Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (1.03 MB, 7 trang )
<span class='text_page_counter'>(1)</span><div class='page_container' data-page=1>
<b>\ Nl’ Jouiiiul u f Science, NĩailicihalÌLồ - Pliy.'iics 25 (2009) </b>
<i><b>3 3 4 N iịuyen Trai, H anoi. V ietnam</b></i>
<b>R cccivcd 10 Macrh 2009</b>
<b>A b s tr a c t Fc-Pl materials have been w idely prepared by vacuum e v a p o r a tio n technique. Rcccntly, </b>
<b>chcm ical and physicochcm ica! mcthixJs have been successfully used to make Fc-Pt nanoparticlcs, </b>
<b>Ihin films. This paper reported another physicochcm icaỉ method, nam ely sonoclcctrodcposition, to </b>
<b>produce Fe-Pt nanoparliclcs. In the sonoclcctrodcposilion, the elcctrodcposition proccss was </b>
<b>assisted with a sonicator. The Ti horn o f the sonicator played a roic as the calhodc on which Fc-Pt </b>
<b>nanoparticlcs were deposited. After a ccrtain lim e o f deposition, a sonic pulse was applied to </b>
<b>rciiiovc the particles frt)m the Ti catỉuxic. The com position o f Fe-Pt parlicics can he controlled by </b>
<b>chanuing th e c o n c e n tr a tio n </b> <b>o f F'e a n d Pt io n s in the c lc c tr o ly tc a n d th e d e p o s it io n v o lta g e . 1Ì1C </b>
<b>parliclc size can be adjusted by the lim e o f deposition. The as-dcpositcd Fc-Pt nanopariiclcs were </b>
<b>fcrromagnctic at room lempcraturc. upon annealing at 7(X)°C for I h under ÌI2 atmosphere, ihc </b>
<b>saturation magnetization and the cocrcivity o f the nanoparliclci: were </b> <b>im p r o v e d siunificantly. </b>
<b>SoiKKlcclrcxlcposilion is a promising technique to make large quantity o f Fc-Pt nanopurticlcs.</b>
<i>Kcy^vonl\:</i> I c T l , L1(J N l i u c l u i c , hu>clccHc>dcj>o.NÌliuii, l u a g i i c l i c u a i K t p u l l i c ĩ c h , l i a i d U i a ^ i i c l i c
<b>nuilcrials..</b>
<b>1. Introduction</b>
<b>FcPi alloy can be in either a disordered face-centered cubic (fee) phase in which the statistical </b>
<b>distribution of ihe Fe and Pt atoms is substitutionally random, or in a partially or complcteiy ordered </b>
<b>face-ccnlcred tetragonal (fct) phase in which Fe and Pt atoms occupy specific sites. The ordered phase </b>
<b>can change to the disordered phase and vice versa at elevate temperatures [1]. The fct FePt alloy </b>
<i><b>possesses excellent hard magnetic properties with the saturation magnetization, PiMs. of 1.4 T, the </b></i>
<i><b>CuiTÌe temperature, Tc, o f 750 K, and the crystalline anisotropy Ku of 7 MJ/m^ [2]. Despite the high </b></i>
<b>cost of Pt, FePt thin films or particles have been paid much attention for their use as ultrahigh density </b>
<b>magnetic storage media and microcleclronic mechanical system (MEMS) due to the mechanical and </b>
<b>chcmical stability of the ordered fct Llo structure. Beside the equiatomic composition FePt, the Fc3Pt </b>
<b>and FePt3 with L I2 structure and less preferred magnetic properties can exist. The ordered FePt </b>
<b>materials arc normally obtained from the disordered materials via the order-disordcr transition. But</b>
