Tải bản đầy đủ (.pdf) (430 trang)

Diana of the crossways

Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (1.4 MB, 430 trang )


TheProjectGutenbergEtextofDianaoftheCrossways,Complete,byGeorge
Meredith#76inourseriesbyGeorgeMeredith
Copyrightlawsarechangingallovertheworld.Besuretocheckthecopyright
lawsforyourcountrybeforedownloadingorredistributingthisoranyother
ProjectGutenbergfile.
Weencourageyoutokeepthisfile,exactlyasitis,onyourowndisk,thereby
keepinganelectronicpathopenforfuturereaders.
Pleasedonotremovethis.
Thisheadershouldbethefirstthingseenwhenanyonestartstoviewtheetext.
Donotchangeoredititwithoutwrittenpermission.Thewordsarecarefully
chosentoprovideuserswiththeinformationtheyneedtounderstandwhatthey
mayandmaynotdowiththeetext.Toencouragethis,wehavemovedmostof
theinformationtotheend,ratherthanhavingitallhereatthebeginning.

**WelcomeToTheWorldofFreePlainVanillaElectronicTexts**
**EtextsReadableByBothHumansandByComputers,Since1971**
*****TheseEtextsWerePreparedByThousandsofVolunteers!*****
InformationoncontactingProjectGutenbergtogetetexts,andfurther
information,isincludedbelow.Weneedyourdonations.
TheProjectGutenbergLiteraryArchiveFoundationisa501(c)(3)organization
withEIN[EmployeeIdentificationNumber]64-6221541Findoutabouthowto
makeadonationatthebottomofthisfile.

Title:DianaoftheCrossways,Complete
Author:GeorgeMeredith
Edition:10


Language:English
Charactersetencoding:ASCII


ReleaseDate:September,2003[Etext#4470][Yes,wearemorethanoneyear
aheadofschedule][ThisfilewasfirstpostedonFebruary12,2002]

TheProjectGutenbergEtextofDianaoftheCrossways,Complete,byMeredith
************Thisfileshouldbenamedgm76v10.txtor
gm76v10.zip************
CorrectedEDITIONSofouretextsgetanewNUMBER,gm76v11.txt
VERSIONSbasedonseparatesourcesgetnewLETTER,gm76v10a.txt
ThisetextwasproducedbyDavidWidger<>
ProjectGutenbergEtextsareoftencreatedfromseveralprintededitions,allof
whichareconfirmedasPublicDomainintheUSunlessacopyrightnoticeis
included.Thus,weusuallydonotkeepetextsincompliancewithanyparticular
paperedition.
The“legalsmallprint”andotherinformationaboutthisbookmaynowbefound
attheendofthisfile.Pleasereadthisimportantinformation,asitgivesyou
specificrightsandtellsyouaboutrestrictionsinhowthefilemaybeused.

[NOTE:Thereisashortlistofbookmarks,orpointers,attheendofthefilefor
thosewhomaywishtosampletheauthor’sideasbeforemakinganentiremeal
ofthem.D.W.]

DIANAOFTHECROSSWAYS
ByGeorgeMeredith



1897

CONTENTS
BOOK1.I.OFDIARIESANDDIARISTSTOUCHINGTHEHEROINEII.

ANIRISHBALLIII.THEINTERIOROFMR.REDWORTHANDTHE
EXTERIOROFMR.SULLIVANSMITHIV.CONTAININGHINTSOF
DIANA’SEXPERIENCESANDOFWHATTHEYLEDTOV.CONCERNING
THESCRUPULOUSGENTLEMANWHOCAMETOOLATE.VI.THE
COUPLEVII.THECRISISVIII.INWHICHISEXHIBITEDHOWA
PRACTICALMANANDADIVININGWOMANLEARNTORESPECTONE
ANOTHER
BOOK2.IX.SHOWSHOWAPOSITIONOFDELICACYFORALADY
ANDGENTLEMANWASMETINSIMPLEFASHIONWITHOUTHURTTO
EITHER.X.THECONFLICTOFTHENIGHTXI.RECOUNTSTHE
JOURNEYINACHARIOT,WITHACERTAINAMOUNTOFDIALOGUE,
ANDASMALLINCIDENTONTHEROADXII.BETWEENEMMAAND
DIANAXIII.TOUCHINGTHEFIRSTDAYSOFHERPROBATIONXIV.
GIVINGGLIMPSESOFDIANAUNDERHERCLOUDBEFORETHE
WORLDANDOFHERFURTHERAPPRENTICESHIPXV.INTRODUCES
THEHON.PERCYDACIERXVI.TREATSOFAMIDNIGHTBELL,AND
OFASCENEOFEARLYMORNINGXVII.THEPRINCESSEGERIA
BOOK3.XVIII.THEAUTHORESSXIX.ADRIVEINSUNLIGHTANDA
DRIVEINMOONLIGHTXX.DIANA’SNIGHT-WATCHINTHE
CHAMBEROFDEATHXXI.THEYOUNGMINISTEROFSTATEXXII.
BETWEENDIANAANDDACIER:THEWINDEASTOVERBLEAK
LANDXXIII.RECORDSAVISITTODIANAFROMONEOFTHE
WORLD’SGOODWOMENXXIV.INDICATESASOULPREPAREDFOR
DESPERATIONXXV.ONCEMORETHECROSSWAYSANDACHANGE
OFTURNINGSXXVI.INWHICHADISAPPOINTEDLOVERRECEIVESA
MULTITUDEOFLESSONS

BOOK5.XXXVI.ISCONCLUSIVEASTOTHEHEARTLESSNESSOF
WOMENWITHBRAINSXXXVII.ANEXHIBITIONOFSOME



CHAMPIONSOFTHESTRICKENLADYXXXVIII.CONVALESCENCEOF
AHEALTHYMINDDISTRAUGHTXXXIX.OFNATUREWITHONEOF
HERCULTIVATEDDAUGHTERSANDASHORTEXCURSIONINANTICLIMAXXL.INWHICHWESEENATUREMAKINGOFAWOMANA
MAIDAGAIN,ANDATHRICEWHIMSICALXLI.CONTAINSA
REVELATIONOFTHEORIGINOFTHETIGRESSINDIANAXLII.THE
PENULTIMATE:SHOWINGAFINALSTRUGGLEFORLIBERTYAND
RUNINTOHARNESSXLIII.NUPTIALCHAPTER:ANDOFHOWA
BARELYWILLINGWOMANWASLEDTOBLOOMWITHNUPTIAL
SENTIMENT

Aladyofhighdistinctionforwitandbeauty,thedaughterofanillustrious
IrishHouse,cameundertheshadowofacalumny.Ithaslatterlybeenexamined
andexposedasbaseless.ThestoryofDianaoftheCrosswaysistobereadas
fiction.

