VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HANOI
INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL
GRADUATION PROJECT
The Readiness of International School in facing pandemic NCOVI-19 Assessment, Findings, and Recommendation for future quick reaction
Student’s name: Nguyen Ngoc Tu Anh
Hanoi - 2020
VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HANOI
INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL
GRADUATION PROJECT
The Readiness of International School in facing pandemic NCOVI-19 Assessment, Findings, and Recommendation for future quick reaction
STUDENT: Nguyen Ngoc Tu Anh
SUPERVISOR: Hung P. Nguyen (PhD)
STUDENT ID: 16071003
COHORT: IB2016C
MAJOR: International Business
Hanoi - 2020
LETTER OF DECLARATION
I hereby declare that the Graduation Project “The Readiness of International School in
facing pandemic NCOVI-19 - Assessment, Findings, and Recommendation for future quick
reaction” is the consequences of my own study and has never been published in any other
works. All references in this paper are transparently cited according to rules.
I take full responsibility for the fidelity of all data and contents of this research paper.
Hanoi, 23rd May 2020
Nguyen Ngoc Tu Anh
i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
First of all, I would like to express my deep gratitude my parents and other family members
have supported and created favorable conditions for me during the past time and especially
during my graduation project.
The second, I would like to express my gratitude and sincere thanks to Hung P. Nguyen,
the person who directly guides the dissertation, dedicated and instructed me to find the
direction of research, practical approach, document search, data processing and analysis,
problem solving, then I can complete my graduate thesis.
In addition, during the process of studying, researching and carrying out the topic, I also
received a lot of attention, suggestions and valuable support from teachers, colleagues,
friends and relatives. I would like to express my deep gratitude to International School
teachers has conveyed to me the useful knowledge during the past four school years, to my
friends and colleagues always encourage and support me in the process of studying and
researching, and the students of the International School has enthusiastically participated
in answering research interviews for the topic.
Sincerely,
Nguyen Ngoc Tu Anh
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LETTER OF DECLARATION ............................................................................................... i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...................................................................................................... ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS .........................................................................................................iii
LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................... vi
LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................. vii
LIST OF ABBREVIATION.................................................................................................. viii
ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................ ix
CHAPTER 1:
INTRODUCTION........................................................................................... 1
1.1
Background of the case study.......................................................................................... 1
1.2
Research objective ............................................................................................................ 2
1.3
Research questions............................................................................................................ 2
1.4
Structure of thesis ............................................................................................................. 3
CHAPTER 2:
LITERATURE REVIEW............................................................................... 4
2.1
University reactions toward Pandemic worldwide ....................................................... 4
2.2
Issues and challenges of delivering courses online ...................................................... 9
2.2.1 A model for using E-learning in Education..................................................... 10
2.2.2 Pros and cons of online learning ....................................................................... 12
2.3
Modeling the framework for assessment of online learning effectiveness ............. 14
2.3.1 The needs of facilities requirement .................................................................. 14
2.3.2 Social Presence.................................................................................................... 16
2.3.3 Cognitive Presence ............................................................................................. 16
iii
2.3.4 Teaching Presence .............................................................................................. 17
2.4
The application of an Enterprise Risk Management system to manage against risk
18
2.4.1 Concept and definition ....................................................................................... 18
2.4.2 How ERM affect organization performance ................................................... 19
2.4.3 ERM in University Environment ...................................................................... 20
2.5
Lessons of successes and failures ................................................................................. 21
CHAPTER 3:
METHODOLOGIES AND DATA............................................................. 23
3.1
Research procedures ....................................................................................................... 23
3.2
Survey questionnaire ...................................................................................................... 24
3.3
Data................................................................................................................................... 31
CHAPTER 4:
4.1
ANALYSIS AND RESULTS...................................................................... 32
The business context of the International School ....................................................... 32
4.1.1 International School background ...................................................................... 32
4.1.2 Current Strategy of the IS .................................................................................. 33
