Jfc
2
nakbrai: aiggPKf
BULLETINS^
OF
AMERICAN
PALEONTOLOGY
(Founded 1895)
54
Vol.
242
No.
NOTES ON SIPHOCYPRAEA
By
Axel
A.
Olsson
and
Richard
E.
Petit
1968
Paleontological Research Institution
Ithaca,
New
York, 14850, U.S.A.
- -•
i
PALEONTOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTION
1967-1968
President
Vice-President
Kenneth
E.
William
B.
Heroy
S.
Harris
Rebecca
Secretary-Treasurer
Caster
Katherine V. W. Palmer
Director
Armand L. Adams
Kenneth E. Caster
Counsel
Representative
AAAS Council
Trustees
Katherine V. W. Palmer (Life)
William B. Heroy (1963-1968)
Harris (Life)
Axel A. Olsson (Life)
Hans G. Kugler (1963-1969)
Sass (1965-1971)
W. Storrs Cole (1964-1970)
Kenneth E. Caster (1966-1972)
Donald W. Fisher (1967-1973)
Rebecca S.
Daniel B.
BULLETINS OF AMERICAN PALEONTOLOGY
and
PALAEONTOGRAPHICA AMERICANA
Katherine V. W. Palmer,
Mrs. Fay
Editor
Briggs, Secretary
Advisory Board
Hans Kugler
Glenn Marks
Kenneth E. Caster
A. Myra Keen
Jay
Axel A. Olsson
Complete
titles
and price
list
of separate available numbers
may be had on
application.
For reprint, Vols. 1-23, Bulletins of American Paleontology see
Kraus Reprint Corp., 16 East 46th St., New York, N. Y., 10017 U.S.A.
For
tion,
reprint, vol.
111 Fifth Ave.,
Subscription
I,
Palaeontographica Americana see Johnson Reprint Corpora-
New
may be
York, N. Y. 10003 U.S.A.
entered at any time by volume or year, with average price
Numbers
of $16.00 per volume for Bulletins.
voiced per issue.
income
Purchases in
U.SA.
of Palaeontographica Americana in-
for professional purposes are deductible
tax.
For
sale
by
Paleontological Research Institution
109 Dearborn Place
New York 14850
U.S.A.
Ithaca,
from
BULLETINS
OF
AMERICAN PALEONTOLOGY
(Founded 1895)
54
Vol.
No.
242
NOTES ON SIPHOCYPRAEA
By
Axel
A.
Olsson
and
Richard
E.
Petit
June 25, 1968
Paleontological Research
Ithaca,
New York
Institution
14850, U.S.A.
Library of Congress Catalog Card
Number: GS 68-133
Printed in the United States of America
NOTES ON SIPHOCYPRAEA
Axel
A.
Olsson and Richard
1
Petit 2
E.
INTRODUCTION
In 1932, Schilder referred the so-called
Linne)
Many
1887.
Mouse Cypraea (Cypraea mus
of the southern Caribbean to the genus Siphocypraea Heilprin,
like the senior author,
G. B. Sowerby
I
3
,
a
who have
collected Cypraea henekeni
near relative of C. inns from the Miocene beds of Santo
Domingo and many
other places in the Caribbean region, even as far
south as Ecuador, the reason for this startling generic assignment was not
at
The
apparent.
first
type
of Siphocypraea,
species
S.
problematica
Heilprin, 1887, of the Caloosahatchee marls of south Florida, was generally
regarded as the only species of the genus, an aberrant form
fauna with
many
In the Bulla stage,
5".
problematica was
known
crater-like pit or depression over the apex,
the spire
is
in a special
other singular, endemic genera and species of mollusks.
elevated and pointed.
important and from
it
have a deep, circular or
to
whereas
in
most other Cypraea-.
