Tải bản đầy đủ (.pdf) (6 trang)

Study of the autocatalytic chlorate–triiodide reaction in acidic and neutral media

Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (430.39 KB, 6 trang )

Journal of Advanced Research (2010) 1, 209–214

Cairo University

Journal of Advanced Research

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Study of the autocatalytic chlorate–triiodide reaction in
acidic and neutral media
Ahmad M. Mohammad a,b , Mohamed I. Awad a,b , Takeo Ohsaka a,∗
a

Department of Electronic Chemistry, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Science and Engineering,
Tokyo Institute of Technology, Mail Box G 1-5, 4259 Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-8502, Japan
b
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, P.O. 12613, Giza, Egypt
Received 9 March 2009; received in revised form 23 November 2009; accepted 6 December 2009
Available online 11 June 2010

KEYWORDS
Chlorate;
Iodine;
Spectrophotometry;
Clock reaction;
Oxidation

Abstract The oxidation reaction of triiodide, I3 − , by chlorate is investigated in a slightly acidic and
neutral media. The reaction was verified and monitored both potentiometrically and spectrophotometrically.
Generally, a slow linear decay preceded by an induction period was observed for the triiodide concentration
following the addition of chlorate. The induction period is likely to be related to the time required for


the generation of suitable concentrations of plausible intermediates (HIO and HIO2 ), which are assumed
to auto-catalyse the reaction. We examined the effect of acidity and concentrations of both chlorate and
triiodide on the induction time for this reaction. The acidity of the medium influenced the induction period,
while the oxidation of iodide by chlorate competed with that of iodine as the medium acidity increased,
making the reaction more complicated. Therefore, a suitable pH is highly recommended for studying the
chlorate–triiodide reaction. A plausible mechanism involving the HIO, HIO2 , and I2 O species is proposed.
© 2010 Cairo University. All rights reserved.

Introduction
Since the pioneering work of Bray and Liebhafsky (BL) on the
oscillation reaction of iodine and hydrogen peroxide, the oxidation
reaction of iodine to iodate has received significant attention [1–5].



Corresponding author. Tel.: +81 45 924 5404; fax: +81 45 924 5489.
E-mail addresses: (A.M. Mohammad),
(M.I. Awad),
(T. Ohsaka).
2090-1232 © 2010 Cairo University. Production and hosting by Elsevier. All
rights reserved. Peer review under responsibility of Cairo University.

Production and hosting by Elsevier

doi:10.1016/j.jare.2010.05.003

Several other oscillation reactions have since been proposed; these
include the Briggs–Rauscher reaction, in which the acidic oxidation of malonic acid by a mixture of hydrogen peroxide and iodate
is catalysed by manganous ion [6], and those based on chlorite [7]
and bromite [8] – iodide reactions. Many of these reactions have also

shown a clock behaviour, in which an abrupt change in the concentration of some chemical species occurs after an induction period.
Recently, a clock behaviour has been observed in a highly acidic
medium for a reaction involving chlorate, which suggests the possibility of new chlorate-based oscillation reactions [9]. Although they
exhibit a complicated dynamic behaviour, oscillation reactions are
still attracting considerable interest due to their unique importance
throughout the entire spectrum of science and engineering [10–12].
Our group has for some time investigated the oxidation reactions
of iodide by several important oxidants, including ozone, hydrogen
peroxide, hypochlorite ions and peroxyacetic acid [13–15]. Indeed,
the oxidation of iodide has served as the basis for the analysis of
several oxidants [16,17]. In this paper, a clock reaction based on


210

A.M. Mohammad et al.

the oxidation of triiodide, I3 − , by chlorate in slightly acidic and
neutral media is presented. Iodine oxidation by hydrogen peroxide
has been previously studied, but this has mainly been in a highly
acidic media and in the presence of IO3 − [18,19]. The absence of
high acidity resulted in no oxidation, as previously stated by Bray
[1]. Without iodate the reaction could start, but an induction period
long enough to permit some iodate formation preceded it [3]. In
the current study, we found that chlorate could oxidise triiodide not
only in a slightly acidic media but also in a neutral media. The effect
of pH and the concentrations of both chlorate and triiodide on the
reaction behaviour were also investigated. A plausible mechanism
explaining the nature and steps of this reaction is proposed.
Experimental