4.1.3 The positioning strategy..................................................................................... 34
4.2
The impacts of pandemic to schools and universities in Vietnam and Worldwide 37
4.2.1 The pandemic aftermath..................................................................................... 37
4.2.2 COVID-19 change schools in the long run ..................................................... 38
4.2.3 Immediate damage .............................................................................................. 40
4.3
Key issues of International School in dealing with the pandemic ............................ 41
4.4
Results of Survey on the readiness of offices ............................................................. 41
4.5
Results of survey on current remote teaching methods, tools, and performance ... 43
4.6
Results of Survey on the Educational experience....................................................... 49
iv
4.7
Summary of findings and implications ........................................................................ 49
CHAPTER 5:
5.1
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ................................... 55
Recommendations for the IS to increase its readiness against future crises ........... 55
5.1.1 Opportunities arising from the Covid-19 pandemic ....................................... 55
5.1.2 General solutions to alleviate difficulties for universities and school ......... 56
5.1.3 How should International School posit itself in the market? ........................ 57
5.1.4 Protect workplace ............................................................................................... 60
5.1.5 Creating a broad Shock Plan during crisis....................................................... 63
5.1.6 Communication with students and their families ........................................... 67
5.1.7 Create remote teaching as fast as possible....................................................... 67
5.1.8 Establishing an Enterprise Risk Management system ................................... 68
5.2
Limitation and further research ..................................................................................... 69
5.3
Conclusions ..................................................................................................................... 70
LIST OF REFERENCES ....................................................................................................... 72
APPENDIX ................................................................................................................................ 80
v
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1: Pandemic Response Plan by Alert Period .............................................................. 5
Table 3-1: Questionnaires of Student’s Satisfaction .............................................................. 26
Table 3-2: Questionnaires of Educational Experience........................................................... 29
Table 4-1: The assessment of students regarding the readiness of units of Internatio nal
School during the pandemic ...................................................................................................... 42
Table 4-2: The assessment of students regarding aspects of Online teaching .................... 44
Table 4-3: The satisfaction of students regarding Teaching quality .................................... 45
Table 4-4: The satisfaction of students regarding Supporting packages ............................. 47
Table 4-5: The satisfaction of students regarding infrastructure .......................................... 48
Table 4-6: Satisfied with the responsiveness of the School to student’s complaints and
requests ........................................................................................................................................ 48
Table 4-7: Total statistics .......................................................................................................... 49
Table 5-1: Business Analysis of International School ........................................................... 58
Table 5-2: Opportunity and Threats of the International School.......................................... 59
vi
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2-1: Four stages of Pandemic ......................................................................................... 4
Figure 2-2: E-Learning Model .................................................................................................. 11
Figure 3-1: Research Procedures .............................................................................................. 24
Figure 3-2: Questionnaire to ask students about their assessment of IS’ readiness ........... 25
Figure 3-3: Conceptual Framework ......................................................................................... 25
Figure 3-4: Education Experience framework ........................................................................ 28
vii
LIST OF ABBREVIATION
VNU
Vietnam National University
IS
International School
ERM
Enterprise Risk Management
F2F
Face to Face
MS Teams
Microsoft Teams
viii
ABSTRACT
The objective of this qualitative research is to understand the effectiveness of the options
that IS has devised to prepare for the COVID-19 epidemic season. For the education
situation in Vietnam in general as well as for IS in particular, the COVID-19 pandemic has
had a tremendous impact that no one can deny. COVID-19 had the opportunity to penetrate
into Vietnamese territory and put a series of socio-economic activities of the country in a
state of stagnation. In this situation, International School has taken practical actions,
proposed concrete solutions to help students to avoid the epidemic safely, and to participate
in acquiring knowledge of the subjects appropriately.
ix
CHAP TER 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the case study
The International School of Hanoi National University (VNU-International School) is a
pioneer in undergraduate and postgraduate training in all fields and majors entirely in
English, in cooperation with nearly 40 universities in another country. Bachelors and
master's degrees are granted by Hanoi National University and foreign universities. In
2016, the International School was also the pioneer and the first in Hanoi National
University to launch a program to attract scholars, in which many professors abroad will
participate in the work, teaching and scientific research and technology transfer in the
International School (International School, 2020 c).
