Group 10
I.
Econometrics Report
INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................3
1.
Overall about econometrics.............................................................................3
2.
Why choosing OLS?...................................................................................................4
II. QUESTION OF INTEREST...............................................................................................5
III.
ECONOMIC MODEL..........................................................................................................5
1.
Choosing the variables.......................................................................................5
2.
Embedding that target in a general unrestricted model (GUM)
8
IV. ECONOMETRICS MODEL....................................................................................................9
1.
Population regression function (PRF).....................................................9
2.
Sample regression function (SRF)...............................................................9
V.
DATA COLLECTION.........................................................................................................10
1.
Data overview..........................................................................................................10
2.
Data description...................................................................................................10
VI. ESTIMATION OF ECONOMETRIC MODEL...................................................................10
1.
Checking the correlation among variables:.......................................10
2.
Regression run........................................................................................................12
VII.
CHECK MULLTICOLLINEARITY AND HETEROSCEDASTICITY.........................15
1.
Multicollinearity.................................................................................................15
2.
Heteroskedasticity..............................................................................................16
VIII.
HYPOTHESES POSTULATED...................................................................................19
1.
The t test.................................................................................................................19
2.
Confidence Intervals............................................................................................21
3.
P- Value......................................................................................................................22
4.
Testing the overall significance: The F test..................................23
IX. RESULT ANALYSIS AND POLICY IMPLICATION..................................................24
X.
CONCLUSION.....................................................................................................................24
XI. REFERENCES.....................................................................................................................25
Figure 1........................................................7
Figure 2........................................................9
1
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add
Group 10
Econometrics Report
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
3.......................................................10
4.......................................................11
5.......................................................13
6.......................................................15
7.......................................................16
8.......................................................18
9.......................................................21
2
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add
Group 10
Econometrics Report
I. INTRODUCTION
1.Overall about econometrics
Econometrics
is
the
application
of
statistical
methods
to
economic data and is described as the branch of economics that
aims to give empirical content to economic relations. Precisely
speaking, it is the quantitative analysis of actual economic
problems,
based
on
the
concurrent
development
of
theory
and
observation, related by appropriate methods of inference. It is
understandable
that
economist
make
comparison
econometrics
is
like an effective tool to convert mountains of data into extract
simple relationships.
The reason why econometrics is effective is economics theory
use statistical theory and mathematical statistics to evaluate
and develop econometrics method. In reality, econometrics help
economists to assess economic theories, developing econometrics
model, analyzing and forecasting the economic history.
Aware of the importance of econometrics to economic phenomena,
our group decides to carry out a research of econometrics: “The
factors that have influence on median housing price” and aim to
analyze statistic and point out differences and their reason of
price level.
The data set has 506 observations with 12 variables in total.
We choose 6 variables: price, crime, nox, rooms, dist and proptax
to do the research in which price is dependent variable and the
other five are independent variables. The general method used in
3
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add
Group 10
Econometrics Report
this research is OLS (ordinary least squares). In addition, the
specialized method is estimate, running Stata software as well.
During carrying out this research, our group is so lucky to
be guided thoroughly by Dr. Dinh Thi Thanh Binh. We are grateful
for everything you have taught us!
This is the first time our group carry out an econometrics
research, our performance is unavoidable to have many mistakes.
It would be a pleasure if we can receive the feedback from you to
better ourselves next time.
2.Why choosing OLS?
Ordinary
least
squares (OLS)
is
a
type
of linear
least
squares method for estimating the unknown parameters in a linear
regression model.
function of
of least
a
set
squares:
differences
OLS
chooses
the
of explanatory
minimizing
between
the
the
parameters
variables by
sum
of
the
observed dependent
of
a linear
the
principle
squares
of
variable in
the
the
given dataset and those predicted by the linear function.
With the six selected variables, we use the OLS model because
all regressions variable are exogenous variables, the effects of
independent
variables
on
the
dependent
variable
are
linear
effects. In addition, the estimates calculated by means of the
least squares OLS are linear estimates that are not deviate and
are better than others.
When using OLS, we have some basic assumptions:
4
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add
Group 10
Econometrics Report
1.
The regression model is linear in the parameters
2.
