GRUADUATION THESIS
PAGE 1
INSTRUCTOR
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DOCUMENTATIONS
I. STANDARD DESIGN
[1] “Bộ Xây dựng (2012), TCXDVN 5574: 2012 Kết cấu bê tông và bê tông cốt thép –
Tiêu chuẩn thiết kế, NXB Xây dựng, Hà Nội.”
[2] “Bộ Xây dựng (2007), TCVN 2737: 1995 Tải trọng và tác động – Tiêu chuẩn thiết
kế, NXB Xây dựng, Hà Nội.”
[3] “Bộ Xây dựng (2007), TCVN 229: 1999 Chỉ dẫn tính toán thành phần động của tải
trọng gió, NXB Xây dựng, Hà Nội.”
[4] “Bộ Xây dựng (2007), TCXD 198: 1997 Nhà cao tầng – Thiết kế bê tông cốt thép
toàn khối.”
PROJECT: GOODS INSPECTION CENTER
STUDENT: XXX
GRUADUATION THESIS
PAGE 2
INSTRUCTOR
[5] “Bộ Xây dựng (2014), TCVN 10304: 2014 Móng cọc – Tiêu chuẩn thiết kế.”
[6] “Bộ Xây dựng (1998), TCXD 205: 1998 Móng cọc – Tiêu chuẩn thiết kế.”
[7] “Bộ Xây dựng (1995), TCVN 4453: 1995 Kết cấu bê tông và bê tông cốt thép toàn
khối - Quy phạm nghiệm thu và thi công.””
II.
REFERENCE BOOKS
[8] “Bộ Xây dựng (2008), Cấu tạo bê tông cốt thép, NXB Xây dựng.”
[9] “Nguyễn Trung Hòa (2008), Kết Cấu Bê Tông Cốt Thép theo Quy phạm Hoa Kỳ,
NXB Xây dựng.”
[10]
“Nguyễn Đình Cống (2008), Tính toán thực hành cấu kiện bê tông cốt thép
theo TCXDVN 356 -2005 (tập 1 và tập 2), NXB Xây dựng Hà Nội”.
[11]
“Vũ Mạnh Hùng (2008), Sổ tay thực hành Kết cấu Công trình, NXB Xây
dựng.”
[12]
“Nguyễn Văn Quảng (2007), Nền móng Nhà cao tầng, NXB Khoa học Kỹ
thuật.”
[13]
“Châu Ngọc Ẩn (2005), Nền móng, NXB Đại học Quốc gia TP. Hồ Chí
Minh.”
[14] “Võ Bá Tầm (2011), Kết cấu bê tông cốt thép, tập 1, Cấu kiện cơ bản theo
TCXDVN 356-2005,NXB Đại học Quốc gia TP.Hồ Chí Minh.”
[15]
“Võ Bá Tầm (2011), Kết cấu bê tông cốt thép, tập 2, Các cấu kiện nhà cửa theo
TCXDVN 356-2005,NXB Đại học quốc gia TP.Hồ Chí Minh.”
[16]
“Võ Bá Tầm (2011), Kết cấu bê tông cốt thép, tập 3, Các cấu kiện đặc biệt theo
TCXDVN 356-2005,NXB Đại học Quốc gia TP.Hồ Chí Minh.”
III.
[17]
[18]
[19]
SOFTWARE
“SAP 2000 version 14.2.”
“ETABS version 9.7.4”
Autocad 2014.
IV. WEBSITE
[20] “hDEADp://dangiaohcm.com/cay-chong-tang-4m-31779.LLml”
PROJECT: GOODS INSPECTION CENTER
STUDENT: XXX
GRUADUATION THESIS
PAGE 3
PROJECT: GOODS INSPECTION CENTER
INSTRUCTOR
STUDENT: XXX
GRUADUATION THESIS
CHAPTER 1
PAGE 4
INSTRUCTOR
ARCHITECTURE OVERVIEW
1.1. PURPOSE OF
DESINGING
CONSTRUCTION
The project of the Goods Inspection Center of Hồ Chí Minh City was
established according to the current development trend of the city, located in the
central area to match the function and working efficiency of the building and to
answer adapting the city's economic growth rate as well as checking and inspecting
export and import of goods from neighboring ports into export processing zones and
industrial parks. This is level I construction (100-year sustainability, fire-resistant
level is II). Building height is 60.5 m (calculated from natural ground). Including 15
floors with a total area of 429m².
