DESIGN NOTES
FOR
STATE ROUTE 45 (OLD HICKORY BLVD.) OVER 1-65
DAVIDSON
COUNTY
BRIDGE ID NUMBER: 19100650081
FEDERAL. PROJECT NUMBER: IM-65-3(108)
STATE CONSTRUCTION NUMBER: 19012-3154-44
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT NUMBER: A049
DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS: LRFD (2004, 3
SPANS:
EDITION)
165'0” ~ 168'0”
OUT TO OUT WIDTH:
860”
WELDED STEEL PLATE GIRDER
BEAM SPACING:
BRIDGE RAIL:
(54" WEB)
10”
STD-1-1
Date: August 24, 2004
DESIGNED BY:
TENNESSEE
WHP
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION STRUCTURES DIRECTOR:
EDWARD P. WASSERMAN
INDEX OF SHEETS
SUBJECT
Preliminary Design, vertical clearance
and bridge length
SHEET NUMBERS
1 thru 6
Preliminary loadings , Live Load Distribution factors,
And Prel. Plate Girder Sizes, cut-offs, and Design moments and shears------- 7 thru 44
Concrete Slab Design
45 thru 49
Positive Moment Girder Design
50 thru 61
Negative Moment Girder Design
62 thru 78
Flange Lateral Bending Stresses
79 thru 81
Constructibility
82 thru 96
Service Limit State Check
97 thru 98
Fatigue Design
99 thru 102
Shear Design (Stiffener Spacing)
103 thru 106
Shear Connector Design
107 thru 109
Transverse Intermediate Stiffeners, Bearing Stiffeners,
and Cross-frame Stiffener Design
110 thru 112
Bolted Field Splice Design
113 thru 127
Detailed Bridge Plans
Appendix A
|
j
1002
ALNNOD _NOSQIAVGa
Ob b6+EZ NOILVIS
XXXX 'ON 'Œ1
Tse,
NOTLY1MƠJGNYMI,
LN3N18Yd30
© vis
20
Sb 3inow Sivis
390108
"....
|
i
a 334$ N91S30
43dYuYd IeI-G1S HIIA LYAOYOL 0-r8
đ 10Y 1202
+
PBS
|
\
oS
â 2142/0171 3SYNg
0k2 =.0.2i B SGANY| ế
oO
„Ê»,Py = NI. XMTSNOO Ï SSYHd
a
be
ee
'+UP9
—
—
ee
bị
„Ð-.£
i
ro
.
1}
|
ns
Geely & OLSSVEL DF ZSYNg
Đ~.y x NG2MISNGOT SSYHd
i
~0-, "0,2 8 SANVT|
mend
oo+sz
1
GS
0A1
`
M
3
đ
t
\
Tell
+
wm
(ABAYUNS
NO
OYWMYOS
DNINOO)
x2
NOI123S TY2T4AL
(^1
,
-
osecz
|
oT
4
L
200
~
N
:
5
.
9Z°Lr9 =— 'Vz
30t-2L+22 VIS
390108
4Ð 2NIN939—/
=
|
|
ing 2.
Ww
I
:
#
taR
$
inane
i-1-Q1s
ws
"|
--
(AAO 7.9 04 2
ave fd NDA
"!8Y OL SEENY
1834016FZ
.t
29 ST
Shee aH
(OOZ1
32yos
-(Q0Z1_31v2S)
NOILVAS3 doc;
eat
ˆ
ở
9M11SDC3 31WPIXOHddY
suns
“0A7G
AUONIOTH
M0
>114
ABAUNS 9
`—
_Ь
_tW; zựO
Lain
80-81 8 SVT SOS
OD
We
An
va
t
Ẳ
‘=“
oJ) 691
ev
Xu
S9-I
A3A
y3
HOEEE3I0MEGAVV
,0=,Yễ vu.0<,ETĐS3NY) SALONSO IZ¥
]
3.00 3 ..9-.TTOSENYT ở£ °S3L0N30
TY
+
=
ans |
w
W
FOS
rite
et
8S.
WO
pot
Ta]
sa Đen
G150 317807 2Mng
a)
LPSOtt2viS
anes
sera
7Ã
RoE
x
vie |
Q
(HAm dỌL
gle uf
dob aS
Fs-pP
oP
ip
SUVDION S3NIT GBHSYO
| whl
$9-1 15'0f+d9y *Y1S
AUOXOIH ƠM 02°P6+tt YLS
"0A3%_ LUOXOIH 0Ô
L2442
La
MNS
ZF Lbg » cad /
Ov"
TH
si Ị
W
2WNWVZE TOiLU3A MNMINDY 4Ô LNOd
18-91
201-,8{= sOBUINOSY
"YTU2Y
SONVUVSO TYOLLV3A PPUMD 40 LNIOd
—-
ade
5
\
\
{
l\
\-§$-a----~----- 2~-~~~~~~———~
ỳ
4
rrrrzrrrrr rrr
39-1 07/909 v6
99'Sr9 = “T3 "903
Osesz
X2320 31312M02 'SNY2-ì 313 2MGO
NYS +
2 WOLUSOd USIRVE NVICIN STBVLUOd (LYHOCI S3|0N3G sẽ
T NOLLISOd UBRUYE NYICRN JIGV1UOd AUYWOUTEL *S3LONBO ©
ONY “SLNBMLLNGY 9
29.24 ZL SE
“SAN36 ONY SINPLLIGY LV JTI0Ud THIS NO ORSYS 30 TIVHS NÓ[LYAY2X3 (2T
“IZALS SMDIFHLV3a 3G OL SI 7331S WwunLomUs Tat
19081) 31THa Œ3LNIYd
3M 0L 2V HOEN “134YYd 3O dO) ONY 32Y4 2XISMI 1432X3 SS2YZW1S
31
NQ2 TY H2 (09C A39) NIVINTOM 38 01 ONLLYOO SUNLGL (Ot
HAI
X3 C4 ƠVý GV G5WNSYA 3E >$¿ GỐ35ˆ30-60/
NOLLXHISNGÓ AYROYOM
200108
GY 0X MO4 SMOIIYOI4i23dSTìne
GUYDMY1S SHI 30 602 NộL1235
49 §UMGĐITSM
3Ú 132
ATDrUOdINT Mĩ .ÿ 0ì.3
3 TÍYHS NOLLISLOUd 340%3W MO4GAƠYMO
dYt-dĩJ 02 QHOYH T71
tdYu-di GINDOYH (6
'SOLIVOI41234S 0WYONYVLS 3U 4° CTrot 712':vy
