Ebook Intermediate accounting (9/E): Part 2

www.downloadslide.net
CHAPTER

11
OVERVIEW

Property, Plant,
and Equipment and
Intangible Assets:
Utilization and
Disposition
This chapter completes our discussion of accounting for property, plant, and
equipment and intangible assets. We address the allocation of the cost of
these assets to the periods benefited by their use.
The usefulness of most of these assets is consumed as the assets are
applied to the production of goods or services. Cost allocation corresponding to this consumption of usefulness is known as depreciation for plant and
equipment, depletion for natural resources, and amortization for intangibles.
We also consider other issues until final disposal such as impairment of
these assets and the treatment of expenditures subsequent to acquisition.

LEARNING
OBJECTIVES

After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
● LO11–1

Explain the concept of cost allocation as it pertains to property, plant, and
equipment and intangible assets. (p. 575)

● LO11–2 Determine periodic depreciation using both time-based and activity-based

methods and account for dispositions. (p. 578)
● LO11–3 Calculate the periodic depletion of a natural resource. (p. 591)
● LO11–4 Calculate the periodic amortization of an intangible asset. (p. 593)
● LO11–5 Explain the appropriate accounting treatment required when a change is made in

the service life or residual value of property, plant, and equipment and intangible
assets. (p. 599)
● LO11–6 Explain the appropriate accounting treatment required when a change in

depreciation, amortization, or depletion method is made. (p. 600)
● LO11–7

Explain the appropriate treatment required when an error in accounting for
property, plant, and equipment and intangible assets is discovered. (p. 601)

● LO11–8 Identify situations that involve a significant impairment of the value of property,

plant, and equipment and intangible assets and describe the required accounting
procedures. (p. 603)
● LO11–9 Discuss the accounting treatment of repairs and maintenance, additions,

improvements, and rearrangements to property, plant, and equipment and
intangible assets. (p. 614)
● LO11–10 Discuss the primary differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS with respect to the

utilization and impairment of property, plant, and equipment and intangible assets.
(pp. 584, 589, 593, 596, 605, 607, 611, and 617)
574

www.downloadslide.net

FINANCIAL REPORTING CASE
What’s in a Name?
“I don’t understand this at all,” your friend Penny Lane moaned. “Depreciation, depletion, amortization; what’s the difference? Aren’t they all the same
thing?” Penny and you are part of a class team working on a case involving
Weyerhaeuser Company, a large forest products company. Part of the project
involves comparing reporting methods over a three-year period. “Look at these
disclosure notes from last year’s annual report. Besides mentioning those three
terms, they also talk about asset impairment. How is that different?” Penny
showed you the disclosure notes.
Property and Equipment and Timber
and Timberlands (in part)

Depreciation is calculated using a straight-line method at rates based on
estimated service lives. Logging roads are generally amortized—as timber is
harvested—at rates based on the volume of timber estimated to be removed.
We carry timber and timberlands at cost less depletion.
Depletion (in part)

To determine depletion rates, we divide the net carrying value by the related
volume of timber estimated to be available over the growth cycle.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets (in part)

© fStop/Getty Images

We review long-lived assets—including certain identifiable intangibles—for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable.

By the time you finish this chapter, you should be able to respond appropriately to the
questions posed in this case. Compare your response to the solution provided at the end
of the chapter.

QUESTIONS

1. Is Penny correct? Do the terms depreciation, depletion, and amortization all mean the
same thing? (p. 576)
2. Weyerhaeuser determines depletion based on the “volume of timber estimated to be
available.” Explain this approach. (p. 581)
3. Explain how asset impairment differs from depreciation, depletion, and amortization.
How do companies measure impairment losses for property, plant, and equipment and
intangible assets with finite useful lives? (p. 602)

PART A

Depreciation, Depletion, and Amortization
Cost Allocation—an Overview
Property, plant, and equipment and intangible assets are purchased with the expectation that
they will provide future benefits. Specifically, they are acquired to be used as part of the
revenue-generating operations, usually for several years. Logically, then, the cost of these
acquisitions initially should be recorded as assets (as we saw in Chapter 10), and then these
costs should be allocated to expense over the reporting periods benefited by their use. That
is, their costs are reported with the revenues they help generate.

● LO11–1

575

www.downloadslide.net
576

SECTION 2        Assets

Let’s suppose that a company purchases a used truck for $8,200 to deliver products to
customers. The company estimates that five years from the acquisition date the truck will be
sold for $2,200. It is estimated, then, that $6,000 ($8,200 − 2,200) of the truck’s purchase
cost will be used up (consumed) during a five-year useful life. The situation is portrayed in
Illustration 11–1.

Illustration 11–1
Cost Allocation

Beginning of
year 1
Year 1

End of
year 5
Year 2

Year 3

$8,200
cost

Year 4

Year 5

$2,200
residual

$6,000

FINANCIAL
Reporting Case
Q1, p. 575
Depreciation, depletion,
and amortization are
processes that allocate an
asset’s cost to periods of
benefit.

Because the truck will help to produce revenues over the next five years, an asset of
$8,200 is recorded at the time of acquisition. Over the subsequent five years, $6,000 of the
truck’s costs is expected to be consumed and, conceptually, should be allocated to expense
in those years in direct proportion to the role the asset played in revenue production. However, very seldom is there a clear-cut relationship between the use of the asset and revenue
production. In other words, we can’t tell precisely the portion of the total benefits of the
asset that was consumed in any particular period. As a consequence, we must resort to
arbitrary allocation methods to approximate the portion of the asset’s cost used each period.
Contrast this situation with the $24,000 prepayment of one year’s rent on an office building
at $2,000 per month. In that case, we know precisely that the benefits of the asset (prepaid
rent) are consumed at a rate of $2,000 per month. That’s why we allocate $2,000 of prepaid
rent to rent expense for each month that passes.
The process of allocating the cost of plant and equipment over the periods they are used
to produce revenues is known as depreciation. The process of depreciation often is confused with measuring a decline in fair value of an asset. For example, let’s say our delivery
truck purchased for $8,200 can be sold for $5,000 at the end of one year but we intend to
keep it for the full five-year estimated life. It has experienced a decline in value of $3,200
($8,200 − 5,000). However, depreciation is a process of cost allocation, not valuation. We

would not record depreciation expense of $3,200 for year one of the truck’s life. Instead, we
would distribute the cost of the asset, less any anticipated residual value, over the estimated
useful life in a systematic and rational manner that attempts to associate revenues with the
use of the asset, not the decline in its value. After all, the truck is purchased to be used in
operations, not to be sold.
For natural resources, we refer to cost allocation as depletion, and for intangible assets,
we refer to it as amortization. While the terms depreciation, depletion, and amortization
differ across types of assets, they conceptually refer to the same idea—the process of allocating an asset’s cost over the periods it is used to produce revenues.
For assets used in the manufacture of a product, depreciation, depletion, or amortization is
considered a product cost to be included as part of the cost of inventory. Eventually, when the
product is sold, it becomes part of the cost of goods sold. For assets not used in production,
primarily plant and equipment and certain intangibles used in the selling and administrative
functions of the company, depreciation or amortization is reported as a period expense in the
income statement. You might recognize this distinction between a product cost and a period
cost. A product cost is reported as an expense (cost of goods sold) when the product is sold; a
period cost is reported as an expense in the reporting period in which it is incurred.

Measuring Cost Allocation
The process of cost allocation requires that three factors be established at the time the asset
is put into use. These factors are
1. Service life—The estimated use that the company expects to receive from the asset.


www.downloadslide.net


CHAPTER 11         Property, Plant, and Equipment and Intangible Assets: Utilization and Disposition

577

2. Allocation base—The cost of the asset expected to be consumed during its service life.
3. Allocation method—The pattern in which the allocation base is expected to be
consumed.
Let’s consider these one at a time.

Service Life
The service life, or useful life, is the amount of use that the company expects to obtain from
the asset before disposing of it. This use can be expressed in units of time or in units of
activity. For example, the estimated service life of a delivery truck could be expressed in
terms of years or in terms of the number of miles that the company expects the truck to be
driven before disposition. We use the terms service life and useful life interchangeably
throughout the chapter.
Physical life provides the upper bound for service life of tangible, long-lived assets.
Physical life will vary according to the purpose for which the asset is acquired and the environment in which it is operated. For example, a diesel powered electric generator may last
for many years if it is used only as an emergency backup or for only a few years if it is used
regularly.
The service life of a tangible asset may be less than physical life for a variety of reasons.
For example, the expected rate of technological change may shorten service life. If suppliers
are expected to develop new technologies that are more efficient, the company may keep an
asset for a period of time much shorter than physical life. Likewise, if the company sells its
product in a market that frequently demands new products, the machinery and equipment
used to produce products may be useful only for as long as its output can be sold. Similarly,
a mineral deposit might be projected to contain 4 million tons of a mineral, but it may be
economically feasible with existing extraction methods to mine only 2 million tons. For
intangible assets, legal or contractual life often is a limiting factor. For instance, a patent
might be capable of providing enhanced profitability for 50 years, but the legal life of a patent is only 20 years.
Management intent also may shorten the period of an asset’s usefulness below its physical, legal, or contractual life. For example, a company may have a policy of using its delivery trucks for a three-year period and then trading the trucks for new models.
Companies quite often disclose the range of service lives for different categories of
assets. For example, Illustration 11–2 shows how IBM Corporation disclosed its service
lives in a note accompanying recent financial statements.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (in part)
Depreciation and Amortization
The estimated useful lives of certain depreciable assets are as follows: buildings, 30 to
50 years; building equipment, 10 to 20 years; land improvements, 20 years; plant, laboratory, and office equipment, 2 to 20 years; and computer equipment, 1.5 to 5 years.

