CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION A STUDY OF VIETNAMESE FIRMS IN HCMC

1

Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter introduces the research background, raising the problems, the objectives,
scope and the process of the research were defined in order to solve.
1.1 Overview
The growing of global economy makes the quality of life rising fast and more
comfortable. However, in that process people destroy environment and human life. The
world development is accompanied by wrong side of society such as: natural disasters,
environmental pollution, resource depletion, discriminatory treatment, labor
exploitation and toxic products, etc.
Our earth will be quickly destroyed soon by ourselves. So is it reasonable to continue to
maximize profits at any cost? Will we accept to have a short life left on earth? Or is it
time we all get the same serious look about developing world responsibly and
sustainably? The question has made a major concern from 1953 to date in the process
of business development and the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
also was originated.
Currently, CSR has become a real movement and growth in worldwide. For the current
Euro-American countries, consumers are interested in not only the quality of end
product but also the way that production method which are friendly with environment,
community, human healthy or not. For example, there have been many movements to
boycott products such as fringe food, carbonated soft drinks, fur products, etc. With
social pressure, the enterprise has made CSR initiative as one of the essential and
serious activities, even drafting for their own CSR strategy. For example, a series of
programs have been implemented such as saving energy, reducing carbon emissions in
the production and using recycled materials, solar energy, improving water sources,
building schools, building epidemic diseases research center in developing countries,
2

improving the working environment of employees and helping surrounding
communities. Companies are known as CSR leaders: TNT, Google, Intel, Unilever,

Coca-Cola, GE, Nokia , HSBC, Levi Strauss, Bayer, Dupont, Toyota, Sony, Samsung, etc.
With the ongoing effort to implement CSR, corporations in the world today have
achieved a lot of success from the increasing employee satisfaction, reducing operating
costs to enhance the prestige image in public. Therefore, the implementation of the
CSR is as a key strategy for sustainable development of enterprises.
CSR in Vietnam
The state of CSR in Vietnam is intimately linked to doi moi (renovation) and the effects
of globalization. In December 1986, Vietnam’s Community Party adopted a ‘market-
oriented socialist economy under state guidance.’ Since then, the Vietnamese state and
society have undergone dramatic transformations. Vietnam has been transformed from
a state-led economy to a more market-oriented one. There were challenges to state-
owned enterprises, including foreign investment and donor pressure. Joining the World
Trade Organization (WTO) continued to drive the shift from state to market
orientation. With this shift, CSR, an initiative of the market, comes to the fore. CSR
plays a major role in the environmental and social sustainability of the country. The
forces of doi moi and globalization brought the pressure of international codes of
compliance to Vietnamese firms. Not only did citizens become more aware of the
importance of social responsibility, but the legal code of the country now had greater
need to adapt to meet and enforce international standards. Although Vietnam did not
adopt an explicit CSR policy, the government began to address some CSR-related
issues within the sustainability strategy called Vietnam Agenda 21. This document,
officially signed by the prime minister in 2004, provides a strategy for sustainable
development in Vietnam. It puts people at the center of development, but says that
environmental protection is inseparable from benefits for people. It aims at a balance
3

between the interests of present and future generations so that actions taken now do not
imperil the well-being of the future. The strategy calls for training, workshops and
media outreach to improve understanding of sustainable development and the
management capability to achieve it. Agenda 21 allocates budget for these activities

and calls for efforts to strengthen international cooperation on sustainable development.
In Asia, the trend of interest in CSR is increasing but the development of CSR is still
relatively low. In particular, Vietnam is one country that CSR concerns have been risen fast.
CSR was first introduced into our country through the activities of multinational
companies investing in Vietnam. The contents of CSR performance in these companies
are basic and effective: "I love Vietnam" - Honda Vietnam, educational programs for
personal hygiene for children in the mountainous provinces of Unilever; computer
training program TOPIC64 of Microsoft, Qualcomm and HP; supported programs
surgery of congenital heart defects and supporting victims of Can Tho bridge collapse
by VinaCapital, Samsung; vision rehabilitation program for poor children by Western
Union's, etc.
For domestic enterprises, the initial concern for CSR in the export enterprises such as
garment and footwear (focusing on the treatment of workers and applying the good
work). The Vietnam Business Links Initiative, a multi-stakeholder initiative, developed
a local code of conduct for the footwear sector in the late 1990s. The Initiative now
provides annual CSR Awards for the footwear, garment and textile industries, and
recently initiated an award for CSR in the marine products industry. In addition, large
corporations in Vietnam also implement CSR initiative and build a good image with
the public such as Mai Linh, Duy Loi, ACB, Sacombank, Kinh Do, etc. However, these
activities lack of depth.
4