<i><b>N.ỊỈ, Liumg et ai. / VNU Jourfuil o f Science, M athematics</b></i><b> - </b><i><b>Physics 25 Ị2009) ĩ -7</b></i>
<b>sometimes the ordered phase can be obtained from pure Fe and Pt layers via the diiiusion of the twvo </b>
<b>materials at high temperatures [3].</b>
<b>There are several ways to make FePt nanostructured materials including physical techniques </b>sLic:h
<b>as mechanical deformation [3], arc-melting [4], vacuum evaporation (sputtering, thermal evaporatiorn) </b>
<b>[5, 6], laser ablation pulse [7], chemical methods [8-10], and physicochemical method such aas </b>
<b>electrodeposition [11. 12]. Up to now, the vacuum evaporation is the most used methocd </b>
<b>Electrodeposition is a promising way to obtain FcPt thin films because it is less expensive thain </b>
<b>physical methods, less complicated than chemical methods. But by this technique, it is difficult to gcet </b>
<b>nanoparticles with large quantity. Sonoelectrochemistry was developed to make nanoparticles [13]. Ii </b>
<b>combined the advantages o f sonochemistry and electrodeposilion. Sonochemistry is a very usefiul </b>
<b>synthetic method which was discovered as early as 1934 that the application of ultrasonic energ;>^ </b>
<b>could increase the rate o f electrolytic water cleavage. The effects of ultrasonic radiation on chcinicral </b>
<b>reactions are due to the very high temperatures and pressures, which develop in and around ihie </b>
<b>cleaning and degassing o f the electrode surface, and an increased reaction rate [15]. In this paper, wve </b>
<b>report the use o f the sonoelectrochcmical method for the preparation of FePt nanopaniclcs.</b>
<b>2. Experimental</b>
<b>The sonoelectrochemical device employed is similar to that described in ref. [16]. A titanium horrn </b>
<b>with diameter o f 1.3 cm acted as both the cathode and ultrasound emitter (Sonics v e x 750). Tine </b>
<b>electroactive part of the sonoelectrode was the planar circular surface at the bottom of the Ti horn. Avn </b>
<b>isolating plastic jacket covered the immersed cylindrical part. This sonoelectrode produced a soniic </b>
<b>pulse that immediately followed a current pulse. One pulse driver was used to control a galvanostiai </b>
<b>and the ultrasonic processor, which was adapted to work in the pulse mode. A home-made galvanostiat </b>
<b>(without using a reference electrode) was used to control the constant current regime. A platinum plaite </b>
<b>wivh a sq u are o f I cm^ w a s u se d as a co u n ter e le c tr o d e T h e current p u ls e wn*; ch n n g eil froiTi 1 5 to 110 </b>
<i><b>N .ỉ ỉ L u o n g e t a l / VNƯ Jou rnal o f Science, M athem atics</b></i><b> - </b><i><b>P h ysics 25 (2009)</b></i><b> / - 7</b>
<b>3. </b> <b>lỉLesults an d d iscu ssio n</b>
<b>TT’he chem ical com position o f the Fe-Pi nanoparticles was controlled by adjusting the current </b>
<b>derusỉitty (coư esp on din g to the applied voltage). W hen the current density o f 15 - 20 m A /cm ^ the </b>
<b>conr^-osition o f nanoparticles was close to the expected fequiatomic c o n ^ o sitio n (Table 1). At higher </b>