The service life, or useful
life, can be expressed in
units of time or in units of
activity.

Expected obsolescence
can shorten service life
below physical life.

Illustration 11–2

Service Life Disclosure—
International Business
Machines Corporation
Real World Financials

Allocation Base
The amount of cost to be allocated over an asset’s service life is called its allocation base.
The amount is the difference between the asset’s capitalized cost at the date placed in service and the asset’s residual value. Residual value (sometimes called salvage value) is the
amount the company expects to receive for the asset at the end of its service life less any
anticipated disposal costs.
For plant and equipment, we commonly refer to the allocation base as the depreciable
base. In our delivery truck example above, the depreciable base is $6,000 ($8,200 cost less
$2,200 anticipated residual value). We will allocate a portion of the $6,000 to each year of
the truck’s service life. For the depletion of natural resources, we refer to the allocation base

as the depletion base. For amortization of intangible asset, we refer to the allocation base as
the amortization base.

Allocation base is the
difference between the
cost of the asset and its
anticipated residual value.


www.downloadslide.net
578

SECTION 2        Assets

In certain situations, residual value can be estimated by referring to a company’s prior
experience or to publicly available information concerning resale values of various types of
assets. For example, if a company intends to trade its delivery truck in three years for the
new model, approximations of the three-year residual value for that type of truck can be
obtained from used truck values.
However, estimating residual value for many assets can be very difficult due to the
uncertainty about the future. For this reason, along with the fact that residual values often
are immaterial, many companies simply assume a residual value of zero. Companies usually
do not disclose estimated residual values.

Allocation Method
The allocation method
used should be systematic
and rational and
correspond to the pattern
of asset use.

In determining how much cost to allocate to periods of an asset’s use, a method should be
selected that corresponds to the pattern of benefits received from the asset’s use. Generally
accepted accounting principles state that the chosen method should allocate the asset’s cost
“as equitably as possible to the periods during which services are obtained from [its] use.”
GAAP further specifies that the method should produce a cost allocation in a “systematic
and rational manner.”1 The objective is to try to allocate cost to the period in an amount that
is proportional to the amount of benefits generated by the asset during the period relative to
the total benefits provided by the asset during its life.
In practice, there are two general approaches that attempt to obtain this systematic and
rational allocation. The first approach allocates the cost base according to the passage of
time. Methods following this approach are referred to as time-based methods. The second
approach allocates an asset’s cost base using a measure of the asset’s input or output. This
is an activity-based method. We compare these approaches first in the context of depreciation. Later we see that depletion of natural resources typically follows an activity-based
approach, and the amortization of intangibles typically follows a time-based approach.

Depreciation
● LO11–2

To demonstrate and compare the most common depreciation methods, we refer to the situation described in Illustration 11–3.

Illustration 11–3

The Hogan Manufacturing Company purchased a machine for $250,000. The company
expects the service life of the machine to be five years. During that time, it is expected that
the machine will produce 140,000 units. The estimated residual value is $40,000. The
machine was disposed of after five years of use. Actual production during the five years of
the asset’s life was:

Depreciation Methods

Year

Units Produced

1
2
3
4
5
Total

20,000
32,000
44,000
28,000
26,000
150,000

Time-Based Depreciation Methods
The straight-line method
depreciates an equal
amount of the depreciable
base to each year of the
asset’s service life.

STRAIGHT-LINE METHOD  By far the most easily understood and widely used depreciation method is straight line. In this approach, an equal amount of the depreciable base (or
allocation base) is allocated to each year of the asset’s service life. The depreciable base is
simply divided by the number of years in the asset’s life to determine annual depreciation.
FASB ASC 360–10–35–4: Property, Plant, and Equipment–Overall–Subsequent Measurement (previously “Restatement and Revision

of Accounting Research Bulletins,” Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43 (New York: AICPA, 1953), Ch. 9).

1


www.downloadslide.net


CHAPTER 11         Property, Plant, and Equipment and Intangible Assets: Utilization and Disposition

579

Using the information given in Illustration 11–3, straight-line depreciation expense in each
year is $42,000, calculated as follows:
$250,000 − 40,000
_____________
​​   
  
 ​ = $42,000 per year​
5 years

The calculation of depreciation over the entire five-year life is demonstrated in detail in
I­ llustration 11–3A. Notice the last three columns. Depreciation expense is the portion of the asset’s
cost that is allocated to an expense in the current year. Accumulated depreciation (a contra-­asset
account) represents the cumulative amount of the asset’s cost that has been depreciated in all prior
years including the current year. This amount represents the reduction in the asset’s cost reported
in the balance sheet. The asset is reported in the balance sheet at its book value, which is the asset’s
cost minus accumulated depreciation. Book value is sometimes called carrying value or carrying
amount. The residual value ($40,000 in this example) does not affect the calculation of book value,
but the residual value does set a limit on which book value cannot go below.

Illustration 11–3A  Straight-Line Depreciation
Using the information given in Illustration 11–3:

Year
1
2
3
4
5
Totals

Depreciable
Base
($250,000 − 40,000)
$210,000
210,000
210,000
210,000
210,000

×

Depreciation
Rate per Year

=

⁄5*
⁄5

1
⁄5
1
⁄5
1
⁄5

1

1

Depreciation
Expense

Accumulated
Depreciation

Book Value
End of Year
($250,000
less Accum.
Depreciation)

$   42,000
42,000
42,000
42,000
42,000
$210,000

$  42,000
84,000
126,000
168,000
210,000

$208,000
166,000
124,000
82,000
40,000

*The rate equals one divided by the asset’s five-year estimated service life (1⁄5 = 20%).

The entry to record depreciation at the end of each year using the straight-line method
would be:
Depreciation expense������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
  Accumulated depreciation�����������������������������������������������������������������������������

42,000*
42,000

*$42,000 = ($250,000 − 40,000) ÷ 5 years.

ACCELERATED METHODS  Using the straight-line method implicitly assumes that the
benefits derived from the use of the asset are the same each year. In some situations it might
be more appropriate to assume that the asset will provide greater benefits in the early years
of its life than in the later years. In these cases, a more appropriate matching of depreciation
with revenues is achieved with a declining pattern of depreciation, with higher depreciation
in the early years of the asset’s life and lower depreciation in later years.

An accelerated depreciation method also would be appropriate when benefits derived
from the asset are approximately equal over the asset’s life, but repair and maintenance costs
increase significantly in later years. The early years incur higher depreciation and lower
repairs and maintenance expense, while the later years have lower depreciation and higher
repairs and maintenance. Two ways to achieve such a declining pattern of d­ epreciation are
the sum-of-the-years’-digits method and declining balance methods.

Accelerated depreciation
methods report higher
depreciation in earlier
years.

Sum-of-the-years’-digits method.  The sum-of-the-years’-digits (SYD) method has no

The SYD method
multiplies depreciable
base by a declining
fraction.

logical foundation other than the fact that it accomplishes the objective of accelerating
depreciation in a systematic manner. This is achieved by multiplying the depreciable base
by a fraction that declines each year and results in depreciation that decreases by the same


www.downloadslide.net
580

SECTION 2        Assets

amount each year. The denominator of the fraction remains constant and is the sum of the

digits from one to n, where n is the number of years in the asset’s service life. For example,
if there are five years in the service life, the denominator is the sum of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5,
which equals 15.2 The numerator decreases each year; it begins with the value of n in the
first year and decreases by one each year until it equals one in the final year of the asset’s
estimated service life. The annual fractions for an asset with a five-year life are: 5⁄15, 4⁄15, 3⁄15,
2
⁄15, and 1⁄15. We calculate depreciation for the five years of the machine’s life using the sumof-the-years’-digits method in Illustration 11–3B.

Illustration 11–3B  Sum-of-the-Years’-Digits Depreciation
Using the information given in Illustration 11–3:

Year
1
2
3
4
5
Totals

Depreciable
Base
($250,000 − 40,000)
$210,000
210,000
210,000
210,000
210,000

×

Depreciation
Rate per Year
⁄15*
⁄15
3
⁄15
2
⁄15
1
⁄15
15
⁄15
5
4

=

Depreciation
Expense

Accumulated
Depreciation

Book Value
End of Year
($250,000
less Accum.
Depreciation)

$  70,000

56,000
42,000
28,000
14,000
$210,000

$ 70,000
126,000
168,000
196,000
210,000

$180,000
124,000
82,000
54,000
40,000

*______
n​​(​​n + 1​)​​​ ______
5​​(​​5  + 1​)​​​
​​  ​​ ​  2 ​  
 = ​  2 ​  
 = 15​
​

Notice that total depreciation ($210,000) is the same for an accelerated method like SYD
as it is for the straight-line method, as shown in Illustration 11–3A. The difference is the
pattern in which this total cost is allocated to each year of the asset’s service life.
Declining balance

depreciation methods
multiply beginning-ofyear book value, not
depreciable base, by
an annual rate that is a
multiple of the straight-line
rate.

