r
-^.y.
\5
BIMJ.ETINS
OI'
\
M R CA N
V.
1
^-\LlOXTOLOG^
VOL. XXIV
3i^
0> vJ^C-^-^O)
E
m
llMACA. N. Y.
IT.
S.
A.
CONTENTS OF VOLUME XXIV
Bulletin No.
Plates
80.
Nomenclatorial notes on Eocene Mollusca
By Katherine VanWinkle Palmer
81.
Devonian crinoids from the Mackenzie River Basin,
N. W. T., Canada
By Winifred Goldring
1-2
The correlation of certain Devonian faunas of eastern
and western Gaspe
By E. M. Kindle
3-4
Devonian Bryozoa of Gaspe
5-6
By Madeliene A. Fritz
A Devonian fauna from Colombia
By Kenneth E. Caster; Including Stratigraphic
Notes
By Axel A. Olsson
7-20
Notes on Cypraea heilprini Dall and Cypraea chilona
Dall with new species from the Pliocene of Costa
82.
82A.
83.
84.
Rica
By William Marcus Ingram
85.
86.
Pages
1-7
8-34
35-86
87-100
101-318
21
319-326
22
327-340
23-26
341-359
of Pennsylvanian crinoids from the vicinity
of Bartlesville, Oklahoma
27-29
By Harrell L. Strimple
359-386
New
_
from the Miocene of the Dominican Republic and Panama, with a survey of the
Miocene species of the Dominican Republic
By William Marcus Ingram
Reprint of Conrad's Jackson Eocene fossils as described and illustrated in the Philadelphia Academy
fossil Cypraeidae
of Natural Sciences, Proceedings for 1855, pp. 257-63
and Wailes' Report on the Agriculture and Geology
of Mississippi, 1854, pis.
87.
XIV-XVII
.-..
A group
.
Index
_
.
.
_
BULLETINS
AMERICAN
PALEONTOLOGY
VOL. XXIV
NUMBER
SO
Ithaca,
U.
New
S.
York,
A.
f^.
BUI
OF
AMERICAN PAI^BONTOLOGY
Vol. 24
No. 80
Nomenclatorial Notes On Eocene Mollusca
By
Katherine
July
Ithaca,
VanW. Palmer
I,
1938
New
York,
U. S. A.
NOAIENCLATORIAL NOTES ON EOCENE MOLLUSCA
By
Katherine \'an Winkle I'almer
At the time
of the puljHcatiori of the munoii-rapli
on
tlie
Clai-
bornian fauna^ the reference showing Ccclatitra Conrad, i8()5was preoccupic(h had not been found. Since that time the author
has located the citation wliich Conrad i;rol)ably liad in nhnd when
he changed the
name
of the
genus to Actcioncuuir
Tlie confusion in connection
discussed in detail
Claiborne and
will
))}
with these two names has been
the writer in the
work on the fa.una of the
Conrad himself used
not be repeated here.
iS53'* for a
Ccclatiira previousl_\- in
Naiad.
Actccoiicina
fore a substitute r.ame for Ccrlatura C^inrad,
lem
of
its
genotype
falls in that
which was suggested on
p.
categorw
i
The one
is
there-
and the probinterpretation
156 of the Claiborne work
ma_\-
be
eliminated.
Aldrichia Palmer''
insects aiid
named
X'aughan"
is
])reoccupied
in corals.
1)\'
.ihlricliia
Aldrichia Palmer
CrKpiillett''
is
in
herein re-
Tiinothia.
Attention
is
called to the reference by J.
W.
dates of the publication of the various parts of
"Histoire Naturelle des Mollusques Terrestres
Taxlor" on the
Moquin-Tandon's
et
Muviatiles de
iPalmer, K. V. W., Bull. Aiiicr. l^al., vol. 7, No. :V1, p. 154, 1S>:!7.
2Conrad, T. A., Amer. Jour, ("oiu'li.. vol. I, pp. 28, .'iS, 1865.
aConrad, T. A., ibid. y. 147.
