TÓM tắt TIẾNG ANH NCS TRẦN THỊ HỒNG NHUNG

MINISTRY EDUCAITION AND TRAINING MINISTRY OF JUSTICE

HANOI LAW UNIVERSITY

TRAN THI HONG NHUNG

THEORY AND PRACTICE OF INVESTOR - STATE
DISPUTE SETTLEMENT: APPLYING TO VIETNAM
IN THE CURRENT CONTEXT OF INTERNATIONAL
ECONOMIC INTEGRATION

SUMMARY OF DOCTORAL THESIS IN LAW

HANOI, 2019


The thesis is completed at
HANOI LAW UNIVERSITY

Science suppervisor: Assos.Prof. Dr. NGUYEN VU HOANG

Referee 1: Assos.Prof. Dr. Le Mai Thanh

Referee 2: Assos.Prof. Dr. Tang Van Nghia

Referee 3: Dr. Nguyen Thai Mai

The thesis will be examined by Examination Board of Hanoi Law
University
at:……………………………………………………………………

The thesis can be found at:
1. National Library
2. Library of Hanoi Law University


1
INTRODUCTION
1. Necessity of research theme
Globalization, regionalization of the economy is an inevitable trend,
which has a strong impact on subjecs in international economic relations. In
fact, this trend not only creates a deeper and broader link between the subjects
but also forms a strongly competitive environment at the international level,
creating a significant challenges for the subjects. In this context, international
investment, one of the key economic activities, playing an important role in the
economic development of countries in the world is also strongly influenced by the
conditions of economic integration, global economic competion and crisis. Since
the late 1990s, there have been many disputes between entities involved in
international investment activities, especially investor - state disputes, a particular
type of dispute compared to other disputes arising in this field, because one party
to the dispute is a state, called respondents which have special legal status.
Therefore, resolving this dispute becomes one of the problems for the host state in
condition of formulating and perfecting international investment policies and
laws.
Along with the development of economy, international investment
relations, the investor - state dispute has become more and more complicated
in recent years. In the face of this situation, the host state has recognized the
need to reconsider the international investment policy system on resolving
disputes between foreign investors and the host countries. Ensuring effective
prevention and settlement of disputes will both have implications for market
opening policies, attracting investment, economic development, building

prestige and national image in relations. International investment has both
ensured the interests of people and nations.
Basing on the nature of international investment, this type of dispute is
common among investors in developed countries and the host states are
developing countries. Therefore, Vietnam as well as other developing countries
will have to ensure a favorable investment and business environment for foreign
investors and appropriate adjustments and solutions in the tournament.
resolving issues related to this type of dispute. In particular, in current
conditions, Vietnam not only has to implement its commitments in the system


2
of previous investment agreements but also has to implement agreements in a
number of new generation of free trade agreements. Specifically, our country
has participated in negotiating and signing the Trans-Pacific Economic
Partnership Agreement (TPP), the Free Trade Agreement between Vietnam and
the European Union (EVFTA) and recently the Agreement Comprehensive and
trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), which has very strict commitments on
liberalization and protection of investment in general and resolving disputes
between foreign and national investors. receive investment in particular.In the
above situation, the study of the topic "Theory and Practice of Investor – State
Disputes Settlement: Applying to Vietnam in the current context of
international economic integration”, has both theoretical and practical
significance, and this is really a necessary issue for Vietnam in the current
conditions.
2. Research aims and obligations
● Research Aims
Purpose of the study is to build a system of solutions to the improvement
effectiveness of preventing and resolving Investor and host state from Vietnam
in the context of international economic integration today.

● Research Obligations
To implement the above mentioned purpose, the thesis sets out the
following research aims:
- Analyzing theoretical issues on investor - state dispute settlement such
as the concept and characteristics of investor - state dispute, the cause of the
dispute. In addition, the thesis will focus on clarifying the concept and
characteristics of investor - state dispute settlement, generalizing the content
law as well as the investor -state dispute settlement mechanism. Presenting
models of investor - state dispute settlement reforms.
- Studying the practice of ISDS in India through analysis of the situation
of dispute settlement between foreign investors and India in the recent time .
This shows the adjustment of ISDS policy to be consistent with the ISDS reality
of this state. Besides, the thesis will make predictions about the difficulties that
India faces when implementing the ISDS reform policy. Moreover, the thesis
also reviews the India's ISDS reform policy. Finally, giving meaningfull lessons


