Assessing consumer awareness and usage of food labels and influences on food buying behavior

1
Symposium ID: 285


Assessing Consumer Awareness and Usage of Food Labels and
Influences on Food Buying Behavior

Sushil Kumar
1
Centre for Food and Agribusiness Management

Indian Institute of Management
Prabandh Nagar, Off Sitapur Road,
Lucknow - 226013, Uttar Pradesh (India)
Phone 91-522-2736987 (O) Fax 91-522-2734027/25
Email:


and

Jabir Ali
Indian Institute of Management
Prabandh Nagar, Off Sitapur Road,
Lucknow - 226013, Uttar Pradesh (India)
Phone 91-522-2736978 (O) Fax 91-522-2734027/25
Email:

1
Corresponding author: Email: Tel. +91 522 2736987; Fax: +91 522 2734027

Prepared for presentation at 21
st
Annual IFAMA World Forum and Symposium on the Road to
2050: Sustainability as a Business Opportunity, Frankfurt, Germany during June 20-23, 2011









2
Assessing Consumer Awareness and Usage of Food Labels and
Influences on Food Buying Behavior
Abstract
Food regulations and increased consumer awareness are forcing food companies across the world
to display more and more information on packaged food products. However, little is known about
consumer response to such information in emerging economies. Using data from a questionnaire
survey conducted among 373 respondents across three major cities in India, the study assesses the
level of awareness about five categories of information generally displayed on food labels. The

study also examines the usability of such information in purchase decisions of the respondents.
The level of awareness and the purchase decisions are compared across different socio-economic
groups. It is found that Indian consumers in these three cities are fairly aware of the information
provided on the food labels; though the level of awareness about different types of information
varies. The results indicate that particular category of information is used more by the consumers
while purchasing packaged food products. Differences across different socio-economic groups
are also significant in many cases. The results have very strong implications for regulatory
authorities as well as the food companies.
Keywords: Food labels; consumer awareness; buying behavior; India
Target Audience: Management scholars and management practitioners















3
Assessing Consumer Awareness and Usage of Food Labels and
Influences on Food Buying Behavior
Executive Summary
Information disclosure on food products is a critical aspect due largely to stringent

regulatory regimes and food companies spend hefty sums of money on making this
information available to the customers. In order for such information to get converted
into knowledge, consumers should be able to comprehend this information and make
informed choices while buying different food products. Present study tries to assess the
awareness of consumers about information provided on food labels, by undertaking a
survey among 373 consumers in three major cities in India. The study further tries to
examine whether consumers make use of such information in making purchase decisions.
It is found that consumers in India possess satisfactory level of awareness about different
types of information on the food labels displayed on packaged food products, however,
usage of such information as one of the criteria while purchasing packaged food product
is relatively low. They also have very strong preference for brand and the taste of the
product. This preference makes them purchase a packaged food item even though it may
not meet their criteria of healthy food or may contain some harmful ingredients. Hence, it
becomes very essential for authorities to keep a thorough check on food processing
companies as to what they put into in the market. At the same time big processing
companies with established brand names in the market, need to be very conscious of their
responsibility when introducing new products in the market. The results give a clear
indication that label information is generally gender and age insensitive though its use
assumes significance with the income levels, education and occupation of the consumers.
Most lifestyle products such as breakfast cereals, readymade dressings etc. that would
mostly be used by people who have relatively higher levels of income and education
would pay more attention to various kinds of label information.

