Si-face stereospecificity at C5 of coenzyme F
420
for F
420
H
2
oxidase from methanogenic Archaea as determined by
mass spectrometry
Henning Seedorf
1
,Jo
¨
rg Kahnt
1
, Antonio J. Pierik
2
and Rudolf K. Thauer
1
1 Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany
2 Fachbereich Biologie, Philipps-Universita
¨
t, Marburg, Germany
Methanogenic Archaea fluoresce greenish yellow when
irradiated with UVA light. The fluorescence is due to
coenzyme F
420
, a 7,8-didemethyl-8-hydroxy-5-deaza-
riboflavin derivative (Fig. 1). The coenzyme, which is
generally present in 1 mm intracellular concentrations
[1], functions as a redox mediator in methanogenesis,
in NADP
+
reduction and in glucose-6-phosphate
dehydrogenation [2]. With respect to its redox proper-
ties, F
420
is much more similar to pyridine nucleotides
than to flavins [3]. Both F
420
and NAD(P) transfer
hydride anions and not single electrons. In the reduced
form, both F
420
and NAD(P) have a prochiral centre,
F
420
at C5 and NAD(P) at C4. They differ function-
ally, mainly in that the redox potential of the
F
420
⁄ F
420
H
2
pair (E°¢ ¼ )360 mV) is 40 mV more
negative than that of the NAD(P)
+
⁄ NAD(P)H pair
(E°¢ ¼ )320 mV) [5].
All F
420
-dependent enzymes analysed to date in this
respect have been shown to be Si-face stereospecific at
C5 of F
420
[6]. This is surprising because NAD(P)-
dependent enzymes can be Si-face or Re-face specific
[7] and some flavoenzymes, whose apoproteins catalyse
the reduction of synthetic 8-hydroxy-5-deaza-FAD,
have been shown to be Si-face stereospecific with
respect to C5 of the synthetic deazaflavin and others
to be Re-face stereospecific [7,8]. In case of the
pyridine-nucleotide-dependent enzymes the redox
potential (E°) of the electron acceptor reduced by
NAD(P)H is thought to be an important factor deter-
mining the stereospecificity of these enzymes [9,10].
Keywords
coenzyme F
420
; 5-deazaflavins;
F
420
H
2
oxidase; methanogenic Archaea;
stereospecificity
Correspondence
R. K. Thauer, Max Planck-Institute for
Terrestrial Microbiology, Karl-von-Frisch-
Strasse, D-35043 Marburg, Germany
Fax: +49 642 117 8109
Tel: +49 642 117 8101
E-mail:
(Received 4 July 2005, revised 17 August
2005, accepted 23 August 2005)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04931.x
Coenzyme F
420
is a 5-deazaflavin. Upon reduction, 1,5 dihydro-coenzyme
F
420
is formed with a prochiral centre at C5. All the coenzyme
F
420
-dependent enzymes investigated to date have been shown to be Si-face
stereospecific with respect to C5 of the deazaflavin, despite most F
420
-
dependent enzymes being unrelated phylogenetically. In this study, we
report that the recently discovered F
420
H
2
oxidase from methanogenic
Archaea is also Si-face stereospecific. The enzyme was found to catalyse
the oxidation of (5S)-[5-
2
H
1
]F
420
H
2
with O
2
to [5-
1
H]F
420
rather than to
[5-
2
H]F
420
as determined by MALDI-TOF MS. (5S)-[5-
2
H
1
]F
420
H
2
was
generated by stereospecific enzymatic reduction of F
420
with (14a-
2
H
2
)-
[14a-
2
H
2
] methylenetetrahydromethanopterin.
Abbreviations
Adf, F
420
-specific alcohol dehydrogenase; F
420
, coenzyme F
420
; Fgd, F
420
-dependent glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; Fno, F
420
H
2
:
NADP
+
oxidoreductase; Fpo, F
420
H
2
dehydrogenase complex; FprA, F
420
H
2
oxidase; Frd, F
420
-dependent formate dehydrogenase; Frh,
F
420
-reducing hydrogenase; H
4
MPT, tetrahydromethanopterin; Mer, F
420
-dependent methylenetetrahydromethanopterin reductase;
methylene-H
4
MPT, methylenetetrahydromethanopterin; Mtd, F
420
-dependent methylenetetrahydromethanopterin dehydrogenase; TFA,
trifluoroacetic acid.
