Tải bản đầy đủ (.pdf) (3 trang)

Andersons pediatric cardiology 1121

Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (107.98 KB, 3 trang )

HistoricalPerspective
Theswingtoaninterventionalapproachinthetreatmentofpulmonaryvalvar
stenosisresultedfromapartnershipbetweencardiologistsandradiologists.The
firstcaseofcatheterinterventionforpulmonaryvalvarstenosiswasreportedin
1953.55Auretericcathetermodifiedwithawirewasintroducedthroughthe
pulmonaryvalve,thewirebeingtensionedtoformabow-shapeddeviceusedto
incisethestenosedvalve.55Later,thesametechniquewasusedforthestenosed
tricuspidvalve.56Theuseofastandardangiographicballoontodisruptthe
pulmonaryvalvewasdescribedin1979.57Thetechniqueinvolvedarapid
pullback,inseptostomyfashion,oftheballooncatheterfromthepulmonary
trunktotherightventricularoutflowtract.Meanwhile,gradeddilationwas
beingdevelopedforatheroscleroticvessels,58includingimportanttechnical
developmentsinguidewiresandcatheters.59,60Furtherrefinementsallowedthe
techniquestobeappliedtosmallervessels,includingthecoronaryarteries,61–64
usingadouble-lumenballooncatheterdesignedtobeusedoveraguidewire.Itis
notcommonlyknownthatthefirstsuccessfulstaticballoondilationofthe
pulmonaryvalve,aswenowknowthetechnique,wasperformedinanEnglish
bulldogin1980,65priortothefirstreportofthesuccessfulprocedurein1982in
achild.66Sinceitwasfirstperformed,thetechniquehasrapidlybecomethe
treatmentofchoiceforpulmonaryvalvarstenosis.Apartfromimprovementsin
thedesignofballoonangioplastycathetersandguidewirestoimprovetheprofile
andtrackingabilityoftheproducts,theproceduraltechniquehasnotchanged
significantlysinceitsinception.Onlyoneotherinterventionaltechniquewas
reportedtotreatpulmonarystenosis.Thisinvolvedanendovasculardevicewith
anextendabledoublebladedesignedtobeextendedinthepulmonarytrunkand
drawnbackthroughthepulmonaryvalvetodisruptthestenosedleaflets.67After
thefirstreportofthreechildrentreatedinShanghai,nofurtherreporthasbeen
publishedintheliterature.Morerecently,transcatheterpulmonaryvalve
implantationhasbeenadvocatedforselectedpatientswithrefractoryvalvar
pulmonarystenosis.68


Indications
Indicationsforinterventioninchildrenarewidelydiscussedintheliterature,
withequallywidevariabilityinthecriteriaforselection.Theindicationsfor
catheterinterventionshouldbesimilartotheindicationsforasurgicalapproach,


and―becauseofthelessinvasive,expensive,andtime-consumingadvantagesof
catheterintervention―thistechniqueremainsthefirstchoiceinallcenters.
Historically,mostgroupswouldinterveneiftheechocardiographicallyderived
peakinstantaneousgradientacrossthepulmonaryvalvewereinexcessof64
mmHg,correlatingwithaDopplervelocityofmorethan4ms–1,whereasother
groupshaverecommendedathresholdofapeakinstantaneouspressuregradient
ofgreaterthan50mmHg69whencardiacoutputisnormal.Inpatientsinacute
orchronicheartfailure,thecapacityoftheventricletogeneratehigherpressures
isimpaired,cardiacoutputisreduced,andalowerthresholdforintervention
mustbeapplied.
ThemostrecentAmericanHeartAssociationrecommendations(Box42.2)list
criticalvalvarpulmonarystenosispresentatbirth,valvarpulmonicstenosiswith
apeakinstantaneousgradientgreaterthan40mmHg,aswellasclinically
significantvalvarobstructioninthepresenceofrightventriculardysfunctionas
classIindicationsfortranscatheterballoonpulmonaryvalvuloplasty.70


Box42.2

RecommendationsforPulmonary
Valvuloplasty
ClassI
Pulmonaryvalvuloplastyisindicatedforapatientwithcriticalvalvar
pulmonarystenosis(definedaspulmonarystenosispresentatbirthwith

cyanosisandevidenceofpatentductusarteriosusdependency),valvarpulmonic
stenosis,andapeak-to-peakcathetergradientorechocardiographicpeak
instantaneousgradientof>40mmHgorclinicallysignificantpulmonaryvalvar
obstructioninthepresenceofrightventricular(RV)dysfunction(Levelof
Evidence:A).

ClassIIA
1.Itisreasonabletoperformpulmonaryvalvuloplastyonapatientwith
valvarpulmonicstenosiswhomeetsthepreviouslydescribedcriteriain
thesettingofadysplasticpulmonaryvalve(LevelofEvidence:C).


2.Itisreasonabletoperformpulmonaryvalvuloplastyinnewbornswith
pulmonaryvalveatresiaandanintactventricularseptumwhohavea
favorableanatomythatexcludesRV-dependentcoronarycirculation
(LevelofEvidence:C).

ClassIIB
Pulmonaryvalvuloplastymaybeconsideredasapalliativeprocedureina
patientwithcomplexcyanoticcoronaryheartdisease,includingsomerarecases
oftetralogyofFallot(LevelofEvidence:C).

ClassIII
Pulmonaryvalvuloplastyshouldnotbeperformedinpatientswithpulmonary
atresiaandRV-dependentcoronarycirculation(LevelofEvidence:B).
FromFeltesTF,BachaE,BeekmanRH3rd.etal.Indicationsforcardiac
catheterizationandinterventioninpediatriccardiacdisease:ascientific
statementfromtheAmericanHeartAssociation.Circulation.
2011;123(22):2607–2652.
Althoughsomeattentionhasbeenpaidtointerventioninmildercases,the

evidenceforprogressionofmildstenosisislacking41andfollow-upcaneasily
determinethecasesthatdoprogress,withtheoptiontoplananinterventionstill
availableevenuptoadultlife.71–75Inadultswithmoderatetoseverestenosis,
signssuchaspersistentexerciseintolerance,pressureoverload,andtheriskof
rightventricularfibrosisaregoodindicationsforintervention69,74despitethe
usuallackofsymptoms.
Infantspresentingintheneonatalperiodwithmoderateorseverestenosis,
especiallythosepresentingwithaduct-dependentpulmonarycirculation,should
betreatedurgently.76–79

StandardTechnique
Thestandardsetupfortranscatheterballoonpulmonaryvalvuloplastyisnot
dissimilartothatemployedformostcardiaccatheterizationprocedures
performedinpatientswithcongenitalheartdisease(seeChapters17and18).
Fig.42.29depictsthestandardproceduralstagesofballoonpulmonary



×