CONTENT
LIST OF TABLE
i
!"""#""$#%&'''''''''''''''''
()
!"#""*)#(&''''''''''''''''''
+,
)#" )#%&''''''''''''''''''-
$.''''''''''''/
ii
Faculty of Agronomy Hanoi University of Agricultural
Advance crop science program
Progress reports: SUBJECT ADVANCED RESEARCH PROGRAM 2010-2011
I. Introduction
,
0
Tomato yellow leaf curl .
1 2 ) )
%)2 3 ) )
45)*&20-
/,%))
4Bemisia tabaci)
" %)
62%)74)52
)4)522
8,
.22)
4! 52 49! & 5
:49!: 562
&! ! &
2
)*)
2);2)
8"";2! ()2
<
*&#%)
07“ Investigating,study,
1
diogonistic Begomovirus virus on Tomato=
.2. Objectives and Requirements
6>7
#)%)
.?7
# 8)) (
&
#*)%)
II. Literature review
2.1. Researches in the world.
2)%82""2@
;;,2;)
,)2)
#)))2)
2)2)
2.2. Host range
( ) %) 2 8
%)9! )-+ )A,
4;;54!5%
!2!2!2!
9! )7B)2
$2$ )24&52>4*5
2.3. Symptoms
2
9#,
)
)
2
22)22
22)8)
2.4. Cause agent
8 """ 8 1 48 5
9! %))23
20 "#+" *& )
/""-)2#*&
7*&*&%2-""*&
)2*&%)
2.5. Vector and transmitation of Begomovirus
Bemisia tabaci 4(7 Aleyrodidae), 2 2
2)2,$,88
)2 ) -"" )) 2
82
2?)))CC2
#+#;28)
2)-D
;D"D.(
+"#-"E6212
!,2Bemisia tabaci ,)
1)))00
))2 +"" )
0))72
)1
3
) 9) #) ))
?)2)
))2
))))
)
III.Material and method
3.1. Location and duration of the study
#)(&.
# . $ $)2(F
)
3.2. Materials
#$7
# ! 4 (
(2&*2$2()92(*)5
# ! 2 $. 2 ?2 # )2 2
)2#
- .)G
%*&1
• %HIJB
• &6("J
3.3. Methodology
4
3.3.1. Field surveying
)2)
)
)7 *4)
5
3.3.2. Collecting and storing samples
#)7)
)7
H&
H!2
H
#)7)),
H*)7))#))
H)7#"
"
3.4 Research method
3.4.1. Survey methodology in prevalence and white fly density on the field
#8))7"&##/$$*
#CG)2))2"G)
#$: ))2"G
Ratio of disease
5
&
$4E5KLLLLLLLLLL1""
)
White fly density:
)
M4G5KLLLLLLLLLLL
)
3.4.2. DNA extraction
*&17
(i) )%
7
# )")"")
# )"%HIJB,-"
")
# :-"
"
7
# )"14775,)
# )"""G"2,)
4"+5
+7
# $"+14775
,)
#)",)
4"5
6
7
# $$,#"
"
# )",)2*&
2-7.BC"
4"2CG52B
,1B
C7*&+"
/7**&",#"
(ii) F)&6("J*&1
#")
#"&6("J
#*"#"""J2(K/
3.5. PCR test7
3.5.1. PCR testing:
N$.
#3%)*&#%). O%)4(2""-5
%). 7<#(J*(:%3
N
#+<
%)7<#393.3339.39.
N
#+<
N94G52.43G52(4GG52J4G52%4G3G52*4G3G52:43G5
K
# ! 4K5
H*! 4K5
4!5
<
33333333+
<
4!C-5
HF! P.##7
7
4!-/+5
<
333+
<
4!C"/5
#9! & 4K+/-57
H*9! & ###?7
4!";5
<
3333+
<
4!C5
HF9! & #.
#
#?7
4!-5
<
3333+
<
4!/"5
#*&#I)%O%.
%7<#3333333#+<
%.7<#3333333333#+<
$*&#I#0+""#""
3.5.2. Conducting PCR:
H8)$.7
(
6 72Q
*% 72"Q
&$ 7"2+Q
7"2+Q
. 7"2+Q
*)
7"2Q
*& 7"2Q
7Q
H$)$.