Declining balance methods.  As an alternative, an accelerated depreciation pattern can be

achieved by a declining balance method. Rather than multiplying a constant balance by a
declining fraction as we do in SYD depreciation, we multiply a constant fraction by a declining balance each year. Specifically, we multiply a constant percentage rate times the decreasing book value (cost less accumulated depreciation) of the asset (not depreciable base) at the
beginning of the year. Because the rate remains constant while the book value declines,
annual depreciation declines each year.
A common declining balance method is known as the double-declining-balance (DDB)
method. Under this method, we multiply the straight-line rate by 200% (or double the
straight-line rate). For example, in our illustration, the double-declining-balance rate would
be 40% (double the straight-line rate of 20%). Various other multiples are used in practice,
such as 125% or 150% of the straight-line rate.
Depreciation using the double-declining-balance method is calculated in Illustration 11–3C
for the five years of the machine’s life. Notice that book value at the beginning of the year,
rather than the depreciable base, is used as the starting point. Further, notice that in year
4 we did not multiply $54,000 by 40%. If we had, annual depreciation would have been
$21,600. This amount would have resulted in accumulated depreciation by the end of year
4 of $217,600 and book value of $32,400, which is below the asset’s expected residual
value of $40,000. Therefore, we instead use a plug amount that reduces book value to the
expected residual value (book value beginning of year, $54,000, minus expected residual
value, $40,000 = $14,000). This also means there is no depreciation in year 5 since book
value has already been reduced to the expected residual value. Declining balance methods
often allocate the asset’s depreciable base over fewer years than the expected service life.

A formula useful when calculating the denominator is n (n + 1)/2.

2


www.downloadslide.net


CHAPTER 11         Property, Plant, and Equipment and Intangible Assets: Utilization and Disposition

Illustration 11–3C

Using the information given in Illustration 11–3:
Book Value
End of Year
Book Value
($250,000
Beginning of
Depreciation
Depreciation Accumulated less Accum.
Year
Year
× Rate per Year =
Expense
Depreciation Depreciation)
1
2
3
4
5

Total

$250,000
150,000
90,000
54,000
40,000

40%*
40%
40%

581

$100,000
60,000
36,000
14,000†
—
$210,000

$100,000
160,000
196,000
210,000

Double-Declining-Balance
Depreciation

$150,000

90,000
54,000
40,000
40,000

*Double the straight-line rate of 20%. The straight-line rate is one divided by the asset’s five-year estimated service life
(1⁄ 5 = 20%).
†Amount necessary to reduce book value to residual value.

SWITCH FROM ACCELERATED TO STRAIGHT LINE.  The result of applying the double-declining-balance method in our illustration produces an awkward result in the later
years of the asset’s life. By using the double-declining-balance method in our illustration,
no depreciation is recorded in year 5 even though the asset is still producing benefits. As a
planned approach to depreciation, many companies have a formal policy to use accelerated
depreciation for approximately the first half of an asset’s service life and then switch to the
straight-line method for the remaining life of the asset.
In our illustration, the company would switch to straight line in either year 3 or year 4.
Assuming the switch is made at the beginning of year 4, and the book value at the beginning of that year is $54,000, an additional $14,000 ($54,000 − 40,000 in residual value) of
depreciation must be recorded over the remaining life of the asset. Applying the straight-line
concept, $7,000 ($14,000 divided by two remaining years) in depreciation is recorded in
both year 4 and year 5.
It should be noted that this switch to straight line is not a change in depreciation method.
The switch is part of the company’s planned depreciation approach. However, as you will
learn later in the chapter, the accounting treatment is the same as a change in depreciation
method.

Activity-Based Depreciation Methods
The most logical way to allocate an asset’s cost to periods of an asset’s use is to measure the
usefulness of the asset in terms of its productivity. For example, we could measure the service life of a machine in terms of its output (for example, the estimated number of units it
will produce) or in terms of its input (for example, the number of hours it will operate). We
have already mentioned that one way to measure the service life of a vehicle is to estimate

the number of miles it will operate. The most common activity-based method is called the
units-of-production method.
The measure of output used is the estimated number of units (pounds, items, barrels, etc.)
to be produced by the machine. By the units-of-production method, we first compute the
average depreciation rate per unit by dividing the depreciable base by the number of units
expected to be produced. This per unit rate is then multiplied by the actual number of units
produced each period. In our illustration, the depreciation rate per unit is $1.50, computed as
follows:
$250,000 − 40,000
_____________
  
​​    
 ​ = $1.50 per unit​
140,000 units
Each unit produced will require $1.50 of depreciation to be recorded. In other words,
each unit produced is assigned $1.50 of the asset’s cost.

It is not uncommon for a
company to switch from
accelerated to straight
line approximately
halfway through an
asset’s useful life as part
of the company’s planned
depreciation approach.

Activity-based
depreciation methods
estimate service life in
terms of some measure of

productivity.

FINANCIAL
Reporting Case
Q2, p. 575
The units-of-production
method computes a
depreciation rate per
measure of activity and
then multiplies this rate by
actual activity to determine
periodic depreciation.


www.downloadslide.net
582

SECTION 2        Assets

Illustration 11–3D shows that depreciation each year is the actual units produced multiplied by the depreciation rate per unit. This means that the amount of depreciation each year
varies proportionately with the number of units being produced, with one exception. Notice
that the asset produced 26,000 units in year 5, causing total production over the life of the
asset (150,000 units) to exceed its estimated production (140,000 units). In this case, we
cannot record depreciation for the final 10,000 units produced. Depreciation in year five is
limited to the amount that brings the book value of the asset down to its residual value (book
value beginning of year, $64,000, minus expected residual value, $40,000 = $24,000).

Illustration 11–3D

Units-of-Production

Depreciation

Using the information given in Illustration 11–3:

Year

Units
Produced

1
2
3
4
5
Totals

20,000
32,000
44,000
28,000
26,000
150,000

×

Depreciation
Rate per Unit

=

Depreciation
Expense

Accumulated
Depreciation

Book Value
End of Year
($250,000
less Accum.
Depreciation)

$ 30,000
48,000
66,000
42,000
24,000†
$210,000

$ 30,000
78,000
144,000
186,000
210,000

$220,000
172,000
106,000
64,000
40,000

$1.50*
1.50
1.50
1.50

*($250,000 − 40,000) / 140,000 units = $1.50 per unit.
†Amount necessary to reduce book value to residual value.

The machine may produce fewer than 140,000 units by the end of its useful life. For
example, suppose production in year 5 had been only 6,000 units, bringing total production
to 130,000 units, and management has no future plans to use the machine. We would record
depreciation in Year 5 for $9,000 (6,000 units × $1.50). If management then develops a
formal plan to sell the machine, the machine is classified as “held for sale” (discussed in
more detail below) and reported at the lower of its current book value or its fair value less
any cost to sell. If management plans to retire the asset without selling it, a loss is recorded
for the remaining book value.

Decision Makers’ Perspective—Selecting A Depreciation Method
All methods provide the
same total depreciation
over an asset’s life.

Illustration 11–3E compares periodic depreciation calculated using each of the alternatives
we discussed and illustrated.

Illustration 11–3E

Comparison of Various
Depreciation Methods

Year

Straight Line

Sum-of-theYears’-Digits

Double-Declining
Balance

Units of
Production

1
2
3
4
5
Total

$ 42,000
42,000
42,000
42,000
42,000
$210,000

$ 70,000
56,000
42,000

28,000
 14,000
$210,000

$100,000
60,000
36,000
14,000
0
$210,000

$  30,000
48,000
66,000
42,000
24,000
$210,000

Conceptually, using an activity-based depreciation method provides a better matching of
the asset’s cost to the use of that asset to help produce revenues. Clearly, the productivity of


www.downloadslide.net


CHAPTER 11         Property, Plant, and Equipment and Intangible Assets: Utilization and Disposition

a plant asset is more closely associated with the benefits provided by that asset than the mere
passage of time. Also, these methods allow for patterns of depreciation to correspond with
the patterns of asset use.

However, activity-based methods quite often are either infeasible or too costly to use. For
example, buildings don’t have an identifiable measure of productivity. Even for machinery, there may be an identifiable measure of productivity such as machine hours or units
produced, but it frequently is more costly to determine each period than it is to simply measure the passage of time. For these reasons, most companies use time-based depreciation
methods.
Illustration 11–4 shows the results of a recent survey of depreciation methods used by
large public companies.3
Depreciation Method
Straight line
Declining balance
Sum-of-the-years’-digits
Accelerated method—not specified
Units of production
Group/composite

Number of Companies
490
9
2
9
12
17

Why do so many companies use the straight-line method as opposed to other time-based
methods? Many companies perhaps consider the benefits derived from the majority of plant
assets to be realized approximately evenly over these assets’ useful lives. Certainly a contributing factor is that straight-line is the easiest method to understand and apply.
Another motivation is the positive effect on reported income. Straight-line depreciation
produces a higher net income than accelerated methods in the early years of an asset’s life.
In Chapter 8 we pointed out that reported net income can affect bonuses paid to management or debt agreements with lenders.
Conflicting with the desire to report higher profits is the desire to reduce taxes by reducing taxable income. An accelerated method serves this objective by reducing taxable income
more in the early years of an asset’s life than straight line. You probably recall a similar

discussion from Chapter 8 in which the benefits of using the LIFO inventory method during
periods of increasing costs were described. However, remember that the LIFO conformity
rule requires companies using LIFO for income tax reporting to also use LIFO for financial
reporting. No such conformity rule exists for depreciation methods. Income tax regulations
allow firms to use different approaches to computing depreciation in their tax returns and in
their financial statements. The method used for tax purposes is therefore not a constraint in
the choice of depreciation methods for financial reporting. As a result, most companies use
the straight-line method for financial reporting and the Internal Revenue Service’s prescribed accelerated method (discussed in Appendix 11A) for income tax purposes. For
example, Illustration 11–5 shows Merck & Co.’s depreciation policy as reported in a disclosure note accompanying recent financial statements.
Summary of Accounting Policies (in part):
Depreciation
Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the assets, principally using the
straight-line method. For tax purposes, accelerated methods are used.