Dall, 1890, considered this feature very
he derived the comma-shaped or
spiral apical sulcus
so characteristic of S. problematica as the result of rotation of the posterior
end of the outer
lip
around
Soon afterwards, the Bulla stage of Cypraea
it.
carolinensis Conrad, 1841, of the
Duplin Marl became known,
also with a
low, sunken apical area but which with growth did not produce a spiral
or curved posterior canal.
Meanwhile, Julia Gardner (1948), not under-
standing the significance of the depressed apex of the juvenile Cypraea
" Akleistostoma"
proposed the generic term
carolinensis,
species as type; a wholly unnecessary term as
A
few years ago,
as the richly fossiliferous
marls were penetrated along
molluscan fauna came
many
to light,
and
with the Duplin
in previous articles.
beds below the Caloosahatchee
canals and
a
shown
in
bewildering
pits,
a
somewhat older
series of
specimens of
Siphocypraea in countless numbers could be collected on the canal banks.
Those individuals showed complete intergrading forms between C.
ensis with a simple notch to others with a
ing
S.
problematica.
It
was evident
at
carolin-
curved or spiral one approach-
once that C. carolinensis and
S.
problematica are species of the same direct evolutionary lineage.
Following the formation of the inrolled
ceases,
1
2
3
and
is
lip,
growth
in size
by coiling
replaced by a general enamelling of the surface by the mantle
Research Associate,
Research Associate, Smithsonian Institution;
Paleontological Research Institution and of the Academy of Natural Science of
Philadephia.
Research Associate, Paleontological Resarch Institution.
Originally inadvertently spelled henikeri, named for Colonel Heneken.
Honorary
Bulletin 242
280
show extreme
Several species of Cypraea
Jobes.
common
This
small to large.
Cypraea could go into retirement, reabsorb
stage,
and
growing again.
start
or wholly disproved.
There
variation in size
its
lip reverting
to
the Bulla
This legend has neither been confirmed
of fossil Cypraeas in the
a great scarcity
is
Bulla stage, perhaps to be explained in that the immature shell
and hence would be destroyed during
growth forms of
These specimens,
as
well
Colombia, give incentive
as
S.
when
mus from
others
is
thin
fossilization.
This study began a short while back
a fine series of
from
condition led to the belief that a small
a
the junior author received
correspondent 4 in Venezuela.
collected
by
the
senior author
in
review of both Muracypraea and
to a general
Siphocypraea lineages, the two most important groups of Cypraeas in the
American
Tertiary.
AND
LINEAGE OF SIPHOCYPRAEA HENEKENI
MURACYPRAEA WOODRING,
MUS.
S.
This lineage
the older, appeared at least as early as the lower Mio-
is
cene (Woodring, 1959,
194), and has continued through to the Recent,
p.
represented in the southern Caribbean by
Miocene
species
S.
is
where
it
displays
different localities
Ingram."'
The
and synonymy
and
region
Ecuador and possibly
also
to Peru.
in
It is
considerable
to
the
most
I,
1850),
principal
described
be widely distributed throughout
eastern
Pacific
common
variation
have been described
The
first
nuts (Linne).
in
of which
as separate
region
south
to
middle Miocene beds
many forms from
especially by
species,
henekeni complex has been reviewed by Woodring, 1959,
S.
In the eastern Pacific region, the last representative
listed.
of Muracypraea
S.
henekeni (G. B. Sowerby
from Santo Domingo but now known
the Caribbean
1957
known
is
S.
cayapa (Pilsbry and Olsson, 1941) from the
Jama Formation, Ecuador of Pliocene
age.
As
also noted
by Woodring,
1957, Muracypraea reached the western Pacific, and Martin (1891-1922),
in his large
his
monograph of
the
Miocene of
Java, illustrated specimens of
Cypraea murisimilis (plates 26,27) so similar
could be considered
as the
4
Mrs. Jesse B. Jackson,
5
Between 1939-47,
same
species.
It
seems
to S.
benekeni that they
likely that
Muracypraea
Jr.
W. M.
Ingram worked on Cypraea,
visited
many musuems, and
indiscriminately described a large number of fossil forms without knowledge of
variation or geologic occurrence.