All solutions were prepared in deionised water (Milli-Q, Millipore,
Japan) and all chemicals were of analytical grade. Sodium chlorate
(99.0%) was purchased from Kanto Chemicals Co., Inc., Japan. To
prepare a potential buffer solution, iodine was generated electrochemically in a buffered solution containing excess amount of I− .
Based on the high I− concentration used in this investigation, iodine
existed mainly as I3 − . However, there would still have been a small
amount of I2 according to the following equilibrium:
I− + I2 ↔ I3 − .

(1)

In the electrochemical measurements, a platinum electrode
(1.6 mm in diameter) was used as the indicator electrode. The surface of the indicator electrode was polished with a fine emery paper
and then with aqueous slurries of successively fine alumina powder (down to 0.06 ␮m) and then sonicated in an ultrasonic bath for
10 min. The electrode potential was measured versus Ag/AgCl/Cl−
(KCl sat.) and a Pt spiral was used as a counter-electrode. The
electrochemical measurements were performed using a 100 B/W
electrochemical analyser (Bioanalytical Systems, Inc.). In the spectrophotometric measurements, a UV–vis spectrophotometer V-550
(JASCO, Co.) was used.
Results and discussion

A preliminary investigation of the chlorate–triiodide reaction was
carried out using a potentiometric method in which a Pt electrode
was used as an indicator electrode and the I3 − /I− redox couple was
used as a potential buffer at a pH of 3.2. The reaction progress
was estimated based on the change in the open circuit potential of
the indicator electrode that resulted when chlorate reacted with the
I3 − /I− potential buffer. It is worth mentioning here that the reaction
of chlorate and iodide should be excluded under this condition of low
acidity, since a highly acidic medium (which sometimes reaches to

12 M) is required for this reaction to proceed [20–27]. Interestingly,
the potentiometric approach we used is capable of distinguishing
between the reactions that consume and/or produce iodine. The following Nernstian equation was developed to estimate the change in
potential, E, when an oxidant, Ox, gains two electrons in the oxidation of I− at 25 ◦ C under the condition of the initial concentration
of iodide, [I− ]o , being much greater than that of the oxidant [Ox]:

where [I3 − ]o is the initial concentration of I3 − .

The positive change in the open circuit potential, E, of the indicator electrode is direct evidence for iodide consumption or iodine
production; a negative E is evidence of iodine consumption or
iodide production. Since a high concentration of iodide was used in
this study, the change in the iodide concentration would be negligible and the change in E would simply be related to the change in
the iodine concentration. Fig. 1 shows the potential change which
occurred when NaClO3 (10 mM) was added to 0.05 M acetate buffer
(pH 3.2) containing 10 mM KI and 12 ␮M I2 . A potential increase
of 7.7 mV is expected by Eq. (1) if the reaction between NaClO3
and I− is completed. Surprisingly, instead of increasing, the potential remained constant for a period of ∼100 s and then decreased
slowly. It worth mentioning that similar but shorter induction periods for the reaction of chlorate and iodine in highly acidic solutions
have previously been observed [9]. The decrease in potential sustains
the consumption of I2 (in other words iodine oxidation) as inferred
from Eq. (1). Following this result, we sought another technique to
investigate the oxidation reaction of iodine by chlorate.
Spectrophotometric investigation

Potentiometric investigation

E mV = 29.6 log {(1 + [Ox]/[I−
3 ]o )},

Fig. 1 The potential change due to the reaction of 10 mM NaClO3 to

0.05 M acetate buffer (pH 3.2) containing 10 mM KI and 12 ␮M I2 . The
arrow indicates the addition of NaClO3 solution to the acetate buffer.