The Covid-19 pandemic started from China in late 2019 and transmitted around the World.
The outbreak of COVID–19 as a global pandemic started since early 2020. As of April 21,
2020, there are 2,397,216 confirmed cases and 162,956 deaths across the world (World
Health Organization, 2020). The outbreak of COVID–19 has shaken the global education
markets. Like most countries, Vietnam has to close down the society and factories in order
to prevent virus spreading. A worldwide pandemic could have a major effect on the global
economy, including travel, trade, tourism, food, consumption and eventually, investment
and financial markets. Planning for pandemic by business and industry is essential to
minimize a pandemic's impact. As with any catastrophe, having a contingency plan is
essential. Facing the complicated evolutions of the Covid-19 epidemic, many universities
in the country in general, especially universities in Hanoi, in particular have decided to
leave students absent. To ensure the interests of students and the teaching of lecturers,
universities have implemented an online learning model. Like the schools in the world as
well as the domestic schools, after a long time of delaying schedule, the Hanoi National
University as well as the International School decided that all students will participate in
the official online learning on February 24, 2020 (Wikipedia, 2020).
1
Online learning is a suitable learning method to ensure the program of the school year and
limit the spread of disease, “Pause to school but not stop learning”. Although the transition
from traditional learning still faces many shortcomings related to people's work and study
habits, maybe that is not the best way, but online learning is definitely the most appropriate
way, and also an inevitable consequence of this season.
The pandemic makes school close regular classes, change all courses to online teaching.
However, the infrastructure of the International School is yet ready for such a complete
transform to online teaching. In addition, the online teaching could get different assessment
from students, in terms of teaching quality, additional cost for students for laptop and
connection, learning quality, material supplies, etc. In such situation, I conduct the study
of the Readiness of International School in facing pandemic COVID-19 in order to assess
the level of effectiveness of approach that International School has proposed to response
to the complicated situation of pandemic.
1.2 Research objective
This thesis is to (i) assess the readiness of the International School in facing with the current
pandemic and other shocks in the future, and (ii) assess the effectiveness of delivering
classes online as a replacement for regular classes and (iii) recommend actions to improve
the performance.
The objective (i) is conducted in the section Error! Reference source not found., while
the objective (ii) is conducted in the sections Error! Reference source not found., Error!
Reference source not found., and Error! Reference source not found., and objective
(iii) is conducted in the section 5.1.
1.3 Research questions
The thesis will address the following questions:
During the pandemic, what are the issues and challenges facing to the IS?
What does the IS do in response to the pandemic?
How students assess the effectiveness of delivering courses online?
2
How IS can improve its performance following students assessments?
1.4 Structure of thesis
This thesis is constructed as follow: the literature review is to scan and assert the significant
of previous literature, in which I found strong arguments to back up for my research. Those
studies also significantly influent my stream of thinking, thus shape my idea and form a
theoretical framework that vividly portray the organization of the thesis. Chapter 3
describes the method that I choose to applied, as well as the reason behind that choices .
Data collection process, including questionnaire designation and interviewee approaching
are also discussed in this part. Analytical results then presented in chapter 4, where I discuss
the significant of the study based on the information drawing from analyzing collected
data. I spend chapter 5 to suggest some implications which I believe can help IS improve
its capability in teaching online, the limitations and direction for future research are
included in this chapter as well.
