Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (44.03 KB, 2 trang )
Topic artists or scientists
People are always estimating whether the scientists or the artists are
valued more by the society. If there is one preference-which I take
leave to make-then it is the scientists rather than the artists are more
highly estimated by people. Admittedly, never could we ignore the
advantages brought about by artists. One thing is certain that human
beings can hardly live without any mental support that is mainly
from the works of artists, both past and contemporary. Merely
abundant in materials, people are likely to be addicted to toxic so
called leisure? Only when they acquired meaningful hobbies were
they capable of living pleasant lives, just like drawing, creating,
appreciating classical works composed by enlightening matters
around them. Artists with extraordinary abilities are able to show
people the beauty and meaning of their life and lead them to
discover the innate brilliance hidden inside commonplace things.
Unfortunately, the larger part of the population forgets about it
sometimes unconsciously. Adversely, it seems that contributions of
scientists are more critical to the society and valued more by the
society. The first reason for my propensity is that scientists exert
such tremendous influences on
almost every aspect of people's lives even on the overall society. It is
obvious that most revolutions of the society stem from innovations of
science and technology. Take the Industrial Revolution for instance, it
was the invention of the steam engine by Watt that overthrew the
conventional ways of doing labor work. Millions of people were
relieved of arduous and continuous boring work. Simultaneously the
capability of producing goods roars so fascinatingly that the
mercantile becomes more and more plentiful while consumers hold
more and more money for their pleasant consumptions. Another subtle
reason why I advocate that scientific improvements are far more
highly estimated rests on the persistent attention and occasionally