(2)

Spectrophotometric techniques have proven ideal for studying the
reactions of iodine. We decided to keep the iodide in the spectrophotometric measurements in a high concentration so as to compare with
the aforementioned potentiometric results and later potentiometric
applications. Henceforth, we will talk about the spectrum of I3 −
not I2 . Fig. 2 depicts the immediate change in the spectrum of I3 −
after the addition of chlorate ions. In agreement with the results of
Nowack and Von Gunten [23], two peaks at 288 and 352 nm were
identified for I3 − in a 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB) (pH 7) containing
10 mM KI and 0.1 mM I3 − (Fig. 2a). The intensity of these peaks
decreased significantly, as shown in Fig. 2b, after the addition of
1.36 ml of 0.5 M NaClO3 to 5 ml of 0.1 M PB containing 10 mM KI
and 0.1 mM I3 − . The large decrease in the peak intensities is likely
due to the high concentration of ClO3 − added. This confirms the
existence of a reaction between I3 − and chlorate under the described
conditions. Interestingly, the intensity of the peaks decreased gradually with the concentration of chlorate, which is very useful for
chlorate analysis. A similar approach – but based on the oxidation of indigo carmine by chlorate ions in an acidic solution – has
recently been reported for chlorate determination [28]. The change


Chlorate-triiodide reaction

Fig. 2 The I3 − spectra in a 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7) containing
10 mM KI and 0.1 mM I3 − (a) and after the addition of 1.36 ml of 0.5 M
NaClO3 to 5 ml of the same buffered solution (b).


of I3 − spectrum was also monitored with time as shown in Fig. 3.
A volume of 1.36 ml of 0.5 M NaClO3 was added to 5 ml of 0.1 M
PB containing 10 mM KI and 0.1 mM I3 − , and the spectra were
recorded at various intervals. The intensity of the peaks decreased
slightly after 15 min (curve b), probably due to the slow initial rate
of this reaction. An induction period may also be associated with
this 15 min period. After 70 min (curve c), the intensities decreased
significantly and continued until almost saturation (no I3 − ) after 92 h
(curve g). The change in absorbance with time at 352 nm appears
exponential, as the inset of Fig. 3 shows. At this point it is worth
commenting on the induction period we observed in Fig. 1 at pH
3.2. We believe changing the pH and chlorate concentration may
affect the induction period [9]. Therefore, recording the change in
absorbance with time in neutral media is expected to result in a
longer induction period. That is very much what we observed when
40 ␮l of 0.5 M NaClO3 was mixed with 5 ml of 0.1 M PB containing
10 mM KI, 0.1 mM I3 − and the absorbance of this solution was measured simultaneously with time at 352 nm, as shown in Fig. 4. An
induction period of ∼8 min was observed before a linear decay that
continued for about 3 h. That is why the peak intensities decreased

Fig. 3 The I3 − spectra after various periods (0 min (a), 15 min (b),
70 min (c), 130 min (d), 190 min (e), 960 min (f), 92 h (g)) from the
addition of 1.36 ml of 0.5 M NaClO3 to 5 ml of 0.1 M phosphate buffer
(pH 7) containing 10 mM KI and 0.1 mM I3 − . Inset represents the change
in absorbance with time at 352 nm for the same solution.

211

Fig. 4 The absorbance change of I3 − with time at 352 nm after the
addition of 40 ␮l of 0.5 M NaClO3 to 5 ml of 0.1 M phosphate buffer

containing 10 mM KI, 0.1 mM I3 − . Inset is a magnification for the part
retaining the induction period.

little within 15 min in Fig. 3, since there may be a certain induction
time as well.
Effect of pH on the reaction
The effect of pH on the chlorate–triiodide reaction and the associated induction period was further investigated. In Fig. 5, the change
in the absorbance of I3 − with time is depicted at 352 nm after the
addition of 1 ␮l of 10 mM NaClO3 to 3 ml of a solution containing
10 mM KI and 10 ␮M I3 − at different pHs. Curve a in Fig. 5, measured in a phosphate buffer at pH 7.2, shows an induction period of
∼16 min. If compared with Fig. 4, the increase in the induction time
is likely due to the large decrease in the concentration of triiodide.
We will show later how the changes in the triiodide concentration
can affect the induction time. Decreasing the pH resulted in a significant decrease in the induction time, as shown in curves b (4 min –
measured in phosphate buffer at pH 4.47) and c (2 min – measured

