CHAPTER 9
RECEIVABLES
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
1.
Receivables are normally classified as (1) accounts receivable, (2) notes receivable, or
(3) other receivables.
2.
Dan’s Hardware should use the direct write-off method because it is a small business that has
a relatively small number and volume of accounts receivable.
3.
Contra asset, credit balance
4.
The accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts may be reported at a net amount
of $661,500 ($673,400 – $11,900) in the Current Assets section of the balance sheet. In this
case, the amount of the allowance for doubtful accounts should be shown separately in a note
to the financial statements or in parentheses on the balance sheet. Alternatively, the accounts
receivable may be shown at the gross amount of $673,400 less the amount of the allowance
for doubtful accounts of $11,900, thus yielding net accounts receivable of
$661,500.
5.
(1) The percentage rate used is excessive in relationship to the accounts written off as
uncollectible; hence, the balance in the allowance is excessive.
(2) A substantial volume of old uncollectible accounts is still being carried in the accounts
receivable account.
6.
An estimate based on analysis of receivables provides the most accurate estimate of the
current net realizable value.
7.
a.
b.
8.
The interest will amount to $5,100 ($85,000 × 6%) only if the note is payable one year from
the date it was created. The usual practice is to state the interest rate in terms of an annual
rate, rather than in terms of the period covered by the note.
9.
Debit Accounts Receivable for $243,600
Credit Notes Receivable for $240,000
Credit Interest Revenue for $3,600
10.
Sailfish Company
Notes Receivable
Cash
Accounts Receivable [$240,000 + ($240,000 × 6% × 90/360)]
Interest Revenue
($243,600 × 30/360 × 9% = $1,827).
245,427
243,600
1,827
9-1
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
CHAPTER 9
Receivables
PRACTICE EXERCISES
PE 9–1A
Feb.
May
12 Cash
Bad Debt Expense
Accounts Receivable—Leo Jorgenson
800
2,400
3,200
3 Accounts Receivable—Leo Jorgenson
Bad Debt Expense
2,400
3 Cash
Accounts Receivable—Leo Jorgenson
2,400
2 Cash
Bad Debt Expense
Accounts Receivable—Rachel Elpel
600
1,350
2,400
2,400
PE 9–1B
Oct.
Dec.
1,950
20 Accounts Receivable—Rachel Elpel
Bad Debt Expense
1,350
20 Cash
Accounts Receivable—Rachel Elpel
1,350
12 Cash
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts Receivable—Leo Jorgenson
800
2,400
1,350
1,350
PE 9–2A
Feb.
May
3,200
3 Accounts Receivable—Leo Jorgenson
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
2,400
3 Cash
Accounts Receivable—Leo Jorgenson
2,400
2,400
2,400
PE 9–2B
Oct.
2 Cash
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts Receivable—Rachel Elpel
Dec.
600
1,350
1,950
20 Accounts Receivable—Rachel Elpel
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
1,350
20 Cash
Accounts Receivable—Rachel Elpel
1,350
1,350
1,350
PE 9–3A
a.
$55,500 ($7,400,000 × 0.0075)
Adjusted Balance
b.
c.
Accounts Receivable……………………………………………………
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts ($9,000 + $55,500)……………
Bad Debt Expense………………………………………………………
$685,000
64,500
55,500
Net realizable value ($685,000 – $64,500)…………………………
$620,500
PE 9–3B
a.
b.
$231,500 ($46,300,000 × 0.0050)
Adjusted Balance
c.
Accounts Receivable……………………………………………………
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts ($231,500 – $12,500)…………
Bad Debt Expense………………………………………………………
$3,460,000
219,000
231,500
Net realizable value ($3,460,000 – $219,000)………………………
$3,241,000
PE 9–4A
a.
$41,000 ($50,000 – $9,000)
Adjusted Balance
b.
c.
Accounts Receivable…………………………………………………
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts…………………………………
Bad Debt Expense………………………………………………………
$685,000
50,000
41,000
Net realizable value ($685,000 – $50,000)…………………………
$635,000
PE 9–4B
a.
$257,500 ($245,000 + $12,500)
Adjusted Balance
b.
c.