3
needed for Vietnam.- Doing research the content of investment liberalization and protection
standards, the ISDS mechanisms under the current two new generation FTAs of
Vietnam such as CPTPP and EVFTA. From that points out the differences
compared with the commitments on liberalization of investment protection
regulated by other agreements; And make a comparison ISDSM of these two
agreements with other legal dispute settelemt mechanisms in general, the ISDS
mechanisms under other Vietnamese IIAs in particular.
- Researching practice of dispute settlement between foreign investors
and Vietnam in current conditions.- Building the system of solutions to improve effectiveness of preventing
and resolving investor -state disputes of Vietnam in the implementation period
of ISDS commitments under the new generation FTAs.
3. Research Object and Scope

● Research Object
Investor – State dispute settlement
● Research Scope
Stemming from the practical requirements of ISDS in the current
condition of international economic integration in Vietnam, the thesis will focus
on researching theory and practice on ISDS to apply for Vietnam. In particular,
in the context that Vietnam has participated in negotiating and signing new
FTAs including ISDS commitments, as follows:
⮚ About content:
- Researching the theoretical issues of investor - state disputes, ISDS,
substantive law and ISDSM so that it can be applied to resolve this type of
dispute in Vietnam's current conditions.
- Researching on practice of ISDS from some states in the world.
- Studying the status of the ISDS law and ISDS of Vietnam in the current
conditions.
- Studying solutions to improve effectiveness of prevention and
settlement for Vietnam when resolving disputes between foreign investors and
Vietnam in the context of enforcing both ISDS commitments under new


4
generation of FTAs like as CPTPP and EVFTA.
The above contents are studied within the scope of international
investment relations between foreign investors and the host states rather than
other administrative, commercial or non-commercial relations.
⮚ In terms of space: The thesis has general researches on ISDS in a
number of states around the world in general, which aim to states with
favorable development conditions, international investment system are similar
to Vietnam, especially India. Moreover, the above theoretical and practical
studies will be applied to solve this type of dispute in Vietnam.

⮚ About time: The thesis is studied to build solutions for Vietnam in
the current period, at the present time when Vietnam has negotiated and signed
new generation free trade agreements such as CPTPP, EVFTA
4. Theoretical basis, research questions, research hypotheses and
approaches to research issues
● Theoretical basis
- Theory of Investor - State Dispute
- Theory of Investor - State Dispute Settlement
● Research questions
- What is the comprehensive theoritical basis to be applied to resolve
disputes between foreign investors and the host country?
- How is the practice of ISDS in states which are similar to Vietnam?
- What are differences of the ISDS commitments under new generation
FTAs which Vietnam is a member of
- How does the current practice of ISDS of Vietnam take place?
- Are there any solutions to improve the effectiveness of preventing and
resolving investor - state disputes during the implementation of ISDS
commitments under the new generation FTAs that Vietnam is a member of?
● Research Hypotheses
The thesis topic is based on the research hypotheses:
- The theoretical system of ISDS has existed and has been increasingly
improved to be more suitable for the development of international investment
relations, ensuring legitimate rights and interests for both foreign investors and


5
the host state. There includes a range of issues related to investor -state
disputes, ISDS and ISDS mechanism. The practice of ISDS is very diverse and
has occurred in some countries with similar conditions with Vietnam. In particular,
the most notable case is India, the country in the top 10 most sued states, has accepted

the ISDS policy but also had radical reforms to prevent and resolve this type of
dispute is more effective. Vietnam can get many lessons learned from this example.
- Vietnam has been sued by foreign investors on the basis of commitments to ISDS.
- Regulations on ISDS in the new generation FTAs of Vietnam have many
differences compared with the previous regulations in both content and form.
- There are many different solutions in both preventing and solving this
type of dispute in Vietnam's current conditions.
● Approaches to research issues
The research is based on the following approach:
- Approaching from theoretical issues in ISDS
- Approaching from the practice of ISDS of the states with similar
conditions on economic and investment to Vietnam.
- Approaching from ISDS commitments under the new generation FTAs
of Vietnam and the current status of ISDS of Viet Nam.
5. Methodology
Based on the methodology of Lenin Marxism, Ho Chi Minh's thought, the
views and guidelines of the Party and State of Vietnam in the innovation
process, to realize the research objectives and tasks in the thesis, the thesis has
used a number of main methodologies including: analysis, synthesis,
comparison, in which there are methodologis of comparing laws and of case
studies. These methodologis are used independently or in combination.
Methods of analysis and synthesis are applied in approaching problems in
all chapters of the thesis. Summarizing, analyzing and assessing the theoretical
issues of disputes between foreign investors and host states, ISDS, ISDS
mechanis. In addition, these two methods are also used to study practices
related to ISDS, a model of ISDS, practice of ISDS in India. Especially the
ISDS mechanisms in CPTPP and EVFTA, as well as the situation of resolving
this type of dispute in Viet Nam. The integrated method is also used to collect
information from secondary data sources such as online databases, UNCTAD,

