Tải bản đầy đủ (.pdf) (7 trang)

photocatalysis of two-dimensional honeycomb-like zno nanowalls on

Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (1.82 MB, 7 trang )

Photocatalysis of two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls on
zeolite
Zhichao Liu
a
, Zhifeng Liu
a,

, Ting Cui
a
, Junwei Li
a
, Jing Zhang
a
, Tao Chen
a
, Xingchen Wang
a
,
Xiaoping Liang
b
a
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, 300384 Tianjin, China
b
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin Polytechnic University, 300387 Tianjin, China
highlights
 ZnO nanowalls were supported on
synthetic zeolite from fly ash.
 ZnO nanowalls/zeolite prepared by
sol–gel and hydrothermal synthesis
method.
 Degradation of methylene blue in


water can reach 90% after 30 min.
graphical abstract
article info
Article history:
Received 31 May 2013
Received in revised form 22 August 2013
Accepted 4 September 2013
Available online 20 September 2013
Keywords:
Photocatalysis
Two-dimension
ZnO nanowalls
Zeolite
Fly ash
Wastewater treatment
abstract
Recent years have seen a series of new materials and technologies in wastewater treatment. Among var-
ious materials and technologies, the preparation and application of composite photocatalytic materials
has received significant attention. We focus on ZnO/zeolite composite photocatalysts because of their
superiority in wastewater treatment. Two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls were fabricated
on porous material of zeolite synthesized from fly ash by simple sol–gel and hydrothermal synthesis
method in order to maximize the specific surface area and photocatalytic performance as well as easy
to separation or recovery. The degradation of methylene blue dye in water can rapidly reach 90% with
two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls on zeolite composite materials after 30 min under
UV light irradiation, which implies its huge potential application of photocatalysts in wastewater
treatment.
Ó 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
In recent years, the world is facing water crisis due to lacking of
clean drinking water. With the fast development of various indus-

tries, a huge quantity of wastewater has been produced from
industrial processes and was discharged into soils and water sys-
tems. Wastewater usually contains many pollutants such as cat-
ionic and anionic ions, oil and organics, which have poisonous
and toxic effects on ecosystems [1,2]. Because of this, purification
and stabilization of environmental waste by titanium dioxide
(TiO
2
) photocatalysis has gained increasing attention due to its bio-
logical and chemical inertness and strong oxidizing power. As is
similar to TiO
2
, zinc oxide (ZnO) is also an important semiconduc-
tor material, it has a promising outlook and has attracted much
attention in solar cells [3], gas sensors [4,5], photocatalysts [6].
This is due to their many unique properties, for example, high elec-
trochemical stability and excellently electronic properties. As is
well known, when the particle sizes of many semiconductors
decrease to nanometer or sub-nanometer scales, these materials
1385-8947/$ - see front matter Ó 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
/>⇑
Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 22 23085236; fax: +86 22 23085110.
E-mail address: (Z. Liu).
Chemical Engineering Journal 235 (2014) 257–263
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Chemical Engineering Journal
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/cej
usually exhibit quantum size effects, presenting different electric
and optical properties from bulk materials [7–9]. ZnO clusters have
a lot of defects including small particle size, instability and very

susceptible to aggregate, so many materials such as glass, polymers
and zeolites are usually used as supports or stabilizers in various
preparation methods [10–12]. Among the various supports, zeolite
is attractive candidate due to its unique uniform pores and channel
sizes, high adsorption capacity, and hydrophobic and hydrophilic
properties to confine the ZnO clusters and limit the growth of par-
ticles [11–13].
As is known from a large number of literatures, ZnO has been
attracting intensive interest not only because of its excellent elec-
trical and optical performances but also because of its various mor-
phologies [14]. It exhibits one of the largest morphology families of
nanostructure system, such as nanopowders [15], nanofilms [16],
nanotubes [17], nanobelts [18,19], nanowires [19,20], nanorods
[21–23] and nanowalls [24,25]. These nanostructures are more
conducive to response due to the increase of contact area with
the external environment. So the one- or two-dimensional self-
assembled ZnO structures with a controllable size and morphology
has also become a hot topic.
To the best of our knowledge, little attention is paid to the two-
dimensional ZnO nanostructure/zeolite composite material. In the
previous works, enough of the zeolite has been prepared using fly
ash as original material by hydrothermal synthesis technique. In
this paper, the highly oriented two-dimensional honeycomb-like
ZnO nanowalls are grown on preexisting textured ZnO nanoparti-
cles seed layer on the surface of zeolite synthesized from fly ash
via sol–gel and hydrothermal synthesis method. As a two-dimen-
sional nanostructure with a high porosity, the vertically aligned
ZnO nanowalls exhibit great promise for photocatalytic applica-
tion, and the performance of ZnO/zeolite composite material is
much higher than individual ZnO or zeolite. To illustrate the effect

