Nghiên cứu tổng hợp TiO2 AC, TiO2 GO và đưa lên gốm cordierite làm xúc tác cho quá trình quang phân hủy metyl da cam và phenol

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING
HANOI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Nguyen Trung Hieu

RESEARCH INTO TiO2/AC, TiO2/GO SYNTHESIS AND COATING ON
CORDIERITE CERAMIC APPLIED AS CATALYSTS FOR
PHOTODEGRADATION OF METHYL ORANGE AND PHENOL

DOCTORAL DISSERTATION IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING

Hanoi – 2022


MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING
HANOI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Nguyen Trung Hieu

RESEARCH INTO TiO2/AC, TiO2/GO SYNTHESIS AND COATING ON
CORDIERITE CERAMIC APPLIED AS CATALYSTS FOR
PHOTODEGRADATION OF METHYL ORANGE AND PHENOL
Major

: Chemical Engineering

Code No

9520301

DOCTORAL DISSERTATION IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING

ADVISOR: Prof. Le Minh Thang

Hanoi – 2022


GUARANTEE
The study has been conducted at the School of Chemical Engineering (SCE),
Germany and Vietnam catalyst research center (Gevicat), Hanoi University of Science
and Technology (HUST).
I affirm that this is my own research. The co-authors consented to the use of all
the data and findings presented in the thesis and confirmed their veracity. This study
has not been published by anybody but me.
Hanoi, Octorber 25th 2022
Thesis Advisor

PhD student

Prof. Le Minh Thang

Nguyen Trung Hieu

iii


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to express my sincerest and heartfelt gratitude to the following
people and organizations whose valuable contributions and assistances have made my
research possible:
To Hanoi University of Science and Technology, specifically to the School of
Chemical Engineering, Department of Organic and Petrochemical Technology for

providing the laboratory instruments and the equipment for me to accomplish my
research.
To - Catalyst Program, for letting me be an official member of the sponsored
research on modified TiO2 synthesis and methyl orange and phenol photocatalytic
degradation at Hanoi University (HUST) and National Taiwan University (NTU).

To my thesis adviser, Prof. Dr. Le Minh Thang, for giving me guidance and
supervision as well as critiques and comments on my progress reports to bring me
patience, finance, and power to finish this research.
To Prof. Dr. Jeffrey Chi-Sheng Wu, for allowing me to be a part of his research
team under the RoHan Program and for training me in his Lab at NTU.
To my family and friends who always try to encourage and motivate me during
my thesis course, especially since it is the late gift for my father in heaven now.


TABLE OF CONTENTS
GUARANTEE............................................................................................................... i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS........................................................................................ ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................................................................... iii
LIST OF ABREVIATIONS....................................................................................... vi
LIST OF TABLES..................................................................................................... vii
LIST OF FIGURES.................................................................................................. viii
INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................... 1
1. Necessity of the study........................................................................................... 1
2. Objectives of the study......................................................................................... 3
3. Content of the thesis............................................................................................. 4
4. Methodologies of the study.................................................................................. 4
5. Scope of the study................................................................................................. 4
6. Scientific and practical meanings........................................................................ 5
7. Novelty of the study.............................................................................................. 5

8.Structure of the thesis........................................................................................... 5
CHAPTER 1. LITERATURE REVIEW................................................................... 6
1.1. Textile industry and Methyl Orange dye......................................................... 6
1.2. Phenol in industry and its impact to the health............................................... 8
1.3. Titanium dioxide, TiO2................................................................................................................................. 9
1.4. Principles of Precipitation, sol-gel and hydrothermal synthesis methods 13
1.4.1.

