MINISTRY OF EDUCATION & TRAINING
MINISTRY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE
MILITARY TECHNICAL ACADEMY
LE THI THANH HUYEN
REPEATED INDEX MODULATION
FOR OFDM SYSTEMS
A Thesis for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
HA NOI - 2020
luan an
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION & TRAINING
MINISTRY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE
MILITARY TECHNICAL ACADEMY
LE THI THANH HUYEN
REPEATED INDEX MODULATION
FOR OFDM SYSTEMS
A Thesis for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
Specialization: Electronic Engineering
Specialization code: 9 52 02 03
SUPERVISOR
Prof. TRAN XUAN NAM
HA NOI - 2020
luan an
ASSURANCE
I hereby declare that this thesis was carried out by myself under the
guidance of my supervisor. The presented results and data in the thesis are reliable and have not been published anywhere in the form of
books, monographs or articles. The references in the thesis are cited in
accordance with the university’s regulations.
Hanoi, May 17th, 2019
Author
Le Thi Thanh Huyen
luan an
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
It is a pleasure to take this opportunity to send my very great appreciation to those who made this thesis possible with their supports.
First, I would like to express my deep gratitude to my supervisor,
Prof. Tran Xuan Nam, for his guidance, encouragement and meaningful
critiques during my researching process. This thesis would not have been
completed without him.
My special thanks are sent to my lecturers in Faculty of Radio - Electronics, especially my lecturers and colleagues in Department of Communications who share a variety of difficulties for me to have more time
to concentrate on researching. I also would like to sincerely thank my
research group for sharing their knowledge and valuable assistance.
Finally, my gratitude is for my family members who support my studies with strong encouragement and sympathy. Especially, my deepest
love is for my mother and two little sons who always are my endless
inspiration and motivation for me to overcome all obstacles.