4Coiirad, T. A., Acad. Nat. Sci., I'hila., Proc. vol. 6, p. 268. 185;i.
sPaliner, K. V. W., Bull., Amer. Pal., vol. 7, No. ;;2, p. 262, 1937.
sCoquillett, D. W., Trans. Amer. Entomol. Soc, vol. XXI, p. 9:5, 1894.
-Vaughr.n. T. W.. U. S. Geol. Sur., Men. vol. XXXIX, ]>. 70, 1900; Proc.
Biol. See. Wash., vol. XYI, p. 101. 1903.
Aldrichia Vaughan renamed.
sTaylor, J. W., Proc. Mai. Soc. London, vol. 6, p. 186, 190-1.
ikYti w«
4
Bulletin 80
4
were issued April 12, May 4, August i,
September 10, 1855 January 2, April 9, 1856 respectively. These
Conrad, Janudates definitely establish the priorit>- of PapilUna
The
France."
six parts
;
PapilUna AIoquin-Tandon, 1855.
Aluseum pointed
F. Stearns MacXeil, United States National
a t}pe for Cladesignated
out to the writer that Herrmannsen"
ary, 1855^ over
HerrSwainson, 1840 previous to other designations.
of
discussion
mannsen's statement of type was overlooked in the
z'ilithes
by the author^^ and the work of
The problem of Clavilithes Swainson.
of the Claibornian Clavilitlies
Grabau'- was followed.
1840" begins vritli Clavella Swainson, 1835^* for which it was a
name. How^ever, it does not seem that with the exception of one genus (p. 7,"Trochilea, type Trochus pilens. Auct.")
Swainson's "Elements of Modern Conchology" can be used for
He did not mention any
generic names without difficulty.
substitvite
names or references (exception p. 14, Mitreola, reference
The generic names are descriptions without species and
would therefore require special ruling as under Int. Rules Zool.
Nomenclature Opinion No. 46. In case of Clavella, the description reads, p. 20, "The genus Fusus, again, has no plaits it is so
specific
given).
;
closely allied to the fossil
that there can be
group";
no
p. 21,
plaits,
It
genus Clavella (here
no doubt
of
"Clavella Sw.
its
now
first
defined)
entering within the limits of this
Fuciform [fusiform]
but the tip of the spire enlarged.
;
channel long;
Fossil only."
appears that even though Clavilithes Swainson, 1840 was a
substitute
name
no
must take its type from the species mentioned
own description and the type so established becomes
for Clavella Swainson, 1835, since Clavella has
species, Clavilithes
under
its
the type of both genera (Int. Rules Zool.
Nomen., Art.
30, f.).
sConrad, T. A., Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. Proc. vol. 7, p. 262, 1855 Palmer,
K. V. W., Bull. Amer. Pal. vol. 7, No. 32, p. 363, 1937.
loHerrmannsen, A. N., Indicis Generum Malaeozoorum, vol. I, p. 246,
;
1S46.
iiPalmer, K. V. W., ibid, p. 356.
i2Grabau, A. W., Smith. Misc. Coll., vol. XLIV, p. 104, 1904.
isSwainson, Wm., A Treatise on Malacology etc., p. 304, 1840.
i^-Swainson,
Wm., Elements
of
Modern
Coneholog^-, pp. 20, 21, 1835.
NoMENCLATUIilAL NOTES
:
K. V. W. PaLMER
Herrmannsen designated Fnsus noce (Chem.). This is a valid
designation as F. nocc was listed in Swainson's original descripThe characters of F. noce disagree with
tion of Clavilithes, 1840.
the original description of Clavella because F. nocc (Chem.) Lam.
has plications on the columella during part of
its life
history, such
Mr. A. Wrigley, England^^ who
disappearing with maturity.
was consulted in this matter has expressed the opinion that such
noncomformity eliminates the use of F. noce (Chem.) Lam. as
a
genotype of Clavilithes.
also used.
of the
'
The
vagueness of
Losing F. noce
This
is
the reasoning w^hich Grabau^*^
writer does not favor this interpretation because
type of Clavella Swainson, 1835.
tlie
Lam.
as the genotype of Clavilithes
Swainson
causes a change in the current idea of the genus as well as a
conflict
with the subsequently
Lam.