Most small and medium enterprises in Vietnam is still relatively inactive in CSR issues
such as soy sauce 3MCPD, melamine-tainted milk, petrol station fraud or causing
serious environmental pollution, etc. So clearly, the perception about CSR is incorrect
and not enough that makes the Vietnamese enterprises losing competitive advantages
on their playground and ruin the business environment from indirectly to directly. What
is the reason? Do not managers of the enterprises have fully aware of the importance of
CSR for sustainable development? Or they do not know where they start and how they
implement CSR? Therefore, CSR perception is very important and sensitive.

1.2 Problem Statement
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Vietnam is understood by many ways. Not
all CSR activities and campaigns of Vietnamese organizations are successful. So, how
people perceive about CSR is more important than how they operate. Employees are
more and more conscious of the widening obligations of firms towards the society. This
means that they nowadays perceive CSR as one of the important issues to be
considered by the employees.
The study by Claydon and Doyle (1996) emphasizes the importance of employee
power in organizational angagement. Similarly, in the study by Greenwood (2007)
employees as representatives of the internal side of the organization are identified as
the most salient stakeholders among all others and thus can be expected to have the
biggest power in terms of stakeholder engagement. Therefore, managers and
employees’ perception about CSR is very important in companies beacause it decides
the employees’ attitude and employees’ behavior at work.
Until now, some studies investigate the relationship between employees’ perception
about CSR and different aspects of job satisfaction all over the world. However, there
5

is not any study which find out the relationship between employees’ CSR perception
their job satisfaction in Vietnam.
The main objective of this research is to observe the relationship between employees’
CSR perception and employees’ satisfaction of Vietnamese firms in Ho Chi Minh City
(HCMC).
Thus, this research is to answer two questions:
 Is there any relation between between employees’ CSR perception and
employees’ satisfaction of Vietnamese firms in HCMC?
 How employees’ CSR perception affects on their satisfaction at work?
1.3 Research Scope
This research mainly focus on identifying the key CSR factors influencing employees’
satisfation of Vietnamese firms. The target interviewees are employees and managers

(middle and low level managers).
Quntitative research will be applied to the companies or enterprises in Ho Chi Minh
City (HCMC) only. HCMC is a central commercial city in Vietnam, where attracts
most of important and developing industries in Vietnam.
1.4 Research Process









6













1.5 Research Structure
Chapter 1 Introduction to introduce the research background, the research problem.

Raising the problems, the objectives, scope and the process of the research were
defined in order to solve. Then, Chapter 2 Literature review to present the theorical
concepts and conceptual framework being the base for the research. Hypotheses
according to the conceptual framework selected for this research were discussed and
developed for testing. After that, Chapter 3 Research Methodology to present in more
detail research approach, research design, development of the measurement scales, the
questionnaire and the data analysis approach. And Chapter 4 Data Analysis to present
the resut of research and statistic analysis and discussion. It also concludes on the
theoretical and managerial implications of the research findings. Finally, Chapter 5
Conclusion and Recommendations to propose the conclusions on the research,
limitations and recommendations (if any).