Preparation of photocatalyst using sol-gel method................................ 15

1.5. Support and thin films.................................................................................... 19
1.5.1 Overview of Cordierite................................................................................ 19
1.5.2 Mesoporous TiO2 and coating techniques..................................................20
1.5.3 Catalyst Suspension and immobilization.................................................... 21
1.6

TiO2/AC Materials........................................................................................22

1.7

Graphene oxide (GO)................................................................................... 26

1.8

TiO2/GO Materials.......................................................................................28

1.9

MO photocatalytic degradation................................................................... 31

1.10 Phenol photocatalysis degradation.............................................................. 36
1.11 Summary....................................................................................................... 38


CHAPTER 2 EXPERIMENTS................................................................................. 40
2.1 Materials and instruments............................................................................... 40
2.2 Catalyst preparation........................................................................................ 42
2.2.1 Synthesis of mesoporous TiO2.............................................................................................................42
2.2.2. Synthesis of TiO2 and AC/TiO2 by Sol-gel method....................................45
2.2.3. Synthesis of TiO2 GO by sol-gel method....................................................46
2.2.4. Synthesis of TiO2 films on cordierite..........................................................48
2.3 Characterization of the catalysts..................................................................... 54
2.3.1 Morphology on the surface......................................................................... 54
2.3.2. Elemental surface composition and traces of impurities..........................56
2.3.3

Specific surface area, pore volume, and average pore size....................56

2.3.4

Crystal structures formed and the crystallite diameter..........................57

2.3.5. Absorbance................................................................................................. 58
2.3.6. UV-Vis DSR................................................................................................ 60
2.3.7. High-performance liquid chromatography analysis.................................. 60
2.4 Experimental set up.......................................................................................... 62
2.5. To calculate the efficiency of photocatalytic process..................................... 63
2.5.1 Construct calibration curve of methyl orange solution.............................. 63
2.5.2 Calculation the concentration via equation................................................ 64
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS AND DISSCUSSIONS.....................................................65

3.1. Mesoporous TiO2 synthesized by precipitation and hydrothermal with CTAB
and P123 surfactants.............................................................................................. 65
3.1.1 Characterization results.............................................................................. 65
3.1.2. MO photocatalytic degradation of mesoporous TiO2 photocatalysts
prepared by precipitation and hydrothermal methods with surfactants (CTAB
and
P123)
..............................................................................................................................
69
3.2. TiO2/AC catalyst synthesized using sol-gel method.............................................74
3. 2.1. Characterization Catalyst.......................................................................... 74
3.2.2. Photocatalytic activity of the MO in water................................................ 77
3.3. GO-TiO2 catalysts by sol-gel method....................................................................83


3.3.1. Characterization........................................................................................ 83
3.3.2 MO photocatalytic degradation by TiO2 – GO........................................... 86
3.4. TiO2 films...............................................................................................................89
3.4.1. TiO2 films on Cordierite.............................................................................89
3.4.2. TiO2 nanocatalysts thin film by the CVD method on various substrates100
3.5. Phenol photocatalytic degradation...................................................................... 107
CHAPTER 4: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMENDATONS..............................115
REFERENCES......................................................................................................... 116


LIST OF ABREVIATIONS
Symbols

Meaning

UV

Ultraviolet radiation

MO

methyl orange

GO

graphene oxide

FTIR

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

SEM

Scanning electron microscopy

FE SEM

Field Emission

EDX

Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy

P123

poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(propylene glycol)-block-poly
(ethylene glycol)

CNT

carbon nanotube

LPMOCVD

Low pressure chemical vapor deposition

AC

activated carbon

TTIP

titanium tetraisopropoxide

UV–VIS

Ultraviolet- Visible

HPLC

High-performance liquid chromatography

XRD

X-ray diffraction

BET

Brunauer, Emmett and Teller

SEM

Scanning electron microscopy

CTAB

cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide

PEG

polyethylene glycol


LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1. The General Mechanism of the Photocatalytic Reaction Process on TiO2 [49]
.......................................................................................................................................11
Table 1.2. Summary of TiO2 and GO composites used as photocatalyst......................30
Table 2.1: List of chemicals......................................................................................... 40
Table 2.2: List of main instruments.............................................................................. 41
Table 2.3: Catalyst synthesized by hydrothermal and precipitation methods using
surfactant..................................................................................................................... 44
Table 2.4 : AC to TiO2 Ratio with Corresponding Theoretical % Weight AC in
AC/TiO2 catalyst........................................................................................................... 45
Table 2.5: Catalysis films and powders synthesized by various methods with the low
concetration of PEG.................................................................................................... 50