MỊ .. BLON KLIN SOMVOMOSIV
ME SE Ol MOINES Sor suis MUad DG (Œ
LNSPLLHYd30 23553 (3)
TYM3N39
%ssz
13dYtrYd I-1-015 3ST
S XJ230
conSOR! 1UOXOH G1)
31190292 ONY SLN38 15Ód Y HUIA (Q382t -?6)
M3GMID313⁄2NG)
3y
CBOE “BLS SIOYMIINO) MVdS Z 40 1SISNỢO
TIYHS 31121531 (9
‘3 ony
'SMOLLY914133dS GUYONY1S
3H JO 106 ONY F09 HOIL23S 335 3SÌAUSUO
GAIỊN
2Ĩ
SST 9 BOVE ST9Y PUSY 39 TIVES “ERIS SNIIWOINISY (S
TẾ 000y + 0,2 ",0, SSYT) XO3XI 390106
Wd COOL
= 04 12V SSYT
36 01 /2LSDNGO (
“S00 INIT I909 WOLLYET TROY HS .V,
1M093LY9
ZVTOjM34
'S220188 AYEHOIH 4Ó KOIS2Q
JPSISS
SNOLIYOII23đ$ QMYOMIS2INSI3)
3U
SPUOTTOML YONBOGY HALIM NOLLICR S661MO3 OLNSYY
ISNOLLVOISTO3GS NOISO (C
CAYTRGAO 3MWĨ1714 003 :L4⁄/81 Cí 3JTEOMI 0¡ SOVOT OY20 “bb-OZSH PONIOVOT
WZ
%XNOILIJ3 S6E1"T HOIYTD NOILYLUOVSNYUL
SSL0N
BAL 30 SMGLIY314072d5 220186 GMY 0YOU OMVOMYIS PSNQI(V2I123đ5
————
\
30'95+SZ VIS
220106 40 ONG
HOt
"COO
COUNTY: LewiclS&¥)
Thre
lb idge
es, noe
Bridge No.1
zo"
Nome
2n"
(19- mc “e% told 14
Pit
Ba
2.
5 Lancs œ12 0" z œ©@'Q '/
aie
<<
Gurvey
a Fey, 2.92
4o"
H
Tera@
+
NOTES
2 Fetaining vals
ec" c9
tT
với.
sce Be
ŒtcìcvS
Old Wickow
Typicaksechion
vote
ie
CROSSING: FoR
N'2" = -ra'2"
WR
Srew)
®ea*t
_ l€ oi
Peay
=
I
HR:
°3 Go's! '87" =
cees
N*48\S"e
. 31"
Øhc¿Ð 4s T6, 337 °
section CI-6S)
'úPpicak
IZ’o"gnoulder~ 12'0" Ramp-
AE D23 934
PP
.|.Êl9È, 64B.86||
|: chon
2Lanes@ 120"- 3ianes@ 116" Fo"medion-7
Blanes eG" ~ Ztanes@ Zo" - Za" Ramp -12'o"shouder
:PVIƑ 243438.0
:¡'::|:Heý
cot
65.44
YC (one)
PI.
fete
fs = + fe
4-3: BELES(
Cle . 664,44
PC: 20488,00
UTH PHONE LENES Sa =k
ng tí
J:IN BE Q ONOUT-T- - T=
3 -AT TACHED: T6 |B81 DỆE
tài
2443.00
ev:
419.44
SE taœ
Sta 24 + 93,34 NC
Bed trans
L
PIs 27+ 88,00
Sia 29+ 43.34
Gls +2.50 4%
GZ’ -4,.23%
InkrsccHi
(Q:.07 0)
AN
+ 634,69
VEL: oo. 00
Đìm%X
ye
bE
a
Por.
2344.37)
ond
460+ 34.507 I-65
U2 1124 2102) 4510.9) #9
DIN
Me .337
X= 44.679"
DESIGNIDATE
=o
= =
Ea
Suh
=1
ẪN
=
oe ‘
_—
dua
ee
oo FFG Sue)
CHECK
|DATE
CHECK
|DATE
PAGE
***x*x
Bridge
Length
JOB DESCRIPTION...OHB
p.c.
Station
.
.
.
Program
Input
Data
****
/ I-65
6.
6
ôâ
6
â
cv
cu
cu
ew
ew
20.8800
E . Elevation...
..
ee
ee
eae
645.490
Grade
1
ô6
6
ew
ew
ww
we
ees
2.560
Grade
2
2.
2.
2.
ew
we
Length
of
ww
6
6
6
vertical
.
.
curve
.
2.
â
ew
in
Skew
angle
6
2
ee
Left
slope...
..
.
.
2.
Left
slope
break
station
Left
slope
break
elevation
station.
Right
slope
break
elevation.
slope
intersection
Structure
depth
Bearing
ôâ
depths
Program
depth
width
of
bridge
bridge
2,00
.
.
2.00
25.0760
used
619.030
Data
****
25.6450
in
calculations
4.4.4.4...
4.4...
****
4...
9,50
+...
1,500
inches
0.250
inches
............
.
Abutment
ô
......4.-.
point.
width
depth.
ôâ
76.3370
22.2088
Berm
Abutment
â
ew
.........
..........
.....
ôâ
..
.........
device
we
Output
point
........
depth
ew
7.00
......
depth
of
ôâ
...
.......
Beam
3eginning
tnd
Length
intersection
slope
Filler
ôâ
74.230
618.7300
break
Slab
ew
ww
.......
slope
we RK
we
..........4.
Bridge
ew
22.8120
Right
Rignt
ww
........
slope
Left
ew
stations
6
Right
****x
ew
2.
ô6
ôâ
4...
â
ôâ
ôâ
ôâ
...........
...........
.
..
ôâ
ằ
ôâ
-
63.000
ô6
64.000
feet
#3.000
feet
3.000
feet
4...
4...
inches
.
inches
.........
.
Station
2232.5857
............
.
Station
2552.7937
Copyright
1989
Region
IV
Software
VERTICAL
CURVE
-
VERSION
1.0
-
04/13/88
Old Hickory Blvd.
over I-65
STATION Station 23+94.397
Pavidson
a
COUNTY
‘URED
BY
whp
STA.
EL.
=
=
20.88000
645.490
PC
PC
Gl
G2
v
K
DATE
03-15-2001
2.56000
~4.23000
7.00000
-0.48500
STA.