Research Ojective

Literature review

Conceptual Framework

Qualitative research

Quantitative research

Data Analysis

Result and
Conclusion

7

Chapter 2 LITERATURE REVIEW
This chapter presents the theorical concepts and conceptual framework being the base
for the research. Hypotheses according to the conceptual framework selected for this
research are discussed and developed for testing.
2.1 The concept of Corporate Social Responsibility
The basic concept of CSR is that corporations have responsibilities to go beyond the
traditional business objective of maximizing short-term profits and protect and nurture
society and the environment. However, implementation CSR is controversial because
there is no consistent definition of CSR and no accepted way to measure it. Numerous
studies attempt to define “corporate responsibility” from various perspectives, with
descriptions ranging from “corporate philanthropy” to “business ethics”.
The definition of CSR does not come in the form of a single conclusive definition even
though in theory and practice, there were many detailed discussion with regard to the
concept of CSR. In genral, CSR refers to making business decision associated with
ethical values, compliance with legal requirements, and respect for people,
communities and environment. Jones (1980) argues that CSR is the perception that
corporations have an obligation to groups in sciety other than stockolders and beyond
that prescribed by law and union contract. Another definition is from Kotler and Lee
(2005), who defined CSR as “a commitment to improve community well-being through
discretionary business practices and contributions of corporate resources”.
The World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) (2002) defines
CSR as “the commitment of the company to contribute to the sustained economic
development by working with employees, their families, the local community, and the
entire society in order to improve life quality”. Wood (1991) defines CSR as “a
business organization’s configuration of principles of social responsibility, processes of
8

social reponsiveness, and policies, programs, and observable outcomes as they relate to
the firm’s societal relationship”.
Adding on to the definition from the social perspectives, Baker (2003) maintained that

CSR concerns the way companies manage their business processes which positively
affect society aligned to the business. World Bank (2002) describes CSR as the
businesses’ obligations to provide renewable economic development through
cooperation with employees, their families, the local community and society in a
manner that enhances their livelihood and consequently leads to beneficial business and
development.





2.2 Corporate Social Responsibility Theories
2.2.1 Stakeholder theory
Many scholars point to stakeholder theory as an influencing factor in corporate
decisions and motivation to invest in CSR.

Stakeholder theory says an organization’s
survival and success correlates strongly with its ability to align its objectives with that
of its various stakeholders. By satisfying stakeholder demands, corporations develop
trust and loyalty among those stakeholders. More and more corporations promote
socially responsible actions and policies to effectively respond to stakeholder demands.
In this study, CSR concept from Turker (2009) is adopted. Turker (2009) defined CSR as
below
“CSR as corporate behaviors, which aim to affect stakeholders positively
and go beyond its economic interest”.
9

Stakeholders consist of shareholders and investors, employees, customers, suppliers,
governmental organizations, trade associations, environmental groups, and members of
the community where a company operates.

2.2.2 Caroll’s CSR conceptualization - Carroll’s CSR Pyramid
Carroll (1979) first delineated the now-familiar four categories of CSR in a paper on
corporate social performance, depicting them as ordered layers which he labelled
economic, legal, ethical and discretionary responsibilities. Carroll (1979) explained that
the four classes “are simply to remind us that motives or actions can be categorized as
primarily one or another of these four kinds”. The order and relative weighting was “to
suggest what might be termed their fundamental role in the evolution of importance”.
In its first conception, therefore, the framework took a retrospective developmental
perspective, based on the claim that “the history of business suggests an early emphasis
on the economic and then legal aspects and a later concern for the ethical and
discretionary aspects”.
In 1991, Carroll (1991) first presented his CSR model as a pyramid, as shown in Figure
2.1. He once again uses his original historical explanation for the relative weighting,
saying: “To be sure, all these kinds of responsibilities have always existed to some
extent, but it has only been in recent years that ethical and philanthropic functions have
taken a significant place”. He also introduces dependence as a rationale, “beginning
with the basic building block notion that economic performance undergirds all else”.
Finally, he suggests that, although the components are not mutually exclusive, it “helps
the manager to see that the different types of obligations are in a constant tension with
one another”.
10


Figure 2.1 The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility (Carroll, 1991)
Carroll (1999) appeared to briefly retract his dubious equating of philanthropy with
corporate citizenship and to abandon his pyramid concept by reconceiving his model as
“the four faces of corporate citizenship”, but soon returned to his original construct.
Most recently, Carroll reproduced his 1991 CSR pyramid once again, but this time
attempted to incorporate the notion of stakeholders, in terms of which economic
responsibility contains the admonition to “do what is required by global capitalism”,

legal responsibility holds that companies “do what is required by global stakeholders”,
ethical responsibility means to “do what is expected by global stakeholders”, and
philanthropic responsibility means to “do what is desired by global stakeholders”
(author’s original emphasis).
2.3 Previous research about Corporate Social Responsibility and Employees’ job
satisfaction
Albdour & Altarawneh (2012) investigate the impact of internal CSR perception on
employees’ engagement. Specially, this study examines the impact of five CSR factors
namely: training and education, human rights, health and safety, work life balance and
workplace diversity on the two dimensions of employees’ job engagement and
organizational engagement. All CSR factors above make positive impact on
employees’ job engagement and organizational engagement.
11