3
CHAP TER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 University reactions toward Pandemic worldwide
The impact of a pandemic on college or university operations would likely include
unprecedented demands on student health services, possible relocation of students in
residence halls and even the establishment of on-campus quarantine sites. Widespread
sickness among staff and faculty could result in 25% reductions in the work force, and
community-wide, we would see essential services hampered – perhaps unavailable. A
pandemic could create financial havoc due to significant loss of tuition revenues from
closure of the institution, and non-returning students.
California State University, Los Angeles (2019) summarized Students Affair and
Academic Affair through four main stages of Pandemic. That was Pre-pandemic, Pandemic
Alert, Pandemic and Recovery.
Figure 2-1: Four stages of Pandemic
Pre-pandemic
Pandemic
Alert
Pandemic
The results has been shown in the following Tables.
4
Recovery
Table 2-1: Pandemic Response Plan by Alert Period
Pre-pandemic
Objective
Pandemic Alert
Pandemic
Recovery.
No known casual
Human to human
Increased and
Infection/absenteeism rates
human to human
transmission occurring
sustained transmission
drop to levels which allow
transmission of the
but no cases on campus
of virus in the general
business practices to return
virus. No cases on
or in the local
population and cases in
to normal.
campus or in local
community.
the local community.
community.
Student
Coordinating
with
Keep track of absences for all daily Office staff as
Reduce
unnecessary
Reset all student services
Affairs
Public
Relations,
well as flu-like symptoms, review emergency
services while ensuring that
that have been suspended,
integrating
pandemic
contact information for all Student Affairs staff and
the
identify any staff shortages,
their respective staff.
function properly. Students
especially
will continue to access GET
Reassign staff as needed to
/ SA for online registration,
reset student contact and
grades, class schedules, etc.
service priority areas.
response information for
continuing
and
prospective students and
their
families,
must
identify successors in
key student areas.
Inform students of potential international and
domestic student exchange about student travel
restrictions.
school's
websites
areas.
Prospective students can
register
through
CSUMentor and view their
application status, including
resources.
is
Students will
graduation
5
critical
missing.
apply for
online,
Review and evaluate the
effectiveness
of
change
procedures and advice.
Pre-pandemic
Pandemic Alert
Pandemic
Recovery.
department approval will be
accepted by email.
The school is closed but still
needs to be addressed in
time for the specific needs
of
students
regarding
accessibility through the
course's websites, and the
availability
of computers
and technical support.
Academic
Disseminate
Receive updates fro m
Monitor
Affairs
information
and
Reset all student services
the
student absences and
that have been suspended,
the
report to the University
identify any staff shortages,
possibility of activating
Pandemic Director and
especially
understanding,
the Pandemic Response
the
University
Reassign staff as needed to
preparation and actions.
Plan,
Pandemic
BCP
reset student contact and
Review
appropriate informatio n
Committee.
dissemination
for
guidance contingencies
student absences during
lecturers
the
and maintain consistent
absences, care for family
status and responses of
Academic
to
institutions
about
their
policies
standards
and
regarding
Pandemic
Commission
on
facilitat e
about
members or if the school the university.
is
closed,
teacher
regarding
absences,
Ensure
students
contact
faculty
Make
with
instructor
are
aware of personal and
instructional
the
on
action
plans and procedures.
group hygiene in the
6
critical
areas.
service priority areas.
Review and evaluate the
effectiveness
of
change
procedures and advice
Pre-pandemic
Pandemic Alert
Pandemic
suggest changes to HR,
classroom and prepare
Review
if appropriate.
alternatives
withdrawing
Develop
a
plan
for
students to create missed
classes
or
for
and consider
students
classroom instruction if
during other internship
possible.
or clinical rotation and
facilitate
approve
the
dissemination
classes, if necessary.
Recovery.
of
instructors.