It is not unusual for a company to use different depreciation methods for different classes
of assets. For example, Illustration 11–6 illustrates the International Paper Company
depreciation policy disclosure contained in a note accompanying recent financial statements.
3

U.S. GAAP Financial Statements–Best Practices in Presentation and Disclosure– 2013 (New York: AICPA, 2013).

583

Activity-based methods
are conceptually superior
to time-based methods but
often are impractical to
apply in practice.

Illustration 11–4

Use of Various
Depreciation Methods
Real World Financials

A company does not
have to use the same
depreciation method for
both financial reporting
and income tax purposes.

Illustration 11–5

Depreciation Method
Disclosure—Merck & Co.
Real World Financials


www.downloadslide.net
584

SECTION 2        Assets

Illustration 11–6

Summary of Accounting Policies (in part):
Plants, Properties, and Equipment

Depreciation Method
Disclosure—International

Paper Company

Plants, properties, and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. The
units-of-production method of depreciation is used for major pulp and paper mills and the
straight-line method is used for other plants and equipment.

Real World Financials

International Financial Reporting Standards
Depreciation. IAS No. 16 requires that each component of an item of property, plant, and
equipment must be depreciated separately if its cost is significant in relation to the total cost
of the item.4 In the United States, component depreciation is allowed but is not often used in
practice.
Consider the following illustration:
Cavandish LTD. purchased a delivery truck for $62,000. The truck is expected to have
a service life of six years and a residual value of $12,000. At the end of three years, the
oversized tires, which have a cost of $6,000 (included in the $62,000 purchase price), will
be replaced.
Under U.S. GAAP, the typical accounting treatment is to depreciate the $50,000
($62,000 – 12,000) depreciable base of the truck over its six-year useful life. Using
IFRS, the depreciable base of the truck is $44,000 ($62,000 – 12,000 – 6,000) and
is depreciated over the truck’s six-year useful life, and the $6,000 cost of the tires is
depreciated separately over a three-year useful life.

● LO11–10

U.S. GAAP and IFRS determine depreciable base in the same way, by subtracting
estimated residual value from cost. However, IFRS requires a review of residual values at
least annually.
Sanofi-Aventis, a French pharmaceutical company, prepares its financial statements using

IFRS. In its property, plant, and equipment note, the company discloses its use of the
component-based approach to accounting for depreciation.
Property, plant, and equipment (in part)
The component-based approach to accounting for property, plant, and equipment is
applied. Under this approach, each component of an item of property, plant, and equipment
with a cost which is significant in relation to the total cost of the item and which has a
different useful life from the other components must be depreciated separately.

Depreciation Methods. IAS No. 16 specifically mentions three depreciation methods:
straight-line, units-of-production, and the diminishing balance method. The diminishing
balance method is similar to the declining balance method sometimes used by U.S.
companies. As in the U.S., the straight-line method is used by most companies. A recent
survey of large companies that prepare their financial statement according to IFRS reports
93% of the surveyed companies used the straight-line method.5

Concept Review Exercise
DEPRECIATION
METHODS

The Sprague Company purchased a fabricating machine on January 1, 2018, at a net cost of
$130,000. At the end of its four-year useful life, the company estimates that the machine will
be worth $30,000. Sprague also estimates that the machine will run for 25,000 hours during
its four-year life. The company’s fiscal year ends on December 31.
“Property, Plant and Equipment,” International Accounting Standard No. 16 (IASCF), par. 42, as amended effective January 1, 2016.
“IFRS Accounting Trends and Techniques” (New York, AICPA, 2011), p. 328.

4
5

www.downloadslide.net


CHAPTER 11         Property, Plant, and Equipment and Intangible Assets: Utilization and Disposition

585

Required:

Compute depreciation for 2018 through 2021 using each of the following methods:
1. Straight line
2. Sum-of-the-years’-digits
3. Double-declining balance
4. Units of production (using machine hours); actual production was as follows:
Year

Machine Hours

2018
2019
2020
2021

6,000
8,000
5,000
7,000

Solution:

1. Straight line:

$130,000 − 30,000
_____________
​​   
  
 ​ = $25,000 per year​
4 years

2. Sum-of-the-years’-digits:
Depreciable
Base

Year
2018
2019
2020
2021
Total

Depreciation
Rate per Year

×

4⁄10

$100,000
100,000
100,000

100,000

=

Depreciation
Expense
$   40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
$100,000

3⁄10
2⁄10
1⁄10

3. Double-declining balance:
Year
2018
2019
2020
2021
Total

Book Value
Beginning of Year

Depreciation
Rate per Year

×

$130,000
65,000
32,500
30,000

=

50%*
50%

Depreciation
Expense

Book Value
End of Year

$   65,000
32,500
2,500†
—
$100,000

$65,000
32,500
30,000
30,000

*Double the straight-line rate of 25%. The straight-line rate is one divided by the asset’s four-year estimated service life.

†Amount necessary to reduce book value to residual value.

4. Units of production (using machine hours):
Year

Machine Hours

2018
2019
2020
2021
Total

6,000
8,000
5,000
7,000

×

Depreciation
Rate per Hour
$4*
4
4

=

Depreciation
Expense

Book Value
End of Year

$ 24,000
32,000
20,000
  24,000†
$100,000

$106,000
74,000
54,000
30,000

*($130,000 − 30,000)/25,000 hours = $4 per hour.
†Amount necessary to reduce book value to residual value.

Dispositions
After using property, plant, and equipment and intangible assets, companies will sell or
retire those assets. When selling property, plant, and equipment and intangible assets for
monetary consideration (cash or a receivable), the seller recognizes a gain or loss for the
difference between the consideration received and the book value of the asset sold.

A gain or loss is
recognized for the
difference between the
consideration received and
the asset’s book value.

www.downloadslide.net
586

SECTION 2        Assets

Consideration received
Less: Book value of asset sold
  Gain/loss on sale of asset

$xxx
 (xxx)
$xxx

We’ll demonstrate this calculation next in Illustration 11–3F by modifying our earlier
example of Hogan Manufacturing Company in Illustration 11–3A. In Illustration 11–3F,
Hogan sells a machine before the end of its service life and receives more cash than the
asset’s book value (cost minus accumulated depreciation) at the time of the sale. This causes
a gain to be recognized. We then modify the example to show that when the amount of cash
received is less than the asset’s book value, a loss is recognized.

Illustration 11–3F

Sale of Property, Plant, and
Equipment

On January 1, 2018, Hogan Manufacturing Company purchased a machine for $250,000.
The company expects the service life of the machine to be five years. The estimated
residual value is $40,000. Hogan uses the straight-line depreciation method.
Suppose Hogan decides not to hold the machine for the expected five years but instead

sells it on December 31, 2020 (three years later), for $140,000. We first need to update
depreciation to the date of sale. Since depreciation for 2018 and 2019 has already been
recorded in those years, we need to update depreciation only for the current year, 2020.
The entry to update depreciation for 2020:
Depreciation expense�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
  Accumulated depreciation������������������������������������������������������������������������

42,000*
42,000

*$42,000 = ($250,000 − 40,000) ÷ 5 years. See also Illustration 11–3A.

The balance of accumulated depreciation equals depreciation that has already been
recorded in 2018 and 2019 ($42,000 + $42,000) plus the depreciation recorded above in
2020 ($42,000).
Accumulated Depreciation
42,000 2018
42,000 2019
42,000 2020
126,000
We can now calculate the gain or loss on the sale as the difference between consideration
received and the asset’s book value. In this example, the amount of cash received is greater
than the asset’s book value, so a gain is recognized.
Consideration received
Less: Book value of asset sold
  Gain on sale of machine

$140,000
(124,000)†
$ 16,000

†Book value = Cost ($250,000) − Accumulated Depreciation ($126,000)

Finally, the sale of the equipment requires (1) the cash received to be recorded, (2) the
machine’s account balance as well as its accumulated depreciation balance to be removed
from the books, and (3) the gain or loss recognized.
The entry to record the sale on December 31, 2020, for $140,000:
Cash���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
Accumulated depreciation (account balance)������������������������������������������
  Machine (account balance)������������������������������������������������������������������������
  Gain on sale of machine (difference)������������������������������������������������������

140,000
126,000
250,000
16,000

The balances of the machine account and the accumulated depreciation account will be
$0 after this entry. The gain on the sale normally is reported in the income statement as a
separate component of operating expenses.