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 5337–5342 ª 2005 FEBS 5337
Redox potentials (E°) of the electron acceptor more neg-
ative than )200 mV generally promote Si-face stereo-
specificity and redox potentials more positive than
)200 mV promote Re-face stereospecificity at C4
of NAD(P). Thus the NADP-dependent glucose-6-phos-
phate dehydrogenase is Si-face specific (E° ¼
)330 mV) and the NAD-dependent malate dehydro-
genase is Re-face specific (E° ¼ )170 mV). Most eth-
anol dehydrogenases are Re-face specific (E° ¼
200 mV), but the enzyme from Drosophila melanogaster
is Si-face specific. For recent literature on the subject see
Berk et al. [11].
The following eight F
420
-dependent enzymes have
been analysed and shown to be Si-face specific: F
420
-
reducing hydrogenase (Frh) [12,13]; F
420
-dependent
formate dehydrogenase (Frd) [14]; F
420
-specific alcohol
dehydrogenase (Adf) [6]; F
420
-dependent methylene-
tetrahydromethanopterin dehydrogenase (Mtd) [15,16];
F
420
-dependent methylenetetrahydromethanopterin
reductase (Mer) [15]; F
420
H
2
dehydrogenase complex
(Fpo) [15]; F
420
H
2
: NADP
+
oxidoreductase (Fno)
[17,18]; and F
420
-dependent glucose-6-phosphate de-
hydrogenase (Fgd) [6]. Adf, Mer and Fgd form a fam-
ily, as do the F
420
-binding subunits FpoF, FrhB and
FrdB. The two families, Mtd and Fno are not phylo-
genetically related. The eight enzymes catalyse redox
reactions with electron acceptors ranging in redox
potential (E°
¢
) from )414 mV (2H
+
⁄ H
2
)to)165 mV
(methanophenazine ox ⁄ red) [19]. The Si-face stereospe-
cificity of F
420
-dependent enzymes thus appears to be
independent of their phylogenetic origin and of the
thermodynamics of the reactions catalysed by them.
Recently a novel F
420
-dependent enzyme, F
420
H
2
oxidase (FprA), was discovered in methanogenic Arch-
aea [20]. FprA catalyses the oxidation of 2 F
420
H
2
with
O
2
to 2 F
420
and 2 H
2
O. The 45 kDa protein contains
1 FMN per mol and harbours a binuclear iron centre
indicated by the sequence motif H-X-E-X-D-X
63
-H-
X
18
-D-X
62
-H. FprA is not phylogenetically related
to any of the other F
420
-dependent enzymes and cata-
lyses a reaction with a redox potential difference
of +1.27 V (F
420
H
2
oxidation with O
2
). We therefore
investigated the stereospecificity of this enzyme and
found it to be Si-face specific at C5 of F
420
. The
method used was based, in principle, on the technique
for determining the hydride transfer stereospecificity of
nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-linked oxidoreduc-
tases by MS [21].
Results
The following findings are important for the under-
standing of the results shown in Fig. 2: (a) [5-
1
H]F
420
and [5-
2
H]F
420
can be identified and the relative
amounts present in a mixture quantitated using
MALDI-TOF-MS; (b) F
420
H
2
auto-oxidizes nonstereo-
specifically to F
420
in the matrix used for MALDI-
TOF-MS; (c) F
420
is stereospecifically reduced to
F
420
H
2
with methylenetetrahydromethanopterin
(methylene-H
4
MPT) in the presence of F
420
-dependent
methylene-H
4
MPT dehydrogenase (Mtd), which has
been shown to be Si-face specific at C5 of F
420
[15,16];
and (d) F
420
is chemically reduced to F
420
H
2
with
NaBH
4
in a nonstereospecific reaction.