22.32586
FG.
EL.
=
648.177
"of
STA.
23.81772
FG.
EL.
=
648.825
fant3
STA.
23.94397
FG.
EL.
=
648.781
¢@Pet
STA.
24.26024
FG.
EL.
=
648.602
owt+
STA.
25.52794
FG.
EL.
=
646.911
Fos
STA.
27.88000
FG.
EL.
=
639.645
TY
CB Aaa ie, > 0.0OF
IPVeemna = 2.013
GA.
COUNTY: Davicksgt CROSSING: Mi astgesg tow ek ¬
"Scdse ce
tr 3%
hi
NOTES
Min yerr Clearance
}
ON!
Ske
234+94,397(SP + (Behan) 2 2543)02
IGS:
Stee
ADE
At
AS,825 - 5.08(0,02)= 648,043
eley
Np
Pe
rs
Stucke
8 007 + (Mm nan) - GF” Hane gn) = 400+73502
depth.
=
A8,.O¥3-624.0
Point
OMB! Sta 2B+A4 IIe
-)b,S
=
1943
(GY?) 4(BM. cea reared
eley 648.602 TƯ,
oaC47, B20
Sta 46043850)+ (O49
a 977) + (4-54!
331}
©c©w
24/2
„
)
Zemes)
eB Supe
brvchre clei = A).42-(24.2-Kc.Š+
J-GS:
PPX,
ớ
Ori
ox, Grice
OWB!
ai,
in
OMG:
4004 38.507 ~ (68:5
;
4¿O+893.4%+
3
7,2 $4
HS?
23494,397- 94.679- 18,52)
TOS}
tx
22+ 81.19)
VY pan 37) = 40+ 14,563
GLAS - ( 3011,5
~ 24 00%)
)0.
0%)
- 12(0.04)3,.0 =
23+99,397 + 44.679 419.52) =
@iÐ.n3
295407,59)
TGS: 40439 567+ (68,9430
Aan 16.53)
) = 460 +62 .95|
@rey ! ©25.G- ($150.02) 24 (61625 12.(0104)- 3.0 = 14..63
span kensths:
‘TOR Stew
22+32,23242
.5859
3
EG
wm
⁄2©+S©“22,
Ter Sten Z2)
S%%n4đìz
S0
M2
feaucc€) S%per-%xrucfUr€ Ẵ&p+h=
=
amaunt Grade
z
a
“5
(MA
oe
~
. 27):
ủi
\%8.4°
đ2r|5r5⁄‡t3< GBin
9,667 $4-
canoe wered = 2112. -S.460 = 1,453!
DESIGNID4TE
CHECK
(DATE
CHECK
|O4ATE
PAGE
COUNTY:
OI
TDexidson
S682 'SIvet
CROSSING: Quer i
NOTES
3(12) $2.33 = 84
Wt2+S = 260"
fak.
Bar Co wplets
bolt b c7
rZ2/0/ eck
STO
gu" Ye
TT1I
4oo"
1⁄15 + 30/2)12.3
2582Q I2" <28 9*
= 401"
BS
Use Double
On
L
“
Yorn"
TT
hose Garg}
+
psn"
,
He wor hao
Ð/%scd/ SHuckÝt
DESIGNIDATE
CHECK
|DATE
CHECK
|DATE
PAGE
$9
ALNNOD
al
TOOZ
NOSOIAVG
JLVLSYSLNI
Y3SA0
See eat oN
CO REPTPa
NOLLVIUOdSNYUL 40 1N3LLMV430
» Œ33đ4$ H01530
434YWfd †1-01S HIIA AYRUYOH 0-58
© LOV 10S
2 NOLLISOd USDRYE NYIOII FIGV1NOd AUVUOEPEAL S3LONBG se
T WOLLISOd UGRRIVE NYIOIN TIGVLUOT AUYUOUMAL SBLONN «
tg
ma +
Sd ONY
Hh oe
\
--—-—
ee
\
nam
aaea
ma...
TY2L1M3A
00+5#
nO
3SOMYUYTĐ
CƯ.
sẽ. a4
390108 40 03
th
osesz
Ồ
Ỳ
“SINSG_iS0d $ 3LRONOD
ONY “SLNGHLLNGY BALLS 030 ALSUONDS “SPrYSE-1 31SYON0D
NS 95 STL STL 98S) NYdS P 4O SISISNQO 390100 ONLISIXG
te
(
“SLNGG ONY SUNGMLNGY LY ZT2OMd TYNI4 NO 035Y6 36 TÍYNS NOTLYAY2X3 (Z1
“31S 9NIHEHIYäR 36 01 SĨ T331 TYWUL2BIS TT MT
19091) 31IH8 GINIYd
3% 0L_ 3% HOIHA °13dYUYd 20 di ONV 32Y4 301SMI 1dZ7X3 S2OYĐấS
3L3NG) TIY O4 (00YSC) A309 NIYLNIOH 39 01 MONTLVOD SUNLXGL (OT
"NÓI G0220-6
NGII AYAOYON
0/
XAOMT O4 GiV4 OWV ŒHEESYSĐ 3 TWHS
ONY NOLLOMLLSNOD 3920101
2
sie
4 SOLVIT
, Ids (NVONVI
3U 9 S§ỐU NĨI
“SNOLLYDLSIOSGS GHYONY1S
106 ONY PO9 HOIL27S 135 '2SIASHIO 03I0N
TYH3N39
a¿4
02W) 1MOYXOIH 0XP EY us
4l TÍYHS NG1123i0M. 3901 BĨ4 dYt-diV GANHOYN lởYt- di GONHIOYVH (6
HL 30
“SHOLLYOISTO3ES GUVONYIS BLL 40 C7V09
MI ¿3 SUƠM HUỊS ZSMVOĐGOUP
RỊ 34 04 TENH3 SoY AI NO 31OLlUY
Stoo
13dYdYd EI-1LS 350
3132902
BLISOUNOD ONY ‘SINDG 150d k HIIR “03828YTS„vVS)3930
V309
SÌV 1M
GE0T34 TIS SIOTNLIMOO
NYdS Ở 20 ISISWOD TIVIS 2W112/MICVAgS
S3LON
CAYRGAO SULA HÓ4 s14/0T1 CC 2YTTONi 0L SOVOT GY3G*rr-0ESH *OMIOYOT (2
cc
ay
"0111 03 SEE1"EHUY) NOLLYLU0, jSMVML 40
13L Mvd30 33SS3WWN5:
3U. 20 9ILYSI2022đ5 SodDM 0V OY0U 4ÔGVONVIS
TULIPS a
24
iw
JH')SNGO.