Often no acknowledgment was made to the
geologist who may have laboriously collected the specimens.
Such naming is a
habit which adds nothing but a clutter of useless names.
Siphocypraea: Olsson and Petit
281
arose in Oligocene time, probably in the Tethyan Pacific, and
trated into the Caribbean in early Miocene,
managed
where
it
pene-
first
greatly flourished
and
to survive to the present time in a limited area.
Siphocypraea (Muracypraea) mus (Linne)
Cypraea mus Linne, 1758, Systema Naturae, Ed.
Plate 18,
10.
p.
figs.
3-3e
721 (Carthagena, Gulf
of Maracaibo).
Siphocypraea (Akleistostoma) mus (Linne), Coomans, 1963, Studies on Fauna
of Curacao and other Caribbean Islands, vol. XV, No. 68, pp. 52-63. pi. I a-b.
A
series of
growth forms of
S.
mus from
adult was received by the junior author
and some are
illustrated
on Plate
from
A
18.
the small Bulla stage to the
a correspondent in Venezuela,
minor paper on the growth forms
mus based on Colombian specimens was published by Ingram, 1945
of S.
An
but adds nothing of significance and treats mainly of changes in color.
important paper on
presents
ture
mus
S.
is
that of
much new information
ern coast of South America
eastern
A
Colombia on the west
specimen of
is
The record
The town of Turbo is
Museum.
the
A
Gulf of Atrato,
gulf
the
1963 and
thorough review of the
as well as a
litera-
and
the
is
The protoconch
general
is
brown
to
about
in the
of this species along the north-
from about Rio Hacha
in
north-
Margarita in eastern Venezuela.
Isla
collection of
the United States National
considered dubious, and
a large river
emptying
adjacent shores
top side of a Nat/ca,
The nucleus
limited
we have
not accepted
situated on the banks of the Rio Atrato
more unlikely place
pimples occur which
The range
is
mus, collected by E. Daniel (Dec. 1932) supposedly
S.
Turbo, Colombia,
:>f
in
and the many names and generic combinations which authors have
applied to this unusual species.
at
Coomans which appeared
are
a
at the
it.
head
heavy load of sediment into
lined
with
mangrove
swamps.
for a Cypraea could hardly be imagined.
or nucleus of S.
its
may
mus
is
large,
resembling that of the
surface glazed over with callus but faint trace of
indicate an original, sinusigeroid embryonic shell.
encircled by a faint line
marking
its
termination although a
color continues for another turn then changes to the lighter
shade of the final whorl.
Cordon, a locality referred to by Ingram and again by Coomans is situated on
northwest coast of the La Goajira Peninsula in northeastern Colombia.
Coomans showed this locality on his map as being on the Paraguana Peninsula
in Venezuela.
The shells from El Cordon were collected by J. A. Nomland, a
geologist for the Richmond Petroleum Company which carried on large scale
This locality is shown on
exploration in coastal Colombia during the 1920 ths.
the American Geographical Society map, Barranquilla sheet, 1,000, 000, as Cardon
The
de los Remedios and is situated about 80 kilometers east of Rio Hacha.
region is arid, covered with tall cactus (several large species of cactus commonly
known as Cardon).
6 El
the
Bulletin 242
282
Specimen B
is
mm,
31
3d)
(fig.
is still
over the apex,
is
it
in the Bulla stage; the length of its shell
elevated and rounded, rising from
C
specimen
inner edge
stripes
1
The
to 2
mm
end of the
posterior
above the apical
In
its
sharp and the cross ribs on the base show mainly as color
is still
side, there are
no
mm.
30
In specimen
height along the apical axis
is
formation of the outer
well advanced,
lip is
its
its
mm,
32.4
is
D
(fig.
is
apical depression
a continuous line of
is
reduced to a smal-
ler size covered with callus concealing the spire; length of shell
over the apex,
is
it
mm.