Fig. 5 Effect of pH on the induction period and the kinetics of the
triiodide–chlorate reaction. The absorbance change of I3 − in 10 mM KI
was recorded at 352 nm with time [ClO3 − ] = 3.3 ␮M; [I3 − ] = 10 ␮M; pH
(phosphate buffer) = 7.2 (a – green), 4.47 (b – red), 2.52 (c – black); curve
(d – blue) was measured in 0.1 M H2 SO4 . The inset is a magnification
of the initial stages of reaction. (For interpretation of the references to
color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of
the article.)


212

A.M. Mohammad et al.


in phosphate buffer at pH 2.52) in Fig. 5. The absorbance decay
next to the induction period in curve b is steeper than in curve a,
which means the increase in the H+ ions concentration enhanced
the reaction. However, when the concentration of H+ ions increased
more, the overall rate of triiodide consumption re-decreased again,
as shown in curve c in Fig. 5. One possible reason for this behaviour
is the increase in the rate of iodide oxidation following the increase
in the concentration of H+ ions. Although comparatively slow, the
iodide oxidation by chlorate at a pH of 2.52 cannot be totally ignored.
Therefore, one should then consider two parallel reactions; a reaction that consumes triiodide (the oxidation of triiodide) and another
that produces triiodide (the oxidation of iodide). Unfortunately, in
both reactions chlorate is going to be the oxidant, and therefore the
reaction becomes more complicated to the extent that one can hardly
predict which reaction is favoured. If our assumption is true, then if
the pH decreases beyond 2.52, one should expect a slower decay in
the absorbance of triiodide than in curve c. To investigate this, the
reaction was repeated in 0.1 M H2 SO4 . This decay is represented
in curve d in Fig. 5. As can be seen, the reaction has become more
complicated and four regions can be easily identified. In this case,
there was no induction and instead there was a little increase (first
region) in the absorbance at the beginning, for about 33 min. Following this was a sharp decrease in the absorbance (second region).
The absorbance then increased again in a third region and finally
decreased slowly as expected. The decay rate in the fourth region in
curve d is much slower than that in curve c, which may support our
assumption that with decreasing pH a slower decay can be expected
as a result of the controlling of the net reaction by two opposing
reactions, i.e., iodide and triiodide oxidation. The slight increase
in the absorbance of triiodide in the first region in curve d means
that the rate of iodide oxidation is favoured over that of triiodide.
Nowack and Von Gunten [23] have reported that chlorate is able

to oxidise iodide to iodine in highly acidic media according to the
following equation:
6I− + ClO3 − + 6H+ → 3I2 + Cl− + 3H2 O.

(3)

At present we cannot assign the new regions that appeared in
curve d. At this lower pH, many iodine and chlorine-containing
species may exist and it becomes very difficult to predict the reaction. We have repeated the same experiment as seen in curve d at
three other concentrations of chlorate and the same trend was reproduced. Understanding the details of the reaction in highly acidic
media will need further investigation. However, based on our results,
a moderate pH between 2.52 and 7.2 is highly recommended for
studying the chlorate–triiodide reaction.

Fig. 6 Effect of chlorate concentration on the induction period and
kinetics of the triiodide–chlorate reaction. The absorbance change of
I3 − in 10 mM KI was recorded at 352 nm with time [I3 − ] = 10 ␮M;
pH (phosphate buffer) = 4.47; [ClO3 − ] = 3.3 (a-red), 10 (b-green), and
30 ␮M (c-blue). (For interpretation of the references to color in this
figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of the article.)