6
OECD, ICSID ... and Vietnamese authorities. The legal comparative method is
used to make new assessment of ISDS mechanism in CPTPP and EVFTA and
present some contents of ISDS mechanism in Chapter 3. Especially in Chapter
4, the method is used to anticipate the problems that Vietnam faces to in the
integration conditions when implementing ISDS mechanisms of new generation
FTAs and to develop appropriate solutions for Vietnam.
The case study method is used to study the investor – state disputes of
some countries in general, India in particular. Specially, it is applied to research
ISDS cases of Vietnam.
6. The scientific and practical significance of the thesis topic
- Completing the theory of investor - state dispute settlement by building
up the concept of investor - state dispute, ISDS and ISDSM, characteristics of
the dispute, ISDS and ISDSM. Moreover, analyzing the general content and
characteristics of alyzing the basic ISDS commitments under the CPTPP and
EVFTA.
3.2.2. Differences in standards of investment liberalization and protection
under the CPTPP and EVFTA agreements
Similar to previous IIAs, CPTPP and EVFTA also set standards for
investment liberalization such as MFN, NT or investment protection standards
such as FET, FPS, Expropriatio, compension and transfer. ... However, the
content of each standard has many new points compared to previous
commitments. From the perspective of being the substantive law in ISDS, those
differences have a decisive meaning to the arising situation and settlement
results the dispute. Here are some new main points of these standards under
CPTTP and EVFTA.
3.2.2.1. Expanding scope of adjustment of the principle of most favored
national treatment (MFN), the principle of national treatment (NT)
3.2.2.2. Adjusting principles of fair and equitable treatment (FET) and full

security protection (FPS)
3.2.2.3. Specifying expropriation and compensation for damages
3.2.3. Contents of ISDS mechanisms in Vietnam's new generation of FTAs


17
3.2.3.1. The ISDS Mechanism under CPTPP Agreement
CPTPP is an agreement that has been evaluated with many significant
impressive factors in the current context of global international economic
integration. This is a regional agreement with a wide range of impacts. Among
the numerous specials of this CPTPP Agreement, the investment chapter is
considered as special and even controversial chapter for its members.
The content of investment is stipulated in Chapter 9 of the Agreement, the
chapter includes two sections A and B with 30 Articles and 12 Annexes from A
to L (Appendix L is suspended). Section A contains 17 Terms to explain the
terms, scope of application, basic principles of investment ... Section B contains
13 Articles, which directly stipulate ISDS. Some of the provisions in Section A
and all of the provisions in Section B constitute the latest version of ISDS
specified in international economic agreements in recent decades. The basic
content of this mechanism includes provisions on the subjects of dispute;
methods, procedures for each dispute resolution method is used.
3.2.3.2. Mechanism for foreign investor and Viet Nam Dispute Settlement under
the EVFTA Agreement
The content of the ISDS mechanism under EVFTA includes a number of
regulations on the subjects of dispute; methods, procedures are based on the
ISDS regulations and the scope of application of this mechanism. The scope of
ISDSM under EVFTA depends on the scope of investors and investment
concept specified in the agreement. In particular, the concept of investment is a
fundamental influential concept, EVFTA investment means all types of assets
owned or managed directly or indirectly by investors of a contracting party in

the territory of the other contracting party of the Agreement.
⮚ Dispute subjects
It is the same as other disputes, the Agreement must determine the status
of plaintiffs and defendant of the disputes. The plaintiff defined in Paragraph
3, Article 2 of Section 3.1 is an investor of a Member State that may be a
natural or juridical person who has, or will, conduct investment activities within
its territory of other contracting members of the Agreement. The defendant is
either a member of the Vietnam, EU or EU member states.
⮚ Dispute settlement methods