Table 2.6: Catalyst films and powders synthesized by various methods with higher
concentration of PEG.................................................................................................. 52
Table 3.1: The surface characteristics of catalysts synthesized by hydrothermal and
precipitation methods................................................................................................... 66
Table 3.2: Crystalline sizes of catalysts....................................................................... 68
Table 3.3: Surface area of two samples by sol-gel synthesis........................................ 75
Table 3.4: Crystalline sizes of catalysts....................................................................... 77
Table 3.5: Surface area of GO-TiO2 catalysts..............................................................85
Table 3.6: Crystalline sizes of catalysts....................................................................... 86
Table 3.7: Effect of ratio mol TTIP:H2O to the catalyst mass coated..........................89
Table 3.8: Catalysts films coated cordierite................................................................. 93
Table 3.9: Apparent first-order rate constant kapp and correlation coefficient R2 for
phenol degradation by catalysts synthesized by various methods..............................109
Table 3.10: Apparent first-order rate constant kapp and correlation coefficient R2 for
phenol degradation with various initial concentrations by P123-C25-450 catalyst. .110
Table 3.11: Apparent first-order rate constant kapp and correlation coefficient R2 for
phenol degradation by P123-C25-450 catalyst with various concentrations H2O2......112
Table 3.12: Apparent first-order rate constant kapp and correlation coefficient R2 for
phenol degradation in visible light condition............................................................. 113


LIST OF FIGURES
Fig. 1.1: Chemical structure of MO molecule [33,34]................................................... 7
Fig. 1.2: TiO2 Crystal Structures[44]...........................................................................9
Fig. 1.3: The mechanism of photocatalytic activity of TiO2 [50]................................11
Fig. 1.4: Nanocrystalline Metal Oxide Preparation using Sol-Gel method.................17
Fig. 1.5: Structures of graphene, C60, CNT and graphite [109].................................27
Fig. 1.6: Structure of GO [110]................................................................................... 27
Fig. 1.7: Possible mechanism of MO with TiO2 [142].................................................34
Fig. 1.8: Production Distributions from Phenol Decomposition Reaction [152]........38

Fig. 2.1. Flowchart of TiO2 synthesis using CTAB.......................................................42
Fig. 2.2. Flowchart of TiO2 synthesis using P123........................................................43
Fig. 2.3: Flowchart of GO synthesis........................................................................... 46
Fig. 2.4: Flowchart of GO-TiO2 (GO-ZnO) synthesis.................................................47
Fig. 2.5: Dip-coating TiO2 on the surface of cordierite...............................................49
Fig. 2.6: Experimental LPCVD set-up......................................................................... 53
Fig. 2.7: Simplified internal structure of FESEM........................................................ 54
Fig. 2.8: Energy band diagram of a semiconductor (Zeghbroeck, 2007)....................60
Fig. 2.9: Principle diagram of a HPLC system........................................................... 61
Fig. 2.10a: Photocatalytic exerimental setup with UV-C lamp................................... 62
Fig. 2.10 b: Principle diagram of visible photocatalytic exerimental setup...............63
Fig. 3.1: Nitrogen isotherm of CTAB-NE and P123 C25-450..................................... 66
Fig. 3.2: Pore size distribution of CTAB-NE and P123 C25-450.................................67
Fig. 3.3: XRD paterns of catalysts synthesized with surfactants CTAB and P123.......68
Fig. 3.4: FE-SEM images of CTAB-H (a) and P123 C25-450 (b).............................69
Fig. 3.5: Evaluation of the catalysts using CTAB by two hydrothermal and
precipitation methods................................................................................................... 70
Fig. 3.6: The influence of citric acid amount to catalyst performance........................71
Fig. 3.7:The influence of Ethanol elimination method to catalyst performance..........72
Fig. 3.8: Comparing the best catalyst via hydrothermal and precipitation..................73
Fig. 3.9: Nitrogen isotherm of SG TiO2 and SG AC1200 TiO2 1/18.............................74
Fig. 3.10: Pore size distribution of SG TiO2 and SG AC1200 TiO2 1/18.....................75
Fig. 3.11: Morphology of SG AC-1200/Ti 1/18 (a) and SG AC-1200/Ti 3/1 (b)........76