According to the previous study of Duyu Turker (2009), an original, valid, and reliable
measure of CSR reflecting the responsibilities of a business to varoius stakeholders is
built. A scale for CSR is developed through a systematic scale development process.
There are 42 observation varaibles in four elements: CSR to employee, CSR to
customer, CSR to government and CSR to society and other stakeholders. And four
factors in the previous research of Duyu Turker (2009) have been applied to this
research. So there are four factors to measure CSR perception: CSR to employee, CSR
to customer, CSR to government and CSR to society and other stakeholders.
The study by Aharon Tziner, Yaki Bar, Lior Oren and Gal Kadosh (2011) examines the
connections between employees’ CSR perception and employee dimensions of job
satisfaction and organizational justice. The results show that employees’ CSR

perception is positive related to both job satisfaction and organizational justice. In this
research, the authors use Turker’s CSR scale to measure employees’ CSR perception.
And the model as below




+
+
Internal
CSR
job
engagement
organizationa
l engagement
training and education

human rights

health and safety

work life
balance

workplace diversity

+
+
+
CSR

Job
satisfaction
Organizational
Justice
CSR to society

CSR to
employee

CSR to
customer

CSR to

government

12

2.4 Research Model
H1: There is a positive impact of CSR to employees on Employees’ satisfaction
Employees’ perceptions of CSR are likely have a positive effect on organizational trust
and job satisfaction because CSR activities elavate employees’ self-image and morale
by helping align personal identities with those of the corporation (Lee et al., inpress).
In the theoretical literature, social identity theory suggests that employees and other
stakeholders are more likely to have positive perceptions of an organization when they
feel connected to its objectives (Peterson, 2004). To this end, CSR strategies can
positively enhance the perceptions that employees have their own organization (Brown
and Dacin, 1997), and stakeholders tend to trust company that recognize and resolve
social problems in an ethical manner (Hosmer, 1995). Further, Vlachos et al. (2010)
identified a positive relationship between salespersons’ perceptions of their company’s

CSR and job satisfaction. In the hospitality literature, one recent study found that
multiple dimensions of CSR have significant, positive effects on employees’ job
satisfaction (Lee et al., in press).
H2: There is a positive impact of CSR to customers on Employees’ satisfaction
Carroll (1999) states that economic viability is something business does for society as
well and describe the economic component as a responsibility to produce goods and
servies that customers want and do right thing what customers expect.
The relationship between job satisfaction and customer orientation has been explored in
several studies (e.g., Donavanet al., 2004; Hoffman and Ingram, 1992; Pettijohn et al.,
2007). Results indicated that higher levels of customer orientation encourage
employees to have higher degrees of job satisfaction. This finding is grounded in the
theoretical literature: social exchange theory proposes that individuals engage in
13

reciprocal behaviors and support those from whom they benefit, and Hoffman and
Ingram (1992) apply this to the workplace in finding that customer orientation behavior
positively correlates with job satisfaction. In addition, it seems customer orientation is
associated with job satisfaction (Motowidlo, 1984).
H3: There is a positive impact of CSR to government on Employees’ satisfaction
Based on study by Tziner, Bar, Oren and Kadosh (2011), a significant positive
relationships were found between CSR to government and employees’ job satisfaction.
Especially, the research of Choong-Ki, Hak-Jun, Hye-Mi, Seoki, Bernhard (2012) also
found a significant and positive effect from legal CSR dimension on employees’ job
satisfaction.
According to Sim (2003), “social responsibility” and “legality” are not one and the
same thing. CSR is often seen as acts that go beyond what is prescribed by the law. The
definitions of McGuire (1963) and Davis (1973) state that legal obligations is one of
important compnent of CSR.
H4: There is a positive impact of CSR to society, environment, generations and
NGOs on Employees’ satisfaction

