THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 180
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
meltdown.Oncethecurrentglobalcrisiseases,wecanbe
surethatgovernmentswillturntothetaskofattempting
tocontainthisriskinthefuturebyimposingregulationon
themarkets.However,theimpactofadvancingtechnolo-
gy willnotbeconfinedto justthefinancialmarkets. We
will ultimatelyhave to address the issue of systemic risk
throughouttheentireworldeconomy,andthiswilleven-
tuallyinvolvetransitioningtoamorerobustmodel.
The Market Economy of the Future
The scheme that I have proposed above essentially in-
volvesadoptingspecialtaxestorecapturetheincomefrom
lost jobs and then having the government redirect that
income according to individual incentives—without the
requirement for traditional “work.” The conservative
readerislikelytoviolentlyrecoilfromthisidea.Isthisnot
theworstformofRobinHoodsocialism?AmInotpro-
posingtostealfromthosewhohaveworkedhardtobuild
abusinessandthensimplygivetheproceedstomassesof
indolentpeopleinreturnfordoingnothing?
IwillarguethatIamproposingnoneofthesethings.
Putyourselfinthe placeof a smallbusiness owner. Re-
memberthatwearestillthinkingintermsofourextreme
future scenario with 75 percent unemployment. How
wouldyourbusinesssurviveinsuchasituation?
The special wage recapture taxes thatyou would be
requiredtopayasabusinessownerwouldbeaninconve-
nienceto you;youwould,ofcourse,preferthatyounot
havetopaythem.(Thesamecouldbesaidofthewages
youcurrentlypaytoyouremployees.)However,thewage
Transition / 181
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
recapture taxes paid by every other business will collectively
powertheconsumersthatdriveyoursales(exactlyasthe
wagespaidbyotherbusinessesdotoday).
Wemustfindawaytoredirectincometolargenum-
bersofconsumers,ormarketdemandwillnotbesustain-
able. It is not necessaryto require workforthatincome
becauseinanautomatedeconomysuchworkwillnotbe
required.Therecipientsofthisincomewillnotdo“noth-
ing;”theywill,infact,bemotivatedtobehaveinwaysthat
benefitusall.ThenewtaxesthatIproposearesimplya
replacementforthewagesthatwouldhavebeenpaidina
lessautomatedeconomy.
Without government intervention of this type, free
market forces, together with increasing automation, will
driveoursocietytowardanunsustainableconcentrationof
income.Imagineamodern,industrializedsocietyinwhich
95percentofthepopulationisimpoverishedandleadsa
subsistence level existence with little or no discretionary
income,whiletheremaining 5percent receivesnearlyall
theincome.Insuchascenario,themajorityofindustries
now in existence would collapse. The businesses from
which most wealthy people derive their incomes would
fail.
Whilethisisobviouslyanextremeexample,thereality
isthateconomicdeclinewouldoccurlongbeforesuchan
extreme concentration of income was achieved, and that
declinewould be accompaniedbythedeflationofnearly
allasset values. Thewealthywill notbeableto maintain
their high incomes by selling things exclusively to each
THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 182
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
other.Thedaysofthefeudaleconomyaregone.Wenow
haveamassmarketeconomy.
Aslongasanenormousmassmarketofviablecon-
sumersispreserved,theprimaryincentivesthatdrivethe
free market economy will remain intact. In the future, it
willstillbepossibletobecomeextremelywealthybybuild-
ing a new business or product. In fact, it may in some
ways,beeasiertodosothantoday.Manybusinessstrateg-
ists believe that future marketing will increasingly entail
sellingcustomizedoruniqueproductstohugenumbersof
small market niches.
52
Evolving online technologies will
makeiteasiertoreachtheconsumersinthesetinyniches
andofferthemhighlypersonalizedproductsandservices.
This will likely create many opportunities for entrepre-
neursandsmallbusinessestocreatenewproductsgeared
towardspecific marketsegments.Itwill alsoenablelarge
businessesandnewindustriestosellhugenumbersofdif-
ferentproductsonahighlytargetedbasis.
However,itshouldbeobviousthattheexistenceofa
hugenumberofviablemarketnichesdependsonarobust
and ever expanding universe of consumers. In order to
provide future entrepreneurswith a richmarket for new
ventures, we have to somehow ensure that the average
consumers in our population have access to reliable in-
comestreamsevenastraditionaljobsareincreasinglyau-
tomatedaway.