1.2. LOCATION AND FEATURES
1.2.1. Location of construction
- Scale : the building is located in District 3, Hồ Chí Minh city.
- Construction scale: Level I
- Floors: 15 floors.
- Land area: 684.61 m²
- Construction area: 429 m²
1.2.2. Natural condition
1.2.2.1. Climate
The climate of Hồ Chí Minh city is equatorial, so the temperature is high
and quite stable during the year. The average monthly sunshine hours reach
from 160 to 270 hours, the average air humidity is 79.5%.
1.3. ARCHITECTURE
OVERVIEW
1.3.1. Construction scale
1.3.1.1. Construction type
Civil construction level 1 according to “thông tư số 03/2016/DEAD-BXD
phụ lục 2”. Height of each floor is shown in Table 1.1:
PROJECT: GOODS INSPECTION CENTER
STUDENT: XXX
GRUADUATION THESIS
PAGE 5
INSTRUCTOR
Floor
Height
Floor
Height
Basement
-1.000m
Floor 9
+34.700m
Ground floor
+2.500m
Floor 10
+38.100m
Floor 1
+7.500m
Floor 11
+41.500m
Floor 2
+10.900m
Floor 12
+44.900m
Floor 3
+14.300m
Floor 13
+48.300m
Floor 4
+17.700m
Floor 14
+51.700m
Floor 5
+21.100m
Floor 15
+55.100m
Floor 6
+24.500m
Roof
+58.500m
Floor 7
+27.900m
Water tank
+60.500m
Floor 8
+31.300m
Table 1.1 Floors height
1.3.1.2. Construction height
The building is high 60.5m (calculated from natural ground: +0.000m)
1.3.2. Functional area
• Basement : parking area and technical room.
• Floor 1: laboratory.
• Floor 2 to floor 15: Offices
• Roof : water tank roof.
1.3.3. Internal traffic solution
Horizontal traffic in the building (each floor) is a combination of the corridor
and lobby system in the top-down smooth construction.
Standing traffic system is stair and elevator. The ground has a 3-ladder ladder to
do the task as well as the main way to escape. Elevators arranged 2 ladders are
placed in a position to ensure the longest distance to the staircase < 25m to solve
PROJECT: GOODS INSPECTION CENTER
STUDENT: XXX
GRUADUATION THESIS
PAGE 6
INSTRUCTOR
daily travel for everyone and a safe distance to escape quickly when the incident
occurs. .
1.4. ENGINEERING
SYSTEM
1.4.1. Power system
The power supply system is going in the technical box. Each floor has a table
that controls individual interference with the power supply for each section or area.
Automatic CB break areas to isolate the local power source when a problem occurs.
There is an emergency power supply for the area: emergency exit, emergency light,
fire pump, fire alarm and communication.
1.4.2. Water supply system
Water from the main water supply system of the city is put into the tank located
at the technical floor (basement) and the water is pumped directly to the tank to the
top floor, the control of the pumping process is carried out automatically. through
automatic float valve system. Water pipes are in the genome box.
1.4.3. Fire resistance system
Because of the concentration of people and high-rise buildings, fire prevention
is very important, arranged according to national standards. Automatic smoke and
heat alarms are arranged logically in each area.
1.5. STRUCTURE
SOLUTION FOR
BUILDING
Based on architectural requirements, column mesh, function of the project,
students choose the solution of the whole floor system, arranged orthogonal beams.
PROJECT: GOODS INSPECTION CENTER
STUDENT: XXX
GRUADUATION THESIS
PAGE 7
INSTRUCTOR
1.6. FOUNDATION
SOLUTION
For high-rise buildings, the effect on the big foundation next to it is also the soil
load applied to the foundation.