QA
AVON
SOI IS eC+dey “Vis
OW 0t YE+t2 Y1S:
ŒO Jtˆ9O+rt'YLS
$#1 00£1309t IS
.._.)',
“CATE OKO
CsrtE
4Ð INiod
©
`.
trẻ
|
Winky
"
mỹ
Ak
=
vẽ
Mu
Ẳhà
=
“OA
33
OH
-0-,z2
bE
old
© DTD
a
™
t
„.
~
OL 10)
'S310N30
!S310N30
1S31ON3O
PSSLONAD
™
T
be
Ones
© SHNYTâ
~2
rm.
Toe
T
I
JT
ẹ~.T
+0Y't+zi
92119 xo
Board 30 ONT
+
7
$
i
as
IS.
| wap
|
et
.
(GLDORIAL ô8? 09 OL z
9NISYUO JT1401d 9NLLSIX3 NY
330 OF1VIS SYN S0 102 3Yu9
T—-—
eT
gan „ƑS HIỊA oe
.0-.99
1y
!CV
IV
IY
sọc;
SUIS
9WL1SDV3 3LYNIXOMddY
VAT H3
_fO071 33YyAS
NỔI
1K, 200
REST EST
OTH O10
ABAUNS 9
UNO
¡ 2MY1jNWU|
SOD”
OD
MG B00
SVT
-
osecze
S3IOTNOHS
NY1G3
0.42 = Oe ZTBSENV] ở
of ¥E = 9 TTBSINTT C
an
G
uo!
Pome
orb
t2y
Bia
ove dtd Cannon
[ee TP se
9-.PE "0-,ZTSAMY]
đ.#-.1T9S3WYT â*S310N30
S3LONG
TV
|
=
18V 0L SETONY
se Danes 97
Lanes |
lw) TTS
JNB3d0TS FZ
Wp
eee
¥
We
HN TRO =ế
a
2ZOMYAYVZL TGLIE3A HYNNI 30 Ltd
Ss
„Ũ†-,3Y
ø TYTUOV
HPƯNH
#
#0F'r6+Cở YIS
ties = 594d
Form
Ton waa" 3
CRIONTT
DESIGNED
CHECKED
45 (Old Hie)
TT
lean
BY DATE | P
1100 J. K. POLK OFFICE.
37213
Pro posed bac
ss
E
TENNESSEE
“
ng
{| SUBJECT
DATE
BY
“(8
LRIFD Design
7250*
TES
té
3360".
—
},If9TAL SRIDCE LENGTHY
125722
NASHVILLE.
——
reetta\
——
“
`
70° 2013"
ị =
>
H
Tt
Eˆ
omer
Ị
aa
Stub ‘Integral aleviments:
interscchon ©io-Hov) © 23194 40 bid Hickory ve!)
nt
COUNTY
2 (Fram Prem inowe, CalcodaHơ)
arr
MMos
OF
PAGE
Fixed - Pres
:
i
`
86'-0"" (OUT TO OUT)
STRUCTURES
reg |
sri —1)
PRAFỆT TT
p-o
2 LANES © 12°"2 24°-0" | 6-0", 6-0"| 2 LẠNES @ 12-0^+ 24-07
12°-9"
0"
|
`
truant ane Í
:
0.02 He .
heyteaser
“We Tor {Ị
đ wf
UIT
SOULE
eae]
[4
Tes
ỳ
|
1 eh 1-0" SO”
>
†
| WEB
|
h
22'-0”:
I
22'-0"
OF
Lư) 1
DỊ.”
CON COMPRES
€amnpos› ve:
Opprax. Read
e
ay
le-o'f
22-0”
17-0"
lào"
1-0”
cre)
[ire
rye)
N
Sở
ae i
Ae SESTION vex.
(8œ.o'X.n# ')(.'SO3⁄4 Gyders
L‡s-s-
=
=
2
2
nearing Surface :
Bridge tail:
*4/¢4)( 2? Cfhy (Or 150 hoe 2/8 Greeters = Ou
Grid, or Partially Filled
oe
Beams;
Concrete T-
&
~
Beams, T- and Double T-
Sections
TENNES
O34
3#pp,rd,5 §
led }eHO Hee = auth
`
yrcor
=
eat
Concicke
wu
Applicable
`
@s.
Range of
i,j
connected to
act as a unit
Applicabili
7
:
Two or More Design Lanes Loaded:
cos () (aI
9.5
L
K
12011
45
N, 2 4
8
0.2
3.6
< 16.0
12.0
20
12.0Lt3
L
14
Vo
K
00s „ Í -Š. 14/8192
.
-
k and also | One Design Lane Loaded:
if sufficiently
.
Becks
Distribution Factors
Cross-Section
04
ccle/
2 O45 K/ep “gicdef
lane for moment interigy” girder
0.6
T=4412
er il oe
4/FE eyeler
SH" x 6"
Vu -Girciey + Out Miragsedee
4.6.2.2.1-4
Grid on Steel or Concrete
|
| l2 "Sự
from Table
Concrete Deck, Filled
Gicder
(0.033 4/4
)( 8~ I1%6(2))/8 Grders = 0:34 "YL oieder
( Oe
inlerior Beoms
Type of Beams
¥
LZ) circles = Capprex:)
OG FS ‘Est ho"yg Bor fe. 1@"y 195" , aaub
2b
y
Slalo! 1,24 K/-l@weler
compe wetgnt =
ath 4.6, 22
“Ye
(a"XhS")
N44) (0.180) = _0, 03 “A Ginter
totaL
TơFd Non Co Cas:le weynhe
“rar
lì
AB 13a
Ae
.,32+./Ịz,4217% (40, Tưuệc Oross sectoral Onesyr: An 128) 4g x OAD (AS x
MOG aforre
Cross-frumes, splice lates, ad
.
Ÿ, Qwetew weisn Ff
bishb allowac <
eta’ Khen he
Go “ ay Y Og 4 /Éy Outer
oat
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Filer:
T-0”
i
aE
Wi fern laadis:
—]
_
fable
%
'4.@,2.2.2b `}
;
‘aay?
DESIGNED BY
DATE
S.