of the two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls/zeolite, a
series of composite photocatalysts were designed and synthesized.
The purpose of this study was to detailedly examine the synthesis
process and the effect of technical parameters, such as calcining
temperature, the concentration of the growth solution and reaction
time on photocatalytic reactivity of the supported ZnO nanowalls
for the degradation of methylene blue dye in water under UV light
irradiation.
2. Experimental section
2.1. Materials
All chemicals were of analytical reagent grade and used without
further purification. And all the aqueous solutions were prepared
using distilled water.
2.2. Preparation of synthetic zeolite
The pure-form zeolites were synthesized using fly ash by the al-
kali fusion method. Firstly, the mixture of hydrochloric acid solu-
tion (50%) and fly ash (ratio, 10:1 (mL/g)) was sealed in a beaker,
which was kept in a water bath at 80 °C for 2 h. Then the fly ash
would be filtered, washed repeatedly with distilled water and
dried at 100 °C for 12 h. Secondly, 10 g of the treated fly ash was
mixed with 13 g of NaOH to obtain a homogeneous mixture, after
which the mixture would be heated in a crucible in air at 600 °C for
120 min. Thirdly, the fusion product was dissolved in distilled
water (ratio, 1:10 (g/mL)), and then there would be an aging pro-
cess with vigorous agitation at 25 °C for 24 h. The mixture was
then crystallized at 100 °C for 12 h. Finally, the as-prepared sample
is separated by filtering, washing with distilled water (until the fil-
trate pH reached to 7), dried at 100 °C and being kept in powder
form for further use.
2.3. Synthesis of two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls/

zeolite
The preparation of two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nano-
walls/zeolite composite material includes the coating of ZnO seed
layer on surface of zeolite and the growth of two-dimensional
ZnO. First of all, ZnO seed layer was synthesized by a sol–gel meth-
od using zinc acetate dehydrate (Zn(CH
3
COO)
2
, 15 mmol) as the
starting material, 2-methoxyethanol as the solvent (CH
3
OCH
2
CH
2-
OH, 50 mL) and ethanolamine (MEA, NH
2
CH
2
CH
2
OH, 1.43 mL) as
the stabilizer. The seed solution was stirred at 50 °C for 2 h until
yielding a clear and homogeneous solution. Secondly, ZnO nano-
particles/zeolite composites were obtained by mixing the appro-
priate amount of ZnO seed layer solution with the powder form
of synthetic zeolite at 50 °C for 15 min. After drying at 90 °C for
12 h, the ZnO nanoparticles/zeolite composites were obtained after
annealing in air at different calcining temperatures (280, 320 and

400 °C) for 1 h. Finally, two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO
nanowalls were obtained in the aqueous solution of zinc nitrate
hexahydrate (Zn(NO
3
)
2
Á6H
2
O) and hexamethylenetetramine
(C
6
H
12
N
4
) with different concentrations (0.01, 0.02 and
0.05 mol l
À1
) after heating at 90 °C for different reaction time (2,
6 and 12 h). The as-obtained products were finally dried in air.
2.4. Characterization
The morphology of the samples was observed using a HITACHI
S-4800I field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) and
HITACHI H-7650 transmission electron microscopy (TEM) operated
at an accelerating voltage of 100 kV. The EDS spectra of the sam-
ples analysis were also performed during the FE-SEM observation.
The X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of the nanostructures was per-
formed using a Rigaku D/max-2500 using Cu K
a
radiation