Fig. 3.12: EDX analysis results of samples: SG AC-1200/Ti 1/18 (a); SG AC-1200/Ti
2/1 (b);......................................................................................................................... 76
Fig. 3.13: XRD result of AC TiO2 catalysts..................................................................77
Fig. 3.14: MO dark adsorption of AC.......................................................................... 78
Fig. 3.15: MO photodegration is affected by activated carbon category.....................79

Fig. 3.16: MO photodegradation via time of catalyst samples at pH=7.....................80
Fig. 3.17: MO photodegrdation of samples at pH= 4................................................ 81
Fig. 3.18: MO photodegradation of samples at pH= 10.............................................. 82
Fig. 3.19: Comparison the MO photodegradation SG AC1200 Ti/1/18 by pH...........83
Fig. 3.20: Nitrogen isotherm of G1/4, G1/18, G1/24................................................... 84
Fig. 3.21: Pore distribution of SGGO Ti1/4, SG GO Ti1/18,SG GO Ti1/24................84
Fig. 3.22: XRD analysis of GO catalyst...................................................................... 86
Fig. 3.23: The effect of GO content to MO photocatalytic degradation......................87
Fig. 3.24: Photodegradation of TiO2 GO catalysts with MO concentration 20 ppm
in the full range Xenon lamp........................................................................................ 88
Fig. 3.25 Photodegradation of SG GO Ti/ 1/18 MO for various concentration...........88
Fig. 3.26: (a) SEM Cor-gel-200 and (b) SEM Cor-gel-CTAB.....................................89
Fig. 3.27: Investigate the efficiency of catalyst thin films by dip coating with low
concentration of PEG.................................................................................................. 90
Fig. 3.28: SEM characterization: (a) Cor-CTAB, (b) Corgel 200 (c) Cor-P123..........92
Fig. 3.29: SEM characterization of 2 samples Corgel-150AC (a) and Cor-P123 (b)
after the first reaction.................................................................................................. 92
Fig. 3.30: The photocatalytic degradation of four samples Corgel-150, Corgel-150AC,
Corgel-200 and AC-gel powder................................................................................... 94
Fig. 3.31: Surface of Corgel-150 (left) and Corgel-150AC (right) after reaction.......94
Fig.3.32: (a) Surface of Corgel 150AC (left) and Corgel-200 (right);(b)Inside view of
Corgel-150AC (left) và Corgel-200 ( right)................................................................. 95
Fig. 3.33: Photocatalytic performance of-P123 and Cor-P123 samples....................96
Fig. 3.34: MO Photodegradation by CTAB powder and Cor-CTAB............................ 97
Fig. 3.35: MO Photodegradation with three TiO2 films coated on cordierite..............98
Fig. 3.36: The TiO2 film performance in the first and second times............................ 99
Fig. 3.37: SEM characterization of TiO2 on the surface of (a) glass, (b) aluminium, (c)
cordierite with 25,000 magnification; SEM characterization of TiO2 on the surface of

(d) glass, (e) aluminum and (f) ceramic with 100,000 magnification.
EDS characterization of TiO2 on the surface (g) glass, (h) aluminum and (i) c
cordierite.
.....................................................................................................................................101
Fig. 3.38: 10x Microscopy of TiO2 (a) 120oC; (b) 150oC; (c) 200oC; (d) 250oC; (e)
300oC......................................................................................................................... 102
Fig. 3.39: 10x Microscopy of TiO2 thin film on glass substrate at 580 mm-bar pressure
at position opposite (a) and next (b) nozzle............................................................... 103
Fig.3.40: 10x Microscopy of TiO2 thin film on glass substrate at 700 mm-bar pressure
at position opposite (a) and next (b) nozzle............................................................... 103
Fig. 3.41: 10x Microscopy of TiO2 thin film on glass substrate with carrying gas N2 300
ml/min........................................................................................................................ 104
Fig. 3.42: Visual image of TiO2 thin film on various substrates.................................104
Fig. 3.43: 10x Microscopy of TiO2 thin film on various substrates............................104
Fig. 3.44: TiO2 thin film performance for MO photodegradation with UV-C...........105
Fig. 3.45: TiO2 thin film performance for MO photodegradation with full range lamp
.....................................................................................................................................106
Fig. 3.46: Phenol degradation evaluation and kinetics study in UV light................108
Fig. 3.47: Effect of the initial concentration to the phenol degradation in UV
condition and kinetics study by P123-C25-450.......................................................... 109
Fig. 3.48: Effect of H2O2 loading and kinetics study in phenol degradation process.
.....................................................................................................................................111
Fig. 3.49: Phenol degradation process and kinetics study in visible light...................113


