Tải bản đầy đủ (.ppt) (20 trang)

Practice investment management pim3 ch10

Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (685.08 KB, 20 trang )

CHAPTER TEN

MARKET EFFICIENCY

Practical Investment Management
Robert A. Strong


Outline



The Efficient Market Hypothesis
Types of Efficiency
 Degrees of Informational Efficiency
 The Semi-Efficient Market Hypothesis
 Security Prices and Random Walks


South-Western / Thomson Learning © 2004

10 - 2


Outline


Anomalies
The Low PE Effect
 Low-Priced Stocks
 The Small Firm and Neglected Firm Effects


 Market Overreaction
 The January Effect
 The Weekend Effect
 The Persistence of Technical Analysis
 Final Thoughts


South-Western / Thomson Learning © 2004

10 - 3


The Efficient Market Hypothesis
Types of Efficiency


Operational efficiency is a measure of how
well things function in terms of speed of
execution and accuracy.



Informational efficiency is a measure of how
quickly and accurately the market reacts to
new information.



The efficient market hypothesis (EMH) deals
with informational efficiency.


South-Western / Thomson Learning © 2004

10 - 4


The Efficient Market Hypothesis
ASSUMPTIONS:
1. Investors are rational and value securities in a
rational manner.
2. To the extent investors are not rational, they trade
randomly, so irrationalities tend to cancel each other
out.
3. To the extent that investors are not randomly
irrational, they are met in the marketplace by rational
arbitrageurs, who eliminate any remaining irrational
pricing elements.
South-Western / Thomson Learning © 2004

10 - 5


The EMH: Degrees of Informational Efficiency
Weak Form Efficiency




This least restrictive form of the
EMH states that future stock

prices cannot be predicted by
analyzing prices from the past.

In other words, the current stock price fully
reflects any information contained in the
past series of stock prices.

South-Western / Thomson Learning © 2004

10 - 6


The EMH: Degrees of Informational Efficiency

Insert Figure 10-1 here.

South-Western / Thomson Learning © 2004

10 - 7


The EMH: Degrees of Informational Efficiency

Insert Figure 10-2 here.

South-Western / Thomson Learning © 2004

10 - 8



Tests of Weak Form Efficiency
autocorrelation tests

filter rule tests



An autocorrelation test investigates whether
security returns are related through time. A
runs test, for example, measures the
likelihood that a series of two variables is a
random occurrence.



A filter rule is a trading rule regarding the
actions to be taken when shares rise or fall in
value by x%. Filter rules should not
work if markets are weak form efficient.

South-Western / Thomson Learning © 2004

10 - 9


Tests of Weak Form Efficiency

Insert Table 10-3 here.

South-Western / Thomson Learning © 2004


10 - 10


Tests of Weak Form Efficiency

Insert Table 10-4 here.

South-Western / Thomson Learning © 2004

10 - 11


The EMH: Degrees of Informational Efficiency
Semistrong Form Efficiency




Semistrong form efficiency states
that security prices reflect all
publicly available information.

Event studies involving phenomena
occurring at known points in time, such as a
stock split or the announcement of corporate
earnings, are frequently used in tests of the
semistrong form of market efficiency.

South-Western / Thomson Learning © 2004


10 - 12


The EMH: Degrees of Informational Efficiency
Strong Form Efficiency




This most extreme version of the
EMH states that security prices
fully reflect all relevant public and
private information.

Evidence does not support strong form EMH.
Insiders can make a profit on their
knowledge, and people go to jail, get fined,
or get suspended from trading for
doing so.

South-Western / Thomson Learning © 2004

10 - 13


The Efficient Market Hypothesis


The essence of the semi-efficient market

hypothesis is the notion that some stocks
are priced more efficiently than others. This
idea is sometimes used in support of the
thesis that the market has several tiers.


The random walk idea states that
news arrives randomly, not that
stock prices move randomly.

South-Western / Thomson Learning © 2004

10 - 14


Anomalies


The low PE effect : Some evidence indicates
that low PE stocks outperform higher PE
stocks of similar risk.



Low-priced stocks : Many people believe that
the price of every stock has an optimum
trading range.




The small firm effect : Small firms seem to
provide superior risk-adjusted returns.

South-Western / Thomson Learning © 2004

10 - 15


Anomalies


The neglected firm effect : Neglected firms
seem to offer superior returns with
surprising regularity.



Market Overreaction : It is observed that
the market tends to overreact to extreme
news. So, systematic price reversals can
sometimes be predicted.



The January effect : In January, stock returns
are inexplicably high, and small firms’ stocks
do better than large firms’.

South-Western / Thomson Learning © 2004


10 - 16


Anomalies


The weekend effect : It is observed that
security price changes tend to be negative on
Mondays and positive on the other days of
the week, with Friday being the best of all.



The persistence of technical analysis : If the
EMH is true, technical analysis should be
useless. Each year however, an immense
amount of literature based in varying degrees
on the subject is printed.

South-Western / Thomson Learning © 2004

10 - 17


Anomalies

Final thoughts
From the individual investor’s perspective, the
US capital markets are informationally and
operationally quite efficient. Still, much is not

yet known about asset pricing, resulting in a
fair, but complicated financial battleground.

South-Western / Thomson Learning © 2004

10 - 18


Review



The Efficient Market Hypothesis
Types of Efficiency
 Degrees of Informational Efficiency
 The Semi-Efficient Market Hypothesis
 Security Prices and Random Walks


South-Western / Thomson Learning © 2004

10 - 19


Review


Anomalies
The Low PE Effect
 Low-Priced Stocks

 The Small Firm and Neglected Firm Effects
 Market Overreaction
 The January Effect
 The Weekend Effect
 The Persistence of Technical Analysis
 Final Thoughts


South-Western / Thomson Learning © 2004

10 - 20



×