Author
Le Thi Thanh Huyen
luan an
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
List of abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
iv
List of figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
vii
List of tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
x
List of symbols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
xi
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1
Chapter 1. RESEARCH BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8
1.1. Basic principle of IM-OFDM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8
1.1.1. IM-OFDM model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9
1.1.2. Sub-carrier mapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12
1.1.3. IM-OFDM signal detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
14
1.1.4. Advantages and disadvantages of IM-OFDM . . . . . . . . . . . .
16
1.2. Related works . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
17
1.3. Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
23
Chapter 2. REPEATED INDEX MODULATION FOR OFDM
WITH DIVERSITY RECEPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
24
2.1. RIM-OFDM with diversity reception model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
24
2.2. Performance analysis of RIM-OFDM-MRC/SC under perfect CSI
28
2.2.1. Performance analysis for RIM-OFDM-MRC . . . . . . . . . . . .
i
luan an
29
2.2.2. Performance analysis for RIM-OFDM-SC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
34
2.3. Performance analysis of RIM-OFDM-MRC/SC under imperfect
CSI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
35
2.3.1. Performance analysis for RIM-OFDM-MRC . . . . . . . . . . . .
35
2.3.2. Performance analysis for RIM-OFDM-SC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
40
2.4. Performance evaluation and discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
41
2.4.1. Performance evaluation under perfect CSI . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
41
2.4.2. SEP performance evaluation under imperfect CSI condition .
48
2.4.3. Comparison of the computational complexity . . . . . . . . . . .
49
2.5. Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
50
Chapter 3. REPEATED INDEX MODULATION FOR OFDM
WITH COORDINATE INTERLEAVING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
51
3.1. RIM-OFDM-CI system model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
51
3.2. Performance analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
56
3.2.1. Symbol error probability derivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
56
3.2.2. Asymptotic analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
59
3.2.3. Optimization of rotation angle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
60
3.3. Low-complexity detectors for RIM-OFDM-CI. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
62
3.3.1. Low-complexity ML detector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
62
3.3.2. LLR detector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
65
3.3.3. GD detector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
66
3.4. Complexity Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
67
3.5. Performance evaluations and discussion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
69
ii
luan an
3.6. Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
75
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
76
PUBLICATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
79
BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
81
iii
luan an
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
Abbreviation
Definition
AWGN
Additive White Gaussian Noise
BEP
Bit Error Probability
BER
Bit Error Rate
CI
Coordinate Interleaving
CS
Compressed Sensing
CSI
Channel State Information
D2D
Device to Device
ESIM-OFDM
Enhanced Sub-carrier Index Modulation for Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing
FBMC
Filter Bank Multi-Carrier
FFT
Fast Fourier Transform
GD
Greedy Detection
ICI
Inter-Channel Interference
IEP
Index Error Probability
IFFT
Inverse Fast Fourier Transform
IM
Index Modulation
IM-OFDM
Index Modulation for OFDM
iv
luan an
IM-OFDM-CI
Index Modulation for OFDM with Coordinate
Interleaving
IoT
Internet of Things
ISI
Inter-Symbol Interference
ITU
International Telecommunications Union
LowML
Low-complexity Maximum Likelihood
LLR
Log Likelihood Ratio
LUT
Look-up Table
M2M
Machine to Machine
Mbps
Megabit per second
MGF
Moment Generating Function
MIMO
Multiple Input Multiple Output
ML
Maximum Likelihood
MM-IM-OFDM
Multi-Mode IM-OFDM
MRC
Maximal Ratio Combining
NOMA
Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access
OFDM
Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing
OFDM-GIM
OFDM with Generalized IM
OFDM-I/Q-IM
OFDM with In-phase and Quadrature Index
Modulation
OFDM-SS
OFDM Spread Spectrum
PAPR
Peak-to-Average Power Ratio
PEP
Pairwise Error Probability
PIEP
Pairwise Index Error Probability
v
luan an
PSK
Phase Shift Keying
QAM
Quadrature Amplitude Modulation
RIM-OFDM
Repeated Index Modulation for OFDM
RIM-OFDM-MRC
Repeated Index Modulation for OFDM with
Maximal Ratio Combining
RIM-OFDM-SC
Repeated Index Modulation for OFDM with Selection Combining
RIM-OFDM-CI
Repeated Index Modulation for OFDM with Coordinate Interleaving
SC
Selection Combining
SEP
Symbol Error Probability
SIMO
Single Input Multiple Output
S-IM-OFDM
Spread IM-OFDM
SNR
Signal to Noise Ratio
SM
Spatial Modulation
SS
Spread Spectrum
UWA
Underwater Acoustic
V2V
Vehicle to Vehicle
V2X
Vehicle to Everything
xG
x-th Generation
vi
luan an
LIST OF FIGURES
1.1
Block diagram of an IM-OFDM system. . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2.1
Structure of the RIM-OFDM-MRC/SC transceiver. . . . . . 25
2.2
The SEP comparison between RIM-OFDM-MRC and the
conventional IM-OFDM-MRC system when N = 4, K =
2, L = 2, M = {4, 8}. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
2.3
The SEP performance of RIM-OFDM-SC in comparison
with IM-OFDM-SC for N = 4, K = 2, L = 2, M = {4, 8}. . 43
2.4
The relationship between the index error probability of
RIM-OFDM-MRC/SC and the modulation order M in
comparison with IM-OFDM-MRC/SC for N = 4, K = 2,
M = {2, 4, 8, 16}. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
2.5
The impact of L on the SEP performance of RIM-OFDMMRC and RIM-OFDM-SC for M = 4, N = 4, K = 2 and
L = {1, 2, 4, 6}. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
2.6
The SEP performance of RIM-OFDM-MRC under influence of K for M = {2, 4, 8, 16}, N = {5, 8}, K = {2, 3, 4, 5}.
