Chapter 4
Prioritizing Issues, Setting
and Revising Goals
Outline
Goal setting and contingencies
BATNA – Best Alternative to Negotiated
Agreement
Strategies to staying on track
Negotiating issue priorities
Team negotiations
Goal Setting & Contingencies
Upon completion of intelligence
gathering, a negotiator is ready to set
goals and identify contingencies
•
What is the ideal outcome?
•
What are contingency goals in case the
ideal is unattainable?
Example – Career Search
Imagine you have just visited with
several companies at your University
career fair. You’re excited about the
possibilities with 3 companies but know
the job market is competitive.
•
Identify your ideal job/company
•
Identify your contingency goals
BATNA
What will I do if we can’t come to an
agreement that meets my needs?
•
Prepare for instances where the
achievement of the ideal and/or
contingency outcomes are not possible
•
Identify a fall-back position
•
Avoid a sense of failure and desperation
•
Provides a safety net
Developing Goals, Contingencies &
BATNAs
Read Toys, Toys, Toys
Identify important issues
Identify ideal outcomes for each issue
Identify contingency outcomes
Identify BATNA
Staying on Track
Skilled negotiators stay on track through
preparation
•
Identify possible irrelevant claims (e.g. fallacies)
•
Anticipate issues
•
Prepare for diversion
•
Identify effective ways to respond
Identify whether the claim (argument) is
relevant to the outcome
Negotiating Issue Priorities
Negotiators may face times when the other
party presents issues that haven’t been
anticipated and/or raises issues that are
unimportant or irrelevant to the primary
issue
Various options to consider (e.g. dismiss, put-
off to later)
Issue folding
Seek a win-win approach rather than win-lose
Issue Prioritization
Negotiator 1
Negotiator 2
Issue A
Issue B Issue C Issue A Issue B Issue C
Common Prioritization
High priority
Interest
Disinterest
Fold C into B due
to relatedness
Team Negotiations
Negotiations with teams present new challenges
•
Focus on task
•
Focus on relationships
•
Seek balance
“Hot teams” – devoted to task but not one another
and may be confrontational, challenging and critical
“Warm teams” – focused on task but also concerned
with relationships
Give group members opportunity to voice opinions
and seek consensus