Tải bản đầy đủ (.pdf) (4 trang)

The IT Outsourcing RFx COW is Too Fat potx

Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (128.4 KB, 4 trang )

The IT Outsourcing RFx COW is Too Fat
By Ernie Zibert
Copyright 2011 Ernie Zibert
Smashwords Edition
Smashwords Edition, License Notes
Thank you for downloading this free ebook. Although this is a free book, it remains the copyrighted
property of the author, and may not be reproduced, copied and distributed for commercial or non-
commercial purposes. If you enjoyed this book, please encourage your friends to download their own
copy at Smashwords.com, where they can also discover other works by this author. Thank you for
your support.
Discover other titles by Ernie Zibert at Smashwords.com.
Table of Contents
Smarter
Cheaper
Faster
Better
Greener
About the author
Other books by this author
Contact the author
In this booklet I cover the important topic of tendering for IT Outsourcing (ITO) Services.
Tendering (RFP, RFI, RFx) is the one domain of IT sourcing which has not moved in line with the
changes in the market-place. The IT tendering process is important, but not critical to value
maximisation. Why? Because most of the value lost in IT sourcing comes after the contract is signed.
According to The Corporate Executive Board Company (2009) 90% of ‘this loss occurs after the
vendor has been chosen’. Since the tendering process only accounts for up to 10% of potential value,
customers should ensure that their tendering process is smart, cheap, fast, better and greener than
historical or traditional tendering models. What does this mean?
SMART
Do not re-invent the wheel. Most IT services, and indeed, all infrastructure related IT services
are mature and so are the tendering processes. If you’re not sure on the best practice process, invest


two hours Googling. You can readily download tender evaluation and process documentation. Ask the
IT Service Providers to supply you with their standard T&Cs. If you believe your firm is special and
has unique requirements you are insane. If you believe that you should dance with the service
provider because accepting their boilerplate contact T&C’s gives them too much power in the
relationship you are crazy. As I noted above, most of the value lost in IT sourcing comes after the
contract is signed. IT Service Providers negotiate IT contracts on a weekly basis. They are far more
experienced and knowledgeable than any customer or legal team. Do not try to outplay them. Simply
ensure your key requirements for the service elements are covered.
Do not worry about developing a complex and extensive tender response criteria before you
start the tendering process. This is what I mean by COW. COW is an acronym for Criteria, Options,
and Weighting (how much importance you assign to that criteria). COWs are always used by
customers in all tenders to evaluate responses, with the end result producing a Score for each
response. You should not spend considerable time in developing your COW as the responses from IT
Service Providers will enable you to augment your COW. For example, in the Service Providers
response they will invariably identify a novel option to meet your IT service requirement. You can then
use this option in your COW. (COWS is a best practice decision matrix.)
Source for table: RFP Evaluation Centers, Inc
Also refer to the Value Stream Guru for more information on COWS.
CHEAP
Make the entire tendering process as cheap as possible. For most IT infrastructure services,
you should aim for a small percentage of the contact value. I considered stating an exact figure, but
the figure is always skewed in small contracts and the percentage will reduce for larger contracts.
With this in mind, I recommend capping the tender cost to ten percent or less of the annual
service cost. For medium and larger outsourcing services you should invest in a web based supplier
selection tool. This investment will cost less than $2,000 USD.
FAST
It is totally unacceptable in this era to waste many months tendering for the majority of IT
services. The Cloud Service Model supports a faster tendering process. Using a Cloud Service you
are simply three mouse clicks away from three quotes. You want to know what the T&C’s are then
simply read it on their web page. Again, you are only three clicks away from obtaining the

accompanying T&Cs. The duration of the tendering process is correlated to the cost. So the rule here
is to keep it short. I recommend no more than four weeks for the majority of infrastructure
services.
For example, for on-site support you should know all of your company’s sites, so just get the
quote and the concomitant T&C’s. For a Service Desk service, you should know your hours of
coverage and call volumes. For monitoring and management of your servers and network, you should
know how many servers (virtual or physical) you have and their location.
BETTER
To make your tendering process better ensure you have built flexibility into your contract.
Again, cloud based services have led the way here. Most offer a one month service term. Some even
offer a per hour cost model. The key here is to make the terms of any agreement short, no more than
12 months and make certain you have a one month or at the very least a 90 days no fault, no
fee, exit clause. A lot of change can occur in 12 months and you want to ensure you can respond
effectively to any changes and not be constrained by an out-of-date or misaligned IT services
contract.
GREENER
This dimension of sourcing business value is largely dependent on the above four value
attributes. If you are smart and don’t waste hours on your computer/tablet inventing and printing a
contract and its numerous drafts you are greener. If you keep your IT tendering process cheap and
fast you are greener. Spending less time means less potential for waste; less meetings, less people,
less noise. Using an external service provider is intrinsically greener as you are leveraging off an
already existing set of services. For example, hosting your server room in a data centre will, at the
very least, save your environmentals of air-conditioning and power.
Saving money is one of the non-negotiable rules of the tender process. And saving money can
only occur after the contract is signed. So why waste time in realising the savings of your IT
outsourcing initiatives. Make your sourcing COW lean and green. Remember that the time you spend
in the tender process delays the realisation of the savings and value from your sourcing initiative. So
keep your IT tendering process smart, cheap, fast, better and greener.
About the author:
Ernie Zibert is a senior IT sourcing professional and brings eighteen years international management

experience across government, communications and media, and finance industries. His transferable
skills include IT sourcing strategy and governance, and financial, relationship and commercial
management of external service providers. Annual spend under management includes up to $200M
AUD along with 20% savings.
Other titles by Ernie Zibert
Discover other titles by Ernie Zibert at Smashwords.com.
The Science of Sourcing Governance
What’s the difference between a million and a billion dollar IT sourcing deal?
Ordering IT Services: Would you like CHIPS with that?
Connect with Me Online:
My blog:
For more information, contact Ernie Zibert at

×