Accounts Receivable…………………………………………………
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts…………………………………
Bad Debt Expense………………………………………………………
$3,460,000
245,000
257,500
Net realizable value ($3,460,000 – $245,000)……………………
$3,215,000
PE 9–5A
a. The due date for the note is September 6, determined as follows:
August …………………………………………………………….……
September………………………………………………………………
Total………………………………………………………………………
b.
24 days (31 – 7)
6 days
30 days
$210,875 [$210,000 + ($210,000 × 5% × 30/360)]
Sept.
c.
6 Cash
Notes Receivable
Interest Revenue
210,875
210,000
875
PE 9–5B
a.
The due date for the note is August 7, determined as follows:
April……………………………………………………………………
May…………………………………………………………………….
June……………………………………………………………………
July…………………………………………………………………….
August………………………………………………………….………
Total……………………………………………………………………
b.
$462,000 [$450,000 + ($450,000 × 8% × 120/360)]
c.
Aug.
7 Cash
Notes Receivable
Interest Revenue
21 days (30 – 9)
31 days
30 days
31 days
7 days
120 days
462,000
450,000
12,000
PE 9–6A
a.
Accounts Receivable Turnover
Net sales……………………………
Accounts receivable:
Beginning of year………………
End of year………………………
Average accts. receivable…………
Accts. receivable turnover………
b.
Number of Days’ Sales
in Receivables
Net sales………………………………
Average daily sales…………………
Average accts. receivable…………
Number of days’ sales in
receivables…………………………
c.
2014
$2,912,000
2013
$2,958,000
$ 300,000
$ 340,000
$ 320,000
$ 280,000
$ 300,000
$ 290,000
[($300,000 + $340,000) ÷ 2]
[($280,000 + $300,000) ÷ 2]
9.1
10.2
($2,912,000 ÷ $320,000)
($2,958,000 ÷ $290,000)
2014
$2,912,000
$ 7,978.1
2013
$2,958,000
$ 8,104.1
($2,912,000 ÷ 365 days)
($2,958,000 ÷ 365 days)
$ 320,000
$ 290,000
[($300,000 + $340,000) ÷ 2]
[($280,000 + $300,000) ÷ 2]
40.1 days
35.8 days
($320,000 ÷ $7,978.1)
($290,000 ÷ $8,104.1)
The decrease in the accounts receivable turnover from 10.2 to 9.1 and the
increase in the number of days’ sales in receivables from 35.8 days to 40.1
days indicate unfavorable trends in the efficiency of collecting receivables.
PE 9–6B
a.
Accounts Receivable Turnover
Net sales…………………………………
Accounts receivable:
Beginning of year…………………
End of year…………………………
Average accts. receivable……………
Accts. receivable turnover……………
b.
Number of Days’ Sales
in Receivables
Net sales…………………………………
Average daily sales……………………
Average accts. receivable……………
Number of days’ sales in
receivables……………………………
c.
2014
$7,906,000
2013
$6,726,000
$ 600,000
$ 580,000
$ 590,000
$ 540,000
$ 600,000
$ 570,000
[($600,000 + $580,000) ÷ 2]
[($540,000 + $600,000) ÷ 2]
13.4
11.8
($7,906,000 ÷ $590,000)
($6,726,000 ÷ $570,000)
2014
$7,906,000
$ 21,660.3
2013
$6,726,000
$ 18,427.4
($7,906,000 ÷ 365 days)
($6,726,000 ÷ 365 days)
$ 590,000
$ 570,000
[($600,000 + $580,000) ÷ 2]
[($540,000 + $600,000) ÷ 2]
27.2 days
30.9 days
($590,000 ÷ $21,660.3)
($570,000 ÷ $18,427.4)
The increase in the accounts receivable turnover from 11.8 to 13.4 and the
decrease in the number of days’ sales in receivables from 30.9 days to 27.2
days indicate favorable trends in the efficiency of collecting receivables.
EXERCISES
Ex. 9–1
Accounts receivable from the U.S. government are significantly different from
receivables from commercial aircraft carriers such as Delta and United. Thus,
Boeing should report each type of receivable separately. In its filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, Boeing reports the receivables together
on the balance sheet, but discloses each receivable separately in a note to the
financial statements.
Ex. 9–2
a.
MGM Resorts International: 22.6% ($93,760,000 ÷ $415,654,000)
b.
Johnson & Johnson: 3.4% ($340,000,000 ÷ $10,114,000,000)
c.