Philanthropic responsibility means to “do what is desired by global stakeholders”
(Caroll, 2004). And according to Choong-Ki, Hak-Jun, Hye-Mi, Seoki, Bernhard
(2012), philanthropic CSR make a positive impact on organizational trust and job
satisfaction.
Besides, a significant positive relationship were found between CSR to social, other
stakeholders and employees’ job satisfaction (Tziner, Bar, Oren and Kadosh, 2011).
Despite the fact that CSR is one of the most prominent concepts in the literature, it still
difficult to give a precise and commonly accepted definition. According to Bowen
14

(1953), one of the first scholars to define the concep CSR “to pursue policies, make
decisions, or to follow lines of action which are desirable in terms of the objectives and
values of our society”. Accoring to Carroll (1991), there is a natural fot between the
idea of CSR and an organization’s stakeholders. In a broader understanding, which can
be attributed to the famous definition of Freeman (1984), stakeholders are “those
groups or individuals who can affect or are affected by the achievement of the
organization’s objecives or are those actors with a direct or indirect interest in the
company”. Therefore, CSR to society and other stakeholder is a important factor in the
scale.
Moderated variable: Position
Previous studies show that managers’ and employees’ concern about CSR are not
totally the same. Managers believe that CSR activities will make benefit and reputation
for enterprises and they focus much on external CSR activities (Jeremy Galbreath,
2009).
Findings of Leonidas, Mary, Theofilos, Amalia (2012) indicate that most companies
have an internal management function that executed CSR programs which were mostly
oriented towards society, environment and employees. Moreover, managers believe
that CSR activities offer a number of benefits. Interestingly, managers who believe that
CSR activities should be communicated and evaluated externally by a national agency
tend to hold a strong positive attitude for the institutionalization of CSR.

Employees’ concern should be higher regarding internal CSR, whereas managers
should consider both dimensions as equally important (Brammer et al, 2005).
According to Tamm, Eamets, Motsmees (2010), managers’ and employees’ assessments
of external CSR are closer to each other than their assessments of internal CSR.

15

Research Model








Fifure 2.2 The proposal research model
H1: There is a positive impact of CSR to employees on Employees’ satisfaction
H2: There is a positive impact of CSR to customers on Employees’ satisfaction
H3: There is a positive impact of CSR to government on Employees’ satisfaction
H4: There is a positive impact of CSR to society, environment, generations and NGOs
on Employees’ satisfaction






H2

H4

H3

CSR to employee
CSR to customer


CSR to government


CSR to society and other stakeholders


job satisfaction
H1

Moderator:
Position

(Employees and Managers)
16

Chapter 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Chapter 2 presents the literature review on CSR and proposed the conceptual model,
hypotheses for the factors influence employees’ satisfaction of Vietnamese firms in
HCMC. This chapter discusses about the research methods with four parts: Research
process, Measurement Scale, Data collection and Data analysis methods.
3.1 Research process
After identifying the research problems and the research objectives, the literature

review of CSR and CSR scales were conducted to look through all the relevant concept
of factors influence CSR and employees’ satisfaction; proposed a conceptual model
with the hypotheses for CSR and employees’ satisfaction of Vietnamese firms in HCMC.
Based on the literature review of CSR, employees’ satisfaction, the pilot research of the
conceptual model has been developed with four main factors of CSR which are
supposed to be influenced employees’ satisfaction of Vietnamese firms in HCMC. The
draft questionnaire was built from the consolidation and citing from previous studies of
the same literature topic. Both qualitative and quantitative methods are conducted in
order to consolidate for the quality of this research. There are two phases in research
design step in this study: pilot survey and main survey. Afterward, the measurement
scales and pilot questionnaires on CSR and employees’ satisfaction were prepared in
qualitative research.
A qualitative research with preliminary questionnaire was conducted with pilot
enterviews with some key interviewees who are employees and managers (middle and
low level managers) in Vietnameses firms by in-depth interview. After that, the sample
size is determined.
17

In the main survey, the qualitative study was conduct to this research by face-to-face
interview method. Questionnaires were sent to 440 interviewees who are employees
and managers coming from different organizations in HCMC. And the main method
which is used to interview in this survey is direct survey and online survey. Data was
collected in two weeks.
After interviewed, there are 410 questionnaire were sent back but only 391
questionnaires in collected samples coulb be used for analyzing because of the missing
problems in the answers. After checking the correction and quality, the data were
imported to SPSS software in order to analyze.
The validation of questionnaires and the reliability of measurement scale of this
research were also tested by using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Cronbach
alpha reliability methods while the Standard Multiple Regression was applied for

hypotheses testing. The research steps were showing in the following figure.