X values are fixed in repeated sampling, which means Xi
and ui are uncorrelated
3.
Zero mean value of disturbance (E(ui)) =0)
4.
Homoscedasticity or equal variance of ui : var(ui) = σ 2
5.
No correlation between disturbances
6.
The model is correctly specified.
7.
Number of observations must be greater than the number
of parameters to be estimated.
II.
8.
X values in a given sample must not be the same.
9.
No perfect multicollinearity.
10.
Normal distribution.
QUESTION OF INTEREST
We have always been wondering “Why do housing prices among
locations and regions differ so much?”. Housing prices are affected
by
many
different
factors
such
as
structure,
neighborhood,
accessibility, air pollution and so on. To seek the answer to
that question, our group is going to use the collected data to
build and run the regression model and then the results are going
to be analyzed to finally answer the question of interest above.
III. ECONOMIC MODEL
According the provided data, the economic model used in this
report is an empirical one. Note that the fundamental model is
mathematical; with an empirical model, however, data is gathered
for the variables and using accepted statistical techniques, the
data are used to provide estimates of the model's values.
1. Choosing the variables
5
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add
Group 10
Econometrics Report
Having described data via the command “des” in file… from
Stata software, we gain the result as following:
. des
obs:
506
vars:
12
31 Oct 1996 16:37
size:
22,770
6
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add
Group 10
Econometrics Report
valu
e
Variable name
storag
display
labe
e type
format
l
variable label
median housing
price
float
%9.0g
price, $
crimes
committed per
crime
float
%9.0g
capita
nit ox concen;
nox
float
%9.0g
parts per 100m
avg number of
rooms
float
%9.0g
rooms
wght dist to 5
dist
float
%9.0g
employ centers
access. index
radial
byte
%9.0g
to rad. hghwys
property tax
proptax
float
%9.0g
per $1000
average
student-
stratio
float
%9.0g
teacher ratio
perc of people
lowstat
float
%9.0g
'lower status'
lprice
float
%9.0g
log(price)
7
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add
Group 10
Econometrics Report
lnox
float
%9.0g
log(nox)
lproptax
float
%9.0g
log(proptax)
Figure 1
The above table reveal that this is the statistic of factors
which have influence in housing price via 506 observations. After
discussing
choose
carefully,
a
dependent
our
group
variable
jumped
Y:
Price,
into
a
conclusion
independent
to
variable
contains:
X1-crime
X2-nox
X3-rooms
X4-dist
X5-proptax
Price=f (x )
2. Embedding
that
target
in
a
general
unrestricted
model
(GUM)
In its simplest acceptable representation (which will later be
specified in the econometric model), the GUM of is determined to
be:
Price=f (crime , nox , rooms , dist , proptax)
A brief description of each variable is given in Figure 1.
8
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add
Group 10
Econometrics Report
Name
Meaning
Expected
sign
Dependent
Price
Median housing price
+
Crime
Number of crimes
-
Variable (Y)
committed per capita
Nox
The amount of nitrogen
Independent
oxide concentrator parts
Variables (X)
in the air per 100m
Rooms
The average number of
-
+
rooms
Dist
Weight distance to 5
-
employ centers
Proptax
Property tax per $1000
-
Figure 2
IV.
ECONOMETRICS MODEL
1. Population regression function (PRF)
PRF:
Price=β 0 + β 1 × crime + β 2 × nox+ β 3 ×rooms+ β 4 × dist + β 5 × proptax+u i
2. Sample regression function (SRF)
SRF:
9
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add
Group 10
Econometrics Report
^
Price= β^0 + ^
β 1 × crime + ^
β 2 × nox+ β^3 ×rooms+ ^
β 4 × dist + β^5 × proptax
where:
is the intercept of the regression model
is the slope coefficient of the independent variable
is the disturbance of the regression model
^
β 0 is the estimator of
^
β iis the estimator of
μi is the residual (the estimator of
^
)
V. DATA COLLECTION
1. Data overview
This set of data is collected from a given source, therefore
it is a secondary one.
The structure of Economic data: cross-sectional data
2. Data description
To get statistic indicators of the variables, in Stata, the
following command is used:
. sum
Variab
le
price
crime
Std.