Now, assume that Hogan sold the machine on December 31, 2020, for only $110,000.
This amount is less than book value by $14,000 and a loss on the sale would be recorded.


www.downloadslide.net


CHAPTER 11         Property, Plant, and Equipment and Intangible Assets: Utilization and Disposition

Consideration received
Less: Book value of asset sold
  Loss on sale of machine

587

$ 110,000
(124,000)
$ (14,000)

The entry to record the sale on December 31, 2020, for $110,000
Cash��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
Accumulated depreciation (account balance)�����������������������������������������������
Loss on sale of machine (difference)����������������������������������������������������������������
  Machine (account balance)�����������������������������������������������������������������������������

110,000
126,000
14,000
250,000

Notice that the amounts of the machine and accumulated depreciation removed from
the books upon sale of the asset do not depend on whether a gain or loss is recorded; the
asset’s book value is written off completely. It’s the amount of cash received relative to
the asset’s book value that determines the amount of the gain or loss.

Decision Makers’ Perspective—Understanding gains and losses
It’s tempting to think of a “gain” and “loss” on the sale of a depreciable asset as “good” and
“bad” news. For example, we commonly use the term “gain” in everyday language to mean
we sold something for more than we bought it. Gain could also be misinterpreted to mean

the asset was sold for more than its fair value (we got a “good deal”). However, neither of
these represents the meaning of a gain on the sale of assets. Refer back to our example in
Illustration 11–3F. The sale of the machine resulted in a gain, but the machine was sold for
less than its original cost, and there is no indication that Hogan sold the machine for more
than its fair value.
A gain on the sale of a depreciable asset simply means the asset was sold for more than its
book value. In other words, the asset being received and recorded (such as cash) is greater
than the recorded book value of the asset being sold and written off. The net increase in the
book value of total assets is an accounting gain (not an economic gain).
The same is true for losses. A loss signifies that the cash received is less than the book
value of the asset being sold; there is a net decrease in the book value of total assets.  ●
ASSETS HELD FOR SALE.  Sometimes management plans to sell property, plant, and
equipment or an intangible asset but that sale hasn’t yet happened. In this case, the asset is
classified as “held for sale” in the period in which all of the following criteria are met:6
1 . Management commits to a plan to sell the asset.
2. The asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition.
3. An active plan to locate a buyer and sell the asset has been initiated.
4. The completed sale of the asset is probable and typically expected to occur within one
year.
5. The asset is being offered for sale at a reasonable price relative to its current fair value.
6. Management’s actions indicate the plan is unlikely to change significantly or be
withdrawn.
An asset that is classified as held for sale is no longer depreciated or amortized. An asset
classified as held for sale is reported at the lower of its current book value or its fair value
less any cost to sell. If the fair value less cost to sell is below book value, we recognize a
loss in the current period. If financial statements are again prepared prior to the sale, we
reassess the asset’s fair value less selling costs. If a further decline has occurred, we recognize another loss. If the fair value less selling costs has increased since the previous measurement, we recognize a gain, but limited to the cumulative amount of any previous losses.
FASB ASC 360–10–45–9: Property, Plant, and Equipment–Overall–Other Presentation Matters–Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets.

6

Property, plant, and
equipment or an intangible
asset to be disposed of by
sale is classified as held
for sale and measured at
the lower of the asset’s
book value or the asset’s
fair value less cost to sell.


www.downloadslide.net
588

SECTION 2        Assets

RETIREMENTS.  Sometimes instead of selling a used asset, a company will retire (or
abandon) the asset. Retirements are treated similarly to selling for monetary consideration.
At the time of retirement, the asset account and the corresponding accumulated deprecation
account are removed from the books and a loss equal to the remaining book value of the
asset is recorded because there will be no monetary consideration received. When there is a
formal plan to retire an asset but before the actual retirement, there may be some revision in
depreciation due a change in the estimated service life or residual value.

Group and Composite Depreciation Methods
Group and composite
depreciation methods
aggregate assets to
reduce the recordkeeping

costs of determining
periodic depreciation.

As you might imagine, depreciation records could become quite cumbersome and costly if a
company has hundreds, or maybe thousands, of depreciable assets. However, the burden can
be lessened if the company uses the group or composite method to depreciate assets collectively rather than individually. The two methods are the same except for the way the collection of assets is aggregated for depreciation. The group depreciation method defines the
collection as depreciable assets that share similar service lives and other attributes. For
example, group depreciation could be used for fleets of vehicles or collections of machinery. The composite depreciation method is used when assets are physically dissimilar but
are aggregated anyway to gain the convenience of a collective depreciation calculation. For
instance, composite depreciation can be used for all of the depreciable assets in one manufacturing plant, even though individual assets in the composite may have widely diverse
service lives.
Both approaches are similar in that they involve applying a single straight-line rate based
on the average service lives of the assets in the group or composite.7 The process is demonstrated using Illustration 11–7.

Illustration 11–7

The Express Delivery Company began operations in 2018. It will depreciate its fleet of
delivery vehicles using the group method. The cost of vehicles purchased early in 2018,
along with residual values, estimated lives, and straight-line depreciation per year by type of
vehicle, are as follows:

Group Depreciation

Asset
Vans
Trucks
Wagons
 Totals

Cost

Residual
Value

Depreciable
Base

$150,000
120,000
60,000
$330,000

$30,000
16,000
12,000
$58,000

$120,000
104,000
48,000
$272,000

Estimated
Life
(years)

Depreciation
per Year
(straight line)

6
5
4

$ 20,000
20,800
12,000
$52,800

The group depreciation rate is determined by dividing the depreciation per year by the total
cost. The group’s average service life is calculated by dividing the depreciable base by the
depreciation per year:
$52,800
Group depreciation rate = _______
​ 
 
 ​   
= 16%
$330,000
​​
    
​  ​ 
​
​​
$272,000
Average service life = _______
​ 
 ​   
= 5.15  years​ ​(​​rounded​)​​​
$52,800

The depreciation rate is
applied to the total cost of
the group or composite for
the period.

If there are no changes in the assets contained in the group, depreciation of $52,800 per
year ($330,000 × 16%) will be recorded for 5.15 years. This means the depreciation in the
sixth year will be $7,920 (0.15 of a full year’s depreciation = 15% × $52,800), which
depreciates the cost of the group down to its estimated residual value. In other words, the
group will be depreciated over the average service life of the assets in the group.
A declining balance method could also be used with either the group or composite method by applying a multiple (e.g., 200%) to the
straight-line group or composite rate.

7


www.downloadslide.net


CHAPTER 11         Property, Plant, and Equipment and Intangible Assets: Utilization and Disposition

In practice, there very likely will be changes in the assets constituting the group as new
assets are added and others are retired or sold. Additions are recorded by increasing the
group asset account for the cost of the addition. Depreciation is determined by multiplying
the group rate by the total cost of assets in the group for that period. Once the group or composite rate and the average service life are determined, they normally are continued despite
the addition and disposition of individual assets. This implicitly assumes that the service
lives of new assets approximate those of individual assets they replace.
Because depreciation records are not kept on an individual asset basis, dispositions are
recorded under the assumption that the book value of the disposed item exactly equals any

proceeds received and no gain or loss is recorded. For example, if a delivery truck in the
above illustration that cost $15,000 is sold for $3,000 in the year 2021, the following journal
entry is recorded:
Cash��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
Accumulated depreciation (difference)�����������������������������������������������������������
 Vehicles���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

589

No gain or loss is
recorded when a group or
composite asset is retired
or sold.

3,000
12,000
15,000

Any actual gain or loss is included in the accumulated depreciation account. This practice
generally will not distort income as the unrecorded gains tend to offset unrecorded losses.
The group and composite methods simplify the recordkeeping of depreciable assets. This
simplification justifies any immaterial errors in income determination. Illustration 11–8
shows a disclosure note accompanying recent financial statements of the El Paso Natural
Gas Company (EPNG) describing the use of the group depreciation method for its property that is regulated by federal statutes.

Illustration 11–8

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (in part)
Property, Plant, and Equipment (in part)
We use the group method to depreciate property, plant, and equipment. Under this method,

assets with similar lives and characteristics are grouped and depreciated as one asset. We
apply the depreciation rate approved in our rate settlements to the total cost of the group
until its net book value equals its salvage value. The majority of our property, plant, and
equipment are on our El Paso Natural Gas Company (EPNG) system, which has depreciation
rates ranging from one percent to 50 percent.
When we retire property, plant, and equipment, we charge accumulated depreciation
and amortization for the original cost of the assets in addition to the cost to remove, sell, or
dispose of the assets, less their salvage value. We do not recognize a gain or loss unless we
sell an entire operating unit.

Disclosure of Depreciation
Method—El Paso Natural
Gas Company
Real World Financials

Additional group-based depreciation methods, the retirement and replacement methods,
are discussed in Appendix 11B.