ConsiderthebusinessmodelofanInternetcompany
likeGoogle.Googlereliesonrevenuefromonlineadver-
tisementsthatarehighlytargeted.Theadvertiserswhouse
Google’ssystemdosobecausetheyhaveconfidencethat
Transition / 183
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
their adswill attractviableconsumerswithadequate dis-
cretionaryincome.Intoday’seconomy,nearlyallofthose
consumersrelyonjobs.Ifatsomepointinthefuture,it
becameobviousthattheuniverseofviableconsumerswas
substantiallydiminished,advertiserswould befarlessin-
terested and Google’s business model would clearly be
threatened.
Historyhasshownthatonlyaselectminorityofthe
populationhasthecombinationofskill,entrepreneurship,
accesstocapital,andluckthatisrequiredtostartandrun
a successful business. This reality will not change: most
people aredestined to bebuyers rather thansellers.The
individualswho do succeed inbuilding businesses inthe
future will likely find that wages paid to employees ac-
countforafarsmallerfractionoftheirexpenses.Howev-
er, they will have to pay higher taxes to compensate for
this;otherwise,theywillnotenjoyvibrantmarketdemand
fortheproductsandservicestheycreate.
An International View
Manypeoplemightobjecttotheideaspresentedhereon
the grounds that if acountry, such asthe United States,
weretoraisebusinesstaxessubstantiallyitwouldbecome
less competitive relative to other countries and would
thereforeattract less investment. Ifyou look backat the
table on page 165, which showed how a wage recapture
taxmightaffecttheunitcostofahypotheticalproductor
service,theunitcostisclearlyhigheraftertaxestorecap-
turelostwagesareimplemented.Forproductsorservices
thatfaceinternationalcompetition,thiswouldconstitutea
THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 184
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
problem.One solution might be to relymore on acon-
sumptiontaxratherthatadirectbusinesstax.Incountries
such as the United States, of course, the manufacturing
sector has already largelymigrated overseas and employ-
ment has become increasingly service oriented. In the
U.S.,thegreatestdangerisgoingoccurwhenthe service
sectorautomates,anddirectforeigncompetitionislessof
anissueinthatarena.
In the long run, job automation will clearly be a
worldwide phenomenon. No country will escape its im-
pact,andthisincludesdevelopingnationswithlowwages.
AsIpointedoutinthepreviouschapter,wearelikelyto
seeashiftintheincentivesthatdrivebusinessestochoose
wheretheyinvest.Politicalstability,minimizedtransporta-
tion and energy costs, and proximity to sustained con-
sumptionmarketswillbeprimaryissuesinthefuture.
Inthebroader sense,wecanspeculate thatanauto-
matedeconomywould,inmanyways,redefinethenature
ofglobaltrade.Sometradebetweencountriesoccursbe-
causeoftheavailabilityofnaturaloragriculturalresources
(oilorFrenchwine,forexample),butmuchtradeoccurs
becauseoflabordynamics.Ifaparticularcountryhaslow
wagesand/oraparticularlyskilledworkforce,itcurrently
enjoys an advantage that will lead to trade. In an auto-
matedeconomy,whereworkersplayafarlesssignificant
role,thistradedynamicwouldobviouslybelessimportant.
There are really only two primary reasons that the
government ofa country would want to attract factories
andbusinessinvestment:jobsandtaxation.Asautomation
reducesthenumberofjobs,taxationwillbecomeincrea-
Transition / 185
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
singly important. It seems likely that once this issue be-
comesapparent,somedegreeofcooperationbetweenna-
tions will develop. Perhaps international entities such as
the World Trade Organization will address this issue by
settingstandardsfortaxation.Wecannotexpectthatthe
transitiontoanewmodelwouldbeentirelysmooth,and
perhapsinsomecases,protectionistmeasureswillbene-
cessary.Whilefreetrademaybedesirable,itshouldclearly
bealowerprioritythanthepreservationofourentireeco-
nomicmodel.
Transitioning to the New Model
Now that we have seen how the government might be
abletosupporttheconsumersofthefuturebyredirecting
incentive-based income streams captured through taxa-
tion, we can begin to thinkabout howto transition into
thisnewmodel.Theprimaryproblemwefaceisthatthe
currenteconomyisstillhighlyreliantonhumanlabor.We
needtodevelopasystemthatavoidscreatingadisincen-
tivetoperformnecessarywork.Inotherwords,wedon’t
wanttocreateinequitiesbyrequiringsomepeopletowork
andnotothers,andwedon’twanta“moralhazard”that
pushes people to avoid work and seek government sup-
portinstead.
The answer must be sometype ofjob sharing solu-
tion.Theexactmechanicsofthissolutionwouldneedto
vary depending of the nature of the job. For many job
types,itmightbepossibleto simplymovetowardapart
time work schedule so that more people are employed
doingthesameamountofwork.Forjobsthatdonotlend
THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 186
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
themselvestoparttimework,arotationschemecouldbe
used. A worker might rotateinto a job on a monthly or
evenayearlybasis.Jobscouldbesharedbygivingworkers
asabbaticalatdifferenttimesoftheyear.