35.6
The
its
3b), the
inner edge inrolled and
thickened, and strongly cross-ribbed, while there
small denticles on the body side;
few
denticles, except for a
small ones over the columellar section; length of shell
mm, and
lip is
crater.
3e), the formation of the inrolled lip has begun, but
(fig.
on the inner or body
;
mm.
30
is
38.9
deposition of a surface callus
has hardly begun and the juvenile pattern of zigzags remains.
These observations indicate
that the principal
growth
in size
is
com-
pleted in the Bulla stage by secretions along the edge of the simple lip
and
size
and
in coiling;
of size
is
adhered
and weight
is
as far as these
As
to.
sides.
a fairly
uniform pattern
achieved by secondary deposits of enamel, along with a
change of color pattern.
dorsum and
specimens go,
the shell grows to maturity, further growth in
It is
The mantle secretion is thinly spread over
much heavier over the posterior end leading to
formation of the posterior
lip
the
the
protuberances and the formation of the
canal notch.
S.
mus shows
considerable variations in
pattern and in the adult, no
nile
form the pattern
between lighter
a
and
sides,
of zigzags
marked change
whole
and
is
alike.
and
In the juve-
brown
design maintained through the Bulla stage and
for a time after the lip has fully formed.
overlays the
intensity of color
consists of narrow, close-set, zigzag stripes of
areas,
gerontic stage, a
the
two specimens are exactly
In the mature adult and into the
takes place and a general glaze or
surface, thinnest over the
enamel
dorsum, heavier on the base
as a filling in of the apical depression.
The
juvenile pattern
covered over, and one of irregular spots and flecks appear.
In general the adult marking
fawn brown between
is a
confused blending of large spots of pale
lighter areas, the spots
sometimes joining into radial
The dorsum mantle line is white or light in color,
usually with an irregular blotch of dark brown at its end over the apical
depression. The surface of the dorsum may be evenly rounded or domed,
rows along the
flanks.
SlPHOCYPRAEA
smooth, or
it
may
OLSSON AND PETIT
:
283
bear two conspicuous nodes or humps, one on each side
of the mantle line
These dorsal humps have been
the posterior end.
at
considered deformities or abnormalities by some writers, but they represent
significant
morphological features and indicate relationship with the
henekeni forms of the Miocene.
was
S.
is
the
member
surviving
last,
S.
of
Muracypraea.
LINEAGE OF SlPHOCYPRAEA PROBLEMATICA HEILPRIN,
SlPHOCYPRAEA SENSU STR1CTO
This lineage appears to be younger than Muracypraea, the best
species (S. problematica Heilprin)
distributed
is
formations from the Carolinas to Florida.
S.
The
in
known
earliest
known
Neogene
the upper
species
is
chilona (Dall) 1900, from the lower Miocene Chipola beds of Florida,
Dut
juvenile stage with depressed apex
its
(Olsson and
a longitudinal section
genus attained
is
full
series of intergrading
became
development
extinct at the close of Caloosahatchee time,
been found in the overlying Unit
A
basis of
The
6)
in a
former paper.
in our
on the
pi. 83, fig.
upper Neogene
in the
forms discussed
inferred only
is
1964,
Petit,
sub-
bewildering
The subgenus
and no specimens have
to date.
In the typical and most advanced species (S. problematica Heilprin
and
and
tran si toria Olsson
S.
sulcus
developed
is
Petit,
1964), the comma-shaped, posterior
The formation
to the extreme.
for this curious feature
:an be seen in Plate 18, figure 2 which represents a partial longitudinal
The
cut through the aperture to the dorsum.
shell is seen inside the heavily
wall of the dorsum.
as
due to two
through
all
as in S.
mus
The formation
factors.
