Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (475 KB, 24 trang )
<span class='text_page_counter'>(1)</span><div class='page_container' data-page=1>
<b>VIETNAM NNAATTIIOONNAALL</b> <b>UUNNIIVVEERRSSIITTYY,,</b> <b>HHAANNOOII</b>
<b>U</b>
<b>UNNIIVVEERRSSIITYTY OFOF LALANNGGUAUAGGESES ANANDD ININTTEERRNNATATIIONONALAL STSTUUDDIIEES S</b>
<b>F</b>
<b>FACACUULLTTYY OFOF</b> <b>PPOSOSTT--GGRARADDUUATATEE STSTUUDDIIEESS </b>
<b>VIETNAM NNAATTIIOONNAALL</b> <b>UUNNIIVVEERRSSIITTYY,,</b> <b>HHAANNOOII</b>
<b>U</b>
<b>UNNIIVVEERRSSIITYTY OFOF LALANNGGUAUAGGESES ANANDD ININTTEERRNNATATIIONONALAL STSTUUDDIIEES S</b>
<b>F</b>
<b>FACACUULLTTYY OFOF</b> <b>PPOSOSTT--GGRARADDUUATATEE STSTUUDDIIEESS </b>
i
<b>DECLARATION </b>
I hereby certify the thesis entitled “Adapting speaking tasks in the textbook
Tieng Anh 10 to improve the effectiveness of speaking lessons at Thuong
Cat High School: A case study.” as my own study in the fulfilment of the
requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts at the University of Languages
and International Studies, Vietnam National University, Hanoi.
Signature
ii
<b>ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS </b>
I have benefited a great deal of support from a number of people during the time
carrying out this thesis.
I would like first and foremost to express my profound gratitude and appreciation to
my supervisor, Prof. Nguyễn Hòa for his invaluable and insightful comments, his
deliberate guidance and wholehearted supervision without which the thesis would
not have been possible.
My thanks are also offered to all my respected lecturers in the M.A course, Assoc.
Prof. Lê Hùng Tiến, Prof. Nguyễn Quang, Assoc. Dr. Lê Văn Canh, Assoc. Dr. Lâm
Quang Đông, Dr. Huỳnh Anh Tuấn…., for their informative and valuable lectures
that have enlightened my research path of the study.
Special acknowledgement is also given to my students from class 10D1 Thuong Cat
High School for their participation in the lessons. My appreciation is also extended
to my colleagues in the English Division of Thuong Cat High School for their
assistance and work sharing.
Last but not least, my heartfelt thanks go to my family and my close friends for their
iii
<b>ABSTRACT </b>
In the teaching context of Thuong Cat High School in Bac Tu Liem, Ha Noi, the
adaptation of speaking tasks in the textbook „Tieng Anh 10‟ is necessary because
teaching and learning speaking is not usually efficient. The students c an hardly take
part in speaking tasks seriously though they have the desire to speak English. This
mini action research is conducted in order to investigate how adapted tasks help
students of low level to get more involved in speaking, as well as improve their
language accuracy and fluency. Oral tests together with survey questionnaire and
observations are the main instruments of data collection. They are delivered to 40
grade-10 students to collect individual scores, their opinions about speaking tasks in
the textbook and their behaviors while doing speaking tasks. Based on the data,
together with advantages in methodology, the speaking tasks are adapted and
speaking activities are implemented as pilot teaching is employed to realize the
objectives of the action research. The results indicate that most of the adapted tasks
bring about some clear improvement in the students‟ participation and their
language proficiency without omitting available textbook tasks. Finally, some
iv
<b>LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS </b>
ESL/ EFL: English as Second/ Foreign Language
MC: Master Of Ceremonies
T: Teacher
Ss: Students
Gv: Giáo viên
v
<b>LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES </b>
Table 1: The students‟ motivation in learning English speaking
Table 2+3: The students‟ opinions about English speaking skills in the textbook
Tieng Anh 10
Table 4: The students‟ general evaluation of their current speaking lessons
Table 5: The students‟ participation in speaking lessons.