INTRODUCTION
1. Necessity of the study
Soil and groundwater resource pollution are serious concerns in our nation. One
of the unavoidable effects of uncoordinated economic zone growth is the
contamination of water sources with heavy metals and harmful, persistent organic

compounds such as phenol and its derivatives. The primary sources of phenol and
phenol polluting compounds are the manufacture of synthetic plastics, insecticides,
paints, and petroleum [1]. Additionally, the textile sector emits a significant number of
harmful chemical compounds into the atmosphere, including azo-based dyes, one of
which is methyl orange. As a result, the remediation of contaminated environments
with two chemical compounds as phenol and methyl orange, is a hot topic not only in
the nation, but also globally.
Historically, remediation of polluted water has been mostly dependent on
physicochemical and biological treatment approaches. Among these, adsorption is one
of the most frequently used strategies for treating chemical contaminants in water due
to its ease of use and the broad application of a variety of adsorbents. Another
workable solution is biological treatment, which may eliminate around 90% of organic
debris entirely. However, this procedure is less efficient for compounds that are
difficult to decompose, such as phenol and methyl orange. Numerous extensive
research studies have been undertaken to process the aforementioned chemicals, which
include electrochemical methods, ion exchange, ozone, and adsorption on activated
carbon [2, 3]. In the other hand, these approaches are rarely used in reality due to their
inherent constraints, which include heavy equipment systems, complex operation
techniques, high initial and ongoing expenditures, and birth abnormalities. It must
include a sludge post-treatment step, otherwise the efficiency will remain poor results.
Using photocatalysts to treat polluted water is one of the most environmentally
friendly green treatment methods available, since it employs natural solar energy and
is capable of degrading organic contaminants that are difficult to decompose. Without
the addition of extra chemicals or sludge buildup in the treatment system [4]. TiO 2,
ZnO, and Fe2O3 are among the semiconductor materials that researchers are interested
in as potential photocatalysts. Due of titanium dioxide's (TiO 2) outstanding

13

characteristics, it is the most investigated material. It is ecologically safe, chemically
and physiologically

14


inert, self-cleaning, and produces minimal byproducts during production [5].
TiO2 nanoparticles have played a key role in the photodegradation of organic
pollutants; it seems to be the most investigated photocatalyst due to its cheap cost,
photostability, abundance, and high oxidizing power against a wide range of organic
pollutants [6,7]. Despite these positive qualities, its use is limited due to its large band
gap (3.2 eV), the difficulty in separating the catalyst TiO 2 from the solution, and the
recombination of the photogenerated electron-hole pairs, which results in low
photocatalytic reaction efficiency [8]. TiO2 is effective in decomposing a vast array of
organic, inorganic, and toxic compounds in liquid and gas phase environments.
However, the 3,2 eV energy band gap of pure TiO 2 limits its use to UV light (387 nm,
or about 4% of solar radiation). Numerous approaches have been used to improve the
photocatalytic activity of TiO2, including two major classes of chemical treatments,
including doping with non-metals, transition metals, dye sensitization, spatial
structuring, and doping with rare earth metals [9]. Alternative methods include
infusing microwave or ultrasonic radiation into TiO2 photoreaction systems [10].
Activated carbon may be an ideal substrate for evaluating the drawbacks of TiO 2 when
supported by activated carbon.
. This new discovery has a great deal of potential as a result of the synergy between
the photocatalytic activity of the catalyst and the adsorptivity of the activated carbon.
The use of commercial activated carbon as an effective adsorbent for the removal of
organic pollutants from liquid phase [11] is well established. However, due to the
prohibitive cost involved, its use is severely limited. Activated carbon may also be
produced from waste products derived from agricultural by-products [12] and the
wood industry, as well as non-conventional waste items from municipal and industrial

