The Common Core State
Standards for
Mathematics
William H. Schmidt
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics
(CCSSM):
Are world-class
Can potentially elevate the academic
performance of America’s students
Most states have a long way to go:
some less
Teachers and parents overwhelmingly
support them
But we must convince students as well
Center for the Study of Curriculum
Top-Achieving Countries Composite Mathematics
Standards
Center for the Study of Curriculum
State Level Agreement
Center for the Study of Curriculum
The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics
Center for the Study of Curriculum
Possible Standard Based on Composite Profile of the
Top-Achieving Countries
Center for the Study of Curriculum
Number of Topics Intended at Each Grade for Various
Standards
Center for the Study of Curriculum
CCSSM Congruence and NAEP Mathematics
Performance
States with past mathematics
standards that were more
similar to the CCSSM had
statistically significantly higher
NAEP 2009 performance.
Center for the Study of Curriculum
How Standards May Affect Student Achievement
Standards
Student
Achievement
Classroom
Instruction
Center for the Study of Curriculum
Standards Relationship to Student Achievement
Is Influenced by . . .
Instructional support materials
produced by state, e.g., teacher guides
Professional development for teachers
sponsored/authorized by state
Assessments and assessment cutpoints that support state’s standards
Center for the Study of Curriculum
CCSSM Congruence and NAEP Mathematics
Performance
The change in the R-square
between a model including only
the congruence measure to one
that adjusted the congruence
measure for the NAEP cut points
yielded a 12% increase.
Center for the Study of Curriculum
Factors Affecting CCSSM Implementation
State assessment definitions
of proficiency
Measure of poverty
Percent of low-income family
students attending public
schools
Center for the Study of Curriculum
Relating State Standards to NAEP 2009 Scores
Model
Estimate
Model Number
Rp
of
squared value States
Congruence Measure
0.04* 0.67 0.00 50
Adjusted for Cut Points
Percent Federal Funding -0.95**
Percent Non-poor White 0.33**
*p < 0.016
**p < .001
Center for the Study of Curriculum
Consistency With the CCSSM
Consistency of state standards
with the CCSSM range from
66% — 83%
The measure of consistency
for the A+ standard is about
90%
Center for the Study of Curriculum
Consistency With the CCSSM
Most Like
CCSS
Alabama
Michigan
California
Minnesota
Florida
Mississippi
Georgia
Oklahoma
Indiana
Washington
Idaho
Utah
North Dakota
Oregon
South Dakota
Tennessee
Colorado
New York
Texas
Delaware
North Carolina
Vermont
Hawaii
Ohio
West Virginia
Alaska
Arkansas
Massachusetts New Mexico
Pennsylvania South Carolina
Least Like
CCSS
Connecticut
Montana
Illinois
Nebraska
Maine
New Hampshire
Maryland
Virginia
Missouri
Wyoming
Arizona
Nevada
Iowa
New Jersey
Kansas
Rhode Island
Kentucky
Wisconsin
Louisiana
Center for the Study of Curriculum
Representative Sample of Teachers in Each
CCSSM-Adopted State
90% have heard of the CCSSM
70% have read them
More than 90% like the idea of
Common Standards
Center for the Study of Curriculum
Teachers Thoughts about CCSSM
After reading sample CCSSM topics for
their grade, ~80% say CCSSM is
“pretty much the same” as their
former standards
If CCSSM places a topic they currently
teach in a different grade only about
¼ would drop it
Center for the Study of Curriculum
Teachers Sense of Preparedness to Teach CCSSM
Topics
Grades 1-5: About ½ feel well
prepared to teach their topics
Grades 6-8: Around 60% feel well
prepared to teach their topics
High School: Around 70% feel well
prepared to teach their topics
Center for the Study of Curriculum
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics
(CCSSM):
Are world-class
Can potentially elevate the academic
performance of America’s students
Most states have a long way to go:
some less
Teachers and parents overwhelmingly
support them
But we must convince students as well
Center for the Study of Curriculum