Tải bản đầy đủ (.ppt) (10 trang)

DOCTOR OF MANAGEMENT IN ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP - 07/31/2011

Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (76.74 KB, 10 trang )

Doctor of Management in Organizational
Leadership
TRAINING METHODS: A STUDY OF THE
TRAINING METHODS AND DATA
RETENTION OF
ADULTS IN THE BANKING INDUSTRY
Significance

267 banking citations during the 6 years prior
to 9-11.

442 citations during the 6 years after 9-11,
representing a 65.5% increase.

Monetary fines accessed for the 6 years prior
to 9-11 were $976,400, as compared to the
fines accessed for the 6 years post 9-11 of
$82,034,000, which represents an 830%
increase. (www.occ.treas.gov)
Relevance to Study

Court documents filed by the OCC revealed
that “ineffective” training was commonly listed
as a compliance deficiency.

OCC vs. Riggs Bank, N.A. of McLean, TX.
The OCC specifically cited that, “The Bank’s
numerous BSA-related deficiencies demonstrate
that the Bank’s training program was
ineffective.” The Riggs Bank case resulted in a
$25,000,000 civil money penalty. (


www.occ.treas.gov/FTP/EAs/ea2004-44.pdf)
Relevance to Study

USA Patriot Act significantly increased the training
requirements for the banking industry.

The banking industry was faced with a need to
change their training procedures.

Many banks moved from FTF training to CBT.



Study Question: Is CBT as effective as FTF?

Study Question: Which promotes greater
knowledge retention?
Research Method

Quantitative quasi-experimental
research study.

Population under investigation - 30
randomly selected bank employees
representing 57% of the sample
population of a small national bank with
5 locations in Kansas.
Research Study

Step 1 - pre-test all 30 participants to

baseline knowledge.

Step 2 - Group A - 15 participants will receive
FTF training.
Group B – 15 participants will receive CBT.

Step 3 - Post-test to measure increment of
change in test scores between the
two training methods.

Step 4 - Re-test 30 days later for retention.
Design Appropriateness

The quantitative quasi-experimental method provided
a viable method in the research design by using a pre-
test and post-test model in conducting the analysis.
(Campbell & Stanley, 1963)

Quantitative research designs are appropriate when
correlating, measuring, and examining casual
relationships among variables.
(Creswell, 2003)
How Data Will Be Collected

Participants will be coded A1 through A15
(Group A) and B1 through B15 (Group B).

Pre-test scores will be recorded for each
participant.


After training, participants will complete a
post-test and those scores will be recorded for
each participant.

A repeat test will be given 30 days after
training to measure retention.

How Data Will Be Analyzed
Sample Coding Sheet
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Increment Step 4 Increment
Pre-test Training Post-test Change Retention Change
A1 70 FTF 85 +15 75 -10
A2 65 FTF 75 +10 70 - 5
A3
A4
B1 75 CBT 90 +15 75 -15
B2 85 CBT 100 +15 90 -10
B3
B4
References

Campbell, D., & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental
and quasi-experimental designs for research.
Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Creswell, J., (2003).
Research Design; Qualitative, Quantitaive,
and Mixed Methods Approaches (2nd ed.)
Sage Publications, Inc.

×