DIANAOFTHECROSSWAYS
BYGEORGEMEREDITH
1897

BOOK1.
I.OFDIARIESANDDIARISTSTOUCHINGTHEHEROINEII.ANIRISH
BALLIII.THEINTERIOROFMR.REDWORTHANDTHEEXTERIOROF
MR.SULLIVANSMITHIV.CONTAININGHINTSOFDIANA’S
EXPERIENCESANDOFWHATTHEYLEDTOV.CONCERNINGTHE
SCRUPULOUSGENTLEMANWHOCAMETOOLATEVI.THECOUPLE
VII.THECRISISVIII.INWHICHISEXHIBITEDHOWAPRACTICAL
MANANDADIVININGWOMANLEARNTORESPECTONEANOTHER



CHAPTERI
OFDIARIESANDDIARISTSTOUCHINGTHEHEROINE
AmongtheDiariesbeginningwiththesecondquarterofourcentury,thereis
frequentmentionofaladythenbecomingfamousforherbeautyandherwit:‘an
unusualcombination,’inthedeliberatesyllablesofoneofthewriters,whois,
however,notdisposedtopersonalironywhenspeakingofher.Itisotherwisein
hiscaseandageneralflingatthesexwemaydeempardonable,fordoingas
littleharmtowomankindasthestoneofanurchincastuponthebosomof
motherEarth;thoughmenmustlooksomedaytohaveitreturnedtothem,
whichisacertainty;andindeedfullsurelywillouridle-handedyoungstertoo,in
hisriperseason;beheardcomplainingofastrangeassaultofwantonmissiles,
comingonhimheknowsnotwhence;forweareallofusdistinctlymarkedto
getbackwhatwegive,evenfromthethingnamedinanimatenature.
The‘LEAVESFROMTHEDIARYOFHENRYWILMERS’arestuddedwith
examplesofthedinner-tablewitofthetime,notalwaysworthquotationtwice;
forsmartremarkshavetheirmeasureddistances,manyrequiringtobeabrule
pourpoint,orwithinthrowofthepistol,tomakeithit;inotherwords,the
majorityofthemareaddresseddirectlytoourmuscularsystem,andtheyhave
noeffectwhenwestandbeyondtherange.Onthecontrary,theyreflect
sombrelyonthespringsofhilarityinthegenerationprecedingus;withdue
reserveofcredit,ofcourse,toananimalvivaciousnessthatseemstohave
wantedsosmallanincitement.Ouroldyeomanryfarmers—returningtotheir
bedsoverfernycommonsunderbrightmoonlightfromaneighbour’sharvesthome,easedtheirbubblingbreastswithareadyroarnotunakintoit.Stillthe
promptnesstolaughisanexcellentprogenitorialfoundationforthewittocome
inapeople;andundoubtedlythediarialrecordofanimputedpieceofwitis
witnesstothespoutingoflaughter.Thisshouldcomfortuswhileweskimthe
sparklingpassagesofthe‘Leaves.’Whenanationhasacknowledgedthatitisas
yetbutinthefisticuffstageoftheartofcondensingourpurestsensetogolden
sentences,areadierappreciationwillbeextendedtothegift:whichistostrike
notthedazzledeyes,theunanticipatingnose,theribs,thesides,andstunus,

twirlus,hoodwink,mystify,tickleandtwitch,bydexteritiesoflingualsparring
andshuffling,buttostrikerootsinthemind,theHesperidesofgoodthings.We
shallthensetapriceonthe‘unusualcombination.’Awittywomanisatreasure;


awittyBeautyisapower.Hassheactualbeauty,actualwit?—notsimplyatidal
materialbeautythatpassescurrentanyprettyflippancyorstaggering
pretentiousness?Grant.thecombination,shewillappearaveritablequeenofher
period,fitforhomage;atleastmeritingadispositiontobelievethebestofher,in
theteethoffoulrumour;becausethewelloftruewitistruthitself,thegathering
ofthepreciousdropsofrightreason,wisdom’slightning;andnosoulpossessing
anddispensingitcanjustlybeatargetfortheworld,howeverwellarmedthe
worldconfrontingher.Ourtemporaryworld,thatOldCredulityandstonehurlingurchininone,supposesitpossibleforawomantobementallyactiveup
tothepointofspiritualclarityandalsofleshlyvile;aguidetolifeandabiterat
thefruitsofdeath;bothopenmindandhypocrite.Ithasnotyetbeentaughtto
appreciateaqualitycertifyingtosoundcitizenshipasauthoritativelyasacresof
landinfeesimple,orcoffersofbonds,sharesandstocks,andamore
imperishableguarantee.Themultitudesofevilreportswhichittakesforproof,
aremarshalledagainstherwithoutquestionofthenatureofthevictim,her
temptressbeautybeingasufficientlypresumptivedelinquent.Itdoesnotpretend
toknowthewhole,ornakedbodyofthefacts;itknowsenoughforitsfurry
dubiousness;andexceptingthesentimentalofmen,arocket-headedhorde,ever
attheheelsoffairfacesforignition,andupstarringawayatahintof
tearfulness;exceptingfurtherbychanceasolidchampionman,orsome
generouswomancapableoffaithinthepeltedsolitaryofhersex,ourtemporary
worldblowsdirectEastonhershiveringperson.Thescandaliswarrantforthat;
thecircumstancesofthescandalemphasizethewarrant.Andhowcleversheis!
ClevernessisanattributeoftheselectermissionarylieutenantsofSatan.We
praytobedefendedfromhercleverness:sheflashesbitsofspeechthatcatch
menintheirunguardedcorner.Thewarystufftheirears,thestolidbidherbest

sayingsreboundonherreputation.Neverthelesstheworld,asChristian,
remembersitsprofessions,andaportionofitjoinstheburlyinmoralsby
extendingtoherarougholdcharitablemercifulness;betterthansentimental
ointment,buttheheaviestblowshehastobear,toacharacterswimmingforlife.
Thattheladyinquestionwasmuchquoted,theDiariesandMemoirstestify.
Hearsayaswellashearingwasatworktoproducetheabundance;anditwasa
noveltyinEngland,where(incompany)themenarethepointedtalkers,andthe
womenconversationallyfairCircassians.Theyare,ortheyknowthatthey
shouldbe;itcomestothesame.Happilyourcivilizationhasnotprescribedthe
veiltothem.Themuteshavehereandthereasketchorlabelattachedtotheir
names:theyare‘strikinglyhandsome’;theyare‘verygood-looking’;
occasionallytheyarenotedas‘extremelyentertaining’:inwhatmanner,is


inquiredbyacuriousposterity,thatinsomanymattersisleftunendinglyto
jumptheemptyandgapingfigureofinterrogationoveritsownfullstop.Great
ladiesmusttheybe,atthewebofpolitics,forustohearthemciteddiscoursing.
HenryWilmersisnotcontenttoquotethebeautifulMrs.Warwick,heattemptsa
portrait.Mrs.Warwickis‘quiteGrecian.’Shemight‘poseforastatue.’He
presentsherincarpenter’slines,withadabofschool-boxcolours,effectiveto
thosewhomtheKeepsakefashioncanstir.Shehasastraightnose,redlips,
ravenhair,blackeyes,richcomplexion,aremarkablyfinebust,andshewalks
well,andhasanagreeablevoice;likewise‘delicateextremities.’Thewriterwas
createdforpopularity,hadhechosentobringhisartintoourliterarymarket.
PerryWilkinsonisnotsoelaborate:hedescribesherinhis‘Recollections’asa
splendidbrune,eclipsingalltheblondescomingnearher:and‘whatismore,the
beautifulcreaturecantalk.’Hewondered,forshewasyoung,newtosociety.
Subsequentlyheisratherashamedofhiswonderment,andaccountsforitby
‘nothavingknownshewasIrish.’She‘turnsouttobeDanMerion’sdaughter.’
Wemayassumethathewouldhaveheardifshehadanywhiffofabrogue.Her