Table 6: Factors prevent the students from participating in speaking in the class.
Table 7: The students‟ opinion about the way their teacher taught English speaking
Table 8: The students‟ evaluation of their teacher‟s task adaptation
Table 9: The students‟ scores in the Pre-test.
Table 10: The students‟ opinions about the vocabulary relating to the topics in the
speaking tasks
Table 11+12: The students‟ opinions about the topics of speaking tasks
Table 13+14: The students‟ opinions about the speaking tasks
Table 15: The students‟ response to the adapted tasks for Unit 14
Table 16: The students‟ response to the adapted tasks for Unit 16
Table 17: The students‟ scores in Post-test after Unit 12
Table 18: The students‟ scores in Post-test after Unit 16
vi
Figure 2: The students‟ opinions about the textbook‟s topics in the textbook Tieng
Anh 10
Figure 3: The students‟ opinions about the textbook‟s speaking activities in the
textbook Tieng Anh 10
Figure 4: The students‟ general evaluation of their current speaking lessons
Figure 5: The students‟ participation in speaking lessons.
Figure 6: : Factors prevented the students from participating in speaking in the
class.
Figure 7: The students‟ opinion about the way their teachers taught speaking
Figure 8: The students‟ evaluation of their teacher‟s adaptation
Figure 9: The students‟ scores in the Pre-test.
Figure 10: The students‟ opinions about the vocabulary relating to the topics in the
speaking tasks
Figure 11: The students‟ opinions about the topic‟s familiarity of the speaking tasks
Figure 13: The students‟ opinions about the speaking tasks‟ ease
Figure 14: The students‟ opinions about the speaking tasks‟ interesting organization
Figure 15: The students‟ response to the adapted tasks for Unit 14
Figure 16: The students‟ response to the adapted tasks for Unit 16
Figure 17: The students‟ scores in the Post-test after Unit 12
vii
<b>TABLE OF CONTENTS </b>
<b>DECLARATION ...i </b>
<b>ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS... ii </b>
<b>AB STRACT ... iii </b>
<b>LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ... iv </b>
<b>LIST OF F IGURES AND TAB LES... v </b>
<b>TABLE OF CONTENTS ...vii </b>
<b>PART I: INTRODUCTION ... III </b>
<b>1. Rationale for the study ... III </b>
<b>2. Aims of the study ... IV </b>
<b>3. Research questions ... IV </b>
<b>4. Scope of the study... IV </b>
<b>5. Methods of the study ... V </b>
<b>6. Design of the study ... V </b>
<b>PART II: DEVELOPMENT ...VII </b>
<b>CHAP TER 1. LITERATURE REVIEW ...VII </b>
<b>1.1. The teaching of speaking ...VII </b>
<i><b>1.1.1.1. </b></i> <i><b>The role of spoken English ...VII </b></i>
<i><b>1.1.1.2. </b></i> <i><b>Nature of spoken discourse...VII </b></i>
<i><b>1.1.1.3. </b></i> <i><b>Functions of speaking ... VIII </b></i>
<i><b>1.1.1.4. </b></i> <i><b>Implications for teaching ...IX </b></i>
<i><b>b. Talk as transaction ... X </b></i>
<b>1.1.2. </b> <b>Related factors affecting students’ speaking ...XI </b>
viii
<i><b>1.1.2.2. </b></i> <i><b>Teachers ... XII </b></i>
<i><b>1.1.2.3. </b></i> <i><b>Learners ... XII </b></i>
<i><b>1.1.2.4. </b></i> <i><b>Materials ... Error! Bookmark not defined. </b></i>
<b>1.2. Tasks and task adaptation ... Error! Bookmark not defined. </b>
<b>1.2.1. </b> <b>Tasks in FL/SL learning and teaching ... Error! Bookmark not defined. </b>
<b>1.2.2. </b> <b>Task adaptation in FL/SL learning and teaching .Error! Bookmark not </b>
<b>defined. </b>