(k = 0.154059 nm). The total surface area, pore size distribution
and nitrogen ad/desorption isotherms were calculated using Nova
3000e Surface Area Analyzers. IR adsorption spectra with transmis-
sion mode were recorded on BIO-RAD FTS3000 IR spectrometer.
Photodegradation of methylene blue was performed by UV irradi-
ation using a 30 W ultraviolet lamp (k
max
= 365 nm). The photode-
composition reactions were carried out in a quartz reactor,
equipped with a cold finger to avoid thermal reactions. In a typical
reaction, 0.1 g of the catalyst and 100 mL of dye solution with a
concentration of 10 mg/L were stirred and irradiated for several
hours. Aliquots were collected at different times during the irradi-
ation, and the concentration of the residual methylene blue was
monitored by UV–visible spectrophotometry.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Characteristics of two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO
nanowalls/zeolite
X-ray diffraction of ZnO/zeolite with the composition of differ-
ent forms is depicted in Fig. 1a–c. It can be seen that all these sam-
ples maintain good zeolite crystal structure. There are some
obvious peaks of zeolite at 2h = 5.6°, 11.2°, 16.2°, 28.2° and 31.4°
(JCPDS, No. 52-0142) (Fig. 1a), moreover, these peaks of zeolite
are also observed in Fig. 1b and c. Meanwhile, in Fig. 1b and c
the obvious peaks are also displayed at 2h = 31.8, 34.4, 36.3, which
is regarded as an attributive indicator of ZnO (100), (002) and
(10 1) (JCPDS, No. 36-1451) (Fig. 1b and c). The intensities of
(10 0) peak and (002) peak in ZnO are very strong compared with
258 Z. Liu et al. /Chemical Engineering Journal 235 (2014) 257–263
those of other peaks (Fig. 1c). Further structure characterization of

the ZnO crystals was performed by TEM (Fig. 1d). The high-resolu-
tion TEM image further confirms that the ZnO nanorod is a single-
crystal characteristic and the lattice spacing of 0.26 nm and
0.28 nm corresponds to the (002) and (10 0) of ZnO. So it is not
much difference between Fig. 1b and c in the XRD patterns when
ZnO microstructure is composed by a hexagonal prism-type single
crystal. And TEM also provides the evidence that ZnO has a pre-
ferred orientation along (100) and (0 02) direction.
Fig. 2 gives the EDS of two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO
nanowalls/zeolite, which shows correct stoichiometry of ZnO to
Al
2
O
3
and SiO
2
in the nanocomposite structure. The mass percent-
age of the element of Zn, O, Al and Si in the nanocomposite struc-
ture was 18.49 wt.%, 42.91 wt.%, 13.31 wt.% and 17.99 wt.%,
respectively. So these four elements of total quality percentage is
92.7 wt.%. Meanwhile, these four elements of total atomic percent-
age is 94.73 at.%. This result means that the phases of the samples
are almost pure.
Fig. 3 presents the SEM images of zeolite (Fig. 3a), ZnO/zeolite
(Fig. 3b) and ZnO nanowalls/zeolite (Fig. 3c and d). As shown in
Fig. 3a–c, ZnO nanostructure is just supported on the surface of
the zeolite, the specific surface area (in Table 1) of the composite
materials will decrease when some zeolite holes are plugged by
ZnO nanostructure. However, the specific surface area of the com-
posite materials will greatly increase when there is ZnO two-

dimensional honeycomb-like nanostructure (Fig. 3d). Additional
Fig. 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of synthetic zeolite (a), ZnO/zeolite (b), two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls/zeolite (c) and high-resolution TEM image of two-
dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls (d).
Fig. 2. EDS elemental analysis of two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls/zeolite.
Z. Liu et al. /Chemical Engineering Journal 235 (2014) 257–263
259
data can also come to it, Table 1 shows the surface area of ZnO/zeo-
lite is 102 m
2
g
À1
, however, the data of the zeolite and ZnO nano-
walls/zeolite are 197 m
2
g
À1
and 395 m
2
g
À1
, respectively.
The pore size distribution and nitrogen ad/desorption isotherms
of two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls/zeolite are
depicted in Fig. 4. As can be seen from Fig. 4a, the pore size of
as-synthesized samples distribution at about 5 nm, this proves that
the two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls/zeolite
composite materials are mesoporous materials. Fig. 4b shows the
nitrogen ad/desorption isotherms are categorized as Type H3 (IU-
PAC) hysteresis loops. Type H3 is formed by fissure hole material
or slice flaky particulate material, and critical increase appeared