4
Assessing Consumer Awareness and Usage of Food Labels and
Influences on Food Buying Behavior

Introduction
Food product labeling, as policy tool for ensuring provision of nutrition and health
information to consumers and as product differentiation strategy by food companies, has
gained importance in the recent past across the globe (Kim, Nayga and Capps, 2001;
Marks, 1984). Recent concerns with food safety (e.g., BSE and Biotechnology) have
resulted in increased demand for regulatory pressures directed at labeling the ingredients,
processing methods, and nutritional content of foods. Trend towards healthier and
wellness food has also led to consumer demand for “more detailed, accurate, and
accessible” nutritional information on the packaged food (Abbott, 1997). Consequently,
nation states across the globe have come out with legal regulations which require
mandatory nutrition labeling of packaged food products. The food labels act as a
signaling mechanism by which food companies assure their potential consumers
regarding their sound quality control practices. However, there are many issues and
questions related to food labeling. One such question that has been raised across
continents is how far the consumers are aware of food labels and can they comprehend
the information provided on the labels. Further, how far the aware consumers take into
consideration food label information while making purchase decisions?
These questions are very pertinent in today’s business environment when food companies
are coming under stringent regulatory pressures to disseminate correct and appropriate
information regarding food items. These labeling regulations essentially reflect response
to consumer’s right to know the content and nutrition of a particular food product. The
objective of these regulations is to provide consistent, understandable, and usable labels
that can help consumers make informed and healthier food choices (Nayga 1996). Most
legal regulations concerning food product labeling are conceived and implemented on the
basic premise that dissemination of information in greater quantities and details will

facilitate consumers in making better brand choice decisions (McCullough and Best,
1980). This basic premise is in turn based on the assumption that consumers are aware of
the information being provided on the product label. Further, policy interventions
regarding mandatory disclosure of food product information also assume that consumers
can comprehend and interpret the information on the food label. However, all these
assumptions have been questioned by various researchers (e.g., McCullough and Best,
1980).
In the context of emerging economies, very little is known regarding consumers’
expectations and their response to food label information (Wang et al., 2008). India, one
of the dominant emerging economies, is witnessing unprecedented boom in the organized
retail growth. Indian consumers are in the process of changing their consumption/buying
behavior especially with respect to food items. Consumption of processed and packaged
food items has grown tremendously in the recent past. Demand for healthy and wellness
food is also on rise. With the change in lifestyle and consumption pattern, food safety

5
standards are becoming important from public policy perspective
2
Compliance to any legal regulations, in this case mandatory food labeling, has a cost
attached to it, which either the food company has to bear leading to lowering of its cost
competitive advantage or it is passed on to the customer making the food product costlier.
The expenditure on labeling will be of use only if consumers are aware of and are able to
understand, comprehend and make their purchase decisions based partially on the
information given on the label.
as well as from food
companies’ perspective. For commercial interests, food safety and transparency in
dissemination of related information is a factor that contributes to brand equity when
marketing food products to consumers in India.
In order to maximize benefits from implementation of emerging policy tools in the field
of food product labeling and also voluntary disclosure on the part of food companies, it is

imperative to assess the level of awareness among Indian consumers towards such
information and how far the information influences their purchase decisions in the
marketplace. Policy makers and researchers have not paid adequate attention to this issue
in the context of Indian food market. Therefore, the present study proposes to fill this gap
by exploring level of awareness among Indian consumers regarding content and
nutritional information on food product labels. The study also attempts to examine
demographic and socio-economic differences with regard to awareness. The outcomes of
the study will help Indian policy makers and food companies to understand the
complexity of issues involved in food labeling and design strategies to maximize benefits
from resources spent on food labeling.
This paper is structured as follows. Section 2 provides basic premise of the study and
discusses the existing regulatory framework with regard to food labeling in India. Data
collection and analytical methodology is discussed in Section 3 followed by results and
their discussion in Section 4. Finally, we conclude with policy implications of the results
in Section 5.
Background
Food labels act as signaling mechanism by which consumers can get assurances on the
food quality standards. Information provided on food labels can influence buying
behavior of the consumers. Several studies have demonstrated a link between the use of
food labels and a dietary intake of the respondents. Kim et al. (2000), in comparing the
difference in nutrient intakes of consumers when they did and did not use food labels,
discovered that using food labels decreased the consumer’s percentage of total calories

2
In order to ensure provision of accurate and reliable information on content and nutrition of packaged
food, the regulations in the Indian context have focused more on voluntary disclosure of information on
food labels, but with the coming of the Food Safety Standards Act 2006, which is yet to be implemented,
the guidelines on labeling. As per these guidelines all packaged food products need to adhere to- that labels
borne by them shall not contain any statement, claim, design or device which is false or misleading about
the food products contained in that package or concerning the quantity or the nutritive value implying

medicinal or therapeutic claims or in relation to the place of origin of the said food products. Further, every
business operator shall ensure that the labeling and presentation of food, including shape, appearance or
packaging, the packing materials used, the manner in which they are arranged and the setting in which they
are displayed, and the information which is made available about them through whatever medium, does not
mislead consumers.