Ineachcase,workerswouldbesupportedbysupple-
mentary incentive-based income streams from the gov-
ernment. As automation progresses and more jobs are
eliminated,thissupplementaryincomestreamwillbecome
anincreasinglyimportantcomponentoftotal income. In
largecorporationsandorganizations,itmightbepossible
tohandlejobrotationsinternally.Insmallerbusinesses,it
would probably be necessary to set up external mechan-
ismssothatworkerscouldrotatebetweenemployers.Ob-
viously, regulationsand/or incentives
*
wouldberequired
toimplementthesejobsharingschemes.
Needless tosay, the businesscommunityis likelyto
initially opposethis idea and dismiss it as expensive and
unworkable.AsI’vepointedouthowever,businesseswill
ultimatelyhave to choose betweengovernment interven-
tion and taxation and the existence of a robust market.
Oncethistradeoffbecomesclear,oppositionwillbeless
vigorous.Weseeasimilarphenomenoninthehealthcare
arena, where many industries that opposed efforts at
reform in the 1990s nowat least recognize the problem
andhavelinedupbehindthegeneralconceptofreform—
althoughnoconsensushasyetbeenreachedonasolution.
*
Thetaxcodecouldbeusedtoprovideanincentiveforparticipation
inajobsharingscheme.InthepreviouschapterIsuggestedtheidea
of“progressive”deductionsforwagespaid.Inasimilarfashion,high-
erdeductionscouldbeprovidedtobusinessesthatagreedtoincorpo-
ratejobsharingintotheirbusinessmodels.
Transition / 187
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
Onethingthatisabundantlyclearisthat,inaworld
where traditional jobs are disappearing, access to health
careinsurancecannotbecoupledtoemployment.Oneof
theprimaryneartermgoalsfortheUnitedStatesshould
be to establish auniversal healthcare system thatisnot
tied to jobs. Additionally, as I pointed out in Chapter 3,
payrolltaxes will become increasinglyunsustainable. The
firststepsintransitioningtoanewmodelwillhavetobe
toshifttheburdenformaintainingsocialprogramsaway
fromtaxesonindividualjobsandtowardabroader,more
sustainablemodelwhichfallsmorefairlyoncapitalinten-
siveindustriesthatemployrelativelyfewpeople.Thebur-
den that falls on a business should depend not on how
many workers it employs, but on how successful that
businessisatderivingwealthfromthemarket.
Onceasystemisputinplacethatallowsworktobe
shared on an equitable basis, it should be possible to
achieve a relatively smooth transition into an automated
economy.Overtime,theincentive-basedincomestreams
provided by the government would increase, and the
amountoftraditionalworkperformedwoulddecrease.As
jobautomationincreasesandthewagespaidbybusinesses
fall, the special taxes that have been put in place would
needtobegraduallyincreasedtorecapturetheincome.
Inadditiontotheprimaryeconomicobjectiveofsus-
taining consumer demand, this would of course, have
manypositiveimpactsonsociety.Individualswouldhave
moretime forfamily,leisure,personalhealth andeduca-
tion. Better educated consumers with more leisure time
andmoreconfidenceintheirfutureincomeswouldresult
THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 188
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
insustainedconsumerspending,vibrantdemandfornew
products and services, and long-term economic growth.
As incentive-based income became more important rela-
tivetotraditionalwages,individualswouldseeincreasingly
potent incentives to act in environmentally conscious
ways,andthatwouldpotentiallyhaveasignificant,favora-
ble impact on climate change and other environmental
challengesinthecomingdecades.
Transitional Economy
Average Income
Time
Machines Becoming
Autonomous
Consumers and
Workers
Decoupled
Machines Getting
Better
Value
Transition / 189
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
Keynesian Grandchildren
While few contemporary economists seem particularly
concernedabouttheseeminglyinevitabletransitiontoan
automated economy, one legendary economist did have
remarkableinsight into the future.In1930, as the world
plungedintotheGreatDepression,JohnMaynardKeynes
wrote an essay entitled “Economic Possibilities for our
Grandchildren.”
53
In his essay, Keynes coined the term
“technologicalunemployment,”writing:
Wearebeinginflictedwith anewdiseaseofwhichsome
readersmanynotyethaveheard thename,butofwhich
theywillhearagreatdealintheyearstocome—namely,
technologicalunemployment.Thismeansunemploymentdueto
ourdiscoveryofmeansofeconomisingtheuseoflabour
outrunningthepaceatwhichwecanfindnewusesforla-
bour.