Obs
506
506
Mean
Dev.
Min
Max
22511.
9208.85
51
6
5000
50001
3.6115
8.59024
0.00
88.97
36
7
6
6
10
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add
Group 10
Econometrics Report
nox
5.5497
1.15839
83
5
6.2840
0.70259
51
38
3.7957
2.10613
51
7
40.823
16.8537
72
1
506
rooms
506
dist
506
propta
x
506
3.85
8.71
3.56
8.78
1.13
12.13
18.7
71.1
Figure 3
where:
Obs is the number of observations
Std. Dev is the standard deviation of the variable
Min is the minimum value of the variable
Max is the maximum value of the variable
VI.
ESTIMATION OF ECONOMETRIC MODEL
1. Checking the correlation among variables:
price
crime
price
crime
nox
rooms
dist
proptax
1
1
1
1
-0.3879
nox
-0.426
0.4212
rooms
0.6958
-0.2188
-0.3028
11
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add
Group 10
dist
proptax
Econometrics Report
0.2493
-0.3799
-0.7702
0.2054
-0.4671
0.5828
0.667
-0.2921
1
-0.5344
1
Figure 4
First and foremost, the correlation of Price and nox, crime,
rooms, dist, proptax is checked by calculating the correlation
coefficient
among
these
variables.
The
correlation
coefficient
measures the strength and direction of a linear relationship
between two variables on a scatterplot. In Stata, the correlation
with matrix is generated the command:
corr price crime nox rooms dist proptax
We can see from the matrix, it can be inferred that the
correlation between price and each of the independent variable is
decent enough to run the regression model. Specifically:
-
Correlation coefficient between price and crime is -0.3879 =>
price and crime have a moderate relationship.
-
Correlation coefficient between price and nox is -0.426 =>
price and nox have a moderate relationship.
-
Correlation coefficient between price and rooms is 0.6958 =>
price and rooms have a moderate relationship.
-
Correlation coefficient between price and dist is 0.2493 =>
price and dist have a weak relationship.
-
Correlation coefficient between price and proptax is -0.4671
=> price and proptax have a moderate relationship.
Independent
variables
including
Rooms
and
Dist
have
correlation coefficient larger than 0, which means they are in
directly
relationship
with
dependent
variable.
The
highest
12
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add
Group 10
Econometrics Report
coefficient is 0.6958 (between Rooms and Price) points out that
Rooms
have
the
strongest
impaction
on
Price.
When
rooms
increases, then price will increase much. On the other hands, the
correlation
coefficient
between
Price
and
Dist
is
0.2493.
It
implies that they have not strong connection. Even if the Dist
increases, Price increases but not much.
In addition, all variables have correlation coefficient not larger
than 0.8 so this model does not have multicollinearity problem.
2. Regression run
Having checked the required condition of correlation among
variables, the regression model is ready to run. In Stata, this
is done by using the command:
Reg price nox crime rooms dist proptax
Number
of obs
=
506
500)
=
142.92
Prob > F
=
0
=
0.5883
F(
Source
SS
df
MS
Model
2.52E+10
5
5.04E+09
5,
RResidual
1.76E+10
500
35258403.7
squared
13
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add
Group 10
Econometrics Report
Adj R-
Total
4.28E+10
505
84803032
Std.
squared
=
0.5842
Root MSE
=
5937.9
[95%
price
Coef.
Err.
t
P>t
Conf.
Interval]
crime
-150.0703 38.11571
-3.94
0
-224.957
-75.18364
nox
-1737.66 410.7763
-4.23
0
-2544.72
-930.5992
rooms
7707.327 399.0772
19.31
0
6923.252
8491.402
dist
-791.2588 197.9444
-4
0
1180.164
-402.3535
proptax
-89.95717 23.61555
_cons
-9060.303 3978.871
-3.81
-2.28
0
136.3551
0.02
-
3
16877.67
-43.55923
-1242.937
Figure 5
From table above we have Sample Regression Function:
Price
=
-9060.303
-
1737.66*nox
+
7707.327*rooms
-
89.95717*proptax
From the result, it can be inferred that
crime, nox, rooms, dist, proptax all have statistically significant
effects on price at the 5% significant level (as all p-values are
smaller than 0.05). In particular, those effects can be specified by
the regression coefficients as follows:
β0 = -9060.303
14
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add
Group 10
Econometrics Report
1 = -1737.66 means that if nit ox concen per 100m increases by
one , average housing price will decrease by 1737.66 in condition
other factors do not change.