In Fig. 2A three MALDI-TOF mass spectra of a
control experiment are shown: the spectrum of
[5-
1
H]F
420
(Fig. 2Aa); the spectrum of [5-
1
H
2
]F
420
H
2
generated from [5-
1
H]F
420
by Mtd-catalysed reduction
with [14a-
1
H
2
]methylene-H
4
MPT (Fig. 2Ab); and the
spectrum of [5-
1
H]F
420
generated from [5-
1
H
2
]F
420
H
2
by FprA catalysed oxidation (Fig. 2Ac). As seen from
the normalized 1 Da separated stick spectra (insets,
black) all three mass spectra are almost identical to the
stick spectrum (insets, white) calculated for [5-
1
H]F
420
from its elemental composition considering the isotope
composition of the elements: 98.9%
12
C, 1.1%
13
C;
99.63%
14
N, 0.37%
15
N; 99.99%
1
H, 0.01%
2
H; and
99.76%
16
O, 0.24%
17
O and
18
O.
The experiment shown in Fig. 2B differs from that
in Fig. 2A only in that in the first step F
420
was enzy-
matically reduced with [14a-
2
H
2
] methylene-H
4
MPT
yielding (5S)-[5-
2
H
1
]F
420
H
2
. FprA catalysed oxidation
of (5S)-[5-
2
H
1
]F
420
H
2
yielded only[5–
1
H]F
420
as indica-
ted by the mass spectrum (Fig. 2Bc), which was identi-
cal to that calculated for [5-
1
H]F
420
(Fig. 2Ba). This
result can only be explained if FprA is Si-face specific
with respect to C5 of F
420
. In contrast, auto-oxidation
of (5S)-[5-
2
H
1
]F
420
H
2
yielded a 1 : 2 mixture of
[5-
1
H]F
420
and [5-
2
H]F
420
, as indicated by the relative
intensities of the 772 and 773 Da mass peaks
Fig. 1. Structure of reduced coenzyme F
420
(F
420
H
2
). F
420
¼ N-(N-
L-lactyl-L-glutamyl)-L-glutamic acid phosphodiester of 7,8-didemethyl-
8-hydroxy-5-deazariboflavin.
Stereochemistry of F
420
H
2
oxidase H. Seedorf et al.
5338 FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 5337–5342 ª 2005 FEBS
(Fig. 2Bb, stick spectrum, black). For comparison the
relative intensities calculated for a 1 : 1 mixture are
given (Fig. 2Bb, stick spectrum, white). The [5-
1
H]F
420
to [5-
2
H]F
420
ratio of 1 : 2 can be explained assuming
a deuterium isotope effect of 2 for the auto-oxida-
tion reaction.
As a control, F
420
was reduced with NaB
2
H
4
(NaBD
4
) yielding a mixture of (5S)-[5-
2
H
1
]F
420
H
2
and
(5R)-[5-
2
H
1
]F
420
H
2
. The FprA-catalysed oxidation of
the mixture yielded a 1 : 1 mixture of [5-
1
H]F
420
and
[5-
2
H]F
420
as revealed by the relative intensities of the
772 and 773 Da mass peaks (Fig. 2Cc). The results are
consistent with FprA catalyzing the oxidation of (5S)-
[5-
2
H
1
]F
420
H
2
to [5-
1
H]F
420
and the oxidation of (5R)-
[5-
2
H
1
]F
420
H
2
to [5-
2
H]F
420
as to be expected for a
Si-face-specific enzyme. The finding that the 775 Da
mass peak in Fig. 2Cb was much lower than in
Fig. 2Bb is probably due to the fact that reduction
of F
420
with NaBD
4
(Fig. 2C) was not complete
and therefore after auto-oxidation the F
420
analysed
contained less
2
H.
Discussion
In the Introduction it was pointed out that all F
420
-
dependent enzymes investigated have been shown to be
Si-face specific at C5 of F
420
, despite four of these
enzymes being unrelated phylogenetically. The finding
that F
420
H
2
oxidase (FprA) is also Si-face specific brings
to five the number of Si-face-specific F
420
-dependent
enzymes that are not related phylogenetically. There is
only a 6.25% probability that this is by chance.