18
VFTA is one of the FTAs that offers the most dispute resolution methods:
negotiation, mediation, consultation, and the system of permanent investment
courts (Investment Tribunal System).
⮚ Procedures
To ensure the maintenance of relationships between the disputing parties,
minimize time and costs. The Agreement provides for the priority of using
alternative dispute resolution methods (ADR) including negotiation and
mediation. Mandatory nature, application procedure of each method in relation
to other methods is not the same. Negotiation and mediation procedures are not
required and are entirely dependent on the choice of the parties in the dispute.
In contrast, consultations and courts require mandatory procedures, in which
the consultations must be applied before approaching to a tribunal method is a
permanent investment court.
⮚ Enforcement
This is the final procedure in dispute settlement which is of interest to the
parties. Regulations on enforcement of award will ensure actual effectiveness of
the ISDS mechanism under the Agreement.
3.2.3.3 Differences of the ISDS mechanisms under EVFTA and CPTPP

* Detailed and strict regulations
First, about the level of detail
Second, about the tightness
* Scope
* Transparency
3.3. Practice and general assessment of the situation of resolving
disputes between foreign investors and Vietnam
According to statistics of UNCTAD, Vietnam is in the group of foreign
investors who sued the least. Currently, Argentina is the most heavily sued with
60 cases, followed by Venezuela with 44 cases. In Southeast Asia, in 2017
Indonesia was the most sued country with 7 cases, Vietnam and the Philippines
ranked second with 5 cases, but in 2018 our country became the most sued
country in the region with 8 cases. Foreign investors in Vietnamese lawsuits
come from developed economies like the Netherlands, France and the United


19
States. However, according to information collected from a number of
documents, Vietnam now faces 16 petitions of foreign investors. With the
mechanism of not disclosing case information in previous IIAs, access to
official information is very difficult. Below are the most basic summaries from
foreign investors suing Vietnam that UNCTAD collected, which partly reflects
the practice of resolving disputes between foreign and Vietnamese investors in
the period. current paragraph.
3.3.1. Number of disputes
3.3.2. Applicable law and violation
3.3.3. Institutions and arbitration rules of arbitration
CONCLUTION OF CHAPTER 3
Chapter 3 of the thesis is built on the basis of analyzing the reality of
ISDS in general, then focusing on in-depth analysis of the case of India, the

state that has similarities with Vietnam, to give lessons for Viet Nam. Besides
the international practical analysis of ISDS, the remaining content of Chapter
focuses on clarifying the practice of dispute resolution, analyzing the legal and
practical foundation for resolving the disputes in current stage. Like many
other developed countries, in order to encourage and attract foreign
investment, Vietnam soon accepted the ISDS mechanism in the early 1990s
through negotiating and signing BITs with many developed countries.
Therefore, mainly ISDS mechanisms are expressed through BITs, later
developed in FTAs and especially Vietnam has accepted in new generation
FTAs, such as CPTPP, EVFTA. Due to differences with previous ISDSM
systems, this Chapter chose to analyze the content and differences of ISDS
commitments in the two new generation agreements to study.
Vietnam 's ISDS practice has been stated to demonstrate legal
assessments of the ISDS practice in Vietnam in the current period. Given the
current situation of both dispute settlement law and practice, Vietnam will face
many challenges in resolving the disputes. Although, the ISDS commitments
under CPTPP and EVFTA have many new points to balance the interests
between foreign investors and the host states, overcome some disadvantages of
previously existing ISDS commitments. But these commitments will still have


20
potential challenges for Vietnam, at least from the perspective of foreign
investors always have the right to sue Vietnam to international jurisdiction
agencies if they assume that Vietnam violated the commitments under new
generation FTAs. Specially, more complicated because Vietnam still have to be
implementing ISDS commitments under previous IIAs. Therefore, Vietnam
needs to identify the issues set out and build a solution system in both
preventing and resolving the disputes in accordance with the period of
international economic integration.

CHAPTER 4
SOLUTIONS TO IMPROVEMENT ON EFFECTIVENESS OF
INVESTOR – STATE DISPUTE PREVENTION AND SETTLEMENT
FOR VIET NAM IN THE CONDITION OF INTERNATIONAL
ECONOMIC INTEGRATION
4.1. Issues raised from the ISDS practice of Vietnam
Besides the different positive impacts, ISDS also has potential legal riks
for the host states like as Vietnam. It includes common issues which other
countries have been dealt with, and specific issues arising only in the economic,
social and legal conditions of Vietnam.
4.1.1. Common issues are raised in ISDS
Here are problems arising from the common ISDS practices of states
around the world and cannot be an exception for Vietnam.
Although, investment arbitration is considered as a method of domestic
business dispute resolution as well as disputes in international business have many
advantages due to ensuring objective factors through selection of arbitration
centers, arbitrators and selection of arbitration procedure rules. But these are not
promoted in ISDS, the weaknesses analyzed below have significant impacts on the
host state when this method is applied to ISDS. First: Transparency; Second:
Arbitration decision is not consistent; Third: High arbitration costs
4.1.1.1. Risk of economic damage to the investment recipient country
According to UNCTAD statistics, the number of disputes between foreign
investors and developing or underdeveloped countries accounts for 60%, while
developed countries account for only 40%. This means that in countries with
developing and underdeveloped economies, there will be more problems with
disputes from foreign investors of developed economies. When participating in