6
received from fat and saturated fat. A similar study that focused on the effect of the new
nutrition label established in 1994 found that in 1995 individuals who used the food label
most often were about 32% more likely to eat a diet low in fat than individuals who said
they only sometimes used the label (Finke, 2000). A study of Washington State residents
also found that, even when controlling for other influential variables, there was a
significant relationship between label use and decreased fat intake (Neuhouser et al.,
1999). Weaver and Finke (2003) model the effectiveness of the current nutrition label as
a means of reducing the proportion of calories from added sugars in diets among
respondents to the1994–96 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals. Results
show a significant relationship between frequent use of sugar information on the label
and reduced added sugar density, suggesting that labeling is effective as a means of
assisting consumers to moderate sugar consumption.
Many studies in the context of industrialized nations indicate significant demographic
and socio-economic differences with regard to consumer awareness and the use of
information provided on food labels (Food Marketing Institute, 1989; Bender and Derby,
1992; Wandel, 1997). For example, the study of Wandel (1995) shows that women, the
highly educated and those who are on special diets, tend to read the food labels to a
greater extent than others (c.f. Wandel, 1997). Many investigators have also found that
the interest in reading the food labels increases with age up to the mid-fifties, and
thereafter it declines. The typical food label reader is reported to be a middle-aged
woman with high education (Wandel, 1995). Similarly, an empirical study of Nayga
(1996) in the US shows that males are less likely to read labels; people with some college
education are more likely to read labels and use the information; people on special diets

have a higher probability of using food labels; consumers residing in metros are more
likely to use and read labels than those living in non-metros etc. Guthrie et al. (1995) in
their study on nutrition label report that 71% of main meal planners admit using the
nutrition labels at least “sometimes.” They further report that women were more likely
than men to read nutrition labels. Other characteristics which were found to have
relationship with label use included education, previous nutrition knowledge, and
concerns over food safety. Studies have also been done to evaluate the positive effect of
label use on consumers’ diets. The same study by Guthrie et al. (1995) showed that meal
planners who used food labels had diets lower in cholesterol and higher in Vitamin.
Sampling, Location and Data Collection
In order to collect data on people’s awareness and the attention they pay to different
categories of information displayed on food labels while making purchase of packaged
food items, a structured questionnaire survey was conducted across three major cities in
northern India: Lucknow, Delhi and Kanpur. The questionnaire consisted of statements
aimed to elicit different dimensions of respondent’s awareness about food labels and how
far he/she uses this information in choosing different brands of packaged food products.
Respondents views on following types of information provided on labels were collected:
• List of ingredients or contents of the food
• Short phrases about the food characteristics such as low fat, low cholesterol etc
• Nutrition panel giving information on proteins, vitamins, carbohydrates, calories
etc per serving

7
• Information about the size of serving
• Statements regarding health benefits from the food
The selected cities provided a convenient sampling location both in terms of number and
the variety of respondents. Delhi is the capital city of India in addition to being a
metropolitan. Lucknow and Kanpur too are mini metros. Respondents for the survey were
selected using convenient sampling technique. The survey was carried out in places
where there was some kind of food retail presence (both organized and unorganized) such

as in market places, near shopping malls etc. However, care was taken to ensure coverage
of different socio-economic and demographic groups of customers.
On the whole, 373 responses were collected: 36% from Kanpur, 35% from Delhi, and
remaining 29% from Lucknow.
Results and Discussion
Table 1 shows salient socio-demographic characteristics of the sample covered in the
survey.
Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics of the Sample
Socio-Demographics Percent
Gender


Male
64%

Female
36%
Frequency of purchasing Packaged Food


More than once a week
32%

Once a week
12%

Once a month
16%

Occasionally

40%
Age groups


18 to 25 years
13%

26-35 years
26%

36-45 years
22%

46-55 years
23%

55-65 years
11%

More than 65 years
05%
Annual income (INR)