Disseminate
influenza
pandemic business plans
to all its faculty and
staff. Develop a plan for
caring and supervising
students
in
Ensure
students
aware
and
are
practice
personal
and
group
hygiene
in
the
classroom.
practice,
internships and learning
that
serves
the
community
All Universi ty
Plan for organizational
Report the absence of an
All
Organizational
resilience and personnel action
for
employee due to illness
continue
Unit
succession
individual areas with a
greater than one day to
members
organization and prepare
focus
the Pandemic Manager,
organization for flu-related
and periodically update
personnel.
make job cuts to those
symptoms
essential
/
absences,
activities to continue the
university
University's operations
normal functioning as the
personal
in
the
contact
information
emergency call lists.
and
Prepare and / or update
plans
on
Evaluate
minimal
external
contracts and service
providers as a backup
measure
to
maintain
7
functions
departments
to
will
monito r
of
and
their
/
or
restoring
operations
to
Pre-pandemic
Evaluate
how
organization
continue
normally
to
Pandemic Alert
the
operability
will
necessary,
function
with
the
potential for large staff
absences.
service
perform.
and,
if
establish
contracts
to
Pandemic
and teaching cases for
situation
students.
allowed.
In case of partial or full
Conduct an assessment of
campus closure, follo w
pandemic procedures and
the department's plan to
protocols, and report to the
shut down and operate
BCP Pandemic Commit t ee
according
to
any
essential
functional
protocol,
as
the
defined
earlier.
will
Recovery.
allow.
opportunity
improvement
and
for
/
or
interest.
Follow
guidance
from
and
In case of university
direction
the
closure, implement the
University Epidemic BCP
university / faculty plan
Committee about potential
to shut down.
changes in alert status and /
or organizational readiness.
8
2.2 Issues and challenges of delivering courses online
Allen, Seaman, and Garret (2007) classified online learning as a frame of e-learning that is
empowered by web-based technologies, does not require the teacher and the learner to be
accessible at the same time and place, and constitutes 80% or more learning/teaching
activities conducted through web-based ICT. E-learning can be broadly described as any
learning and/or educating conveyed or conducted through Information Communication
Technology (ICT) of any kind, hence encompassing such different digital technologies
including CD-ROM, television, interactive multimedia, mobile phones, and the Internet
(Andrew & Haythornthwaite, 2007; Brenton, 2009; Guri-Rosenelt, 2009; Mellar, 2008).
Online and blended learning have become common place in 21st century higher education.
Larreamendy-Joerns
and Leinhardt (2006) audit of the writing “observed two
complementary developments within the educational landscape: the merging of online
teaching and learning into the stream of everyday practices at universities, and the
progressively salient role of distance programs in institutions of higher education ”
Talent-Runnels et al (2006) evaluated course environment, learners’ results, and learners’
characteristics, institutional and administrative components. In critiquing the available
literature, they identified that “asynchronous communication appeared to facilitate indepth communication (but not more than in traditional classes), students preferred to move
at their own pace, learning results showed up to be the same as in traditional courses, and
students with prior training in computers were more satisfied with online courses” (p.93).
The Internet has become one of the crucial ways to form accessible resources for research
and learning for both teachers and students to share and acquire information (Richard ;
Haya, 2009). Technology-based e-learning includes the use of the internet and other
important technologies to produce materials for learning, educate learners, and also
regulate courses in an organization (Fry, 2001). There has been extensive debate about a
common definition of the term e-learning. Existing definitions according to Dublin (2003)
tend to reveal the specialization and interest of the analysts. E-learning as a concept covers
9
a range of applications, learning methods and processes (Rossi, 2009). It is hence
troublesome to discover a commonly accepted definition for the term e - learning, and
according to Oblinger and Hawkins (2005) and Dublin (2003), there is indeed no common
definition for the term. Holmes and Gardner (2006) also made a comment on these
inconsistencies by saying that there may be as many definitions of the term e-learning as
there are.
According to the most likelihood definitions of online learnings, I defined it as online
learning can be defined as an approach to teaching and learning that utilizes Internet
technologies to communicate and collaborate in an educational context. This approach
allows students and teachers to work together remotely, without being in bricks-and-mortal
classrooms.
