Chapter 20
Income
Inequality,
Poverty, and
Discrimination
McGrawHill/Irwin
Copyright © 2009 by The McGrawHill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter Objectives
•
•
•
•
Income inequality in the U.S.
Sources of income inequality
Income inequality since 1970
Economic arguments regarding
income inequality
• Poverty measurement and
incidence
• The U.S. income-maintenance
program
• Labor market discrimination
20-2
Facts About Income Inequality
• Average household income
– $66,570 in 2006
– Among highest in the world
• Distribution by quintiles
• Income mobility
– People change quintiles
• Government redistribution
– Taxes and transfers
20-3
Facts About Income Inequality
Distribution by Quintiles, 2006
(1)
Quintile
(2)
Percentage of
Total Income
(3)
Upper
Income Limit
Lowest 20%
3.4
$20,035
Second 20%
8.6
37,774
Third 20%
14.5
60,000
Fourth 20%
22.9
97,032
Highest 20%
50.5
No Limit
Total
100.0
Source: Bureau of the Census
20-4
Income Inequality
• Lorenz Curve and Gini Ratio
e
100
Lorenz Curve
Percentage of Income
80
(Actual Distribution)
Perfect Equality
60
A
d
B
40
c
20
b
0
Complete
Inequality
a
20
40
60
80
Percentage of Households
Gini Ratio =
f
100
Area A
Area A + Area B
20-5
Government Redistribution
100
Percentage of Income
80
60
Lorenz Curve
After Taxes and
Transfers
40
20
0
Lorenz Curve
Before Taxes and
Transfers
20
40
60
80
100
Percentage of Households
Impact of Government Taxes and Transfers
20-6
Causes of Income Inequality
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Ability
Education and training
Discrimination
Preferences and risks
Unequal distribution of wealth
Market power
Luck, connections, and
misfortune
20-7
Income Inequality Over Time
• Rising income inequality since
1970
• Causes of growing inequality
– Greater demand for highly skilled
workers
– Demographic changes
– International trade, immigration,
and decline in unionism
20-8
Income Inequality
Percentage Total Income Received by Top OneTenth of Receivers, Selected Nations 2007
0
10
20
30
40
50
Columbia
Brazil
South Africa
Guatemala
Mexico
United
States
Italy
Japan
Sweden
Germany
Source: United Nations, Human Development Report, 2007/2008
20-9
Equality Versus Efficiency
• The case for equality
– Maximizing total utility
• The case for inequality
– Incentives and efficiency
• The equality-efficiency tradeoff
20-10
Equality Versus Efficiency
Brooks’ Marginal
Utility From Income
Utility Gain
(Entire Blue Area)
a
Utility Loss
(Entire Red Area)
b’
a’
MUA
0
Marginal Utility
Marginal Utility
Anderson’s Marginal
Utility From Income
$2500 $5000
Income
b
0
MUB
$5000 $7500
Income
The Utility-Maximizing Distribution of Income
20-11
The Economics of Poverty
• Definition of poverty 2006
– Single person < $9,800
– Family of 4 < $20,000
– Family of 6 < $26,800
– 36.5 million Americans
– Poverty rate 12.3%
20-12
Incidence of Poverty
Poverty Rates Among Selected Population
Groups, 2006
0
10
20
30
Female Householders
African Americans
Hispanics
Foreign-Born (Not Citizens)
Children Under 18
Women
Total Population
Asians
Whites
Men
Persons 65 or Over
Married-Couple Families
Full-Time Workers
20-13
Source: Bureau of the Census, www.census.gov
The Economics of Poverty
• Poverty rate trends
– Significant decline 1959-1969
– Stable in 11-13% range since
– Rises with recession
• Measurement issues
– Arbitrary threshold
– Consumption vs. income
20-14
Income-Maintenance System
• Entitlement programs
– All those eligible receive aid
• Social insurance programs
– Social security and Medicare
– Unemployment compensation
• Public assistance programs
– Welfare
20-15
Public Assistance Programs
• Supplemental security income
• Temporary assistance for needy
families
• Food stamp program
• Medicaid
• Earned Income Tax Credit
20-16
Discrimination
• Inferior treatment
• Taste-for-discrimination model
– Prejudice people receive disutility
– Willing to pay to avoid
– Discrimination coefficient
– Prejudice and the market AfricanAmerican-White wage ratio
– Competition and discrimination
20-17
African-American Wage Rate
(Dollars)
Taste for Discrimination Model
Less
Discrimination
S
More
Discrimination
$9
8
6
D1
D3
D2
0
12
16 18
African-American Employment (Millions)
20-18
Discrimination
• Statistical discrimination
– Judged on average group
characteristics
– Labor market example
– Profitable, undesirable, but not
malicious
20-19
Discrimination
• Occupational segregation
– The crowding model
– Crowd certain groups into less
desirable occupations
– Effects of crowding
– Elimination of crowding
20-20
Occupational Segregation
By crowding women into one occupation (Z)…
Wage Rate
Occupation X
Occupation Y
M
B
M
B
Occupation Z
B
W
0
34
Quantity of Labor
(Millions)
Dz
Dy
Dx
0
34
Quantity of Labor
(Millions)
0
4 6
Quantity of Labor
(Millions)
Men enjoy higher wages in the other
occupations (X and Y)
20-21
U.S. Family Wealth
• Family wealth rose rapidly between
1995 and 2004
Median and Average Family
Wealth, 1995-2004 In 2004 Dollars
Year
Median
Average
1995
1998
2001
2004
$70,800
83,100
91,700
93,100
$260,800
327,500
421,500
448,200
20-22
U.S. Family Wealth
• Family wealth became more unequal
between 1995 and 2004
Percentage of Total Family
Wealth Held by Different
Percentile Groups, 1995-2004
Year
1995
1998
2001
2004
Percentile of Wealth Distribution
Bottom 90%
Bottom 10%
Top 1%
32.2%
31.4
30.2
30.5
67.8%
68.6
69.8
69.5
34.6%
33.9
32.7
33.4
20-23
Key Terms
• income inequality
• Lorenz curve
• Gini ratio
• income mobility
• noncash transfers
• equality-efficiency tradeoff
• poverty rate
• public assistance programs
• Supplemental Security Income
(SSI)
• Temporary Assistance for
Needy Families (TANF)
• food-stamp program
• Medicaid
• earned-income tax credit
• Discrimination (EITC)
• entitlement programs
• social insurance programs • taste for discrimination model
• discrimination coefficient
• Social Security
• statistical discrimination
• Medicare
• Unemployment
compensation
• occupational segregation
20-24
Next Chapter Preview…
The Economics
of Health Care
20-25