2.7
46
The SEP performance of RIM-OFDM-SC under influence
of K when M = {2, 4, 8, 16}, N = {5, 8}, K = {2, 3, 4, 5}. . . 46
2.8
Influence of modulation size on the SEP of RIM-OFDMMRC/SC for N = 5, K = 4, and M = {2, 4, 8, 16, 32}. . . . . 47
vii
luan an
2.9
The SEP performance of RIM-OFDM-MRC in comparison with IM-OFDM-MRC under imperfect CSI when N =
4, K = 2, M = {4, 8}, and ǫ2 = {0.01, 0.05}. . . . . . . . . . 48
2.10 The SEP performance of RIM-OFDM-SC in comparison
with IM-OFDM-SC under imperfect CSI when N = 4,
K = 2, M = {4, 8}, and ǫ2 = 0.01. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
3.1
Block diagram of a typical RIM-OFDM-CI sub-block. . . . . 52
3.2
Rotated signal constellation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
3.3
Computational complexity comparison of LLR, GD, ML
and lowML detectors when a) N = 8, M = 16, K =
{1, 2, . . . , 7} and b) N = 8, K = 4, M = {2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64}. . 68
3.4
Index error performance comparison of RIM-OFDM-CI,
IM-OFDM, IM-OFDM-CI and ReMO systems at the spectral efficiency (SE) of 1 bit/s/Hz, M = {2, 4}, N = 4,
K = {2, 3}. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
3.5
SEP performance comparison between RIM-OFDM-CI,
IM-OFDM and CI-IM-OFDM using ML detection at the
spectral efficiency of 1 bit/s/Hz when M = {2, 4}, N = 4,
K = {2, 3}. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
3.6
BER comparison between the proposed scheme and the
benchmark ones when N = 4, K = {2, 3}, M = {2, 4}. . . . 72
3.7
BER comparison between the proposed and benchmark
schemes at SE of 1.25 bits/s/Hz when N = {4, 8}, K =
{2, 4}, M = {2, 4, 8}. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
viii
luan an
3.8
SEP performance of RIM-OFDM-CI and benchmark systems using different detectors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
ix
luan an
LIST OF TABLES
1.1
An example of look-up table when N = 4, K = 2, p1 = 2 . . 13
2.1
Complexity comparison between the proposed schemes
and the benchmark. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
3.1
Example of LUT for N = 4, K = 2, pI = 2. . . . . . . . . . . 54
3.2
Complexity comparison between ML, LowML, LLR and
GD dectectors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
x
luan an
LIST OF SYMBOLS
Symbol
Meaning
a
A complex number
aR
Real part of a
aI
Imaginary part of a
|a|
Modulus of a
a
A vector
A
A matrix
AH
The Hermitian transpose of A
AT
The transpose of A
c
Number of possible combinations of active indices
f (.)
Probability density function
G
Number of sub-blocks
K
Number of active sub-carriers
N
Number of sub-carriers in each sub-block
NF
Number of sub-carriers in IM-OFDM system
L
Number of receive antennas
P (.)
The probability of an event
PI
Index symbol error probability
PM
M -ary modulated symbol error probability
xi
luan an
Ps
Symbol error probability
Q (.)
The tail probability of the standard Gaussian
distribution
γ¯
Average SNR at each sub-carrier
I
Set of possible active sub-carrier indices
M (.)
The moment generating function.
S
Complex signal constellation
Sφ
Rotated complex signal constellation
α
Index of an active sub-carrier
ǫ
Channel estimation error variance
Θ
Big-Theta notation
φ
Rotation angle of signal constellation
φopt
Optimal rotation angle of signal constellation
2
k.kF
Frobenius norm of a matrix
diag(.)
Diagonal matrix
C (N, K)
Binomial coefficient, C (N, K) =
⌊x⌋
Rounding down to the closest integer
log2 (.)
The base 2 logarithm
E {.}
Expectation operation.
xii
luan an
N!
K!(N −K)!
INTRODUCTION
Motivation
Wireless communication has been considered to be the fastest developing field of the communication industry. Through more than 30 years
of research and development, various generations of wireless communications have been born. The achievable data rate of wireless systems
has increased to several thousands of times higher (the fourth generation - 4G) than that of the second generation (2G) wireless systems.
Particularly, the 4G wireless communication systems, supported by key
technologies such as multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO), orthogonal
frequency division multiplexing (OFDM), cooperative communications,
have already achieved the data rate of hundreds Mbps [1].