*
Keynesrecognizedthat,in1930,technologicalunem-
ploymentwouldbeatemporaryphenomenonandthatthe
economywouldeventuallyabsorbtheexcessworkers.The
mainthrustofhisessaywastoattempttolookmuchfur-
*
Today,wheneconomistsdiscussthecausesoftheGreatDepression,
they tend tofocusalmostexclusively on themonetary policyofthe
FederalReserve.Whilethereislittledoublethattheoverlyrestrictive
policies of the Fed prolonged the Depression and perhaps turned a
runofthemillrecessionintoadisaster,itshouldnotbeforgottenthat
therewasawidespreadbeliefatthetimethatthetechnologicalunem-
ployment(andtheresultingplungeinconsumerdemand)thatKeynes
spoke of played an important role. Even Albert Einstein expressed
thisopinionwhenaskedforhistakeonthecausesoftheDepression
duringavisittotheUnitedStatesin1933.
THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 190
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
ther into the future. Keynes argued that over the next
hundred years (in other words, by the year 2030), the
economiesofdevelopednationswouldgrowdramatically.
Heshowedthat,overtime,economicgrowthwouldoper-
ate much like compound interest in a bankaccount and
make thesocietyofthefuture farmore wealthy.Keynes
hadaveryoptimistic viewofthelong-termfuture;some
wouldarguehewasunrealistic.Hebelievedthathumanity
was “solving its economic problem” and that the future
wouldbeoneofrelativeabundance.
Keynes also foresaw clearly that future technologies
would result in less need for human labor. He believed
thatwewouldenteranew“ageofleisure”andheworried
thatwemightstruggletofindpurposeinaworldthatdid
notrequirework.Importantly,healsoforesawtheneedto
sharewhateverworkwasrequiredacrossthepopulation:
…weshallendeavortospreadthebreadthinonthebut-
ter—tomakewhatworkthereisstilltobedonetobeas
widely shared as possible. Three-hour shifts or a fifteen
hourworkweekmayputofftheproblem[the“problem”
being a lack or purpose oractivity to occupy time]fora
greatwhile.
InevaluatingKeynes’essay,weshouldkeepinmind
thatattemptingtopredicteventsahundredyearsintothe
futureisaremarkablyambitiousundertaking.Whatecon-
omist(orstockmarkettrader)todayiscapableofpredict-
ing thestatusof theeconomyevensix months out with
anyconfidence? Personally, I think that Keynes’ take on
thefuturewasinmanywaysremarkablyprescient.Inpar-
Transition / 191
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
ticular,Ithinkhisviewthattechnologicalprogresswould
be relentless and would ultimately reduce the need for
humanlaborisverylikelytobevindicatedinthecoming
years and decades.His view of how we would go about
sharingtheworkisalsoessentiallycorrect,butabitmore
problematicintermsofhowitwillevolve.Asapractical
matter,Ithinkthereareafewobservationswecanmake.
First,lefttoitsowndevices,the free marketisvery
unlikely to produce a viable system in which work is
sharedequitably.Employing(andtraining)multiplepeople
toperformajobthatcouldinsteadbedonebyoneperson
placesanexcessburdenonbusinesses.Theywillnottake
onthatburdenvoluntarily.Governmentregulationwillbe
required to make it happen. Where businesses do today
hire part time workers, they often do so in an effort to
avoidregulationorpayingforbenefits.Asecondobvious
problem is that the wages from part time work will not
provide anything approaching an adequate income for
workers. In today’s economy, part time workers often
havetostringtogethermultiplejobsinordertoearnaliv-
ingwage.
Ingeneral,Ithinkthreebasicthingswillberequired
forustomovetoaneffectivetransitionaleconomyandto
begintorealizethevision thatKeyneswroteofin1930:
(1) We will need the government to enforce a work-
sharingscheme.(2)Weneedtodecouplehealthcareand
other social safety nets from employment, and (3) We
need to supplement employment income with direct in-
comestreams—andIhavearguedstronglythatthesein-
comestreamsshouldbeunequalandbasedonincentives.
THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 192
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
Theseincentives—particularlyafocusoncontinuingedu-
cation—will offer at least a partial solution to the prob-
lemsofalackofpurposeandanexcessoffreetimethat
Keynesforesaw.
Transition in the Tunnel
Let’snowreturntoourtunnelandrewindthesimulation
tothe pointatwhichautomationstartstotakehold.We
canthenseehowourtransitionalstrategymightwork.