Questionnaire Design

Testing questionn
aire

Data Collection
Assessing the reliability and

validity of data
Exploratory Factor Analysis

(EFA)
Cronbach’s reliability cofficient
Research Hypotheses testing

Regression analysis

18

The research steps of this research consist of seven steps:

Step 1: Initial research model and the draft questionnaire
Based on the literature review, the conceptual model and preliminary hypotheses on
CSR and employees’ satisfaction were developed. While the draft questionnaire which
has based on the various measurement scales in the previous and extent researches was
also designed.
Step 2: Questionnaire refinement by qualitative pilot research
In the first round of this step, the qualitative research with preliminary questionnaire
was conducted with pilot interviews by in-depth inetrview method. This round was
executed with three employees and two middle level managers of some Vietnamese
firms who are friends of author in order to assess the sufficiency of the measurement
scales, the conceptual model and the questionnaire. Then, the sample size was
identified.
Step 3: Quantitative pilot research for the clarity of questionnaire testing
A quantitative pilot research was carried out in this step by face-to-face interview
method in order to test how the interviewees understood not only about the content of
questionnaires but also about the measurement scales of this research. This round was
undertaken with 14 interviewees who also employees and managers in Vietnamese
companies in HCMC. The feedbacs from interviewees in this step were very important
to the questionnaire refinement process and ensure the understanding of most pilot
intervieweesabout this survey. The questionnaire which was refined was also the final
version to be released in the main survey.
Step 4: Data collection
19

The direct survey with attached questionnaires was sent to 360 interviewees with hard
copy. Besides, online survey was also sent with 180 questionnaires. There are 410
questionnaires replied and only 391 questonnaires were used for data analysis step.
Step 5: The validity of scales testing with Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) method
After collecting data from main survey, the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) method
was applied to explore the inter relationship between the variables.

The correlation matrix for evidence of coefficient should be greater than 0.3.
Barlett’s test was smaller 0.05 (p<0.05)
The KMO index was greater than 0.6 (the range from 0 to 1)
Consequently, the hypotheses model was modified.
Step 6: Cronbach Alpha Analysis
Cronbach Alpha Analysis method was applied to assess the reliabiity of measurement
scales by testing the consistent of the internal variables in the same factors. The scale
was considered as the reliable scale when the Cronbach Alpha coefficient was greater
than 0.7.
Step 7: Standard Multiple Regression
The Standard Multiple Regression was used for the hypotheses testing.
3.2 Data Collection
3.2.1 The primary data
20

The primary data was collected by face-to-face interviews method by traditional survey
with hard copies and by the online survey (which was sent by emails to the
interviewees). The interviewees are employees and managers of Vietnamese firms in HCMC.
3.2.2 The Secondary data
The extant literature, international business journals, articles, books, and professional
newspapers are useful sources of relevant information contributing tho the research.
The internet information from the business or expertise websites are also the valuable
sources for collecting related information to this research.
3.3 Field Work Organization
3.3.1 Sampling method
In order to have valuable and reliable database, the sampling method shoud be executed
carefully.
The target interviewees of this research are employees and managers of Vietnamese
firms in HCMC.
According to Hair et al. (2006), the sample size is considered as suitable for the

reliability of the research should be
n≥ 100 and n ≥ 5k (where k is equal to the number of variables)
Therefore, in this study the minimum sample size for this research is
n = 5 x 51 = 255 (k=51 is the number of variables)
Otherwise, Tabachnick & Fidell (2001) illustrated the minimum sample size which is
required for the multiple regressions should be:
n ≥ 50 + 8m (where m is equal to the number of independent factors)
21