Less than 1,00,000
14%

1,00,000 - 2,49,999
38%

2,50,000 - 4,99,999
35%

5,00,000 - 7,99,999
10%

8,00,000 and above
03%
Level of education


Up to high school
14%

Some college
10%

College graduate
32%

Masters degree and above
44%

8
Majority of the respondents (64%) were males. Of 373 respondents 32% buy packaged
food more than once a week, 12% at least once a week and other 16% once a month.
There were around 40% respondents who said that they purchased packaged food
occasionally. Sample covered almost all age groups: 18 to 25 years (13%); 26-35 years
(26%); 36-45 years (22%); 46-55 years (23%); 55-65 years (11%); and more than 65
years (5%). Around 38% had annual income between Rs. 1,00,000 and 2,49,999, 35%

between Rs. 2,50,000 and 4,99,999, and 10% between Rs. 5,00,000 and 7,99,999. Of the
remaining respondents 14% had an annual income which was below Rs 1,00,000 and 3%
whose annual income was above Rs. 8,00,000.
In the questionnaire survey, respondents were asked to assign the level of importance
they attach to each of the five categories of information generally displayed on the food
labels.

Table 2: Level of Importance Assigned to Various Categories of Information’s on Food
Labels of Packaged Foods
Very
Imp
Somew
hat Imp.
Undecided Somew
hat
Unimp.
Not
Imp. at
all
Can't
Say
List of ingredients or
contents of the food
240 (64) 95 (25) 8 (2) 6 (2) 16 (4) 8 (2)
Short phrases about the
food characteristics
115 (31) 135(36) 42(11) 40(11) 30(8) 11(3)
Nutrition panel giving
information on proteins,
vitamins etc

190(51) 135(36) 18(5) 11(3) 9(2) 9(2)
Information about size
of serving
134(36) 114(31) 46(12) 40(11) 26(7) 11(3)
Statements regarding
health benefits from the
food
164(44) 115(31) 25(7) 34(9) 22(6) 12(3)
Note: Figures in parenthesis denote percentages

Results presented in Table 2 indicate that the majority of respondents attach a lot of
importance to the kind of information on the food labels and the ones who give no
importance at all to the information are very few. Information about ‘ingredients’
contained in the processed food is considered very important by 64% of the respondents
across three cities, information about ‘nutritional content’ by 51%, and ‘statements’
regarding health benefits by 44%. Numbers of respondents who consider information
about ‘serving size’ and ‘short phrases’ about special food characteristics very important
are comparatively low i.e., 36% and 31%. The results indicate that the Indian consumers
surveyed in three cities assign very high importance to information about food

9
ingredients and nutritional contents of the food. However, as compared to these aspects
of food labels, information on serving size and short phrases has lower priority among
these consumers.
Literature on consumer behavior shows that consumers’ actual behavior is consistent
with their attitude or concerns. For example, in a national survey in the US, 50% of the
surveyed respondents said that they preferred to buy organically grown fresh fruit and
vegetables, yet only 25% admitted that they actually bought them on regular basis.

Table 3: Buying Behavior of the Respondents based on the Information Provided on

Food Labels
Never Rarely Sometimes Mostly Always Not
aware of
List of ingredients or
content of the food
15(4) 24(6) 52(14) 104(28) 170(46) 7(2)
Short phrases about the
food characteristics
29(8) 39(11) 83(22) 118(32) 90(24) 13(4)
Nutrition panel giving
information on proteins,
vitamins etc
13(4) 29(8) 66(18) 126(34) 128(34) 9(2)
Information about size
of serving
37(10) 59(16) 80(21) 93(25) 92(25) 9(2)
Statements regarding
health benefits from the
food
18(5) 45(12) 74(20) 107(29) 116(31) 11(3)
Note: Figures in parenthesis denote percentages

In order to examine consistency between respondents’ attitude and behavior, we asked
the respondents about their buying behavior with respect to processed/packaged food
items. The objective was to see how much attention the respondents actually pay to
various categories of information while purchasing processed/packaged food. The results
presented in Table-3 above show that of the respondents who perceive different kinds of
information available on the food label as important not many see or use that information
while purchasing. Though, on the whole, majority of the respondents do check such
information before buying food products. Majority of the people i.e. 46% always check

the list of ingredients in the food item they are purchasing while 34% always check
nutrition panel information. Of the five categories of information provided on food labels,
information about serving size and short phrases about the food characteristics once again
get least attention from the respondents (25% and 24% respectively).
Certain food products, based on the food label information, may not meet buyers’ criteria
of a healthy food. In order to measure the importance people attach to aspects other than
food label information while making purchases, the respondents were asked whether they
purchased the packaged even if it did not meet their criteria of a healthy food.