Deep foundation: bored pile foundation, Barret pile foundation, pre-cast reinforced
concrete pile foundation, prestressed centrifugal pile foundation.
With the facilities of the project as above students choose the solution of driven pile
foundation for the foundation solution of the project.
1.7. STRUCTURAL
DESIGN BASIC
1.7.1. Materials solution
1.7.1.1. Concrete and steel
We have concrete and steel feature of concrete is shown in Table 1.2 and Table 1.3
Num
1
Durable level
Performance
Concrete B25: Rb = 14.5 MPa
Ground floor, staircase,
Rbt = 1.05 MPa ; Eb = 30x103 Mpa
cylinder, wall, foundation,
Concrete B30: Rb = 17 MPa
column, beam, floor, water
Rbt = 1.2 MPa ; Eb = 32.5x103 Mpa
tank, staircase.
Plaster , mortar
Cement mortar, plastering
2
walls
Table 1.2 Concrete features
Nu
Steel type
m
1
2
Steel AI (d
10): Rs = Rsc = 225MPa
Rsw = 175 MPa ; Es = 2.1x105 MPa.
Steel AIII (d
10): Rs = Rsc = 365
PROJECT: GOODS INSPECTION CENTER
Performance
d
10 mm
d
10mm
STUDENT: XXX
GRUADUATION THESIS
PAGE 8
INSTRUCTOR
MPa
Rsw = 290 MPa ; Es = 20x105 MPa.
Table 1.3 Steel features
PROJECT: GOODS INSPECTION CENTER
STUDENT: XXX
GRUADUATION THESIS
PAGE 9
CHAPTER 2
INSTRUCTOR
DESIGN FLOOR 2-15
2.1. PLAN VIEW OF
FLOORS 2-15:
We have Beams arrangement floors plan 2-15 is in Table 2.1
Table 2.2 Structural plan of floors 2 - 15
2.2. DETERMINATION
OF SECTIONAL
DIMENSIONS :
2.2.1. Slab’s thickness:
Primarily determination of the slab’s thickness ( Vietnamese experience):
Select the biggest slab that has size :
PROJECT: GOODS INSPECTION CENTER
(S15)
STUDENT: XXX
GRUADUATION THESIS
In that:
PAGE 10
INSTRUCTOR
m = 30
35 for one-way slab (L2 ≥ 2L1)
m = 40
45 for two-way slab (L2 < 2L1)
: Length of the shorter dimension of the slab
D = 0.8
1.4 depend on loading magnitude
All the slabs are shown in Table 2.2 by using the formula:
Num
Slabs
Thickness
1
Slabs in typical flkoor (floor 2 to floor 15)
120
2
Toilet’s slabs
120
Table 2.3 Determination of the slabs’s thickness
2.2.2. Beam sections:
Primarily determination by this experienced formulas:
Main beam :
Beam’s heigLL:
Choose hmb = 700 mm
Beam’s width:
Choose bmb = 300 mm
Secondary beam :
Beam’s heigLL:
Choose hsb= 600 mm
Beam’s width:
Choose bsb = 200 mm
PROJECT: GOODS INSPECTION CENTER
STUDENT: XXX
GRUADUATION THESIS
PAGE 11
INSTRUCTOR
Use the same method for all slab we have the beam’s sections shown in Table 2.3:
Main beams
Size (bxh)
Size (bxh) Secondary beams
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
7000
300 x 700
7000
200 x 600
7500
300 x 700
7500
200 x 600
7800
300 x 700
7800
200 x 600
8000
300 x 700
8000
200 x 600
Table 2.4 Determination of beam sections
2.3. TYPES OF LOADS
Load applied on the slab include:
• Slab’s weigLL it self.
• Dead load depend on slab’s layers.
• Live load depend on slab’s performance.