2
=
-150.0703
means
that
if
crimes
committed
per
capital
increases by one , average housing price will decrease by 150.0703
in condition other factors do not change.
3 = 7707.327 means that if average number of rooms increases by
one, average housing price will increase by 7707.327 in condition
other factors do not change.
4 = -791.2588 means that if weight distance to 5 employ centers
increases 1 unit, average housing price will decrease by 791.2588
in condition other factors do not change.
5
=
-89.95717
means
that
if
average
property
tax
per
$1000
increases by one, average housing price will decrease by 89.95717
in condition other factors do not change.
The
coefficient
independent
jointly
variable
of
variables
explain
58.83%
(price);
determination
(crime,
of
other
nox,
the
R-squared=0.5883:
rooms,
variation
factors
that
dist,
in
are
all
proptax,)
the
dependent
not
mentioned
explain the remaining 41.17% of the variation in the price.
Other indicators:
- Adjusted coefficient of determination adj R-squared = 0.5842
- Total Sum of Squares TSS = 4,28E+14
- Explained Sum of Squares ESS = 2,52E+14
- Residual Sum of Squares RSS = 1,76E+14
- The degree of freedom of Model Dfm= 5
- The degree of freedom of residual Dfr = 500
VII.
CHECK MULLTICOLLINEARITY AND HETEROSCEDASTICITY
15
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add
Group 10
Econometrics Report
1. Multicollinearity
Multicollinearity is the high degree of correlation amongst
the
explanatory
variables,
which
may
make
it
difficult
to
separate out the effects of the individual regressors, standard
errors may be overestimated and t-value depressed.
Detect multicollinearity
o
Method 1: Use cor command to examine multicollinearity
If independent variables are strongly correlated (r > 0.8),
multicollinearity may occur.
price
crime
nox
rooms
dist
proptax
price
1.0000
crime
-0.3879
1.0000
nox
-0.426
0.4212
1.0000
rooms
0.6958
-0.2188
-0.3028
1.0000
dist
0.2493
-0.3799
-0.7702
0.2054
1.0000
proptax
-0.4671
0.5828
0.667
-0.2921
-0.5344
1.0000
Figure 6
From
the
table
above,
we
can
easily
see
that
correlating
coefficient among independent variables are pretty low and all
smaller
than
0.8.
As
a
result,
we
can
conclude
that
multicollinearity does not occur in this model.
o
Method 2: Use variance inflation factor (VIF)
If VIF > 10, multicollinearity occurs.
16
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add
Group 10
Econometrics Report
Variable
VIF
1/VIF
nox
3.24
0.308352
dist
2.49
0.401709
proptax
2.27
0.440742
crime
1.54
0.651256
rooms
1.13
0.888073
Mean VIF
2.13
Figure 7
The table shows that all VIF value is smaller than 10, thus,
multicollinearity does not is occur in this model.
We
can
draw
a
conclusion
from
2
methods
above
that
multicollinearity not too worrisome a problem for this set of
data.
2. Heteroskedasticity
Another problem that our model can suffer from when being
examined is heteroskedasticity. Heteroskedasticity may result in
the
situation
that
some
least
squared
estimators
are
still
unbiased but are no longer effective, along with that, estimators
of variances will become biased, thus lead to the reduction in
effectiveness of our model.
When the assumption of variance of each error term Ui is
unchanged when i moves from 1, 2 to n. It can also be rewritten
as:
Var (Ui) = Var (Uj)
i=1,2,3,…,n
17
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add
Group 10
Econometrics Report
j=1,2,3,…,n
When that assumption is violated, heteroskedasticity appears
Causes
o
Essence of economic phenomena: If economic phenomena
is examined on subjects having difference in scale or they
are examined under periods of time that are not similar in
fluctuation level.
o
Model’s function is wrongly formatted, maybe because
appropriate variables are missing or function analysis is
false.
o
cannot fully and correctly reflect the essence of
economic
phenomena.