soundingoftheletterRatriflescrupulouslyisnoticedbyLadyPennon:‘And
last,notleast,thelovelyMrs.Warwick,twentyminutesbehindthedinner-hour,
andr-r-reallyfearingshewaslate.’
Afteralludingtothesoftinfluenceofherbeautyandingenuousnessonthe
vexedhostess,thekindlyoldmarchionessadds,thatitwasnowondershewas
late,‘forjustbeforestartingfromhomeshehadbrokenloosefromherhusband
forgood,andsheenteredtheroomabsolutelyhouseless!’Shewasnottheless
‘astonishinglybrilliant.’Herobservationswereoften‘sounexpectedlydrollI
laughedtillIcried.’LadyPennonbecameinconsequenceoneofthestanch
supportersofMrs.Warwick.
Otherswerenotsoeasilywon.PerryWilkinsonholdsabalancewhenitgoes
beyondaquestionofherwitandbeauty.HenryWilmersputsthecaseaside,and
takesherashefindsher.Hiscousin,thecleverandcynicalDorsetWilmers,
whosemethodofconveyinghisopinionswithoutstatingthemwasfamous,
repeatsontwooccasionswhenhernameappearsinhispages,‘handsome,lively,
witty’;andthestressedrepetitionofcalculatedbrevitywhileafieryscandalwas
abroadconcerningthelady,impliesweightysubstance—thereservationofa
constable’struncheon,thatcouldlegallyhaveknockedhercharacterdowntothe
pavement.Wehavenottoaskwhathejudged.ButDorsetWilmerswasa


politicalopponentoftheeminentPeerwhoyieldsthesecondnametothe
scandal,andpoliticsinhisdayflushedtheconceptionsofmen.Hisshort
referencesto‘thatWarwick-Dannisburghaffair’arenotverballymalicious.He
getswindofthetermsofLordDannisburgh’swillandtestament,notingthem
withoutcomment.Theoddnessoftheinstrumentinonerespectmayhaveserved
histurn;wehavenogroundsforthinkinghimmalignant.Thedeathofhis
enemycloseshisallusionstoMrs.Warwick.Hewasgrowingancient,andgout
narrowedthecirclehewhirledin.Hadheknownthis‘handsome,lively,witty’
apparitionasawomanhavingpoliticalandsocialviewsofherown,hewould

not,onefancies,havebeensostingless.OurEnglandexposesasorryfigurein
hisReminiscences.Hestruckheavily,roundandabouthim,whereverhemoved;
hehadbynatureatarnishingeyethatcastdiscolouration.Hisunadornedharsh
substantivestatements,excludingtheadjectives,givehisMemoirsthe
appearanceofabodyoffacts,attractivetothehistoricMuse,whichhaslearntto
esteemthosebrawnysturdygiantsmarchingclubonshoulder,independentof
henchman,inpreferencetoyourpanopliedknightswiththeirpuffysquires,once
herfavourites,andwind-fillingtohercolumns,ultimatelyfoundindigestible.
HisexhibitionofhisenemyLordDannisburgh,isoftheclassofnobleportraits
weseeswingingoverinn-portals,grosslyunlikeinlikeness.Thepossibilityof
theman’sdoingorsayingthisandthatadumbratestheimprobability:hehad
somethingofthecharactercapableofit,toomuchgoodsenseforthe
performance.Wewouldthinkso,andstilltheshadowisroundourthoughts.
LordDannisburghwasamanofministerialtact,officialability,Paganmorality;
anexcellentgeneralmanager,ifnogeniusinstatecraft.Buthewascarelessof
socialopinion,unbuttoned,andalaugher.Weknowthathecouldbechivalrous
towardwomen,notwithstandingtheperplexitieshebroughtonthem,andthisthe
Dorset-Diarydoesnotshow.
HischronicleislessmischievousasregardsMrs.Warwickthantheparagraphs
ofPerryWilkinson,agossippresentinganimageofperpetualchatter,likethe
waxen-facedstreetadvertizementsoflightandeasydentistry.Hehasnobelief,
nodisbelief;namesthepro-partyandthecon;recitesthecase,anddiscreetly,
over-discreetly;andpicturesthetrial,tellsthelistofwitnesses,recordsthe
verdict:sothecasewent,andsomethoughtonething,someanotherthing:only
itisreportedforpositivethataminiatureoftheincriminatedladywascleverly
smuggledovertothejury,andjuriessittingupontheseeases,eversincetheir
bedazzlementbyPhryne,asyouknow….Andthenherelatesananecdoteof
thehusband,saidtohavebeennotabadfellowbeforehemarriedhisDiana;and



thenamingoftheGoddessremindshimthatthesecondpersonintheindictment
isnoweverywherecalled‘Theelderlyshepherd’;—butimmediatelyafterthe
bridalbellsthishusbandbecamesourandinsupportable,andeithershehadthe
trickofputtinghimpubliclyinthewrong,orhelostallshameinplayingthe
churlishdomestictyrant.Theinstancesareincredibleofagentleman.Perry
Wilkinsongivesustwoorthree;oneontheauthorityofapersonalfriendwho
witnessedthescene;attheWarwickwhist-table,wherethefairDianawouldlet
loosehersilverylaughintheintervals.Shewashardlyoutofherteens,and
shouldhavebeendancinginsteadoffastenedtoatable.Adifferenceoffifteen
yearsintheagesoftheweddedpairaccountspoorlyforthehusband’sconduct,
howeversolemnabusinessthegameofwhist.Wereadthatheburstoutatlast,
withbittermimicry,‘yang—yang—yang!’andkilledthebrightlaugh,shotit
dead.Shehadoutragedthedecorumofthesquare-tableonlywhilethecards
weremaking.Perhapshertoo-deadensuingsilence,asofonestrivingtobring
backthethrobstoaslainbirdinherbosom,allowedthegapbetweenthe
weddedpairtobevisible,foritwasdatedbacktoprophecyassoonasthe
trumpetproclaimedit.
Butamultiplicationofsimilarinstances,whichcanservenootherpurposethan
thatofanapology,isamiserablevindicationofinnocence.Themorewehaveof
themthedarkertheinference.Indelicatesituationsthechattererisnoxious.Mrs.
Warwickhadnumerousapologists.Thosetrustingtoherperfectrectitudewere
rarer.Thelibertysheallowedherselfinspeechandactionmusthavebeentrying
toherdefendersinalandlikeours;forhere,andabletothrowitsshadowonour
giddyupper-circle,therigourofthegameoflife,relaxedthoughitmay
sometimesappear,wouldsatisfythestaidestwhist-player.Shedidnotwishitthe
reverse,evenwhenclaimingaspaceforlaughter:‘thebreathofhersoul,’asshe
calledit,andasitmaybefeltintheearlyyouthofalivelynature.She,
especially,withhermultitudeofquickperceptionsandimaginativeavenues,her
rapidsummaries,hersenseofthecomic,demandedthisaerialfreedom.
WehaveitfromPerryWilkinsonthattheunionofthedivergentcouplewas

likenedtoanotherunionalwaysinaCourtofLaw.Therewasadistinction;most
analogieswillfurnishone;andhereweseeEnglandandIrelandchangeingtheir
parts,untillater,afterthebreach,whentheEnglishmanandIrishwomanresumed
acertainresemblancetotheyokedIslands.
HenryWilmers,Ihavesaid,dealsexclusivelywiththewitandcharmofthe
woman.Hetreatsthescandalaswemightdoinlikemannerifherstoryhadnot


tobetold.Butthesearenotreportingcolumns;verylittleofitshalltrouble
them.Thepositionisfaced,andthatisall.Thepositionisoneofthebattles
incidenttowomen,theirhardest.Itasksformorethanjusticefrommen,for
generosity,ourcivilizationnotbeingyetofthepurest.Thatcryofhoundsather
disrobingbyLawisinstinctive.Sheruns,andtheygivetongue;sheisacreature
ofthechase.Letherescapeunmangled,itwillpassintherecordthatshedid
oncepubliclyrun,andsomeolddogswillpersistinthinkinghercunningerthan
thevirtuous,whichneverputthemselvesinsuchpositions,butplythedistaffat
home.Nevershouldreputationofwomantrailascent!Howtrue!andtruealso
thatthewomenofwaxworkneverdo;andthatthewomenofhappymarriages
donot;northewomenofholynunneries;northewomenluckyintheirarts.Itis
atestofthecivilizedtoseeandhear,andaddnoyappingtothespectacle.
ThousandshavereflectedonaDiarist’spowertocancelourBurialService.Not
alonethecleric’sgoodworkisupsetbyhim;butthesexton’saswell.Hehowks
thegrave,andtransformsthequietworms,busyonasinglepoorpeaceable
body,intowingedserpentsthatdisorderskyandearthwithadeadlyflightofzigzags,likemilitaryrockets,amongtheliving.Andifthesearegiventocrytoo
much,tohavetheirtendersentimentsconsidered,itcannotbesaidthatHistory
requirestheflayingofthem.AgoutyDiarist,asheergossipDiarist,maythus,in
thebequestofatrailofreminiscences,explodeourtemples(forourverytemples
havepowderinstore),ourtreasuries,ourhomesteads,alivewithdynamiticstuff;
nay,disconcertourinheritedveneration,dislocatetheintimateconnexion
betweenthetuggedflaxenforelockandatitle.