2.3.1. Dead load of slab’s layers
We have the parameters of dead load by slab’s layers according to “TCVN 55742012 section 4.3.3” is shown in Table 2.5 and Table 2.4:
Slab
Type
gtc
Layers
(m)
(kN/m3
(kN/m2
)
)
gDEAD
n
(kN/m2)
Slab of
Ceramic brick
0.01
20
0.20
1.1
0.22
office,
Floor plaster
0.03
18
0.63
1.3
0.82
lobby,
balcony
5
Reinforced concrete
0.12
25
3.00
1.1
3.3
Ceiling plaster
0.02
18
0.36
1.3
0.47
System engineering
-
-
0.50
1.2
0.6
Summary
4.69
5.41
Table 2.5 Dead load by slab’s layers for hallway,balcony
Slab
Layers
PROJECT: GOODS INSPECTION CENTER
gtc
n
gDEAD
STUDENT: XXX
GRUADUATION THESIS
PAGE 12
Type
(m)
Ceramic brick
INSTRUCTOR
(kN/m3) (kN/m2)
0.01
20
0.2
(kN/m2)
1.
0.22
1
Floor plaster
0.05
18
0.90
1.
1.17
3
Waterproof layer
Slab of
toilet
-
-
0.02
1.
0.026
3
Reinforced concrete
0.12
25
3.00
1.
3.3
1
Ceiling plaster
0.02
18
0.36
1.
0.47
3
System engineering
-
-
0.5
1.
0.6
2
Summary
4.98
5.79
Table 2.6 Dead load by slab’s layers for toilet
To simply the calculation, we convert the equivalent for slab has two performance
(S44) like this:
2.3.2. Live load
Live load’s values is based on the performance of slab. The reliability
coefficient “n” for the distributed load is determined according from the article
“4.3.3 TCVN 2737- 1995”:
When ptc < 2( kN/m2) => n = 1.3.
When ptc ≥ 2 (kN/m2) => n = 1.2.
We have the parameters of live load by slab’s performance is shown in Table 2.6 :
Num
1
Slab
performance
Standard values (kN/m2)
Long section
Ladder, lobby, hallway
PROJECT: GOODS INSPECTION CENTER
term
1
Totality
3
Load
n
kN/m2
1.20
3.6
STUDENT: XXX
GRUADUATION THESIS
PAGE 13
INSTRUCTOR
2
Rest room
0.3
1.5
1.30
1.95
3
Balcony
0.7
2
1.20
2.4
4
Toilet
0.3
1.5
1.30
1.95
5
Office
1
2
1.20
2.4
Table 2.6 Live load
If the slab has two or more performances, then pDEAD is calculated by converting
equivalent according to the formula:
In design, only slab “S44” has two performances ( toilet and hallway). So we
calculate the equivalent load conversion for this slab like this:
We have all the design loads is shown in Table 2.7:
Size
Sla
Design load
Dead
Live
Dead load
load
load
+ live load
L1
L2
mm
mm
kN/m2
kN/m2
kN/m2
S1
3350
3900
5.79
3.6
9.39
1.16
Two-way slab
S2
3350
4100
5.79
3.6
9.39
1.22
Two-way slab
S3
3350
3500
5.79
3.6
9.39
1.04
Two-way slab
S4
3350
3500
5.79
3.6
9.39
1.04
Two-way slab
S5
3350
3750
5.79
2.4
8.19
1.12
Two-way slab
S6
3350
3750
5.79
2.4
8.19
1.12
Two-way slab
S7
3350
4650
5.79
2.4
8.19
1.39
Two-way slab
S8
3350
3350
5.41
1.95
7.36
1.00
Two-way slab
S9
3900
4150
5.79
3.6
9.39
1.06
Two-way slab
S10
4100
4150
5.79
3.6
9.39
1.01
Two-way slab
b
PROJECT: GOODS INSPECTION CENTER
Slab type
STUDENT: XXX
GRUADUATION THESIS
PAGE 14
Size
INSTRUCTOR
Design load
Dead
Live
Dead load
load
load
+ live load
mm
kN/m2
kN/m2
kN/m2
3500
4150
5.79
2.4
8.19
1.19
Two-way slab
S12
3500
4150
5.79
2.4