10
Table 4: Preference of Buyers for the Product Attributes in Case of Packaged Food even
if it doesn't conform to Healthy Food
Most
Imp.
1
2 3 4 5 Least
Imp.
6
Brand 36(42) 22(26) 13(15) 10(11) 5(6) 0
Price 9(11) 15(18) 26(31) 24(28) 8(9) 3(3)
Taste 32(37) 28(33) 17(20) 6(7) 3(3) 0
Your peers buy it 2(2) 10(12) 10(12) 16(19) 41(48) 6(7)
Availability 3(3) 11(13) 22(26) 26(30) 20(23) 4(5)
Any other 3(19) 0 1(6) 1(6) 0 11(69)
Note: Figures in parenthesis denote percentages

As is evident from the results presented in Table 4, brand of the food product plays the
most important role with 42% respondents admitting that this is the most important
attribute because of which they still buy the processed/packaged product even if it can not
be categorized as a healthy food product. Taste and price of the food product are other

attributes in order of importance assigned by the respondents. Peer pressure and
availability of such products are the least important reasons for buying them. These
results indicate that if consumers are very loyal to the brand and really like the taste of a
processed/packaged food product, they buy it in spite of its inferior healthy content.

Table 5: Preference of Buyers for the Product Attributes in Case of Packaged Food Even
if it Contains Harmful Ingredients

Most
Imp.
1
2 3 4 5
Least
Imp.

6
Brand
30(45)
17(26)
10(15)
4(6)
5(8)
0
Price
8(12)
10(12)
17(20)
24(28)
4(5)
2(2)

Taste
25(38)
25(38)
13(20)
1(1)
2(3)
0
Your peers buy it
1(1)
7(11)
4(5)
14(16)
35(41)
4(5)
Availability
1(1)
7(11)
18(27)
21(32)
17(26)
2(3)
Any other
1(11)
0
0
0
0
8(89)
Note: Figures in parenthesis denote percentages

Most packaged foods are reported to contain certain harmful ingredients such as trans-
fats, monosodium glutamate etc. Using one item on the questionnaire we tried to assess
the level of awareness about these harmful ingredients among our sample. In the data it
was found that 69% respondents are aware about harmful ingredients in processed
packaged food items. It is but natural to believe that these respondents would not be
buying foods containing such ingredients given the fact that most people look into the list

11
of ingredients while buying. But, a sizeable 18% still buy packaged food items even if
these contained harmful ingredients.

Using one question on the questionnaire we tried to explore the reasons and preferences
of attributes of the food product among these 18% respondents. In this case too
preference for brand, shown by 45% respondents and taste preference shown by 38% are
the most important reasons for respondents because of which they buy such food items
(Table 5). Price being an intermediate factor and availability and peers buying it are the
least important factors for such behavior.

Comparisons across Respondent Groups
Using chi-square statistic, we examined variation across various respondent groups with
regard to different aspects discussed above. This was done to look for any significant
relationships between attitude and behavior towards information displayed on food labels
and socio-economic characteristics of the respondents. Tables 5-7 provide results of this
analysis.
Next, we discuss these results one by one.
Table 6 gives results of comparison of importance attached by various groups of
respondents to different categories of information displayed on the food labels.
Note: Figures outside parenthesis denote chi-square value and in parenthesis
denote p-value.