NosimilarblameisincurredbyHenryWilmers.Noblamewhatever,onewould
say,ifhehadbeenless,copious,ornotsosubservient,inrecordingthelady’s
utterances;forthoughthewitofawomanmaybeterse,quitespontaneous,as
thislady’sassuredlywashereandthere,sheisapttospinitoutofamuseful
mind,athertoilette,orbythelonelyfire,andsometimesitisimitative;admirers
shouldbewareofholdingituptothewitheringglareofprint:sheherself,
quotinganobscuremaximmonger,saysoftheselapidarysentences,thatthey
havemerely‘thevalueofchalk-eggs,whichlurethethinkertosit,’andtempt
thevacuoustostrainforthelike,onemightadd;besidesflatteringtheworldto
imagineitselfricherthanitisineggsthataregolden.HenryWilmersnotesa
multitudeofthem.‘Thetalkfelluponourbeingcreaturesofhabit,andhowfarit
wasgood:Shesaid:—Itistherethatweseeourselvescrutchedbetweenlove
grownoldandindifferenceageingtolove.’Criticearsnotpresentatthe
conversationcatchanechoofmaximsandaphorismsoverchannel,


notwithstandingafemininethrillintheironyof‘ageingtolove.’Thequotation
ranksratheramongthetestimoniestohercharm.
Sheisfresherwhenspeakingofthewarofthesexes.Foronesentenceoutof
many,thoughwefindittobebutthecleverliteraryclothingofacommon
accusation:‘MenmayhaveroundedSeraglioPoint:theyhavenotyetdoubled
CapeTurk.’
Itiswar,andonthemaleside,Ottomanwar:herexperiencereducedhertothink
sopositively.Hermainpersonalexperiencewasinthesocialclasswhichis
primitivelyvenatorialstill,canineunderitspolish.
SheheldabriefforherbelovedIreland.SheclosesadiscussionuponIrish
agitationbysayingratherneatly:‘YouhavetaughtthemitisEnglishaswellas
commonhumannaturetofeelaninterestinthedogthathasbittenyou.’
Thedogperiodicallyputsonmadnesstowinattention;wegatherthenthat
England,inanangrytremour,trieshimwithwater-grueltoprovehimsane.

OftheIrishpriest(andshewasnotofhisretinue),whenhewasdeemeda
revolutionary,HenryWilmersnoteshersaying:‘Beintunewithhim;heisinthe
keynoteforharmony.Heisshepherd,doctor,nurse,comforter,anecdotistand
fun-makertohispoorflock;andyouwondertheyseetheburninggatewayof
theirheaveninhim?Conciliatethepriest.’
Ithasbeenpartlydone,donelate,whenthepoorflockhavefoundtheir
doctoringandshepherdingatotherhands:their‘bulb-foodandfiddle,’thatshe
petitionedfor,tokeepthemfromacompleteshavingofftheirpatchofbogand
scrubsoil,withoutanyperceptionofthetremuloustransatlanticmagnificationof
thefiddle,andthesplittingdiscordofitslatestinspiritingjig.
Andshewillnothavetheconsequencesofthe‘wearifuloldIrishduelbetween
HonourandHungerjudgedbybreadandbutterjuries.’
ShehadneedtobebeautifultobetolerableindayswhenEnglishmenstood
moreopenlyforthestrongarmtomaintaintheUnion.Hertroopofenemieswas
ofhersummoning.
Ordinarilyhertopicswereofwiderrange,andthoseofawomanwhomixed
hearingwithreading,andobservationwithhermusings.Shehasnodoleful


ejaculatorynotes,ofthekindpeculiartowomenatwar,containingone-thirdof
speculativesubstancetotwoofsentimental—afemininepleafor
comprehensionandasquire;anditwasprobablythereason(asthereisno
reasontosupposeanemotionalcause)whysheexercisedherevidentswayover
themindofsoplainandstraightforwardanEnglishmanasHenryWilmers.She
toldhimthatshereadrapidly,‘agreatdealatonegulp,’andthoughtinflashes—
awaywiththemakersofphrases.Shewrote,sheconfessed,laboriously.The
desiretoprune,compress,overcharge,wasatormenttothenervouswoman
writingunderasharpnecessityforpayment.Hersongswereshotoffonthe
impulsion;prosewastheheavytask.‘Tobepointedlyrational,’shesaid,‘isa
greaterdifficultyformethanafinedelirium.’Shedidnottalkasifitwouldhave

beenso,heremarks.Oneisnotastonishedatherappearingan‘actress’tothe
flat-minded.Butthebasisofherwoman’snaturewaspointedflame:Inthe
fulnessofherhistoryweperceivenothinghistrionic.Capriciousorenthusiastic
inheryouth,shenevertrifledwithfeeling;andifshedidsowithsomeshowy
phrasesandoccasionallyprofferedcommonplacesingilt,asshewasmuch
excitedtodo,hermoodsofreflectionweredirect,alwayslargeandhonest,
universalaswellasfeminine.
Hersayingthat‘Awomaninthepilloryrestorestheoriginalbarkofbrotherhood
tomankind,’isnomorethanacryofpersonalanguish.Shehasgoldenapplesin
herapron.Shesaysoflife:‘WhenIfailtocherishitineveryfibrethefires
withinarewaning,’andthatdriveslikeraintotheroots.Shesaysoftheworld,
generously,ifwithtaperingidea:‘Fromthepointofvisionoftheangels,this
uglymonster,onlyhalfoutofslime,mustappearouroneconstanthero.’Itcan
bereadmaliciously,butabstain.
ShesaysofRomance:‘TheyoungwhoavoidthatregionescapethetitleofFool
atthecostofacelestialcrown.’OfPoetry:‘Thosethathavesoulsmeettheir
fellowsthere.’
Butshewouldhaveusawaywithsentimentalism.Sentimentalpeople,inher
phrase,‘fiddleharmonicsonthestringsofsensualism,’tothedelightofaworld
gapingformarvelsofmusicalexecutionratherthanformusic.Forourworldis
allbutasensationalworldatpresent,inmaternaltravailofasoberer,abraver,a
brighter-eyed.Herreflectionsarethustobeinterpreted,itseemstome.Shesays,
‘Thevicesoftheworld’snoblerhalfinthisdayarefeminine.’Wehavetoguard
against‘half-conceptionsofwisdom,hystericalgoodness,animpatient
charity’—againsttheelementarystateofthealtruisticvirtues,distinguishableas


thesicknessandwrithingsofouregoismtocastitsfirstslough.Ideaisthere.
Thefunnypartofitisourfindingitinbooksoffictioncomposedforpayment.
Manifestlythisladydidnot‘chameleon’herpenfromthecolourofher