There are four independent factors in thi study. And the minimum sample size is
required for the multiple regressions:
n ≥ 50 + (8 x 4) = 82
Consequently, the minimum size for this research is 82
Finally, the sample size is used for this research was 391. While the sent back
questionnaires are 410, there were 440 questionnaires sent out to the interviewees.
3.3.2 Qualitative research
Before having the final questionnaire, the preliminary questionnaire as pilot method
was sent to some key employees and managers of some Vietnamese companies by in-
depth interview method in order to check the content of the measurement and find out
the mistakes of questionnaire. After that, the quantitative research in pilot research
period is also conducted with randomly-selected 14 interviewees who are targeted
interviewees as mentioned come from Vietnamese companies located in HCMC by
face-to-face interviews for final test before launching the final survey.
The information is collected in in-depth interview in order to identify the influence of
the independent factors (CSR to employee, CSR to society and other stakeholders, CSR
to Government and CSR to customer) on employees’ satisfaction of Vietnamese firms
in HCMC.
All the comments from the interviewees gathered in pilot study is to revise the
measurement scales and questionnaires. The misunderstanding mistakes or duplicated
issues (between the variables) were also mentioned by the interviewees to ensure that

the questionnaire could be understood more clearly and easily.

22

3.4 Measurement scales
3.4.1 Measurement construct
All the factors from the model in this research are original from many previous studies
with citing. Based on the literature review briefing, the most appropriate measurement
scale is a multivariate scale applied for this study.
They are four independent factors adapted to fit the characteristic and culture of
Vietnamese: CSR to employee, CSR to Government and CSR to customer, CSR to
society and other stakeholders. In order to executed the quantitative study in this
research, the Five-point Likert scale was used in the questionnaire for survey.
(1) Strongly disagree
(2) Disagree
(3) Neutral
(4) Agree
(5) Strongly Agree
Questionnaires were designed with this Five-point Likert scale (Likert, 1932) which
was used measure the degree of CSR and employees’ satisfaction of Vietnamese firms
in HCMC. Hence, the measurement scales for the research model which is showing in
the following table.
Variables

Questions Sources
CSR to employee
CE01 Our company provides a wide range of indirect benefits
to improve the quality of employees’ lives
Adapted from
Duygu Turker,

23

CE02 The employees in our company receive a reasonable
salary to maintain an acceptable quality of life
2009
CE03 Our company policies provide a safe and healthy
working environment to all its employees
CE04 Our company supports employees who want to acquire
additional education
CE05 There are sufficient numbers of opportunities to develop
my skills in my current job
CE06 Our company policies encourage the employees to
develop their skills and careers
CE07 Company usually make change for employees take care
health
Newly
developed
CE08 Company does right guarantee policies for employees Newly
developed
CE09 Our company implements flexible policies to provide a
good work & life balance for its employees
Adapted from
Duygu Turker,
2009
CE10 The management of our company is primarily concerned
with employees’ needs and wants
CE11 The managerial decisions related with the employees are
usually fair
CE12 I believe that our company provides equal opportunities
24

to all its employees
CSR to customer
CC01 One of the main principles of our company is to provide
high-qualityproducts to its customers
Adapted from
Duygu Turker,
2009
CC02 Our prducts comply with the national and international
standard
CC03 The guarantee extension of our products is the most
advantageous choice in the market
CC04 Our company provides full and accurate information
about its product to customers
CC05 Our company respects consumers’ right beyond the legal
requirement
CC06 Customer satisfaction is highly important for our
company
CC07 Our company is responsive to the complain of its
customers
CC08 Our company is known as a respected and trustworthy
company
CSR to Government
CG01 Our company always pays its taxes on a regular
continuing basis
Adapted from
Duygu Turker,
25

CG02 Our company complies with legal regulations

completely and promtly
2009
CG03 Our company tries to help the government in solving
social problems
CG04 Our company acts legally on all matter
CSR to society and other stakeholders
CS01 Our company implements special programs to minimize
its negative impact on the natural environment
Adapted from
Duygu Turker,
2009
CS02 Our company participates in activities which aim to
protect and improve the quality of the natural
environment
CS03

Our company has the necessary equipment to reduce its
negative environmental impact
CS04

Our company make a well-planned investments to avoid
environmental degradation
CS05 Our company targets sustainable growth which considers
future generations
Adapted from
Duygu Turker,
2009
CS06 Our company make the investments to create a better life
for future generations
CS07 Our company make the investments to create

employment opportunities for future generations