The results indicate that male and female respondents do not differ significantly in terms
importance assigned to information regarding ingredients or content, nutritional
composition, and health benefits, displayed on food labels. However, male respondents
Table 6: Chi-Square values for comparison of importance assigned to food
label information across various respondent groups
Gender Age Education

Income Occupation
List of ingredients or
contents of the food
14.38
(0.16)
52.48
(0.01)
115.16
(0.00)
44.41
(0.01)
41.59
(0.02)
Short phrases about the
food characteristics
17.70
(0.06)
33.03
(0.32)
85.63
(0.00)
43.69
(0.01)

38.94
(0.04)
Nutrition panel giving
information on proteins,
vitamins etc
5.60
(0.85)
45.52
(0.04)
98.31
(0.00)
55.85
(0.00)
32.59
(0.14)
Information about size
of serving
22.33
(0.01)
39.59
(0.11)
72.94
(0.00)
64.68
(0.00)
59.49
(0.00)
Statements regarding
health benefits from the
food

3.40
(0.97)
28.17
(0.56)
115.90
(0.00)
27.72
(0.32)
33.38
(0.12)

12
differ significantly from their female counterparts when it comes to importance regarding
short phrases about food characteristics (chi-square=17.70, p=0.06) and information
about serving size (chi-square=22.33, p=0.01). In comparison to females, male
respondents attach relatively higher importance to short phrases whereas females give
relatively higher importance to serving size.
Across different age groups of respondents, importance attached to the list of ingredients
and nutrition panel information varies significantly. Respondents in the age group of 26-
55 years attach significantly higher importance to both types of information displayed on
food labels, information related to the list of ingredients and nutrition panel.
Level of importance attached to all five categories of information on food label differs
significantly across five educational groups of the respondents. Respondents with higher
education attached significantly higher importance to all five categories of information
displayed on the food labels. Thus, highly significant value of chi-square statistic indicate
that there is significant correlation between education and the importance people attach to
the information displayed on food labels. This intuitive result implies that there is a need
of segmenting customers in packaged food markets based on their educational level.
Similarly, importance attached to all categories of information on food labels, except
statements regarding health benefits, varies significantly across different income groups

of respondents (Table 6). This indicates that as income levels of people rise they start
attaching increased importance to the information about various aspects of the food.
Information regarding list of ingredients, short phrases about food characteristics and size
of serving showed a significant relationship with respect to occupation of respondents.
For list of ingredients all occupation groups varying from government service, corporate
service, own business, farming, teaching all showed a high percentage towards its
importance. Whereas, for the other two variables people in services (both government
and corporate) and teaching gave more importance as compared to others.
As seen above there are certain significant relationship across demographic characteristic
of the respondents, but are these relationships still significant when people actually buy
packaged food? In order to answer this, significance of the same variables was examined
with respect to all the demographic variables when people actually buy the packaged
food.
Examining the attention paid by different respondent groups to various categories of
information on food label while purchasing packaged food items, we find that attention
paid to all types of information except the size of serving is invariant across male and
female respondents. Results presented in Table-7 indicate that both male and female
respondents pay equal attention to all aspects of information displayed on the food labels
while making purchases of processed/packaged food items. However, in the case of
serving size information, females differ significantly from males in terms the attention it
gets while purchasing a processed/ packaged food item.
Comparison across age groups indicates that behavior is invariant across age groups for
categories of information and significantly varies for the other two categories.
Respondents less than 25 years of age pay significantly less attention to list of ingredients
and short phrases while purchasing processed/packaged food items.

13
Table 7: Comparison of Buying Behavior of the Respondents based on the Information
Provided on Food Labels across Various Respondent Groups

Gender
Age
Educatio
n
Income
Occupati
on
List of ingredients or
content of the food
12.78
(0.24)
62.26
(0.00)
282.42
(0.00)
67.74
(0.00)
57.04
(0.00)
Short phrases about the
food characteristics
10.29
(0.42)
46.81
(0.03)
186.97
(0.00)
42.55
(0.02)
59.92

(0.00)
Nutrition panel giving
information on
proteins, vitamins etc
13.90
(0.18)
24.82
(0.73)
257.74
(0.00)
50.20
(0.00)
79.93
(0.00)
Information about size
of serving
23.39
(0.01)
35.86
(0.21)
221.84
(0.00)
71.53
(0.00)
60.94
(0.00)
Statements regarding
health benefits from the
food
11.78

(0.30)
40.78
(0.91)
208.16
(0.00)
45.62
(0.01)
60.58
(0.00)
Note: Figures outside parenthesis denote chi-square value and in parenthesis denote p-
value.