audience:shewasnotoftheuniformedrankandfilemarchingtodrumandfife
asgallantinterpretersofpopularappetite,andgoingorgonetosoundlessness
andtheicyshades.
Touchesinwardarenotabsent:‘Tohavethesenseoftheeternalinlifeisashort
flightforthesoul.Tohavehadit,isthesoul’svitality.’Andalso:‘Palliationofa
sinisthehuntedcreature’srefugeandfinaltemptation.Ourbattleisever
betweenspiritandflesh.Spiritmustbrandtheflesh,thatitmaylive.’
Youareentreatedtorepressalarm.Shewasbypreferencelight-handed;andher
sayingoforatory,that‘Itisalwaysthemoreimpressiveforthespiceoftemper
whichrendersituntrustworthy,’islightenough.OnPoliticssheisrhetoricaland
swings:shewrotetospurajuniorpolitician:‘Itisthefirstbusinessofmen,the
schooltomediocrity,tothecovetouslyambitiousasty,tothedullardhis
amphitheatre,armsofTitanstothedesperatelyenterprising,Olympustothe
genius.’Whatawomanthinksofwomen,isthetestofhernature.Shesawtheir
existingpostureclearly,yetbelieved,asmendisinclinetodo,thattheygrow.
Shesays,that‘Intheirjudgementsuponwomenmenarefemales,voicesofthe
present(sexual)dilemma.’Theydesiretohave‘astillwoman;whocanmakea
constantsocietyofherpinsandneedles.’Theycreatebystoppageavolcano,and
areamazedatitseruptiveness.‘Welivealone,anddonotmuchfeelittillweare
visited.’Loveispresumablythevisitor.Ofthegreaterlonelinessofwomen,she
says:‘Itisduetotheprescribedcircumscriptionoftheirminds,ofwhichthey
becomeawareinagitation.Werethewallsaboutthembeatendown,theywould
understandthatsolitarinessisacommonhumanfateandtheonechanceof
growth,likespacefortimber.’Astothesensationsofwomenafterthebeating
downofthewalls,sheownsthatthemultitudeofthetimorouswouldyearnin
shiveringaffrightfortheoldprison-nest,accordingtothesageprognosticof
men;buttheflyingofavaliantfewwouldformavanguard.Andweare
informedthatthebeginningofamotivelifewithwomenmustbeinthehead,
equallywithmen(bynomeansatruismwhenshewrote).Alsothat‘mendonot
somuchfeartolosetheheartsofthoughtfulwomenastheirstrictattentionto

theirgraces.’Thepresentmarketiswhatmenareforpreserving:anobservation
ofstillreverberatingforce.Generallyinhercharacterofthefemininecombatant
thereisaturnofphrase,likeadimplenearthelipsshowingherknowledgethat
shewasutteringbutatartmeasureofthetruth.Shehadalwaystoomuch


lambenthumourtobethedupeofthepassionwherewith,asshesays,‘welash
ourselvesintothepersuasivespeechdistinguishingusfromtheanimals.’
TheinstancesofherdrolleryareratherhintedbytheDiaristsforthebenefitof
thosewhohadmetherandcouldinhaletheatmosphereataword.Drolleries,
humours,reputedwitticisms,arelikeodoursofroastmeats,pastwiththe
pickingofthejoint.Ideaistheonlyvitalbreath.Theyhaveitrarely,oriteludes
thechronicler.TosayofthegreaterraticandforsakenLadyA****,aftershehad
acceptedtheconsolationsofBacchus,thathernamewasproperlysignifiedin
asterisks‘asshewasnownightlyanAriadneinheaventhroughherGod,’sounds
tousaroundabout,withwitsomewhereandfunnowhere.Sittingattheroastwe
mighthavethoughtdifferently.PerryWilkinsonisnothappierincitingherreply
tohiscomplimentonthereviewers’unanimouseulogyofherhumourand
pathos:—the‘merryclownandpoorpantaloondemandedofusineveryworkof
fiction,’shesays,lamentingthewriter’scompulsiontogoonproducingthemfor
applauseuntilitisextremestagethatknockstheirknees.Weareinformedby
LadyPennonof‘themostamusingdescriptionofthefirstimpressionsofa
prettyEnglishsimpletoninParis’;andhereisanopportunityforludicrous
contrastoftheFrenchandEnglishstylesofpushingflatteries—‘pipingtothe
charmedanimal,’asMrs.Warwicktermsitinanotherplace:butLadyPennon
wasacquaintedwiththesillywomanofthepiece,andfoundheramusementin
the‘wonderfultruth’ofthatrepresentation.
Diaristsofamusingpassagesareunderanobligationtopaintusarealistic
revivalofthetime,orwemisstherelish.Theodouroftheroast,andmore,a
sliceofitisrequired,unlessthehumorousthingbepreternaturallyspiritedto

walktheearthasoneimmortalamonganumberlessnumerousthanthemythic
Gods.‘Hegivesgooddinners,’acandidoldcriticsaid,whenaskedhowitwas
thathecouldpraiseacertainpoet.Inanislandofchillsandfogs,coelumcrebris
imbribusacnebulisfoedum,thecomicandotherperceptionsaredependenton
thestirringofthegastricjuices.Andsucharevivalbyanyofuswouldbe
impolitic,wereitapossibleattempt,beforeoursystemsshallhavebeenfortified
byphilosophy.ThenmayitbeallowedtotheDiaristsimplytorelate,andwecan
copyfromhim.
Then,ah!then,moreover,willthenovelist’sArt,nowneitherblushlessinfant
norexecutiveman,haveattaineditsmajority.Wecanthenbeveraciously
historical,honestlytranscriptive.Rose-pinkanddirtydrabwillalikehavepassed
away.Philosophyisthefoeofboth,andtheirsillycancellingcontest,perpetually


renewedinashuffleofextremes,asitalwaysiswhereaphantasmfalseness
reigns,willnolongerbafflethecontemplationofnaturalflesh,smotherno
longerthesoulissuingoutofourincessantstrife.Philosophybidsustoseethat
wearenotsoprettyasrose-pink,notsorepulsiveasdirtydrab;andthatinstead
ofeverlastinglyshiftingthosebarrenaspects,thesightofourselvesis
wholesome,bearable,fructifying,finallyadelight.Dobutperceivethatweare
comingtophilosophy,thestridetowarditwillbeagiant’s—acenturyaday.
Andimaginethecelestialrefreshmentofhavingapuredecencyintheplaceof
sham;realflesh;asoulbornactive,wind-beaten,butascending.Honourablewill
fictionthenappear;honourable,afountoflife,anaidtolife,quickwithour
blood.Why,whenyoubeholdityouloveit—andyouwillnotencourageit?—or
onlywhenpresentedbydeadhands?Worsethanthatalternativedirtydrab,your
recurringrose-pinkisrebukedbyhideousrevelationsofthefilthyfoul;for
naturewillforceherway,andifyoutrytostifleherbydrowning,shecomesup,
notthefairestpartofheruppermost!PeruseyourRealists—reallyyour
castigatorsfornothavingyetembracedPhilosophy.Asshegrowsintheflesh

whendiscreetlytended,natureisunimpeachable,flower-eke,yetnottoo
decorativelyaflower;youmusthaveherwiththestem,thethorns,theroots,and
thefatbeddingofroses.Inthisfashionshegrew,sayshistoricalfiction;thus
doessheflourishnow,wouldsaythemoderntranscript,readingtheinneraswell
asexhibitingtheouter.
AndhowmayyouknowthatyouhavereachedtoPhilosophy?Youtouchher
skirtswhenyoushareherhatredoftheshamdecent,herderisionof
sentimentalism.Youareonewithherwhen—butIwouldnothaveyoua
thousandyearsolder!Gettoher,ifinnootherway,bythesentimentalroute:—
thatverywindingpath,whichagainandagainbringsyouroundtothepointof
originalimpetus,whereyouhavetobeunwoundforanotherwhirl;yourpointof
originalimpetusbeingthegrosslymaterial,notatallthespiritual.Itismosttrue
thatsentimentalismspringsfromtheformer,merelyandbadlyapingthelatter,—
fineflower,orpinnacleflame-spire,ofsensualismthatitis,coulditdoother?
andaccompanyingtheformerittraversestractsofdeserthereandthere
couchinginagarden,catchingwithonehandatfruits,withanotheratcolours;
imaginingasecretahead,andgoadedbyanappetite,sustainedbysheer
gratifications.Fiddleinharmonicsasitmay,itwillhavethesegratificationsat
allcosts.Shouldnonebediscoverable,atonceyouareattheCaveofDespair,
beneaththefunerealorbofGlaucoma,inthethickmidstofponiarded,slitthroat,rope-dependantfigures,placardedacrossthebosomDisillusioned,
Infidel,Agnostic,Miserrimus.Thatisthesentimentalroutetoadvancement.