reaction with chlorate concentration is likely behind the induction
elongation.
Effect of triiodide concentration on the triiodide–chlorate reaction
Three ␮L of 10 mM NaClO3 was added to a bottle containing 3 ml
of phosphate buffered solution (pH 4.47) containing 10 mM KI
and (curve a) 10 ␮M (curve b) 3.33 ␮M, and (curve c) 1.85 ␮M
I3 − . The absorbance of each bottle was recorded at 352 nm; this
is shown in Fig. 7. A significant decrease in the induction period
can be observed with the increase in the triiodide concentration;

further, the overall rate increases as well. It can also be seen that
when the concentration of triiodide becomes much less than that
of chlorate, the oxidation reaction of triiodide takes place in two
different steps at two different rates. This behaviour and the effect
of iodide concentration are going to be deeply investigated in future
work.

Effect of chlorate concentration on the reaction
We also studied the effect of chlorate concentration on the
triiodide–chlorate reaction at pH 4.47. Volumes of 1, 3, and 9 ␮L
of 10 mM NaClO3 were individually added to 3 ml of a phosphate
buffered solution (pH 4.47) containing 10 mM KI and 10 ␮M I3 − and
the absorbance at 352 nm was recorded. This is shown in Fig. 6. No
change in the absorbance occurred for iodine-containing PB without
adding chlorate. As can be seen in Fig. 6, a considerable decrease in
the initial absorbance occurred with the increase in chlorate concentration. This finding may be useful for chlorate analysis. It is also
clear in this graph that the induction time increases and the decay rate
of I3 − decreases with the concentration of chlorate. Liebhafsky et
al. have also observed a decrease in the reaction rate with hydrogen
peroxide concentration in case of the reaction of iodine and hydrogen peroxide [19]. The decrease in the rate of the triiodide–chlorate

Fig. 7 Effect of triiodide concentration on the induction period and
kinetics of the triiodide–chlorate reaction. The absorbance change of I3 −
in 10 mM KI was recorded at 352 nm with time [ClO3 − ] = 10 ␮M; pH
(phosphate buffer) = 4.47; [I3 − ] = 10 (a-red), 3.33 (b-blue), and 1.85 ␮M
(c-green). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure
legend, the reader is referred to the web version of the article.)


Chlorate-triiodide reaction


213

Mechanism of triiodide–chlorate reaction
The mechanism of the reaction of chlorate and iodine is not, to this
stage, fully understood. Previously, it was assumed that ClO3 − reacts
with I− produced from the hydrolysis of I2 to form HIO [9]. The
hypoiodous acid reacts further with chlorate to produce HIO2 , which
reacts next with chlorate to produce iodate, IO3 − . It makes sense to
assume this in highly acidic media, and in the absence of iodide,
as evidenced in our investigation. However, if the reaction occurs
in a neutral medium (pH 7) and in the presence of excess iodide,
the reaction of chlorate with iodide ions should be ignored [21–26].
Moreover, there is no need for iodide to come from the hydrolysis
of iodine since a surplus of iodide ions already exist in the medium.
Hence, we assume that there is a direct reaction between triiodide
(or favourably iodine) and chlorate similar to that between iodine
and hydrogen peroxide [29]. Based on the above discussion, the
following mechanism may be eligible for the reaction of chlorate
and iodine:

the time required to produce a suitable concentration of HIO and
HIO2 , which can further auto-catalyse the reaction. The reaction was
monitored both potentiometrically and spectrophotometrically, and
a tentative mechanism involving the HIO, HIO2 , and I2 O intermediates was proposed. This oxidation reaction of triiodide by chlorate
can be classified as a clock reaction, since it involves an abrupt
change in the concentration of triiodide ions after a certain induction time. This reaction will definitely help in understanding the BL
mechanism and may initiate a new class of oscillating reactions.
Acknowledgements
The present work was financially supported by Grant-in-Aids for

Scientific Research (No. 17005136) and Scientific Research (A)
(No. 10305064) to T. Ohsaka, from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of the Japanese Government.
M.I. Awad thanks the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
for the Post-Doc fellowship.