First,
stages of the
or
S.
thin-walled Bulla
of the spiral sulcus can be clearly seen
the retention of a deep, apical depression
group which does not become
filled
with callus
henekeni; secondly, followed by the elevation and thick-
ening of the posterior end of the outer
comes
to
sulcus
on the body whorl
(fig. 2a,
small,
thickened wall of the base and the thinner
overhang the apical hollow;
lip
at
side thickens
forcing
it
to rotate so its
end
the same time, the edge of the
and
raises into
2b) to conform in height with the outer
a calloused wall
lip.
FLUORESCENT PATTERN
A
from
a
beautiful fluorescent pattern can often be produced on Siphocypraea
few
localities,
and a
series
is
illustrated in figure
1.
The
juvenile
Bulletin 242
284
pattern
is
formed by zigzag bands, replaced or overlain
Long-wave
one of small spots.
and the fluorescent pattern can be photographed
units give the best results
using a very fast film and a special yellow
W
must be used
ratten)
camera.
by
in the adult
lamps of 3200-4000 angstrom
ultraviolet
filter
over the lense (No.
to eliminate all ultraviolet light
done
Preferably, the photography should be
8,
K.
2.
from entering the
in a
darkened room.
GENERAL CONCLUSIONS
Siphocypraea sens//
and Muracypraea are members of the same
str'icto
generic group and represent two lineages which arose probably in Oligocene
time and became fully differentiated in the Miocene.
the widest
the
as
known
distribution
and
in
its
Miocene of the Caribbean region and
Ecuador and Peru
indistinguishable
it
;
is
from the
form
typical
Muracypraea has
is
found throughout
in the Eastern Pacific as far south
known from the Miocene of Java in forms
Caribbean.
It may well be of Tethyan origin
also
with a distribution which encircled the earth.
oblong, squatty shape and in
its
typical
Muracypraea has usually an
form
humps
carries two, dorsal
bordering a shallow depression over the concealed apex resembling the
enlarged eyebrows of a mouse, hence the name.
Siphocypraea
is
s.
probably endemic
Pinecrest beds
s.
is
a special development
to the
from the same stock and
Miocene of southeastern United
In the
States.
(Duplin) of south Florida, the group proliferated
to
an
astonishing degree and gave rise to a maze of variable, intergrading forms,
but the subgenus became fully stablized
S. problen/atica, its
at
most advanced
species.
in
the Caloosahatchee marls in
The subgenus became
extinct
the close of Caloosahatchee time.
SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY
Coomans, H.
E.
Systematics and distribution of Siphocypraea mus and Propustularia
wrinamensis. Studies on the Fauna of Curacao and other Caribbean Islands,
vol. XV, No. 68, pp. 51-71, pi. 1.
1963.
Conrad, T. A.
1841.
Appendix
to:
Observations on the Secondary and Tertiary formations
of the southern Atlantic States by
ser., vol. 41, pp. 344-348, pi. 2.
James T. Hodge.
Amer. Jour.
Sci..
1st
Siphocypraea: Olsson and Petit
Dall,
W.
285
H.
1890-1903.
Tertiary fauna of Florida
delphia. Trans., vol. 3, 6 pts. (1890, pt.
.
.
1,
Wagner Free Inst. Sci. Philapp. 1-200, pis. 1-12; 1900, pt.
pp. 949-1217, pis. 37-47)
5,
Gardner,
.
J.
1948.
Mollusca from the Miocene and lower Pliocene of Virginia and North
Carolina.
Part 2.
Scaphopoda and Gastropoda. U. S. Geol. Sur., Prof.
Paper 199-B, pp. 177-310, pis. 24-38.
Heilprin, Angelo
Explorations on the west coast of Florida and in the Okeechobee
1887.
Wilderness.
Wagner Free Inst. Sci. Philadelphia, Trans., vol. 1, vi, 134
pp., 19 pis.; reprinted 1966, Palaeont. Amer., vol. IV. No. 33, pp. 359-506,
pis. 54-74.
Ingram, W. M.
1946.
A contribution on the development of the Cypraea
Nautilus, vol. 59, pp. 113-115.
1947.
Fossil
Amer.