Spiritualitydoesnotlightit;evanescentdreams:areitsoil-lamps,oftenwith
wickaskantinthesocket.
Athousandyears!Youmaycountfullmanyathousandbythisroutebeforeyou
areonewithdivinePhilosophy.Whereasasingleflightofbrainswillreachand
embraceher;giveyouthesavourofTruth,therightuseofthesenses,Reality’s
infinitesweetness;forthesethingsareinphilosophy;andthefictionwhichisthe
summaryofactualLife,thewithinandwithoutofus,is,proseorverse,plodding

orsoaring,philosophy’selecthandmaiden.Tosuchanendletusbendouraimto
work,knowingthateveryformoflabour,eventhisflimsiest,asyouesteemit,
shouldministertogrowth.Ifinanybranchofuswefailingrowth,thereis,you
areaware,anunfailingaboriginaldemocraticoldmonsterthatwaitstopullus
down;certainlythebranch,possiblythetree;andforthewelfareofLifewefall.
Youareacutelyconsciousofyonderoldmonsterwhenheismouthingatyouin
politics.Bewaryofhimintheheart;especiallybewaryofthedisrelishof
brainstuff.Youmustfeedonsomething.Matterthatisnotnourishingtobrains
canhelptoconstitutenothingbutthebodieswhicharepitchedonrubbishheaps.
Brainstuffisnotleanstuff;—thebrainstuffoffictionisinternalhistory,andto
supposeitdullistheprofoundestoferrors;howdeep,youwillunderstandwhen
Itellyouthatitistheveryfootballoftheholiday-afternoonimpsbelow.They
kickitforpastime;theyareintelligencesperverted.Thecomicofit,the
adventurous,thetragic,theymakedevilish,tokindletheirOgygianhilarity.But
—sharplycomic,adventurous,instructivelytragic,itisintheinterwindingwith
humanaffairs,togiveaflavourofthemoderndayrevivingthatofourPoet,
betweenwhomandusyawnTime’smosthollowjaws.Surelyweowealittleto
Time,tocheerhisprogress;alittletoposterity,andtoourcountry.Dozensof
writerswillbeinatyonderyawningbreach,ifonlyperuserswillrallytothe
philosophicstandard.Theyaresickofthewoodenypuppetrytheydispense,as
onaracecoursetotheroaringfrivolous.Well,ifnotdozens,half-dozens;gallant
pensarealive;onecanspeakofthemintheplural.Iventuretosaythatthey
wouldbesatisfiedwithadozenforaudience,foracommencement.Theywould
perishofinanition,unfed,unapplauded,amenabletothelawsperchanceforan
assaultontheirlastremainingpairofearsorheels,toholdthemfast.Butthe
exampleisthething;sacrificesmustbeexpected.Theexamplemight,one
hopes,createataste.Agreatmodernwriter,ofclearesteyeandhead,now
departed,capableinactivityofpresentingthoughtfulwomen,thinkingmen,
groanedoverhispuppetry,thathedarednotanimatethem,fleshthoughthey
were,withthefiresofpositivebrainstuff.Hecouldhavedoneit,andheisofthe

departed!Hadhedared,hewould(forhewasTitanenough)haveraisedtheArt


indignityonalevelwithHistory;toaninterestsurpassingthenarrativeof
publicdeedsasvividlyasman’sheartandbrainintheirunionexcelhisplain
linesofactiontoeruption.Theeverlastingpantomime,suggestedbyMrs.
WarwickinherexclamationtoPerryWilkinson,isderided,notunrighteously,by
ourgraverseniors.TheynamethisArtthepastureofidiots,amethodfor
idiotizingtheentirepopulationwhichhastakentoreading;andwhichsoon
discoversthatitcanwritelikewise,thatsortofstuffatleast.Theforecastmaybe
hazarded,thatifwedonotspeedilyembracePhilosophyinfiction,theArtis
doomedtoextinction,undertheshiningmultitudeofitsprofessors.Theyarefast
cappingthecandle.Instead,therefore,ofobjurgatingthetimidintrusionsof
Philosophy,invokeherpresence,Iprayyou.Historywithoutheristheskeleton
mapofevents:Fictionapictureoffiguresmodelledonnoskeleton-anatomy.But
each,withPhilosophyinaid,blooms,andishumanlyshapely.Todemandofus
truthtonature,excludingPhilosophy,isreallytobidapumpkincaper.Asmuch
aslegsarewantedforthedance,Philosophyisrequiredtomakeourhuman
naturecredibleandacceptable.Fictionimploresyoutoheaveabiggerbreastand
takeherinwiththisheavenlypreservativehelpmate,herinspirationandher
essence.Youhavetoteachyourimaginationofthefeminineimageyouhaveset
uptobendyourcivilizedkneesto,thatitmusttemperitsfastidiousness,shunthe
grossnessoftheover-dainty.Or,tospeakinthephilosophictongue,youmust
turnonyourself,resolutelytrackandseizethatburrower,andscrubandcleanse
him;bywhichprocess,duringthecourseofit,youwillarriveattheconception
oftherightheroicalwomanforyoutoworship:andifyouprovetobeofsome
spiritualstature,youmayreachtoanidealoftheheroicalfemininetypeforthe
worshipofmankind,animageasyetinpoeticoutlineonly,onourupperskies.
‘Sowelldoweknowourselves,thatweoneandalldeterminetoknowapurer,’
saystheheroineofmycolumns.Philosophyinfictiontells,amongvariousother

matters,oftheperilsofthisintimateacquaintancewithaflatteringfamiliarin
the‘purer’—apersonwhomorethanceasestobeofelsetousafterhisideal
shallhaveledupmenfromtheirflintandarrowheadcavernsto
intercommunicativedaylight.Forwhenthefictitiouscreaturehasperformedthat
serviceofhelpingtocivilizetheworld,itbecomesthemostdangerousof
delusions,causingfirsttheindividualtodespisethemass,andthentojointhe
massincrushingtheindividual.Wherewithletustoourstory,thefrothbeing
outofthebottle.