For
example,
external
observations
appear. Bringing in or eliminate these observations does
great impact on regression analysis.
o
Error tends to decrease as data collecting, conserving
and processing techniques are improved
o
Hypothesis:
Behaviors in the past are learnt.
{
H 0 :the variance is homogenous
H 1 :the variance is not homogenous
Using the command estat hettest in STATA:
Breusch-Pagan / Cook-Weisberg test for heteroskedasticity
Ho: Constant variance
18
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add
Group 10
Econometrics Report
Variables: fitted values of price
chi2(1)
=
26.56
Prob > chi2
=
0.0000
We can see that Prob > chi2 = 0.0000 < 0.05 => We reject H0,
accept H1
We can conclude that heteroskedasticity does occur in this
model
Correcting heteroskedasticity
We use command:
reg price crime nox rooms dist proptax, robust
we have the result
Number
of
obs
=
F(
506
5,
103.2
500)
=
2
Prob > F
=
0
0.588
R-squared
=
3
5937.
Root MSE
=
9
Robust
price
Coef.
Std. Err. t
P>t
[95% Conf. Interval]
crime
-150.0703 30.45247
-4.93
0
-209.9009
-90.23976
nox
-1737.66
389.6642
-4.46
0
-2503.241
-972.0787
rooms
7707.327
670.6304
11.49
0
6389.726
9024.928
19
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add
Group 10
dist
Econometrics Report
-791.2588 175.744
-4.5
0
-1136.546
-445.9712
proptax -89.95717 26.84788
-3.35
0.001
-142.7057
-37.20862
_cons
-1.68
0.094
-19667.75
1547.148
-9060.303 5398.964
Figure 8
Note that comparing the results with the earlier regression,
none of the coefficient estimates changed, but the standard errors
and hence the t values are different, which gives reasonably more
accurate p values.
VIII. HYPOTHESES POSTULATED
1. The t test
Hypothesis:
t s=
{
H 0 : β 1=0
H 1 : β1≠ 0
^
β1 −0
=−4.93
se( β^1 )
c(500)0.025 = 1.965 < |ts | => Reject H 0
Conclusion:
Number
of
crimes
committed
per
capita
has
statistically signifincant effect on median housing price. Higher
number of crimes commited per capita, lower median housing price
Hypothesis:
t s=
{
H 0 : β 2=0
H 1 : β2≠ 0
^
β2 −0
=−4.46
se( β^2 )
c(500)0.025 = 1.965 < |ts | => Reject H 0
20
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add
Group 10
Econometrics Report
Conclusion:
nitrogen
oxide
concentrator
per
100m
has
statistically signifincant effect on median housing price. Higher
nitrogen oxide concentrator per 100m, lower median housing price.
Hypothesis:
t s=
{
H 0 : β 3=0
H 1 : β3≠ 0
^
β3 −0
=11.49
se( β^ )
3
c(500)0.025 = 1.965 < |ts | => Reject H 0
Conclusion:
The
average
number
of
rooms
has
statistically
signifincant effect on median housing price, higher average number
of rooms, higher median housing price.
Hypothesis:
t s=
{
H 0 : β 4 =0
H 1 : β4 ≠ 0
^
β 4−0
=¿ -4.5
se( β^ )
4
c(500)0.025 = 1.965 < |ts | => Reject H 0
Conclusion weight distance to 5 employ centers has statistically
signifincant effect on median housing price, higher weight distance
to 5 employ centers, lower median housing price.
21
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add
Group 10
Hypothesis:
t s=
Econometrics Report
{
H 0 : β 5=0
H 1 : β5≠ 0
^
β5 −0
=−3.35
se( β^ )
5
c(500)0.025 = 1.965 < |ts | => Reject H 0
Conclusion Property tax per $1000 has statistically signifincant
effect on median housing price, higher property tax per $1000,
lower median housing price.