2.2.1
A model for using E-learning in Education
Blended learning may be a combination of learning at a distance and the traditional oncampus learning (in a classroom). Fundamentally, you will have a (more or less) settled
plan where you will have to attend a portion of the classes on campus. Meaveyements done
by the Pew Research Center (2011) appear that in the 2010-11 academic year, 89 percent
of four-year colleges and universities offered courses instructed completely online, or
hybrid/blended online, or other forms of distance/non-face-to-face instruction (Parker, K.,
Lenhart, A., & Moore, K. , 2011). Of all students selected in higher education in 2013, 32
percent took at least one online course (Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J., 2013). In the research
literature, online education is variously termed as “distance education” “e-learning,”
“online learning,” “blended learning,” “computer-based learning,” “web-based learning,”
“virtual
learning,”
“tele-education,”
“cyber
learning,”
“Internet-based
learning,”
“distributed learning,” etc.
Meanwhile, in online learning, the key component is the utilizing of internet. Online
learning can be characterized as “learning that takes place partially or entirely over the
Internet” (U.S. Department of Education, 2010). Online learning refers to the idea of using
online devices for learning. Fundamentally, an online course infers a distance between you
10
and your instructors. Lectures, assignments, tests are all empowered by virtual platforms.
Exams are applied online as well, using web exam program. Content can be accessed
anytime, anyplace. Time & space don’t matter too much here. Students don’t need to be
within the same physical place to take the same instruction. A completely online college
degree implies you will not need to travel at all for your studies.
There are assorted ways of classifying the sorts of e-learning. According to Algahtani
(2011), there have been a few classifications based on the degree of their engagement in
education. Some classifications are also based on the timing of interaction. Algahtani
(2011) separated e-learning into two fundamental sorts, comprising of computer-based and
the internet-based e-learning. According to Algahtani (2011), the computer-based learning
comprises the utilizing of a full range of hardware and software by and large that are
accessible for the utilizing of Information and Communication Technology and also each
component can be utilized in either of two ways: computer-managed instruction and
computer-assisted-learning. In computer assisted- learning, to him, computers are used
rather than the traditional methods by giving interactive software as a support instrument
within the class or as a tool for self-learning outside the class. In the computer-managedinstruction, however, computers are employed for the reason of storing and recovering
information to aid in the administration of education.
E-Learning
Model
Adjust
Online
Blended
Individualized
Learning
Collaborative
Learning
Synchronous
Asynchronous
Figure 2-2: E-Learning Model
11
2.2.2
Pros and cons of online learning
The selection of E-learning in instruction, particularly for higher instructive educations has
several benefits, and given its several preferences and benefits, e-learning is considered
among the leading approaches of instruction. Several studies and authors have given
benefits and advantages derived from the selection of e-learning technologies into schools
(Klein, D. & Ware, M. , 2003; Algahtani, 2011; Hameed, S. Badii, A. & Cullen, A. J. ,
2008; Marc, 2002; Wentling T.L, Waight C, Gallagher J, La Fleur J, Wang C, Kanfer A. ,
2000; Nichols, 2003). Some studies provide advantage of e-learning as its capacity to focus
on the requirements of individual learners. For example Marc (2002) in his book audit on
e-learning strategies for conveying information in digital age noted that one of the
advantages of e-learning in instruction is its focus on the needs of individual learners as a
critical figure in the process of instruction instead of on the instructors’, or educational
institutions’ needs.