Casino operations experience greater bad debt risk, since it is difficult to
control the creditworthiness of customers entering the casino. In addition,
individuals who may have adequate creditworthiness could overextend
themselves and lose more than they can afford if they get caught up in the
excitement of gambling. In contrast, Johnson & Johnson’s customers are
primarily other businesses such as grocery store chains.
Ex. 9–3
Jan.
June
Nov.
30 Accounts Receivable—Dr. Cindy Mott
Sales
85,000
30 Cost of Merchandise Sold
Merchandise Inventory
50,000
3 Cash
Bad Debt Expense
Accounts Receivable—Dr. Cindy Mott
85,000
50,000
48,000
37,000
85,000
27 Accounts Receivable—Dr. Cindy Mott
Bad Debt Expense
37,000
27 Cash
Accounts Receivable—Dr. Cindy Mott
37,000
37,000
37,000
Ex. 9–4
Mar.
Aug.
Dec.
19 Accounts Receivable—Midnight Delights Co.
Sales
37,500
19 Cost of Merchandise Sold
Merchandise Inventory
23,000
31 Cash
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts Receivable—Midnight Delights Co.
22,000
15,500
22 Accounts Receivable—Midnight Delights Co.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
15,500
22 Cash
Accounts Receivable—Midnight Delights Co.
15,500
37,500
23,000
37,500
15,500
15,500
Ex. 9–5
a.
b.
Bad Debt Expense
Accounts Receivable—Wil Treadwell
11,750
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts Receivable—Wil Treadwell
11,750
11,750
11,750
Ex. 9–6
a.
b.
$501,000 ($66,800,000 × 0.0075)
$493,000 ($475,000 + $18,000)
c.
d.
$334,000 ($66,800,000 × 0.0050)
$350,000 ($360,000 – $10,000)
Ex. 9–7
Account
Avalanche Auto
Bales Auto
Derby Auto Repair
Lucky’s Auto Repair
Pit Stop Auto
Reliable Auto Repair
Trident Auto
Valley Repair & Tow
Due Date
August 8
October 11
June 23
September 2
September 19
July 15
August 24
May 17
Number of Days Past Due
84 (23 + 30 + 31)
20 (31 – 11)
130 (7 + 31 + 31 + 30 + 31)
59 (28 + 31)
42 (11 + 31)
108 (16 + 31 + 30 + 31)
68 (7 + 30 + 31)
167 (14 + 30 + 31 + 31 + 30 + 31)
Ex. 9–8
a.
Customer
Color World Industries
Hawks Company
Osler Inc.
Sather Sales Company
Wisdom Company
Number of Days Past Due
Due Date
March 13
June 29
July 8
September 6
August 25
171 days (18 + 30 + 31 + 30 + 31 + 31)
63 days (1 + 31 + 31)
54 days (23 + 31)
Not past due
6 days (31 – 25)
b.
Aging of Receivables Schedule
August 31
Days Past Due
Not Past
Customer
Balance
Allied Industries Inc.
3,000
Archer Company
4,500
Zussman Company
5,000
Subtotals
Color World Industries
750,000
Due
1–30
31–60
61–90
90
3,000
4,500
5,000
480,000
160,000
75,000
28,000
33,000
7,000
33,000
Hawks Company
15,000
Osler Inc.
Sather Sales Company
Wisdom Company
21,000
8,000
6,500
8,000
833,500
488,000
Totals
Over
15,000
21,000
6,500
166,500
96,000
43,000
40,000
Ex. 9–9
Days Past Due
Not Past
Balance
Total receivables
833,500
Percentage uncollectible
Due
Over
1–30
488,000
2%
31–60
166,500
6%
96,000
12%
61–90
43,000
30%
90
40,000
75%
Allowance for doubtful
accounts
74,170
9,760
9,990
11,520
12,900
30,000
Ex. 9–10
Aug.
31 Bad Debt Expense
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Uncollectible accounts estimate
($74,170 – $6,350).
67,820
67,820
Ex. 9–11
Estimated
Uncollectible Accounts
Age Interval
Not past due
1–30 days past due
31–60 days past due
61–90 days past due
91–180 days past due
Over 180 days past due
Total
Balance
$ 740,000
390,000
85,000
28,000
42,000
15,000
$1,300,000
Percent
0.5%
2%
4%
14%
32%
80%
Amount
$ 3,700
7,800
3,400
3,920
13,440
12,000
$44,260
Ex. 9–12
2014
Dec.