*****
Wearebackinourtunnel.Verygradually,justasbe-
fore,webegintoautomatethejobsheldbymanyofthe
averagelights. Asthis happens,the impacted lightsgrow
dimmerandinmanycasesdisappearcompletely.
Now,however,wenoticesomethingnewinthetun-
nel.Agreenlighthasappeared.Aswewatchclosely,wesee
thatmanymorelightsgraduallybegintoshiftinhue.The
intensity of the lights remains unchanged, but the color
rotatesbetweenwhiteandgreen.Somelightsrotaterapid-
lybetween greenandwhite light,whileothersshifttheir
colormuchmoreslowly.
Thegreenlight,ofcourse,representsthepurchasing
power of consumers who are supported by incentive-
based income streams rather than traditional jobs. The
lightsrotateincolorasjobsaresharedamongtheworkers
firstaffectedbyautomation.
Thegreenlightsinitiallyrepresentasmallminorityof
the lights within the tunnel. Most peoplecontinue to be
employedintraditionaljobs.Ifweweretowatchtheac-
tioninthetunnelovertime,however,wewouldseethat
Transition / 193
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
thenumberofgreenlightsisconstantlyincreasing.Like-
wise,ifweweretofocusonanyonelight,wewouldsee
that,asitrotatesbetweenwhiteandgreen,thegreenlight
graduallycomestopredominate.
While the color rotation among the lights captures
ourinterestforatime,themoststrikingrealizationisthat
nothingelsehaschangedinthetunnel.Aswewatch,we
seethatthelightscontinuetosoftlyimpactthepanelson
the walls of the tunnel as consumers purchase products
and services. The businesses in the tunnel make no dis-
tinctionsbasedonthecolorofthelights.Overtime,the
processofcreativedestructioncontinuesjustasit always
has.Inefficientbusinessesfailandnewonesriseuptotake
theirplace.
Amongthemultitudeoflightsinthetunnel,we can
see that there are still a significant minority which shine
withintensewhitelight.Thewealthiestpeopleinthetun-
nelmaybesubjecttosomewhathighertaxrates,butthe
businessesandassetstheyownareretainingtheirvalueas
themassmarketcontinuestothrive.
Overall, we sense that stability has returned to the
tunnel. As the collective light that permeates the tunnel
graduallyshiftsfromwhitetogreen,wecanalsosensethat
itisonceagainincreasinginoverallintensity.Evenasjobs
arerelentlesslyautomatedaway,thelogicofthefreemar-
ket has been successfully leveraged to once again drive
sustainedprosperity.
CopyrightedMaterial–
Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
Chapter 5
THE GREEN LIGHT
In the previous chapter, I proposed a mechanism for
adapting the market economy so that it can continue to
function even as machine automation inexorably elimi-
natesthejobsthatprovideincometoconsumers.Thees-
sentialideaisthatweshouldimposesomecombinationof
aconsumptiontaxand/oraspecialdirecttaxonbusiness
thatcapturestheincomewhich,inanon-automatedecon-
omy,wouldbepaidoutinwages.Overtime,asthewages
paidtoaverageworkersdecrease(asapercentageofreve-
nue),thesetaxeswouldbegraduallyincreasedtorecapture
atleastaportionofthisincome.Theoverallobjectiveisto
recapturejusttheoptimalamountofincomeandthenget
itintothehandsofconsumerssothattherewillbesuffi-
cientconsumerdemandtocontinuedrivingtheeconomy.
Once the income has been collected, I then argued
that it should be directed to individual consumers based
on incentives. If, in the future, most human labor will
someday be unnecessary, then it follows that the private
sector willnot bewillingto pay forit. Ifwe cannot pay
peopletowork,thenwemustpaythemtodosomething
elsethathasvalue.AsIpointedoutinthepreviouschap-
The Green Light / 195
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
ter, we can construct a number of incentives which will
drive people to act in ways that benefit themselves and
society, and which help to protect the environment. By
offeringunequalincentive-basedincometoconsumers,we
notonlysustainconsumerdemand,butalsodrivepeople
toactinwaysthatbenefitusallandprovideeachperson
withthepossibility ofadvancement anda higherincome
inthefuture.
Thishopeforthefuture—theideathatbystrivingto
completegoalsonecanattainabetterstandardofliving—
iscriticaltoboth individualandcollectivestability.It of-
fersawaytoavoidtheenormousproblemofaneverin-
creasing, impoverished, disenfranchised and unmotivated
underclass.Aswesaw,theincentive-basedincomescheme
can be combined with a job rotation or sharing plan so
that as automation progresses, the remaining work is
sharedonareasonablyequitablebasisamongthepopula-
tion.
