feedback on april 22

GROUP: DESTINY
FEEDBACK ON GLASSES’ PRESENTATION
After the observing of their group presentation, our group have some comments and
suggestions for them to review and improve. We will mention some of their good points.
First of all, it was a good presentation with the variety of scenarios and interesting
characters especially Ms. Uyen and Mr Quang. The group provided us the information in
a creative ways and successfully attractive the audiences. Via the role play we can
remember the content easily and for a long time. The presentation was short, simple and
understandable
and the way they convey the information was effectively.
However, the amount of information that we received not really much. Since they just
gave the definition of ICT (Information Communication Technology) and then some tools
and applications were introduced such as computers, projectors, televisions, dictionary
and internet. They concluded the presentation by giving some disadvantages of those
tools. They should give us some more tools to try on or to discover a new things for
example Viet call, word cloud, chat bot, etc. The group should design some practical
activities that can help the audiences instead of just asking only one question “ How many
tools that the group has mentioned?” Some parts of their role play were hard to
understand and they used too much Vietnamese in overall. Moreover, the presenters were
divided not equally while Mr. Quang and Ms. Uyen worked too much.
To sum up, they were well-prepared and good time management.


FEEDBACK ON LOTO ’S MICROTEACHING
TEACHING THROUGH DRAWING AND CARTOON
After discussing with our member in our group there are some point that we want to
share with Loto’s group.
In one hand, the way presenters delivered the presentation was absolutely amusing
and interesting. This make audiences easily remembered what they had presented. With the
colorful and attractive pictures, Teacher was able to convey the lesson effectively when
telling a stories about the daily routine. He created a warm and fun atmosphere that motivated

the students in their learn process. It was true that there was a good interaction between the
teacher and the students when they did some activities in class. For example, when the
teacher asked the students to repeat the sentences all the board or the students had to stand up
to share with the whole class about their daily routine. In addition, the learning environment
was not only comfortable but also enjoyable as the student really involved in the activities
when they worked in pairs. The teacher was very kind and enthusiastic, he always provided
help when the students met any problems it can help the teacher build a good rapport with the
students so when the students had any problems they will not hesitate to raise their thought.
In other hand, there were some points that his lesson should be improved. First of all,
the background music should be softer because it can prevent the students from lacking of
concentration and focusing on their study. Instead of stood in the middle of the class and
showed the picture to the whole class or sticked the pictures on the board he can draw the
picture himself or just give the picture to the students and ask them to rearrange it. By this
way, the students can catch up with the lesson more easily. Teacher should create more
group activities for students speak up and call more students to share their talk with the
whole class in order to check they can understand and do what the teacher require them to
do.


In conclusion, it was a good lesson that the teacher had achieved his goals. Since it is
simple short and easy to understand. The only things is the he should pay more attention to the
activities which are designed in his classroom.

FEEDBACK ON FUN LOVER’S MICROTEACHING
After Mr.Vu’s micro-teaching, our group had realized some things about his
classroom, the activities in the class, the teacher and learners’ interaction that we want to
share.
First of all, the amusing and interesting video attracted students in the classroom a lot.
Students could remember easily every single speech in that video. The lesson were showed
by the colorful, lively pictures and stimulating slides. Unfortunately, the words in some slides

were too much and small.
Secondly, there were variety of activities for individual, pair works and group works in the
lesson. Moreover, teacher used notes to call students’ name for answering the questions to
make sure they could understand the lesson. And the topic of lesson was all about translation,
teacher focused to the topic by organizing a lot types of sentences to practice the translation
skill.
Thirdly, the teacher impressed us by having a clear and warm voice as well as good
pronunciation with understandable instruction. Besides, teacher also used motivated
sentences to engage students and create safe atmosphere in the class. The other thing is good
interaction between teacher and students, he went around the class to give useful helps
whenever students needed. Moreover, he rearranged the class into different groups to create
the different and the flexible atmosphere.
However, there are some points that teacher should be considered. First, teacher’s
talking time is longer than students’ ones. Therefore, he should provide more chances for


students to speak up their voices. Sometimes, he spoke a little fast so that students with low
levels might not catch up with the lesson. Next, the time constrain sometimes was not
inappropriate, too much time for explaining theory while there was no time for game or other
activities.
To put it in a nutshell, we really love his class since it was very informative and we
learnt a lot form his lesson. We’d love to join his lesson again if we have a chance. But we
also hope that he will allow us to speak more.