31 Bad Debt Expense
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Uncollectible accounts estimate
($44,260 + $3,375).
47,635
47,635
Ex. 9–13
a.
Apr.
May
July
Dec.
13 Bad Debt Expense
Accounts Receivable—Dean Sheppard
8,450
15 Cash
Bad Debt Expense
Accounts Receivable—Dan Pyle
500
6,600
27 Accounts Receivable—Dean Sheppard
Bad Debt Expense
8,450
27 Cash
Accounts Receivable—Dean Sheppard
8,450
31 Bad Debt Expense
Accounts Receivable—Paul Chapman
Accounts Receivable—Duane DeRosa
Accounts Receivable—Teresa Galloway
Accounts Receivable—Ernie Klatt
Accounts Receivable—Marty Richey
13,510
31 No entry
8,450
7,100
8,450
8,450
2,225
3,550
4,770
1,275
1,690
Ex. 9–13 (Concluded)
b.
Apr.
May
July
Dec.
c.
13 Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts Receivable—Dean Sheppard
8,450
15 Cash
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts Receivable—Dan Pyle
500
6,600
27 Accounts Receivable—Dean Sheppard
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
8,450
27 Cash
Accounts Receivable—Dean Sheppard
8,450
31 Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts Receivable—Paul Chapman
Accounts Receivable—Duane DeRosa
Accounts Receivable—Teresa Galloway
Accounts Receivable—Ernie Klatt
Accounts Receivable—Marty Richey
13,510
31 Bad Debt Expense
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Uncollectible accounts estimate
($3,778,000 × 0.75% = $28,335).
28,335
8,450
7,100
8,450
8,450
2,225
3,550
4,770
1,275
1,690
28,335
Bad debt expense under:
Allowance method………………………...………………………………………
Direct write-off method ($8,450 + $6,600 – $8,450 + $13,510)……………
Difference ($28,335 – $20,110)…………………………………………………
Shipway Company’s income would be $8,225 higher under the direct write-off
method than under the allowance method.
$28,335
20,110
$ 8,225
Ex. 9–14
a.
June
Aug.
Oct.
Dec.
8 Bad Debt Expense
Accounts Receivable—Kathy Quantel
8,440
14 Cash
Bad Debt Expense
Accounts Receivable—Rosalie Oakes
3,000
9,500
16 Accounts Receivable—Kathy Quantel
Bad Debt Expense
8,440
16 Cash
Accounts Receivable—Kathy Quantel
8,440
31 Bad Debt Expense
Accounts Receivable—Wade Dolan
Accounts Receivable—Greg Gagne
Accounts Receivable—Amber Kisko
Accounts Receivable—Shannon Poole
Accounts Receivable—Niki Spence
24,955
31 No entry
8,440
12,500
8,440
8,440
4,600
3,600
7,150
2,975
6,630
Ex. 9–14 (Continued)
b.
June
Aug.
Oct.
Dec.
8 Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts Receivable—Kathy Quantel
8,440
14 Cash
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts Receivable—Rosalie Oakes
3,000
9,500
16 Accounts Receivable—Kathy Quantel
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
8,440
16 Cash
Accounts Receivable—Kathy Quantel
8,440
31 Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts Receivable—Wade Dolan
Accounts Receivable—Greg Gagne
Accounts Receivable—Amber Kisko
Accounts Receivable—Shannon Poole
Accounts Receivable—Niki Spence
24,955
31 Bad Debt Expense
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Uncollectible accounts estimate
($47,090 – $1,545).
45,545
8,440
12,500
8,440
8,440
4,600
3,600
7,150
2,975
6,630
45,545
Computations:
Aging Class
(Number of Days
Past Due)
0–30 days
31–60 days
61–90 days
91–120 days
More than 120 days
Total receivables
Receivables
Balance on
December 31
$320,000
110,000
24,000
18,000
43,000
$515,000
Estimated Doubtful
Accounts
Percent
1%
3%
10%
33%
75%
Amount
$ 3,200
3,300
2,400
5,940
32,250
$47,090
Estimated balance of allowance account from aging schedule……………………
Unadjusted credit balance of allowance account*……………………………………
Adjustment…………………………………………………………………………………
* $36,000 – $8,440 – $9,500 + $8,440 – $24,955 = $1,545
$47,090
1,545
$45,545
Ex. 9–14 (Concluded)
c.