operations. The use of waste materials in the manufacturing of activated carbon may
be of significant benefit in minimizing waste disposal in the environment, which may
have further impacts. Activated carbon may be produced by using waste materials.
When using TiO2, one of the most important obstacles that must be overcome is
separating the powder catalyst from the effluent at high concentrations, which might
result in the coagulation of the catalyst as well as the creation of aggregates [13].
Activated carbon's high porosity, high surface area, high photostability, and
appropriateness for use at room temperature are some of the benefits that accrue from


using TiO2 in conjunction with activated carbon. Other advantages include the ease
with which the catalyst can be extracted from the bulk solution. Other materials than
activated carbon, such as clays [14], zeolite [15], silica [18], alumina [16], and glass,
were used in an attempt to boost the photocatalytic efficacy of the catalyst; however,
these other materials did not make a significant contribution. It's possible that the
synergistic effect of activated carbon and TiO 2 is what's responsible for the promising
nature of the combo. Sometimes the reaction between TiO2 and a specific pollutant can
result in coagulation, which will prevent a significant amount of UV or solar radiation
from reaching the catalyst's active core. This can happen in a number of different
ways. This resulted in the reduction in the surface area of the catalyst, which in turn
led in a decrease in its photocatalytic activity [17]. Because the activated carbon at the
surface of the TiO2 functions as an efficient adsorption trap for the organic pollutant,
this results in the mass transfer of the pollutant to the surface of the catalyst, which is
where the photoreaction takes place. It has been shown that the higher adsorption of
the substrate onto the surface of the carbon in activated carbon contributes to the
enhanced photocatalytic elimination of pollutants [19,20]. This effect is attributed to
activated carbon.
In order to broaden the absorption spectrum of the TiO 2 catalyst to include the
visible light area, which accounts for about 45 percent of solar energy, it is necessary
to incorporate metal or nonmetallic alteration methods into the structure of the TiO 2

material. Since solar energy is a renewable and endless source of energy, this step is
necessary because it is required to broaden the absorption spectrum of the TiO2
catalyst.
Recently, a number of researchers have begun using graphene oxide in an effort
to enhance the performance of TiO2 photocatalysts. This is owing to the multiple
advantages that graphene oxide offers in terms of enhancing catalytic performance under
circumstances of visible light. [21-25]
2. Objectives of the study
The general objective of this study is to produce catalysts TiO 2 modified with
activated carbon and graphene oxide, coated on various materials to degrade organic
pollutants in wastewater, which is represented by methyl orange and phenol as two


harmful substances popular in many textile and other industrial factories, at Vietnam
and in the world.


The other aims are to investigate the process parameter in catalyst synthesis, to
find out the optimum catalysts of each synthesis methods, to make the thin films of
catalyst on various substrates to degrade methyl orange, to modify catalyst to have
positive results in full range light condition.
3. Content of the thesis
Firstly, literature review on previous studies will be investigated to select the
preparation methods of the catalysts, materials to modify catalyst, coating techniques
and model pollutants to conduct research
The photocatalyst TiO2 was synthesized by sol-gel, co-precipitation and
hydrothermal methods. After that, catalysts were modified with activated carbon and
graphene oxide, silica gel then the catalysts were characterized by physical adsorption,
SEM, XRD, UV-Vis.
The catalytic activities of these catalysts were conducted for methyl orange and

phenol, one stable organic compound, in UV-C and full range light condition.
The main process parameters in phenol photodegradation of the optimum
catalysts were evaluated and do kinetics study this process.
4. Methodologies of the study
Literature review: it is a general section to collect related data from previous
researches such as the catalyst composites with activated carbon and graphene oxide,
the

preparation

methods,

coating

methods,

methyl

orange

and

phenol

photodegradation.
Experiments: the catalysts were prepared by sol-gel, co-precipitation, and
hydrothermal methods, then characterized by various techniques such as BET physical
adsorption, SEM, XRD. Finally, the photodegradation performances of these catalysts
were evaluated using specific reactor systems combined with UV-Vis and HPLC
methods.