Sag
Tà
COUNTY
DATE
“CHECKED BY
DF___—
PAGE
ae TS
———=
An
Ke
ea
om
unt
an
~
wm
ha Span oF Bedin
(P+)
ty = clepth of Gnerete Sla
b wo
©
ome Lat
ta bad
ww
on
Cg = Sra
wu
ws
at
Ow
1100 J. K.
NASHVILLE
arf
ue
Merhea
of Bear;
lạ: 2(T+A€?)
ở3
“
E6= Modulus of clasticrihy of Beram a4
32: A86. 22723825
ary
6
-
na
Az arca of Girder
befeucen Canter
a
Ta
lee
£e+ Meodlus afelashiiky o8 cdecErna¿z
(4)
nz
=e, <9
Grder Inerha icolahy2⁄ (đelercacc he a‡ œna/eoPcocb,)
V2
Lư
Cc
“2D
Component
48x15"
Area
Bunge
54x 006" wel
—
WY
2aT141
hs2
-2788
- 818/22
222448
Mien”
L_
©
2
TD beam *
fae (SA (Ove) + Lỗi #250
Wy
TENNESSE “DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVES
one
o
“ZEEE
S)85O.&
Design Lane loadect:
($e) (oy) (ta
|
AMOF2 095 + { oh)
vn
“ee
“A
166) C5
‘
eae
aa ag
sen
|
Fer)
tư
:
26796,8
øo4
24,992.8
6&l
2
656)
$l, 850.6
6|,685,T
int
also:i, j
ms;
ie
of
"
|
=
Loaded
_
| Twovor- More: ‘Design
kanes: Loaded
Lever Rule _
:
:
ˆ
Range. of
Applicability.
Sa
8€ 8y
-1.0
e=077+ ay
connécted to act
: Double T Sections
nh,
ae
if sufficiently
ll Concrete T- Beams, T and
:
4
5
Applicable Cross- | One Design
‘ Section from
Lane
Table
4:6.2.2.1-1
:
.
ms, "
hư
a, e, kand
:
(St)
-
= 0/908 bas
beamsQuy
fr manent? exterrer
of hue Pees 4D
$7
85,5
Leet
6.06
gp eos. -11 + 85.5 (H4,81)")= 1,381,330 int
+ l@S
fade ae more. Design tay dpesed
is
ae
-
Ze
O
¥ :0(00S)= W.Slin
=: 85,5 in®
=
a)
Age
T4125
4 = W289
Fi /gs, %e-58/n
—
AC
2075
Z10
18°x 78" Plange
C2
—
œ
g
21.0
.
as a unit
9.1
4 It -
ia
⁄#iabLc
1
M46
khu
lJ J
"ï
9
2.2, Zel4
Gr by
_-
px
"
a
teace¿ beeen “fie.
1 carey: oF exteriov bean cand interior esse
one
oP Curly. or †roffic barrre/
lane 'loaded,
arg rule)
WEBS
oR
421
mul
gO
c\ìez-4.4 -} 34x 2/5
DT-1412
—
gi: Bisteee facto,
Lọ
Re (OF SAH)= 1, 523 nresehiolees
rẻ e(
LLDF= LS2a
YE AN NZ)= 314 ‹e^9
2 ey
"DESIGNED BY
S4 ECT
DATE
———Ễ———
CHECKED
BY
“eS
“a2FD
1,
LA
DATE | SUBJECT
iaAs OF
Desian
€
OUNTY
= © (interior)
b6
C=O.
~~
du
-
t de 20.774 2S _ 1,098
—ae
<1,
25
Skewed Bridges:
STRUCTURES
Type of Superstructure
=x
oe
`
9 = G0°- 16,337°= 13.068 °
Applicabl
Any
Cross-Section
from Table
Deck, Filled Grid,
Steel or Concrete Beams;
bong Tem
T-B
Number of Design
iT
Applicability
e, kand
if nu.
| am
head Disr; ,U hà?
kK)
aos
-
9
Ss}
On
46.2.2,
Dis
,
.
Soho of live /oac!s
for Shear
“kets
$cx⁄L$
b
li
7⁄9 <42°, ,en C.*0,o lherckwe I~ toulfanitccs)'= ho
Arh.
ra
Moment
19
song, Beams
a : h s 240
| 52944 enl (Ệ
ac
Fachirs
30° ° < 8 < 60 °
3.5< S < 16.0
taney"!
1 ey (tane
4.6.2.2, %e-]
Reduction of
.
nh ij
necte
Table
Range of
Y lanes Loaded
If8 < 30° then c, = 0.0
If 8 > 60° use
6 = 60°
Ụ
DIV, šIDN
1rL1.¿.2.2,2e
-
on Partially Filled Grid on
(72%, Go
20 2lxJờy
)
Table 4.6.2.2.3a-1 - Distribution of Live
Load per Lane for Shear in interior Beams
ON
“DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATI
6, 759 hanesfeircler
4.6.2.2.1-1
OF
=3
_
%,}
g = 1072 (0.708) =
ac Ls
~
hư,
.
¬
+WO or More lanes loadedl
cư
í
ID vi
Dist button of jive loads ccont,) Cromept.gn'y )
woh q2
“2
l
Type of
Applicable
Superstructure
One Design Lane |
Cross-Section
from Table
Two or More Design
Loaded
Range of
Lanes Loaded
Applicability
4.6.2.2.1-1
Concrete Deck,
Filled Grid, or
Partially Filled Grid
on Steel or Concrete
Bearns; Concrete TBeams, T- and
Double T-Sections
Ene
@
e, k and also i,
j
if sufficiently
connected to act
as a unit
§
8 / se
0.38 * 355
20 < L < 240
4.5 st, < 12.0
10,000 < K, <
7,000,000
N, 2 4
‘
co
lane loadecl:
LEDF? 0.136+ 325,90
two hanes Joacleck:
= O.36+
,
"LLDF: OnE A2~ Cs)? 0,2 +
4,0,2.2.
Ort.
3.5
0.2 "Š{ 3
3b Exterior Beans, Shear
ÌÌ. O/23.0
:
2
O, 00 6an¢3/Gircley
|
- ("Yap )*2 \.O1R Lanes/@irdlot
Table 4.6.2.2.3b-1 - Distribution of Live Load per Lane for
Shear in Exterior Beams
Type of Superstructure
|
:
|
|
Lat
<=
Concrete Deck, Filled Grid,
or Partially Filled Grid on
Steel or Concrete Beams.