Bull.
and Recent Cypraeidae
Paleont., vol. 31, No.
mus Linnaeus.
of the Western regions of the Americas.
120, pp. 1-82, pis. 1, 2.
Martin, K.
1891-1922.
Die Fossilien von Java.
Bd. 1, pp. 1-538, 63 pis.
Geol. Reich- Mus. Leiden Samml.,
n.s.,
Olsson, A. A.
1964.
Neogene mollusks from northwestern Ecuador.
Institution,
256
Paleont.
Research
pp., 38 pis.
Olsson, A. A., and Petit, R. E.
1964.
Some Neogene mollusks from Florida and
Paleont., vol. 47,
Pilsbry, H. A.,
No. 217, pp. 556-561,
pi.
Bull.
Amer.
and Olsson, A. A.
A
Pliocene fauna from ivestern Ecuador.
phia, Proc, vol. 93, pp. 1-79, pis. 1-19.
1941.
the Carolinas.
83.
Acad. Nat.
Sci.,
Philadel-
Schilder, F. A.
1932.
Woodring, W.
Fossilium Catalogus.
I,
Animalia.
Pars 55.
Cypraeacea, 276 pp.
P.
Aluracypraea,
1957.
88-90.
a
new subgenus
of Cypraea.
Nautilus, vol. 70,
pp.
Geology and paleontology of Canal Zone and adjoining parts of
Panama. U. S. Geol. Sur., Prof. Paper 306-B, pp. 143-239, pis. 24-38.
1959.
PLATES
Bulletin 242
288
Explanation of Plate
18
Page
Figure
1-lc.
Siphocypraea (Siphocypraea) transitoria Olsson and Petit
281
Fluorescent patterns.
1.
2-2b.
Siphocypraea (Siphocypraea) transitoria Olsson and Petit
2.
2c-2d.
la.
Adult, dorsal pattern, length 59 mm; No. 27619 PRI.
lb Juvenile pattern, length
Juvenile pattern, length 48.5 mm.
lc. Adult, ventral pattern, length
51.3 mm; No. 27620 PRI.
Kissimmee, Osceola County, Fla.; No. 27621 PRI.
48.3 mm.
Longitudinal section through aperture showing apical sulcus and
Brighton, Highlands County,
inner Bulla stage, length 49 mm.
Fla.; No. 27622 PRI.
2a. Showing elevated callus on body side
2b. Apical view of
of canal, length 38 mm; No. 27623 PRI.
same specimen. Kissimmee, Fla.
Siphocypraea (Siphocypraea) problematica Heilprin
2c.
281
with newly inrolled lip, length 45mm.
end of lip high, length 40.7 mm.
aker rock pit, west of La Belle, Hendry County, Fla.
Young
stage,
3-3e.
281
shell
thin, posterior
2d. Bulla
Whit-
Siphocypraea (Muracypraea) mus (Linne)
3.
279
Adult, dorsal and basal view, length 49.4 mm; No. 27624
PRI.
Young adult still retaining juvenile pattern, length
3b.
38.9 mm; No. 27625 PRI.
3c, 3d. Bulla stage, apical and ventral aspects,
length 30.8 mm; No. 27626 PRI.
3e. Juvenile
3a.
form with newly inrolled lip, no denticles on body side of apertur, length 32.4 mm; No. 27627 PRI.
Ski Beach, Judibana,
Venezuela.
4.
Siphocypraea (Muracypraea) henekeni (Sowerby)
show nodes on dorsum, length 57.3 mm. Middle Miocene,
Gurabo Formation, Rio Gurabo, Gurabo Adentro, Santo Dom-
Adult
to
ingo.
278
Bull. Amer. Paleont., Vol. 54
Plate
18
INDEX
Note: Light face figures refer to page number.
refer to the plate
number.
279, 281
Akleistostoma
Caloosahatchee marls
I)
Dall,
W.
H.
Ecuador
El
Cordon
Bold face figures
XL.