International Financial Reporting Standards
Valuation of Property, Plant, and Equipment. As we’ve discussed, under U.S. GAAP a
company reports property, plant, and equipment (PP&E) in the balance sheet at cost less
accumulated depreciation (book value). IAS No. 16 allows a company to report property,
plant, and equipment at that amount or, alternatively, at its fair value (revaluation).8 If a
company chooses revaluation, all assets within a class of PP&E must be revalued on a
regular basis. U.S. GAAP prohibits revaluation.
(continued)

8

“Property, Plant and Equipment,” International Accounting Standard No. 16 (IASCF), as amended effective January 1, 2016.

● LO11–10


www.downloadslide.net
590

SECTION 2        Assets

(concluded)
If the revaluation option is chosen, the way the company reports the difference between
fair value and book value depends on which amount is higher:
• If fair value is higher than book value, the difference is reported as other comprehensive
income (OCI) which then accumulates in a “revaluation surplus” (sometimes called
revaluation reserve) account in equity.
• If book value is higher than fair value, the difference is reported as an expense in the
income statement. An exception is when a revaluation surplus account relating to the
same asset has a balance from a previous increase in fair value, that balance is eliminated
before debiting revaluation expense.
Consider the following illustration:
Candless Corporation prepares its financial statements according to IFRS. At the beginning
of its 2018 fiscal year, the company purchased equipment for $100,000. The equipment is
expected to have a five-year useful life with no residual value, so depreciation for 2018 is
$20,000. At the end of the year, Candless chooses to revalue the equipment as permitted by
IAS No. 16. Assuming that the fair value of the equipment at year-end is $84,000, Candless
records depreciation and the revaluation using the following journal entries:
(a) Depreciation expense ($100,000 ÷ 5 years)������������������������������������������
  Accumulated depreciation������������������������������������������������������������������������

20,000

20,000

After this entry, the book value of the equipment is $80,000; the fair value is $84,000.
We use the ratio of the two amounts to adjust both the equipment and the accumulated
depreciation accounts (and thus the book value) to fair value ($ in thousands):
December 31, 2018
Equipment
Accumulated depreciation
  Book value

Before Revaluation
$100
20
$ 80

After Revaluation
×
×
×

/

84 80

/

84 80

/

84 80

=
=
=

$105
21
$   84

The entries to revalue the equipment and the accumulated depreciation accounts (and thus
the book value) are:
To record the revaluation
of equipment to its fair
value.

(b) Equipment ($105,000 – 100,000)��������������������������������������������������������������
  Accumulated depreciation ($21,000 – 20,000)���������������������������������
  Revaluation surplus—OCI ($84,000 – 80,000)�����������������������������������

5,000
1,000
4,000

The new basis for the equipment is its fair value of $84,000 ($105,000 − 21,000), and the
following years’ depreciation is based on that amount. Thus, 2019 depreciation would be
$84,000 divided by the four remaining years, or $21,000:9
(a) Depreciation expense ($84,000 ÷ 4 years)���������������������������������������������
  Accumulated depreciation������������������������������������������������������������������������

21,000
21,000

After this entry, the accumulated depreciation is $42,000 and the book value of the
equipment is $63,000. Let’s say the fair value now is $57,000. We use the ratio of the
two amounts (fair value of $57,000 divided by book value of $63,000) to adjust both the
equipment and the accumulated depreciation accounts (and thus the book value) to fair
value ($ in thousands):
December 31, 2019
Equipment
Accumulated depreciation
  Book value

Before Revaluation
$105
42
$ 63

After Revaluation
×
×
×

/

57 63

/

57 63

/

57 63

=
=
=

$95
38
$57
(continued)

IAS No. 16 allows companies to choose between the method illustrated here and an alternative. The second method eliminates the entire
accumulated depreciation account and adjusts the asset account (equipment in this illustration) to fair value. Using either method the
revaluation surplus (or expense) would be the same.

9


www.downloadslide.net


CHAPTER 11         Property, Plant, and Equipment and Intangible Assets: Utilization and Disposition

591

(concluded)
The entries to revalue the equipment and the accumulated depreciation accounts (and

thus the book value) are:
(b) Revaluation surplus—OCI ($57,000 – 63,000 = $6,000; limit:
   $4,000 balance)���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
  Revaluation expense (to balance)�����������������������������������������������������������
  Accumulated depreciation ($38,000 – 42,000)���������������������������������
  Equipment ($95,000 – 105,000)������������������������������������������������������������

4,000
2,000
4,000
10,000

A decrease in fair value, as occurred in 2019, is expensed unless it reverses a revaluation
surplus account relating to the same asset, as in this illustration. So, of the $6,000 decrease
in value ($63,000 book value less $57,000 fair value), $4,000 is debited to the previously
created revaluation surplus and the remaining $2,000 is recorded as revaluation expense in
the income statement.
Investcorp, a provider and manager of alternative investment products headquartered in
London, prepares its financial statements according to IFRS. The following disclosure note
included in a recent annual report discusses the company’s method of valuing its building
and certain operating assets.
Premises and Equipment (in part)
The Bank carries its building on freehold land and certain operating assets at revalued
amounts, being the fair value of the assets at the date of revaluation less any subsequent
accumulated depreciation and subsequent accumulated impairment losses. Any revaluation
surplus is credited to the asset revaluation reserve included in equity, except to the extent
that it reverses a revaluation decrease of the same asset previously recognized in profit
and loss, in which case the increase is recognized in profit or loss. A revaluation deficit is
recognized directly in profit or loss, except that a deficit directly offsetting a previous surplus
on the same asset is directly offset against the surplus in the asset revaluation reserve.

The revaluation alternative is used infrequently. A recent survey of large companies that
prepare their financial statements according to IFRS reports that only 10 of the 160 surveyed
companies used the revaluation alternative for at least one asset class.10

Depletion of Natural Resources
Allocation of the cost of natural resources is called depletion. Because the usefulness of
natural resources generally is directly related to the amount of the resources extracted, the
activity-based units-of-production method is widely used to calculate periodic depletion.
Service life is therefore the estimated amount of natural resource to be extracted (for example, tons of mineral or barrels of oil).
The depletion base is cost less any anticipated residual value. Residual value could be
significant if cost includes land that has a value after the natural resource has been extracted.
The example in Illustration 11–9 was first introduced in Chapter 10 in Illustration 10–6.
In 2018, Jackson Mining Company has the following costs related to 500 acres of land in
Pennsylvania.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Payment for the right to explore for a coal deposit
Actual exploration costs for a coal deposit
Intangible development costs in digging and constructing the mine shaft.
Purchase of excavation equipment for the project
Restoration of the land for recreational use after extraction is completed, as
required by contract (determined using the expected cash flow approach)

$1,000,000
800,000

500,000
600,000
468,360

The company’s geologist estimates that 1,000,000 tons of coal will be extracted over a
three-year period. After the coal is removed from the site, the excavation equipment will be
sold for an anticipated residual value of $60,000. During 2018, 300,000 tons were extracted.

10

“IFRS Accounting Trends and Techniques” (New York, AICPA, 2011), p. 171.

Depletion of the cost of
natural resources usually
is determined using
the units-of-production
method.
● LO11–3

Illustration 11–9

Depletion of Natural
Resources


www.downloadslide.net
592

SECTION 2        Assets

In Illustration 10–6 we determined that the capitalized cost of the coal mine (natural
resource), including the expected restoration costs, is $2,768,360. Since there is no residual
value to the land, the depletion base equals cost and the depletion rate per ton is calculated
as follows:
Depletion base
Depletion per ton = ___________________
​   
    ​
Estimated extractable tons
​​    
​  ​ 
​
​​
$2,768,360
___________
Depletion per ton =   
​     ​ = $2.76836 per ton
1,000,000 tons
For each ton of coal extracted, $2.76836 in depletion is recorded. In 2018, the following
journal entry records depletion for the 300,000 tons of coal actually extracted.
Depletion ($2.76836 × 300,000 tons)�����������������������������������������������������������
Coal mine�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

The units-of-production
method often is used to
determine depreciation
and amortization on assets
used in the extraction of
natural resources.

830,508
830,508

Notice that the credit is to the asset, coal mine, rather than to a contra account, accumulated depletion. Although this approach is traditional, the use of a contra account is
acceptable.
Depletion is a product cost and is included in the cost of the inventory of coal, just as the
depreciation on manufacturing equipment is included in inventory cost. The depletion is
then included in cost of goods sold in the income statement when the coal is sold.
What about depreciation on the $600,000 cost of excavation equipment? If the equipment
can be moved from the site and used on future projects, the equipment’s depreciable base
should be allocated over its useful life. If the asset is not movable, as in our illustration, then
it should be depreciated over its useful life or the life of the natural resource, whichever is
shorter.
Quite often, companies use the units-of-production method to calculate depreciation and
amortization on assets used in the extraction of natural resources. The activity base used is
the same as that used to calculate depletion, the estimated recoverable natural resource. In
our illustration, the depreciation rate would be $0.54 per ton, calculated as follows.
$600,000 − 60,000
​Depreciation per ton = ​ _____________
  
  
 ​  = $0.54 per ton​
1,000,000 tons
In 2018, depreciation of $162,000 ($0.54 × 300,000 tons) is recorded and also included
as part of the cost of the coal inventory.
The summary of significant accounting policies disclosure accompanying recent financial statements of ConocoPhilips shown in Illustration 11–10 provides a good summary of
depletion, amortization, and depreciation for natural resource properties.