<b>curriemt densities, the atom ic percent o f Fe was higher because the standard elecừ od e potential Fe^VFe </b>
<b>(-0.4^4 V [ 17]) is more negative than that o f </b> <b>(0.742 V f 18]).</b>
<i><b>Tab'he 1. Chemical composition, magnetic properties o f the samples. J is ứie currait density, </b>to n </i><b>is Ulc deposition </b>
<b>linvc o f a pulse; Fe, Pt are ứie atomic pCTcent o f Fe and Pt in the samples, respectively; //c is Uie coercivity; Ms is </b>
<b>Naine</b> <i><b>J</b></i>
<b>(mA/cm’)</b>
<b>/on</b>
<b>(s)</b>
<b>Fe</b>
<b>fat. %)</b>
<b>Pt</b>
<b>(at. %)</b>
<b>//c</b>
<b>(kOe)</b>
<i><b>M,</b></i>
<b>(emu/g)</b>
<i><b>MJM,</b></i>
<b>SI</b> <b>30</b> <b>0.5</b> <b>69</b> <b>31</b> <b>5.0</b> <b>40</b> <b>0.26</b>
<b>S2</b> <b>25</b> <b>0.5</b> <b>61</b> <b>39</b> 6.0 <b>45</b> <b>0.36</b>
<b>S3</b> 20 <b>0.5</b> <b>52</b> <b>48</b> 6.1 <b>49</b> <b>0.41</b>
<b>S4</b> <b>15</b> <b>0.5</b> <b>45</b> <b>55</b> <b>8.5</b> <b>23</b> <b>0.70</b>
<b>S5</b> <b>15</b> 0.6 - - <b>9.1</b> <b>24</b> <b>0.72</b>
<b>S6</b> <b>15</b> <b>0.7</b> - - <b>8.5</b> <b>30</b> <b>0.4</b>
<b>S7</b> <b>15</b> 0.8 - - <b>8.7</b> <b>43</b> <b>0.4</b>
<b>As-prepared</b> <b>Annealed</b>
<b>%</b>
<i><b>ìữom</b></i>
<b>Fig. 1. TEM images o f tlic as-prcparcd (left) and annealed (right) FePt </b>
<b>nanoparticles </b>
<b>F ig u re 1 is the TEM im ages o f typical as-prepared and annealed sa n p les. Particle size o f the as- </b>
<b>prqỉ.ared FePt sam ple w as 5 - 1 0 nm. After annealing the particle s ừ e increased to 1 0 - 2 5 nm due to </b>
<b>the aggregation and particle growth. In addition, the size distribution o f the annealed particles was </b>
<b>larger than that o f the as-prq)ared samples.</b>
<i><b>N.H. Luong et oL / VNU Jounuil o f Science, Maíhemaĩics</b></i><b> - </b><i><b>Physics 25 (2009) 1-7</b></i>
<i><b>atomic weight is much less than that of Pt which is similar to the XRD result o f FePt foils prepared boy </b></i>
<b>cold deformation [20]. The Pt peaks in the as-prepared samples are broad due to the small size of thhe </b>
<b>particles. Using the Scherrer formula with the full width at half maximum of the strongest peak (11 1Í), </b>
<b>the mean particle size of Pt particles was deduced to be 5.2 nm which is much smaller than the particlle </b>
<b>size obtained from the TEM image. The particles were not disordered FePt but they can be formed boy </b>
<b>many small domains o f pure Fe and Pt. The formation of FePt by electrodeposition was not occurrecd </b>
<b>and may be ascribed to the large difference in the standard electrode potential of the </b> <b>annd</b>
<b>Pt'^^/Pt. Upon annealing, the formation o f the ordered Llo fct phase happened by the diffusion processs </b>
Annealed
As- prepared
20 3 0 4 0 5 0
<b>20 (degree)</b>
<b>Fig. 2. X R D patterns (Cu K a radiation) o f the as-prepared (bcỉttom) and annealed (top) </b>
<b>nanoparliclcs compared to those o f the intensities for L lo FcPt (pdf file 4 3 1 3 5 9 ) and for </b>
<b>Pt (marked by the astcricks, pdf file 04-0802). The fundamental peaks o f FcPl structure </b>