(No. 184).
996
pp., 1 pis
Type and Figured Specimens
XLI.
XLII.
XLIII.
(Nos. 185-192).
381 pp., 35 pis
Australian Carpoid Echinoderms, Yap forams, Shell Bluff,
Ga. forams. Newcomb mollusks, Wisconsin mollusk faunas,
Camerina, Va. forams, Corry Sandstone.
16.00
673 pp., 48 pis
Venezuelan Cenozoic gastropods.
(Nos. 194-198).
427 pp., 29 pis
Ordovician stromatoporoids, Indo-Pacific camerinids, Missis-
16.00
(No. 193).
sippian forams,
XLIV.
XLV.
XLVI.
XLVII.
16.00
P.R.I.
Cuban
16.00
rudists.
(Nos. 199-203).
365 pp., 68 pis
Puerto Rican, Antarctic, New Zealand forams, Lepidocyclina,
Eumalacostraca.
16.00
(No. 204).
16.00
(Nos. 205-211).
419 pp., 70 pis
Large Foraminifera, Texas Cretaceous crustacean, Antarctic
Devonian terebratuloid, Osgood and Paleocene Foraminifera, Recent molluscan types.
16.00
584 pp., 83 pis
Eocene and Devonian Foraminifera, Venezuelan fossil
scaphopods and polychaetes, Alaskan Jurassic ammonites,
16.00
564 pp., 63 pis
Venezuela Cenozoic pelecypods
(Nos. 212-217).
Neogene mollusks.
XLVIII.
XLIX.
(No. 218).
1058 pp., 5 pis
Catalogue of the Paleocene and Eocene Mollusca of the
Southern and Eastern United States.
(Nos. 219-224).
671 pp., 83 pis
Peneroplid and Australian forams, North American carpoids,
South Dakota palynology, Venezuelan Miocene mollusks,
18.00
16.00
Voluta.
518 pp., 42 pis
Venezuela and Florida cirripeds, Antarctic forams, Linnaean
Olives, Camerina, Ordovician conodonts, Niagaran forams.
16.00
420 pp., 10 pis
Antarctic bivalves, Bivalvia catalogue.
16.00
L.
(Nos. 225-230).
LI.
(Nos. 231-232).
LII.
(Nos. 233, 236).
387 pp., 43 pis
Zealand forams, Stromatoporoidea, Indo-Pacific,
cene-Pliocene California forams.
New
16.00
Mio-
LIIL
(Nos. 237-238).
488 pp., 45 pis
Venezuela Bryozoa, Kinderhookian Brachiopods
16.00
LIV.
(Nos. 239-243). 327 pp., 24 pis
11.25
Dominican
ostracodes,
Texan pelecypods, Wisconsin mollusks,
Siphocypraea, Lepidocyclina.
Palaeontographica Americana
Volume
I.
See Johnson Reprint Corporation, 111 Fifth Ave.,
N Y.
Monographs of Areas,
II.
New
York,
10003
(Nos. 6-12).
Lutetia, rudistids
and venerids.
21.00
531 pp., 37 pis
Tertiary turrids, Neocene Spondyli, Paleozic cephalopods, Tertiary Fasciolarias and Paleozoic and
Recent Hexactinellida.
Heliophyllum
halli,
III.
(Nos. 13-25)
513 pp., 61 pis
Paleozoic cephalopod structure and phylogeny, Paleozoic
siphonophores, Busycon, Devonian fish studies, gastropod
studies, Carboniferous crinoids, Cretaceous jellyfish, Platystrophia, and Venericardia.
25.00
IV.
492 pp., 72 pis.
(Nos. 26-33).
Rudist studies, Busycon, Dalmanellidae, Byssonychia, Devonian lycopods, Ordovican eurypterids, Pliocene mol-
25.00
lusks.
V.
VI.
(Nos. 34-37).
445 pp., 101 pis.
Tertiary Arcacea, Mississippian pelecypods,
Cretaceous Gulf Coastal forams.
