CHAPTER 8
Selecting Human Resources
Section 2 Staffing the Organization
© 2008 Thomson/South-Western All rights reserved.
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook
The University of West Alabama
Chapter
Chapter Objectives
Objectives
After you have read this chapter, you should be able to:
■ Discuss how validity and reliability are related to
selection.
■ Diagram the sequence of a typical selection process.
■ Explain the importance of realistic job previews and
application screening efforts to the selection process.
■ Identify three types of selection tests and legal
concerns about their uses.
■ Discuss several types of selection interviews and some
key considerations in conducting these interviews.
© 2008 Thomson/SouthWestern. All rights reserved.
8–2
Chapter
Chapter Objectives
Objectives (cont’d)
(cont’d)
After you have read this chapter, you should be able to:
■ Explain how legal concerns affect background
investigations of applicants and use of medical
examinations in the selection process.
■ Describe the major issues to be considered when
selecting candidates for global assignments.
© 2008 Thomson/SouthWestern. All rights reserved.
8–3
Selection and Placement
• Selection
The process of choosing individuals with
qualifications needed to fill jobs in an organization.
Organizations need qualified employees to succeed.
“Hire
hard, manage easy.”
“Good
training will not make up for bad selection.”
• Placement
Fitting a person to the right job.
© 2008 Thomson/SouthWestern. All rights reserved.
8–4
Applicant Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities
• Person-Job Fit
Matching the knowledge, skills and abilities (KSAs) of
people to the characteristics of jobs (tasks, duties and
responsibilities–TDRs).
Benefits of person-job fit:
Higher employee performance
Lower turnover and absenteeism
• Person-Organization Fit
The congruence between individuals and
organizational factors.
KSAs
=
TDRs
=
Job
Success?
© 2008 Thomson/SouthWestern. All rights reserved.
8–5
Criteria, Predictors, and Job Performance
• Selection Criterion
A characteristic that a person must have to do a job
successfully
• Predictors
The measurable or visible indicators of a selection criterion
• Validity
The correlation between a predictor and job performance
• Reliability
The extent to which a predictor repeatedly produces the same
results, over time
© 2008 Thomson/SouthWestern. All rights reserved.
8–6
FIGURE 8-1
Job Performance, Selection Criteria, and Predictions
© 2008 Thomson/SouthWestern. All rights reserved.
8–7
FIGURE 8-2
Concurrent
and
Predictive
Validity
© 2008 Thomson/SouthWestern. All rights reserved.
8–8
Combining Predictors
• Multiple Hurdles
Establishing a minimum cutoff (level of performance)
for each predictor, and requiring that each applicant
must score at least the minimum on each predictor to
be considered for hiring.
• Compensatory Approach
Scores on all predictors are added together, allowing
a higher score on one predictor to offset a lower score
on another predictor.
© 2008 Thomson/SouthWestern. All rights reserved.
8–9
FIGURE 8-3
Typical Division of HR Responsibilities: Selection
© 2008 Thomson/SouthWestern. All rights reserved.
8–10
HR Employment Functions
1. Receiving applications
2. Interviewing applicants
3. Administering tests to applicants
4. Conducting background investigations
5. Arranging physical examinations
6. Placing and assigning new employees
7. Coordinating follow-up of new employees
8. Exit interviewing departing employees
9. Maintaining employee records and reports
© 2008 Thomson/SouthWestern. All rights reserved.
8–11
FIGURE 8-4
Selection
Process
Flowchart
© 2008 Thomson/SouthWestern. All rights reserved.
8–12
Applicant Job Interest
• Realistic Job Preview
The process through which a job applicant receives
an accurate picture of the organizational realities of
the job.
Prevents the development of unrealistic job
expectations that cause disenchantment,
dissatisfaction, and turnover in new employees.
© 2008 Thomson/SouthWestern. All rights reserved.
8–13
Pre-Employment Screening
• Pre-Screening Interview
Purpose: verify minimum qualifications
• Electronic Screening
There is a large volume
of applicants
Quality of hires needs
to be increased
When To Use
Electronic
Screening
Hiring cycles need
to be shortened
The cost of hiring needs
to be reduced
© 2008 Thomson/SouthWestern. All rights reserved.
There is a need to reach
unvisited geographic areas
8–14
Applications
• Purposes of Applications
Record of applicant’s interest in the job
Provides a profile of the applicant
Basic record for applicants hired
Research effectiveness of the selection process
• Resumes as Applications
Resumes are applications for EEO purposes.
Resumes should be retained for at least three years.
© 2008 Thomson/SouthWestern. All rights reserved.
8–15
Application Disclaimers and Notices
Employment-At-Will
References Contacts
Employment Testing
Application
Form
Application Time Limit
Information Falsification
© 2008 Thomson/SouthWestern. All rights reserved.
8–16
FIGURE 8-5
Acceptable
Documents
for Verifying
Eligibility to
Work in the
United States
© 2008 Thomson/SouthWestern. All rights reserved.
8–17
EEO Considerations and Application Forms
• Applications should not contain illegal (nonjobrelated) questions concerning:
Marital status
Height/weight
Number and ages of dependents
Information on spouse
Date of high school graduation
Contact in case of emergency
© 2008 Thomson/SouthWestern. All rights reserved.
8–18
FIGURE 8-6
Sample
Application
Form
© 2008 Thomson/SouthWestern. All rights reserved.
8–19
Selection Testing: Ability Tests
Cognitive Ability
Tests
Physical Ability
Tests
Psychomotor
Tests
Ability Tests
Work Sample
Tests
Aptitude and
Achievement
Situational
Judgment Tests
Assessment
Centers
© 2008 Thomson/SouthWestern. All rights reserved.
8–20
Other Tests
• Personality Tests
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)
Myers-Briggs
“Fakability” and personality tests
• Honest and Integrity Tests
Socially desirable responses
False positives
Polygraph tests (“lie detector”)
Pre-employment
testing is prohibited (in most
instances) by the Employee Polygraph Protection
© 2008 Act.
Thomson/SouthWestern. All rights reserved.
8–21
FIGURE 8-7
Big Five
Personality
Characteristics
© 2008 Thomson/SouthWestern. All rights reserved.
8–22
Selection
Interviewing
Issues
Face
Validity
Interview
Reliability and
Validity
Intra-rater
Reliability
© 2008 Thomson/SouthWestern. All rights reserved.
Inter-rater
Reliability
8–23
Structured Interviews
Structured
Interviews
Biographical
Interview
Behavioral
Interview
© 2008 Thomson/SouthWestern. All rights reserved.
Competency
Interview
Situational
Interview
8–24
Structured Interviews (cont’d)
Benefits of Structured Interviews
Obtain consistent
information needed
for selection
decision
Are more reliable and
valid than other
interview formats
© 2008 Thomson/SouthWestern. All rights reserved.
Meet federal EEO
guidelines for the
selection process
8–25