;
1
;
+" 1+
8
"
+
C
+
C
1
3.5.3. PCR product electrophoresis:
* $.E))B
)")G
N3J#4%5B
"" )+"#"
N31)))
)
9
IV. Result and discussion
4.1 The survey field
4.1.1. Describe the symptoms in the field
8 2)
)7)#222)#
2 # 2 )#
)2)
*) ,
*) ) 49! 5
2)
) ,
222
)
24
57 2)
22)28))2
@)2
%
22)(
4(2$2&*5)
)2))22
,
10
((
((+
11
4.1.2. Surveyand white fly density of disease on the field
4.1.2.1 Tomato yellow leaf curl and white fly density developmenmt on F1 hybrid and
VL2000 in fall-winter 2010 in Phu Chan-Bac Ninh
Table 4.1.2.1 Tomato yellow leaf curl and white fly density developmenmt on F1 hybrid and
VL2000 in fall-winter 2010 in Phu Chan-Bac Ninh
No Date
Stage of
development
F1 hybrid VL2000
Prevalenc
e (%)
Whitefly
density
(individual/leaf)
Prevalenc
e
(%)
White fly density
(individual/leaf)
"G";G" ) "2"" "2
"" "
G";G" ) "2"" "2"
" "/
+ ;G";G" %) "2" "2"
"" "+/
-G";G" %) 2+ "2
+" "/
"+G"G" ) 2" "2
-" "-
- "G"G" ) 2-" "2
-" "+/
C CG"G" -2+ "2-
C-" "/
/ G"G" 3 /2"" "2/
;" "-
; +G"G" 3 ;2+" "2C/
""" "/"
" "CGG" 3
"2" "2
-" "-+
!"""
!""")
12
) ) ) 7 ""E
!"""-E !"""
8))""E
))""E !"""M
)))/""E;+"E4
+E52 !""";E"""E4"/E5
M)M) !"""
M)))))
)8-621
4"-G5+G"G""M"C/G
"/", !""",
,
,8$J)
4.1.2.2. Tomato yellow leaf curl and white fly density developmenmt on Hong Chau and
VL101 in fall-winter 2010 in Dong Anh – Ha Noi
Table 4.1.2.2. Tomato yellow leaf curl and white fly density developmenmt on Hong Chau and
VL101 in fall-winter 2010 in Dong Anh – Ha Noi
13
No Date
Stage of
development
Hong Chau VL101
Prevalenc
e (%)
White fly density
(individual/leaf)
Prevalenc
e (%)
White fly
density
(individual/leaf)
"G";G"
)
"" " """ ""C
G";G"
)
" "/ "" "-
+ ;G";G"
%)
"" "+/ "/" "
-G";G"
%)
+" "/ -" "+
"+G"G"
)
-" "- +-" "
- "G"G"
)
-" "+/ /" "
C CG"G"
C-" "/ -"" "/
/ G"G"
3
;" "- -/" "-
; +G"G"
3
""" "/" C-" "
" "CG"G"
3
-" "- ;" ""
() !"
)) !""E2
""E()()< !""/"E
$)7 !"-"E;E
;4/"E52()/"E-/"E4""E5)
C&4))57 !"-"E2();"E
14
M2) !"
1))
+
6))7 !""/"G2()"
G
!")()
22
))
+Tomato yellow leaf curl and white fly density developmenmt on Chanoka and
and C155 in spring - summer 2011 in Vo Cuong – Bac Ninh
Table 4.1.2.3. Tomato yellow leaf curl and white fly density development onChanoka and
and C155 in spring - summer 2011 in Vo Cuong – Bac Ninh
15
No Date
Stage of
development
Chanoka C155
Prevalenc
e (%)
White fly density
(individual/leaf)
Prevalenc
e (%)
Whitefly
density
(individual/leaf)
GG"
)
""" " "" ""C
GG"
)
"/ " " "C
+ ;GG"
%)
"- "; "
-GG"
%)
+ "++ / "+
"+GG"
)
" ; "+;
- "GG"
)
" +- "+"
C CGG"
- " "/
/ GG"
3
/ "C "+
; +GG"
3
; "- - "-"
" "CG+G"
3
" " /" ""
)2)
B)##.