Concrete T-Beams, T- and
‹
Double T-Beams
—
DT~1412
Applicable
Cross-Section
from Table
4.6.2.2.1-1
, K and
also i, j
if sufficiently
connected to
act as a unit
One Design
Lane
Loaded
Lever Rule
Two or More
Design Lanes
Loaded
F = © Dinterior
d
Range of
Applicability
-1.0 < d,«< 8.5
e=06+—2%
-
“si
Ỷ
\ oO
a
DESIGNED
PAGE
DATE
BY
————_
1100 J. K.
NASHVILLE.
DIV‘s1ON OF STRUCTURES
BION
one 2 lane
(cant) § Ghear, cx. Gircter)
loaclec!
¢ lever rule2)
4= 27/4 lans/GuweEr
+W0 or moreCog?
TENNES
37219
POLK 0FFICE
BÉ _
SEE
NSIT
(same as 3 far rrament)
lanes loachack
ink
2ees ay art AchO - et
2.9510
= 0.825
37 = 2/ữ25( 00/89)- 0,89 lanes/„vo7
Oth 4.o,2:2,.3e Skewes Bridges—
— Ð= 3,663?
|
Table 4.6.2.2.3¢-1 - Correction Factors for Load
Distribution Factors for Support Shear of the Obtuse
Corner
Type of Superstructure
Applicable
Cross-Section
from Table
4.6.2.2.1-1
Correction Factor
or Partially Filled Grid on
Steel or Concrete Beams;
Concrete T-Beams, T- and
Double T Section
C
ij
if sufficiently
1.0+ oa.
connected to
act as a junit
rrection factor+ 04LO+ 0,0120
12.0Lt
9
3ì 03
J
0°<8<60
3.5
tan 8
20
N, 24
te0 G5
es) }” (Mr 13,663)==f hOe/
Semn )/2/ Of 1e LuncÊ_ Dolobu y2 factors
+,
OF TRANSPORTATION
Bean
_
one lune hades
2,
2.804%/)2 ô8f4 —
14 effechue
Pits
Bean
eentraiinRe ine
`
`
OF#(h0E)=0970
|
Fatigucard
AF (/106/) 2 O, 948
;o/0(14)+ 08
(Art. 4.0.2.0)
do UY tu
11:00 (12) 24132 wn
Won
ence:
exh
Crh 36.3)
Beary, Cees wane
Ye (eFfechic spar + Ye} 2) sean
oP es
sary
con, ‘Beau
US H7\n far effechue Sal lel
achorefe Limit Stade
All other levirk States:
DT-1412
two ar mare lanes fog
3+2 uidlh dê nọ tạ x 16): 18,3 Jfn “vs si
-
Pedocrion,
01708
earn
HA
(84/2) BevdersX 15) 2,564
awe merctanesloudeck
0,40 |
ext,
(LuDFofdebiecHiMA,
Avsate,
onctens loaded
int,
SỔ
Range of
Applicability
_
¡ || Concrete Deck, Filled Grid, | đổ e, k and also
⁄2 2
TENNESSE... DEPARTMENT
COUNTY
DATE
BY
CHECKED
272: l5
Z2:
/.?3
tr!
NI =2)» Sa
n
W05)48
8 8S
Flin
Live Load Distribution for Exterior Beam
Oid Hickory Bivd. SR-45 over I-65
Davidson County
Date: July 30, 2003
Article 4.6.2.2.2d_ Exterior Beams
The additional investigation is required because the distribution factor fo girders in a multi-girder cross-section,
Type “a’,"e", and "k" in table 4.6.2.2.1-1, was determined without consid eration of diaphragm or cross-frames.
The recommended
procedure is an interim provision until research provi des a better solution
The procedure outlined in this section is the same as the conventiona | approximation for loads on piles.
R = (NL / Nb) +((Xext}(sum e))lanes / ((sum x*2))beams
where: R = reaction on exterior beam
in terms of lanes
NL = number of loaded lanes under consideration
e = eccentricity) of a design truck or a design lane load from the center of gravity
of the pattern of girders (FT)
x = horizontal distance from the center of gravity of the pattern of girders to each girder (FT)
Xext. = horizontal distance from the center of gravity of the pattern of girders to the exterior girder (FT)
one loaded:
3.75
ree
|
|
—
30.75
` ‘
2775 __
center-tine of bridge
Muliti-presense factor for one lane loaded:
i
cH
LH
1100 —-gÌ4— 11.00 _"
7
R = (NL / Nb) +((Xext)(sum e)jlanes / ((sum x*2))beams
Beams:
a
k 4.50 má—
1
number of beams:
Lanes: ((Xext}(sum e}):
co
1.2
number of lanes:
one lane loaded:
11.00 —
therefore: R =
((sum X^2)):
NL /Nb:
0.531
1014.750
3388.000
0.143
lanes per beam
Xext.= 33.000 —————..
1#
4®————————
—
k—
1100—*
22.00 ———————>
33.00 ————————-+
two janes loaded:
18.6 ————>
4P
hon
ca ry
12.00
2
ieee
4———
1250 —
Ò
75
T4
A
=—
12.00
<<
6. 1T
number of beams:
7
R = (NL / Nb) +((Xext}(sum e))lanes / ((sum x*2))beams
41.00 —p
—
33.00
Beams: ((sum X^2)):
NL /Nb.
