3
Process Strategy
PowerPoint Slides
by Jeff Heyl
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hal
For Operations Management, 9e by
Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra
© 2010 Pearson Education
3–1
Process Strategy
Principles of process strategy
1. Make choices that fit the situation and that
make sense together, that have a close
strategic fit
2. Individual processes are the building blocks
that eventually create the firm’s whole supply
chain
3. Management must pay particular attention to
the interfaces between processes
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hal
3–2
Process Strategy
There are four basic process decisions
1. Process structure including layout
2. Customer involvement
3. Resource flexibility
4. Capital intensity
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hal
3–3
Process Strategy Decisions
Process Structure
• Customer-contract position
(services)
• Product-process position
(manufacturing)
• Layout
Customer Involvement
• Low involvement
• High involvement
Resource Flexibility
• Specialized
• Enlarged
Capital Intensity
• Low automation
• High automation
Strategy for Change
• Process reengineering
• Process improvement
Figure 3.1 – Major Decisions for
Effective Processes
Effective Process
Design
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hal
3–4
Process Structure in Services
Customer contact is the extent to which the
customer is present, actively involved, and
receives personal attention during the
service process
Face-to-face interaction is sometimes
called a moment of truth or a service
encounter
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hal
3–5
Process Structure in Services
TABLE 3.1
|
|
DIMENSIONS OF CUSTOMER CONTACT IN SERVICE
PROCESSES
Dimension
High Contact
Low Contact
Physical presence
Present
Absent
What is processed
People
Possessions or information
Contact intensity
Active, visible
Passive, out of sight
Personal attention
Personal
Impersonal
Method of delivery
Face-to-face
Regular mail or e-mail
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hal
3–6
Process Structure in Services
The three elements of the customercontact matrix are
1. The degree of customer contact
2. Customization
3. Process characteristics
Process characteristics include
1. Process divergence deals with customization
and the latitude as to how tasks are performed
2. Flow is how customers, objects, or information
are process and can be either line of flexible
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hal
3–7
Service Process Structuring
Less processes divergence and more line flows
Less customer contact and customization
Process
Characteristics
(1)
Flexible flows with
Individual
processes
(2)
Flexible flows with
some dominant
paths, with
some exceptions
to how work
performed
(1)
High interaction with
customers, highly
customized service
(2)
Some interaction with
customers, standard
services with some options
(3)
Low interaction with
customers, standardized
services
Front office
Hybrid office
(3)
Line flows, routine
work same with all
customers
Figure 3.2 – Customer-Contact Matrix for Service Processes
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hal
Back office
3–8
Product-Process Matrix
For manufacturing organization it brings
together
1. Volume
2. Product customization
3. Process characteristics
Process choices include job, batch, line,
and continuous flow processes
Production and inventory strategies
include make-to-order, assemble-to-order,
and make-to-stock
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hal
3–9
Product-Process Matrix
Less customization and higher volume
Less complexity, less divergence, and more line flows
Process
Characteristics
(1)
Customized process,
with flexible and
unique sequence of
tasks
(2)
Disconnected line
flows, moderately
complex work
(1)
(2)
Low-volume
Multiple products with low
products, made to moderate volume
to customer
order
(3)
Few major
products,
higher
volume
(4)
High volume, high
standardization,
commodity
products
Job
process
Small batch
process
Batch processes
(3)
Connected line, highly
repetitive work
(4)
Continuous flows
Figure 3.3 – Product-Process Matrix for Processes
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hal
Large batch
process
Line
process
Continuous
process
3 – 10
Layout
The physical arrangement of human and
capital resources
An operation is a group of resources
performing all or part of one or more
processes
Layout involves three basic steps
1. Gather information
2. Develop a block plan
3. Design a detailed layout
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hal
3 – 11
Layout
Gather information on space requirements,
available space, and closeness factors
Department
Area Needed (ft2)
1. Administration
3,500
2. Social services
2,600
3. Institutions
2,400
4. Accounting
1,600
5. Education
1,500
6. Internal audit
3,400
Total 15,000
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hal
3 – 12
Block Plan
3
6
4
100’
1
2
5
150’
Figure 3.4 – Current Block Plan for the Office of Budget Management
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hal
3 – 13
Closeness Matrix
Closeness Factors
Department
1
2
3
4
5
6
1. Administration
―
3
6
5
6
10
―
8
1
1
―
3
9
―
2
2. Social services
3. Institutions
4. Accounting
5. Education
6. Internal audit
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hal
―
1
―
3 – 14
Requirements
There are two absolute requirements for
the new layout
1. Education should remain where it is
2. Administration should remain where it is
Closeness Factors
Department
1
2
3
4
5
6
1. Administration
―
3
6
5
6
10
―
8
1
1
―
3
9
―
2
2. Social services
3. Institutions
4. Accounting
5. Education
6. Internal audit
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hal
―
1
―
3 – 15
Developing a Block Plan
EXAMPLE 3.1
Develop an acceptable block plan for the Office of Budget
Management that locates departments with the greatest
interaction as close to each other as possible.