Inthischapter,wearegoingtousesomeimagination
andpushforwardevenfurtherintothefuture.Let’ssup-
posethatourtransitionhasbeenunderwayforsometime
in the major industrialized and emerging economies.
Thingshaveprogressedtothepointwherethemajorityof
people inthe developed world no longerwork full time.
Mostconsumersnowreceiveasubstantialportionoftheir
income from incentive-based income streams. Based on
theirparticularinterestsandabilities,peoplepursuehigher
education,workinthecommunityandmakechoicesthat
benefittheenvironmentwiththeunderstandingthatdoing
thesethingswillleadtoahigherincomeandabetterstan-
THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 196
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
dardofliving.Averagepeoplehavesufficientincome,and
sufficientconfidenceinthefuture,sothatbothconsumer
spendingand overall economicactivityconsistently grow
overtime.
While most peoplework only part time, or in some
casesnotatall,asignificantminoritycontinuestopursuea
fulltimecareer.Somemaystillfindemploymentinspecif-
icareaswheretherecontinuestobeneed.Authors,artists,
and entertainerswillstillbe accorded the opportunity to
derive substantial income from their talents. And, of
course,therearestillpeoplewhohavethenecessaryskills
andabilitytostartsuccessfulbusinessesandengagedirect-
ly in innovation. Because the transition has successfully
preserved a robust consumer market, those with the ap-
propriate talent and ambition still have the potential to
becomewealthy.Infact,itislikelythatmuchofthetradi-
tionalworknowperformedbypeopleisentrepreneurialin
nature.Many peoplemay choose to engage in profitable
hobbies or part time businesses that augment their in-
come.
Prosperity has been preserved in the developed and
emergingeconomies.Ournexttaskistothinkabouthow
thisnewsystemmightbeextendedtothepoorestregions
oftheworld.
Attacking Poverty
Mostofusunderstandthatthereisabasicinequityinthe
fact that the vast majority of the world’s wealth resides
with a relatively small fraction of its population, and we
realizethatthisinequalityisanimportantfactorthatoften
The Green Light / 197
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
underliesconflict,terrorism,andgeneralpoliticalinstabili-
ty. Economists have tried for decades to come up with
strategies that might help developing nations climb the
ladder of prosperity. Relatively few of these efforts have
achievedanysubstantialdegreeofsuccess.
Partly,thereasonisthatfiguringouthowtoinvestin
adevelopingcountryinsuchawayastoensurethatthe
investment results in sustained growth is extraordinarily
difficult. A common problem is, of course, corruption
amongofficialsinthecountry.Thesepeopleveryoftenact
primarilyfortheirownbenefit—and,inparticular,inways
that preserve theirpositions and power—rather thanfor
thebenefitoftheircountryasawhole.Inthefinalanaly-
sis, it comes down to individual incentives. People are
primarilymotivatedtodothingsthattheyarepaidtodo.
Makinganarmslengthinvestmentinacountryandsome-
howinsuringthatthatinvestmentcreatesappropriateand
sustainable incentives throughout the economy is an ex-
traordinarychallenge.
54
Asecondissuewefaceinconfrontingpovertyisthe
environmentalimpactthatitimplies.Ifwelookatarapid-
ly developing county, such as China, it quickly becomes
apparentthataddressingpovertybyapplying thenormal,
historicalpathtoindustrializationthroughoutthepoorest
regions of the world could well result inglobal catastro-
phe.Theearthis simplynot equippedto support untold
billions of people who begin to utilize energy and other
resources at levels typical for the major industrialized
economies.
THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 198
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
Inthischapter,Iamgoingtoarguethat,inalargely
automatedeconomy,itshouldbepossibletoattackpover-
tysimplybygradually extendingincentive-basedincomes
to people in developing countries. The payments would
start outrelatively low andthe incentives would strongly
emphasize environmental considerations. By paying
peopledirectlytoconserveresourcesandprotecttheenvi-
ronment,itshouldbepossibletomovetowarddecoupling
economicprosperityfromnegativeecologicalimpact.
Clearly,suchasinitiativewouldrequireahighdegree
of international cooperation and probably the formation
ofanagencythatwouldimposestandardsandhelpdesign
income incentives for individual countries. It is possible
that some governments would initially refuse to partici-
pate.Overtime,however,iftheapproachprovedsuccess-
ful, it seems likely that the populations of nearly every
countrywoulddemandparticipation.
Once again, we are likely to run into the “paying
people for nothing” psychological stumbling block. The
initial reaction of many people would probably be that
such a scheme would be highly inflationary. To see that
this would not necessarily be the case, let’s start with a
somewhatsimplisticanalysisofwhysuchaschemewould
notworkinourcurrenteconomy.