The MIMO technique exploits the diversity of multiple transmit antennas and multiple receive antennas to enhance channel capacity without either increasing the transmit power or requiring more bandwidth.
Meanwhile, OFDM is known as an efficient multi-carrier transmission
technique which has high resistance to the multi-path fading.
The
OFDM system offers a variety of advantages such as inter-symbol interference (ISI) resistance, easy implementation by inverse fast Fourier
transform/fast Fourier transform (IFFT/FFT). It can also provide higher
spectral efficiency over the single carrier system since its orthogonal sub1
luan an
carriers overlap in the frequency domain.
Due to vast developments of smart terminals, new applications with
high-density usage, fast and continuous mobility such as cloud services,
machine-to-machine (M2M) communications, autonomous cars, smart
home, smart health care, Internet of Things (IoT), etc, the 5G system has promoted challenging researches in the wireless communication
community [2]. It is expected that ubiquitous communications between
anybody, anything at anytime with high data rate and transmission reliability, low latency are soon available [3]. Although there are several
5G trial systems installed worldwide, so far there have not been any
official standards released yet. The International Telecommunications
Union (ITU) has set 2020 as the deadline for the IMT-2020 standards.
According to a recent report of the ITU [3], 5G can provide data rate
significantly higher, about tens to hundreds of times faster than that of
4G. For latency issue, the response time to a request of 5G can reduce
to be about 1 millisecond compared to that around 120 milliseconds and
between roughly 15-60 milliseconds of 3G and 4G, respectively [3].
In order to achieve the above significant improvement, the 5G system
continues employing OFDM as one of the primary modulation technologies [2]. Meanwhile, based on OFDM, index modulation for OFDM
(IM-OFDM) has been proposed and emerged as a promising multicarrier transmission technique. IM-OFDM utilizes the indices of active
sub-carriers of OFDM systems to convey additional information bits.
There are several advantages over the conventional OFDM proved for
IM-OFDM such as the improved transmission reliability, energy effi2
luan an
ciency and the flexible trade-off between the error performance and the
spectral efficiency [4], [5]. However, in order to be accepted for possible
inclusion in the 5G standards and have a full understanding about the
IM-OFDM capability, more studies should be carried out.
Inspired by the motivation of OFDM in the framework of 5G and the
application potentials of IM-OFDM to the future commercial standards,
the present thesis has adopted IM-OFDM as the research theme for its
study with the title “Repeated index modulation for OFDM systems”.
Within the scope of the research topic, the thesis aims to conduct a
thorough study on the IM-OFDM system, and make its contributions to
enhance performances of this attractive system.
Research Objectives
Motivated by the application potentials of IM-OFDM and the fact
that its limitations, such as high computational complexity and limited
transmission reliability, which may prevent it from possible implementation, this research aims at proposing enhanced IM-OFDM systems to
tackle these problems. Moreover, a mathematical framework for the
performance analysis is also developed to evaluate the performance of
the proposed systems under various channel conditions. The specific
objectives of the thesis research can be summarized as follows:
• Upon studying the related IM-OFDM systems in the literature, efficient signal processing techniques such as repetition code and coordinate interleaving are proposed to employ in the considered systems.
• Efficient signal detectors for the IM-OFDM system, which can bal3
luan an
ance the error performance with computational complexity, are studied and proposed for the considered systems.
• Developing mathematical frameworks for performance analysis of
the proposed systems, which can give an insight into the system
behavior under the impacts of the system parameters.
Research areas
• Wireless communication systems under the impact of different fading conditions.
• Multi-carrier transmission using OFDM and index modulation.
• Detection theory and complexity analysis.
Research method
In this thesis, both the theoretical analysis and the Monte-Carlo simulation are used to evaluate the performance of the considered systems.
• The analytical methods are used for calculating the computational
complexity of the detection algorithms and to derive the closedform expressions for symbol error and bit error probabilities of the
proposed systems.
• The Monte-Carlo simulation is applied to validate the analytical
results and to make comparison between the performance of the
proposed systems and that of the benchmarks.
Thesis contribution
The major contributions of the thesis can be summarized as follows:
4
luan an