21
the above disputes, the host states may be subject to two types of damages:

First: The cost of dispute resolution.
Second: Compensation for foreign investors is huge
4.1.1.3. Control common issues of investment receiving countries
The notable question surrounding the application of ISDS commitments
is whether or not this mechanism ensures elements of environmental protection,
public interests, social ethics ....
4.1.2. Parallel Implementation of various ISDS mechanisms
In the coming time, when CPTPP takes effect, IPA will be completed
negotiation and arising effectively, Vietnam will be one of the few countries to
implement parallel models of different typical ISDS mechanisms, with
especially points in the above-mentioned FTAs. It is not necessary to specify
new legal issues in the process of implementing ISDS mechanism of new
generation FTAs, there will still be pressures on Vietnam in ISDS
4.1.3. Difficulties in implementing ISDS under CPTPP, EVFTA
Although there are new and progressive points compared to the previous
ISDS commitments, the content of some new regulations in the ISDS
commitments of CPTPP, EVFTA will still have many difficulties for Vietnam
in the implementation process such as : Scope of ISDS is large. Obligations on
MFN, NT, minimum treatment standards (FET, FPS), expropriation and
compensation... are maintained in investment liberalization and protection.
Content adjustments to those principles are not really strong enough to reduce
the risk of foreign investors suing Vietnam. In addition, some new additions to
the principle of applying customary international law and requirements for
transparency, new permanent investment court model or enforcement ... will be
requirements that Vietnam is not easy to when implementation.
4.2. Solutions in preventing and resolving disputes between foreign
investors and Vietnam
4.2.1. In preventing disputes arising
Preventing disputes arising is one of the solutions that are highly
appreciated by many countries in implementing the dispute settlement between

22
foreign investors and the host state. The effectiveness of prevention will bring
many different positive effects to the economy and society of the host states.
Therefore, in the current context, this is the first solution that Vietnam will have
to study and apply. Based on international experience, background of Vietnam's
ISDS laws and practices, here are some basic preventive measures as follows:
4.2.2.1. Improving domestic laws to ensure compliance with international
investment commitments
4.2.1.2. Propagate, disseminate, explain the differences of the new mechanism
4.2.1.3. Training human resources for resolving disputes
4.2.1.4. Developing mechanisms to receive and handle problems of foreign
investors
4.2.2. In dispute resolution
4.2.2.1. Maximizing the effectiveness of negotiation, mediation and consultation
4.2.2.2. Completing the Regulation on coordination of investment dispute
settlement
4.2.2.3. Focusing on authority of international tribunal in ISDS
4.2.2.4. Enforcing awards of ISDS institution.
4.2.2.5. In-depth research is needed on new issues in ISDS
CONCLUSION OF CHAPTER 4
On the basis of the theoretical and practical basis of Chapter 2 and
Chapter 3, Chapter 4 analyzed all the issues raised for Vietnam when resolving
the disputes in the current conditions. With the position of a capital importer,
Vietnam will encounter common difficulties in ISDS at the current stage as the
limitations of investment arbitration, the risk of economic losses due to the
compensation and the cost of participating in lawsuits, difficulties to control
environmental issues, ensuring public benefits ... In addition, in the current
context, Vietnam will have its own difficulties such as implementing many

kinds of Different ISDS commitments, dealing with new issues in EVFTA,
CPTPP ISDS commitments.


23
In the above conditions, in order to improve the effectiveness of
prevention and settlement of the disputes, Vietnam should implement a
system of solutions. Therefore, the following section of this Chapter focuses
on presenting the proposed solution system. The solutions are divided into
two groups: solutions in prevention and solutions in dispute resolution. These
solutions aim to reduce the legal risks for Vietnam when implementing ISDS
commitments in the current conditions.