Rhopalithes Grabau
named genus Rhopalithes Grabau/'
type F. noce
becomes
synonymous
with
Clavilithes
Swainson, 1840 and the forms of Clavilithes typified by C. parisiensis (Mayer-Eymar)=rC. longcevus (Desh.) non Solander are
without a generic or subgeneric name.
It is in this last
nonplicate
group that the Claibornian species belong.
However, there is
some doubt that Clavilithes needs to be separated on the character
of the columellar plications,
which do have
particularly
plications in the
young
when
stages of
those specimens
growth
lose
them
in the adult.
The presence or absence
of columellar plications
cannot always
be taken as a factor of generic differentiation in the gastropods.
A
example
genus including plicate and nonplicate
Eocene genus Mazzalina Conrad, i860
= (Bulbifiisus Conrad, 1865).^* Conrad made two genera on
characters which are now known to be only specific and in some
typical
shells
cases
is
of a
the Claibornian
may
not even be specific.
isPersonal letter. May 7, 1938.
i^Grabau, A. W., ibid, p. 104.
^
'Grabau, A. W., ibid, p. 135.
isHarris, G. D., Ark. Geol. Sur., Ann. Kept. State Geol.,
1892; Palmer, K. V. W., ibid, p. 349.
vol.
II, p.
165.
6
Bulletin 80
Q
The
prol^lem of Clarillthes
burdened
with
thorough work.
Swainson, 1840,
more
is
names
already too complicated to be
without
further
complete
and
Until then, the author prefers to use ClavUithes
{=Rlwpalithcs Grabau, 1904) genotxpe by sub-
sequent designation,
Herrmannsen, 1846,
Fitsits
(Chem.)
noce
Lam. to include the nonplicate forms of C. parisiensis (MayerEymar) Wrigley's'^ criticism of Grabau's study of the phylogen>'
.
of ClavUithes
shows that additional investigation must be made
on the group before a satisfactory conclusion is reached.
Since needless time is wasted in searching for Eulimella Forbes,
1:21846, as given b_\- authors-" it seems worthwhile to reiterate
dale's^^ affirmation that
no
sLich reference exists.
One
will
fmd
is an article by Forbes in the Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., vol.
412 but the genus Eulimella is no where mentioned in
that there
XIV,
p.
The date of the reference is 1844 instead of 1846.
Malaconchologists as H. and A. Adams, Fischer, Bucquoy, Dautzenberg and DoUfuss, Tryon, Sacco, Cossmann and many other
the article.
standard authors continued the error in their work. According
was the first to mention EtiUmella in liter-
to Iredale, Jeffreys-'
ature.
Jeffreys
was followed by Gray-^
gave the name and selected a type.
in the
same' year.
Gray
Iredale suggested that the
name Eulimella
as ascribed to Forbes was a manuscript name.
Such a supposition appears reasonable for particularly Jeffreys
was assisting Forbes^* in the work on the British Mollusca. Iredale prefers to give Gray credit for publishing the genus. Thiele-^
in his Handbuch assigns the genus to Gray.
However, it seems
to the
author that Jeffreys' reference of Eulimella
but with no designation of t}pe.
He
is
states "Eulimella
legitimate
(Forbes")
loWrigley, A. G., Proc. Mai. Soc. London, vol. XVII, pp. 222, 234-237,
1927.
soDall, W. H. and Bartseh, P., Bull. IT. S. Nat. Mus., No. 68, pp. 10, 17,
See Iredale, T., The Nautilus, vol. XXIV, No. 5, p. 53, 1910 for
1909.
previous lefereiiees.
2ilredale, I., ihid, p. 53.
aaJcffreys, J. G., Ann. Mag-. Nat. Hist., vol. XIX, p. 311, May, 1847.
23Gray, J. E., Proc. Zool. Soc. London, pt. XV, p. 160, Nov. 9 (read),
1847.
SAjeffreys, J. G., Hid, p. 309.
NOMENCLATORIAL NOTES
c;-c::sula, I\Ial.
Hi-t., vcl.
and Conch.