Data analysis and processing: the method is used to gather and determine the
concentration of methyl orange and phenol based on the calibration curve of these
substances.
5. Scope of the study


Organic pollutants: Methyl orange and phenol were chosen to evaluate the
catalyst performance since they are popular pollutants in wastewater.


Catalyst thin films: Catalyst thin films made by dip coating and CVD methods on
various substrates as cordierite, glass and aluminum are studied.
6. Scientific and practical meanings
The thesis can provide a scientific background to synthesize the photocatalyst
TiO2 in methyl orange and phenol in laboratory condition. Since methyl orange and
phenol are popular and difficult compounds to be degraded with aromatic compound, a
catalyst with positive efficiency to degrade them will be certainly possible to
photodegrade other pollutants.
The catalysts were synthesized in thin films by dip coating and CVD methods.
The parameters and method in making thin films were investigated which can further
apply to treat industrial wastewater.
7. Novelty of the study
The main innovations of this research include:
1. Process parameter optimization for catalysts synthesized via co-precipitation,
hydrothermal, and sol-gel methods.
2. Catalytic film formation optimization on various substrates using CVD (chemical
vapor deposition) and dip coating.
3. Research on the modification of catalysts synthesized by sol-gel and hydrothermal
methods on activated carbon and graphene oxide carriers appliedd in the treatment of
methyl orange and phenol.

8.Structure of the thesis
The thesis consists of four main chapters. The first chapter summarizes the
literature on methyl orange (MO) and phenol contamination, and the methods for
preparing titanium dioxide (TiO2) to improve its performance in the photocatalytic
degradation of MO and phenol. The second chapter describes the synthesis method to
prepare the various catalysts, introduce basic principles of the physico-chemical
methods used as well as the experimental set-up utilized in the thesis. The third chapter
focuses on evaluating the properties of the prepared catalysts, and the influence of
different synthesis methods on the catalytic performance of the catalysts in the
photodegradation of methyl orange and methyl orange phenol.
Finally, the fourth chapter summarizes the main points of the thesis and gives
some recommendations for future works.


CHAPTER 1. LITERATURE REVIEW
This chapter presents the previous research that are related to this study as TiO 2
catalyst, preparation method of photocatalyst, photodegradation for MO and phenol,
TiO2/AC and TiO2/GO materials, coating techniques ... et al.
1.1. Textile industry and Methyl Orange dye
The textiles and garment industry of Vietnam has been a critical area for the
Vietnamese economy for a long time. The industry employs over 3 million employees
and has over 7,000 factories throughout the country. As a sector relies heavily on water
supply for its development and produces wastewater as a result, it is crucial for
stakeholders in the sector to better understand the water threats they pose, their
impacts and the possible approaches they provide to these challenges [26].
In the textile and dye business, wastewater is produced throughout the steps of
sizing, cooking, bleaching, dying, and finishing. These processes may be broken down
into their individual stages here. The quantity of wastewater produced is mostly
attributable to the washing procedure that occurs after each cycle. The amount of water
that is required in a textile industry is quite high, although the amount varies greatly

from item to item. The examination of specialists indicates that the quantity of water
used in the manufacturing stages amounts for 72.3% of the total, with the majority of
this water coming from the dyeing and finishing stages of the goods. One may do a
rough calculation that places the water need for one meter of fabric anywhere in the
range of 12–65 liters and the amount of water discharged somewhere between 10–40
liters. Water contamination is the most significant environmental issue that the textile
sector faces. The textile dyeing business is regarded to be the most polluting of all
industries when two parameters, namely the volume of wastewater and the types of
pollutants that are included within the wastewater, are taken into consideration.[27,28].
The primary contaminants in textile dyeing wastewater include persistent organic
chemicals, dyes, surfactants, organic halogen compounds, neutral salts that enhance
the total solids content, and temperature. Due to the high alkalinity, the effluent pH is
also high. Among these, dyes are the most complex to process, particularly azo dyes,
which account for 60-70 percent of the dye industry [29-32]. During the dyeing
process, the pigments in the dyes do not normally attach themselves to the fibers of the
cloth; nonetheless, a certain quantity of the pigments still stays in the wastewater.
There may