24
GENERAL CONCLUSION
The process of implementing the "Theory and Practice of Investor" State Disputes Settlement: Applying to Vietnam in the current context of
international economic integration", The thesis offers some general statements
below.
Firstly, in the context of strong bilateral and regional economic integration, the
wave of suing for the host state based on IIAs continues to increase are still a
problem for economies. The theoretical issues related to both the content and form of
dispute settlement between foreign investors and the host country are also changing
constantly and not the same when building the international investment law.
Secondly, Vietnam is not an exception, a developing country, has signed
and implemented IIAs since the 1990s, now has participated in a number of
new generation FTAs with ISDS commitments such as EVFTA and CPTPP.
ISDS under the agreements have many differences compared to those already
existed and implemented earlier. Moreover, although not much, Vietnam had to
participate in some disputes sued by foreign investors and the number of

lawsuits also increased rapidly in recent years.
Thirdly, Inspite of the current conditions, it will not be easy for our
country when any foreign investors can sue Vietnam at international arbitration
tribunal at any time, assuming that Vietnam violates the investment
commitments investment under previous IIAs as well as new generation FTAs.
There are a number of difficulties in preventing and resolving these disputes in
the context of having to implement ISDS commitments under both IIAs and
new generation FTAs. Therefore, Vietnam should conduct a series of different
solutions to effectively implement these commitments in the current period.
The solution is built in two ways of preventing and resolving disputes to
minimize the impacts for Vietnam
On the basis of such observations, after the process of conducting
research on the topic, the thesis has achieved remarkable results both in theory
and practice on ISDS as follows:
- Completing concept, characteristics of investor - state dispute.
- Analyzing the general content and characteristics of ISDS substantive


25
law of ISDS. Building definition, characteristics of ISDS and ISDSM.
Moreover, ; studying the development process of the ISDSM until the time of
having the ISDS commitments under new generation FTAs. Analyzing the
models of ISDS reform in order to effective improvement of ISDS in the world.
- Analyzing the practice of ISDS in India and thereby providing necessary
lessons for Vietnam in the context of
implementation of the ISDS
commitments under the new generation FTAs.
- Comprehensive analysis of the content and different characteractics of
investment liberlization and protection commitments as well as ISDSMs under
CPTTP and EVFTA, the two new generation FTAs of Vietnam. Moreover,

analyzing the differences of these mechanisms in comparision to the ISDSM
under previous IIAs. Pointing out issues when resolving disputes between
foreign investors and Vietnamese State in the implementation of ISDS
commitments under those FTAs.
- Analyzing the reality of ISDS in Vietnam up to now.
- Proposing a system of solutions to improve the effectiveness of
preventing and resolving this type of dispute in the context of implementation
of the ISDSMs under Vietnam's new generation FTAs.
Although the above research results have been achieved, but within the
framework of the thesis, some contents related to the topic are necessary and
meaningful in both theory and practice. These issues should be further studied
in the future.
- Continued research on the impact or outcome of policy reforms on ISDS
of India.
- Research more models of practical experiences on reforming ISDS in
countries with similar conditions with Vietnam, thereby building lessons
suitable experience for Vietnam.
- Improving solutions to improve the effectiveness of preventing and
resolving the disputes for Vietnam in a specialized direction towards each
subject and managing problem group.


LIST OF WORKS RELATED TO
THE THESIS HAVE BEEN PUBLISHED
1.

Tran Thi Hong Nhung (2017), “Ap dung nguyen tac cong nhan
quyen mien tru cua quoc gia trong giai quyet tranh chap giua nha
dau tu nuoc ngoai va nha nuoc tiep nhan dau tu”, Legal
Professions Review, Vol.5 , page 50-54.

2.

Tran Thi Hong Nhung (2018), “Nhung diem moi ve giai quyet
tranh chap giua nha dau tu nuoc ngoai va nha nuoc tiep nhan dau
tu theo mau Hiep dinh dau tu song phuong nam 2015 cua An
Do”, Viet Nam Trade and Industry Review, No. 12, page 39-34.

3.

4.

Tran Thi Hong Nhung (2018), “Su phat trien cua co che giai
quyet tranh chap giua nha dau tu nuoc ngoai va Nha nuoc tiep
nhan dau tu trong phap luat dau tu quoc te”, Legal Profession
Review, Vol. 6, page 40 – 44.
Tran thi Hong Nhung (2019), “Cai cach chinh sach ve giai
quyet tranh chap giưa nha dau tu nuoc ngoai va nha nuoc tiep
nhan dau tu của An Do”, Democracy and Law Review, No.1
(322), page 19 – 24.