Bad debt expense under:
Allowance method…………………………………………………………………
Direct write-off method ($8,440 + $9,500 – $8,440 + $24,955)……………
Difference…………………………………………………………………………
$45,545
34,455
$11,090
Rustic Tables’ income would be $11,090 higher under the direct write-off method
than under the allowance method.
Ex. 9–15
$482,800 [$487,500 + $27,800 – ($3,250,000 × 1%)]
Ex. 9–16
a.
$593,000 [$600,000 + $34,000 – ($4,100,000 × 1%)]
b.
$11,700 ($32,500 – $27,800) + ($41,000 – $34,000)
Ex. 9–17
a.
b.
c.
Bad Debt Expense
Accounts Receivable—Shawn Brooke
Accounts Receivable—Eve Denton
Accounts Receivable—Art Malloy
Accounts Receivable—Cassie Yost
30,000
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts Receivable—Shawn Brooke
Accounts Receivable—Eve Denton
Accounts Receivable—Art Malloy
Accounts Receivable—Cassie Yost
30,000
Bad Debt Expense
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Uncollectible accounts estimate
($5,250,000 × 0.75% = $39,375).
39,375
4,650
5,180
11,050
9,120
4,650
5,180
11,050
9,120
Net income would have been $9,375 higher in 2014 under the direct write-off
method, because bad debt expense would have been $9,375 higher under
the allowance method ($39,375 expense under the allowance method vs.
$30,000 expense under the direct write-off method).
39,375
Ex. 9–18
a.
b.
Bad Debt Expense
Accounts Receivable—Kim Abel
Accounts Receivable—Lee Drake
Accounts Receivable—Jenny Green
Accounts Receivable—Mike Lamb
102,500
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts Receivable—Kim Abel
Accounts Receivable—Lee Drake
Accounts Receivable—Jenny Green
Accounts Receivable—Mike Lamb
102,500
Bad Debt Expense
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Uncollectible accounts estimate
($109,650 + $7,500).
117,150
21,550
33,925
27,565
19,460
21,550
33,925
27,565
19,460
117,150
Computations:
Aging Class
Receivables
(Number of Days
Balance on
Past Due)
December 31
More than 120 days
$ 715,000
310,000
102,000
76,000
97,000
Total receivables
$1,300,000
0–30 days
31–60 days
61–90 days
91–120 days
Estimated Doubtful
Accounts
Percent
1%
2%
15%
30%
60%
Amount
$
7,150
6,200
15,300
22,800
58,200
$109,650
Unadjusted debit balance of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
($102,500 – $95,000)………………………………………………………………………
Estimated balance of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
from aging schedule……………………………………………………………………
Adjustment…………………………………………………………………………………
c.
$
7,500
109,650
$117,150
Net income would have been $14,650 lower in 2014 under the allowance
method, because bad debt expense would have been $14,650 higher under the
allowance method ($117,150 expense under the allowance method versus
$102,500 expense under the direct write-off method).
Ex. 9–19
Due Date
Interest
$1,100
[$55,000 × 0.08 × (90/360)]
May 8
300
[$36,000 × 0.05 × (60/360)]
c.
July 30
390
[$78,000 × 0.04 × (45/360)]
d.
Nov. 3
161
[$13,800 × 0.07 × (60/360)]
e.
Jan. 29
a.
Apr. 22
b.
1,160
[$58,000 × 0.06 × (120/360)]
Ex. 9–20
a.
b.
c.
June 18 (10 + 31 + 30 + 31 + 18)
$153,500 [($150,000 × 7% × 120/360) + $150,000]
(1)
(2)
Notes Receivable
Accounts Rec.—Dry Creek Interior Decorators
150,000
Cash
Notes Receivable
Interest Revenue
153,500
150,000
Ex. 9–21
1.
Sale on account.
2.
Cost of merchandise sold for the sale on account.
3.
A sale return or allowance.
4.
Cost of merchandise returned.
5.
Note received from customer on account.
6.
Note dishonored and charged maturity value of note to customer’s account
receivable.