Illustration 11–10

Depletion Method
Disclosure—ConocoPhilips
Real World Financials

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (in part)
Depletion and Amortization—Leasehold costs of producing properties are depleted using
the units-of-production method based on estimated proved oil and gas reserves. Amortization of intangible development costs is based on the units-of-production method using estimated proved developed oil and gas reserves.
Depreciation and Amortization—Depreciation and amortization of PP&E on producing hydrocarbon properties and certain pipeline assets (those which are expected to
have a declining utilization pattern), are determined by the units-of-production method.
Depreciation and amortization of all other PP&E are determined by either the individual-unit-straight-line method or the group-straight-line method (for those individual units that
are highly integrated with other units).


www.downloadslide.net


CHAPTER 11         Property, Plant, and Equipment and Intangible Assets: Utilization and Disposition

593

Additional Consideration
Percentage Depletion
Depletion of cost less residual value required by GAAP should not be confused with
percentage depletion (also called statutory depletion) allowable for income tax purposes
for oil, gas, and most mineral natural resources. Under these tax provisions, a producer is
allowed to deduct the greater of cost-based depletion or a fixed percentage of gross income
as depletion expense. Over the life of the asset, depletion could exceed the asset’s cost. The
percentage allowed for percentage-based depletion varies according to the type of natural
resource.
Because percentage depletion usually differs from cost depletion, a difference between

taxable income and financial reporting income before tax results. Differences between
taxable income and financial reporting income are discussed in Chapter 16.

International Financial Reporting Standards
Biological Assets. Living animals and plants, including the trees in a timber tract or in a fruit
orchard, are referred to as biological assets. Under U.S. GAAP, a timber tract is valued at cost
less accumulated depletion and a fruit orchard at cost less accumulated depreciation. Under
IFRS, biological assets are valued at their fair value less estimated costs to sell, with changes
in fair value included in the calculation of net income.11
Mondi Limited, an international paper and packing group headquartered in
Johannesburg, South Africa, prepares its financial statements according to IFRS. The
following disclosure note included in a recent annual report discusses the company’s policy
for valuing its forestry assets.

● LO11–10

Owned Forestry Assets (in part)
Owned forestry assets are measured at fair value, calculated by applying the expected
selling price, less costs to harvest and deliver, to the estimated volume of timber on hand at
each reporting date.
Changes in fair value are recognized in the combined and consolidated income
statement within other net operating expenses.

Amortization of Intangible Assets
Let’s turn now to a third type of long-lived asset—intangible assets. As with other assets
we have discussed, we allocate the cost of an intangible asset over its service or useful life.
The allocation of intangible asset cost is called amortization. Below we distinguish those
intangible assets with finite versus indefinite useful lives. For the few intangible assets with
indefinite useful lives, amortization is inappropriate.

● LO11–4

Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization
Most intangible assets have a finite useful life. This means their estimated useful life is limited in nature. We allocate the capitalized cost less any estimated residual value of an intangible asset to the periods in which the asset is expected to contribute to the company’s
revenue-generating activities. This requires that we determine the asset’s useful life, its
amortization base (cost less estimated residual value), and the appropriate allocation method,
similar to our depreciating tangible assets.
USEFUL LIFE.  Legal, regulatory, or contractual provisions often limit the useful life of an
intangible asset. On the other hand, useful life might sometimes be less than the asset’s legal
11

“Agriculture,” International Accounting Standard No. 41 (IASCF), as amended effective January 1, 2016.

The cost of an intangible
asset with a finite useful
life is amortized.


www.downloadslide.net
594

SECTION 2        Assets

or contractual life. For example, the useful life of a patent would be considerably less than
its legal life of 20 years if obsolescence were expected to limit the longevity of a protected
product.
RESIDUAL VALUE.  We discussed the cost of intangible assets in Chapter 10. The
expected residual value of an intangible asset usually is zero. This might not be the case,
though, if at the end of its useful life to the reporting entity the asset will benefit another
entity. For example, if Quadra Corp. has a commitment from another company to purchase

one of Quadra’s patents at the end of its useful life at a determinable price, we use that price
as the patent’s residual value.
ALLOCATION METHOD.  The method of amortization should reflect the pattern of use
of the asset in generating benefits. Most companies use the straight-line method. We discussed and illustrated a unique approach to determining the periodic amortization of software development costs in Chapter 10. Recall that the periodic amortization percentage for
software development costs is the greater of (1) the ratio of current revenues to current and
anticipated revenues (percentage of revenue method), or (2) the straight-line percentage
over the useful life of the asset.
Intel Corporation reported several intangible assets in a recent balance sheet. A note,
shown in Illustration 11–11, disclosed the range of estimated useful lives.

Illustration 11–11

Intangible Asset Useful
Life Disclosure—Intel
Corporation
Real World Financials

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (in part)
Identified Intangible Assets (in part)
The estimated useful life ranges for identified intangible assets that are subject to amortization are as follows:
(in years)

Estimated Useful Life

Acquisition-related developed technology
Acquisition-related customer relationships
Acquisition-related brands
Licensed technology and patents

3–9

5–11
5–8
2–17

Like depletion, amortization expense traditionally is credited to the asset account itself
rather than to accumulated amortization. However, the use of a contra account is acceptable.
Let’s look at an example in Illustration 11–12.

Illustration 11–12

Amortization of Intangibles

Hollins Corporation began operations in 2018. Early in January, the company purchased a
franchise from Ajax Industries for $200,000. The franchise agreement is for a period of 10
years. In addition, Hollins purchased a patent for $50,000. The remaining legal life of the
patent is 13 years. However, due to expected technological obsolescence, the company
estimates that the useful life of the patent is only 8 years. Hollins uses the straight-line
amortization method for all intangible assets. The company’s fiscal year-end is December 31.
The journal entries to record a full year of amortization for these intangibles are as
follows:
Amortization expense ($200,000 ÷ 10 years)������������������������������������������
 Franchise����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
To record amortization of franchise

20,000

Amortization expense ($50,000 ÷ 8 years)������������������������������������������������
 Patent����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
To record amortization of patent

6,250

20,000

6,250
(continued)


www.downloadslide.net


CHAPTER 11         Property, Plant, and Equipment and Intangible Assets: Utilization and Disposition

595

(concluded)
Assume that Hollins decided to sell the patent on December 31, 2022 (five years after
acquisition), for $21,000.
The journal entries to update amortization of the patent in 2022, and to sell the patent
are as follows:
Amortization expense ($50,000 ÷ 8 years)������������������������������������������������
 Patent����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
To record amortization of patent in 2022

6,250

Cash�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
  Patent (account balance)*����������������������������������������������������������������������������
  Gain on sale of patent (difference)������������������������������������������������������������
To record sale of patent

21,000

6,250

18,750
2,250

*$50,000 − ($6,250 × 5 years)

Similar to depreciation, amortization is either a product cost or a period cost depending
on the use of the asset. For intangibles used in the manufacture of a product, amortization is
a product cost and is included in the cost of inventory (and doesn’t become an expense until
the inventory is sold). For intangible assets not used in production, such as the franchise cost
in our illustration, periodic amortization is expensed in the period incurred.

Intangible Assets Not Subject to Amortization
Intangible assets with an indefinite useful life are those with no foreseeable limit on the
period of time over which the asset is expected to contribute to the cash flows of the entity.12
In other words, there are no legal, contractual, or economic factors that are expected to limit
their useful life to a company. Because of their indefinite lives, these intangible assets are
not subject to periodic amortization.
For example, suppose Collins Corporation acquired a trademark in conjunction with the
acquisition of a tire company. Collins plans to continue to produce the line of tires marketed
under the acquired company’s trademark. Recall from our discussion in Chapter 10 that
trademarks have a legal life of 10 years, but the registration can be renewed for an indefinite
number of 10-year periods. Therefore, the life of the purchased trademark is initially considered to be indefinite and the cost of the trademark is not amortized. However, if after several
years management decides to phase out production of the tire line over the next three years,
Collins would amortize the remaining book value over a three-year period.
In 2015, Boeing Company reported indefinite-lived intangible assets (other than goodwill)

of $490 million. The company states that, “Indefinite-lived intangibles consist of brand and
trade names acquired in business combinations.” Illustration 11–13 provides another example
in a disclosure made by The Estee Lauder Companies Inc., in a recent annual report.
Other Intangible Assets
Indefinite-lived intangible assets (e.g., trademarks) are not subject to amortization and are
assessed at least annually for impairment during the fiscal fourth quarter, or more frequently
if certain events or circumstances warrant.

Goodwill is the most common intangible asset with an indefinite useful life. Recall that
goodwill is measured as the difference between the purchase price of a company and the fair
value of all of the identifiable net assets acquired (tangible and intangible assets minus the
fair value of liabilities assumed). Does this mean that goodwill and other intangible assets
with indefinite useful lives will remain in a company’s balance sheet at their original
capitalized values indefinitely? Not necessarily. Like other assets, intangibles are subject to
the impairment rules we discuss in a subsequent section of this chapter.
FASB ASC 350–30–35–4: Intangibles–Goodwill and Other–General Intangibles Other than Goodwill–Subsequent Measurement (previously “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (Norwalk, Conn.: FASB, 2001),
par. B45).
12

The cost of an intangible
asset with an indefinite
useful life is not amortized

Trademarks or tradenames
often are considered to
have indefinite useful lives.

