Tải bản đầy đủ (.ppt) (79 trang)

chapter 13 game theory and competitive strategy

Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (352.97 KB, 79 trang )

Chapter 13
Game Theory
and Competitive
Strategy
Chapter 13 Slide 2
Topics to be Discussed

Gaming and Strategic Decisions

Dominant Strategies

The Nash Equilibrium Revisited

Repeated Games
Chapter 13 Slide 3
Topics to be Discussed

Sequential Games

Threats, Commitments, and Credibility

Entry Deterrence

Bargaining Strategy
Chapter 13 Slide 4
Gaming and Strategic Decisions

“If I believe that my competitors are
rational and act to maximize their own
profits, how should I take their behavior
into account when making my own


profit-maximizing decisions?”

Definition of a game
Chapter 13 Slide 5
Gaming and Strategic Decisions

Noncooperative versus Cooperative
Games

Cooperative Game

Players negotiate binding contracts that
allow them to plan joint strategies

Example: Buyer and seller negotiating the
price of a good or service or a joint venture
by two firms (i.e. Microsoft and Apple)

Binding contracts are possible
Chapter 13 Slide 6
Gaming and Strategic Decisions

Noncooperative versus Cooperative
Games

Noncooperative Game

Negotiation and enforcement of a
binding contract are not possible


Example: Two competing firms assuming
the others behavior determine,
independently, pricing and advertising
strategy to gain market share

Binding contracts are not possible
Chapter 13 Slide 7
Gaming and Strategic Decisions

Noncooperative versus Cooperative
Games

“The strategy design is based on
understanding your opponent’s point of
view, and (assuming you opponent is
rational) deducing how he or she is likely to
respond to your actions”
Chapter 13 Slide 8
Dominant Strategies

Dominant Strategy

One that is optimal no matter what an
opponent does.

An Example

A & B sell competing products

They are deciding whether to undertake

advertising campaigns
Chapter 13 Slide 9
Payoff Matrix for Advertising Game
Firm A
Advertise
Don’t
Advertise
Advertise
Don’t
Advertise
Firm B
10, 5 15, 0
10, 26, 8
Chapter 13 Slide
10
Payoff Matrix for Advertising Game
Firm A
Advertise
Don’t
Advertise
Advertise
Don’t
Advertise
Firm B
10, 5 15, 0
10, 26, 8

Observations

A: regardless of

B, advertising is
the best

B: regardless of
A, advertising is
best
Chapter 13 Slide
11
Payoff Matrix for Advertising Game
Firm A
Advertise
Don’t
Advertise
Advertise
Don’t
Advertise
Firm B
10, 5 15, 0
10, 26, 8

Observations

Dominant
strategy for A &
B is to advertise

Do not worry
about the other
player


Equilibrium in
dominant
strategy
Chapter 13 Slide
12
Dominant Strategies

Game Without Dominant Strategy

The optimal decision of a player without a
dominant strategy will depend on what the
other player does.
Chapter 13 Slide
13
10, 5 15, 0
20, 26, 8
Firm A
Advertise
Don’t
Advertise
Advertise
Don’t
Advertise
Firm B
Modified Advertising Game
Chapter 13 Slide
14
10, 5 15, 0
20, 26, 8
Firm A

Advertise
Don’t
Advertise
Advertise
Don’t
Advertise
Firm B
Modified Advertising Game

Observations

A: No dominant
strategy;
depends on B’s
actions

B: Advertise

Question

What should A
do? (Hint:
consider B’s
decision
Chapter 13 Slide
15
The Nash Equilibrium Revisited

Dominant Strategies


“I’m doing the best I can no matter what
you do.”

“You’re doing the best you can no matter
what I do.”
Chapter 13 Slide
16
The Nash Equilibrium Revisited

Nash Equilibrium

“I’m doing the best I can given what you
are doing”

“You’re doing the best you can given what I
am doing.”
Chapter 13 Slide
17

Examples With A Nash Equilibrium

Two cereal companies

Market for one producer of crispy cereal

Market for one producer of sweet cereal

Each firm only has the resources to
introduce one cereal


Noncooperative
The Nash Equilibrium Revisited
Product Choice Problem
Product Choice Problem
Chapter 13 Slide
18
Product Choice Problem
Firm 1
Crispy Sweet
Crispy
Sweet
Firm 2
-5, -5 10, 10
-5, -510, 10
Chapter 13 Slide
19
Product Choice Problem
Firm 1
Crispy Sweet
Crispy
Sweet
Firm 2
-5, -5 10, 10
-5, -510, 10

Question

Is there a Nash
equilibrium?


If not, why?

If so, how can
it be reached
Chapter 13 Slide
20
The Nash Equilibrium Revisited

Maximin Strategies

Scenario

Two firms compete selling file-encryption
software

They both use the same encryption
standard (files encrypted by one
software can be read by the other -
advantage to consumers)
Chapter 13 Slide
21
The Nash Equilibrium Revisited

Maximin Strategies

Scenario

Firm 1 has a much larger market share
than Firm 2


Both are considering investing in a new
encryption standard
Chapter 13 Slide
22
Maximin Strategy
Firm 1
Don’t invest Invest
Firm 2
0, 0 -10, 10
20, 10-100, 0
Don’t invest
Invest
Chapter 13 Slide
23
Maximin Strategy
Firm 1
Don’t invest Invest
Firm 2
0, 0 -10, 10
20, 10-100, 0
Don’t invest
Invest

Observations

Dominant
strategy Firm 2:
Invest

Nash equilibrium


Firm 1: invest

Firm 2: Invest
Chapter 13 Slide
24
Maximin Strategy
Firm 1
Don’t invest Invest
Firm 2
0, 0 -10, 10
20, 10-100, 0
Don’t invest
Invest

Observations

If Firm 2 does
not invest, Firm
1 incurs
significant
losses

Firm 1 might
play don’t invest

Minimize
losses to 10
maximin
strategy

Chapter 13 Slide
25

If both are rational and informed

Both firms invest

Nash equilibrium
The Nash Equilibrium Revisited
Maximin Strategy
Maximin Strategy

×