XiW
p.
412
.
.
J.
.
E.
MacAndrci, Forbes
Ann. Nat.
in
.
"
Eiilinnila (jracilis
K. V. W. PaLMER
:
(Followed
l\v
a description of this
last species.)
Authors-"
l;elicve that the E.
Andrei Forbes and
(Scacchi)
is
EuUuiclla and
genus
the
the species
it
is
crassida Jeffreys equals E.
same as E.
Tujrbes.
scUlcc (Scacchi).
Gra_\'
Vv-hich
the species which
assigned to
is
species
is
is
E.
Macscillar
used as the type of his
commonly used when
the
Fortunately therefore the same
can be designated as the type of EuUmclla
(Forbes)
Jeffreys and the established characters of the genus need not be
disturbed.
is
To
bring this about, in case the authority of the genus
granted Jeffrc}s, the genot\pe of EuUmella (lu^rbes) Jeffreys,
1847
herein designated as E.
^^
Andrei
(
crassula
Forbes) =/:. sciUcc (Scacchi).
and Scandinavia.
(Jeffreys)
Recent.
Fliocene and Pleistocene of
=£. Mac-
Great Britian
Ital}-
and
Sicil}-.
2'''T!!i?le, J., II:iii(ll)i:e!i diT Sy:itcmati;:'c'.:on Wcichtievkundo, pt. !, p. LD'.O,
1929.
2GForbes, E. and Hanley, S., Hist. Bntinh Moll., vol. Ill, j). ;;;i9. 1S')1
Dall, W. H. and Bartfch, P., U. S. Nat. Mus., Bull. No. CS, p. 10, l::; ;).
;
Paleontological Eepearch Institltion
May
25, 1938.
BULLETINS
AMERICAN
PALEONTOLOGY
VOL. XXIV
NUMBER
81
Ithaca,
U.
New
vS.
York,
A.
BUI,I,BTINS
OF
AMERICAN PAI,EONTOI,OGY
Vol. 24
No. 8 c
Devonian Crinoids from the Mackenzie River Basin,
N.
W.
T.,
Canada
By
Winifred Goldring
August
Ithaca,
U.
1938
15
New
S.
York.
A.
DEVONIAN CRINOIDS FROM THE MACKENZIE RIVER
BASIN, N. W. T., CANADA
By
Winifred Goldring
New York
State
Museum, Albany, N. Y.
from the Great Slave Lake
Northwest Territories, Canada,
was submitted to the writer for study by Doctor E. M. Kindle,
Victoria Memorial Museum, Ottawa.
Of this collection he
writes, "The horizon is probably not far from that rej^resented by
Ivecently a collection of crinoids
Mackenzie River
region,
basin.
two of our reports".
two new species Melocrinus borealis
and M. canadensis collected by E. J. Whittaker from the Hay
River section, the former below the Alexandra falls and the latThe Hay River section from
ter above the falls (ref. cit., p. 17).
which the crinoids were obtained was studied by Kindle who re-
crinoids described and figured by Springer in
In 1921 Springer described
4) the beds to the Upper Devonian, having found
a characteristic Portage fauna in the Simpson shale below the
ferred (1919,
p.
Melocrinus borealis
is
represented in the present collection from locality 7005, bed
h,
strata
from which the crinoids came.
Lady Evelyn
Falls section of the
locality 7300, the
fully referred to
Kakisa River; a few plates from
gorge section of the Redknife River are doubt-
M.
canadensis.
Springer relates M. borealis to
form described by Rowley (1893, p. 303;
1894, pp. 151, 153) from shales considered of Middle Devonian
later authorities of
(Hamilton) age by early geologists and
younger age {see Keyes 1894, p. 43; 1902, p. 271-273; Greger
M.
fersns, a Missouri
1)_\-
374; Sehuchert 1903a, p. 143, 1903b, p. 545; Weller,
1909, p. 264; Branson 1923, pp. 44-46). Springer concludes, "it
is clear that the fossils of the Missouri and Mackenzie Devonian
belong to the same palaeontological province, and are of approx^
p.
imatel}' the
same age"
(ref. cit. p. 15).