(Nos. 38) 49 pp., 19 pis
Lycopsids and sphenopsids of Freeport Coal.
32.00
Ambonychiidae,
3.75
BULLETINS OF AMERICAN PALEONTOLOGY
Vols. I-XXIII.
XXIV.
XXV.
XXVI.
See Kraus Reprint Corp., 16 East 46th
N. Y. 10017, U.S.A.
....
306 pp., 30 pis
Paleozoic fossils of Ontario, Oklahoma and Colombia, Mesozoic ehinoids, California Pleistocene and Maryland Miocene mollusks.
12.00
... ,..
420 pp., 58 pis
(Nos. 95-100).
Florida Recent marine shells, Texas Cretaceous fossils, Cuban
and Peruvian Cretaceous, Peruvian Eogene corals, and
geology and paleontology of Ecuador.
14.00
XXVm.
(Nos. 109-114).
XXXI.
12.00
(Nos. 88-94B).
(Nos. 101-108).
XXX.
New York,
334 pp., 27 pis
(Nos. 80-87).
Mainly Paleozoic faunas and Tertiary Mollusca.
XXVH.
XXIX.
St.,
376
pp.,
36 pis
.i
14.00
Tertiary Mollusca, Paleozoic cephalopods, Devonian fish and
Paleozoic geology and fossils of Venezuela.
412
pp.,
14.06
34 pis
Paleozoic cephalopods, Devonian of Idaho, Cretaceous and
Eocene mollusks, Cuban and Venezuelan forams.
(NOS. 115-116). 738 pp., 52 pis
Bowden forams and Ordovician cephalopods.
18.00
563 pp., 65 pis
(No. 117).
Jackson Eocene mollusks.
16.00
458 pp., 27 pis
(Nos. 118-128).
Venezuelan and California mollusks, Chemung and Pennsylvanian crinoids, Cypraeidae, Cretaceous, Miocene and Recent corals, Cuban and Floridian forams, and Cuban fossil
16.00
localities.
XXXD.
(Nos. 129-133).
294
Silurian cephalopods,
Mytilarca.
XXXHI.
,
16.00
pp., 39 pis
crinoid studies,
(Nos. 134-139). 448 pp., 51
Devonian annelids, Tertiary
graphy paleontology.
Tertiary forams,
and
16.00
pis
mollusks,
Ecuadoran
strati-
XXXIV.
400 pp., 19 pis
(Nos. 140-145).
Trinidad Globigerinidae, Ordovician Enopleura, Tasmanian
Ordovician cephalopods and Tennessee Ordovician ostracods and conularid bibliography.
16.00
XXXV.
(Nos. 146-154).
386 pp., 31 pis
G. D. Harris memorial, camerinid and Georgia Paleocene
Foraminifera, South America Paleozoics, Australian Ordovician cephalopods, California Pleistocene Eulimidae, Volutidae, and Devonian ostracods from Iowa.
16.00
412 pp., 53 pis
Globotruncana in Colombia, Eocene fish, Canadian Chazyan
Antillean Cretaceous rudists, Canal Zone Foraminifera,
16.00
XXXVI.
(Nos. 155160).
fossils,
XXXVII.
XXXVIII.
foraminiferal studies.
486 pp., 37 pis
(Nos. 161164).
Antillean Cretaceous Rudists, Canal
Stromatoporoidea.
16.00
Zone
Foraminifera,
447 pp., 53 pis
Venezuela geology, Oligocene Lepidocyclina, Miocene ostracods, and Mississippian of Kentucky, turritellid from Venezuela, larger forams, new mollusks, geology of Carriacou,
(Nos. 165-176).
16.00
Pennsylvanian plants.
XXXIX.
448 pp., 36 pis
„
(Nos. 177-183).
Panama Caribbean mollusks, Venezuelan Tertiary formations
and forams, Trinidad Cretaceous forams, American-European species, Puerto Rico forams.
16.00
^3