7.
Payment received from customer for dishonored note plus interest earned
after due date.
150,000
3,500
Ex. 9–22
2013
Dec.
2014
Mar.
16 Notes Receivable
Accounts Receivable—Lake Shore
Clothing & Bags Co.
21,000
21,000
31 Interest Receivable
Interest Revenue
Accrued interest
($21,000 × 0.08 × 15/360 = $70).
70
31 Interest Revenue
Income Summary
70
16 Cash
Notes Receivable
Interest Receivable
Interest Revenue
($21,000 × 0.08 × 75/360).
70
70
21,420
21,000
70
350
Ex. 9–23
July
Nov.
Dec.
12 Notes Receivable
Accounts Receivable—Accolade Co.
240,000
240,000
9 Accounts Receivable—Accolade Co.
Notes Receivable
Interest Revenue
($240,000 × 0.07 × 120/360).
245,600
9 Cash
Accounts Receivable—Accolade Co.
Interest Revenue
($245,600 × 0.09 × 30/360).
247,442
240,000
5,600
245,600
1,842
Ex. 9–24
Apr.
May
June
Aug.
Oct.
18 Notes Receivable
Accounts Receivable—Glenn Cross
60,000
30 Notes Receivable
Accounts Receivable—Rhoni Melville
42,000
18 Accounts Receivable—Glenn Cross
Notes Receivable
Interest Revenue
($60,000 × 7% × 30/360).
60,350
29 Accounts Receivable—Rhoni Melville
Notes Receivable
Interest Revenue
($42,000 × 8% × 60/360).
42,560
16 Cash
Accounts Receivable—Glenn Cross
Interest Revenue
($60,350 × 8% × 90/360).
61,557
22 Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts Receivable—Rhoni Melville
42,560
60,000
42,000
60,000
350
42,000
560
60,350
1,207
42,560
Ex. 9–25
1.
The interest receivable should be reported separately as a current asset. It
should not be deducted from notes receivable.
2.
The allowance for doubtful accounts should be deducted from accounts
receivable.
A corrected partial balance sheet would be as follows:
NAPA VINO COMPANY
Balance Sheet
December 31, 2014
Assets
Current assets:
Cash
Notes receivable
Accounts receivable
Less allowance for doubtful accounts
Interest receivable
$
$1,200,000
11,500
78,500
300,000
1,188,500
4,500
Ex. 9–26
a. and b.
Net sales……………………………
Accounts receivable………………
Average accts. receivable………
Accts. receivable turnover………
Average daily sales………………
Days’ sales in receivables………
c.
Year 1
$5,660,300
$4,978,900
$592,700
$539,450
$486,200
$531,450
[($592,700 + $486,200) ÷ 2]
[($486,200 + $576,700) ÷ 2]
10.5
9.4
($5,660,300 ÷ $539,450)
($4,978,900 ÷ $531,450)
$15,507.7
$13,640.8
($5,660,300 ÷ 365 days)
($4,978,900 ÷ 365 days)
34.8
39.0
($539,450 ÷ $15,507.7)
($531,450 ÷ $13,640.8)
The accounts receivable turnover indicates an increase in the efficiency of collecting
accounts receivable by increasing from 9.4 to 10.5, a favorable trend. The days’ sales
in receivables also indicates an increase in the efficiency of collecting accounts
receivable by decreasing from 39.0 to 34.8, which is a favorable trend. However,
before reaching a final conclusion, the ratios should be compared with industry
averages and similar firms.
Ex. 9–27
a. and b.
Net sales……………………………
Accounts receivable………………
Average accts. receivable………
Accts. receivable turnover………
Average daily sales………………
Days’ sales in receivables………
c.
Year 2
Year 2
Year 1
$10,706,588
$1,265,032
$1,155,185
$10,494,983
$1,045,338
$1,108,567.5
[($1,265,032 + $1,045,338) ÷ 2]
[($1,045,338 + $1,171,797) ÷ 2]
9.3
9.5
($10,706,588 ÷ $1,155,185)
($10,494,983 ÷ $1,108,567.5)
$29,333.1
$28,753.4
($10,706,588 ÷ 365 days)
($10,494,983 ÷ 365 days)
39.4
38.6
($1,155,185 ÷ $29,333.1)
($1,108,567.5 ÷ $28,753.4)
The accounts receivable turnover indicates a decrease in the efficiency of collecting
accounts receivable by decreasing from 9.5 to 9.3, an unfavorable trend. The number
of days’ sales in receivables increased from 38.6 to 39.4 days, also indicating an
unfavorable trend in collections of receivables. These unfavorable trends are
consistent with the economic downturn that occurred worldwide in Year 1 and Year 2.