<i><b>1.2.2.1. </b></i> <i><b>The need of task adaptation ... Error! Bookmark not defined. </b></i>
<i><b>1.2.2.2. </b></i> <i><b>What is adaptation? ... Error! Bookmark not defined. </b></i>
<i><b>1.2.2.3. </b></i> <i><b>Reasons for adaptation ... Error! Bookmark not defined. </b></i>
<i><b>1.2.2.4. </b></i> <i><b>Approaches to task adaptation ... Error! Bookmark not defined. </b></i>
<b>1.3. Summary ... Error! Bookmark not defined. </b>
<b>CHAP TER 2. RESEARCH METHODS... Error! Bookmark not defined. </b>
<i><b>2.1.1. Setting of the study ... Error! Bookmark not defined. </b></i>
<i><b>2.1.2. The learners ... Error! Bookmark not defined. </b></i>
<i><b>2.1.3. Speaking materials ... Error! Bookmark not defined. </b></i>
<b>2.2. An action research ... Error! Bookmark not defined. </b>
<i><b>2.2.1. Applied steps ... Error! Bookmark not defined. </b></i>
<i><b>2.2.2. The adaptation of speaking tasks in Tieng Anh 10 ...Error! Bookmark not </b></i>
<b>defined. </b>
ix
<b>2.3.3. Instrument 3: Survey Questionnaire... Error! Bookmark not defined. </b>
<b>2.3.4. Instrument 4: Survey for Response to Adaptation ...Error! Bookmark not </b>
<b>defined. </b>
<b>2.3.5. Instrument 5: Class Observation Sheets ... Error! Bookmark not defined. </b>
<b>CHAP TER 3: DATA ANALYSIS ... Error! Bookmark not defined. </b>
<b>3.1. Data analysis of Preliminary Survey (See Appendix 1) .... Error! Bookmark </b>
<b>not defined. </b>
<b>3.1.1. Personal information of the students’ taking part in the survey ...Error! </b>
<b>Bookmark not defined. </b>
<b>3.1.2. The students’ awareness of studying English in general ...Error! </b>
<b>Bookmark not defined. </b>
<b>3.1.3. The students’ opinions about English speaking skills in the textbook </b>
<b>Tieng Anh 10... Error! Bookmark not defined. </b>
<b>3.1.4. The students’ evaluation of their current speaking lessons ...Error! </b>
<b>Bookmark not defined. </b>
<b>3.1.4.1. The students’ general evaluation of their current speaking lessons</b>
<b>... Error! Bookmark not defined. </b>
<b>3.1.4.2. The students’ participation in speaking lessons and the reasons ...Error! </b>
<b>Bookmark not defined. </b>
<b>3.1.4.3. The students’ opinions about the way their teachers taught English </b>
<b>speaking ... Error! Bookmark not defined. </b>
<b>3.2. Data analysis from initial observations (see appendix 5) .. Error! Bookmark </b>
<b>not defined. </b>
x
<b>3.4.1. In terms of language (vocabulary) ... Error! Bookmark not defined. </b>
<b>3.4.2. In terms of topic ... Error! Bookmark not defined. </b>
<b>3.4.3. In terms of speaking tasks ... Error! Bookmark not defined. </b>
<b>3.4.4. The students’ suggestions for the teacher’s adaptation of speaking tasks</b>
<b>... Error! Bookmark not defined. </b>
<b>3.5. Data analysis of Survey for response to adaptation (see Appendix 4) .Error! </b>
III
<b>PART I: INTRODUCTION </b>
<b>1. Rationale for the study </b>
In the past ten years, teaching English speaking at school has earned a lot of
attention and investment from both experts and teachers as well as learners and their
communities. The three main reasons must be: first, the key practical role of English
speaking has received the social awareness; second, modern information technology
has brought learners an easy access to native speakers‟ talks; third, many
methodology courses sponsored by the government have helped teachers to
approach some new teaching metho ds. As a result, students‟ speaking ability has
improved much in general.