two lanes loaded:
therefore: R =
0.765
1625.250
3388 000
0.286
janes per beam
11.00—*
4.50 po *4——
i
1200—*
3075-~
«“_- 6. ¬
1100 —y+—
6.00
|
TTI
#—””
|
18.80—————\
12.00
„—
J
in
1
2
22.00 —————*
*F—”
{
4£———-
3.75
Là. r
|
——— |
three lanes loaded:
1.0
Multl-presense factor for one lane loaded:
number of lanes:
Xext.= 33.000 ——————
#£—
|
TL
Lanes: ((Xext}(sum e)):
l 4.50 xá — 11.00 —ple— 11.00 re
,
enter-line of bridge
6©
0.500
ccsrne
|
+
ch
1100 —y|4—— 1:06 — |
of bridge
Multi-presense factor for one lane loaded:
number of lanes:
number of beams:
0.85
3
7
R = (NL / Nb) +((Xext)(sum e))lanes / ((sum x*2))beams
Lanes: ((Xext)(sum e)):
1839.750
Beams: ((sum X^2)):
3388.000
NL/Nb:
0.429
three lanes loaded:
therefore. R =
0.826 lanes per beam
Xext.= ——
33.000
k—- 11.00—*
—
22.00
———————*-
33.00 ———————>>
iz
Washington State Department of Transportation
Bridge and Structures Office
QConBridge 1.1 Release Date: Oct 1, 1999
| Supporting Component: Stee! Beam
Deck Type
: CIP/Precast Concrete
Supporting Component Description
Interior Girder
Top Flange t= 1.5 inch w= 18 inch
Web t=0.5 inch h= 54 inch
Bottom Flange t= 1.75 inch w= 18 inch
Unit Wgt = 490 pcf
Mod. E = 2.9e+07 psi
Span Length = 162.5 feet
Girder Spacing = 11 feet
Num. Beams = 8
November 12, 2006 6:38:12 am
Page 1
(in. Girder
Deck Description
Slab Depth = 9 inch
Pad Depth = 1.5 inch
Sacrificial Depth = 0 inch
Unit Wot = 150 pef
fic = 3000 psi
Eff. Span Length = 162.5 feet
Design Lane Width = 12 feet
Skew Corrections
Distribution factors for moment are corrected for skew
Distribution factors for shear are corrected for skew
Skew Angle = 13.663 deg
Girder Properties
Ax = 85.500e+00 inch^2
Iz = 51.647e+03 inch^4
CG = 27.243e+00 inch
Slab Properties
Eff. Flange Width = 117.000e+00 inch
Mod. E = 3.340e+06 psi
Composite Properties
Ax = 209.912e+00 inch*2
Iz = 117.771e+03 inch*4
CG = 48.506e+00 inch
Unit Wot = 971.334 pcf
Mod. E = 29.000e+06 psi
n= 8.68081
Distribution Factors
eg = 36.006e+00 inch
Kg = 1.410e+06 inch*4
Strength/Service Limit State
Moment
1 Loaded Lane = 0.463275
2+ Loaded Lanes = 0.711177
Shear
1 Loaded Lane = 0.840199
2+ Loaded Lanes = 1.08349
ae
oa
iy
Fatigue Limit State
gMoment = 0.386063
gShear = 0.700166
Washington State Department of Transportation
November 12, 2006 6:50:49 am
Bridge and Structures Office
QConBridge 1.1 Release Date: Oct 1, 1999
|
Page 1
Supporting Component: Steel Beam
Deck Type
-
: CIP/Precast Concrete
`
eC Xf,
G um d en
Supporting Component Description
Exterior Girder
Top Flange t= 1.5 inch w= 18 inch
Web t= 0.5 inch h=54 inch
Bottom Flange t= 1.75 inch w= 18 inch
Unit Wgt = 490 pcf
Mod. E = 2.9e+07 psi
Cross Frames are present
Span
Girder
Num.
Num.
Length = 162.5 feet
Spacing = 11 feet
Beams = 8
Lanes = 3
Deck Description
Slab Depth = 9 inch
Pad Depth = 1.5 inch
Sacrificial Depth = 0 inch
Overhang = 54 inch
de = 33 inch
Unit Wgt = 150 pcf
fic = 3000 psi
Eff. Span Length = 162.5 feet
Design Lane Width = 12 feet
Skew Corrections
Distribution factors for moment are corrected for skew
Distribution factors for shear are corrected for skew
Skew Angle = 13.667 deg
Girder Properties
Ax = 85.500e+00 inch*2
Iz = 51.647e+03 inch*4
CG = 27.243e+00 inch
Slab Properties
Eff. Flange Width = 112.500e+00 inch
Mod. E = 3.340e+06 psi
Composite Properties
Ax = 205.246e+00 inch^2
lz = 116.702e+03 inch^4
CG = 48.171e+00 inch
Unit Wgt = 963.815 pcf
Mod. E = 29.000e+06 psi
n = 8.68081
Distribution Factors
eg = 36.006e+00 inch
Kg = 1.410e+06 inch^4
¬
__,
Strength/Service Limit State
Moment
"4 Loaded Lane = 0.963135
2+ Loaded Lanes = 0.788737
Shear
|
—
Shea
-
1LoadedLane
2+L
= 1.01008
aded Lanes ==( 0.962838
Fatigue Limit State
gMoment = 0.802613
gShear = 0.841737
|
:
|
Section 1 - Introduction
COMMENTARY
SPECIFICATIONS
1.3 DESIGN PHILOSOPHY
1.3.1
C1.3.1
General
Bridges shall be designed for specified limit states to
achieve ise objectives of constructibility, safety, and
serviceability, with due regard to issues of inspectability,
economy, and aesthetics, as specified in Article 2.5.
Regardless of the type of analysis used, Equation
1.3.2.1-1 shall be satisfied for all specified force effects
and combinations thereof.
1.3.2
1.3.2.1
The
behavior, although the
using elastic analysis.
most current bridge
incomplete knowledge
cases,
on
the
and
connections
basis
is
of inelastic
force effects are determined by
This inconsistency is common to
specifications as a result of
of inelastic structural action.
C1.3.2.1
GENERAL
Equation 1 is the basis of LRFD methodology.
Assigning resistance factor @ = 1.0 to all nonstrength
limit states is a temporary measure; development work
is in progress.
Ductility, redundancy, and operational importance
are significant aspects affecting the margin of safety of
bridges. Whereas the first two directly relate to physical
strength, the last concerns the consequences of the
bridge being out of service.
The grouping of these
aspects on the load side of Equation 1 is, therefore,
component
and connection shall satisfy
1 for each limit state, unless otherwise
For service and extreme event limit states,
resistance factors shall be taken as 1.0, except for bolts,
for which the provisions of Article 6.5.5 shall apply.
limit states shall be considered of equal importance.
All
(1.3.2.1-1)
PRR,
ZNHVYQ<
for which:
arbitrary.
NoNane
(1.3.2.1-2)
0.95
For loads for which a minimum value of y, is appropriate:
1
n=
<1.0
_ Tpnạn,
1.3.2.1-3
)
where:
Y
=
load factor:
a statistically
applied to force effects
based
@
=
resistance factor: a statistically based multiplier
applied to nominal resistance, as specified in
multiplier
Sections 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, and 12
nN;
=
load modifier:
a factor relating to ductility,
redundancy, and operational importance
No
=
a factor relating to ductility, as specified in Article
1.3.3
Nr
=
a factor relating to redundancy
Article 1.3.4
However,
it
constitutes
a
first
effort
at
codification. In the absence of more precise information,
each effect, except that for fatigue and fracture, is
estimated as +5 percent, accumulated geometrically, a
clearly subjective approach.