<b>w ere denoted b y ‘T ’ and the supcrlattice peaks were denoted by “s” .</b>
T (*C )
<b>Fig. 3. D SC ưacc for the FcPt nanoparticlcs (heating rate 10°c/m in ).</b>
<i><b>N.H. L u o n g e t al.</b></i><b> / </b><i><b>VNU Journal o f Science, M athem atics</b></i><b> - </b><i><b>P h ysics 25 (2009) 1-7</b></i>
<b>via th ie diffusion process o f Fe and Pt domains because the diffusion occurred at any teưỊìerature. Both </b>
<b>fundlaimental and superlattice reflections o f the </b>L l o <b>phase were presented in Fig. 2. There was a small </b>
<b>peak: next to the (1 1 1 ) m ain peak o f the </b>L l o <b>FePt w hich can b e assigned to the Pt-rich FePt phase - </b>
<b>FePtta.. The presence o f this phase can be explained b y the incorrplete diffusion betw een Fe and Pt </b>
<b>dorruaiins.</b>
<b>Fig. 4. Magnetic curves o f sample S4. The maximum </b>
<b>applied field was 13.5 kOe.</b>
<i><b>N.H. L u o n g e t al. / VNƯ Jou rnal o f Science, M athem atics</b></i><b> - </b><i><b>P h ysics 25 (2009) Ỉ -7</b></i>
<i><b>the magnetic squareness MJM^ reduced with J because o f the presence o f the FejPt. O f cou rsee, the </b></i>
<b>kink in the m agnetic curves w as more evident in the sam ples with high Fe content.</b>
t » 0 5 s
J {m A ^ fn *)
J = 1 5 m A/cm *
<b>Fig. 5. Dependaice o f magnetic squaraiess and coercivity on cuưent </b>
<b>density y (top) and deposition lime /on (bottom).</b>
<b>In another series o f s a n p le s, w e fixed the current density and change the d q )osition tim e ion.,. We </b>
<i><b>thought that by changing tau the size o f particles w ould change and therefore the niagnctic prupccrtici) </b></i>
<i><b>o f the particles w ould b e affected. After annealing, He did not change with </b></i> <b>as significantly a as A/f </b>
<b>d id The coercivity o f S4 - S7 was in the range from 8.5 kOe to 9 .1 kOe (T able 1 and Fig. 5). Thisis can </b>
<b>be explained by the fact that the chem ical c o n p o sitio n mainly depended on the current dennsity </b>
<b>M agnetic properties o f the s a n p le s S4 and S5 were alm ost the same. Sam ple S5 sh ow ed the 1 m ost </b>
<b>preferred hard m agnetic properties. The m agnetic squareness sh ow ed a sudden drop and </b>A/s <b>showAfcd a </b>
<b>sfrong change when the d q josition tim e was longer than 0.6 s as sh ow n in sam ple S 6 and S7 wA'hich </b>
<b>presented sứ on g ratio o f a soft m agnetic phase. In our experim ent, w e only used 0.08 </b> <b>mM </b>
<b>(coưesponding to 1 m M /l) </b> <b>in a bath o f 80 ml w hich was enough to m ake about 20 mg </b> <b>FePt </b>
<b>nanoparticles. For long deposirion time, the concentration o f </b> <b>in the electrolyte reddueed </b>
<b>significantly with time. Therefore, there were more </b> <b>ions d q )osited on the Ti hom than </b> <b>1 ions. </b>
<b>A s the result, there can b e m ore Fe in sam ples S 6 and S7 w hich caused their lo w m agnetic squareeness </b>
<b>and high </b>
<b>A/s-4. C onclusion</b>
<i><b>N .ỉỉ. Liumịị eĩ ciL / VNU J ou rm l o f Science, M aílicmaíics - Physics 25 (2009) 1-7</b></i>