12
Bulletin 81
In his later paper (1926) Springer adds three new species of
Mclocrinus: M. kindlei and M. mackenzic from the coral reef in
limestone above the horizon of the Simpson shale. Root River
section and .1/. zvhiftakcri from the beds at least 300 feet above
;
No specimens of
and only a single specimen
inackeii::ic was found and this in the
shale in the Trout River section.
the
Simpson
A[.
kindici appear in the collection,
that can be referred to
.1/.
crinoid bed at the upper falls of the Redknife River.
specimens from the Redknife River section,
at the
new
upper
falls,
M.
species,
At
in the
least three
crinoid bed
Three
have been referred to M. zvhiifakeri.
M. sidcosutura and M. humei, are
subfilistriatiis,
here added from the Redknife River crinoid bed.
Springer also describes
(p.
132)
one species of H'exacrimis
H. hujnei) but Melocrimis is the only camerate genus represented to anv extent in the three collections and it is so far represented
Except for M. borealis which shows clo'se relab\' eight species.
tionship to species of Iowa, Missouri and Wisconsin, as pointed
(
;
out
b\-
Springer (1926,
127), the species of Melocrimis are "not.
p.
And
only thoroughly distinct from that, but also from each other.
the interesting thing about
them from
that in the characters by
which they
all other known American species,
M. mackcnzie and M. zvhittakeri']
a geological point of
the three
.
.
species [Af. kindlei,
exhibit a tendency to an
is
not observed
the abundant species of the Eifel limestone of the
which developed
member
nian (or lower)
koiiiiicki,
M.
in certain species
of the
Jiieroglyphicus
is
from
differ so completely
metrical construction of the calyx which
ian, but
view
asym-
among
Middle Devon-
belonging to the Fras-
Upper Devonian
in
Belgium
\_M.
(non Goldf.) Fraipont=Af. dewal-
von Koenen, M. henedeni and M. }iiespilijoniiis'\" (see also
Von Koenen, 1886). M. borealis has a
p.
similar, though less marked tendenc\' to as\'mmetr\' of the calyx,
qitci
129; Fraipont, 1883;
and
new species described here it as well-marked as
The single specimen of Hexacriuus in the collec-
in the three
in the others.
tion studied
alent ^liddle
by Springer (1926) represents "another very prevDevonian genus in the Eifel, but rare in x\merica.
Mackenzie Ckinoids: Goldring
... of a type complete!}- different from that of the
is
but which
TLifel,
Upper Devonian rocks
also represented in the
Belgium"
of
(p. 127).
In the collection untler consideration inadunate species of crin-
Lake Kakisa, one
oids are represented from
the south shore, west end
;
and eight miles above the mouth
Redknife River,
in the
half mile
back from
the gorge section of the Bouvier River
;
above the upper
gorge section and
falls
of the
at the third chute.
A
single specimen representing the Flexibilia was collected from
the crinoid bed near the base of the coral zone, Jean Marie River,
was found loose in the Trout River section, at the
foot of the long heavy rapid, one half mile below the lower cascade.
Only portions of the vertical side of two arms of the starfish are preserved, and not in very good condition, so that this
and a
startish
species has not been placed.
The
collections studied by Springer
taker in the
for the
Hay
were made by E.
by G.
River and Trout River sections
Root River
section.
In his later paper
.Springer has incorporated notes by
Mr.
;
(1926,
Whittaker
J.
Whit-
vS.
Hume
p.
and
128)
Mr.
Hume, relative to the stratigraphy of the crinoid-bearing beds.
The present collection, in so far as labelled, was collected by E.
The species of crinoids described in all collections
J. Whittaker.
so far submitted for stud\- are
CAMERATA
Melocrinus borealis Springer
M. canadensis Springer
M. kindlei Springer
M. mackenzie Springer
M. whittakeri Springer
M. sulcosutura Goldring
JM. subtilistriatus
?il.
I'.umei
Goldring
Goldring
Hexacrinus humei Springer
i'*
Bulletin 81
6
FLEXIBILIA
Synaptcjcrinus
(
rotunclatus Cioldring
?)