CHAPTERII
ANIRISHBALL
IntheAssemblyRoomsofthecapitalcityoftheSisterIslandtherewasapublic
Ball,tocelebratethereturntoErinofaBritishheroofIrishblood,afterhis
victoriousIndiancampaign;amightystrugglesplendidlyended;andtrulycould
itbesaidthatallErindancedtomeethim;butthiswasthepickofthedancing,
pastdisputethepickofthesupping.Outsidethosehallsthesuppingwasdonein
Lazarusfashion,mainlythroughanexcessivestrainingoftheorgansofhearing
andvision,whichimpartedthereadinessformore,declaredbyphysicianstobe
thestateinducingtosounddigestion.Someonespiedthefigureoftheheroat
thewindowandwasfed;someonlytohearthetalechewedthecudofit;some
toldofhavingseenhimmountthesteps;andsureitwasthatatanhourofthe
night,nomatterwhen,andnevermindadroportwoofcloud,hewouldcome
downthemagain,andhaveanIrishcheertofreshenhispillow.For‘tisIreland
givesEnglandhersoldiers,hergeneralstoo.Fartheraway,overfieldand
bogland,thewhiskiesdidtheirexcellentancientserviceofwateringthedryand
dryingthedamp,tothetoastof‘LordLarrian,Godblesshim!he’sanhonourto
theoldcountry!’andabitofasightofollow,hintsofastory,andloudlaughter,
adrink,adeepersigh,settlingintoconversationuponthebraveLordLarrian’s
deeds,andanIrishregimenthefavoured—hadnotastefortheenemywithout

thebackingofhis‘boys.’Nothe.Why,he’dnevermarchtobattleandtheynot
handy;becausewhenhestruckhestruckhard,hesaid.Andhehasawoundon
therighthipandtwofingersoffhislefthand;hasbledforEngland,toshowher
whatIrishmenarewhenthey’rewelltreated.
Thefineoldwarriorstandingattheupperendofthelongsaloon,tall,straight,
grey-haired,martialinhisaspectanddecorations,wasworthytobetheflag-pole
forenthusiasm.Hislargegreyeyeslightenedfromtimetotimeasheranged
themoverthefloatingcouples,anddroppedawordofinquirytohisaide,
CaptainSirLukinDunstane,agoodmodelofacavalryofficer,though
somewhatagiant,equallyhappywithhischiefinpassingthetroopsofanimated
ladiesunderreview.Henamedasmanyaswereknowntohim.Reviewing
womenexquisitelyattiredforinspection,allvariouslyandcharminglysmiling,
isareliefafterthemonotonousregimentsofmen.Irelandhaddoneherbestto
presenttheheroofherbloodanagreeablechange;andhetooexpresseda


patrioticsatisfactiononhearingthatthefacesmostadmiredbyhimwereofthe
nativeisle.Helookedupononethatcamewhirlinguptohimonayoung
officer’sarmandsweptoffintothecrowdoftops,foraconsiderablewhile
beforeheputhiscustomaryquestion.Shewasreturningonthespinwhenhe
said,
‘Whoisshe?’
SirLukindidnotknow.‘She‘sanewbird;shenoddedtomywife;I’llask.’
Hemanoeuvredafewstepscleverlytowherehiswifereposed.Theinformation
hegatheredforthebehoofofhischiefwas,thatthehandsomecreatureanswered
tothenameofMissMerion;Irish;agedsomewherebetweeneighteenand
nineteen;adearfriendofhiswife’s,andheoughttohaverememberedher;but
shewasachildwhenhesawherlast.
‘DanMeriondied,Iremember,aboutthedayofmysailingforIndia,’saidthe
General.‘Shemaybehisdaughter.’

Thebrightcynosureroundeduptohiminthewebofthewaltz,withherdark
eyesforLadyDunstane,andvanishedagainamongthetwistingcolumns.
Hemadehisway,handsomelybumpedbyanapologeticpair,toLadyDunstane,
besidewhomaseatwasvacatedforhim;andhetrustedshehadnotoverfatiguedherself.
‘Confess,’shereplied,‘youareperishingtoknowmorethanLukinhasbeenable
totellyou.Letmehearthatyouadmireher:itpleasesme;andyoushallhear
whatwillpleaseyouasmuch,Ipromiseyou,General.’
‘Ido.Whowouldn’t?’saidhefrankly.
‘ShecrossedtheChannelexpresslytodanceheretonightatthepublicBallin
honourofyou.’
‘Wheresheappears,thefirstpersonfallstosecondrank,andacceptsithumbly.’
‘Thatisgrandlyspoken.’
‘Shemakeseverythingintheroomdustroundablazingjewel.’


‘Shemakesapoetofasoldier.Well,thatyoumayunderstandhowpleasedIam,
sheismydearestfriend,thoughsheisyoungerthanI,asmaybeseen;sheisthe
onlyfriendIhave.Inursedherwhenshewasaninfant;myfatherandMr.Dan
Merionwerechums.WewerepartedbymymarriageandthevoyagetoIndia.
Wehavenotyetexchangedasyllable:shewassnappedup,ofcourse,the
momentsheenteredtheroom.Iknewshewouldbeatakinggirl:howlovely,I
didnotguess.Youareright,sheextinguishestheothers.Sheusedtobethe
sprightliestoflivingcreatures,andtojudgebyherletters,thathasnotfaded.She
‘sinthemarket,General.’
LordLarriannoddedtoeverythingheheard,concludingwithamockdoleful
shakeofthehead.‘Mypoorestsubaltern!’hesighed,inthetheatricalbut
cordiallymelancholystyleofgreenageviewingCytherea’smarket.
Hispoorestsubalternwasricherthanheinthewherewithaltobidforsuch
prizes.
‘WhatishernameinadditiontoMerion?’

‘DianaAntoniaMerion.Tonytome,Dianatotheworld.’
‘Shelivesoverthere?’
‘InEngland,oranywhere;whereversheistakenin.Shewilllive,Ihope,chiefly
withme.’
‘AndhonestIrish?’
‘Oh,she’sIrish.’
‘Ah!’theGeneralwasIrishtotheheelsthatnight.
Beforefurthercouldbesaidthefairobjectofthedialoguecamedartingonatrip
oflittleruns,bothhandsout,allherfaceonetendersparkleofasmile;andher
cryprovedthequalityofherblood:‘Emmy!Emmy!myheart!’
‘MydearTony!
Ishouldnothavecomebutforthehopeofseeingyouhere.’


LordLarrianroseandreceivedahurriedacknowledgementofhiscourtesyfrom
theusurperofhisplace.
‘Emmy!wemightkissandhug;we’reinIreland.Iburnto!Butyou’renotstill
ill,dear?Sayno!ThatIndianfevermusthavegone.Youdolookadashpale,my
own;you’retired.’
‘Onedancehastiredme.Whywereyousolate?’
‘Togivetheothersachance?Toproduceagreaterimpressionbysuspense?No
andno.IwroteyouIwaswiththePettigrews.Wecaughtthecoach,wecaught
theboat,wewereonlytwohourslatefortheBall;sowedidwonders.Andgood
Mrs.Pettigrewis,piningsomewheretocompleteheradornment.Iwasinthe
crush,spyingforEmmy,whenMr.Mayorinformedmeitwasthedutyofevery
Irishwomantodancehertoesoff,ifshe‘dbeknownforwhatsheis.Andtwirl!
amanhadmebythewaist,andIdyingtofindyou.’
‘Whowastheman?’
‘NottosavetheselimbsfromthelightedstakecouldItellyou!’
‘YouaretoperformaceremoniousbowtoLordLarrian.’