Illustration 11–13

Indefinite-Life Intangibles

Disclosure—The Estee
Lauder Companies Inc.
Real World Financials
Goodwill is an intangible
asset whose cost is not
expensed through periodic
amortization.


www.downloadslide.net
596

SECTION 2        Assets

International Financial Reporting Standards
Valuation of Intangible Assets. IAS No. 38 allows a company to value an intangible asset
subsequent to initial valuation at (1) cost less accumulated amortization or (2) fair value, if
fair value can be determined by reference to an active market.13 If revaluation is chosen,
all assets within that class of intangibles must be revalued on a regular basis. Goodwill,
however, cannot be revalued. U.S. GAAP prohibits revaluation of any intangible asset.
Notice that the revaluation option is possible only if fair value can be determined by
reference to an active market, making the option relatively uncommon. However, the option
possibly could be used for intangibles such as franchises and certain license agreements.
If the revaluation option is chosen, the accounting treatment is similar to the way we
applied the revaluation option for property, plant, and equipment earlier in this chapter. Recall
that the way the company reports the difference between fair value and book value depends
on which amount is higher. If fair value is higher than book value, the difference is reported
as other comprehensive income (OCI) and then accumulates in a revaluation surplus
account in equity. On the other hand, if book value is higher than fair value, the difference is
expensed after reducing any existing revaluation surplus for that asset.

● LO11–10

Consider the following illustration:
Amershan LTD. prepares its financial statements according to IFRS. At the beginning of
its 2018 fiscal year, the company purchased a franchise for $500,000. The franchise has
a 10-year contractual life and no residual value, so amortization in 2018 is $50,000. The
company does not use an accumulated amortization account and credits the franchise
account directly when amortization is recorded. At the end of the year, Amershan chooses
to revalue the franchise as permitted by IAS No. 38. Assuming that the fair value of the
franchise at year-end, determined by reference to an active market, is $600,000, Amershan
records amortization and the revaluation using the following journal entries:
To record the revaluation
of franchise to its fair
value.

Amortization expense ($500,000 ÷ 10 years)�����������������������������������������
 Franchise���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

50,000

Franchise ($600,000 – 450,000)�����������������������������������������������������������������
  Revaluation surplus—OCI���������������������������������������������������������������������������

150,000

50,000
150,000

With the second entry Amershan increases the book value of the franchise from

$450,000 ($500,000 – 50,000) to its fair value of $600,000 and records a revaluation
surplus for the difference. The new basis for the franchise is its fair value of $600,000, and
the following years’ amortization is based on that amount. Thus, 2019 amortization would be
$600,000 divided by the nine remaining years, or $66,667.

Partial Periods
Only in textbooks are property, plant, and equipment and intangible assets purchased and disposed of at the very beginning or very end of a company’s fiscal year. When acquisition and
disposal occur at other times, a company theoretically must determine how much depreciation,
depletion, and amortization to record for the part of the year that each asset actually is used.
Let’s repeat the Hogan Manufacturing Company illustration used earlier in Illustration 11–3
but modify it in Illustration 11–14 to assume that the asset was acquired during the company’s
fiscal year.

Illustration 11–14

On April 1, 2018, the Hogan Manufacturing Company purchased a machine for $250,000.
The company expects the service life of the machine to be five years and the anticipated
residual value is $40,000. The machine was disposed of after five years of use. The company’s fiscal year-end is December 31. Partial-year depreciation is recorded based on the
number of months the asset is in service.

Depreciation Methods—
Partial Year

“Intangible Assets,” International Accounting Standard No. 38 (IASCF), as amended effective January 1, 2016.

13


www.downloadslide.net

CHAPTER 11         Property, Plant, and Equipment and Intangible Assets: Utilization and Disposition

597

Notice that no information is provided on the estimated output of the machine.
Partial-year depreciation presents a problem only when time-based depreciation methods
are used. In an activity-based method, the rate per unit of output simply is multiplied by the
actual output for the period, regardless of the length of that period.
Depreciation per year of the asset’s life calculated earlier in Illustration 11–3A,
Illustration 11–3B, and Illustration 11–3C for the various time-based depreciation methods
is summarized in Illustration 11–14A.

Year

Straight Line

Sum-of-theYears’-Digits

1
2
3
4
5
Total

$ 42,000
42,000
42,000
42,000

42,000
$210,000

$  70,000
56,000
42,000
28,000
14,000
$210,000

Double-Declining
Balance
$100,000
60,000
36,000
14,000
0
$210,000

Illustration 11–14A

Yearly Depreciation

Illustration 11–14B shows how Hogan would depreciate the machinery by these three
methods assuming an April 1 acquisition date.

Illustration 11–14B  Partial-Year Depreciation
Year

Straight Line

Sum-of-the-Years’-Digits

Double-Declining Balance

2018

$42,000 × ¾ = $ 31,500

$70,000 × ¾ = $ 52,500

$100,000 × ¾ = $ 75,000

2019

$ 42,000

$70,000 ×  ¼ = $ 17,500
+56,000 × ¾ =
42,000
$ 59,500

$100,000 ×  ¼ = $ 25,000
+60,000 × ¾ =  45,000
$ 70,000*

2020

$ 42,000

$56,000 ×  ¼ = $ 14,000
+42,000 × ¾ =
31,500
$ 45,500

$60,000 ×  ¼ = $ 15,000
+36,000 × ¾ =
27,000
$ 42,000

2021

$ 42,000

$42,000 ×  ¼ = $ 10,500
+28,000 × ¾ =
21,000
$ 31,500

$36,000 ×  ¼ = $    9,000
+14,000 × ¾ =   10,500
$ 19,500

2022

$ 42,000

$28,000 ×  ¼ = $   7,000
+14,000 × ¾ =
10,500

$ 17,500

$14,000 ×  ¼ = $

2023

$42,000 × ¼ = $ 10,500
Totals
$210,000

$14,000 ×  ¼ = $ 3,500
$210,000

3,500

$210,000

*Could also be determined by multiplying the book value at the beginning of the year by twice the straight-line rate: ($250,000 − 75,000) × 40% = $70,000.

Notice that 2018 depreciation is three-fourths of the full year’s depreciation for the first
year of the asset’s life, because the asset was used nine months, or ¾ of the year. The remaining one-fourth of the first year’s depreciation is included in 2019’s depreciation along with
three-fourths of the depreciation for the second year of the asset’s life. This calculation is
not necessary for the straight-line method because a full year’s depreciation is the same for
each year of the asset’s life.
Usually, the above procedure is impractical or at least cumbersome. As a result, most
companies adopt a simplifying assumption, or convention, for computing partial year’s
depreciation and use it consistently. A common convention is to record one-half of a full


www.downloadslide.net

598

SECTION 2        Assets

year’s depreciation in the year of acquisition and another half year in the year of disposal.
This is known as the half-year convention.14

Concept Review Exercise
DEPLETION AND
AMORTIZATION

Part A:

On March 29, 2018, the Horizon Energy Corporation purchased the mineral rights to a coal
deposit in New Mexico for $2 million. Development costs and the present value of estimated
land restoration costs totaled an additional $3.4 million. The company removed 200,000
tons of coal during 2018 and estimated that an additional 1,600,000 tons would be removed
over the next 15 months.
Required:

Compute depletion on the mine for 2018.
Solution:

Cost of Coal Mine:

($ in millions)

Purchase price of mineral rights
Development and restoration costs

$2.0
3.4
$5.4

Depletion:

$5.4 million
​Depletion per ton  = ​ ____________
  
   ​ = $3 per ton​
1.8 million tons *
*200,000 + 1,600,000

Part B:

2018 depletion = $3 × 200,000 tons = $600,000

On October 1, 2018, Advanced Micro Circuits, Inc., completed the purchase of Zotec Corporation for $200 million. Included in the allocation of the purchase price were the following
identifiable intangible assets ($ in millions), along with the fair values and estimated useful
lives:
Intangible Asset
Patent
Developed technology
Customer list

Fair value

Useful Life (in years)

$10

50
10

5
4
2

In addition, the fair value of acquired tangible assets was $100 million. Goodwill was
valued at $30 million. Straight-line amortization is used for all purchased intangibles.
During 2018, Advanced finished work on a software development project. Development
costs incurred after technological feasibility was achieved and before the product release
date totaled $2 million. The software was available for release to the general public on
September 29, 2018. During the last three months of the year, revenue from the sale of the
software was $4 million. The company estimates that the software will generate an additional $36 million in revenue over the next 45 months.
Required:

Compute amortization for purchased intangibles and software development costs for 2018.
Solution:

Amortization of Purchased Intangibles:
Patent
Developed technology
Customer list
Goodwill

$10 million / 5 = $2 million × 3⁄12 year = $0.5 million
$50 million / 4 = $12.5 million × 3⁄12 year = $3.125 million
$10 million / 2 = $5 million × 3⁄12 year = $1.25 million
The cost of goodwill is not amortized.

Another common method is the modified half-year convention. This method records a full year’s depreciation when the asset is
acquired in the first half of the year or sold in the second half. No depreciation is recorded if the asset is acquired in the second half of
the year or sold in the first half. These half-year conventions are simple and, in most cases, will not result in material differences from a
more precise calculation.
14