at high relative pressure. Consequently, this also supports the
structure characteristics of the two-dimensional honeycomb-like
ZnO nanowalls/zeolite composite materials.
Fig. 5 gives the infrared spectra of zeolite, ZnO/zeolite and ZnO
nanowalls/zeolite, respectively. It can be seen that the characteris-
tic peaks of the zeolite are not changed when ZnO nanostructure
loads on the zeolite. A shoulder between 3550 and 3400 cm
À1
is as-
signed to the asymmetrical stretching of H–O–H or O–H bonds, and
the bending vibration of the water molecules appear in the 1700–
1600 cm
À1
, in the peak of 1050–950 cm
À1
is Si–O and Al–O bonds
respectively. And Zn–O bond appears in the peaks of 500–
400 cm
À1
. So it can be concluded that ZnO has little effect on the
structure of the zeolite during the growth process of ZnO.
Fig. 6 demonstrates the photocatalytic activities of zeolite,
ZnO/zeolite, ZnO nanowalls/zeolite under UV light irradiation.
Also, in order to explain the adsorption performance of zeolite,
the homologous photocatalytic experiment of zeolite is texted
without UV light irradiation. The degradation rate of ZnO nano-
walls/zeolite has reached to nearly 90% when adsorption biodegra-
dation test was carried out for 30 min, meanwhile the degradation
rate of zeolite and ZnO/zeolite has just reached to nearly 70% and
30% respectively. The degradation rate of ZnO/zeolite slowly close

Fig. 3. SEM images of synthetic zeolite (a), ZnO/zeolite (b) and two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls/zeolite (c and d).
Table 1
Brunauer–Emmett–Teller of zeolite, ZnO/zeolite and two-dimensional honeyco mb-
like ZnO nanowalls/zeolite.
Specimens Synthetic
zeolite
ZnO/
zeolite
Two-dimensional honeycomb-like
ZnO nanowalls/zeolite
Datum of BET (Surface
Area/m
2
g
À1
)
197 102 395
Fig. 4. The pore size distribution and nitrogen ad/desorption isotherms of two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls/zeolite.
260 Z. Liu et al. /Chemical Engineering Journal 235 (2014) 257–263
to the ZnO nanowalls/zeolite with the increase of photocatalytic
time. However, it should be noted that the degradation rate of zeo-
lite gradually leveling off in nearly 80%. Because ZnO is also an
important semiconductor material, many pollutants can be de-
graded due to its biological and chemical inertness and strong oxi-
dizing power. The two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO
nanostructure has greatly improved the contact area with the out-
side environment than other ZnO nanostructures. In order to verify
whether such degradation was caused by adsorption or photoca-
talysis, the adsorption profile of zeolite is provided through meth-
ylene blue decoloration experiment without UV light irradiation.

As can be seen from Fig. 5, the absorption efficiency of zeolite al-
most no difference between without UV light irradiation and with
UV light irradiation conditions.
3.2. Effect of calcining temperature on performances of two-
dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls/zeolite
Fig. 7 shows the decoloration of methylene blue for different
calcining temperatures (280, 320 and 400 °C) treatment on
performances of two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nano-
walls/zeolite. It can be seen that the degradation efficiency of
two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls/zeolite at
320 °C is slightly stronger than these samples at 280 °C and
400 °C. However, the degradation rate of ZnO nanowalls/zeolite
with different calcining temperatures (280, 320 and 400 °C) have
reached to more than 80% when adsorption biodegradation test
was carried out for 30 min. Other studies have shown that the crys-
tal structure transition temperature of ZnO is between 300 °C and
400 °C [23,26]. Above results also demonstrated that the calcining
temperature can change the crystalline structure of ZnO loading on
the zeolite, resulting in the difference on methylene blue discolor-
ation under UV irradiation.
3.3. Effect of reaction time on performances of two-dimensional
honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls/zeolite
Fig. 8 gives the effect of reaction time (2, 6, 12 h) on methylene
blue decoloration for two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nano-
walls/zeolite composite photocatalysts. It is obvious that the deg-
radation efficiency of two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO
nanowalls/zeolite increases with the increasing of growth time
from Fig. 8. The morphology of ZnO nanostructures will be affected
by the reaction time during the ZnO growth solution. The ZnO
nucleates typically show two groups of crystal surface: (1 00)