8.19
1.19
Two-way slab
S13
3750
4150
5.79
2.4
8.19
1.11
Two-way slab
S14
3750
4150
5.79
2.4
8.19
1.11
Two-way slab
S15
4150
4650
5.79
2.4
8.19
1.12
Two-way slab
S16
3350
4150
5.41
1.95
7.36
1.24
Two-way slab
S17
3900
3900
5.79
3.6
9.39
1.00
Two-way slab
S18
3900
4100
5.79
3.6
9.39
1.05
Two-way slab
S19
S20
S21
S22
S23
S24
S25
S26
S27
S28
S29
S30
S31
S32
S33
S34
S35
S36
S37
S38
S39
S40
S41
3500
3500
3750
3750
3900
3350
3900
3900
3500
3500
3750
3750
3900
3350
3550
3550
3500
3500
3550
3550
3550
3350
3450
3900
3900
3900
3900
4650
3900
3900
4100
3900
3900
3900
3900
4650
3900
3900
4100
3550
3550
3750
3750
4650
3550
3900
5.79
5.79
5.79
5.79
5.79
5.79
5.79
5.79
5.79
5.79
5.79
5.79
5.79
5.79
5.79
5.79
5.79
5.79
5.79
5.79
5.79
5.79
5.79
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
2.4
2.4
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
2.4
2.4
1.95
1.95
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
2.4
2.4
1.95
9.39
9.39
9.39
9.39
8.19
8.19
9.39
9.39
9.39
9.39
9.39
9.39
8.19
8.19
7.74
7.74
9.39
9.39
9.39
9.39
8.19
8.19
7.74
1.11
1.11
1.04
1.04
1.19
1.16
1.00
1.05
1.11
1.11
1.04
1.04
1.19
1.16
1.10
1.15
1.01
1.01
1.06
1.06
1.31
1.06
1.13
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Sla
L1
L2
mm
S11
b
PROJECT: GOODS INSPECTION CENTER
Slab type
STUDENT: XXX
GRUADUATION THESIS
PAGE 15
Size
Sla
b
S42
S43
S44
S45
S46
S47
INSTRUCTOR
Design load
L1
L2
mm
3450
1950
3450
3450
3450
3450
mm
4100
1950
3550
3750
3750
4650
Dead
Live
Dead load
load
load
+ live load
kN/m2
5.79
5.79
5.59
5.41
5.79
5.79
kN/m2
1.95
3.6
2.78
1.95
2.4
2.4
kN/m2
7.74
9.39
8.37
7.36
8.19
8.19
Slab type
1.19
1.00
1.03
1.09
1.09
1.35
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Two-way slab
Table 2.7 Total load on slabs
2.4. SLAB’S STEEL
CALCULATION
2.4.1. Steel calculation of two-way slab
We calculate the slab with biggest size: S15 (4.15m x4.65m)
We have S15 is a two-way slab ( definited before ).
We have
so this slab has 4 fixed supports.
2.4.1.1. Determination of slab’s distributed load
We have moment for slab number 9 (4 fixed supports) in Table 2.8
PROJECT: GOODS INSPECTION CENTER
STUDENT: XXX
GRUADUATION THESIS
PAGE 16
INSTRUCTOR
M
7.19I
M2
M2
M2
q = 8.19 kN/m2
L1
b=1m
q2
M2
4150
3.11
M2
MI
7.19
qq1= 8.19 kN/m
5.73MII
2
M5.73
II
M2
L2
4650
2.48
Table 2.8 Moment calculation for slab number 9
Moment at the mid-span :
Along short dimension (L1):
(kNm/m)
Along long dimension (L2):
(kNm/m)
Moment at the supports :
Along short dimension (L1):
(kNm/m)
Along long dimension (L2):
(kNm/m)
We have:
: are the coefficients that look up the table according to
the book “ Kết cấu bê tông cốt thép” of Võ Bá Tầm.
PROJECT: GOODS INSPECTION CENTER
STUDENT: XXX
GRUADUATION THESIS
PAGE 17
INSTRUCTOR
2.4.1.2. Reinforcement calculation
Cut a strip wide 1m by each side, then calculate and arrange steel evenly for the
slab .