Despite all of the above advantages, I see no much progress in the class I teach at
Thuong Cat High School. By observing, I notice most of my students hesitate to
participate in English speaking tasks. Even as the teachers have managed to engage
them in, their talks show some problems of using accurate and fluent language.
Some researchers have been particularly interested in the same situation in teaching
English skills and tried to improve it by adaptation (Phùng Thị Hoa Mơ, 2010;
Nguyễn Thị Trang, 2012). Ho wever, most of them conclude that poor textbooks and
students‟ low motivation are the main reasons. Whereas the students in my class of
10D1 confirm that they want to speak English much more than reading, writing,
grammar, and they find almost all the topics interesting. Moreover, the new set of
textbooks do have several strong points, which are available task-based contexts
and carefully guided communication practice.
Considering their English scores at the beginning of the course, I realize that most
of my students are of low level, some are better but no one is excellent. Therefore, I
do a preliminary research, search the Internet and read ESL/EFL studies. I find that
IV
distinctive. I wonder if I can help them by providing them with more language input
together with knowledge background, and by adapting some speaking tasks in the
<i>textbook „Tiếng Anh 10‟. I do hope that these changes will help them to have such </i>
achievements as participating more in speaking activities and producing somewhat
more accurate and fluent language.
<i>All of these above have inspired me to conduct the study titled “Adapting speaking </i>
<i>tasks in the textbook Tieng Anh 10 to improve the effectiveness of speaking lessons </i>
<i>at Thuong Cat High School: A case study.” </i>
<b>2. Aims of the study </b>
The study is aimed at improving the effectiveness of English speaking lessons for
the 10th grade students at Thuong Cat High School by means of the adaptation of
<i>speaking tasks in the textbook „Tieng Anh 10‟. </i>
<b>3. Research questions </b>
In order to achieve the mentioned aim, the following research question guided the
study:
<i>To what extent can the adapted tasks help improve the effectiveness of </i>
<i>speaking lessons? </i>
<b>4. Scope of the study </b>
Task adaptation is such a broad topic that it cannot be wholly discussed within the
framework of this paper; therefore, only one specific aspect will be central to the
speaking tasks‟ adaptation.
The study focuses on only one class of grade-10 students, so the results of the study
are not applied to all students at Thuong Cat High School or ones at other high
V
<b>5. Methods of the study </b>
<b>First, the study titled “Adapting speaking tasks in the textbook Tieng Anh 10 to </b>
improve the effectiveness of speaking lessons at Thuong Cat High School.” is a
case study. It is conducted in class 10D1 at Thuong Cat High School in Bac Tu
Liem, Hanoi City. 40 students of class 10D1 are all at the age of 17. All of them
have learnt English since they were at grade 3, but most of them are low-level
English speakers. Though they pay much attention to study English, their English is
<b>not very good in general and their speaking ability is of low level in particular. </b>
Second, the study is an action research. According to Nunan (1992: 19), an action
<i><b>research includes seven steps. They are: initiation, preliminary investigation, </b></i>
<i><b>hypothesis, intervention, evaluation, dissemination and follow-up. Details of these </b></i>
<i>steps will be presented in chapter 2 of Part II. </i>
The action research lasts during the second term from Unit 9 to Unit 16. It is about
18 weeks. Oral tests together with survey questionnaire and observations are the
main instruments of data collection. They are delivered to 40 grade-10 students to
collect individual scores, their opinions about speaking tasks in the textbook and
their behaviors while doing speaking tasks.