To date, the crystal structures of four F
420
-dependent
enzymes have been resolved: F
420
H
2
:NADP oxido-
reductase, with and without F
420
bound [22];
F
420
-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase with F
420
bound
[23]; Mer, with and without F
420
bound [24,25]; and
Mtd without F
420
bound [26]. A common F
420
-binding
Fig. 2. MALDI-TOF-MS analysis of F
420
and F
420
H
2
for the deter-
mination of the stereospecificity of F
420
H
2
oxidase (FprA). The
insets show normalized 1 Da separated stick spectra obtained from
the measured data (black) aligned to simulated spectra (white). For
better visibility in the structures deuterium is abbreviated by D
rather than by
2
H and hydrogen by H rather than
1
H. Mtd, Si-face-
specific F
420
-dependent methylenetetrahydromethanopterin de-
hydrogenase. (A) Experiment with nonlabelled substrates showing
that the mass spectrum of [5-
1
H
2
]F
420
H
2
(b), owing to auto-oxida-
tion of F
420
H
2
, is identical to that of [5-
1
H]F
420
(a, c). The simulated
stick spectra (white) are for [5-
1
H]F
420
. (B) Experiment with specif-
ically
2
H-labelled substrates showing that the mass spectrum of
F
420
formed from (5S)-[5-
2
H
1
]F
420
H
2
by FprA-catalysed oxidation (c)
is identical to the spectrum of [5-
1
H]F
420
(a). The simulated stick
spectrum (b, white) of (5S)-[5-
2
H
1
]F
420
H
2
is for a 1 : 1 mixture of
[5-
1
H]F
420
and [5-
2
H]F
420
. The other two (a, c) are for [5-
1
H]F
420
.(C)
Experiment with NaB
2
H
4
-reduced [5-
1
H]F
420
showing that the mass
spectrum of F
420
formed from reduced F
420
by FprA-catalysed oxi-
dation corresponds to that of a mixture of [5-
1
H]F
420
and [5-
2
H]F
420
(c). The simulated stick spectrum of reduced F
420
(b, white) and
that of the FprA oxidation product (c, white) are for a 1 : 1 mixture
of [5-
1
H]F
420
and [5-
2
H]F
420
.
H. Seedorf et al. Stereochemistry of F
420
H
2
oxidase
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 5337–5342 ª 2005 FEBS 5339
motif explaining the Si-face specificity of these enzymes
was not found. It therefore has to be considered that
Si-face specificity may be an intrinsic property of F
420
rather than of the F
420
-dependent enzymes. An example
of the stereospecificity of a dehydrogenase being dicta-
ted by the structure of its substrate has recently been
published. There are several phylogenetically unrelated
methylenetetrahydromethanopterin dehydrogenases
and methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenases that are
all Re-face specific at the carbon of the methylene group
[27,28]. It has been calculated that the transition state
conformation of methylenetetrahydromethanopterin
and methylenetetrahydrofolate for the dehydrogenation
from the Re-face is energetically favoured [28]. How-
ever, in the case of F
420
, there are no centres of asym-
metry in the near neighbourhood of C5 that could
interact with the reactant or the product, or affect the
transition state(s) and by that induce an intrinsic ener-
getic difference in the reaction profiles involving the Si
versus the Re side of F
420
. The nearest asymmetry cen-
tres are in the N10 side chain. It is therefore difficult
to envisage how the Si-face stereospecificity of F
420
-
dependent enzymes could be dictated by the structure
of F
420
.
Experimental procedures
Isotopes, coenzymes and enzymes
Deuterium oxide (
2
H
2
O) and deuterated formaldehyde
(
2
H
2
CO) were from Euriso-Top (Saarbru
¨
cken, Germany)
and sodium borodeuteride (NaB
2
H
4
) was from Fluka (Tauf-
kirchen, Germany). Coenzyme F
420
and tetrahydrometha-
nopterin (H
4
MPT) were purified from Methanothermobacter
marburgensis (DSMZ 2133) [29] [14a-
1
H
2
]methylene-H
4
MPT
was prepared by spontaneous reaction of H
4
MPT and
1
H
2
CO and [14a-
2
H
2
]methylene-H
4
MPT by spontaneous
reaction of H
4
MPT and
2
H
2
CO [30]. FprA from M. marbur-
gensis [20] and Mtd from Methanopyrus kandleri [26] were
produced heterologously in Escherichia coli and purified to
specific activities of 100 and 4000 UÆmg
)1
, respectively
(1 U ¼ 1 lmolÆmin
)1
). Protein was determined with the Rot-
Nanoquant-Microassay from Roth (Karlsruhe, Germany)
using bovine serum albumin as standard.