‘Chatterfirst!alittle!’
Thepleaforchatterwasdisregarded.Itwasvisiblethattheheroofthenight
hunglisteningandinexpectation.HeandtheBeautywerenamedtooneanother,
andtheychattedthroughaquadrille.SirLukinintroducedafellow-Harrovianof
olddays,Mr.ThomasRedworth,tohiswife.
‘Ourweather-prophet,meteorologist,’heremarked,tosetthemgoing;‘you
remember,inIndia,mypointingtoyouhisnameinanewspaper—letteronthe
subject.Hewasgenerallysafeforthecricketingdays.’
LadyDunstanekindlyappearedtocallittomind,andsheleduponthethemqueriedattimesbyanabrupt‘Eh?’and‘Ibegpardon,’formanifestlyhisgaze
andoneofhisears,ifnotthepair,weregiventotheyoungladydiscoursingwith
LordLarrian.Beautyisrare;luckilyisitrare,or,judgingfromitseffectonmen,
andtheverystoutestofthem,ourworldwouldbeinternallymoredistracted
planetthanwesee,totheperversionofbusiness,courtesy,rightsofproperty,and


therest.Sheperceivedanincipientvictim,ofthehundredssheanticipated,and
sheverytolerantlytalkedon:‘Theweatherandwomenhavesomeresemblance
theysay.Isittruethathewhoreadstheonecanreadtheother?’
LordLarrianhereburstintoabraveoldlaugh,exclaiming,‘Oh!good!’
Mr.Redworthknittedhisthickbrows.‘Ibegpardon?Ah!women!Weatherand
women?No;theonepointmorevariableinwomenmakesallthedifference.’
‘CanyoutellmewhattheGenerallaughedat?’
ThehonestEnglishmanenteredthetrapwithpromptitude.‘Shesaid:—whois
she,mayIaskyou?’
LadyDunstanementionedhername.
DaughterofthefamousDanMerion?Theyoungladymeritedexaminationfor
herfather’ssake.Butwhenremindedofherlaughter-movingspeech,Mr.
Redworthbungledit;heownedhespoiltit,andcandidlystatedhisinabilityto
seethefun.‘Shesaid,St.George’sChannelinagaleoughttobecalledSt.
Patrick’s—something—Imissedsomepoint.Thatquadrille-tune,the

Pastourelle,orsomething…’
‘ShehadexperienceoftheChannellastnight,’LadyDunstanepursued,andthey
both,whileinseemingconverse,caughtsnatchesfromtheirneighbours,duringa
pauseofthedance.
ThesparklingDianasaidtoLordLarrian,‘Youreallydeclinetomakeanyofus
proudwomenbydancingtonight?’
TheGeneralanswered:‘Imightdoitontwostilts;Ican’tonone.’Hetouched
hisveteranleg.
‘Butsurely,’saidshe,‘there’salwaysaninspirationcomingtoitfromitspartner
inmotion,ifoneofthemtakesthestep.’
Hesignifiedawoefulnegative.‘Mydearyounglady,yousaydarkthingstogrey
hairs!’
Sherejoined:‘IfwewereoverinEngland,andyoufixedonmethestigmaof


sayingdarkthings,Ishouldneverspeakwithoutbeingthoughtobscure.’
‘It’sbecauseyouflashtoobrightlyforthem.’
‘Ithinkitisratherthereminiscenceofthetooththatreceivedastonewhenit
expectedcandy.’
AgaintheGenerallaughed;helookedpleasedandwarmed.‘Yes,that‘stheir
way,that‘stheirway!’andherepeatedherwordstohimself,diminishingtheir
importanceashestampedthemonhismemory,butsoheartilyadmiringthe
lovelyspeaker,thatheconsideredherwitanhonourtotheoldcountry,andtold
herso.Irishprevaileduptoboiling-point.
LadyDunstane,notlessgratified,glancedupatMr.Redworth,whosebrows
boretheknotofperplexityoverastrongstare.He,too,stampedthewordsonhis
memory,toseesubsequentlywhethertheyhadavestigeofmeaning.Terrifically
precocious,hethoughther.LadyDunstane,inherquicksympathywithher
friend,readtheadversemindinhisface.Andherreadingofthemindwasright,
wrongaltogetherherdeductionofthecorrespondingsentiment.

Musicwasresumedtoconfusethehearingoftheeavesdroppers.
Theybeheldaquaintspectacle:agentleman,obviouslyanEnglishman,
approached,withtheevidentintentionofremindingtheBeautyofthenightof
herengagementtohim,andclaimingher,asitwere,inthelion’sjaws.He
advancedafoot,withdrewit,advanced,withdrew;eagerforhisprize,notoverenterprising;inaweoftheillustriousGeneralsheentertained—presumeably
quiteunawareofthepretender’spresence;whereuponavoicewasheard:‘Oh!if
itwasminuettingyoumeantbeforethelady,I’dneverhavedisputedyourright
toperform,sir.’Foritseemedthatthereweretwoclaimantsinthefield,an
IrishmanandanEnglishman;andtheformer,havingaliveliersenseofthe
situation,hungaloofinwaitingforhereye;thelatterdirectedhimselftostrike
bluntlyathisprey;andhecontinuedminuetting,nowrapidlyblinking,flushed,
angry,consciousofawkwardnessandatangle,incapableofextrication.He
begantoblinkhorriblyundertherailleryofhisrival.TheGeneralobservedhim,
butasanobjectremoteandminute,aflyorgnat.ThefaceofthebrilliantDiana
wasentirelydevotedtohimsheamused.
LadyDunstanehadthefaintlinesofadecorouslaughonherlips,asshesaid:
‘HowodditisthatourmenshowtosuchdisadvantageinaBall-room.Ihave


seenthemindanger,andtheretheyshinefirstofany,andoneisproudofthem.
Theyshouldalwaysbefacingtheelementsorinaction.’Sheglancedatthe
minuet,whichhadbecomeapetrifiedfigure,stillpalpitating,bentforward,an
interrogativereminder.
Mr.RedworthreservedhisassenttotheproclamationofanyEnglish
disadvantage.AwhiffofCeltichostilityintheatmosphereputhimonhismettle.
‘Whereverthemanistried,’hesaid.
‘Mylady!’theIrishgentlemanbowedtoLadyDunstane.‘Ihadthehonour…
SullivanSmith…atthecastle…’
Sherespondedtothesalute,andMr.SullivanSmithproceededtotellher,halfin
speech,halfindotsmostluminous,ofacivilcontentionbetweentheEnglish

gentlemanandhimself,astothepossessionoftheloveliestofpartnersforthis
particularensuingdance,andthattheyhadsimultaneouslymadearushfromthe
LowerCourts,namely,theircards,totheUpper,beingthelady;andMr.Sullivan
SmithpartlyfoundedhispreferableclaimonherIrishdescent,andonhis
acquaintancewithhereminentdefunctfather—oneoftheever-radiatingstarsof
hisquenchlesscountry.
LadyDunstanesympathizedwithhimforhisnotintrudinghisclaimwhenthe
youngladystoodpre-engaged,aswellasinhumorousappreciationofhis
imaginativelogic.
‘Therewillbedancingenoughaftersupper,’shesaid.
‘IfIcouldscoreonedancewithher,I’dgohomesupperlessandfeasted,’said
he.‘Andthat’snotsayingmuchamongthehordesofhungrytrooperstip-toefor
thesignaltothebuffet.See,mylady,thegentleman,aswecallhim;thereheis
workinghisgamutperpetuallyuptodacapo.Oh!butit’sasheeptryingtobe
wolf;he‘ssheep-eyedandhe‘swolf-fanged,patheticandlarcenous!Oh,now!
who’dbelieveit!—themanhasdared…I’dassoonthinkofcommitting
sacrilegeinacathedral!’
Themanwasactually;toquotehisindignantrival,‘breachingthefortress,’and
pointingouttoDianaMerion‘hernameonhisdirtyscrapofpaper’:ashocking
sightwhenthelady’srecollectionwasthesolepointtobeaimedat,andtheonly
umpire.‘Asifallofuscouldn’thavewrittenthat,andhadn’tdoneit!’Mr.
SullivanSmithgroaneddisgusted.Hehatedbadmanners,particularlyincases


Tài liệu bạn tìm kiếm đã sẵn sàng tải về

Tải bản đầy đủ ngay
×