Across education, income and occupation classes, behavior of respondents at the time of
purchase is found to be significant different for categories of information displayed on
food labels (Table 7). People with graduate, postgraduate or doctorate degrees pay
significantly greater attention to the various kinds of information on the food labels while
purchasing processed/packaged food item as compared to respondents who were not that
highly educated. Hence, education seems to be a significant factor when looking for food
label information while buying packaged food.
Significant relationship between income of the respondents and the attention they pay to
all categories of information displayed on food labels indicates that as the income levels
rise people start paying increased attention to these kinds of information. Similarly, the
respondents serving in the government or private sector or doing their own business or in
teaching showed a high level of significance for label information while buying vis-à-vis
other professions like farming for instance.
These findings have implications on the food industry and retailers who target an urban
and educated clientele. The results indicate that people employed in urban areas with
generally a decent level of education gave much importance to food label information.

Finally, we also tested for the influence of different socio-economic characteristics of the

respondents on their level of awareness regarding harmful ingredients in packaged food
such as trans-fats, MSG etc. As shown in Table 8, we found that level of awareness is
invariant across gender and age and significantly varies across education, income and
occupation groups. Contrary to what one might think that females and homemakers
would have a higher chance of knowing these, it turned out that gender and age does not
have any significance at all. As expected, respondents with educational qualification
graduation and above have significantly greater awareness regarding such ingredients.

14
Similarly, people in the higher income brackets are significantly more aware of the
harmful contents in the processed/ packaged food items. Of all the occupational
categories, farmer was the one category where the awareness was nil.

Table 8: Comparison for Awareness about Harmful Ingredients and Buying Behavior
across Various Respondent Groups

Gender
Age
Education
Income
Occupation
Are you aware of
harmful ingredients in
packaged foods
2.50
(0.29)
7.35
(0.29)
75.43
(0.00)

42.51
(0.00)
30.64
(0.00)
Do you still buy the
same brand of the
product
15.65
(0.00)
13.21
(0.35)
91.19
(0.00)
23.35
(0.01)
61.92
(0.00)
Note: Figures outside parenthesis denote chi-square value and in parenthesis denote p-
value.

It would be expected that people who are aware of the harmful ingredients would not buy
food containing these ingredients. However, as mentioned before, some people still do.
We try to examine as to which demographic variables have a significant role to play in
such purchase decision making.
The results in Table 8 show that females, in comparison to males, are less likely to buy a
food product if these contained harmful ingredients. Taking into account that females
comprise at least half the packaged food clientele and probably a higher percentage of
household shoppers, it is important to take into account their buying behavior regarding
foods containing harmful ingredients. The use of such ingredients can be based on the
segmentation of the consumers.

Policy Implications and Conclusions
Consumer demand for detailed information regarding content and nutrition of packaged
food products is likely to increase due to booming organized retail sector in India. Based
on a structured questionnaire survey among 373 respondents spread across three major
cities in India the study tries to understand the existing level of consumer awareness
regarding information on food labels and the usage of such information in purchase
decisions about packaged food. The results indicate satisfactory level of awareness about
different types of information on the food labels displayed on packaged food products,
however, usage of such information as one of the criteria while purchasing packaged food
product is relatively low. The results indicate that Indian consumers assign very high
importance to information about food ingredients and nutritional contents of the food.
However, as compared to these aspects of food labels, information on serving size and
short phrases has lower priority among these consumers. They also have very strong
preference for brand and the taste of the product. This preference makes them purchase a
packaged food item even though it may not meet their criteria of healthy food or may

15
contain some harmful ingredients. Such high preference for brand and taste has far
reaching implications for both the regulatory authorities and the food processing firms. It
becomes very essential for authorities to keep a thorough check on food processing
companies as to what they put into in the market for some might knowing or
unknowingly use harmful ingredients and still get away with it because of a strong brand
name. Also, since all harmful ingredients are not banned or their use prohibited but they
can be used with certain riders (for example, foods containing MSG have warnings of not
using them for infants) it becomes all the more important as to how regulations are
framed to check these and how strictly they are enforced. The quantity of all ingredients
based on serving size also is essential while determining the healthy quotient of a food.
Hence, it is the responsibility of the regulatory agencies to spread awareness amongst
consumers regarding the importance of serving size.