Assay to determine the stereospecificity of F
420
H
2
oxidase
The assay is described in Fig. 2B. The 1.2 mL assay mix-
ture at 30 °C contained 60 lm H
4
MPT, 140 lm
2
H
2
CO and
55 lm F
420
in oxic 120 mm potassium phosphate pH 6.
Reduction of F
420
to (5S)-[
2
H
1
]F
420
H
2
with [14a-
2
H
2
]methy-
lene-H
4
MPT (spontaneously generated from H
4
MPT and
2
H
2
CO) was started by the addition of 120 U Mtd (Si-face
specific) and was completed after 5 min. Subsequently,
60 U FprA were added, which catalysed the oxidation of
F
420
H
2
with O
2
as the electron acceptor. Samples of the
assay were taken before and 5 min after the addition of
Mtd and 5 min after the addition of FprA and analysed by
MALDI-TOF-MS.
In the control experiment described in Fig. 2A, the
1.2 mL assay mixture contained 140 lm
1
H
2
CO instead of
140 lm
2
H
2
CO.
In the control experiment described in Fig. 2C, the
1.2 mL assay did not contain H
4
MPT, H
2
CO or Mtd.
Instead, F
420
was reduced with NaB
2
H
4
to a mixture of
(5S)-[5-
2
H
1
]F
420
H
2
and (5R)-[5-
2
H
1
]F
420
H
2
. This step was
carried out under anaerobic conditions.
Analysis of F
420
and F
420
H
2
by MALDI-TOF-MS
Samples (25 lL) of the 1.2 mL assay mixtures were applied
to a small ZipTips (Millipore Corp, Bedford, MA, USA)
column previously equilibrated with 0.1% (v ⁄ v) trifluoro-
acetic acid (TFA). The column was then washed with 0.1%
(v ⁄ v) TFA to remove salts and was then eluted with 84%
(v ⁄ v) acetonitrile ⁄ 0.1% (v ⁄ v) TFA. The eluate was dried by
vacuum centrifugation and the dried pellet dissolved in
10 lL 0.1% (v ⁄ v) TFA and subsequently supplemented
with 10 lL of a saturated solution of a -cyano-4-hydroxy-
cinnamic acid in 70% (v ⁄ v) acetonitrile ⁄ 0.1% (v ⁄ v) TFA.
Aliquots were air dried and analysed by MALDI-TOF-MS.
The mass spectra were collected in the reflector negative-
ion mode. For each spectrum, at least 150 single shots were
summed. The spectra were determined with a Voyager DE
RP from PE Biosystems.
The natural isotopic distribution in F
420
was calculated
by the isotope pattern calculator provided by the University
of Sheffield at the ChemPuter site ( />chemistry/chemputer/). All calculations of simulated data
were carried out in excel 2000 and transformed into stick
spectra separated by 1 Da [31].
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Max Planck Society
and by the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie. Henning
Seedorf thanks the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
for a graduate fellowship. We are indebted to Christ-
oph Hagemeier for providing purified F
420
-dependent
Mtd from Methanopyrus kandleri.
References
1 Scho
¨
nheit P, Keweloh H & Thauer RK (1981) Factor
F
420
degradation in Methanobacterium thermoauto-
Stereochemistry of F
420
H
2
oxidase H. Seedorf et al.
5340 FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 5337–5342 ª 2005 FEBS
trophicum during exposure to oxygen. FEMS Microbiol
Lett 12, 347–349.
2 Thauer RK (1998) Biochemistry of methanogenesis: a
tribute to Marjory Stephenson. Microbiology 144, 2377–
2406.
3 Jacobson F & Walsh C (1984) Properties of 7,8-di-
demethyl-8-hydroxy-5-deazaflavins relevant to redox
coenzyme function in methanogen metabolism.
Biochemistry 23, 979–988.
4 Walsh C (1986) Naturally occurring 5-deazaflavin
coenzymes: biological redox roles. Acc Chem Res 19,
216–221.