Base
on
durability
level
of
concrete
grade
B25,
definite
the
ratio
for reinforcement group AI and
for
reinforcement group AIII
Assume that the distance from the reinforced concrete edge to the center of tensile
reinforcement group is:
Steel ratio :
for reinforcement group AI
for reinforcement group AIII
•Calculating reinforcement in short dimension L1
At the supporters
Working heig
LL of section :
Reinforcement section:
Choose
,
Checking steel ratio :
PROJECT: GOODS INSPECTION CENTER
STUDENT: XXX
GRUADUATION THESIS
PAGE 18
INSTRUCTOR
=> Eligible.
At the mid-span
Working heigLL of section :
Reinforcement section:
Choose
,
Checking steel ratio :
Eligible.
• Calculating reinforcement in long dimension L2
At the supporters
Working heigLL of section :
Reinforcement section:
Choose
,
PROJECT: GOODS INSPECTION CENTER
STUDENT: XXX
GRUADUATION THESIS
PAGE 19
INSTRUCTOR
Checking steel ratio :
Eligible.
At the mid-span
Working heigLL of section :
Reinforcement section:
Choose
,
Checking steel ratio :
Eligible.
Use the same method for other slabs, we have Table 2.9 :
Slab
Moments
(kN.m/m)
S1
M1
2.5
M2
MI
1.8
5.7
Caculalte reinforcement
Ads
αm
ζ
(mm2/m)
0.01
9
0.01
6
0.04
4
0.019
111
0.016
0.045
87
258
PROJECT: GOODS INSPECTION CENTER
φ
Arrange reinforcement
a
As
Ratio
(mm)
(mm)
6
200
6
200
8
190
(mm2/m)
(%)
141
0.141
141
265
0.141
0.265
STUDENT: XXX
GRUADUATION THESIS
Slab
Moments
(kN.m/m)
S2
S3
S4
S5
MII
4.2
M1
2.6
M2
1.8
MI
6.1
MII
4.1
M1
2.1
M2
1.9
MI
4.8
MII
4.4
M1
2.1
M2
1.9
MI
4.8
MII
4.4
M1
2.0
M2
1.6
MI
4.7
MII
3.7
M1
M2
2.0
1.6
S6
PAGE 20
Caculalte reinforcement
Ads
αm
ζ
(mm2/m)
0.03
2
0.02
0
0.01
5
0.04
7
0.03
1
0.01
6
0.01
6
0.03
7
0.03
4
0.01
6
0.01
6
0.03
7
0.03
4
0.01
6
0.01
4
0.03
6
0.02
9
0.01
6
0.01
0.033
190
0.020
119
0.015
84
0.048
277
0.032
183
0.016
92
0.016
90
0.037
216
0.034
198
0.016
92
0.016
90
0.037
216
0.034
198
0.016
91
0.014
77
0.037
212
0.029
168
0.016
0.014
91
77
PROJECT: GOODS INSPECTION CENTER
INSTRUCTOR
φ
Arrange reinforcement
a
As
Ratio
(mm)
(mm)
8
200
6
200
6
200
8
180
8
200
6
200
6
200
8
200
8
200
6
200
6
200
8
200
8
200
6
200
6
200
8
200
8
200
6
200
6
200
(mm2/m)
(%)
250
0.250
141
0.141
141
0.141
279
0.279
250
0.250
141
0.141
141
0.141
250
0.250
250
0.250
141
0.141
141
0.141
250
0.250
250
0.250
141
0.141
141
0.141
250
0.250
250
0.250
141
141
0.141
0.141
STUDENT: XXX
GRUADUATION THESIS
Slab
Moments
(kN.m/m)
S7