Based on the data, together with advantages in methodology, the speaking tasks are
adapted and speaking activities are implemented as pilot teaching is employed to
realize the objectives of the action research. Two approaches to adaptation that
<i>guide this research are making accuracy-based practice meaningful and adapting </i>
<i>fluency-based activities, Hedge (2000: 273- 281). </i>
<b>6. Design of the study </b>
<b>The study consists of three main parts namely Introduction, Development and </b>
VI
<b>In the first part, Introduction, the reasons for the research, aims, research </b>
questions, scope and methods of the study are mentioned.
<b>The second part, Development, contains three chapters: </b>
- Chapter One focuses on theoretical background of the study, which is about
features, and functions of spoken discourse, implications for teaching, and purposes
as well as two main approaches of adaptations: accuracy-based practice and
fluency-based activities.
- Chapter Two not only describes the case of the study at Thuong Cat High School
but also presents the applied steps of an action research in details and the
instrumentation of the study.
- Chapter Three deals with a comprehensive data analysis.
<b>The last part, Conclusion, provides the recapitulation, major findings and </b>
VII
<b>PART II: DEVELOPMENT </b>
<b>CHAPTER 1. LITERATURE REVIEW </b>
<b>1.1. </b> <b> The teaching of speaking </b>
In order to help students to develop their English speaking ability we need insights
about the nature of spoken discourse, so we will be able to find a useful
methodology to select and design appropriate classroom activities.
<b>1.1.1. Speaking </b>
<i><b>1.1.1.1. The role of spoken English </b></i>
The mastery of English speaking skills plays a very important role for many foreign
language learners. Consequently, learners tend to evaluate their success in language
learning as well as the effectiveness of their English lessons basing on how well
they feel they have improved in their speaking ability or proficiency.
In addition, teachers and textbooks make use of a variety of approaches in the
<i>teaching of oral skills, which shows that “ oral skills have hardly been neglected in </i>
<i>EFL/ESL courses” . Therefore, it is observed that “ how best to approach the </i>
<i>teaching of oral skills has long been the focus of methodological debate”, Richards </i>
(2009:21).
Reflecting on the textbook Tieng Anh 10, I think teachers can take a great deal of
advantages in methodology.
<i><b>1.1.1.2. Nature of spoken discourse </b></i>
According to McCarthy and Carter, 1997 (cited in Richards, 2009:21), it is recent
advances in discourse analysis that have revealed the nature of spoken discourse
and its differences from written discourse. Luoma, 2004 (cited in Richards,
VIII
<i> Conjoined short phrases and clauses </i>
<i> May be planned or unplanned </i>
<i> Employs more vague or generic words than written language </i>
<i> Employs fixed phrases, fillers and hesitation markers </i>
<i> Contains slips and errors reflecting on-line processing </i>
<i> Interactions are jointly constructed </i>
<i> Shows variation, reflecting speaker roles, speaking purpose, and the </i>
<i>context </i>
Among them, I pay much attention to the two following features:
<i>First, “spoken discourse is usually unplanned and often reflects the processes of </i>
<i>constructions”, Richards (2009:2). Thus, errors must be carefully chosen to be </i>
treated in order that the correction does not ruin fluency. In my opinion, errors that
impede communication s hould be directly corrected. Tricia Hedge (2000:289) gives
an example of such error: “ They ate smoked worm” is not immediately apparent as
“They ate smoked eel”, and “long trees” can be misunderstood as “tall trees”.
Besides, the assessment of fluency should be much more flexible, which will be
discussed in detail in the part of adaptation.
<i>Second, “interactions are jointly constructed”, which asks for shared background, </i>
active and intelligibility participation. It implies that in addition to fluency, acc uracy
must be put in consideration and speaking activities must be well designed so that
engaging students in can be successful. Moreover, the topic of speaking tasks in
textbooks should be familiar to students, or else some preparation must be made
before each lesson.