5 Gloss LM & Hausinger RP (1987) Reduction potential
characterization of methanogen factor 390. FEMS
Microbiol Lett 48, 143–145.
6 Klein AR, Berk H, Purwantini E, Daniels L & Thauer
RK (1996) Si-face stereospecificity at C5 of coenzyme
F
420
for F
420
-dependent glucose-6-phosphate dehydro-
genase from Mycobacterium smegmatis and F
420
-depen-
dent alcohol dehydrogenase from Methanoculleus
thermophilicus. Eur J Biochem 239, 93–97.
7 Creighton DJ & Murthy NSRK (1990) Stereochemistry
of enzyme-catalyzed reactions at carbon. In The
Enzymes (Sigman DS & Boyer PD, eds), Vol. XIX,
pp. 323–421. Academic Press, San Diego.
8 Sumner JS & Matthews RG (1992) Stereochemistry and
mechanism of hydrogen transfer between NADPH and
methylenetetrahydrofolate in the reaction catalyzed by
methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase from pig liver.
J Am Chem Soc 114, 6949–6956.
9 Benner SA (1982) The stereoselectivity of alcohol
dehydrogenases: a stereochemical imperative?
Experientia 38, 633–637.
10 Nambiar KP, Stauffer DM, Kolodziej PA & Benner SA
(1983) A mechanistic basis for the stereoselectivity of
enzymatic transfer of hydrogen from nicotinamide
cofactors. J Am Chem Soc 105, 5886–5890.
11 Berk H, Buckel W, Thauer RK & Frey PA (1996)
Re-face stereospecificity at C4 of NAD(P) for alcohol
dehydrogenase from Methanogenium organophilum and
for (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate dehydrogenase from
Acidaminococcus fermentans as determined by
1
H-NMR
spectroscopy. FEBS Lett 399, 92–94.
12 Teshima T, Nakai S, Shiba T, Tsai L & Yamazaki J
(1985) Elucidation of stereospecificity of a selenium-
containig hydrogenase from Methanococcus vannielii –
syntheses of (R)- and S-[4-H1]-3,4-dihydro-7-hydroxy-
1-hydroxyethylquinolinone. Tetrahedron Lett 26,
351–354.
13 Yamazaki S, Tsai L, Stadtman TC, Teshima T, Nakaji
A & Shiba T (1985) Stereochemical studies of a
selenium-containing hydrogenase from Methanococcus
vannielii: determination of the absolute configuration of
C-5 chirally labeled dihydro-8-hydroxy-5-deazaflavin
cofactor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82, 1364–1366.
14 Schauer NL, Ferry JG, Honek JF, Orme-Johnson WH
& Walsh C (1986) Mechanistic studies of the coenzyme
F
420
reducing formate dehydrogenase from Methano-
bacterium formicicum. Biochemistry 25, 7163–7168.
15 Kunow J, Schwo
¨
rer B, Setzke E & Thauer RK (1993) Si-
face stereospecificity at C5 of coenzyme F
420
for F
420
-
dependent N5,N10-methylenetetrahydromethanopterin
dehydrogenase, F
420
-dependent N5,N10–methylene-
tetrahydromethanopterin reductase and F
420
H
2
: dimeth-
ylnaphthoquinone oxidoreductase. Eur J Biochem 214,
641–646.
16 Klein AR & Thauer RK (1995) Re-face specificity at
C14a of methylenetetrahydromethanopterin and Si-face
specificity at C5 of coenzyme F
420
for coenzyme F
420
-
dependent methylenetetrahydromethanopterin dehydro-
genase from methanogenic Archaea. Eur J Biochem
227, 169–174.
17 Yamazaki S, Tsai L, Stadtman TC, Jacobson FS &
Walsh C (1980) Stereochemical studies of 8-hydroxy-
5-deazaflavin-dependent NADP
+
reductase from
Methanococcus vannielii. J Biol Chem 255, 9025–
9027.
18 Kunow J, Schwo
¨
rer B, Stetter KO & Thauer RK (1993)
AF
420
-dependent NADP reductase in the extremely
thermophilic sulfate-reducing Archaeoglobus fulgidus.