and (002). The ZnO can grow along the two groups of planes but
with different rates. The (100) direction takes the lead in growth
when ZnO seeds start to grow, then ZnO is also growing along
(00 2) direction as time goes on. So the specific surface area of
ZnO nanostructures is expanded as the increasing of growth time,
thereby the degradation efficiency will also be increasing in such
conditions.
3.4. Effect of the concentration of the growth solution on performances
of two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls/zeolite
Fig. 9 demonstrates the photocatalytic activities of two-dimen-
sional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls/zeolite composite photocat-
alysts for different concentrations (0.01, 0.02 and 0.05 mol l
À1
)of
Fig. 5. Transmission FT-IR spectra of ZnO/zeolite with the composition of different
forms.
Fig. 6. Decoloration of methylene blue for ZnO/zeolite with the composition of
different forms.
Fig. 7. Decoloration of methylene blue for different calcining temperature of two-
dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls/zeolite.
Fig. 8. Decoloration of methylene blue for two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO
nanowalls/zeolite with different reaction time.
Z. Liu et al. / Chemical Engineering Journal 235 (2014) 257–263
261
the growth solution. However, the degradation efficiency of two-
dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls/zeolite for different
concentrations of the growth solution have not too much of a dif-
ference. Concluded from this figure, the concentration of the
growth solution should be moderate, which is controlled by the
concentration of ZnO growth solution and kinetics. So integrating

all factors, 0.02 mol l
À1
was chosen as the concentration of the
growth solution in our experiment.
3.5. Investigations on the growth mechanism of two-dimensional
honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls/zeolite
In our study, two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls
were supported on synthetic zeolite from fly ash by a simple sol–
gel and hydrothermal synthesis method, which are illustrated in
Fig. 10. Fig. 10a and b display the ball model of zeolite molecular
sieve, zeolite is an attractive sorptive material owing to its unique
uniform pores and channel sizes, high adsorption capacity, and
hydrophobic and hydrophilic properties, which may provide selec-
tive exclusion of undesired molecules or ions. The preparation of
two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls/zeolite compos-
ite material includes the coating of ZnO seed layer on surface of
zeolite and the growth of two-dimensional ZnO (Fig. 10a–f). In this
growth process, The ZnO nucleates typically show two groups of
crystal surface: (10 0) and (002), where the (00 2) surface is per-
pendicular to another. The ZnO can grow along the two groups of
planes but with different rates, which are controlled by the ZnO
kinetics. The (10 0) direction takes the lead in growth when ZnO
seeds start to grow (Fig. 10c), then ZnO is also growing along
(00 2) direction as time goes on (Fig. 10d). The growth of ZnO
nanowalls form aqueous solution is based on the formation of solid
phase from a solution, in this experiment, Zn(NO
3
)
2
is used as

source of zinc and C
6
H
12
N
4
as source of OH
À
. With the increase
of grow temperature, The C
6
H
12
N
4
begins to decompose into
ammonia and then Zn(OH)
2
occurred. The ZnO film grows from
the nuclei precipitation on the substrate because this solution is
heated (These can be represented by the following reactions)
[23,26,27]. After an appropriate time, ZnO nanostructure will form
the two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls structure
(Fig. 10e and f). Fig. 10e is a plan view of such a nanostructure,
Fig. 10g is a honeycomb in order to more visual expresses the im-
age of such two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls/zeo-
lite structures.
CH
2
N