<i><b>1.1.1.3. Functions of speaking </b></i>
Richards uses a three-part framework, which is expanded from Brown and Yule‟s
IX
transaction, and talk as performance. Their forms and functions are quite different
and therefore they require different teaching approaches.
<i><b>a. Talk as interaction </b></i>
This refers to “conversation” which serves as primarily social function. The focus is
more on speaker‟s wish to present themselves other than on the message. Brown
and Yule, 1983 (cited in Richards, 2009:25) describe its main features as follows:
<i> Has a primarily social function </i>
<i> Is jointly constructed </i>
<i><b>b. Talk as transaction </b></i>
The focus of this kind of talk is on what is said or done. The message and making
oneself understood clearly and accurately are focused on rather than the participants
and their interacting manner.
Some main features are given by Richards (2009:29):
<i> It has a primarily information focus </i>
<i> Linguistic accuracy is not always important </i>
<i><b>c. Talk as performance </b></i>
This type of talk refers to public talk transmitting information in front of an
audience. According to Richards (2009:32), the main features of talks as
performance are:
<i> It reflects predictable organization and sequencing </i>
<i> Form and accuracy is important </i>
<i><b>1.1.1.4. Implications for teaching </b></i>
<i><b>a. Talk as interaction </b></i>
X
students at school, I think they should practice a wide range of topics to present
good images of themselves in situations which call for interaction talks.
Two simple activities Richards uses to practice topic management are “in the hot
seat” and “question time”. In the first activity, a student sits on a chair in front of the
class and makes a statement about something he or she did recently. The other
members of the class have to ask three or more questions about the topic which the
student has to answer quickly. Then another student takes the hot seat. With the
activity called question time, before students begin a lesson on a new theme, he
prepares up to 15 questions related to the theme and put them on a handout. First, he
asks students around the class to answer the questions quickly. Then students
practice asking and answering the questions in pairs.
<i><b>b. Talk as transaction </b></i>
In terms of the level of linguistic accuracy that students achieve when carrying out
tasks as transaction, some scholars like Thornbury,1998 and Kumaravadivelu,1991
state that practicing these tasks focuses on task accomplishment rather than
grammatical practice and a gradual modification of their language output over time
takes on more and more target-like forms. However, Higgs and Clifford, 1982 (cited
in Richards 2009:37) claim that communication tasks often develop fluency at the
expense of accuracy. Richards (2009:39) recognizes that low-level students often
heavily rely on vocabulary and memorized chunks of language while carrying out
communication tasks. Therefore, to improve the quality (accuracy and fluency) of
language produced as students practice, he suggests:
<i> Pre-teaching certain linguistic forms </i>
<i> Reducing the complexity of the task </i>
<i> Giving time to plan the task </i>
<i> Repeating performance of the task </i>
XI
According to Johns,1996 (cited in Richards, 2009:42), teaching this type of talk
requires a different teaching strategy which involves providing examples or models
of speeches, oral presentation, stories,etc through video or audio recordings or
written examples. Guiding questions are:
<i>What is the speaker‟s purpose? </i>
<i> Who is the audience? </i>
<i> What kind of information does the audience expect? </i>
<i> How does the talk begin, develop, and end? What moves or stages are </i>
<i>involved? </i>
<i> Is any special language used? </i>
<b>1.1.2. Related factors affecting students’ speaking </b>
Students‟ participation in classroom speaking activities and their English output can
be affected by a variety of factors originating from context, learners, teachers,
materials and classroom activities. In the following sections, some of the major
factors will be discussed.
<i><b>1.1.2.1. Context </b></i>
<i>Most of factors are “ outside the teacher‟s control but they will bear heavily on </i>
<i>decisions about choice of resources and classroom procedure” (Hedge, 2000:24). </i>
She mentions the following factors:
Social attitudes
Social attitudes towards English learning partly determine teachers‟ effort to
motivate students and exposure to the language as well.