Imaginethat,intoday’sworld,wesimplystartedpro-
vidingincomestolargenumbersofimpoverishedpeople
throughout the world. We might borrow the money for
this,orsimplyhavegovernmentsprintit.Oncethemoney
founditswayintothehandsofthesepeople,theywould,
ofcourse,starttospendit.Businessesbothlocallyandin
The Green Light / 199
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
other countries would try to ramp up to meet this new
demand. They would have to find and hire workers for
this.Wecaneasilyimaginethatshortagesofskilledwork-
ers might develop and that wages would therefore in-
crease. In short, the economy’s ability to produce real
goodsandserviceswouldnotbeabletokeepupwithall
thenewmoneynowinthehandsofconsumers.There-
sult,ofcourse,wouldbeinflation:thevalueofallthisnew
moneywouldfall,andpricesandinterestrateswouldin-
crease,perhapsdramatically.
But what if the entire economy were highly auto-
mated? Then, no new workers would need to be hired,
and there would be few if any labor shortages. There
wouldbeaneedforadditionalcapitalinvestmentintech-
nologytomeetthenewdemand,butthiswouldbeagood
investmentthat would continueto payoffoverthe long
term.Wecannotsaythatalltheconstraintsthatmightlead
toinflationwouldberemovedbecausetheremightstillbe
shortagesofenergyorresources.However,suchshortages
are not specific to this approach—in other words, if we
attemptedtoaddresspovertybythetraditionalmethodof
building up industry and creating jobs, natural resource
andenergyconstraintswouldstillcomeintoplay.
Moneyhasvalueonlybecauseitcanbeexchangedfor
real products and services. In our current economy, it
takesagreatdealofhumanlabortoproducethoseprod-
uctsandservices.Therefore,itisfairtosaythatthevalue
ofmoneyistiedverycloselytoproductivity,orthegeneral
efficiency of production. If in fact, the economy of the
futureishighlyautomatedandrequiresfewworkers,then
THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 200
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
wecanimaginethatitmaywellbepossibleto achieve a
level of economic efficiency that is far beyond what is
possible today.
*
Furthermore, an automated economy
seemslikelytobehighlyscalable:inotherwords,itwould
bemucheasiertorapidlyandsmoothlyrampupproduc-
tioninordertomeetincreaseddemand.
Ibelievethatitmaysomedaybepossibletoleverage
thevastlyincreasedproductionefficiencyofanautomated
economytoaddresstheissueofglobalpoverty.Aslongas
incomes were provided in a gradual fashion so that any
inflationaryeffectscouldbecontrolled,andaslongasin-
dividual incomes were tied to incentives that helped ad-
dress environmental impact and resource constraints, it
should conceptually be possible to eventually eliminate
poverty.Additionally,Ithinkitmaybepossibletocreatea
“virtuouscycle”inwhichbillionsofnewlyviableconsum-
erswouldeventuallydriveglobaleconomicoutputtoun-
imaginablelevelsbycreatingmarketsofstaggeringsizefor
newproductsandservices.
Manypeoplewill,ofcourse,feelthatallthisis pure
fantasy.Obviously,thisis notanideathatisgoingtobe
feasibleinthenearfuture,anditclearlycouldnotoccurat
allifwedon’tfindawaytonavigatethroughthetransition
*
Additionally,wecanspeculatethatifproductionefficiencyreached
unprecedentedheightsasautomationinvadedtheeconomy,wewould
alsoneedamuchmorerelaxedmonetarypolicythaniscurrentlythe
case.Centralbankswouldprobablyhavetoallowthemoneysupplyto
expand at a rapid rate relative to historical norms, or production
would be needlessly constrained. This is a very strong argument
against theidea (asproposedbysome extremeLibertarians)thatwe
shouldreturntothegoldstandard.
The Green Light / 201
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
that I discussed in the previous chapter. Nonetheless, I
wouldarguethatthislieswithintherealmoffuturepossi-
bility—perhapsevenbyourcutoffdateof2089.Toflesh
this ideaout alittlefurther,let’suseevenmoreimagina-
tion and consider the possible economic implications of
truly advanced technologies that might conceivably be
availableinthedistantfuture.
Fundamental Economic Constraints
Giventhefactthatwehavebillionsofpeoplewhoallde-
sire material things,whydoesn’t global economic output
simply soar toward infinity? Obviously, there are things
that limit production. Let’smakealistofthemostbasic
factorsthatacttoconstraineconomicactivity:
1. Labor
Intoday’seconomy,humanlaborisrequiredtosomede-
greeintheproductionofnearlyeverything.Theavailabili-
tyofworkers,thecostofemployingthemandthespecific
skillsthattheypossessisanimportantconstraintoneco-
nomicoutput.Obviously,thepointofthisbookhasbeen
thatthisconstraintislikelytobecomefarlessimportantas
automationtechnologyprogresses.