4
þ 6H
2
O ! 6HCHO þ NH
3
ð1Þ
NH
3
þ H
2
O $ NH
þ
4
þ OH
À
ð2Þ
2OH
À
þ Zn

! ZnðOHÞ
2
ð3Þ
ZnðOHÞ
2
! ZnO
ðsÞ
þ H
2
O ð4Þ

There are two kinds of reaction routes including adsorbent pro-
cess and photocatalytic degradation process in the experimental
process for catalytic degradation of methylene blue by using
two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls/zeolite
composite materials. The methylene blue organic molecules were
firstly adsorbed on the surface of ZnO nanowalls and the outside
or inside of zeolites. Meanwhile, the photocatalytic degradation
process would take place in the surface of ZnO nanowalls, Then
methylene blue organic molecules in the inside or outside of zeo-
lites would be transferred to the surface of ZnO nanowalls when
Fig. 9. Decoloration of methylene blue for two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO
nanowalls/zeolite with different concentrations of the growth solution.
Fig. 10. Schematic diagram of two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls/zeolite.
262 Z. Liu et al. / Chemical Engineering Journal 235 (2014) 257–263
the concentration of methylene blue organic molecules on the sur-
face of ZnO nanowalls would be gradually reduced, this is based on
the principle of diffusion. So these processes played a role in the
methylene blue adsorption degradation experiment repeatedly un-
til the end of the experiment.
4. Conclusions
Two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls were sup-
ported on synthetic zeolite from fly ash by a simple sol–gel and
hydrothermal synthesis method in order to maximize the specific
surface area and photocatalytic performance as well as the retriev-
ability. The technologic parameters, such as calcining temperature,
reaction time and the concentration of the growth solution, have
an important effect on the structure and photocatalytic activity
of the two-dimensional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls/zeolite
composite photocatalysts. The degradation rate of ZnO nano-
walls/zeolite has reached to nearly 90% when adsorption biodegra-

dation test was carried out for 30 min under UV light irradiation
when the calcining temperature is 320 °C, the hydrothermal reac-
tion time is 12 h and the concentration of the growth solution is
0.02 mol l
À1
. The results show that the as-prepared two-dimen-
sional honeycomb-like ZnO nanowalls/zeolite composite photocat-
alysts present a huge potential application in wastewater
treatment.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from Na-
tion Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 51102174) and Nat-
ural Science Foundation of Tianjin (11JCYBJC27000).
References
[1] S.B. Wang, Y.L. Peng, Natural zeolites as effective adsorbents in water and
wastewater treatment, Chemical Engineering Journal 156 (2010) 11–24
.
[2] Z.F. Liu, Z.C. Liu, Y. Wang, Y.B. Li, L. Qu, L. E, J. Ya, P.Y. Huang, Photocatalysis of
TiO
2
nanoparticles supported on natural zeolite, Materials Technology 27
(2012) 267–271
.
[3] A. Belaidi, T. Dittrich, D. Kieven, J. Tornow, K. Schwarzburg, M. Kunst, N. Allsop,
M.C. Lux-Steiner, S. Gavrilov, ZnO-nanorod arrays for solar cells with
extremely thin sulfidic absorber, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 93
(2009) 1033–1036
.
[4] M. Tiemann, Porous metal oxides as gas sensors, Chemistry – A European
Journal 13 (2007) 8376–8388

.
[5] J.X. Wang, X.W. Sun, Y. Yang, H. Huang, Y.C. Lee, O.K. Tan, L. Vayssieres,
Hydrothermally grown oriented ZnO nanorod arrays for gas sensing
applications, Nanotechnology 17 (2006) 4995–4998
.
[6] K.M. Parida, S.S. Dash, D.P. Das, Physico-chemical characterization and
photocatalytic activity of zinc oxide prepared by various methods, Journal of
Colloid and Interface Science 298 (2006) 787–793
.
[7] R. Viswanatha, S. Sapra, B. Satpati, P.V. Satyam, B.N. Dev, D.D. Sarma,
Understanding the quantum size effects in ZnO nanocrystals, Journal of
Materials Chemistry 14 (2004) 661–668
.
[8] N. Yao, S.L. Cao, K.L. Yeung, Mesoporous TiO
2
–SiO
2
aerogels with hierarchal
pore structures, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 117 (3) (2009) 570–
579
.
[9] S.L. Cao, K.L. Yeung, P.L. Yue, Preparation of freestanding and crack-free
titania–silica aerogels and their performance for gas phase, photocatalytic
oxidation of VOCs, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 68 (3–4) (2006) 99–
108
.
[10] H.L. Xia, F.Q. Tang, Surface synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles on silica
spheres: preparation and characterization, Journal of Physical Chemistry B 107
(2003) 9175–9178
.

