6
Chapter
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
Selection and
Placement
Objectives
• Establish the basic scientific properties of
personnel selection methods, including
reliability, validity, and generalizability.
• Discuss how the particular characteristics of a
job, organization, or applicant affect the utility of
any test.
• Describe the government’s role in personnel
selection decisions, particularly in the areas of
constitutional law, executive orders, and judicial
precedents.
• List the common methods used in selecting
human resources.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies,
6-2
Selection Method Standards for
Evaluation Purposes
Reliability
Reliability
Validity
Validity
Generalizability
Generalizability
Utility
Utility
Legality
Legality
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
© The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Reliability
6-3
The degree to which a measure is consistent over
Reliability = .95
Measure
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
Reliability = .7
Measure
© The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Reliability-Correlation Coefficient
6-4
Is a measure of the degree to which two sets of
numbers are related.
A perfect positive relationship equals + 1.0
A perfect negative relationship equals -1.0
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
© The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Reliability
6-5
Test-retest reliability-- How scores on the measure at
one time relate to scores on the same measure at
another time.
The consistency of multiple items or scales can also be
assessed via split-half reliability estimates.
Inter-rater reliability estimates-- two different human
judges rate the person on the dimensions of interest, it
is then correlated.
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
© The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Validity
6-6
The extent to which performance on a measure is
related to job performance.
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
Criterion-related
Criterion-related
predictive
predictive
concurrent
concurrent
Content
Content
© The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Criterion- Related
Validity
6-7
Determines a relationship between selection test
scores and job performance.
Predictive
Measure
performance
of those hired
test
applicants
TIME
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
© The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Criterion - Related
Validity
6-8
Determines a relationship between selection test
scores and job performance.
Predictive
Measure
performance
of those hired
test
applicants
TIME
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
Concurrent
test
existing
employees
Measure
their
performance
TIME
© The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Validity Testing--Predictive
6-9
Minimum
Level
PERFORMANCE
..
.. .
.
.
TEST SCORE
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
© The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Validity Testing--Predictive
6-10
Minimum
Level
PERFORMANCE
..
..
REJECT
.
.
ACCEPT
TEST SCORE
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
© The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Validity Testing--Predictive
6-11
ERROR
PERFORMANCE
Minimum
Level
..
..
..
SUCCESS
FAILURE
ERROR
REJECT
ACCEPT
TEST SCORE
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
© The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Content Validity
6-12
Test items are representative of the job situation.
Determined through expert judgment.
Content Validity Ratio (CVR)
CVR =
where
ne
n e - N/2
N/2
= number of experts who
rate item as “essential”
N = total number of experts
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
© The McGraw-Hill Companies,
6-13
Required Level of CVR
to reach Statistical Significance as a function of
the Number of Judges
1.0
Required
CVR
.75
.50
.25
5
10 15 20 25 30
Number of Judges
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
© The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Generalizability
6-14
Degree to
to which
which one
one can
can extend
extend validity
validity
Degree
to other
other contexts
contexts
to
Three contexts
contexts include
include
Three
different situations
situations
different
especially true
true for
for more
more complex
complex jobs
jobs
especially
different samples
samples of
of people
people
different
more similar
similar across
across race
race and
and gender
gender
more
than thought
thought
than
different time
time periods
periods
different
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
© The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Utility
6-15
Degree to which information from selection
method enhances bottom line effectiveness.
Does the test increase the accuracy of the
selection process?
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
© The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Low Utility
6-16
Success
70%
15%
Minimum
Level
5%
10%
Failure
PERFORMANCE
ERROR
REJECT
without test - 85% accuracy
with test
- 87% accuracy
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
ACCEPT
TEST SCORE
© The McGraw-Hill Companies,
High Utility
6-17
Minimum
Level
20%
40%
SUCCESS
30%
10%
FAILURE
PERFORMANCE
ERROR
REJECT
without test - 50% accuracy
with test
- 75% accuracy
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
ACCEPT
TEST SCORE
© The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Legality
6-18
Constitutional law
law used
used sparingly
sparingly
Constitutional
Legislation (CRA,
(CRA, ADEA,
ADEA, ADA)
ADA)
Legislation
employers need
need to
to establish
establish business
business
employers
necessity for
for any
any method
method showing
showing adverse
adverse
necessity
impact
impact
prohibits preferential
preferential treatment
treatment for
for
prohibits
protected groups
groups
protected
Executive Orders
Orders (( 11246)
11246)
Executive
prohibits discrimination
discrimination
prohibits
mandates affirmative
affirmative action
action to
to hire
hire qualified
qualified
mandates
minorities for
for government
government contracts
contracts
minorities
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
© The McGraw-Hill Companies,
6-19
AdverseERROR
Impact
Majority
SUCCESS
Minimum
Level
Protected
FAILURE
PERFORMANCE
ERROR
REJECT
ACCEPT
TEST SCORE
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
SelectionRatio
Ratioof
ofmajority
majority=
=60%,
60%,
IfIfSelection
forAdverse
AdverseImpact
Impactto
tooccur
occurthe
the
for
SelectionRatio
Ratioof
ofprotected
protectedclass
class
Selection
mustbe
beless
lessthan
than(4/5
(4/5of
of60%)
60%)or
or
must
48%.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies,
48%.
Types of Selection Methods
6-20
Selection interviews are defined as a dialogue
initiated by one or more persons to gather information
and evaluate the qualifications of an applicant for
employment.
References and biographical data gather
background information on candidates.
Physical ability test-- relevant for predicting not
only job performance but occupational injuries and
disabilities.
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
© The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Types of Selection Methods
(cont.)
6-21
Cognitive ability test differentiate candidates on
mental ability.
Personality inventories categorize individuals by
their personality characteristics.
Work samples simulate the job
Honesty tests and drug tests
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
© The McGraw-Hill Companies,
6-22
Evaluating Various Selection
Methods
Interview
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
References
Low
Low
Low
Low
Libel?
Bio-data
High
High
Physical Ability
High
Mod - High
Low
Moderate
High
Low
Low
Cognitive Ability High
Personality
High
Low
Low
Work-samples
High
High
Drug
High
High
Honesty
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
Insufficient
Adverse Impact
-sex,race
Moderate Adverse
Impact-sex
Adverse
High
Impact-race
Job specific High
Low
Low
Low
Low
Job specific High
High
High
Costly
Privacy
Information
© The McGraw-Hill Companies,