With time, improved
quantification of ductility, redundancy, and operational
importance, and their interaction and system synergy,
may be attained, possibly leading to a rearrangement of
Equation 1, in which these effects may appear on either
side of the equation or on both sides. NCHRP Project
12-36 is currently addressing the issue of redundancy.
The influence of n on the reliability index, B, can be
estimated by observing its effect on the minimum values
of 8 calculated in a database of girder-type bridges. For
discussion purposes, the girder bridge data used in the
calibration of these Specifications was modified by
multiplying the total factored loads by n = 0.95, 1.0, 1.05,
and 1.10. The resulting minimum values of B for 95
combinations of span, spacing, and type of construction
were determined to be approximately 3.0, 3.5, 3.8, and
4.0, respectively... _
A further approximate representation of the effect of
n values can be obtained by considering the percent of
random normal data less than or equal to the mean
value plus A o, where A is a multiplier, and ơ is the
standard deviation of the data. If A is taken as 3.0, 3.5,
For loads for which a maximum value of y, is appropriate:
=
in many
Limit States
Each
Equation
specified.
Nn
resistance of components
determined,
as specified in
3.8, and 4.0, the percent of values less than or equal to
the mean value plus A o would be about 99.865 percent,
1-3
1s
-
Section 1 - Introduction
COMMENTARY
SPECIFICATIONS
=
1.00 for conventional designs and
complying with these Specifications
details
>
0.95 for components and connections for which
additional ductility-enhancing measures have
been specified beyond those required by these
Specifications
For all other limit states:
No =
1.00
can be considered ductile. Such ductile performance
shall be verified by testing.
In order to achieve adequate inelastic behavior the
system should have a sufficient number of ductile
members and either:
e
e
Joints and connections that are also ductile and can
provide energy dissipation without loss of capacity;
or
Joints and connections that have sufficient excess
strength so as to assure that the inelastic response
occurs at the locations designed to provide ductile,
energy absorbing response.
Statically
ductile,
but
dynamically
nonductile
response characteristics should be avoided. Examples
of this behavior are. shear.and bond failures in concrete
members and loss of composite action in flexural
components.
Past experience indicates that typical components
designed in accordance with these provisions generally
exhibit adequate ductility. Connection and joints require
special attention to detailing and the provision of load
paths.
The Owner may specify a minimum ductility factor as
an assurance that ductile failure modes will be obtained.
The factor may be defined as:
š
A,
H “A,
.
.
-
(€1.3.3-1)
where:
A, - deformation at ultimate
A, - deformation at the elastic limit
The ductility capacity of structural components or
connections may either be established by full- or largescale testing or with analytical models based on
documented material behavior. The ductility capacity for
a structural system may be determined by integrating
local deformations over the entire structural system.
The special requirements for energy dissipating
devices are imposed because of the rigorous demands
placed on these components.
1.3.4
Redundancy
Multiple-load-path and continuous structures should
be used unless there are compelling reasons not to use
them.
C1.3.4
For each load cor›5ination anc limit state under
classification
redundancy
member
consideration,
(redundant or nonredundant)
member
1-5
contribution
to
the
should
bridge
be based
safety.
upon the
Several
Section 1 - Introduction
REFERENCES
Frangopol, D. M., and R. Nakib. "Redundancy in Highway Bridges." Engineering Journal, AISC, Vol. 28, No. 1, 1991,
pp. 45-50.
&
od
"
„.„
lable
Load Combination
3.4.1-1
- Load
Combinations
Factors
LL
IM
CE
BR
PL
LS
WA | WS
STRENGTH-I
(unless noted)
Vp
1.75
1.00
-
-
1.00
10.50/1.20 | Vịạc
STRENGTH-II
Vp
4.35
1.00
-
-
STRENGTH-III
Yo
-
1.00 | 1.40
STRENGTH-IV
EH, EV, ES, DW
DC ONLY
Yo
4.5
-
1.00
STRENGTH-V
Vp
1.35
1.00 | 0.40]
EXTREME
EVENT-I
Yp
Veo
1.00
EXTREME
EVENT-II
Vp
0.50
4.00
SERVICE-I
1.00
1.00
1.00 | 0.30)
SERVICE-II
1.00
1.30
1.00
-
SERVICE-IH
1.00
0.80
1.00
-
-
-
0.75
-
-
-
FATIGUE-LL,
CE ONLY
FR
Load
DC
DD
DW
EH
EV
ES
EL
Limit State
[| WL
and
TU
CR
SH
TG
IM &
:
|Ysg|
-
-
-
-
4.00 | 0.50/1.20 | Vie
|Vsel
-
-
-
-
-
1.00
[Vsel
-
-
-
ˆ
-
1.00 | 0.50/1.20
-
-
-
-
|Ysel
-
-
-
-
-
-
{1.00
-
-
-
-
-
-
lYse|l
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
|Vsel
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
'99
'00
|0.50/1.20 | V+c
1.00
-
1.00
-
-
4.00
TỔ
-
==
CT | CV
IC
1.0
-
Use One of These ata
Time
EQ
-
|SE}|
1.0
|0.50/1.20 | Vrc
¬
1.00 | 1.00/1.20 | Vịc
"
1.00
|1.00/120|
-
4.00 | 1.00/1.20 | Yres
-
-
-
-
4.00 | 1.00 | 1.00
|.
Table 3.4.1-2 - Load Factors for Permanent Loads, y,
Load
Factor
Type of Load
Maximum
Minimum
DC:
Component and Attachments
1.25
0.90
DD:
Downdrag
1.80
0.45
DW:
Wearing Surfaces and Utilities
1.50
0.65
1.50
1.35
0.90
0.90
1.0
1.0
1.35
1.30
1.35
1.95
1.00
0.90
0.90
0.90
1.50
0.90
1.50
0.75
EH: Horizontal Earth Pressure
®
Active
e
At-Rest
EL:
Locked-in
EV:
e
e
e
@
Vertical Earth Pressure
Retaining Walls and Abutments
Rigid Buried Structure
Rigid Frames
Flexible Buried Structures other
@
ES:
Erection Stresses
than Metal Box Culverts
Flexible Metal Box Culverts
Earth Surcharge
.
3-11
\a