Arch Microbiol 160, 199–205.
19 Tietze M, Beuchle A, Lamla I, Orth N, Dehler M,
Greiner G & Beifuss U (2003) Redox potentials of
methanophenazine and CoB-S-S-CoM, factors involved
in electron transport in methanogenic Archaea. Chem-
biochem 4, 333–335.
20 Seedorf H, Dreisbach A, Hedderich R, Shima S & Thauer
RK (2004) F
420
H
2
oxidase (FprA) from Methanobrevi-
bacter arboriphilus, a coenzyme F
420
-dependent enzyme
involved in O
2
detoxification. Arch Microbiol 182, 126–
137.
21 Ehmke A, Flossdorf J, Habicht W, Schiebel HM &
Schulten HR (1980) A new technique for determining
the hydride transfer stereospecificity of nicotinamide
adenine dinucleotide-linked oxidoreductases: electron
impact and field desorption mass spectrometry. Anal
Biochem 101, 413–420.
22 Warkentin E, Mamat B, Sordel-Klippert M, Wicke M,
Thauer RK, Iwata M, Iwata S, Ermler U & Shima S
(2001) Structures of F
420
H
2
: NADP
+
oxidoreductase
with and without its substrates bound. EMBO J 20,
6561–6569.
23 Aufhammer SW, Warkentin E, Berk H, Shima S,
Thauer RK & Ermler U (2004) Coenzyme binding in
F
420
-dependent secondary alcohol dehydrogenase, a
member of the bacterial luciferase family. Structure 12,
361–370.
24 Shima S, Warkentin E, Grabarse W, Sordel M, Wicke
M, Thauer RK & Ermler U (2000) Structure of coen-
zyme F
420
dependent methylenetetrahydromethanopterin
H. Seedorf et al. Stereochemistry of F
420
H
2
oxidase
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 5337–5342 ª 2005 FEBS 5341
reductase from two methanogenic archaea. J Mol Biol
300, 935–950.
25 Aufhammer SW, Warkentin E, Ermler U, Hagemeier
CH, Thauer RK & Shima S (2005) Crystal structure of
methylenetetrahydromethanopterin reductase (Mer) in
complex with coenzyme F
420
: architecture of the
F
420
⁄ FMN binding site of enzymes within the nonprolyl
cis-peptide containing bacterial luciferase family. Protein
Sci 14, 1840–1849.
26 Hagemeier CH, Shima S, Thauer RK, Bourenkov G,
Bartunik HD & Ermler U (2003) Coenzyme F
420
-depen-
dent methylenetetrahydromethanopterin dehydrogenase
(Mtd) from Methanopyrus kandleri: a methanogenic
enzyme with an unusual quarternary structure. J Mol
Biol 332, 1047–1057.
27 Vorholt JA, Chistoserdova L, Lidstrom ME & Thauer
RK (1998) The NADP-dependent methylene tetrahydro-
methanopterin dehydrogenase in Methylobacterium
extorquens AM1. J Bacteriol 180 , 5351–5356.
28 Bartoschek S, Buurman G, Thauer RK, Geierstanger
BH, Weyrauch JP, Griesinger C, Nilges M, Hutter
MC & Helms V (2001) Re-face stereospecificity of
methylenetetrahydromethanopterin and
methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenases is predeter-
mined by intrinsic properties of the substrate. Chembio-
chem 2, 530–541.
29 Shima S & Thauer RK (2001) Tetrahydromethanop-
terin-specific enzymes from Methanopyrus kandleri.
Methods Enzymol 331, 317–353.
30 Escalante-Semerena JC, Rinehart KL Jr & Wolfe RS
(1984) Tetrahydromethanopterin, a carbon
carrier in methanogenesis. J Biol Chem 259,
9447–9455.
31 Selmer T, Kahnt J, Goubeaud M, Shima S, Grabarse W,
Ermler U & Thauer RK (2000) The biosynthesis of
methylated amino acids in the active site region of
methyl-coenzyme M reductase. J Biol Chem 275, 3755–
3760.
Stereochemistry of F
420
H
2
oxidase H. Seedorf et al.
5342 FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 5337–5342 ª 2005 FEBS