MI
4.7
MII
3.7
M1
2.7
M2
1.4
MI
6.0
MII
M1
3.1
1.5
M2
1.5
MI
3.4
MII
3.4
M1
2.9
M2
2.5
MI
6.7
MII
5.9
M1
2.9
M2
2.8
MI
6.7
MII
6.6
S8
S9
S10
PAGE 21
Caculalte reinforcement
Ads
αm
ζ
(mm2/m)
4
0.03
6
0.02
9
0.02
0
0.01
2
0.04
6
0.02
4
0.011
0.01
3
0.02
6
0.02
6
0.02
2
0.02
2
0.05
1
0.04
5
0.02
2
0.02
5
0.05
2
0.05
0
0.037
212
0.029
168
0.021
120
0.012
66
0.047
275
0.024
0.011
141
66
0.013
71
0.026
155
0.026
155
0.022
130
0.022
122
0.051
305
0.045
269
0.022
130
0.025
136
0.052
308
0.050
300
PROJECT: GOODS INSPECTION CENTER
INSTRUCTOR
φ
Arrange reinforcement
a
As
Ratio
(mm)
(mm)
8
200
8
200
6
200
6
200
8
180
8
200
6
200
6
200
8
200
8
200
6
200
6
200
8
160
8
190
6
200
6
200
8
160
8
160
(mm2/m)
(%)
250
0.250
250
0.250
141
0.141
141
0.141
279
0.279
250
141
0.250
0.141
141
0.141
250
0.250
250
0.250
141
0.141
141
0.141
314
0.314
265
0.265
141
0.141
141
0.141
314
0.314
314
0.314
STUDENT: XXX
GRUADUATION THESIS
Slab
Moments
(kN.m/m)
S11
S12
S13
S14
M1
2.4
M2
1.7
MI
5.6
MII
3.9
M1
2.4
M2
1.7
MI
5.6
MII
3.9
M1
2.5
M2
2.0
MI
5.8
MII
4.7
M1
2.5
M2
2.0
MI
5.8
MII
4.7
M1
3.1
M2
MI
2.5
7.2
S15
PAGE 22
Caculalte reinforcement
Ads
αm
ζ
(mm2/m)
0.01
8
0.01
5
0.04
3
0.03
0
0.01
8
0.01
5
0.04
3
0.03
0
0.01
9
0.01
8
0.04
4
0.03
6
0.01
9
0.01
8
0.04
4
0.03
6
0.02
4
0.02
1
0.05
0.018
108
0.015
82
0.043
252
0.030
178
0.018
108
0.015
82
0.043
252
0.030
178
0.019
112
0.018
97
0.044
262
0.036
213
0.019
112
0.018
97
0.044
262
0.036
213
0.024
140
0.021
0.055
118
329
PROJECT: GOODS INSPECTION CENTER
INSTRUCTOR
φ
Arrange reinforcement
a
As
Ratio
(mm)
(mm)
6
200
6
200
8
190
8
200
6
200
6
200
8
190
8
200
6
200
6
200
8
190
8
200
6
200
6
200
8
190
8
200
6
200
6
200
8
150
(mm2/m)
(%)
141
0.141
141
0.141
265
0.265
250
0.250
141
0.141
141
0.141
265
0.265
250
0.250
141
0.141
141
0.141
265
0.250
250
0.250
141
0.141
141
0.141
265
0.250
250
0.250
141
0.141
141
335
0.141
0.335
STUDENT: XXX
GRUADUATION THESIS
Slab
Moments
(kN.m/m)
S16
S17
S18
S19
S20
MII
5.7
M1
2.1
M2
1.4
MI
4.8
MII
3.1
M1
2.6
M2
2.6
MI
6.0
MII
6.0
M1
2.8
M2
2.6
MI
6.5
MII
5.9
M1
2.5
M2
2.0
MI
5.8
MII
M1
4.7
2.5
PAGE 23
Caculalte reinforcement
Ads
αm
ζ
(mm2/m)
5
0.04
4
0.01
6
0.01
2
0.03
7
0.02
4
0.02
0
0.02
2
0.04
6
0.04
6
0.02
2
0.02
2
0.05
0
0.04
5
0.01
9
0.01
8
0.04
5
0.03
6
0.01
9
0.044
260
0.016
94
0.012
65
0.037
219
0.024
142
0.020
115
0.022
123
0.046
271
0.046
271
0.022
127
0.022
122
0.050
299
0.045
269