I− + I2 ↔ I3 − ,
References
2I3 − + H2 O ↔ I2 O + 4I− + 2H+ ,

(4)

I2 O + ClO3 − + H2 O → HIO + HIO2 + ClO2 − ,

(5)

HIO2 + I− + H+ → I2 O + H2 O,

(6)

I2 O + H2 O → 2HIO,

(7)





+

4HIO → IO3 + I3 + 2H + H2 O.


(8)

Simply, the triiodide, I3 − , is first hydrolysed into hypoiodous
anhydride, I2 O, as shown in Eq. (4). In fact, I2 O is reported to exist
as an important intermediate during the reaction of I2 and H2 O2 [29].
Similar to a previous report [18], chlorate reacts next with I2 O to
produce HIO and HIO2 , as shown in Eq. (5). These two species, HIO
and HIO2 , have been detected as intermediates when HOCl reacts
with iodine [30]. When released to the medium, HIO2 continues
reacting with excess I− in the solution to produce I2 O again (Eq.
(6)). It is also possible that I2 O is further converted to HIO (Eq. (7))
and finally IO3 − (Eq. (8)). Accordingly, IO3 − will be the oxidation
product of iodine, and ClO2 − will be among the intermediates of
chlorate reduction. The possibility of ClO2 − reacting with I− should
still be considered. Work will be extended to verify the mechanism
and to identify the products.
The observed induction period is thought to be the time required
to produce enough catalyst to enhance the reaction. It has been
previously hypothesised that the produced iodate is able to catalyse
the oxidation reaction [3]. We have examined the effect of adding
iodate initially with triiodide and chlorate (data are not shown) but
it did not affect the induction time. Therefore, in our reaction it was
not iodate that catalysed the reaction. We believe that the oxidation
reaction is auto-catalysed by HIO and HIO2 , and the time required
to form the necessary amounts of HIO and HIO2 is regarded as the
induction time.
Conclusion
We have presented a new oxidation reaction for triiodide by chlorate ions in both neutral and slightly acidic media. The reaction
was initiated by an induction period, whose length depended significantly on the acidity of the solution and the concentrations of both

of the triiodide and chlorate. The induction time was thought to be

[1] Bray WC. A periodic reaction in homogeneous solution and its relation
to catalysis. J Am Chem Soc 1921;43(6):1262–7.
[2] Bray WC, Liebhafsky HA. Reactions involving hydrogen peroxide, iodine and iodate ion. I. Introduction. J Am Chem Soc
1931;53(1):38–44.
[3] Liebhafsky HA. Reactions involving hydrogen peroxide, iodine and
iodate ion. IV. The oxidation of iodine to iodate ion by hydrogen
peroxide. J Am Chem Soc 1931;53(6):2074–90.
[4] Liebhafsky HA. The catalytic decomposition of hydrogen peroxide by
the iodine–iodide couple at 25◦ . J Am Chem Soc 1932;54(5):1792–806.
[5] Liebhafsky HA. The catalytic decomposition of hydrogen peroxide by
the iodine–iodide couple. II and III. The rate of oxidation in neutral,
and in acid, solution of hydrogen peroxide by iodine. J Am Chem Soc
1932;54(9):3499–508.
[6] De Kepper P, Epstein IR. Mechanistic study of oscillations and
bistability in the Briggs–Rauscher reaction. J Am Chem Soc
1982;104(1):49–55.
[7] Dateo CE, Orbán M, De Kepper P, Epstein IR. Bistability and oscillations in the autocatalytic chlorite–iodide reaction in a stirred-flow
reactor. J Am Chem Soc 1982;104(2):504–9.
[8] De Faria RB, Epstein IR, Kustin K. The bromite–iodide clock reaction.
J Am Chem Soc 1992;114(18):7164–71.
[9] Oliveira AP, Faria RB. The chlorate–iodine clock reaction. J Am Chem
Soc 2005;127(51):18022–3.
[10] Kapral R, Showalter K. Chemical waves and patterns. 1st ed. Springer;
1995.
[11] Bychkov VY, Tyulenin YP, Slinko MM, Shashkin DP, Korchak VN.
The study of the oscillatory behavior during methane oxidation over
Pd catalysts. J Catal 2009;267(2):181–7.
[12] Wang M, Weng W, Zheng H, Yi X, Huang C, Wan H. Oscillations

during partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas over Ru/Al2 O3
catalyst. J Nat Gas Chem 2009;18(3):300–5.
[13] Awad MI, Oritani T, Ohsaka T. Simultaneous potentiometric determination of peracetic acid and hydrogen peroxide. Anal Chem
2003;75(11):2688–93.
[14] Awad MI, Ohsaka T. Electroanalysis of peroxone. Electrochem Commun 2004;6(11):1135–40.
[15] Awad MI, Sata S, Ohsaka T. Simultaneous electroanalysis of hypochlorite and H2 O2 . Use of I− /I2 as a probing potential buffer. Electroanalysis
2005;17(9):769–75.
[16] Miura Y, Hatakeyama M, Hosino T, Haddad PR. Rapid ion chromatography of l-ascorbic acid, nitrite, sulfite, oxalate, iodide and thiosulfate
by isocratic elution utilizing a postcolumn reaction with cerium(IV)
and fluorescence detection. J Chromatogr A 2002;956(1–2):77–84.


214
[17] Xie Z, Zhao J. Reverse flow injection spectrophotometric determination
of iodate and iodide in table salt. Talanta 2004;63(2):339–43.
[18] Schmitz G. The oxidation of iodine to iodate by hydrogen peroxide.
Phys Chem Chem Phys 2001;3(21):4741–6.
[19] Liebhafsky HA, McGavock WC, Reyes RJ, Roe GM, Wu LS.
Reactions involving hydrogen peroxide, iodine and iodate ion. 6. Oxidation of iodine by hydrogen peroxide at 50 ◦ C. J Am Chem Soc
1978;100(1):87–91.
[20] Tian K, Dasgupta PK. Simultaneous flow-injection measurement of
hydroxide, chloride, hypochlorite and chlorate in chlor-alkali cell effluents. Talanta 2000;52(4):623–30.
[21] Adam LC, Gordon G. Direct and sequential potentiometric
determination of hypochlorite, chlorite and chlorate ions when
hypochlorite ion is present in large excess. Anal Chem 1995;67(3):
535–40.
[22] Charles L, Pépin D. Analysis of oxyhalides in water by ion
chromatography–ionspray mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A
1998;804(1–2):105–11.
[23] Nowack B, Von Gunten U. Determination of chlorate at low ␮g/l levels by ion-chromatography with postcolumn reaction. J Chromatogr A

1999;849(1):209–15.

A.M. Mohammad et al.
[24] Miller KG, Pacey GE, Gordon G. Automated iodometric method for
determination of trace chlorate ion using flow injection analysis. Anal
Chem 1985;57(3):734–7.
[25] Gordon G, Yoshino K, Themelis DG, Wood D, Pacey GE. Utilisation of
kinetic-based flow injection methods for the determination of chlorine
and oxychlorine species. Anal Chim Acta 1989;224(2):383–91.
[26] Themelis DG, Wood DW, Gordon G. Determination of low concentrations of chlorite and chlorate ions by using a flow-injection system.
Anal Chim Acta 1989;225(2):437–41.
[27] Tue Ngeun O, Jakmunee J, Grudpan K. A novel stopped flow injection
– amperometric procedure for the determination of chlorate. Talanta
2005;68(2):459–64.
[28] Chuesaard T, Wonganan T, Wongchanapiboon T, Liawruangrath S.
Reversed flow injection spectrophotometric determination of chlorate.
Talanta 2009;79(4):1181–7.
[29] Kéki S, Székely G, Beck MT. The effect of light on the Bray–Liebhafsky
reaction. J Phys Chem A 2003;107(1):73–5.
[30] Lengyel I, Li J, Kustin K, Epstein IR. Rate constants for reactions
between iodine- and chlorine-containing species: a detailed mechanism of the chlorine dioxide/chlorite–iodide reaction. J Am Chem Soc
1996;118(15):3708–19.



×