INADUNATA
Undetermined
;
sp.
Decadocrinus spinobrachiatus Goldring
Prininocrinus robustus Goldring
Linocrinus kindlei (ioldring
DESCRIPTION OF SPECIES
CAMERATA
Melocrinus canadensis Springer
Melocrinus canadensis Springer, Geol. Surv., Canada, Bui. 33,
p.
17, pi.
1921.
1, fig. 3,
Melocrinus canadensis was based by Springer upon a single
specimen lacking basal plates and
trix.
falls
onl_\-
from the ma-
parti}' free
In this collection, from the Trout River section at the third
(loc.
6978), are a few radial and interradial plates, partly
separated, which might be referred to this species
and then only
with doubt.
The only
of a larger
description given with the figure
and more robust
ness of which "this form
ton of western
t_\-pe \\'ith
b_\-
that this species
is
in the flat-
is
comparalile with one from the Hamil-
New York
figured by Hall, but ne\'er described,
under the name M. breviradiatus"
figured
is
very low plates,
Hall in 1872
(pi.
i,
(ref. cit., p.
figs.
18,
17).
The form
19) has since been de-
and refigured by the writer ( 1923, p. 127-130, pi. 13, figs, i
There is even more resemblance to Melocrinus clarkei (Hall
Ms) Williams from ^enesee and Portage beds of the Upper De-
scri])ed
2).
(
vonian of western
3-5
;
pi.
14).
The
New York
{see
anal tube, not characteristic of
nor found
in
any
ref. cit., p.
figured specimen of
of the
M.
132-136,
pi.
13, figs.
shows a short
the other species under discussion
specimens in
canadejisis
this collection.
MACKEiVziE Ckinoids: Goldrin'G
15
Melocrhilic whittakeri Springer
Mclocrinus
irhitlfiL-rri Spriii;L;x r,
Mclocrinus
The
stant.
15 miles
300
least
in
holot_\])e
was based l)y Sprinj^er upon three wellwhich the characters are thoroughlv concame from the Trout River section, about
its confluence with the AJa,ckenzie, "from Ijcds at
above the Simpson shale and thought to be s(nne-
feet
M.
tlian the
(
species
ref.
witli
cit.,
M.
]).
borealis horizon of the Ha\- River, l'p])er
In discussing the relationship of
132).
k'uidlci
and
Ri\er section Springer states that
them and
42, pp. 1;!1, l;i2,
above
what higher
Devonian"
this
Canada, Bui.
iriurv.,
Tvliittakcri
specimens
(letined
Ueol.
1926.
14-17,
24, fios.
pi.
others
all
known
]\\-
its
uiackcnrjic
.1/.
it
from the Root
"readily distinguished from
is
marked ovoid contour, and ex-
tremely small column facet, whicli indicates a considerabl\- different type of
column from
The tendenc}
species
is
that of the
at all similar to this
is
genus as generalh- found.
None
usually to a broad base.
of the Belgian
except in asymmetry"
(ref.
cit.).
In the collection submitted by Dr. Kindle are at least three
specimens that might be referred to
san;;e
.1/.
crinoid bed were collected three
but from
t^'hittakcri,
new
species
all
tlie
showing
a
small column facet and two of tliem with elongate ovoid cahx.
These new species
howe\er, easily distinguished from M.
are.
whittakeri.
One
large,
of the
The second
(24
specimens referred to
measuring zy mm.
mm.
bases).
to
to the
this
species
arm bases with
a
is
abnormally
broken basal cup.
s])ecimen has a height for the calyx of 28.2
arm bases)
;
the third 25.5
mm.
{22.2
mm.
to
mm.
arm
All the specimens, therefore, are larger than those de-
scribed by S])ringer
;
and the writer
l)elie\-es
mature forms, as indicated by the character
that they are
of the plates.
more
.Second-
ary thickening of crinoid plates develops in older forms sometimes
with quite striking dift'erence
in
scribes the plates of the calyx as
i)late
characters.