0.019
113
0.018
97
0.045
264
0.036
0.019
212
113
PROJECT: GOODS INSPECTION CENTER
INSTRUCTOR
φ
Arrange reinforcement
a
As
Ratio
(mm)
(mm)
8
190
6
6
8
8
6
6
8
8
6
6
8
8
6
6
8
8
6
(mm2/m)
(%)
265
0.250
200
141
0.141
200
141
0.141
200
250
0.250
200
250
0.250
200
141
0.141
200
141
0.141
180
279
0.279
180
279
0.279
200
141
0.141
200
141
0.141
160
314
0.314
180
279
0.279
200
141
0.141
200
141
0.141
190
265
0.265
200
200
250
141
0.250
0.141
STUDENT: XXX
GRUADUATION THESIS
Slab
Moments
(kN.m/m)
S21
S22
S23
M2
2.0
MI
5.8
MII
4.7
M1
2.6
M2
2.4
MI
5.9
MII
5.5
M1
2.6
M2
2.4
MI
5.9
MII
5.5
M1
3.0
M2
2.1
MI
6.9
MII
4.9
M1
2.2
M2
1.6
MI
MII
5.0
3.7
S24
PAGE 24
Caculalte reinforcement
Ads
αm
ζ
(mm2/m)
0.01
8
0.04
5
0.03
6
0.02
0
0.02
0
0.04
5
0.04
2
0.02
0
0.02
0
0.04
5
0.04
2
0.02
3
0.01
8
0.05
3
0.03
7
0.01
6
0.01
4
0.03
8
0.02
0.018
97
0.045
264
0.036
212
0.020
115
0.020
113
0.045
270
0.042
249
0.020
115
0.020
113
0.045
270
0.042
249
0.023
136
0.018
101
0.053
317
0.037
221
0.016
96
0.014
76
0.038
0.028
225
165
PROJECT: GOODS INSPECTION CENTER
INSTRUCTOR
φ
(mm)
6
8
8
6
6
8
8
6
6
8
8
6
6
8
8
6
6
8
8
Arrange reinforcement
a
As
Ratio
(mm)
(mm2/m)
200
141
0.141
190
265
0.265
200
250
0.250
200
141
0.141
200
141
0.141
180
279
0.279
200
250
0.250
200
141
0.141
200
141
0.141
180
279
0.279
200
250
0.250
200
141
0.141
200
141
0.141
150
335
0.335
200
250
0.250
200
141
0.141
200
141
0.141
200
200
250
250
0.250
0.250
(%)
STUDENT: XXX
GRUADUATION THESIS
Slab
Moments
(kN.m/m)
S25
S26
S27
S28
M1
2.6
M2
2.6
MI
6.0
MII
6.0
M1
2.8
M2
2.6
MI
6.5
MII
5.9
M1
2.6
M2
2.1
MI
5.9
MII
4.8
M1
2.6
M2
2.1
MI
5.9
MII
4.8
M1
M2
2.6
2.4
S29
PAGE 25
Caculalte reinforcement
Ads
αm
ζ
(mm2/m)
8
0.02
0
0.02
2
0.04
6
0.04
6
0.02
2
0.02
2
0.05
0
0.04
5
0.01
9
0.01
8
0.04
5
0.03
6
0.01
9
0.01
8
0.04
5
0.03
6
0.02
0
0.02
0
0.020
115
0.022
123
0.046
271
0.046
271
0.022
127
0.022
122
0.050
299
0.045
269
0.019
113
0.018
97
0.045
264
0.036
212
0.019
113
0.018
97
0.045
264
0.036
212
0.020
0.020
115
113
PROJECT: GOODS INSPECTION CENTER
INSTRUCTOR
φ
(mm)
6
6
8
8
6
6
8
8
6
6
8
8
6
6
8
8
6
6
Arrange reinforcement
a
As
Ratio
(mm)
(mm2/m)
200
141
0.141
200
141
0.141
180
279
0.279
180
279
0.279
200
141
0.141
200
141
0.141
160
314
0.314
180
279
0.279
200
141
0.141
200
141
0.141
180
279
0.279
200
250
0.250
200
141
0.141
200
141
0.141
180
279
0.279
200
250
0.250
200
200
141
141
0.141
0.141
(%)
STUDENT: XXX