+ , )
) )(2
)) 82
16
),)8)2)
7,"E/"E*)
)"/E,"E$
))8,-E/E4
/E52EE4E5
M)))28))
),"-G"-"G
4"G"G"""+G"CG"52
8)
)
22
!"'
4.2.PCR test results tomato samples collected in the field
M
H74(2(53!#(&
+74(5!P(!P(
74(5 !P(!P(
74(+5)PP(
-74(5*P(P(
C74&*5P&P&*
/74$5$
Table 4.2PCR test results tomato samples collected in the field
17
& < %) 9
( # # #
( # # #
+ ( H H #
( H # H
(+ H # H
- ( H H H
C &* # # #
/ $ # # #
M ) *&# %)
4%)G%).5,)
! 9 & /
(2&*2$2(&F) F)
4%)G%).5G/)0
""1%)
! ## G ! ##. 4
! 5+G/)0"
1!
9! & ##. G 9! & ##
49! & 5G/))0
+/-9! &
.$.-
4*#(#
(54H5
49! & 2 ! 5 ) 1
))J1
?))
)
9! & !
)"""))
18
M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Begomovirus
19
,$.)2 9! & ! / J
*&&&/&)&/
V. Conclusion and suggestion
5.1. Conclusion:
)(
8)))) )2
)
$.)! & 9 & M
&
4 9! & 5 ! & 4 & 5 G/
9! & 2+G/ & G/
M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
ToLCVVV
TYLCVNV
20
+%)(2)$.
(M>)
,()
5.2. Suggestion:
*)22
)))7
# :)))22
#
Reference
&) 4;/52 Dieu tra nghien cuu mot so benh virus chu yeu cua ba cay
trong ho ca ( salanaceae) co y nghia kinh te ; thuoc la , ca chua, khoai tay. )!
$2#C
J4""+52 Chan đoan nhanh benh hai thuc vat)2
(&
+ 2O)294;;52#
)* ."2;#//
0,2(O!2(4;;C5A worldwide survey of tomato yellow leaf curl
viruses. Archives of Virology 2+;#"-
21
0,2 (2 32 J O 32 J 4""5
)%#)
%)"2#+
- )(2""/2Journal of General Virology4""/52/;2+P+-5
C R,2(2!)2J2$2M4""5*&)
#)BJ%6R
"2-/#--C
/ 6). ;;/2;;;2"""2""2""2""+
; ?2J22R4""5.)
7 S ) 1
0 )"2#C;
" 4(2222.2$2()2.2 2JO*2R4""/5Molecular
characterization of begomoviruses and DNA satellites from Vietnam: additional
evidence that the New World geminiviruses were present in the Old World prior to
continental separationR3 )/;7+#+-5
32:22M22!2%,2!!2.022.2J(2.2
JJ&2J299O()2!4""5 Molecular characterization of
begomoviruses associated with leafcurl diseases of tomato in Bangladesh, Laos,
Malaysia, Myanmar, and Vietnam. Plant Dis/2/-
J,2$32%28*2!222*2.2.O%2R:
4;;5)B. tabaci4358
%7;;2-;#CB*3.J78
+ J2 B O  R 4"""5 Tomato yellow leaf curl virus, an
emerging virus complex causing epidemics worldwide. .C2+P+
$2 %2 *02 J#R O &02 4;;-5 Viral diseases causing the greatest
economic losses to the tomato crop. II. The tomato yellow leaf curl virus - a review.
Scienta Hort-C2#;-
22
2R2%2*J2%2.M2%2R:2?2J2(2
% *2 .,2 B $2 )2 * 4""5 3 In "Virus
Taxonomy. VIIIth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses"
4J?2JJ2RJ2F*)2!%2B52
+"#+-BG$2!
- 32:4;;52 Guidelines for diagmostic works in plant virology
2&22 .*2;P;
23