<b>^showed a high coercivity of 9.1 kOe at room temperature. This method possesses some advantages </b>
<b>ccompared to common methods such as simple preparation, low-cost equipment and easy scale-up.</b>
<b>A cknow ledgm ents. This work is supported by the Key Project QGTD.08.05 of Vietnam National </b>
<b>I University, Hanoi and the European Commission Project Selectnano-TTC (Contract No. 516922). The </b>
<b>; authors would like to thank Prof. Le Van Vu for XRD measurements and Mr. Pham Van Dinh for </b>
<b>texperimental assistance.</b>
<b>1 References</b>
<b>KM </b> <i><b>J.p. Liu, c.p . Kuo, Y. Liu, D.J. Scllmycr, Appi. Phys. U tt. 72 (1998)483.</b></i>
<i><b>ị [2] </b></i> <i><b>A. Ccbollada. R.F.C. Faưow, M.F. Toney, in: H.s. Nalwa (Ed.), Magnetic Nanostructure, American Scientific, (2002) </b></i>
<b>93.</b>
<b>I [3] </b> <i><b>N il. Hai. N.M. Dempsey, M. Veron, M. Vcrtlicr, D. Givord, J. Magn. Afagn Mater. 257 (2003) L139.</b></i>
<b>114] </b> <i><b>Q.l. Xiao. P.D. Thang, E. Briick, F.R. dc Boer, and K.H.J. Buschow, Appi Phys. U it. 78 (2001) 3672.</b></i>
<b>[.^1 </b> <i><b>N.TT. Van, N.H. Hai. N.H. Luong, v .v . llicp, N. Chau. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 52 (2008) 1435 </b></i>
<b>[(iỊ </b> <i><b>N.H. Luong, v .v . Hicp, D.M Hong, N. Chau, N.D. Linh, M. Kurisu, D.T.K. Anh, G. Nakamoto, J. Magn Magn. </b></i>
<i><b>Sícưer. 290-291 (2005) 559.</b></i>
<b>[7Ị </b> <b>L.J. Qiu, J. Ding. A .o. AJcyeyc, J.H. Yin, i.s . Chen, s. Goolaup, N. Singh, IEEE Traiis. Magn. 43 (2007) 2157.</b>
<b>[81 </b> <i><b>S. Saua, s. Macnosono, Chem. Siaier. 17 (2005) 3705.</b></i>
<b>[9] </b> <i><b>R. Harpcncss, A. Gedaiikcn. J. Mater. Chem. 15 (2iX)5) 698.</b></i>
<i><b>[10] S. Sun. C.B. Murray, D. Weller, L. Folks, A. Moser, Science 287 (2000) 1989.</b></i>
<i><b>[11] K. Zuzck Ro/Jiian, A. Krause, K. Ix’isiner, s. Fahler, L. Schultz, H. Schlorb, J. Masn. Magn. Mater. 314 (2(X)7) 116.</b></i>
<i><b>[121 F.M.i-. Rhcn, G. ilinJs, c . O'Reilly, IM .D . Cc)cy. IEEE Trans. Magn. 39 (2003) </b></i> <b>2699.</b>
<i><b>[131 A. Gcdankcn, in D. BahaJur, s. Vitla, o. Prakash (Ed.), ỉtĩorqanìc Materials: ReceiU Advances, (2004) 302.</b></i>
<i><b>[141 K.s. Suslick, S.B. Choc, A.A. Cicliowlas, MW. Grinstaff. Nature 354 (1991) 414.</b></i>
<i><b>115] T.J. Mason. J.p. Walton, D.j. Loriincr, Uiinmmics 28 (1990) 333.</b></i>
<i><b>116Ị J.J. Zhu, ST . Aruiia, Yu. Koll>pin, A. Gedankcn, Chem. Mater. 12 (2000) 143. </b></i>
<b>i 17Ị p Aikins. Plivsical Chemistry. Í 19*)7) 6th edition (W.H. Freeman and Company, New York).</b>
<i><b>[18] A.J. ỉỉard, L.R Faulkner. ElccưtK^hcmicul McthtxJs. Fundamentals and AppiicatiotLs, 2(X)1, 2nd edition (John Wiley </b></i>
<b>and Sons Inc).</b>
<i><b>Ị19] Ọ. Zcng, Y. Zhang, H.L. Wang, V. Papacithymiou, G .c. Hadjipanayis, J. Magn. Maijn. Maler. 272-276 (2004) cI223. </b></i>
<i><b>1201 NMI. Ilai, N.M. Dempsey. D. Givord. / MciỊỉn. MaỊỊn. Mciĩer, 262 (2003) 353.</b></i>
<i><b>[211 J. Lyubina, o . GutHcisch, Raỉph Skomski. K.-H. Muller, L. Schultz, Scripta Mater. 53 (2CX)5) 469.</b></i>