[11] M. Khatamian, Z. Alaji, A.A. Khandar, Synthesis and characterization of
polycrystalline ZnO/HZSM-5 nanocomposites, Journal of the Iranian
Chemical Society 8 (2011) 44–54
.
[12] J. Chen, Z.C. Feng, P.L. Ying, C. Li, ZnO clusters encapsulated inside micropores
of zeolites studied by UV Raman and laser-induced luminescence
spectroscopies, Journal of Physical Chemistry B 108 (2004) 12669–12676
.
[13] J. Shi, J. Chen, Z. Feng, T. Chen, X. Wang, P. Ying, C. Li, Time-resolved
photoluminescence characteristics of subnanometer ZnO clusters confined in
the micropores of zeolites, Journal of Physical Chemistry B 110 (2006) 25612–
25618
.
[14] Y.J. Feng, M. Zhang, M. Guo, X.D. Wang, Studies on the PEG-assisted
hydrothermal synthesis and growth mechanism of ZnO microrod and
mesoporous microsphere arrays on the substrate, Crystal Growth & Design
10 (2010) 1500–1507
.
[15] D. Millersa, L. Grigorjevaa, W. Łojkowskib, T. Strachowski, Luminescence of
ZnO nanopowders, Radiation Measurements 38 (2004) 589–591
.
[16] C. Bauer, G. Boschloo, E. Mukhtar, A. Hagfeldt, Ultrafast relaxation dynamics of
charge carriers relaxation in ZnO nanocrystalline thin films, Chemical Physics
Letters 387 (2004) 176–181
.
[17] X.H. Kong, X.M. Sun, X.L. Li, Y.D. Li, Catalytic growth of ZnO nanotubes,
Materials Chemistry and Physics 82 (2003) 997–1001
.
[18] T.J. Sun, J.S. Qiu, C.H. Liang, Controllable fabrication and photocatalytic activity
of ZnO nanobelt arrays, Journal of Physical Chemistry C 112 (2008) 715–721

.
[19] Y. Ding, F. Zhang, Z.L. Wang, Deriving the three-dimensional structure of ZnO
nanowires/nanobelts by scanning transmission electron microscope
tomography, Nano Research 6 (2013) 253–262
.
[20] M. Navaneethan, J. Archana, M. Arivanandhan, Y. Hayakawa, Functional
properties of amine-passivated ZnO nanostructures and dye-sensitized solar
cell characteristics, Chemical Engineering Journal 213 (2012) 70–77
.
[21] J.J. Song, S.W. Lim, Effect of seed layer on the growth of ZnO nanorods, Journal
of Physical Chemistry C 111 (2007) 596–600
.
[22] M. Faisal, A.A. Ismail, A.A. Ibrahim, H. Bouzid, S.A. Al-Sayari, Highly efficient
photocatalyst based on Ce doped ZnO nanorods: Controllable synthesis and
enhanced photocatalytic activity, Chemical Engineering Journal 229 (2013)
225–233
.
[23] Z.F. Liu, L. E, J. Ya, Y. Xin, Growth of ZnO nanorods by aqueous solution method
with electrodeposited ZnO seed layers, Applied Surface Science 255 (2009)
6415–6420
.
[24] X.D. Wang, Y. Ding, Z. Li, J.H. Song, Z.L. Wang, Single-crystal mesoporous ZnO
thin films composed of nanowalls, Journal of Physical Chemistry C 113 (2009)
1791–1794
.
[25] H.T. Ng, J. Li, M.K. Smith, P. Nguyen, A. Cassell, J. Han, M. Meyyappan, Growth
of epitaxial nanowires at the junctions of nanowalls, Science 300 (2003) 1249
.
[26] Z.F. Liu, J. Ya, L. E, Effects of substrates and seed layers on solution growing ZnO
nanorods, Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry 14 (2010) 957–963

.
[27] Y.B. Li, Z.F. Liu, Y. Wang, Z.C. Liu, J.H. Han, J. Ya, ZnO/CuInS
2
Core/Shell
heterojunction nanoarray for photoelectrochemical water splitting,
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 37 (2012) 15029–15037
.
Z. Liu et al. / Chemical Engineering Journal 235 (2014) 257–263
263

×