but nonbinding for
premium coffees, which include fair-trade sellers.

–The price floor will reduce the price disparity b/w
fair-trade coffee and mass-produced coffee.


23
Case Study : Suggested Answer
Fair-Trade Coffee with Price Floor
Answer (cont’d):
–A price-floor of $10 reduces the difference b/w the
price of fair-trade coffee and the inexpensive coffee
brands, which now must sell for $10 instead of $8. This
lowers the consumer’s opportunity cost of choosing
fair-trade coffee.
–Therefore, some consumers of the inexpensive brands
will opt for fair-trade instead. As a result, fair-trade
producers will benefit indirectly from the price floor.
–Thus more people will buy fair-trade coffee as a result
of this price-floor policy


24

×