2. Energy, Land, Natural Resources and Environ-
mental Impact
Clearly, production is constrained by the availability of
energyandoftherawmaterials,suitableland,water,and
other resources that are required to create products and
services.Additionally,economicactivitywillultimatelybe
limited by the harmfuleffectsit perpetratesonthe envi-
THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 202
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
ronment:includingtoxicpollution,overuseofpublicre-
sources, and, of course, the climate change effects asso-
ciated with the emission of carbon dioxide and other
greenhousegasses.
3. Technology
Productionisalsolimitedbythesophisticationofthema-
chines,processesandtechniquesthatareavailable.Ihave
arguedherethat,astechnologyadvances,itwillultimately
becomeindependentoflabor.Machineswillevolvetothe
pointwheretheyarenolongertoolsusedbyworkers,but
insteadautonomousproducers.
4. Consumer Demand
Viable consumer demand is also an absolute limiter of
productioninthefreemarketeconomy.Weare,ofcourse,
speaking here of demand in the economic sense, which
meansdesireforaproductorservicecombinedwiththe
abilityandwillingnesstopayforit.Nobusinesswillinvest
in production unless there is either existing market de-
mandorthereasonableexpectationofsuchdemandinthe
foreseeablefuture. The idea that productionrespondsto
demandisoneofthedefiningcharacteristicsofcapitalism.
Removing the Constraints
Now thatwe’ve listed the fourbasic constraints onpro-
duction let’s perform a thought experiment and imagine
howthoseconstraintsmightconceivablyfallinthedistant
futureiftechnologycontinuestorelentlesslyadvance.The
pointissimplytoimaginewhichconstraintscouldpoten-
The Green Light / 203
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
tiallybeeliminatedorminimizedastechnologyprogresses
overdecadesandevencenturies.
Themainthesisofthisbookhasbeenthat,eventually,
machines will become autonomous and there will be far
lessneedforhumanlabor.Therefore,let’sgo aheadand
removelaborasaconstraint.Ourlistnowlookslikethis:
1. Energy,Land,NaturalResourcesandEnviron-
mentalImpact
2. Technology
3. ConsumerDemand
Next,let’simaginethatadvancednanotechnologyand
newcleanenergytechnologiesbecomeavailable.Perhaps
wemanagetoderivenearlylimitlessenergyfromthesun
orfromnuclearfusion.Thecostofenergy,aswellasits
negative impact on the environment, fall to a near zero
level.Nanotechnologyallowsustoeasilytransformmatter
atthemolecularlevel.Wecaninexpensivelyconstructad-
vancedmaterialsfrommorebasiccomponentsandrecycle
usedandwasteproductsintousablerawmaterials.Envi-
ronmental policies and incentives have effectively mini-
mizedothernegativeimpactsthatresultfromproduction.
Wecanthenreduceourlistofeconomicconstraintsas
follows:
1. Technology
2. ConsumerDemand
Now imagine that, in the absence of resource con-
straints, technology continues its relentless advance and
THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 204
CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon
ultimately accelerates to the point where new processes
and machines can be conceived and constructed almost
effortlessly. Technology, much like energy, becomes un-
iversallyavailableandvirtuallyfree.
Ourlistcannowbereducedtoasingleline:
1. ConsumerDemand
Andnowwemuststop.Consumerdemandasacon-
straintisfundamentaltothearchitectureofthefreemar-
ketsystem.Ifweeliminatethisconstraint—ifproduction
occursinresponsetosomethingotherthandemandfrom
consumers who have the ability to pay for the products
andservicesproduced—thenwenolongerhaveamarket
economy.
Obviously, this exercise has been purely imaginary.
While it might be centuries before technology advances
sufficiently to actually remove these constraints, we can
reasonablyexpectthat,overtime,technologywillgradual-
lyacttoreducethem.Bythinkingaboutwhichconstraints
couldpossiblybeeliminatedfarinthefuture,wecanbe-
gintoseewhatistrulyimportant.Eachoftheconstraints
couldconceivablybereduced,orperhapseveneliminated,
exceptconsumerdemand.
The Evolution toward Consumption
Historically,theprimaryeconomiccontributionof anin-
dividual has been his or her work. Our economic rules
emphasizeproductionbecauseprosperityhasalwaysbeen
heavily dependent on human labor. The incentives built
into the market economy reflect this historical reality.