At the same time big processing companies with established brand names in the market,
need to be very conscious of their responsibility when introducing new products in the
market. They need to live up to the trust of their consumers who, for the sake of brand
and taste, are willing to sacrifice a few health quotients.
The results give a clear indication that label information is generally gender and age
insensitive though its use assumes significance with the income levels, education and
occupation of the consumers. Most lifestyle products such as breakfast cereals,
readymade dressings etc. that would mostly be used by people who have relatively higher
levels of income and education would pay more attention to various kinds of label
information.
The awareness regarding label information is dependent on the consumer’s level of
education, income and kind of occupation. Hence, it becomes the task of regulatory
agencies to sensitize the consumers to availability and importance of such information.
Just enforcing rules on the food processing/packaging companies is not sufficient until
the buyer is not reading them let alone interpreting them.
To conclude, the outcomes of the study reveal level of awareness about food labels and
their usability among Indian consumers of packaged food products. These outcomes are
helpful for policy makers as well as food companies in designing appropriate strategies
for improving awareness among consumers and ensuring that their usability is improved.
The outcomes also help the food companies in deciding which type of information on the
food labels matters the most to the aware consumers in making rational food choices







16
References

Abbott R., 1997 Food and Nutrition Information: A Study of Sources, Uses, and
Understanding. British Food Journal, 99(2): 42-44
Bender M.M., and Derby B.M., 1992. Prevalence of reading nutrition and ingredient
information on food labels among adult Americans: 1982-1988. Journal of
Nutrition Education, 24(6): 292-297.
Finke, M.S., 2000. Did the nutrition labeling and education act affect food choice in the
United States? Proceeding of the American Consumer and the Changing Structure
of the Food System, Washington D.C.
Food Marketing Institute,1989, Trends, Washington, DC.
Guthrie, J.F., Fox, J.J., Cleveland, L.E., Welsh, S., 1995. Who uses nutrition labeling, and
what effects does label use have on diet quality? Journal of Nutrition Education,
27 (4), 163–172.
Huffman W.E., 2003. Consumer’s Acceptance of (and Resistance to) Genetically
Modified Foods in High-Income Countries: Effects of Labels and Information in
an Uncertain Environment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(5):
1112-1118
Kim S.Y., Nayga R.M. Jr., and Capps O. Jr., 2001. Food Label Use, Self-Selectivity, and
Diet Quality. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(2): 346-348
Kim S.Y., Nayga R.M. Jr., and Capps O. Jr., 2000. The Effect of Food Label Use on
Nutrient Intakes: An Endogenous Switching Regression Analysis. Journal of
Agriculture and Resource Economics, 25(1): 215-231
Marks, L., 1984. What's in a Label? : Consumers, Public Policy and Food Labels. Food
Policy, 9(3): 252-258
Mc Cullough J., and Best, R., 1980. Consumer Preferences for Food label Information: A
Basis for Segmentation. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 14(1): 180-182
Nayga R.M. Jr., 2000. Nutrition Knowledge, Gender, and Food Label Use. Journal of
Consumer Affairs, 34(1): 97-98
Neuhouser, M.L., Kristal, A.R., and Patterson, R.E., 1999. Use of food nutrition labels is
associated with lower fat intake. Journal of the American Dietetic Association,
99(1), 45–53.

Sahni H.S., 2007. The Indian Label Market- Current update and future developments:
India label Summit, 7th March 2007
The Food Safety and Standards Bill, 2005, as introduced in the Indian Parliament
Wandel M., 1997. Food Labeling from a Consumer Perspective. British Food Journal,
99(6): 212-214.
Wang, Z., Mao, Y., and Gale, F., 2008. Chinese consumer demand for food safety
attributes in milk products. Food Policy, 33(1): 27-36

17
Weaver, D., and Finke, M., 2003. The relationship between the use of sugar content
information on nutrition labels and the consumption of added sugars. Food
Policy, 8 (3): 213-219.