be as much as fifty percent of the original quantity of color left in the material after it
has been dyed [29-30]. Because of this, the wastewater that is produced from the
textile dyeing process has a strong color and a significant concentration of
contaminants.
Methyl orange, often known as MO, is an anionic azo dye that has found
widespread use in a variety of different sectors, including those dealing with textiles,
printing, paper, pharmaceuticals, food, photography, and leather. Methyl orange and
the various compounds that come from it are responsible for significant amounts of
pollution that are released into the environment. It has been shown that this coloring
agent may cause cancer as well as genetic mutations [33]. In addition to being a dye
that is soluble in water, methyl orange is characterized by a high degree of stability as

well as unique color qualities. This compound has an orange appearance when it is in a
basic medium, but it has a red appearance when it is in an acidic media. It was
discovered that the reductive breakage of the azo bond (–N=N–) by the azo reductase
enzyme that is present in liver creates aromatic amines, and that these aromatic amines
may potentially contribute to intestinal cancer if they are taken by human humans [34].

Fig. 1.1: Chemical structure of MO molecule [33,34]
Methyl orange, also known as (C14H14N3SO3Na), served as the model pollutant
for the purpose of this investigation. Methyl Orange is a typical kind of azo-dye that is
used in the industrial sector. It is prized for the stability that it has. Up to 70% of
today's dyes are made up of azo-compounds, which are synthetic inorganic chemical
chemicals. These compounds are used to make colors. It is believed that somewhere
between 10 and 15 percent of the dye that is used in the production of textiles is
wasted and emitted as effluent. The discharge of this effluent is referred to as "nonaesthetic pollution" since the concentrations that are visible in water sources are lower
than 1 parts per million. Although this is the major reason for degrading methyl
orange, the dye waste water may also create harmful byproducts through other
chemical processes such as oxidation and hydrolysis [35-37]. Although this is the


primary motive for degrading methyl orange, it is not the only motivation. These
azo-compounds are quite stable, as was previously


said, and this is because the dye contains a significant amount of aromatics. Biological
treatments may not be able to degrade the dye effluents; instead, they could only
change the color of the effluents.
1.2. Phenol in industry and its impact to the health
The chemical compound known as phenol (C 6H6OH) was found for the first
time in 1834 during the distillation of coal. It was first referred to as a carbolic acid
since coal distillation was the primary source of phenol synthesis up to the advent of

the petrochemical industry. At the moment, quite a few different chemical processes
have been discovered that may be used to generate phenol. In particular, a large
number of steel plants discharge wastewater that contains phenol chemicals. Pure
phenol is either colorless or white in appearance. In this state, phenols are solid
crystals that may persist in air for an extended period of time. Partial oxidation of
phenol causes the material to take on a pink hue and causes it to break down when it
comes into contact with water vapor. The concentration of phenol at which an odor can
be detected begins at 0.04 ppm; at this level, the phenol has an odor that may be
described as mildly pungent and pungent. Phenol plays a very important part in
industry; it is the raw material that many factories use to produce plastics, chemical silk,
agricultural pharmaceuticals, antiseptics, fungicides, pharmaceuticals, dyes, and
explosives [38,39]. In addition, phenol is the source material for many other industries
that produce plastics.
Phenol may enter the human body by inhalation as well as through contact with
the skin, eyes, and mucous membranes. When ingested, substances with a high phenol
content will lead to a fatal phenomenon with symptoms such as convulsions, inability
to control, coma leads to respiratory disorders, blood changes in the body leading to a
drop in blood pressure. Phenol is considered to be extremely toxic to humans when it
enters the body of a human through the mouth. When a person is poisoned by phenol,
it first affects their liver, and then it goes on to attack their heart. When individuals
were subjected to phenol for extended periods of time in a number of different trials, it
was found that they experienced pain in their muscles and an enlargement of their
livers. Burns to the skin and irregular heartbeats are also side effects of phenol's
contact with the skin. The amount of phenol that may legally be present in a human
body is capped at 0.6 milligrams per kilogram of total body weight. There are no
studies on the effect of phenol at low concentrations on the development of the body at
this time; however, many scientists believe that chronic exposure to phenol can lead to


growth retardation, cause abnormal changes in the next generation, and increase the

rate of premature birth