However, before reaching a final conclusion, both ratios should be compared with
those of past years, industry averages, and similar firms.
Ex. 9–28
a. and b.
Net sales…………………………
Accounts receivable…………
Average accts. receivable……
Accts. receivable turnover……
Average daily sales……………
Days’ sales in receivables……
c.
Year 2
Year 1
$9,613
$ 267
$8,632
$ 249
$ 258
$ 281
[($267 + $249) ÷ 2]
[($249 + $313) ÷ 2]
37.3
30.7
($9,613 ÷ $258)
($8,632 ÷ $281)
$26.3
$23.6
($9,613 ÷ 365 days)
($8,632 ÷ 365 days)
9.8
11.9
($258 ÷ $26.3)
($281 ÷ $23.6)
The accounts receivable turnover indicates an increase in the efficiency of
collecting accounts receivable by increasing from 30.7 to 37.3, a favorable trend.
The days’ sales in receivables indicates an increase in the efficiency of collecting
accounts receivable by decreasing from 11.9 to 9.8, also indicating a favorable
trend. Before reaching a conclusion, however, the ratios should be compared with
industry averages and similar firms.
Ex. 9–29
a.
The average accounts receivable turnover ratios are as follows:
The Limited Brands Inc.: 34.0 [(37.3 + 30.7) ÷ 2]
H.J. Heinz Company: 9.4 [(9.3 + 9.5) ÷ 2]
Note: For computations of the individual ratios, see Ex. 9–27 and Ex. 9–28.
b.
The Limited Brands has the higher average accounts receivable turnover
ratio.
c.
The Limited Brands operates a specialty retail chain of stores that sell directly
to individual consumers. Many of these consumers (retail customers) pay
with MasterCards or VISAs that are recorded as cash sales. In contrast, H.J.
Heinz manufactures processed foods that are sold to food wholesalers,
grocery store chains, and other food distributors that eventually sell Heinz
products to individual consumers. Accordingly, because of the extended
distribution chain, we would expect Heinz to have more accounts receivable
than The Limited Brands. In addition, we would expect Heinz’s business
customers to take a longer period to pay their receivables. Thus, we would
expect Heinz’s average accounts receivable turnover ratio to be lower than
The Limited Brands, as shown in (a).
PROBLEMS
Prob. 9–1A
2.
20—
Feb.
May
Aug.
Oct.
Dec.
8 Cash
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts Receivable—DeCoy Co.
7,200
10,800
18,000
27 Accounts Receivable—Seth Nelsen
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
7,350
27 Cash
Accounts Receivable—Seth Nelsen
7,350
13 Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts Receivable—Kat Tracks Co.
6,400
31 Accounts Receivable—Crawford Co.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
3,880
31 Cash
Accounts Receivable—Crawford Co.
3,880
7,350
7,350
6,400
3,880
3,880
31 Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts Receivable—Newbauer Co.
Accounts Receivable—Bonneville Co.
Accounts Receivable—Crow Distributors
Accounts Receivable—Fiber Optics
23,200
31 Bad Debt Expense
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Uncollectible accounts estimate
($35,700 + $3,170).
38,870
7,190
5,500
9,400
1,110
38,870
Prob. 9–1A (Concluded)
1. and 2.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Feb.
Aug.
Dec.
8
13
31
Dec.
31
10,800
6,400
23,200
Unadjusted Balance
Jan.
May
Oct.
1
27
31
Balance
26,000
7,350
3,880
Dec.
31
Adjusting Entry
38,870
Dec.
31
Adj. Balance
35,700
3,170
Bad Debt Expense
Dec.
31
Adjusting Entry
3.
$1,749,300 ($1,785,000 – $35,700)
4.
a.
b.
c.
38,870
$45,500 ($18,200,000 × 0.0025)
$42,330 ($45,500 – $3,170)
$1,742,670 ($1,785,000 – $42,330)