SOLUTION
Using closeness ratings of 8 and above, you might plan to
locate departments as follows:
a. Departments 1 and 6
close together
b. Departments 3 and 5
close together
c. Departments 2 and 3
close together
Closeness Factors
Department
1
2
3
4
5
6
1. Administration
―
3
6
5
6
10
―
8
1
1
―
3
9
―
2
2. Social services
3. Institutions
4. Accounting
5. Education
6. Internal audit
―
1
―
Departments 1 and 5 should
remain at their current locations
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hal
3 – 16
Developing a Block Plan
a. Departments 1 and 6 close together
b. Departments 3 and 5 close together
c. Departments 2 and 3 close together
6
2
3
100’
1
4
5
150’
Figure 3.5 – Proposed Block Plan
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hal
3 – 17
The Weighted-Distance Method
The weighted-distance method can be used
to compare alternative block plans when
relative locations are important
Euclidian distance is the straight-line
distance between two possible points
d AB =
( x A − xB ) + ( y A − y B )
2
2
where
dAB
xA
yA
xB
yB
= distance between points A and B
= x-coordinate of point A
= y-coordinate of point A
= x-coordinate of point B
= y-coordinate of point B
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hal
3 – 18
The Weighted-Distance Method
Rectilinear distance measures the distance
between two possible points with a series
of 90-degree turns
d AB = x A − xB + y A − y B
The objective is to minimize the weighteddistance score (wd)
A layout’s wd score is calculated by
summing the products of the proximity
scores and distances between centers
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hal
3 – 19
Application 3.1
What is the distance between (20,10) and (80,60)?
Euclidian Distance
dAB =
(20 – 80)2 + (10 – 60)2
=
Rectilinear Distance
dAB = |20 – 80| + |10 – 60| =
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hal
3 – 20
Application 3.1
What is the distance between (20,10) and (80,60)?
Euclidian Distance
dAB =
(20 – 80)2 + (10 – 60)2
= 78.1
Rectilinear Distance
dAB = |20 – 80| + |10 – 60| = 110
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hal
3 – 21
Calculating the WD Score
EXAMPLE 3.2
How much better is the proposed block than the current block
plan?
SOLUTION
The following table lists pairs of departments that have a
nonzero closeness factor and the rectilinear distances
between departments for both the current plan and the
proposed plan
3
6
4
6
2
3
1
2
5
1
4
5
Current Block Plan
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hal
Proposed Block Plan
3 – 22
Calculating the WD Score
Current Plan
Department
Pair
Closeness
Factor (w)
1, 2
3
1, 3
6
1, 4
5
1, 5
6
1, 6
10
2, 3
8
2, 4
1
2, 5
1
3, 4
3
3, 5
9
4, 5
2
5, 6
1
Distance
(d)
Weighted-Distance
Score (wd)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hal
Proposed Plan
Distance
(d)
Weighted-Distance
Score (wd)
3 – 23
Calculating the WD Score
Current Plan
Department
Pair
Closeness
Factor (w)
Distance
(d)
Proposed Plan
Weighted-Distance
Score (wd)
Distance
(d)
Weighted-Distance
Score (wd)
1, 2
3
1
3
2
6
1, 3
6
1
6
3
18
1, 4
5
3
15
1
5
1, 5
6
2
12
2
12
1, 6
10
2
20
1
10
2, 3
8
2
16
1
8
2, 4
1
2
2
1
1
2, 5
1
1
1
2
2
3, 4
3
2
6
2
6
3, 5
9
3
27
1
9
4, 5
2
1
2
1
2
5, 6
1
2
2
3
3
Total 112
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hal
Total 82
3 – 24
OM Explorer Analysis
Figure 3.6 – Second Proposed Block Plan (Analyzed with Layout Solver)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hal
3 – 25