E-learning, despite the advantages that it has when accepted in education, also has some
drawbacks. Researches encourage that e-learning keeps some disadvantages (Collins,
1997; Klein, D. & Ware, M. , 2003; Hameed, S. Badii, A. & Cullen, A. J., 2008; Almosa,
2002; Akkoyuklu, B. & Soylu, M. Y. , 2006; Lewis, 2000; Scott B., Ken C. H. & Edwin
M. G., 1999; Marc, 2002; Dowling, C., Godfrey, J. M. & Gyles N. , 2003; Mayes, 2002).
For example in spite of the claims that e-Learning can advance the education quality,
Dowling et al. (2003) dispute that making learning materials obtainable online outcomes
in improved learning results only for definite models of collective appraisal. Also Mayes
(2002) asked a request of whether e Learning is simply a support device for existing
approaches of learning. The most noticeable conviction of e-Learning is the total absence
of critical personal interactions, not only between learners and instructors, but also among
colleague learners
(Young, 1997; Burdman, 1998). According to Almosa (2002),
regardless of all the drawbacks of e-learning, there are a lot of advantages which stimulate
its use and also encourage the search for ways to reduce problems.
The advantages of e-learning given by studies are summarized as the following:
12
It is adaptable when issues of time and place are taken into consideration. According to
Smedley (2010), e-learning gives the institutions and their students or learners the much
flexibility of time and place of conveyance or receipt of according to learning
knowledge.
E-learning enhances the adequacy of information and capabilities through ease of
access to a huge amount of information.
It is able to supply opportunities for relations between learners by the utilizing of
discussion forums. Wagner et al (2008) note that e-Learning makes accessible extra
prospects for interactivity between students and teachers during substance delivery.
E-learning is cost effective in the sense that there is no need for the students or learners
to travel. It is additionally cost effective in the sense that it offers opportunities f or
learning for the most extreme number of learners with no require for numerous
buildings.
E-learning continuously takes into consideration the individual learners contrasts. Some
learners, for occurrence incline toward to concentrate on certain parts of the course,
whereas others are prepared to review the total course.
E-learning helps compensate for shortages of academic staff, consists of instructors or
teachers as well as facilitators, lab technicians etc.
The disadvantages of e-learning given by studies (Collins, 1997; Klein, D. & Ware, M. ,
2003; Hameed, S. Badii, A. & Cullen, A. J. , 2008; Almosa, 2002; Akkoyuklu, B. & Soylu,
M. Y. , 2006; Lewis, 2000; Scott B., Ken C. H. & Edwin M. G., 1999; Marc, 2002) are
summarized as following:
E-learning makes the learners undergo consideration, remoteness, as well as lack of
interaction or collaboration. It therefore expects a very strong motivation as well as
skills with to the management of time in order to decrease such effects.
With respect to interpretations, offer of explanations, as well as interpretations, the e learning way might be less useful than the traditional method of learning. The learning
13
process is much easier with the application of the face to face encounter with the
instructors or teachers.
When it comes to development in communication skills of learners, e-learning as a
method might have a negative impact. Though might have an outstanding acquaintance
in academics, they may not own the needed skills to provide their acquired knowledge
to others.
Since tests for appraisals in e-learning are possibly done with the utilization of proxy,
it will be challenging, if not impossible to manage or regulate bad activities like
cheating.
Also not all fields or discipline can use the e-learning technique in education. For
instance, the purely scientific fields that contain practical cannot be properly studies
through e-learning. Researches have disputed that e-learning is more appropriate in
social science and humanities than the fields such as medical science and pharmacy,
where there is the need to improve practical skills.
E-learning may also probably be misled to piracy and plagiarism, predisposed by
insufficient selection skills, as well as the ease of copy and paste.
E-learning may also conduct to congestion or heavy use of some websites. This may
bring about unexpected costs both in time and money disadvantages;
2.3 Modeling the framework for assessment of online learning effectiveness
2.3.1
The needs of facilities requirement
School facilities are one of the key educational requirements that must be sustained in term
of security and quality. Parents sometimes are taking into consideration the school facilities
as the important principle in the school selection. A good condition of school buildings and
components reinforce the improvement in teaching and learning progress in the school
(Earthman, 2002; McKoy, D., Vincent, J. M., & Makarewicz, C, 2008).
The United States Department of Education analyzed teachers’ utilizing of technology in
education in the public-school frameworks (Gray, L., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L, 2010). Of
14