2. Confidence Intervals
Test the following hypothesis:
{
{
{
{
H 0 : β 1=0
H 1 : β1≠ 0
H 0 : β 2=0
H 1 : β2≠ 0
H 0 : β 3=0
H 1 : β3≠ 0
H 0 : β 4 =0
H 1 : β4 ≠ 0
22
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add
Group 10
Econometrics Report
{
Variable
H 0 : β 5=0
H 1 : β5≠ 0
Significant
Coefficient
Level
Confidence Interval
Const
β0
5%
(-19667.75
;
X1
β1
5%
(-209.9009
; -90.23976)
X2
β2
5%
(-2503.241
; -972.0787)
X3
β3
5%
(6389.726
X4
β4
5%
(-1136.546 ;-445.9712)
X5
β5
5%
(-142.7057
1547.148)
; 9024.928)
; -37.20862)
Figure 9
We can see that for all coefficients, 0 doesn’t belong to the
confidence interval, so we reject the hypotheses H0: H 0 : β 1=0, β 2=0 ,
β 3=0 , β 4 =0, β 5=0
Conclusion: Number of crimes committed per capita, nitrogen oxide
concentrator
per
100m,
the
average
number
of
rooms,
weight
distance to 5 employ centers and property tax per $1000 all have
statistically signifincant effect on median housing price with the
confidence level of 95%.
3. P- Value
Hypothesis testing:
{
H 0 : β 1=0
H1 : β1≠ 0
P-value = 0.0004 < α = 0.05 => Reject H0
Number
of
signifincant
crimes
effect
committed
on
median
per
housing
capita
price.
has
statistically
Higher
number
of
crimes commited per capita, lower median housing price.
23
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add
Group 10
Econometrics Report
In particular, with the sample we have, the estimated result
shows that one more crime committed decreases median housing
price by 150.07$, holding other factors fixed.
Hypothesis testing:
{
H 0 : β 2=0
H1 : β2≠ 0
P-value = 0.0004 < α = 0.05 => Reject H0
Nitrogen
oxide
concentrator
per
100m
has
statistically
signifincant effect on median housing price. Higher nitrogen oxide
concentrator per 100m, lower median housing price
In particular, with the sample we have, the estimated result
shows that one more unit in nitrogen oxide concentrator per 100m
decreases median housing price by 1737.66$, holding other factors
fixed.
Hypothesis testing:
{
H 0 : β 3=0
H 1 : β3 ≠ 0
P-value = 0.0004 < α = 0.05 => Reject H0
The average number of rooms has statistically signifincant effect
on median housing price, higher average number of rooms, higher
median housing price.
In particular, with the sample we have, the estimated result
shows that one more room added in the house increases median
housing price by 7707.33 $, holding other factors fixed.
Hypothesis testing:
{
H 0 : β 4 =0
H1 : β4 ≠ 0
P-value = 0.0004 < α = 0.05 => Reject H0
Weight distance to 5 employ centers has statistically signifincant
effect on median housing price, higher weight distance to 5 employ
centers, lower median housing price.
In particular, with the sample we have, the estimated result
shows that one more unit increased in weight distance to 5 employ
24
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add
Group 10
Econometrics Report
centers decreases median housing price by 791.25$, holding other
factors fixed.
Hypothesis testing:
{
H 0 : β 5=0
H 1 : β5 ≠ 0
P-value = 0.0008 < α = 0.05 => Reject H0
Property tax per $1000 has statistically signifincant effect on
median housing price, higher property tax per $1000, lower median
housing price.
In particular, with the sample we have, the estimated result
shows
that
one
more
$
increased
in
property
tax
per
1000$
decreases median housing price by 89.96 $, holding other factors
fixed.
4. Testing the overall significance: The F test
This test is to examine if the parameters of the independent
variable βi at the same time can be zero.
The hypothesis is as follows:
¿
F qs =
As
R 2 (n−k )
( 1−R2 ) ( k −1 )
a
= 142.92
result,
there
>
is
500
F 5;
0,05 =2.23
enough
evidence
to
reject
the
null
hypothesis and conclude that at least one independent variable in
the subset does have explanatory or predictive power on price, so
we don’t reduce the model by dropping out this subset.
IX.
RESULT ANALYSIS AND POLICY IMPLICATION
From data analysis in previous sections, we have gained an
overall view of data set given in term of the satistical
25
LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add