"smooth or
Si)ringer de-
slightly rugose, flat,
with a slight tendency to pitting at the angles, but without convex-
16
Bulletin 81
8
or median elevation either in dorsal cup or tegmen" (p. 131).
In these three specimens the pitting at the corners is well shown.
Thickening of the plates is seen at the margins, and there is a
ity
surrounded by
central raised area or flattened tubercle
In the second
depression due to the thickening at the margins.
plate
largest specimen an occasional
shows
a
a slight
more prominent
central tubercle.
Horizon and
locality.
— From the crinoid bed
at the
upper
falls,
Redknife River, locality 7288.
Melocrinus subtilistriatus
n.
Plate
sp.
1,
figs.
In the collection submitted by Dr. Kindle are a fairly large
1-5
num-
ber of specimens which in the shape of the calyx and the small
facet bear a strong resemblance to
column
25
are of
mm. and
from 15.7 mm. to
average calices measuring between 20.2
high with a width at the
Two
whittakeri.
The specimens
appears to be a smaller species.
size,
M.
arm
bases
particularly large specimens have heights of 24.6
mm.
This
medium
22 mm.
18 mm.
mm. and
All the specimens have asymmetrical, elongate ovoid
below to a very narrow
column facet, and also between
the veiy low tegmen with subcentral anal opening
calices contracting
more or
less strongly
base, with the characteristic small
the rays into
without a tube.
Specimens
in this .collection,
if
seen alone, might give the im-
pression of being varieties of the species, or even different species,
because of the presence in some of faint
stellate
ornamentation,
and more tumid plates. However, the
writer has picked out a series showing the relation of one stage
One specimen shows the "smooth or slightly rugose,
to the next.
flat plates", referred to by Springer (1926, p. 131) in his descripin others of raised ridges
tion of
M.
whittakeri, with pitting at the angles.
shows remnants
ticularly well
Closer inspection
of delicate carinse crossing the suture lines, par-
shown on the
A
radials, first
primibrachs and primary
second specimen shows beautifully a delicate
ornamentation of groups of two or three fine carinae extending
interbrachials.
Mackenzie Okinuids: Goldring
17
from center to center of the hasals, raclials, first primibraclis and
primary interbracliials. Usually the center ridge of each group
is
The higher
stronger.
and interradial
plates of the radial
series
have strong ridges, usually only one running from center to center
with an accomi)anying deeper pitting at the angles.
grew
viduals
x-\s
the indi-
older changes in the character of the ornamentation
took place, well-shown in the selected series of specimens.
thicken
carin;e
with
ridges
into
low ridge following each radial
and with
rugose character
this a
is
thickening process continues the
this
I'he
of
a
is
de-
of
the
the center of the plates, ]iarticularly the i)rimar_\- inter-
b'"achials,
tumid,
Sometimes there
marking the junction
series.
veloped a central blunt tubercle,
cariui'e at
As
development
the
witli the
presence of cariuce indicated,
gixen to the plates.
plates
if
become
at all,
tjuite
only at the
sutures and on the higher interbrachials, especially of the anal
Thickening
interradius.
of the plates at the
margin tends
to de-
velop depressed sutures.
Horizon and
locality.
— The
cotypes are from locality 7288, the
Redknife River. There are other
locality
and from localit}' 7291, bed
from
same
the
specimens
marked c (field No. 267), 34 "lile below the upper falls, Redknife
River; probably also from localit}' 7005, bed h, Lady Evelyn F'alls
crinoid bed
section,
at the
upper
Kakisa River.
Remarks.
—The
specific
striated character of the
rpecies
falls,
from both M.
Melocrinus sulcosutura
name
is
given because of the finely
ornamentation which distinguishes
zvhiffakeri
this
and M. sulcosufura.
Plate
n. sp.
1,
fig.
6
From the same crincjid bed in which M. sitbtilisfriatiis is so
abundant was collected a single somewhat crushed specimen of
the same type, but with enough differences to warrant placing it
new
cup and part of the
from
the
gorge section at the
tegmen are preserved. A fragment
lowest chute, Redknife River (loc. 7300) has also been referred tc
in a
species.
this species.
Nearly
all
of the dorsal