Educational system
XII
<i>- The extent to which the materials in use train for public examinations </i>
<i>- The hours available for teaching </i>
<i>- The existence of institutional or departmental policies </i>
<i>- The physical constraints of the classroom </i>
<i>- Class size </i>
<i>- The resources available </i>
<i>- The cohesion that exists among English language teachers </i>
<i>- The status of teachers in the hierarchy </i>
<i>- The financial/contractual status of teachers </i>
<i>- The interest of management in continuing professional development </i>
Examination system
Examination system is a heavily constraining factor where examinations are
considered gatekeepers to higher education or good jobs. Teachers would be of high
risk not to train students for these.
<i><b>1.1.2.2. Teachers </b></i>
<i>Harmer, 1991 (cited in Hedge, 2000:26) identifies teachers‟ roles “as controller in </i>
<i>eliciting nationality words; as assessor of accuracy; as corrector of pronunciation; </i>
<i>as organizer in giving instructions for the pair work, initiating it, monitoring it, and </i>
<i>organizing feedback; as prompter while students are working together; and as </i>
<i>resource if students need help”. All of these are common to a wide range of </i>
classroom methods. Hedge (2000: 22-31) says that they can be seen in lesson plans
but only the ability to manage activities and interactions can put them in practice.
Only when teachers have competence in management of interaction can the
mentioned roles create beneficial conditions for language learning.
<i><b>1.1.2.3. Learners </b></i>
XIII
<b>REFERENCES </b>
<i>Hoàng Văn Vân (2008) Tiếng Anh 12. Hà Nội: Nhà Xuất Bản Giáo Dục. </i>
<i>Hoàng Văn Vân (2008) Tiếng Anh 11. Hà Nội: Nhà Xuất Bản Giáo Dục. </i>
<i>Hoàng Văn Vân (2008) Tiếng Anh 10. Hà Nội: Nhà Xuất Bản Giáo Dục. </i>
<i>Nguyễn Quốc Hùng, M.A. (2012) Dạy Tiếng Anh Trên Lớp. Hà Nội. </i>
<i>Arthea J. S. Reed, Verna E. Bergemann (2007) A Guide to Observation, </i>
<i>Participation, and Reflection in the Classroom. New York: Emily Barosse. </i>
<i>Bailey, K. M., Savage, L. (1994) New Ways in Teaching Speaking. Illinois: </i>
Pantagragh.
<i>Brown, J. D. (1988) Understanding Research in Second Language Learning. </i>
Cambridge: University Press.
<i>Carter, R., Nunan, D. (2001) The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to </i>
<i>Speakers of Other Language. Cambridge: University Press. </i>
<i>Cohen, L., Manion,L., Morrison, K. (2007) Research Methods in Education. </i>
New York: Routledge.
<i>Davies, P. (2000) Success in English Teaching. Oxford: University Press. </i>
<i>Ellis, R. (1997). The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials . ELT, </i>
51(1).
<i>Hadfield, C. (1999) Simple Speaking Activities. Oxford: University Press. </i>
<i>Hedge, J. T. (2000) Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford: </i>
University Press.
<i>Mitchell, R., Myles, F. (1998) Second Language learning theories. London: </i>
Arnold.
<i>Nunan, D. (1992) Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge: </i>
University Press.
<i>Richards, J. C. (2009) Teaching Listening and Speaking: From Theory to </i>
XIV
<i>Steinberg, R. G. (2008) Perfect Phrases for the TOEFL Speaking and Writing </i>
<i>Section. New York: McGraw-Hill. </i>
<i>Thaiss, C., Suhor, C. (1984) Speaking and Writing, K-12. The USA: LINC, Inc. </i>
<i>Tomlinson, B. (1998) Material Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: </i>
University Press.
Tomlinson, B. (1998b). Material Development in Language Teaching.
Cambridge: CUP.
<i>Wajnryb, R. (1992) Classroom Observation Tasks. Cambridge: University Press. </i>